Lean Six Sigma Green Belt Training
description
Transcript of Lean Six Sigma Green Belt Training
A
Lean Six Sigma
Green Belt Training
ING Business School
UNIT 2Measure
UNIT 2Measure
ING Business School Ref Unit 2-1
Measure – Learning Objectives
At the conclusion of this unit, you will be able to:
• Create detailed process map/flowchart.• Develop a data collection plan to gather initial
data. • Stratify data to facilitate understanding.• Revise the problem statement based on data.• Assess financial impact of your project.
ING Business School
Create Detailed Process
Map
DEFINE MEASURE ANALYZE IMPROVE CONTROL
Gather Initial Data
Stratify Data
Revise Problem
Statement
Assess Financial
Impact
Overall objective: Narrow the improvement opportunity to a specific problem statement. Overall objective: Narrow the improvement
opportunity to a specific problem statement.
Ref Unit 2-2a
Measure – Major Activities
ING Business School
Key Deliverables: Commonly Used Tools:
Ref Unit 2-2b
Measure – Key Deliverables/Commonly Used Tools
•Detailed process flowchart •Upstream metrics/ Targets/Specification limits•Data collection plan•Operational Definitions•Metric stratification•Defect definitions•Process sigma•Revised problem statement•Statement of cost/benefit
•Flowchart/Process maps•Line graph/Run chart•Data collection worksheet•Checksheet•Concentration diagram•Pareto chart•Histogram•Control chart•Cost/benefit analysis
ING Business School
Create Detailed Process
Map
DEFINE MEASURE ANALYZE IMPROVE CONTROL
Gather Initial Data
Stratify Data
Revise Problem
Statement
Assess Financial
Impact
Ref Unit 2-3a
Measure – Major Activities
ING Business School Ref Unit 2-3b
Process Mapping Benefits
• Provides a picture • Promotes consistency • Fosters teamwork• Stimulates ownership• Highlights inefficient and missing activities• Gets everyone singing on the same page
ING Business School
Customer SalesClerk
SalesEngineer
MarketingRep
Sales/Mktg.Manager
Send RFPReceive
RFP
LogRFP
AssignRFP
Wantto Quote
?
No
Prepare Proposal
Yes
Prepare “NoQuote” Letter
UpdateCust. File
AddPricing
SpecsOK?
PriceOK?
A
A
No
Yes
ApproveProposal
ReceiveResponse
Yes
O1
No
SendResponse
Log/Give to Mgr.
Send RFPSend RFPReceive
RFPReceive
RFP
LogRFPLogRFP
AssignRFP
AssignRFP
Wantto Quote
?
Wantto Quote
?
No
Prepare ProposalPrepare Proposal
Yes
Prepare “NoQuote” LetterPrepare “NoQuote” Letter
UpdateCust. File
AddPricing
AddPricing
SpecsOK?
SpecsOK?
PriceOK?
PriceOK?
AA
AA
No
Yes
ApproveProposalApproveProposal
ReceiveResponseReceive
Response
Yes
O1O1
U1
No
SendResponse
SendResponse
Log/Give to Mgr.
Log/Give to Mgr.
Customer SalesClerk
SalesEngineer
MarketingRep
Sales/Mktg.Manager
Send RFPSend RFPReceive
RFPReceive
RFP
LogRFPLogRFP
AssignRFP
AssignRFP
Wantto Quote
?
Wantto Quote
?
No
Prepare ProposalPrepare Proposal
Yes
Prepare “NoQuote” LetterPrepare “NoQuote” Letter
UpdateCust. File
AddPricing
AddPricing
SpecsOK?
SpecsOK?
PriceOK?
PriceOK?
AA
AA
No
Yes
ApproveProposalApproveProposal
ReceiveResponseReceive
Response
Yes
O1O1
No
SendResponse
SendResponse
Log/Give to Mgr.
Log/Give to Mgr.
Send RFPSend RFPReceive
RFPReceive
RFP
LogRFPLogRFP
AssignRFP
AssignRFP
Wantto Quote
?
Wantto Quote
?
No
Prepare ProposalPrepare Proposal
Yes
Prepare “NoQuote” LetterPrepare “NoQuote” Letter
UpdateCust. File
AddPricing
AddPricing
SpecsOK?
SpecsOK?
PriceOK?
PriceOK?
AA
AA
No
Yes
ApproveProposalApproveProposal
ReceiveResponseReceive
Response
Yes
O1O1
U1
No
SendResponse
SendResponse
Log/Give to Mgr.
Log/Give to Mgr.
Log/Give to Mgr.
Log/Give to Mgr.
As-isvs.
Should be
“Swimlanes”
Ref Unit 2-4
Functional Flowcharts
• Who is available• Who has knowledge
ING Business School
A
An oval is used to show the inputs to start the process, or to show the output at the end of the process.
A rectangle or box is used to show process activities. Each box should have only one arrow coming in, and one going out. Words in a box should begin with an “action word”, e.g., receives, sends, completes, etc.
An arrow is used to show the direction or flow of process activities.
A diamond is used to show where decisions occur in the process. Decisions have one arrow in and two arrows out (yes/no).
A small circle with a letter or number identifies a break in the same page.
A rectangle or box with dashed lines is used to list clarifying information.
Ref Unit 2-5
Common Flowchart Symbols
ING Business School
See Process Mapping Tips See Process Mapping Tips
Ref Unit 2-6/7
Flowcharting Steps
• Identify and name the process • Identify process boundaries • Determine process level• List process roles• Identify activities for each role• Review and validate
ING Business School
Develop a detailed functional flowchart of your project’s process.
Ref Unit 2-9
Activity
ING Business School
DEFINE MEASURE ANALYZE IMPROVE CONTROL
Create Detailed
Process Map
Stratify Data
Revise Problem
Statement
Assess Financial
Impact
Gather Initial Data
Why do we need data?Where does the data come from?
Ref Unit 2-10
Measure – Major Activities
ING Business School
ProcessSuppliers Customers
Products
Services
Products
Services
Inputs Outputs
Outcome Metrics
Is process acceptable?
Ref Unit 2-11
Collect Outcome Metric Data
ING Business School
Do you know the name of this tool?
What does it tell us?
% of Polic ies Not Issued On Time -
0%
2003 2004
Target = <2%
1st Qtr. 2nd Qtr. 3rd Qtr. 4th Qtr. 1st Qtr. 2nd Qtr. 3rd Qtr. 4th Qtr. 1st Qtr. 2nd Qtr.
5%
10%
20%
25%
1st Qtr. 2nd Qtr. 3rd Qtr. 4th Qtr. 1st Qtr. 2nd Qtr. 3rd Qtr. 4th Qtr. 1st Qtr. 2nd Qtr.
15%
GAP Source: X Files
2005
Period
% N
ot
Issu
ed
on
Tim
e
Good
TitlesTitlesData over timeData over time Good arrowGood arrow
Target info.Target info.
Time on X axisTime on X axis
Source info.Source info.
Ref Unit 2-12
The Gap
ING Business School Ref Unit 2-13
Line Graph/Run Chart
• Helps identify cycles, shifts and trends in process performance
• Highlights gaps between process targets and actual performance
• Clarifies before and after changes in process performance
• Aids in predicting future performance
ING Business School
ProcessSuppliers Customers
Products
Services
Products
Services
Inputs Outputs
Upstream Metrics
Outcome Metrics
Upstream Metrics are measures of performance within a process.
Upstream Metrics are measures of performance within a process.
Ref Unit 2-14
Upstream Metrics
ING Business School
Y = f(x)Y = f(x)
Ref Unit 2-15a
Upstream Metrics
Sources of Upstream Metrics• Inputs from suppliers• Outputs from sub-processes • Handoffs from one employee or
department to another• Key decisions • Inspection points
(cont’d.)
ING Business School
Critical Customer
Requirement
Service Characteristic
OutcomeMetric
TargetUpstream
MetricTarget
“I want my policy issued
quickly.”
Turn Around Time
% of policies not issued on
time
<2% not on time
Time to complete
underwriting
<2 working days
Operational Definitions: 1. On time means within 5 working days starting the day after the
policy is received from agent.
2. Time to complete underwriting begins at receipt of policy from Sales, ends when underwriting approved
Ref Unit 2-15b
Process Metrics and Targets Example
ING Business School
Send RFPReceive
RFP
LogRFP
AssignRFP
No
Yes
Prepare “NoQuote” Letter
UpdateCust.. File
AddPricing
SpecsOK?
PriceOK?
PriceOK?
A
No
Yes
ApproveProposalApproveProposal
ReceiveResponse
Yes
O1O1
U1
No
Log/Give to Mgr.
Customer SalesClerk
SalesEngineer
MarketingRep
Send RFP
Wantto Quote
?
No
Prepare Proposal
A
No
Yes
ApproveProposalApproveProposal
Yes
No
SendResponse
Sales/Marketing Manager
Upstream Metric
Outcome Metric
Ref Unit 2-16
Process Metrics and Flowchart
ING Business School
Create Line Graph for Outcome Metric & Define Upstream
Metrics/Targets
Ref Unit 2-17
Activity
ING Business School Ref Unit 2-18a
Overview of Data Collection
Information to be Covered• What types of data will you need?• How can you ensure the data is accurate?• How much data is necessary?• What tools are useful for data collection?
ING Business School Ref Unit 2-18b
Planning for Data Collection
Overall Approach• Plan - Who, What, When, Where, and How
the data will be collected (4Ws and 1H) • Ensure - data integrity• Analyze – compare first samples taken
with what is needed• Adjust - data collection plan as needed
ING Business School Ref Unit 2-19
Types of Data
Continuous data: variables, measurable, e.g. time, distance, weight, money.
Attribute data: discrete, counted; measures presence or absence of a characteristic, e.g. good/bad # of defects.
ING Business School
Analyze Types of Data
Ref Unit 2-20
Activity
ING Business School Ref Unit 2-21
Ensure Data Integrity
• Precise/Accurate – Data from the measurement method or device does not vary much from the actual value
• Repeatable – Repeated measurements of the same item or characteristic by the same person lead to the same result
• Reproducible – Two or more people measuring the same characteristic in the same way get the same result
• Stable over time – Data and measurements taken at different times by different people are done in the same way (the measurement system doesn’t change over time)
ING Business School Ref Unit 2-22
Operational Definitions
DefinitionAn operational
definition is a precise description of how to get a consistent value for the characteristic
you are trying to measure.
Characteristics• Specific • Clear • Measurable • Reflects customer Perspective
Givens • Test and refine the definition after
it is first developed• Training is required to ensure
that results from using the definition are consistent
ING Business School Ref Unit 2-23
Operational Definitions
Defect – process output that is not acceptable to the customer; not within specificationDefect Opportunity – A point where a CCR could be missed each time something moves through a process
• An opportunity is a place where a defect can reasonably occur
• The number of defect opportunities is related to the complexity of the process.
• The number of defect opportunities per unit must stay constant before and after DMAIC improvement
(cont’d.)
ING Business School
Create operational definitions for your Outcome & Upstream Metrics.
Ref Unit 2-24
Activity
ING Business School
• Relates to the problem you’re studying – the data can be directly linked to the Preliminary Problem Statement
• Answers questions about current process performance – when is it occurring, who is involved, where is it occurring, what is happening, how is it happening
• Provides information about related conditions – a defect occurred on Thursday; on Thursday we were short-staffed; also on Thursday the system was down for 2 hours
• Cost effective – the value of the data collected is worth more than the cost of collecting the data
How Much Data to CollectHow Much Data to Collect
Ref Unit 2-25
Characteristics of Useful Data
ING Business School
Population -“N” Usually
unknown
Sample – “n”
Take a sample
To make inferences about…
Sampling is collecting some of the data from a process to make inferences about all of the data.
Ref Unit 2-26
Develop a Sampling Plan
ING Business School Ref Unit 2-27
Develop a Sampling Plan
Reliable Samples• The data is representative
of the population• Every item has a known
and usually equal chance of being included
• There are no systematic differences between the data you collect and the data you do not collect
Unreliable Samples• Samples are only
collected when/where convenient
• The sample collection method has a pattern
• The process changes during data collection
• Faulty measurements • Only a portion of people
you need data from respond to your request for information
(cont’d.)
ING Business School Ref Unit 2-28
Calculations and other information related to determining sample size is covered in BlackBelt training.
Develop a Sampling Plan
What does sample size depend upon?• Desired sampling error – how precise you
want to be (± 4%) • Desired confidence level – how confident
that true population rate falls between selected error rate (95%)
• Variation of the population – characteristics, make-up
• Size of the population – larger populations, larger sample
(cont’d.)
ING Business School
The use of tools in data analysis is critical – they help you visualize!
Ref Unit 2-29a
Tools for Collecting Data
• Gaps between process targets and actual performance
• Cycles and trends in process performance
ING Business School
Total
Liquidity Account
Bond Fund
Hedge Fund
2241222110
28IIII IIII IIIIIIII IIIII III54
11IIIIIIIIII7
4IIII13
17IIIIIIIIIIII IIII36
TotalBeneficiaryDate of issueCalculationSignature
# new accounts
Liquidity Account
Bond Fund
Hedge Fund
New Equity Issue
2241222110
28IIII IIII IIIIIIII IIIII III54
11IIIIIIIIII7
4IIII13
17IIIIIIIIIIII IIII36
TotalBeneficiaryDate of issueCalculationSignature
# new accounts
Pro
duct
60
Type of ErrorType of Error
Total
Liquidity Account
Bond Fund
Hedge Fund
2241222110
28IIII IIII IIIIIIII IIIII III54
11IIIIIIIIII7
4IIII13
17IIIIIIIIIIII IIII36
TotalBeneficiaryDate of issueCalculationSignature
# new accounts
Liquidity Account
Bond Fund
Hedge Fund
New Equity Issue
New Equity Issue
2241222110
28IIII IIII IIIIIIII IIIII III54
11IIIIIIIIII7
4IIII13
17IIIIIIIIIIII IIII36
TotalBeneficiaryDate of issueCalculationSignature
# new accounts
Pro
duct
60
Type of ErrorType of ErrorType of ErrorType of Error
Source: X files
Report Preparation Confirmation Checksheet
Step Done?
Completion DataPlanned date
Actual date
Planned duration
Project completed
Client review &approval
Final report, draft
Final report review
Final report revisions
Desktop publishing ofreport
Final report submission
6-12
6-17
6-30
7-12
7-21
7-28
7-30
6-26
7-6
7-21
7-28
8-2
Actualduration
5d
13d
12d
9d
7d
2d
10
15d
7d
5d
N/A N/A
Notes
Cust requestedchanges
Client personnelon vacation
Minor changesrequested
Source: X files
Correct cashier error OK check
Checkout Line DelaysCashier Date
Reason Frequency Comments
Price check needed
No cashier available
Register out of tape
Not enough money
Forgot item
Wrong item
Manager assistance needed
Other
Wendy May 19
Source: X files
Frequency Plot ChecksheetPackage Weight
16.0 16.1 16.2 16.3 16.4 16.5 16.6 16.7 16.8Weight in ounces
Source: X files
Ref Unit 2-29b/30
Checksheets
ING Business School
E E E E
E
R RR R RR
E E E E E
E E E E R R R E A
M M T MF
E E E E A E A E E A E EA E
E E E E EA E E A
E: Entry missingR: Receipt missingM: “Misc.” not explainedT: “Trans” no explainedA: Arithmetic error
Expense ReportName: _____________________ Week ending ___________ 20__July 2 05
Date ProjectCode
Hotel Trans Meals Misc Total Comments
Totals
Ref Unit 2-33
Concentration Diagram
ING Business School Ref Unit 2-32
Checksheets
Implementation• Are all appropriate, high
potential categories of data being considered?
• Is the right data being gathered?
• Does everyone understand how to fill out the checksheet?
• Has management clearance been given?
• Do the people being observed understand why the checksheet is being used?
Interpretation• Look for trends and
patterns in the data • Look for something
unusual • Other tools can be used
with the Checksheet to help interpret the data, e.g., line graph, pareto chart, etc.
• Extract summary data by sub-totaling, or stratifying the data
(cont’d.)
ING Business School
Create or review the data collection plan for your project.
Ref Unit 2-34
Activity
ING Business School
Data Collection Plan Project ________________________
How measured1
What questions do you want to answer?
Data Operational Definition and Procedures
What Measure type/ Data type
Related conditionsto record2
Sampling notes
Notes
1) Be sure to test and monitor any measurement procedures/instruments. 2) “Related factors” are stratification factors or potential causes you want to monitor as you collect data.
What is your plan for starting data collection? (attach details if necessary)
How will the data be displayed?(Sketch below)
How/where recorded (attach form)
Ref Unit 2-35
Activity (cont’d.)
ING Business School
Gather Initial Data
DEFINE MEASURE ANALYZE IMPROVE CONTROL
Create Detailed
Process Map
Stratify Data
Revise Problem
Statement
Assess Financial
Impact
Ref Unit 2-36a
Measure – Major Activities
ING Business School Ref Unit 2-36b
What is Stratification?
Stratification is classifying and separating data into related groups:
• Stratify Outcome Metric data sources of the gap
• Goal of stratification is a search for significance
• Use stratification to organize resources
• Stratification helps identify the value of the improvement
ING Business School
Answer Questions with DataAnswer Questions with Data
Ref Unit 2-37
% N
ot
Issu
ed o
n T
ime
Good
% of Policies Not Issued On Time
0%
2003 2004
Target = <2%
1st Qtr. 2nd Qtr. 3rd Qtr. 4th Qtr. 1st Qtr. 2nd Qtr. 3rd Qtr. 4th Qtr. 1st Qtr. 2nd Qtr.
5%
10%
20%
25%
1st Qtr. 2nd Qtr. 3rd Qtr. 4th Qtr. 1st Qtr. 2nd Qtr. 3rd Qtr. 4th Qtr. 1st Qtr. 2nd Qtr.
15%
GAP Source: X Files
2005 Period
% N
ot
Issu
ed o
n T
ime
Good
Stratify By Asking Questions
• When did the data spike, then go down?
• What are reasons for the data to cycle?
• Is it possible to track where the policies that took the longest were written?
• Who wrote the policies that were not issued on time?
• How did it happen?
ING Business School
200410-200502
non-Medical Exam Policies not issued on time
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
MissingInfo. on
Application
Unable tocontact agentwith question
Insufficientfollow up
Lack ofpremium
Secondrequirements
Delayed bydelivery
Large amount
coverage
System error0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
100.00%
N=149
Source: X files
Ref Unit 2-38
Pareto Chart
ING Business School Ref Unit 2-40
Interpreting Pareto Chart
• Isolate the significant few from the trivial many – example: 80% in first bar.
• The first category (bar) does not have to contain 80% of the total under analysis.
• A flat or somewhat level pareto chart usually means examine the data further.
• Stratify the data in different ways (frequency, severity, impact) in order to identify the most significant category.
• Ensure that each category has the same opportunity to contribute.
ING Business School
How else could this data be stratified?Reasons Proposals Take Longer Than 3 Days
To Present to Manager for Approval
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Wai
ting fo
r
price
info
.
Wai
ting fo
r
serv
ice
spec
s.
Not awar
e
of dea
dline
Resea
rchin
g
serv
ice
info
.
RFP not
assi
gned Other
# L
ate
Pro
po
sals
100%n = 80
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0%
50%
Sales & Marketing Dept.
Jan – Jun, 2003
Ref Unit 2-41
Pareto Practice
ING Business School
Complete Pareto analysis with data provided
Ref Unit 2-42a
Activity
ING Business School
48
40
30
20
10
0
XYZ Loan Processing
N = 48
12
Type of Error
10/23-27/01
Number of Defects
107 6 6
3 4
Not le
gibl
eSig
natu
reCal
cula
tion
Late
sub
mitt
alApp
rova
lM
issin
g in
fo.
Oth
er
100%
50%
25%
75%
Source: Loan Dept.10/23-27/99S. Martinez
Ref Unit 2-42b
Activity – Answer 1
ING Business School
Source: Loan Dept.10/23-27/99S. Martinez
XYZ Loan Processing - Cost of Defects
Extended Cost - Type of Defect
Not le
gibl
e
Appr
oval
Late
sub
mitt
al
Sign
atur
e
Calcul
atio
n
Oth
er
Missing
info
.
$3008
2500
2000
1500
1000
0
N = $3008
1158Co$t of Defects
469 456408 350
63 104
500
100%
50%
25%
75%
Ref Unit 2-42c
Activity – Answer 2
ING Business School
Fund Redemption
1998 1999J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
Period
GOOD
Fund Redemption
1998 1999J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
Period
GOOD
0
20
40
60
79
54
8 7 4 60%
25%
50%
75%
100%
Reasons
N = 79
Source: Fund Records
Fund Redemption - PerformanceJan.-Jul. 1999
0
20
40
60
79
54
8 7 4 60%
25%
50%
75%
100%
Reasons
N = 79
Source: Fund Records
Fund Redemption - PerformanceJan.-Jul. 1999
Fund Redemption
0
20
40
60
80
100Jan.-Jul. 1999
Source: Fund Records
19
100
75
50
0%
25
79
10 823
N = 139
Reasons
Fund Redemption
0
20
40
60
80
100Jan.-Jul. 1999
Source: Fund Records
19
100
75
50
0%
25
79
10 823
N = 139
Reasons
0
10
20
30
40
63 3 4
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%N = 5450
Source: Customer. Survey – 8/99
38
Fund Redemption – AwarenessJan.-Jul. 1999
54
Reasons
0
10
20
30
40
63 3 4
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%N = 5450
Source: Customer. Survey – 8/99
38
Fund Redemption – AwarenessJan.-Jul. 1999
54
Reasons
Ref Unit 2-44
Multi-level Stratification
ING Business School
Avg. Time Request to Patient Pickup
Avg. Request to Pickup Time (in minutes) at Holy Cross Hosp.Taken by Transporter Dispatcher Jan-Feb, 2004
Ref Unit 2-45a
Histogram
ING Business School
Claims Processing (Hours)
Frequency Total
1:00-2:30 32:31-4:00 12
4:01-5:30 16
5:31-7:00 117:01-8:30 68:31-10:00 110:01-11:30 1
TOTAL 50
Ref Unit 2-45b
Histogram/Frequency Chart
ING Business School Ref Unit 2-47
Histogram Interpretation
• Focus on the center of the data distribution
• Look at the data spread
• Consider the typical histogram shapes
ING Business School
Nothing unusual. Try to find causes of variation (data spread). Determine if data
is centered properly.
Stratify the data to avoid two populations of data; create two histograms.
Recalculate and draw the histogram again.
Investigate “outliers”. Determine why the data is not centered near the average.
Determine why part of the data is missing. Check your calculations.
Collect more data if necessary.
CLASSES OF DATA
FR
EQ
UE
NC
Y (y)
(x)
CLASSES OF DATA(x)F
RE
QU
EN
CY (y)
(x)
CLASSES OF DATA
(y)
(x)
FR
EQ
UE
NC
Y
(y)
(x)
FR
EQ
UE
NC
Y
CLASSES OF DATA
(y)
(x)FR
EQ
UE
NC
Y (y)
(x)
CLASSES OF DATA
(y)
FR
EQ
UE
NC
Y(y)
Normal
Bi-modal
Comb
Skewed
Precipice
Ref Unit 2-48/49
Histogram Interpretation (cont’d.)
ING Business School
# Days RFP's are Late
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101112131415161718192021
# Days Late
# o
f O
ccu
rren
ces
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101112131415161718192021
# Days RFP's are Late
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101112131415161718192021
# Days Late
# o
f O
ccu
rren
ces
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 101112131415161718192021
Would you change anything?
Ref Unit 2-50
Histogram Interpretation(cont’d.)
ING Business School
Days to Prepare Response
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10# Days to Prepare Response
# o
f O
ccu
rren
ces
X = 5.07
Days to Prepare Response
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10# Days to Prepare Response
# o
f O
ccu
rren
ces
XX = 5.07
How would you proceed?
Ref Unit 2-51
Histogram Interpretation(cont’d.)
ING Business School
Defects Defects
Too early Too late
Delivery Time
Reduce Variation
Delivery Time
Too early Too lateTarget Target
Spread of variation is too wide compared to customer
specifications
Spread of variation is narrow compared to
customer specifications
Less Variation is DesiredLess Variation is Desired
Expect Variation in Everything
Ref Unit 2-52
Understand Data Variation
ING Business School
Mean:The sum of the data set values, divided by the number of values in the data set.
)x(
)x~(
Measure Definition: Example:
(12,14,16,17,14,11,18,17,24,26,23,27,14,14)Ordered Data =(11,12,14,14,14,14,16,17,17,18,23,24,26,27)Mode = 14
(11,12,14,14,14,14,16,17,17,18,23,24,26,27)
(11,12,14,14,14,14,16,17,17,18,23,24,26,27)Median = (16 + 17)/2 = 33/2Median = 16.5
6.1714
247
14
)27...1211(
n
xxMean i
Mode:The most frequently occurring value in the data set
Median:The value that falls exactly in the middle of the ordered data set, half of the numbers fall above, and half below.
Ref Unit 2-53
Measures of Central Tendency
ING Business School
The data below are a sample of days of absence over a year in a department. Determine the mean, median, and mode of this sample:1, 2, 3, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, 11, 120
Mode =
Median =
Mean =
If this data set were handed to you to analyze, what might be your reaction?
3
5
15.9
Ref Unit 2-54
Activity – Calculating Central Tendency
ING Business School
minmax xx
1
)( 2
n
xxs i
Measure / Definition Example
Range - The difference between the highest and lowest (greatest and smallest) values.
(12,14,16,17,14,11,18,17, 24, 26, 23, 27, 14, 14)
Ordered Data = (11,12,14,14,14,14,16,17,17,18, 23, 24, 26, 27)
Range: (27 – 11) = ________
Standard Deviation (sd) – The calculated variation between each data point in the set and the mean.
(3,5,7,9,11,12,4,5,13,1,16)
Ordered Data = (1,3,4,5,5,7,9,11,12,13,16)
Xbar = ________
s = 4.73
Note: Standard deviation calculations are covered in BlackBelt training.
16
7.82
Ref Unit 2-55
Measures of Dispersion
ING Business School
68.26% of all data should fall within a distance of ±1sd from the mean95.45% within a distance of ±2sd from the mean99.73% with a distance of ±3sd from the mean
Ref Unit 2-56
The Empirical Rule
ING Business School
99.73% confidence level:Xbar = 5s = 1Upper range limit = 5+(3x1) or 8Lower range limit = 5 - (3x1) or 2
95.45% confidence level:Xbar = 5s = 1Upper range limit = 5+(2x1) or 7Lower range limit = 5 - (2x1) or 3
Ref Unit 2-57
Activity – Predicting Process Output
Assuming the average number of days to process a new insurance policy is 5, and the standard deviation is 1.
• How many days can you expect it to take to process a new insurance policy?
• In other words, within what range would you expect to find 99.73% of the data?
ING Business School
Special Cause: something different happening at a certain time or place
Common Cause: always present to some degree in the process
Ref Unit 2-58
Causes of Variation
ING Business School
UCL - Upper Control Limit
0
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Pro
cess
Met
ric
J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M
LCL - Lower Control Limit
Center Line, mean, or Xbar
10Control limits - calculated from data = ± 3 sd
Data points plotted over time
Data patterns are formed by two types of variation…Data patterns are formed by two types of variation…
Ref Unit 2-59
Control Charts
ING Business School
Common Cause Variation
0
10
20
30
40
50
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25
Special Cause
0
10
20
30
40
50
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25
Ref Unit 2-60
Control Charts
Common Causes• Inherent in any system• Process with only common causes:
stable, predictable, in control
Special Causes• Special, specific, assignable causes. • Process with common causes plus
factors that induce variation above that inherent to the system: unstable, unpredictable, not in statistical control
• 6 Signals that special causes are present
(cont’d.)
ING Business School
Ref Unit 2-61a
Control Charts
1. Point Outside Control LimitAny point on or outside the limits is abnormal and requires investigation
2. RunSeven points continually on one side of the center line is abnormal, Also, 10 out of 11, 12 out of 14 or 16 out of 20 points on one side of the center line is abnormal
3. TrendingSeven points in a continuous upward or downward direction is abnormal
(cont’d.)
6 Signals of Special Cause
ING Business School
Ref Unit 2-61b
Control Charts
4. Approaching CL (hugging)Most points within center line and 1.5σ* indicates mixing of data from different populations, making the control limits too wide and stratification necessary
5. CyclingAny repeated up and down trend is abnormal and requires investigation
6. Approaching Control Limits2 of 3 points outside 2σ(σ= standard deviation) line is abnormal
6 Signals of Special Cause
(cont’d.)
ING Business School
Notice that the control limits are more narrow after variation is reduced. Can you explain why?
Goal of Process Improvement
Ref Unit 2-62
Additional information related to control charts is covered in BlackBelt training.
Control Charts (cont’d.)
ING Business School
70
80
90
100
110
120
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35
UCL
LCL
Upper Spec
Lower Spec
Ref Unit 2-63
Control Limits, Specifications & Targets
• Control limits (VOP)• Calculated from the data• Describe what the process
is capable of achieving
• Specification limits (VOC)• Set by the customer,
management, or other requirements• Describe what you want a process to achieve
• Target lines (VOB)• Based on objectives external to the process• Not statistically calculated (not shown)
ING Business School
LSL USL
Not In Control( Not Stable)
In Control(Stable)
Not meeting Customer
Specifications(Not Capable)
Meeting Customer
Specifications(Capable)
CustomerSpecification
Control Limit
LSL USLLSL USL
LSL USL
Voice of the Process
Vo
ice
of
the
Cu
sto
mer
Ref Unit 2-64
Possible Process Conditions
ING Business School
Stratify Upstream Data to Search for Significant Contributors to the GAP in
the Outcome Metric
Ref Unit 2-65
Activity
ING Business School
DEFINE MEASURE ANALYZE IMPROVE CONTROL
Create Detailed
Process Map
Gather Initial Data
Stratify Data
Revise Problem
Statement
Assess Financial
Impact
Ref Unit 2-66a
Measure – Major Activities
ING Business School
Final Problem Statement: 77% non-MedExampolices not issued on time involved missing or unclear information on the policy application.
200410-200502Non-MedExam Policies not Issued on Time
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
MissingInfo. on
application
Unable to contact agent with question
Not follow upor not follow
up enough
Lack ofpremium
Secondrequirements
Delayed bydelivery
Large amountcoverage
System error0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
100.00%
N=149
Data you have collected and stratified so far focuses your project on the most significant
reasons for the performance gap.
Ref Unit 2-66b
Revise Problem Statement
ING Business School
DO
Ref Unit 2-67a
Revise Problem Statement
• Make sure problem is of size/scope that is solvable
• State the problem in quantitative measurable terms
(cont’d.)
ING Business School
DO Not
Ref Unit 2-67b
Revise Problem Statement
• State a preconceived idea of what the cause(s) may be
• Imply a particular solution
• Affix blame on a person or group
(cont’d.)
ING Business School
Preliminary Problem StatementRevised Problem Statements are
more Focused
New products miss target launch dates 45% of the time.
Nine out of the last ten new bond funds missed target launch dates
by an more than three months.
20% of late payments come from product XYZ customers
85% of product XYZ customers in the U.S. account for 75% of
late payments.
Storage personnel are involved in 75% of back strain cases,
Storage personnel were lifting something when 92% of the back
strain cases occurred.
Ref Unit 2-68
Narrow the Focus
Revise Problem Statement(cont’d.)
ING Business School
Identify good problem statements
Ref Unit 2-69
Activity
ING Business School Ref Unit 2-70a
Calculate Process Sigma
What is Process Sigma? • A reflection of the variation in your process
• Based on the “Yield” - how much of your process output is within specification, e.g., acceptable to the customer
• Requires operational definitions for both defects and defect opportunities
• Calculated for the outcome metric(s)
• Related to the revised problem statement
• Determined using a table
ING Business School Ref Unit 2-70b
Calculate Process Sigma
1. Compute First Time Right yield (see Lean Six Sigma Overview, page 16)% YIELD = 1 – (defects / total defect opportunities) X 100
2. Look up % YIELD in a Process Sigma Table (Appendix)
Example:
Assume 100 units, 5 opportunities, 7 defects% YIELD = (1 – 7 / (5 x 100)) X 100% YIELD = (1 – (7 / 500) X 100% YIELD = (1 – .014) X 100% YIELD = 98.6%, and 3.7 Process Sigma
ING Business School Ref Unit 2-71
Calculate Process Sigma
Process Sigma Target • If process sigma is greater than 3.0, set a 2x
defect improvement goal e.g., 1,000 DPMO to 500 DPMO.
• If process sigma is less than 3.0, set a 10x defect improvement goal e.g., 1,000 DPMO to 100 DPMO.
ING Business School
Develop a Revised Problem Statement, Calculate Process Sigma,
Establish an Improvement Target
Ref Unit 2-72
Activity
ING Business School
DEFINE MEASURE ANALYZE IMPROVE CONTROL
Create Detailed
Process Map
Gather Initial Data
Stratify Data
Revise Problem
Statement
Assess Financial
Impact
Ref Unit 2-73
Measure – Major Activities
ING Business School Ref Unit 2-74
Cost of Poor Quality (COPQ)
• COPQ is the sum of costs to maintain or satisfy customer requirements after a defect has occurred.
• Understanding process COPQ will help identify the financial impact of the project.
Get help, if needed.
ING Business School
Conformance (Value-Adding)
Appraisal costs (necessary, value adding)
Prevention costs
Non-conformance(Non-Value- Adding)
Appraisal costs (not needed, non-value- adding)
Internal failure costs
External failure costs
Ref Unit 2-75
Types of Costs
Cost of Poor Quality(cont’d.)
ING Business School Ref Unit 2-76
Cost of Poor Quality
Appraisal Costs - May be Non-Value- Adding or Value-Adding
• Maintenance/calibration of inspection/test equipment or procedures
• Materials/supplies used in inspection/test• Incoming inspection/test• In-process inspection/test• Final inspection/test• Product/service audits
ING Business School
Internal External
•Inspections or tests•Rework•Avoidable process losses•Down time/Delays •Sorting•Failure analysis •Repair•Waste
•Complaint handling/adjustment•Returned items•Failure analysis•Warranties and Allowances •Lost business•Lost sales•Lost customers •Waste
Ref Unit 2-77
Failure Costs – Non-Value Add
Cost of Poor Quality (cont’d.)
ING Business School Ref Unit 2-78
Cost of Poor Quality
Prevention Costs – Value Adding • New product review• Process quality planning• Process control• Quality system audits• Training• Supplier review and qualification• Fool proofing so defects cannot be made, e.g.,
automatic seat-belt restraints
(cont’d.)
ING Business School Ref Unit 2-79
Cost of Poor Quality
Project Benefits
• See calculations from Define step.• Add newly identified benefits.• See list in workbook.
(cont’d.)
ING Business School
Estimate of Project Annual Financial Impact
Benefit total: (+)
COPQ total:
Conformance (forecast of value-adding costs)
(-)
Non-conformance (forecast of non-value-adding cost reductions)
(+)
Project total:
Ref Unit 2-80
Cost of Poor Quality
Financial Impact Summary • Estimate annual impact• Indicate if increasing stream of benefits• Save worksheets
(cont’d.)
ING Business School Ref Unit 2-81
What costs are Involved in Your Project?
Activity
ING Business School Ref Unit 2-82
Measure Step Tollgate Questions
A. Does the process map clearly convey responsibility for each activity?
B. What is the plan for data collection?
C. How has the data been documented?
D. How was the data stratified to identify any significant reasons for the preliminary problem statement?
E. What is the revised problem statement?
F. What is the forecast financial impact of the project?
ING Business School Ref Unit 2-83a
Unit Summary
Having completed this unit, here are some questions you should be able to answer:
1. What are two types of data?
2. List four sources of data to be addressed in a data collection plan.
3. Name three tools that can be used to collect and stratify data?
4. What should not be included in a revised problem statement? What should?
5. What are three types of costs to be addressed in a COPQ assessment?
6. How is a control chart different from a run chart?
ING Business School
Calculate Performance
Stratify Data
Frequency Plots
UCL
LCL
UCL
LCL
Run Chart
Plot Outcome Defect Data
A
Mary
John
Sally
Jim
B C E
Develop Data Collection Plan
Data Collection Plan Project ________________________
What questions do you want to answer?
Data Operational Definition and Procedures What Measure
type/ Data type
How Measured 1
Related conditions to
record 2
Sampling notes
How/where recorded (attach
form)
Create Detailed Process Map
F1
F3
F4
F2
Assess Financial
Impact (COPQ)
Revise Problem
Statement
Control Chart
Check Sheet
Collect Upstream Data
Overall objective: Narrow the improvement opportunity to a specific problem statement. Overall objective: Narrow the improvement opportunity to a specific problem statement.
DPMO_____
Yield _____
Sigma _____
Goal _____
Understand Variation
Pareto Chart
To Analyze Step
From Define Step
Ref Unit 2-83b
Project Components: MEASURE