LCE 2016 BERLIN - ecoPROSYS Presentation by A.J. Baptista
-
Upload
antonio-j-baptista -
Category
Environment
-
view
22 -
download
0
Transcript of LCE 2016 BERLIN - ecoPROSYS Presentation by A.J. Baptista
22nd – 24th May 2016
Organized by: In cooperation with: Sponsored by:
ecoPROSYS: An eco-efficiency framework applied to a medium density fiberboard finishing line
A.J. Baptista, E.J. Lourenço, J.P. Pereira, F. Cunha, E.J. Silva, P. Peças
António J Baptista
Page 2
AGENDA
Introduction
ecoPROSYS methodology description
Case study description and results
Conclusions and remarks
Page 3
Introduction
Objectives
• Identification and evaluation of unit processes and production systems for its eco-efficiency performance
• Connection of the eco efficiency principles with the appropriate environmental aspect
• Identification and quantification of the variable(s) or key aspect(s) that affect eco-efficiency performance;
• Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Cost Assessment integration
• Identification of the significant environmental aspects;
• Definition of eco-efficiency improvement strategies;
• Quantification of eco efficiency performance variations / evolution
Eco-Efficiency Integrated Methodology for Production Systems: ecoPROSYS©
Page 4
Introduction
ecoPROSYS© is a new eco-efficiency approach that comprehends the continuous joint developments of a team of entities integrated in the PRODUTECH Cluster
Page 5
Reduce material intensity
Reduce energy intensity
Reduce dispersion of toxic substances
Enhance recyclability
Maximize use of renewable resources
Extend product durability
Increase service intensity
7 Principles
Eco-EfficiencyProduct, process or service value
Environmental influence=
Introduction
ecoPROSYS methodology description
Page 6
Eco-Efficiency Profile
Process Mapping
Goal and Scope DefinitionDetermination of system boundaries
Identification and sequence of stagesDefinition of functional unit
Definition of system model (flows)
ProcessMapping
ecoPROSYS methodology description
Page 7
Eco-Efficiency Profile
ProcessMapping
• Environmental Performance Assessment (EPA)
• Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)
• Value Modelling
ecoPROSYS Pillars:
ecoPROSYS methodology description
Page 8
No Eco-efficiency PrincipleLow
intensityIntense
Highintensity
P1 Reduce material intensity 1 3 5
P2 Reduce energy intensity 1 3 5
P3 Reduce dispersion of toxic substances 1 3 5
P4 Enhance recyclability 1 3 5
P5 Maximize use of renewable resources 1 3 5
P6 Extend product durability 1 3 5
P7 Increase service intensity 1 3 5
EPA – Input Flows
Aspect Group Aspect P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 F S R E
Materials Paint 5 1 3 3 1 5 1 5 5 25 3
Materials Hardener 5 1 3 3 1 5 1 5 5 25 3
Energy Electricity 1 5 3 1 3 1 1 5 5 25 5
EPA – Output Flows
Aspect Group Aspect P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 F S R E
ResiduesPaint
Packaging3 1 5 5 1 1 1 3 5 15 3
ResiduesHardenerPackaging
3 1 5 5 1 1 1 3 5 15 3
Air emissions VOC 3 1 5 5 1 1 1 3 5 15 3
Environmental intensity and significance Parameterization
F = Frequency
S = Severity
R = Risk = F * S
E = Extension
ISO 1
40
01
Environmental Performance Assessment
ecoPROSYS methodology description
Page 9
No Eco-efficiency PrincipleLow
intensityIntense
High intensity
P1 Reduce material intensity 1 3 5
P2 Reduce energy intensity 1 3 5
P3 Reduce dispersion of toxic substances 1 3 5
P4 Enhance recyclability 1 3 5
P5 Maximize use of renewable resources 1 3 5
P6 Extend product durability 1 3 5
P7 Increase service intensity 1 3 5
Significance = P * R * E
Significance Analysis – Input flows
Aspect Group Aspect P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7
Materials Paint HS LS S S LS HS LS
Materials Hardener HS LS S S LS HS LS
Energy Electricity LS HS HS LS HS LS LS
Significance Analysis – Output flows
Aspect Group Aspect P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7
Residues Paint Packaging LS LS S S LS LS LS
ResiduesHardener Packaging
LS LS S S LS LS LS
Air emissions VOC LS LS S S LS LS LS
Environmental intensity and significance Parameterization
Environmental Performance Assessment
ecoPROSYS methodology description
Page 10
Eco-Efficiency Profile
ProcessMapping • Environmental Performance Assessment (EPA)
• Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)
• Value Modelling
ecoPROSYS Pillars:
ecoPROSYS methodology description
Page 11
Free available databases
• ELCD• APME - Industry data 2.0• LCA Food DK• US LCI• GREET• ALCAS• SPINE@CPM• IISI• GTGLCI• GEMIS• …
ToolDatabase
Input Categories
Impact 2002+
ImpactCategories
DamageCategories
Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)
ecoPROSYS methodology description
Page 12
Characterisation
ToolDatabase
Output
Input Categories
Impact 2002+
LCA Results
EnvironmentalInfluence
Impact 2002+
Input by user
ImpactCategories
DamageCategories
Calculation
Type of material
Type of energy
Type of resource
Type of residue
Type of emission
Amount
Amount
Amount
Amount
Amount
ProcessMapping
ecoPROSYS methodology description
Page 13
Eco-Efficiency Profile
ProcessMapping • Environmental Performance Assessment (EPA)
• Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)
• Value Modelling
ecoPROSYS Pillars:
ecoPROSYS methodology description
Page 14
Materials
Energy
Resources
Residues
Equipment
Labour
Standard accounting
systemindicators
Financial investmentsSalesOperating subsidiesSupplies and external servicesLabour costs…
GAV
EBITDA
Gross productionvalue
…
Value Modelling
ecoPROSYS methodology description
Page 15
Eco-Efficiency Profile
Significantenvironmental
aspects
Life cycleassessment
Valuemodelling
Environmentalperformance assessment
ProcessMapping
Environmentalinfluence
(KEPIs)
Valueindicators
Eco-Efficiency Profile
ecoPROSYS methodology description
Page 16
ecoPROSYS ProfilesEnvironmental Profile
Indicator Value
Materials and Raw Materials 780 kg
Total Energy 10.000 kWh
Water consumption 2,27E-02 m3
Residues (total) 29 kg
GHG Emissions 6580 kg CO2 eq.
Acidification 65 kg SO2 eq.
Electricity 0,49 Pts
Materials and Raw Materials 0,71 Pts
Residues incineration 0,0021 Pts
Environmental Influence (Total) 2,41 Pts
Value Profile
Indicator Valor
EBITDA 150,00 €
GAV 400,00 €
Sales 500,00 €
Production time 475 hours
Product Durability 40 years
Eco-eficiency Profile
Eco-eficiency Principle Environmentl AspectRatio: GAV
IA
P1 - Reduce material intensity Materials Paint 740,59
P2 - Reduce energy intensity Energy Diesel 313,79
P2 - Reduce energy intensity Energy Electricity 805,60
P3 - Reduce dispersion of toxic substances Air emissions VOCs 33256,84
Eco-efficiency (Total) 165,98
ecoPROSYS methodology description
Page 17
Eco-Efficiency Profile
Significantenvironmental
aspects
Life cycleassessment
Valuemodelling
Environmentalperformance assessment
ProcessMapping
Environmentalinfluence
(KEPIs)
Valueindicators
Eco-Efficiency profile
Goals
ecoPROSYS methodology description
Page 18
Nº Eco-efficiency Principles Goal
P1 Reduce material intensity 0%
P2 Reduce energy intensity 10%
P3 Reduce dispersion of toxic substances 0%
P4 Enhance recyclability 0%
P5 Maximize use of renewable resources 0%
P6 Extend product durability 0%
P7 Increase service intensity 0%
Energy – Current Scenario
Type of Energy Quantity (kWh/year) Cost (€/year)
Electricity 2500 200
Diesel 7500 900
Energy – Alternative Scenario
Type of Energy Quantity (kWh/year) Cost (€/year)
Electricity 2250 180
Diesel 6750 810
Indicator Current scenario Alternative scenario
Energy consumption 10.000 kWh 9.000 kWh
Energy cost 1.100 € 990 €
GHG Emission 6580 kg CO2 eq. 5800 kg CO2 eq.
Acidification 65 kg SO2 eq. 58,62 kg SO2 eq.
Electricity 0,49 Pts 0,441 Pts
Environmental Influence (total) 2,41 Pts 2,35 Pts
Eco-efficiency Ratio: VABIA
165,98 170,21
ecoPROSYS methodology description
Page 19
Eco-Efficiency Profile
Significantenvironmental
aspects
Life cycleassessment
Valuemodelling
Environmentalperformance assessment
ProcessMapping
Environmentalinfluence
(KEPIs)
Valueindicators
Eco-Efficiency profile
Goals
Continuous Improvement
ecoPROSYS methodology description
Page 20
Eco-Efficiency Profile
Significantenvironmental
aspects
Life cycleassessment
Valuemodelling
Environmentalperformance assessment
ProcessMapping
Environmentalinfluence
(KEPIs)
Valueindicators
Eco-Efficiency profile
Goals
Simulation of alternatives and sensitivity analysis
Material andEnergy Flow
Analysis
LCC approach
ecoPROSYS methodology description
Page 21
Eco-
efficiency
Life Cycle Impact
Assessment
Scope & Data
Collection
Cost & Value
Assessment
Environmental
Performance Evaluation
KEPIEco-efficiency
Indicators
Cost & Value
Data
Environmental
Profile
Eco-efficiency
ProfileValue Profile
Co
nti
nu
ou
s Im
pro
vem
en
t
Indicators
Profile
Page 22
Case study description and results
Plywood boards finishing line description
Unit Process (Stages) Description
Feeding table Supply the conveyer with boards (automatically)
CalibratingConsist in calibrating the board's thickness using coarse and medium
sand paper
SandingConsist in sanding the MDF boards to obtain a smooth finish and
guarantee the specification thickness
Cutting
The cutting process consists of two steps, vertical cutting and
longitudinal cutting, during these steps the MDF boards are also
calibrated in terms of width and length
StackingDuring this unit process the MDF boards, already cut, are stacked, and
the protection board is placed on the top
PackingThis unit process is carried out by placing cardboard and the base
studs, finally the strapping PET tape placed
Page 23
Case study description and results
Plywood boards finishing line description
Description Amount (per m3) Unit
Materials MDF supplied into the finishing line 900.620 kg
Auxiliary Materials
Sandpaper 0.288 m2
Cardboard package 0.649 kg
Protective MDF board 32.420 kg
Stud (base protection) 8.230 kg
PVC strapping tape 0.240 kg
EnergyDiesel (fork lift) 0.252 kg
Electric 43.715 kWh
Water Cooling water 100 Litres
Air Emissions CO2 emissions (forklift) 0.670 kg
Wastewater Cooling water 100 Litres
ResiduesWood trimmings and dust 150.620 kg
Sand paper 0.2881 m2
Page 24
Case study description and results
Plywood boards finishing line: Results
Environmental influence of material and energy (Single score)
Environmental influence of each unit process per damage category (Single score)
Page 25
Case study description and results
Plywood boards finishing line: Results
Eco-efficiency profile - Unit processes
Unit processes (2) Normalized Impacts (Pt)
Normalized costs (€)
Eco-efficiency indicators
Feeding table 0.03 0.02 6.51E-01
Calibrating 0.70 0.22 3.20E-01
Sanding 0.91 0.28 3.04E-01
Cutting 0.02 0.06 3.26E+00
Stacking 1.00 0.03 2.87E-02
Packing 0.48 1.00 2.11E+00
Overall eco-efficiency indicator(3) 2,05E+03
(2) - Unit Process Production Cost/Unit Process Environmental influence
(3) - GVA/Environmental influence
Page 26
Case study description and results
Plywood boards finishing line: Results
Environmental Profile
Energy and materials - Environmental Influence
Material consumed 6.53E-03 Pt
Electrical energy consumed 8.26E-03 Pt
Diesel consumed 1.85E-04 Pt
Water used 8.53E-05 Pt
Global warming 4.07E+01 kg CO2 eq
Aquatic acidification 2.85E-01 kg SO2 eq
Ozone layer depletion 2.75E-06 kg CFC-11 eq
EBITDA 14.80 €/m3
GVA 30.82 €/m3
Sales 237.80 €/m3
Production cost 12.15 €/m3
Value profile
Page 27
Case study description and results
Plywood boards finishing line: Results
Eco-efficiency plot for MDF finishing line production system (bubble area is proportional to environmental impact - Pt)
Page 28
Conclusions and remarks
ecoPROSYS© is a flexible standard-based methodology to assess the eco-efficiency performance of production systems
Integrates Environmental Performance Evaluation (EPA) with EnvironmentalImpact and Cost/Value assessment models through a life cycle prespective(LCA and LCC)
Generates a comprehensive set of simple and intuitive indicators (KPI andKEPI), and multiple eco-efficiency ratios
Allows the simulation of alternatives and sensitivity analysis aiming thesupport of decision making process for continuous improvement
It is structured in TWO complexity levels (ecoPROSYS Level 1 and Level 2) tobetter adjust the eco-efficiency assessment regarding the MATURITY LEVELof the company
Generates profiles of eco-efficiency assessment: Environmental Profile,Value Profile, Eco-Efficiency Profile) for inner and external comunication
Page 29
Conclusions and remarks
ecoPROSYS© methodology was imbibed into Software Tools byMicroProcessador and SISTRADE ICT companies in the two levels ofcomplexity (ecoPROSYS Level 1 – “Base analysis” and Level 2 – “Advancedanalysis”)
There are strong foundations within the methodology for ContinuousImprovement attitude and eco-efficiency improvement of companiesprocesses
ecoPROSYS© is being used in several ongoing projects as a basis for eco-efficiency assessment, both at a Portuguese National level, but also atEuropean International level, namely with project SPIRE - H2020 MAESTRI
Total Resource and Energy Efficiency
Management System for Process Industries
Page 30
Thank you for your attention
ecoPROSYS: An eco-efficiency framework applied to a medium density fiberboard finishing line
António J Baptista ([email protected])