layout and sld.pptx

download layout and sld.pptx

of 30

Transcript of layout and sld.pptx

  • 7/28/2019 layout and sld.pptx

    1/30

    Single Line &Layout of

    HV Substation

    M. M. Meraat

    Spring 1392

  • 7/28/2019 layout and sld.pptx

    2/30

    Table of content

    Busbar arrangement(scheme) selectionBasic Insulation Level

    Equipment arrangement

  • 7/28/2019 layout and sld.pptx

    3/30

    Busbar arrangement(scheme) selection

    Type of busbar arrangement:

    Simple/single busbar scheme

    Single sectionalized busbar scheme

    Single Sectionalized busbar with U configuration

    scheme

    Main and transfer busbar scheme

    Double busbar scheme(with one CB)

    Double busbar scheme(with two CB)

    Ring bus scheme

    Double busbar with bypass disconnector scheme

    One and half circuit breaker (conventional)scheme

    One and half circuit breaker (Inverted) scheme

  • 7/28/2019 layout and sld.pptx

    4/30

    Simple/single busbar scheme Advantage:

    One CB for each feeder Simple protection scheme Low space Cost of a single bus arrangement is

    relatively low,

    Line connections to a single busarrangement are normally straight forward,

    since all lines are connected to the same main bus.

    Therefore, lines can be connected on themain bus in areas

    closest to the direction of the departingline, thus mitigating lines crossing outsidethe substation.

    Disadvantage: for a bus outage the entire facility must be

    de-energized. There is no alternative way for feeding a

    feeder after CB outage Low reliability For any extension , all feeder shall be turn

    off

    Conclusion: Its suitable for small S/S with less important load

  • 7/28/2019 layout and sld.pptx

    5/30

    Single sectionalized busbar scheme Bus section is normally closed

    Advantage: If a fault happen in each section

    just this section will be disconnect More reliability related to single

    busbar For extension its not necessary that

    all of the feeder go out

    Simple protection scheme Low space

    Disadvantage: Any fault at busbar or any problem

    for each CB will be lead to fulloutage of its section

    There is no alternative way forfeeding a feeder after CB outage For any extension , all feeders of

    each section shall be turn off

    Conclusion: Its very common in 63 kV substation

  • 7/28/2019 layout and sld.pptx

    6/30

    Single Sectionalized busbar with U configuration

    scheme

    The length of substation will be limited (related toprevious) but its width will be more than previous

    scheme

    Each feeder (Incoming or outgoing) without relation

    to its location can be connected to bus section oneor two

  • 7/28/2019 layout and sld.pptx

    7/30

    Main and Transfer Bus System One main busbar In normal operation all feeders will be connected to main busbar

    The transfer busbar will be disconnected (off) In maintenance or supervisory of each CB, the related feeder can be fed

    through the coupler and disconnector This scheme is appropriate for feeder with less importance which short

    outage wont make any disturb The cost of the main and transfer bus arrangement is more than the single

    bus arrangement because of the added transfer bus and switchingdevices. In addition, if a low-profile configuration is used, landrequirements are substantially more.

    Application of this type of configuration should be limited to low reliabilityrequirement situations.

  • 7/28/2019 layout and sld.pptx

    8/30

    Double busbar scheme(with one CB)

    Two busbar

    Feeders can be connected to busbar one or two With fault in each feeder , this feeder will be disconnected just for a few

    moment and will be connected again through the coupler

    For a fault in each busbar all of the feeder can be moved to second one.

    More reliability but more apace and more cost

    It can be implemented back to back either ( for different design)

    Relay protection for this arrangement will be complex with the flexibility of

    transferring each circuit to either bus. Operating procedures would need to bedetailed to allow for various operating arrangements, with checks to ensure thein-service arrangements are correct. A bus tie breaker failure will cause anoutage of the entire station.

  • 7/28/2019 layout and sld.pptx

    9/30

    Double busbar scheme(with two CB)

    With two breakers and two buses per circuit, a single bus failure

    can be isolated without interrupting any circuits or loads.Furthermore, a circuit failure of one circuit will not interrupt othercircuits or buses. Therefore, reliability of this arrangement isextremely high.

    Maintenance of switching devices in this arrangement is very easy,since switching devices can be taken out-of-service as needed

    and circuits can continue to operate with partial line relayprotection and some line switching devices in-service, i.e., one ofthe two circuit breakers.

    Obviously, with double the amount of switching devices andbuses, cost will be substantially increased relative to other moresimple bus configurations. In addition, relaying is morecomplicated and more land is required, especially for low-profilesubstation configurations.

    External line connections to a double breakerdouble bussubstation normally do not cause conflicts with each other, butmay require substantial land area adjacent to the facility as thistype of station expands.

  • 7/28/2019 layout and sld.pptx

    10/30

    Double busbar scheme(with two CB)

    This arrangement allows for operational flexibility; certain lines

    could be fed from one bus section by switching existing devices.

  • 7/28/2019 layout and sld.pptx

    11/30

    Ring bus scheme this arrangement affords increased reliability to

    the circuits, since with properly operating relayprotection, a fault on one bus section will onlyinterrupt the circuit on that bus section and a

    fault on a circuit will not affect any other device. Protective relaying for a ring bus will involve

    more complicated design and, potentially, morerelays to protect a single circuit.

    Keep in mind that bus and switching devices in aring bus must all have the same ampacity, sincecurrent flow will change depending on theswitching devices operating position.

    From a maintenance point of view, the ring busprovides good flexibility. A breaker can bemaintained without transferring or droppingload, since one of the two breakers can remainin-service and provide line protection while theother is being maintained.

    The ring bus arrangement is applicable to loads

    where reliability and availability of the circuit is ahigh priority.

    Disadvantage:a stuck breaker event couldcause an outage of the entire substationdepending on the number of breakers in thering, (b) expansion of the ring bus configurationcan be limited due to the number of circuits thatare physically feasible in this arrangement

  • 7/28/2019 layout and sld.pptx

    12/30

    Double busbar with bypass disconnector scheme

  • 7/28/2019 layout and sld.pptx

    13/30

    One and half circuit breaker (conventional)scheme In many cases, this is the next development stage of

    a ring bus arrangement. Similar to the ring bus, this configuration provides

    good reliability; with proper operating relayprotection,

    a single circuit failure will not interrupt any othercircuits.

    Furthermore, a bus section fault, unlike the ring bus,will not interrupt any circuit loads.

    Maintenance as well is facilitated by thisarrangement, since an entire bus and adjacent

    breakers can be maintained without transferring ordropping loads.

    Relay protection is similar to the ring bus, and due tothe additional devices, is more complex and costlythan most of the previously reviewed arrangements.

    The breaker-and-a-half arrangement can beexpanded as needed.

    Cost of this configuration is commensurate with the

    number of circuits, but based on the good reliability,operating flexibility, and ease of maintenance,

    the price can be justified. Obviously, the area required for this type of

    arrangement is significant, and the higher the voltage, the more

    clearances required and area needed.

  • 7/28/2019 layout and sld.pptx

    14/30

    One and half circuit breaker (inverted)scheme

  • 7/28/2019 layout and sld.pptx

    15/30

    Basic Insulation Level

    The statistical BSL is the crest value of a standardswitching/Lightning impulse for which the insulationexhibits a 90% probability of withstand, a 10%probability of failure.

    The conventional BSL is the crest value of astandard switching impulse forwhich the insulationdoes not exhibit disruptive discharge whensubjected to a specific number of applications ofthis impulse.

  • 7/28/2019 layout and sld.pptx

    16/30

    Basic Insulation Level For 245kV and Below

  • 7/28/2019 layout and sld.pptx

    17/30

    Basic Insulation Level For 300kV and above

  • 7/28/2019 layout and sld.pptx

    18/30

    Electrical clearances

  • 7/28/2019 layout and sld.pptx

    19/30

    Electrical clearances

  • 7/28/2019 layout and sld.pptx

    20/30

    H Scheme

  • 7/28/2019 layout and sld.pptx

    21/30

  • 7/28/2019 layout and sld.pptx

    22/30

    Double busbar

  • 7/28/2019 layout and sld.pptx

    23/30

    Double busbar

  • 7/28/2019 layout and sld.pptx

    24/30

    Double busbar

  • 7/28/2019 layout and sld.pptx

    25/30

    Double busbar

  • 7/28/2019 layout and sld.pptx

    26/30

    Double busbar with bypass DS

  • 7/28/2019 layout and sld.pptx

    27/30

    Double busbar with bypass DS

  • 7/28/2019 layout and sld.pptx

    28/30

    One and half CB(Conventional)

  • 7/28/2019 layout and sld.pptx

    29/30

    One and half CB( Inverted )

  • 7/28/2019 layout and sld.pptx

    30/30

    Special design