Lazy Dog’s Can · Lazy Dog’s Can EF 152 Spring, 2017 March 4th, 2017 Team 15 Spencer Mapes,...
Transcript of Lazy Dog’s Can · Lazy Dog’s Can EF 152 Spring, 2017 March 4th, 2017 Team 15 Spencer Mapes,...
Lazy Dog’s Can
EF 152 Spring, 2017
March 4th, 2017
Team 15
Spencer Mapes, Trent Payne, Abby Newberry, Ellie Jelinek
Marketing Video
Customer Requirements/Product SelectionuTargetAudience
u 2-6yearoldsuRequirements
u Tocreateatoythatisentertaining,informative,andnotdangerous.
uWhy?u AstheSTEMcareershaveanincreasingdemand,childrenhaveaneedtolearnaboutenergyearlierintheirlives.
uHow?uWethoughtabouthowtoreverseawinduptoy.
ConceptualDesignu Why?
uTeachChildrenaboutPotentialvs.KineticEnergy.
uMaterialsu3DPrintCasinguSpringuWeight
Actual DesignuWhy?
u 3DcasingwasnotanoptionuRubberbandwasmoreversatile.
uHow?uCanister(approximatelysamesizeascaddesign).
u Suspendedweightsfromarubberband.
u Stabilizedrubberbandfromeithersideofcanister.
Customer Feedback
u Parent Feedbacku The younger the child the more enjoyable it is. This is
because they are easily distracted and would find something to play with before they went to get it.
u This toy creates less stress for a parent because they are not worried about the cleaning since it is low maintenance.
u Children Feedbacku The tend to enjoy it because the toy comes back to
them and they never had to chase it. You could see the children really provoked on the mechanics of the Lazy Dog’s Can
Customer has four children:10 year old girl8 year old girl4 year old boy3 year old boy
Cost Estimates
Item CostPerItem QuantityofItem
TotalCost
Rubberbands $0.045(2)=$0.09
2000 $90.00
Weight $1.00 1000 $1,000.00
Casing $2.50 1000 $2,500.00
TotalPerUnit $3.59 1000Units $3590.00
Time Estimates
Time (mins)
Devising 185
Developing 195
Report
ØA total of 380 mins were spent on devising and developing our toy, this does not include time for the presentation
ØRetail price will be set at $10.00 to create a large profit margin to offset the initial $3.59 and man hours.
Brief Summary/ Conclusion
uSummaryu Althoughwehadtechnicalerrors,wewereabletoproduceasuccessfulprototypethatreachesover30feetinlength!
uConclusionu Ifgiventhepropertimeandmaterial,wewouldhavefoundawaytobetterproduceamorereliablecanister.
u Thisprototypehasthepotentialtoinspiretoycompaniestobuildtoycarswithaaxelmechanism.