Lead Evaluator Training

44
Lead Evaluator Training 2012-2013 Day 4

description

Lead Evaluator Training. 2012-2013 Day 4. Agenda. What have you been up to? How are you doing with the SLOs? Mini-lesson: Six shifts in ELA/Literacy Your Evidence collection Evidence collection and a rubric Managing mini-observations Growth-Producing Feedback. Lead Evaluator BINGO. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Lead Evaluator Training

Page 1: Lead Evaluator Training

Lead Evaluator Training

2012-2013Day 4

Page 2: Lead Evaluator Training

Agenda• What have you been up to? How are you

doing with the SLOs?• Mini-lesson: Six shifts in ELA/Literacy• Your Evidence collection• Evidence collection and a rubric• Managing mini-observations• Growth-Producing Feedback

Page 3: Lead Evaluator Training

Lead Evaluator BINGO• Listen for the words or terms on your

BINGO card• Cross of those things you hear in the

training• Shout “BINGO” when

you have a BINGO

Page 4: Lead Evaluator Training

The Year at a Glance

Beginning of the Year

• Beginning of the year meeting

• Standards I and II

• SLO and local (LAT) target setting

End of the Year• Evidence from

the year collected• Compare

collected evidence to the rubric

• Summative score determination and communication

Ongoing

• Evidence Submission by Teacher

• Evidence Collection

• Sharing the evidence

• Feedback Conversations

Page 5: Lead Evaluator Training

SLO Setting• What’s been your meeting strategy?• What’s the status?• How are you keeping track?• How’s the culture?

Page 6: Lead Evaluator Training

SLO Celebration• When the SLO setting is over, is that worth

recognition? Celebration?• What are some of the ways you do things

in school to keep things positive?

Page 7: Lead Evaluator Training

ELA/literacy and theCommon Core

Page 8: Lead Evaluator Training

Six Shifts of ELA/literacy• A quick look at an engageNY video• Publishers criteria has more info• November 2011 issue of NTnews• Before/after examples of the shifts

Page 9: Lead Evaluator Training

Balancing Informational & Literary Texts (Grades PK-5)

Knowledge in the Disciplines (Grades 6-12)

Staircase of Complexity

Text-based Answers

Writing from Sources

Academic Vocabulary

Six Shifts: ELA/Literacy

Page 10: Lead Evaluator Training

SHIFT 1Balancing

Informational and

Literary Texts

SHIFT 2Building

Knowledge in the

Disciplines

Core Text

Pre-CCL

S

Page 11: Lead Evaluator Training

SHIFT 1Balancing

Informational and

Literary Texts

SHIFT 2Building

Knowledge in the

Disciplines

Paired Texts: The Hero’s Journey

Core Texts

Post-

CCLS

Page 12: Lead Evaluator Training

SHIFT 3Staircase of Complexity

Refusal of the Call

Often when the call [to adventure] is given, the future hero refuses to heed it. This may be from a sense of duty or obligation, fear, insecurity, a sense of inadequacy, or any of a range of reasons that work to hold the person in his or her current circumstances.

Pre-CCL

S

Page 13: Lead Evaluator Training

SHIFT 3

Staircase of

Complexity

Refusal of the CallOften in actual life, and not infrequently in the myths and popular tales, we encounter the dull case of the call unanswered; for it is always possible to turn the ear to other interests. Refusal of the summons converts the adventure into its negative. Walled in boredom, hard work, or "culture," the subject loses the power of significant affirmative action and becomes a victim to be saved. His flowering world becomes a wasteland of dry stones and his life feels meaningless—even though, like King Minos, he may through titanic effort succeed in building an empire of renown. Whatever house he builds, it will be a house of death: a labyrinth of cyclopean walls to hide from him his Minotaur. All he can do is create new problems for himself and await the gradual approachof his disintegration.

Excerpt from The Hero with a Thousand Faces

Post-

CCLS

Page 14: Lead Evaluator Training

SHIFT 4Text-based

Answers

Question:

What reasons might a hero use to refuse the call to adventure?

Refusal of the Call

Often when the call [to adventure] is given, the future hero refuses to heed it. This may be from a sense of duty or obligation, fear, insecurity, a sense of inadequacy, or any of a range of reasons that work to hold the person in his or her current circumstances.

Pre-CCL

S

Page 15: Lead Evaluator Training

SHIFT 4Text-based

Answers

Question:

What fate awaits the (future) hero who refuses the call to adventure?

Use specific examples from the text to support your answer.

Refusal of the CallOften in actual life, and not infrequently in the myths and popular tales, we encounter the dull case of the call unanswered; for it is always possible to turn the ear to other interests. Refusal of the summons converts the adventure into its negative. Walled in boredom, hard work, or "culture," the subject loses the power of significant affirmative action and becomes a victim to be saved. His flowering world becomes a wasteland of dry stones and his life feels meaningless—even though, like King Minos, he may through titanic effort succeed in building an empire of renown. Whatever house he builds, it will be a house of death: a labyrinth of cyclopean walls to hide from him his Minotaur. All he can do is create new problems for himself and await the gradual approachof his disintegration.

Excerpt from The Hero with a Thousand Faces

Post-

CCLS

Page 16: Lead Evaluator Training

SHIFT 5

Writing from

Sources

Write about a time you had to make a difficult decision.

Describe the situation and the

heroic qualities you exhibited.

Pre-CCL

S

Page 17: Lead Evaluator Training

SHIFT 5

Writing from

Sources

Write a critical essay in which you discuss The Odyssey and

The Lost City of Z from the perspective provided in the Critical Lens. In your essay:

Provide a valid

interpretation of the

statement.

Agree or disagree with the

statement as you’ve

interpreted it.

Support your opinion

using specific

references from the

two works listed

above.

Critical LensNothing is given to man on earth – struggle is built into the nature of life, and conflict is possible - the hero is the man who lets no obstacle prevent him from pursuing the values he has chosen.

Post-

CCLS

Page 18: Lead Evaluator Training

SHIFT 6

Academic Vocabular

y

Pre-CCLS

Archetype

Epic Poetry

Mythology

Odyssey

Pre-CCL

S

Page 19: Lead Evaluator Training

SHIFT 6

Academic Vocabular

y

Tier 3 Words

Archetype

Epic Poetry

Mythology

Odyssey

Tier 2 Words

Summons

Affirmative

Titanic

Disintegration

Post-

CCLS

Page 20: Lead Evaluator Training

What does this mean for teachers?

What does this mean for leaders?

Page 21: Lead Evaluator Training

Think about this activity; discuss in your table group:• Would you do this activity with

teachers?• What would it accomplish?

Page 22: Lead Evaluator Training

The Power ofMini-Observations

Page 23: Lead Evaluator Training

The Year at a Glance

Beginning of the Year

• Beginning of the year meeting

• Standards I and II

• SLO and local (LAT) target setting

End of the Year• Evidence from

the year collected• Compare

collected evidence to the rubric

• Summative score determination and communication

Ongoing

• Evidence Submission by Teacher

• Evidence Collection

• Sharing the evidence

• Feedback Conversations

Page 24: Lead Evaluator Training

COLLECTDATA

(Evidence)

Conversation,Questions &Discussion

Respect &Rapport

Conclusions

Impact on learning…Support needed…

Page 25: Lead Evaluator Training

• Being organized and systematic about getting into all classrooms on a regular basis

• Not announcing visits in order to get a representative sampling of teachers’ work

• Keeping visits to five to ten minutes in order to boost frequency and observe each teacher at least every two or three weeks

Kim says:Essentials of

Mini-Observations

Page 26: Lead Evaluator Training

• Giving prompt, thoughtful, face-to-face feedback to the teacher after every observation

• Making visits and follow-up informal and low-stakes to maximize adult learning

Kim says:Essentials of

Mini-Observations

Page 27: Lead Evaluator Training

• Being organized and systematic about getting into all classrooms on a regular basis

• Not announcing visits in order to get a representative sampling of teachers’ work

• Keeping visits to five to ten minutes in order to boost frequency and observe each teacher at least every two or three weeks

Kim says:Essentials of

Mini-Observations

Page 28: Lead Evaluator Training

• Giving prompt, thoughtful, face-to-face feedback to the teacher after every observation

• Making visits and follow-up informal and low-stakes to maximize adult learning

Kim says:Essentials of

Mini-Observations

Page 29: Lead Evaluator Training

• Getting an accurate sense of the quality of instruction students are experiencing on a daily basis

• Seeing students in an instructional setting and get to know their strengths and needs

Kim says:Essentials of

Mini-Observations

Page 30: Lead Evaluator Training

• Getting to know teachers better, both as instructors and as people

• Developing “situational awareness” – having a finger on the pulse of the school’s culture and climate

Kim says:Essentials of

Mini-Observations

Page 31: Lead Evaluator Training

• Building trust, the lubricant of effective schools

• Identifying teachers who are having difficulty so they can get additional support

Kim says:Essentials of

Mini-Observations

Page 32: Lead Evaluator Training

• Developing a de-bureaucratized, informal style that facilitates collegial learning

• Being well-informed for meetings with the leadership team, teacher teams, and parents

Kim says:Essentials of

Mini-Observations

Page 33: Lead Evaluator Training

Gathering lots of data for end-of-year teacher evaluations

Kim says:Essentials of

Mini-Observations

Page 34: Lead Evaluator Training
Page 35: Lead Evaluator Training

# of teachers you have _____

÷ by the # of administrators you have

= _____

÷ by 4

= the number of days for a cycle in your building

Page 36: Lead Evaluator Training

Qualities of Growth-Producing Feedback?

– From Man on Fire, what arethe qualities ofGrowth-Producing Feedback?

– Take a look atPaula Rutherford’s list

– Check out a teacher-principalconversation

36

Page 37: Lead Evaluator Training

Checking in with Kim– Read what Kim has to say about

feedback to teachers– Discuss as a table group: how

does his advice compare toyour walkthrough/mini experiences?

37

Page 80

Page 38: Lead Evaluator Training

Conversations (example)– Form a triad– Each person gets a different colored half-

sheet– Prepare your opening line (<30 seconds)– First triad member says opening line to

the two others– Two others give first person feedback– Repeat the process until everyone in the

group has gone

38

Page 39: Lead Evaluator Training

Conversations– Do a mini-observation– Collect Evidence– Prepare your thoughts for your follow-up

conversation with the teacher. Make sure you have your opening line ready!

– Role-play the conversation.– Repeat.

39

Page 40: Lead Evaluator Training

COLLECTDATA

(Evidence)

Conversation,Questions &Discussion

Respect &Rapport

Conclusions

Impact on learning…Support needed…

Page 41: Lead Evaluator Training

Resources

Page 42: Lead Evaluator Training

Next Session• November 2nd in Syracuse

• Agenda will include– Evidence Collection– Ongoing Growth-Producing Feedback

Page 43: Lead Evaluator Training

QuestionsVisiting the Parking LotHits, Misses, and Suggestions

Page 44: Lead Evaluator Training

Evidence and a Rubric– Individually, use the evidence at the

bottom of the page to identify levels on the rubric (3.2)

– Debrief with your elbow partner? How did it go?

44

Element 3.2: Teacher communicates clearly and accurately with students to maximize their understanding and learning. NYSED Indicators: Students understand directions and procedures. Teachers use a variety of questioning techniques to advance student learning a nd reflection. Students’ comments and questions are acknowledged and utilized to advance learning. Students understand lesson co ntent through teachers’ use of oral, written and graphic methods. Adjust communication in response to student needs.

Indicators Ineffective Developing Effective Highly Effective A. Provides directions and

procedures

Teacher directions and procedures are confusing to students. Teacher does not adjust explanation to meet student needs.

Teacher directions and procedures are clarified after initial student confusion. Teacher attempts to adjust explanations to meet student needs.

Teacher directions and procedures are clear to students. Teacher adjusts explanations to meet student needs.

Teacher directions and procedures are clear, complete, and anticipate possible student misunderstanding. Teacher adjusts explanations to meet the needs of individual students.

B. Uses questioning techniques

Teacher’s questions are largely closed in nature. Questions do not invite a thoughtful response or further discussion.

Teacher’s questions are a combination of open and closed questions. Some questions invite a thoughtful response and/or further discussion.

Most of teacher’s questions are open in nature and engage students in deeper thinking and further discussion.

Teacher’s questions are open in nature and challenge students to think and demonstrate reasoning. Students formulate many questions to advance their understanding.

C. Responds to students

Teacher ignores students’ questions/comments and/or provides a response that shuts down student learning.

Teacher responds to some students’ questions/comments. Response gives students the answer rather than challenge student thinking.

Teacher responds to students’ questions/comments. Responses challenge student thinking.

Teacher and students respond to students’ questions/comments. Responses challenge all students’ thinking.

D. Communicates content

Teacher’s spoken language is inaudible, and/or written language is illegible. Spoken or written language contains errors. Graphic methods are not used or used ineffectively.

Teacher’s spoken language is audible, and written language is legible. Both are used correctly. Graphic methods are used occasionally.

Teacher’s spoken and written language is clear and correct. Graphic methods are used regularly to enhance content understanding.

Teacher’s spoken and written language is correct and expressive. Graphic methods are used regularly to enhance content understanding. Students offer their own graphic representation of the content.

Collected Evidence:

Teacher called on students who raised their hand. Teacher asked: “Who wrote the piece we just listened to?” Teacher asked: “In which period does this piece belong?” When student answered incorrectly she called on another volunteer. Teacher asked: “How do you know?” Teacher finished student’s explanation for her. Teacher asked: “What other pieces we have heard does this remind you of?” Teacher told students to draw a picture of which season the music reminded them. Teacher told student who didn’t have anything to write with to borrow from a neighbor. When one table group wasn’t doing drawing, teacher came over, repeated directions, and students went to work. Teacher called on volunteers to share their drawing with the class. Teacher called on some students once and some twice; those who didn’t raise their hand were not called on at all