Lawyer File #9

7/28/2019 Lawyer File #9

1/22

1

To: York RegionYork Regional Police

Bruce HerridgeDeputy Chief

Fax: 905-853-5810

From: Frank Gallagher34 Riverglen DriveKeswick, On.L4P 2P8

[email protected]

Part 1, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom

52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that isinconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no

force or effect.

31. Nothing in this Charter extends the legislative powers of any body or authority.

32. (1) This Charter applies (a) to the Parliament and government of Canada in respect of allmatters within the authority of Parliament including all matters relating to the Yukon Territoryand Northwest Territories; and (b) to the legislature and government of each province inrespect of all matters within the authority of the legislature of each province.

15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of the

law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour,

religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.

Re: Constitution Act, 1982

Non Compliance

Ref # 11063-05

Dear Bruce Herridge

On January 10 2006 you wrote to inform me that you would not commence proceedings against Don Wilson(See pages 19 & 20) who had committed 2 acts of fraud under the criminal code in the Ontario Rental HousingTribunal building at 375 Darcy Street, Newmarket, Ontario on June 30 2005 (See page 18)

I have attempted several times to get your office to demonstrate competence to enforce law and order in a

manner consistent with the Constitution Act, 1982 which guarantees certain rights and protection equally toevery individual of Canada under the Charter but you declined to do so.

On September 5 2006 I sent you a copy of the BLACK BOOK file which you forwarded to Detective Moreau# 710 and eventually found its way to Inspector Karen Knoakes, #440, Executive Officer of the York RegionalPolice Professional Standards Bureau who declined to act. (See pages 21 & 22)

I am no writer and I dont do a whole lot of reading for pleasure but one thing I feel is very important when I

do read, is to keep it real and understand what its all about. I find if you go about it in a manner to provesomething you have already decided you will have difficulty putting it in words to make sense.

March 30 2007

LAWYER FILE # 9

CANADA IS FOUNDED ON PRINCIPLES THAT RECOGNIZES THE

SUPREMACY OF GOD AND THE RULE OF LAW

THIS IS NOT A PERSONAL MATTER


2/22

2

Perhaps, the best thing I can advise to you people is before you put words to paper is to have a good idea aboutwhat you are talking about.

This is a very important job you people are doing and it requires you to give it the respect it deserves.

The people trust you and unfortunately that is a huge problem.

People who come to you have no idea about how law works and that is no surprise because they have careers

in other walks of life.If you went to them for services such as a plumber, carpenter, electrician or whatever they could write abouttheir job or just go ahead and do it which is the preferred choice of their clients and themselves for both wantthe job done soon as possible so they can move on.

When the job is done you see it and feel it and it is satisfying.Its all just common sense and things go smoothly.

When it comes to law where common sense would seem to be the way to go it hasnt worked that way. Some of the officers I have talked to have expressed their frustration as you have mentioned in your writingsand from what I understand is they have been frustrated for a long time experienced enough to purportedly

know what is considered to meet the criterion of evidence required to prove beyond a reasonable doubt.

I was informed you can take the same evidence to two different judges to apply for a warrant and 1 will grantand the other deny.You didnt try with my evidence.

Perhaps one of the keys here is the consistent frustration and I ask if it is frustrating then one must believe theevidence is sound but I am informed that officers learn early in their careers that law has nothing to do withcommon sense, in fact this is passed on to new recruits.

So this has to be a very frustrating career if you attempt to hang on to your sanity and when you find othersgetting ahead and yourself not I imagine it is very trying times until you let go.

So you people in law who have the experience of working together smoothly in an insane manner comprehendeach other quite well and confidently confirm each others idiocy when the public question you.

The general public has difficulty, being ignorant and all about the law as you people are of plumbing orelectricity so they accept what you have to say especially if others reiterate your statements.

Those who have had run in with the law relate their stories and try to top each other as to who has the bestridiculous story about the law.

But they all get over them and move on because they have different careers and dont have time to look into itand after all it takes some time to get educated in law considering you need lawyers in criminal courts.

So lawyers cost money to those people who have property and nothing to those who dont and irrelevant tothose who are well off.

This gives a huge advantage to those on either side of the average person who is struggling to pay off theirmortgage and save for their kids education and all the realities of life.

So right there we have a pathetic inconsistency with the Charter.


3/22

3

15. (1) Every individual is equal before and under the law and has the right to the equal protection andequal benefit of the law without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based onrace, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.

So like in my particular case Fred Kerr suggested after telling me one judge may warrant and anothernot and standing firm that my only recourse is to get a lawyer and go to civil court, but the lawyer wouldbe negligent if he didnt mention that the odds of getting my money back were slim. I know these things

So, here we are after the ORHT never followed through with charges against Don Wilson who had

committed the criminal act of fraud in their building in front of the judicator, Nancy Fahlgren who knewfull well that Don had committed the crime and after I had said There ought to be a law she respondedThere is and went on to articulate for a couple of minutes on how she has the authority, when caseswarrant to forward them onto Investigations and Enforcement.

She would not answer directly as to whether she would proceed.

At the end of the hearing of the first day June 30 2005 I asked her what the thing was beside her andstarted to say is that a and she said yes it is a recorder and I asked if I could get a copy of therecording after the hearing was done and said yes through the ORHT office.

The second day of the hearing, July 28 2005 she commenced by stating there was no recorder that day.

When I received the Tribunal order dated August 8 2005 she found for me which meant that she hadfound the evidence I provided to be true and the dispute Don Wilson filed false.

And why not because it was the craziest wildest story and he even provided a story to account for why hedidnt have any evidence to support it.Don had signed the two agreements I had to support the truth and contradict his lies on his dispute, with asignature other than the one he has used on all other documents including the dispute he filed.

I introduced Dave Kirby to Nancy Fahlgren, the fellow who witnessed one of the agreements who attested tothe fact that Don had signed every page of the April 13 2005 agreement.

Nancy expressed that she now sees whats going on and one by one I provide the evidence to prove everystatement on Dons dispute which he had filed to be a lie and everything in the agreements to be true.

It just doesnt get better than that in legal matters and the Tribunal Order file TNL-67103 which I receivedAugust 10 2005 found for me.

So far everything was coincidental to common sense.

The Order didnt mention anything about charging Don and I have no idea if it would if Nancy was charginghim so I made a few phone calls to find that I could not communicate with the judicator, and you can read therest in Lawyer File # 1.

On August 10 2005 I phoned for a copy of the Tribunal recording and wrote the Investigations andEnforcement Unit to have them file charges against Don Wilson.This was quite a challenge and much correspondence but finally on September 6 2005 Dave Grech writes meto explain why his Unit would not be commencing proceedings against Don Wilson.

His writings were as strange to me as Don Wilsons dispute, not coincidental with reality and the pertinentfacts.


4/22

4

I wont go through all this again because it is covered in the evidence which I am providing in this round.

I then decided to take the matter to the York Regional Police and after meeting with F. Kerr and G. RorkeI provided the evidence to the RCMP, Mr.Goulet at the Harry Walker Parkway Office south of Davis Drivewho forwarded it onto Michael Thomson who deals with such matters.

I continued to correspond with the York Regional Police which led to a meeting with Michael FlemingInspector, I believe off hand, and he confirmed that which F.Kerr and G.Rorke had stated.

He knew the frustration and stated he knew he was a con artist but alas this is how it is.He explained to me how they are taught that the law has nothing to do with common sense and we left it at thawith me agreeing.

I had asked if there was a complaints department to deal with matters under the Corporations Act and he saidhe would look into it.He e-mailed later that day and provided me information from the Act which I had already downloaded fromthe web site but it required me to get a lawyer which I had already decided was not a feasible way to go andwhy should I when Don had committed obvious crimes right there in a building financed by the people toadminister justice.

As F. Kerr stated if I went to a lawyer he would be negligent if he didnt inform me of the odds of getting mymoney back and I would just be throwing good money after bad.

When the RCMP responded negatively I had it quite clear in my mind that common sense had nothing to dowith the law and the YRP and RCMP have adapted to insanity and were well experienced where us plainsimple folk are at a disadvantage having no experience communicating in the legal environment whereinsanity must be common to harmonize.

Our only means of communicating in this environment is to retain an interpreter to act on our behalf butultimately the decision is up to us.

It gets quite confusing and in relatively small matters, say $1000 dollars it may be just too much trouble topursue and the matter is dropped.

These agreements firmed up the phony Certificates which he had provided when I and friends of mine investedwith Bio Safe. A lawyer had told me these were evidence that we paid money for stock but as official as theylooked they were not the proper certificates and they were not signed.

The agreements cleared up this matter and others which not only supported my and my friends investmentsbut covered those who had invested before us. Very important documents at face value over $100,000 and Dondenied having ever seen them or signed them but had signed them with a phony signature for obvious purposeof deception commonly known as FRAUD in the common sense world.

Anyway with all the realities of life to ponder to make a decision and with a copy of the Constitution Act,1982 I decided to stick with common sense, the one the people are most familiar with, and considering thereare substantially more just plain folk so to speak relative to the million government employees I decidedto hang on to reality with a common sense approach. The same common sense I used for my 40 years in mylegal survey career. We have lots of laws, rules and regulations, statutes and evidence, Acts, By-Laws and allkinds of stuff like that. We used them for a definite purpose to provide society with a service which wasunbiased to ensure all people of society got exactly what property they were entitled to by their purchase.Our records were legal documents which must be held in perpetuity for all to see and be challenged at any timeby other surveyors who were required to abide by the pertinent laws. Evidence is what it is all about.


5/22

5

Evidence includes documentation and physical evidence on the ground called for in the documents and whenabutting deeds describe the adjoining property lines differently we must base our decisions upon Laws andActs and all kinds of things where facts trump beliefs and always with the purpose to reestablish things exactlyhow they were according to the original survey which separated it from the whole township lot.Priorities, priorities always priorities is the name of the game and when two properties abut each other and thedescriptions do not place the property line between them in the same place after a thorough search for originalphysical evidence and original documentary evidence fails to solve the matter priority is given to the deedwhich was first registered to separate from the township lot for the very simple reason it was already sold tosomeone else and the owner of the original lot can not sell any part of that which he had originally sold to

someone else.

It all fits with logic and common sense. It has served me well, and especially well when I was employed withthe Province of Ontario for 10 years and the City of Toronto for 14 where common sense is not common.

It has to do with cash for life and experience defined as how many years they have put in idly counting theirnumber of days to retirement.

Anyway the Laws and Acts and all the stuff we use in the private sector still all mean the same thing even ingovernment so I learned quickly the value of staying with the law and facts instead of arguing with those whohave faith in that which was passed on to them generation after generation.

You would be surprised how much fun the job is doing it the way it was intended according to law and theway all the property lines can be reestablished in their original places coincidental to documents when youapply your self to the task with common sense.

Of course to use the common sense approach you have to know what the hell you are talking about.

It boils down to this. When someone of authority orders me to do something contrary to law I simply write inmy report that I was instructed to do so by so and so and have them sign it before I sign it.

Thats what makes the difference. They have always refused to sign showing the power of law has more

authority over even the most perfect jackass.

These idiots think they can use their authority to do as they like and when the shit hits the fan they blame it onthe fellow who did the job and signed it.

I found if you are going to take the shit it is a damn good idea to know what you are talking about and makesure there is no evidence available for others to rebut your decisions. Never did catch any shit.

Kind of closes the door on the ignorant asses and I like it that way.Surely that is how it should be especially when my purpose is to see that everyone gets what they are entitledto.

It just doesnt get better than that, but alas there remains the problem that there exists so many with unjustifiedauthority and so many who worship assholes that the people of the world suffer to them.

When these idiots put laws in place in a democracy where the people are supposed to benefit and the lawsthemselves prove otherwise what would you expect from the courts which the Attorney General has significaninfluence over and in fact has significant influence over the laws themselves.

These laws by the way have no authority legally unless they are consistent with the spirit of the Constitution.


6/22

6

PRIORITIES

Those people who are employed in the public services are there under the authority of the Constitution Act,1982 (THE LAW) and they all are obliged to comply with the THE LAW as well as everyone in Canada.

COMMON SENSE must prevail for it is what we use to learn everything about life.

By common sense we know that if rules are not set out in society the thoughtless immoral will take advantage

of the moral.

Only when we address the facts reality provides, with integrity and common sense will we be able to have areality of choice.

It is so important to be attentive to reality when you attempt to put thoughts to paper and with computers wehave a huge advantage because as our original thoughts go down and laid out we can find some thoughtswhich appear to contradict earlier words written and we have the opportunity to ponder these and edit them toexpress exactly that which we are trying to convey.

Leaves room for argument if you appear to be arguing with yourself in your own writings so you must take the

time to argue these out with yourself. Does wonders for your own common sense when you have nothing toargue about with yourself.

In matters of the Constitution of Canada

The IDEAL of course is to have everyone in Canada to have sense together in common for sense to prevail.

In matters of THE LAW we must presume COMMON SENSE to prevail and that is priority number one or therest is meaningless.

With COMMON SENSE we can determine that COMMON SENSE is not consistent within society and the

fact The Constitution was enacted supports that, so as to set out the spirit of the society it aspires to achieve.

Purpose: Everything must have purpose

Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law:

That makes it perfectly clear. Moral purpose and the rule of law to enforce it. Works for me.

Exudes COMMON SENSE

Immorality can exist without THE LAW and one hell of a lot cheaper.

Given that MORAL COMMON SENSE is prerequisite in matters of THE LAW and the provisions of theCHARTER which guarantees equality in all matters of THE LAW we can simplify all the words into onestatement.

DO ONTO OTHERS AS YOU WOULD HAVE THEM DO ONTO YOU

Thats it, thats all there is to it, except I should emphasize that this in no way infers special rights to masochists


7/22

7

Obviously if we are to have a moral peaceful society we can not have immorality tugging in the oppositedirection. Morality is the only possible solution to a peaceful society.If society voted for immorality to be the society of choice we would forever be beating our selves up.

So priority is to morality, COMMON SENSE and consistency

There is not one person who can say that COMMON SENSE is not mandatory in matters of THE LAW

BUT, BUT..To hell with BUTs.There is no argument that will trump the spirit of THE LAW

MORAL COMMON SENSEand there is no rule that will trump


Every one of us has the same bodies that require the same necessities to sustain them, we all have emotions andsenses and we all are prone to error

We understand the difference between intentional and accidental harm and carelessness predictable to causing harm

As we know from reality laws do not do anything by themselves although the moral people with common sense knowthem before they are written, so if we are to have a MORAL COMMON SENSE society as THE LAW demands we musthave MORAL ENFORCEMENT

MORAL ENFORCEMENT OF A MORAL COMMON SENSE SOCIETY

Every last one of us who have any sense at all will agree that to be true or reveal their incompetence or ulteriorpurpose which of course is not consistent to the ideology.

Everyone with moral common sense knows what is not conducive to moral common sense.

Thats right, immoral common sense and everyone knows how to identify the immoral even if they stand alone.

They are the ones spewing words which dont make sense to the moral and do make sense to the immoral

It is all very simple mathematics and when things dont add up you must check the facts.

You must have an unbiased competent mind to check the facts for when you look for evidence to support a liewhen lies are all around you, you will support it to the fact you are a liar or ignorant your choice but neitherconducive to MORAL ENFORCEMENT OF A MORAL COMMON SENSE SOCIETY.

We know from reality that everyone will attest they are moral and competent as they slip their hands into our pocketsWe know if we let them they will and we know it is better to stop them before they do.

Its all there, the priorities of a moral society as per the spirit of the Constitution

MORAL ENFORCEMENT OF A MORAL COMMON SENSE SOCIETY

DO ONTO OTHERE AS YOU WOULD HAVE THEM DO ONTO YOU


8/22

8

There you have it, the plain truth and it is all just as simple as that yet with everything going for moral,common sense, THE LAW which makes sense, the supremacy of God whose ways make sense, we have hell onearth instead ofHeaven On Earth

If I were to say lets change it to the way it is supposed to be, desired by everyone there will be people who say Iam an IDEALIST not dealing with reality.

I will say I am a REALIST knowing you must deal with reality to change it to the IDEAL

As a realist and having 24 years experience in government employ and 16 in the private sector in the same fieldof endeavor namely surveying and quite competent in matters of law and you can verify that by asking me, Iadamantly state I know the way and it only requires people to use Moral Common Sense

I am not a magician nor brilliant but I do see reality as it is and I know where the problems lie and I know howto deal with reality and I do know how to deal with immorality.

Unfortunately, I have the authority to deal with it alone but not the financial ability and those who have thepower and the money of the people do not have the authority to do what they do.

I have proven from top to bottom precisely where the problem lies and it can be dealt legally within a democracy

yet it is because of where the problem lies that we have our biggest detriment to a moral society.

The cops unfortunately are of weak mind and the lawmakers are of weak morality that use the powers granted tothem in trust by the people for their own ulterior purpose.

Every investigative authority I have corresponded with have proven their incompetence to investigate and it iswell documented for anyone to see but those with the power to do something are the only people who have seenthe documents and are so well organized in consistent immoral common sense which makes it somewhatdifficult to access my right to freedom of the press which by their actions prove which side they are on.

Once you know what you are dealing with it is much simpler to find a way to deal with it.

All these fine words of wisdom wasted on me who already know them. Such a shame

If perhaps the police would search their minds and decide just what it is they are there for maybe we peoplewould have a chance.

If they are immoral and know it then of course that makes my chance to help the people a little bit harder so itsbest to determine for certain by me giving all I got to that endeavor and see what becomes of that.

Its all good for the purpose because facts and truth serve best which ever be the final route to success.

So for the people, if you care for the people, which will be determined by your actions, I ask you to throw awayall that you believe to be law and instill in your minds the purpose of the supreme law of Canada and deal withthe matters referenced in these writings.

Lawyer Files #s 1-8 and this file # 9 and the 73 page letter to the Toronto Sun dated October 8 2006


9/22

9

Lawyer File # 9 Page 9 Reality Check

MORAL COMMON SENSE SOCIETYINTEGRITY IS A MUST

Review your training about law having nothing to do with common sense Review the correspondence from all sources and see what they have to do with common sense

Do you know the source of this ideology and would they admit it in public?

Why are you a cop?

To enforce law, any law sane or not, just give me a law I can enforce and exert my power.

To enforce law, a sane law for the benefit of society.

Do you enforce it to the best of your ability?

Do you just put in a day to collect a pay check?

Reality makes such answers difficult to admit to anyone.You must be honest with yourself to benefit yourself

Reality is always there to attest to all truthsIn Reality we have liars

Liars have no good reason to lie

Reality attests to why one lies

MORAL HAVE COMMON SENSE

IMMORAL HAVE COMMON CENTS


Knowledge of reality is beneficial to everyone and everyone makes their choice

Immoral choice is a detriment to the moralMoral choice must be a detriment to the immoral

Who knows what lay in the mind of a human being until they act?

By ones actions we know what lay in their mind

A lie is for their cause

A truth used in a lie is for their cause

A truth professed and backed with action is for our cause

When one has a duty to perform their actions or inactions bare the Truth

One who states their hands are tied when they are visibly not, reveal whats in their invisible mind

You people have the power of God, the people and THE LAW on your side if you use them as intended.


10/22

10

Everyone of you people play a vital role in the system to preserve the sanctity of the Constitution of Canadawhich guarantees each and every individual equality in all matters of law which must be addressed in the spiritintended by the Constitution.

Each and every individual persons lives are in your hands to guard and protect equally and the system has

done nothing but aid the immoral in so many ways which I have reiterated upon reiteration in the documents Ihave provided you all.

The Constitution itself if taken verbatim is constantly inconsistent with itself which demands it be read withthe spirit intended which is moral purpose and enforcement to back it.

Common sense alone wouldnt give credence to law and order to protect the immoral but the author knew fullwell what to expect from humans so it was written in the very first line of the Charter .

Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law:

morality moral ways of God enforcement

Its very clear to someone with moral common sense and I am being prejudiced against immorality andlet me suggest if you join me in that prejudice you will serve society well.

Immorality has no place in society and in the spirit as intended by the Constitution there can be nointerpretation that gives immorality any rights to be protected under the Constitution.

The following was extracted from the Law Society of Upper Canada Lawyers Rules of Conduct.

(103) Interpretation(f) rules of professional conduct cannot address every situation, and a lawyer should observe the rules in the spirit

as well as in the letter.

.The Law Society knows that but the people who administer enforcement under their standards do not.

The Constitution (Document) and common sense avers the spirit to be administered.

All the correspondence I have from all you people responsible to administer the law under the Constitutionhave consistently demonstrated you are possessed of the wrong spirit and with all my efforts to help you seethe error of your ways, you have remained steadfast to your convictions.

Now if we can get you people to be as consistent as you have demonstrated and apply your convictions to thespirit intended you will be well received.

All you people have been sponsored by the people of Canada to play as one team for the people of Canada andit is each and every one of you peoples responsibility to point out to each other when you have scored in the

wrong net immediately with an effort to deter reoccurrence.

People will be immoral if they believe they can get away with it which you people have demonstrated quitewell so now you must demonstrate conviction to the eradication of such a belief which creates havoc upon asociety striving for morality.

You must become coherent to reality before you can deal with it and I suggest you exert your right to freedomof thought and use it for the purpose intended to preserve the sanctity of the Constitution which so many havedied for.


11/22

11

Everyone of you know full well what they fought and died for and are still fighting and dying for and youunderstand the necessity when someone else is doing the fighting and dying but when you are asked to juststand up and be counted in support of our rights, you prove our people are fighting and dying for nothing.

That cant be good for their spirits and I can tell you it has done nothing for mine.

It is a completely different issue if you were not cognizant to this absurdity but I have informed you over andover again as I endeavor to do now.

I can not over emphasize the importance of being coherent in every aspect of reality when dealing with mattersof law, for your decisions and actions affect the lives of real people which is a very, very important matter tobe considered.

In your profession being of an investigative nature it is tremendously important that you be cognizant to allfacets of reality so that you may piece everything together to make appropriate decisions.

There is a lot more to the job than just going through the motions of providing a decision to every complaintbecause though you may feel you have processed some paper work from off your desk you must comprehendthat is not your purpose but in fact you are required to be able to read a complaint and be cognizant to what thecomplaint is. That would be a prerequisite of all persons who are assigned to deal with complaints and I

reiterate the particular importance of your field of endeavor and the affects your decisions have upon society.

We are not talking about a complaints department in a department store, where if the customers dont getsatisfaction they neednt do their business with them.

Another thing about decisions is if you are going to write them out and send them they are there for all to seeso it is best you are attentive to the purpose you are hired to address.

We are not talking about hearsay and taken out of context and all that stuff that sees no end to any dispute forwe are talking about truths and relative facts.

I made a little more effort to that point of fact so you may pay particular attention to the fact or evidence whichI have earlier addressed that Kathy Knoakes informed me by letter dated October 13 2006 (pages 21 & 22) ofthe York Regional Police decision to not investigate and in this letter she relates the evidence as sheunderstands it.

It is unbelievable, sorry, I should rephrase that for it is quite believable to me now after 19 months trying tocommunicate with you people, that you people in top positions in investigative service can not comprehend thecomplaint and address it in a coherent manner which of course leaves the problem not dealt with.

Karen Knoakes has informed me that your officers Detective F. Kerr # 110 and Detective/Constable G. Rorkewho have considerable experience in fraud investigation and are widely respected throughout the department

as being the foremost authorities on the topic advised that my dealings were civil in nature and I was referredto the necessary agencies (Rental Tribunal Court Hearing and the Canada Business Corporations Act to assistin resolving my complaint. I was further advised to contact and retain a lawyer to assist in dealing with thesematters.(See page 21)

Don Wilson has committed the criminal act of fraud in a court room of the province right there in front of thejudicator of the ORHT, an independent body at arms length to the Provincial Government which has beenempowered to administer justice in the province which deals with relatively minor situations and ignores acriminal act right there in court. How can they possibly make adequate decisions on minor issues if they cant


12/22


13/22

13

You must remember the mind is capable of wandering and everyone is permitted to believe and think as theywill under the Constitution, but when they act they must do so consistent with the Constitution and in thatendeavor priority must be given to the spirit of the Constitution for many sane reasons which I have related afew.Reality is impervious to perception although highly influenced by perception as is the case of me still writing 19months after the fact to have it addressed in the manner the facts show it must be according to the Constitution.

When one puts their perception to paper it is there for all to see and it will betray them if it is not coincidental to

THE LAW.

Communications are a wonderful opportunity to let your perceptions be known which provides opportunity foranother to comment on and then when they are dealt with in an organized manner by presenting facts whichtrump beliefs, which are just hearsay you will come to an honest reasonable conclusion coincidental to the taskat hand.

If you have now done as I requested and are competent in matters of law as you certainly must be you will seethe most obvious problem.

In such matters as I have presented, considering the importance of the topic it would be irrational to just handle

the situation by oneself and the obvious method of dealing with it is to present it to your supervisor and if thatperson decides to make the decision and cause action upon that decision then they are responsible for it and theconsequences.

It is a must because they are handing out a decision which others suffer the consequences.

So obviously if you are not positive of a decision then you pass the decision to be made higher up.Once again I address the importance of this particular decision because in any sane society criminal acts can notbe condoned in a court of competent jurisdiction for reasons as stated above and for the sake of maintainingsanity throughout Canada.

So with that thought in mind I request that you inform me who you consulted in these matters so I may addressthe matter to one competent to address them.

People out here generally dont have time to play silly bugger with you people whose minds are all over theplace without consideration for the people you are hired to protect.

So by approaching the mattersystematically we can reach where the problem lies and once again I state..

Well let me try it another way.

When I go to McDonalds and order a hamburger with fries at the first window and pay for them at the secondwindow I am not likely to leave until I get them.Normally the McDonalds person is coherent to the fact and with a little communication between us the matter isresolved promptly. If they are incompetent and respond negatively I will not move my vehicle until I get what Ipaid for which would create a bit of a how do ya do with people behind me so a higher authority will take careof the situation and make sure such an asinine occurrence doesnt reoccur. The person who had the opportunity

to deal with the situation had already demonstrated incompetence and will most likely utter comments in defensewhich demonstrates no coherence to the reality for though in their mind they will blame me, for if not for methey wouldnt have suffered the emotional setback but in reality I am the person who was correct for obviousreason and another is the customer is always right in general terms. Reality is always, regardless of perceptions.


14/22

14

So the matter I am addressing could have been handled by a McDonalds person very well at the second window

where first the problem arose and the only way the matter could be resolved is to have someone face to face withme who had the authority to make the proper decision.

Those of you who have corresponded with me know I am persistent and I am not one to argue insignificance noram I one to argue something that I am not certain of, backed with evidence and certainly all you people areaware that a person wouldnt stand pat for so long on a hand if it wasnt solid.

Not once have you people addressed the issues raised by me and that is a significant factor.

Well anyway, just a little more sense for you to ponder and then I will move on to Lawyer File # 10 which willbe available soon on my web sites.

Ill use the McDonalds scenario again because I believe you people relate well there, so everything is going likeclockwork all day perhaps and then I come along to blow it for them.

I didnt get up that morning with thoughts in mind to spoil their day and when all I did is say I didnt get what I

paid for I ended up with that which I paid for and I went away.

Fair is fair and mistakes happen all the time so I eat my hamburger and fries and move on to whatever reality hasin store.

You all know if what happened to me happened to you, you wouldnt be satisfied and I remind you we are not

talking about spilled milk or such.

What happened should not have happened to me or anyone but you have proven that it has happened over andover again and your officers are forever frustrated and I can assure you the victims are a whole lot morefrustrated and with very, very good reason and if you can accept that you are half way to the cure because suchhappenings are not acceptable in a moral society, as simple as that.

Obviously the problem does not go away as you had hoped but hoping has nothing to do with reality other thansome times the wheel spins a match.

If you people were coherent to the consequences of your actions upon society and were the responsible type, ofthe spirit of the Constitution as you are required to be you would have taken the matter I addressed to you to thesource of the problem for it is not my duty to run into McDonalds and fry up my own hamburger and slap ittogether how I would like it and any of you can reason that out to the same conclusion.

To say Cest la vie and shrug your shoulders is not a legitimate option but you opted for it and I continue todemonstrate the consequences which you dont really understand until the consequences are detrimental to you.

I will see that you understand.

If you consider how things work and understand that no matter how well a person applies themselves to a tasksuch as enacting laws or drafting plans when they are put in to action problems arise which I can personallyattest to for in my career as a surveyor I sent many architectural, structural and site plans back to the drawingboard before damage was done. I comprehend how these things work and so must you.The errors happen all the time but with attentiveness to the situation, coherence to the consequences if the errorsare not found and dealt with, and believe me there are always errors to be found, I would be left holding the bag.In this case I have pointed out the problems over and over and over again and I who am coherent to theconsequences have not yet left the site and will not until it is dealt with for although I am not responsible


15/22

15

for the problem I expect the same respect I get from the architects and engineers who thank me for saving theirasses.That is the part that you people do not comprehend because while you put our asses on the line yours are neverconsidered and that is the key to a successful product and explains clearly why we live in hell on earth ratherthan the Heaven On Earth as is Gods aspiration, our supreme master under the Constitution Act, 1982, Part 1,Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Canada is founded on principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law

For those who ask How long am I going to continue to repeat myself I say to you How long?

Everything you need to know regarding these issues are in you hands, the people who are responsible to dealwith them.

When you deal with reality when you have the opportunity to do so you need not deal with realities that provideyou no options.Once the consequence is upon you, you may ponder all that you might have done and wonder why you neverpondered them at the apropos time.

Well, for my final effort to you and Karen, please see that Karen is provided a copy of all the info providedherein and I advise as I stated above that you apply due diligence in these matters which ever way you assign.

The issues concern the people of Canada and their well being and indirectly you can help the world by settingthe course of the future.

If you can not comprehend the bottom line you should not be playing a role which messes with it.

Please deal with all matters you can deal with yourself and forward those you are not qualified to deal with on tothe proper authority. Follow it up. It is too serious a problem to entrust with anyone, especially you people whohave adequately demonstrated you are not worthy of the trust handed to you.

Each of you has been handed down a trust from the top and in common sense practice when laws are legislatedwhich must be consistent with the Constitution Act, 1982 and presuming great care has been diligently applied,but when enacted fails in application those authorized to apply the laws are the first to be alert to theirinadequacies for they are the specialist in their areas and the responsibility lay with them to see the matterresolved?

It is absolutely absurd that you people would say your hands are tied when you tied them yourselves. You haveall the freedom in the world to assert your opinions and I advise that you do so in writing to document yourefforts to preserve your ass.

Due, Due, Due diligence is required in such matters which result in detrimental realities inflicted on humanbeings.

You must treat such cases as if your ass is on the line and it could very well be in so many ways.

It is time for you to think about it, especially if you refuse to think about ours.

I could use a little help here.


16/22

16

http://groups.google.ca/group/schizoholywar?hl=en

You can view Lawyer Files # 1-8 on my web site along withthis Lawyer File # 9

You will read that Don Wilson committed 2 acts of fraud underthe criminal code and 1 count of filing a false information withthe ORHT which is an offense under the Tenant Protection Act,

1997 s.206(2)

Several people mandated to deal with these charges havedeclined to do so which is an offense under the TenantProtection Act, 1997 s. 206 (1)

It is all clearly explained in the Lawyer Files and there will bequite a few more added to my web site which clearlydocuments the conspiracy and corruption as stated.I have a prodigious amount of evidence which proves thatwhich I state and is available for your inspection but I have

provided you with sufficient evidence to prove beyond anydoubt that which I state is true.

On this day Tuesday, March 27, 2007 I formally request you fulfill your obligations to the people of Canadawho are all obliged to comply with the Constitution Act, 1982 and are guaranteed certain rights and protection under theCharter.The people I have addressed are funded by the people of Canada and the Province of Ontario to administer lawconsistent with the Constitution Act, 1982 which they have not only declined to do so but have provided me withevidence which proves their policies, laws, and application of them in Ontario do not support or protect the individual asguaranteed which of course means society is not protected from the immoral as is the intent of the spirit of theConstitutionObviously the intent is not to protect the immoral but by their actions an immoral society is predictable.

Don Wilson committed fraud over $100,000 right in front of the judicator of the ORHT, now the Landlord Tenant BoardI was informed yesterday, but the ORHT declined to commence proceedings.

I have addressed this issue to many people and departments representing the people of the Province of Ontariowho have not been responsive.

Obviously, if they condone criminal acts to occur in provincial buildings which administer justice in Ontario,the individual does not have a hope in hell of ever receiving justice and great possibility of becoming a victim.

By their actions they have proven they are not applying due diligence to deterrence of immorality which is lawenforcement 101.

No matter how efficient and competent a system is there will be victims but having proven they have no line of defenseis incomprehensible considering they have been financed by the people to put a system in place to deter immoralinclination.

I have presented the reality of what has occurred and attempted to describe their pathetic excuse of a legal system in layman termsbut the facts are there and I and the people expect you to act in the spirit of the Constitution Act, 1982 to apply due punishment as adeterrence to ensure such gross immoral inconsistencies with the spirit of the Constitution never reoccur again within the systemresponsible to eradicate immorality. ,

Criminal acts have occurred in the ORHT building 375 Darcy Street, Newmarket which is the jurisdiction ofthe York Regional Police and I hereby request you deal with them.

http://groups.google.ca/group/schizoholywar
http://groups.google.ca/group/schizoholywarhttp://groups.google.ca/group/schizoholywarhttp://groups.google.ca/group/schizoholywar


17/22

17

Lawyer File # 1

Don Wilson, former tenant filed a false and misleading dispute with the ORHT dated June 10 2005stating he had prepaid rent as of August 1 2004 until February 2009. (Aprox.value $43,000) Fraud?He claimed we had a verbal agreement to do with shares of his company Bio Safe.He opened the door about the Corporation so I entered as evidence my purchase agreement which detailed howthe stock was purchased and the April 13 2005 and the May 6 2005 agreements which are pertinent documentsattached to the purchase of shares clarifying and amending discrepancies with the purchase agreement, to prove

Dons dispute was false and misleading information, which is an offense under the Tenant Protection Act,1997 s.206(2)

Don Wilson denied having ever seen these 2 agreements or signed them which the witness to him signing all thepages of the April 13 2005 was present to attest to the fact he signed it. That is Fraud over $100,000 under the

Criminal code.

I may file charges under the Corporations Act but that is not feasible and that is not what this is about.I should also point out that although I may, I also may not, which is not consistent with the spirit of theConstitution which demands you consistently deal with the immoral.

Enforcement does not have that option. You can not have a MORAL COMMON SENSE SOCIETYby lettingthe obvious immoral free to do as they pleaseThe ramifications are many if you dont give him due punishment for the crime and people must know of allplaces you can not commit crime right in front of our judiciaries in our buildings administering justice.

Your top experienced players, highly respected in these matters are incompetent in these matters just observers,apers, parrots.fooled by the crooked establishment and wonder why they walk away with their tails dragging,frustrated. These crooks are making fools of your guys because they are bloody idiots.When you dont know what the hell you are dealing with you will be lead.

I am quite familiar with incompetence and know how to spot them. They are the ones who know everything and

accomplish nothing.

Learn the concept of law, know the law and then put the immoral bastards in jail.

In these writings are the law, deal with the immoral which is your purpose and dont listen to bloody lawyers forChrist sake if they tell you different, arrest them. You arent going to get a warrant from a judge to arrest a judge

Accept the facts you know which I have provided you and deal with the matter realistically.

The ORHT is corrupt, they have tampered with the evidence, didnt record the second day. Refused to file

charges an offense under the law. Who enforces laws if you dont?Start with the ORHT and then move on up until it hits the news and away we go.

Go to 100 judges or justices of the peace until you get a warrant and I suggest you do it simultaneously so theycant get the word out and stop a warrant. There is no reason at all with the evidence provided unless they arecorrupt.Your purpose is clear, dont come back whining the crooks wont let you do your job. Find a way.

Thank youFrank Gallagher


18/22

18


19/22

19


20/22

20


21/22

21


22/22

www.IyffyI.com
http://www.iyffyi.com/http://www.iyffyi.com/http://www.iyffyi.com/

Lawyer File #9

Documents

Transcript of Lawyer File #9