Leadership Problem Solving Creates More Problems than it Solves. The Ambiguity Advantage
description
Transcript of Leadership Problem Solving Creates More Problems than it Solves. The Ambiguity Advantage
Leadership Problem Solving Creates More
Problems than it Solves. The Ambiguity Advantage
David WilkinsonCentre i
RAF Leadership Conference
2007 Centre iCentre iinspire inspire innovate innovate influence influence 1
The Book
2007 Centre iCentre iinspire inspire innovate innovate influence influence 2
Ambiguous Decisions
• A look at problem solving success in ambiguous situations
• 161 Leaders in 42 organisations
• 2001 – 2007
2007 Centre iCentre iinspire inspire innovate innovate influence influence 3
Ambiguity
2007 Centre iCentre iinspire inspire innovate innovate influence influence 4
Where the problem or
solution or path is not known
Where the problem or
solution or path is not known
Leader’s Problem Solving
2007 Centre iCentre iinspire inspire innovate innovate influence influence 5
42 organisations between 2001 – 2007 Wilkinson 2007
Leaders Views
• 96.2% (155 of 161) of leaders said that their problem solving was successful.
• Any failures they said, came from somewhere or someone else.
2007 Centre iCentre iinspire inspire innovate innovate influence influence 6
Every one else’s view
• 81% of leader problem solving failed / got ditched…or result in unintended consequences so severe that they were worse or as worse as the original problem.
2007 Centre iCentre iinspire inspire innovate innovate influence influence 7
8 out of 10 cats
• 8 out of 10 leadership decisions / solutions didn’t resolve the issue*
• Less than 4% of leaders considered that their thinking and actions contributed to the failure situation
2007 Centre iCentre iinspire inspire innovate innovate influence influence 8
Why?
2007 Centre iCentre iinspire inspire innovate innovate influence influence 9
Two Faced
2007 Centre iCentre iinspire inspire innovate innovate influence influence 10
Processing
2007 Centre iCentre iinspire inspire innovate innovate influence influence 11
The Ambiguity Pretzel
2007 Centre iinspire innovate influence 12
Certainty / minimum ambiguity
Chaos
Increasing ambiguity / risk & uncertainty
Risk
Increasing certainty / clarity / knowledge & order
Uncertainty & VaguenessVagueness
Breakdown of relationship > Cause & Effect
Close coupledC & E
Loose coupled C & E
Total Ambiguity Paradox
The Paradox of Certainty
Control models
Emergent / complexity models
Abmgiiuty and our brinas
I tihnk taht you shulod be albe raed tihs wihuott too mcuh trubole. It is vrey stnarge taht wehn you trun aournd the cneter letetrs of wrods you can stlil raed tehm eailsy.
Amgiibuty gtes caclenled out by the biran wehn it is clsoe to a reiltay we unredtsnad. Tihs can be a prbolem as wlel as a uesufl phnemonena.
Waht haepnps is taht our biran makes, waht is knwon as ‘brdignig inrefneecs’,
It lokos for paetrtns and tehn tires to mkae sesne of waht it fidns bsaed on waht we alerady konw. Hoewveer it can go worgng! Esepiclaly in totlaly new siuttaoins. The biran wlil try to imopse a ptaetrn whcih is eihter sipmly oudttaed or jsut plian wrnog.
2007 Centre iCentre iinspire inspire innovate innovate influence influence 13
Rty siht….
I kihtn hatt shti udlosh eb a elltit erdarh ot edra sa I avhe exdim het teterls pu orme hhciw sakem ti a tol daherr ot erda. Hawt hist emns si hatt mose eoppel illw eigv pu ude ot eht velle fo itimagyub ti treacse ofr emth. Dod s’itn ti ?
2007 Centre iCentre iinspire inspire innovate innovate influence influence 14
Psychological Inertia
Aka paradigm paralysis
2007 Centre iCentre iinspire inspire innovate innovate influence influence 15
Paradigm Paralysis
The fog of war lessons learnt by Robert S. McNamara
2007 Centre iCentre iinspire inspire innovate innovate influence influence 16
Modes of Leadership
2007 Centre iCentre iinspire inspire innovate innovate influence influence 17
Technical Leadership (Mode 1)
• Good at– Following ‘characterised’
procedures– Making incremental
changes– Postponing reward– Staying safe– Standardising
procedures– Leading from the front– Detail
• Struggles with– Risk & Ambiguity– Innovation– Diversity– Non standard thinking– Empathy and emotional
intelligence– Co-operation and
collaboration– Strategic concepts (big
picture)
2007 Centre iCentre iinspire inspire innovate innovate influence influence 18
Mode 1 responses to Ambiguity
1. There is only one certainty1. Be certain about your certainty
2. Do something else1. Displacement behaviour2. Flight behaviour
3. If in doubt fool yourself1. Denial2. Create a new certainty
2007 Centre iCentre iinspire inspire innovate innovate influence influence 19
Cooperative Leadership (Mode 2)
• Good at– Minimising risks– Using others as
resources– Team focus– Solving cooperative
problems– Democracy– Listening– Task Focus– Diversity
• Struggles with– Taking risks– Conflict– Weighing up the facts– Competing values and
ideas– High innovation– Lack of change– Too much change
2007 Centre iCentre iinspire inspire innovate innovate influence influence 20
Mode 2 responses to ambiguity
• Heightened awareness of negative emotional reactions to ambiguity
• Moves to reduce discomfort• Conflict = discomfort• Tries to reduce ambiguity and conflict by– Simplification– Appeals to cohesion and loyalty (the team)– Cooperative strategies– Behavioural frameworks etc. that promote compliance
• Creation of rules / policy – reduction of uncertainty
2007 Centre iCentre iinspire inspire innovate innovate influence influence 21
Collaborative Leadership (Mode 3)
• Good at– Aligning values– Equality– Meetings– Relationships– Feel good– Empathy– Emotional Intelligence– Consensus– Exploring risk– Greater levels of ambiguity
• Struggles with– Leadership– Lack of productivity– Difficult people
• Individualists
– Breaking out of COWDUNG– Lack of change– Non conventional thinking
at first
2007 Centre iCentre iinspire inspire innovate innovate influence influence 22
Mode 3 reactions to ambiguity
• Recognise the ambiguity• Adapt to the situation• Interest in change (of others)• Will seek recourse to the consensus of the
group/team• Will try to ‘solve’ ambiguity to restore the
natural order of things
2007 Centre iCentre iinspire inspire innovate innovate influence influence 23
Generative Leadership (Mode 4)
• Good at– Working with Ambiguity– Complexity– Finding opportunity– Agility and change– Speed– Innovation– Focus– Using experts– Defining problems– Emotional Resilience– Learning and unlearning –
shifting paradigm
• Struggles with– Working with certainty– Lack of change & stability– People who need time
• To understand• Change• Produce things
– Procedures, policy and rules
– Incremental change– Lack of speed and agility– ‘Small talk’
2007 Centre iCentre iinspire inspire innovate innovate influence influence 24
Mode 4 reactions to ambiguity
• Very happy with the existence of ambiguity – worries if it’s not present
• Looks for emergent properties and opportunities inherent in situation
• Spends lots of time on problem definition and trying to discover reality
• Uses diversity of thinking and approaches to gain the advantage
2007 Centre iCentre iinspire inspire innovate innovate influence influence 25
A problem of definition
The elevators are too slow
2007 Centre iCentre iinspire inspire innovate innovate influence influence 26
Frame 1
Technical - Make it faster
2007 Centre iCentre iinspire inspire innovate innovate influence influence 27
Frame 2
Co-operate – what solutions?
Best – pulley gearing
2007 Centre iCentre iinspire inspire innovate innovate influence influence 28
Frame 3
Collaboration –many Project teams many
inventions
2007 Centre iCentre iinspire inspire innovate innovate influence influence 29
Frame 4
• Most people spend 90% of effort working on solution
• Generative spend 20% of effort working on solution.
• 80% on the problem definition
2007 Centre iCentre iinspire inspire innovate innovate influence influence 30
Albert Einstein
“It's not that I'm so smart, it's just that I stay with
problems longer”
“I spend most of my time just trying to find out what the problem
is.”
2007 Centre iCentre iinspire inspire innovate innovate influence influence 31
Problem definition
2007 Centre iCentre iinspire inspire innovate innovate influence influence 32
They think the lift is too slow
1. Install mirrors - $38
2. Level progress indication
3. Bigger compartments
2007 Centre iCentre iinspire inspire innovate innovate influence influence 33
Frames
1. Thinking frame = how we see
2. How we see = what we see
3. What we see = the problems we perceive
4. The problems we perceive = the problem we solve
2007 Centre iCentre iinspire inspire innovate innovate influence influence 34
David WilkinsonCentre I
2007 Centre iCentre iinspire inspire innovate innovate influence influence 35