Lawline: Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

109
Part 2: Counseling the Local Food Movement Lawline November 18, 2013 By Cari B. Rincker, Esq.

description

This is the presentation that I gave to Lawline on November 18, 2013. I discuss the proposed regulations under the Food Safety Modernization Act, the National Organic Program, Right-to-Farm law, backyard chickens and urban apiaries, direct meat marketing, on-farm poultry slaughter and Article 5-A licenses, and volunteer farm labor. You can obtain a Free CLE credit at http://bit.ly/12Y978U.

Transcript of Lawline: Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Page 1: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Part 2: Counseling the Local Food Movement

LawlineNovember 18, 2013

By Cari B. Rincker, Esq.

Page 2: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

My Background• Grew up on a beef cattle

farm in Central Illinois• Education– A.S. in Agriculture from

Lake Land College– B.S. in Animal Science

from Texas A & M– M.S. in Ruminant (Beef

Cattle) Nutrition from University of Illinois

Page 3: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

My Background• J.D. from Pace Law School

(2007)– Certificates in Environmental

Law & International Law• Associate at Budd-Falen Law

Offices in Cheyenne, Wyoming (2008-2009)– Environmental Law, Property

Law, Land Use & Federal Lands

– Worked with “cowboys”

Cattle branding in Casper, Wyoming

Page 4: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

My Background

• Have my own food and agriculture law practice in New York City

• Chair of the American Bar Association, General Practice, Solo & Small Firm Division’s Agriculture Law Committee

• My food and agriculture client base– Farmers to ranchers– Small to mid-size agri-business– Food entrepreneurs

Page 5: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Overview• Food Safety Modernization

Act • National Organic Program• Direct Meat Marketing• On Farm Poultry Slaughter• Agriculture Districts and

the Right to Farm• Urban Agriculture• Volunteer Farm Labor

Page 6: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Food Safety Modernization Act

Page 7: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Food Safety Modernization Act

• Food Safety Modernization Act (“FSMA – pronounced Fiz-ma”) was signed into law by President Obama on January 4, 2011

– Shifts the focus from responding to contamination to preventing it• Reactive system to a proactive system

– First major update to food safety law in 70 years

Page 8: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

(C) Cari Rincker, 2013 8

Food Safety Modernization Act

• FDA released proposed rules on January 2013

• Awaiting final rules

Page 9: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Food Safety Modernization Act

• The proposed rule mandates the establishment of two primary regulations:

– Standards for produce production (The “Produce Rule”)

– Food safety measures for facilities that process food for human consumption (the “Preventative Controls Rule”)

Page 10: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Proposed Produce Safety Rule

• Establishes science-based minimum standards for the safe growing, harvesting, packing and holding of produce on farms

• Proposed new standards regulate the following areas:– Worker training, health & hygiene– Agricultural water– Biological soil amendments of animal

origin– Domesticated and wild animals– Equipment, tools and buildings

FDA – FAQ’s

Page 11: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Proposed Produce Safety Rule

• Farms fall into one of three categories:– Exempt – Modified

requirements– Full requirements

National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition

Page 12: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Proposed Produce Safety Rule• What kind of produce?

– Most fruits and vegetables in the raw / unprocessed state

– Exemptions: Doesn’t apply to raw agricultural commodities that are: • rarely consumed raw

– E.g., potatoes• Produced for personal or

on-farm consumption• Destined for commercial

processing (with documentation)– E.g., canning, bagged

salads and leafy greens

Page 13: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Proposed Produce Safety Rule

A farm is exempt if the average annual sales during the previous 3-year period is no more than $25K

– This is sales not profit

Page 14: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Modified Requirements

• If the produce will undergo additional commercial processing that kills harmful microorganisms, then the produce is not covered

– However, the farm will be subject to recordkeeping requirements and the compliance and enforcement requirements of the Produce Rule

National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition

Page 15: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Modified Requirements

• If the farm on average over the previous 3 years has less than $500K in gross annual sales and the majority of the food is sold directly to a “qualified end-user” (e.g., consumer, restaurant or retail food establishment) then the farmer must:– Provide the name and complete address of

the farm where the produce was grown on either a food packaging label or on a sign at the point of purchase

– Comply with the compliance and enforcement requirements of the Produce Rule; and

– Be subject to the provisions regarding the withdrawal of the farm’s status as a partially covered (“qualified exempt”) operation.

National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition

Page 16: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Proposed Preventative Controls Rule• A “facility” is a location that manufactures, processes, packs or holds food for

consumption in the United States

• FDA will look at whether there are any manufacturing or processing activities– Irradiation– Cutting/coring/chopping/slicing– Canning– Coating with things other than wax/oil/resin– Drying that creates a distinct commodity– Artificial ripening– Cooking– Pasteurizing/homogenizing– Infusing– Distilling– Salting– Smoking– Grinding/milling– Freezing– Slaughtering animals or post-slaughter operations

National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition

Page 17: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Proposed Preventative Controls Rule

• FDA looks at the type of manufacturing and processing activities – Whether the farm is conducting

the activities on its own agricultural products• Reduced requirements

– Whether the facility is manufacturing and processing someone else’s agricultural products

National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition

Page 18: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Proposed Preventative Controls Rule

• Proposed rule has two main points:– Requirements for hazard analysis

and risk-based preventative controls; and

– Revisions to existing Current Good Manufacturing Practice (“GMP”) requirements

• Some facilities are subject to only one and not the other- important to see them as two different requirements

National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition

Page 19: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Proposed Preventative Controls Rule

• Who is subject to the Hazard Analysis and Risk-Based Preventive Controls (“HARPC”)?

• 3 categories– Exemptions– Modified

requirements– Full requirements

National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition

Page 20: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Exemptions from Hazard Analysis and Risk-Based Preventative Controls

• Following products are exempt– Juice– Seafood– Dietary Supplements– Alcoholic beverages– Low-acid canned foods

• Grain elevators and warehouses that are solely engaged in storing agricultural commodities or packaged food

• Small or very small on-farm businesses that conduct certain low-risk manufacturing and processing, packing or holding activities– Making jams and jellies– Manufacturing honey and maple syrup

National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition

Page 21: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Facilities Subject to Modified HARPC Requirements

• If the facility on average over the previous 3 years has less than $500K in gross annual sales and the majority of the food is sold directly to a “qualified end-user” (e.g., consumer, restaurant or retail food establishment) then the facility must maintain certain records and must certify that:

– It qualifies for modified requirements; and – It is implementing and monitoring preventive or complying with

applicable non-federal food safety law and must display a label or sign with the complete business address of the facility at the point of sale

National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition

Page 22: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Proposed Preventative Controls Rule

• Who must comply with the current Good Manufacturing Practices (“GMPs”)?– Only facilities that are

exempt are warehouses and grain elevators that store raw agricultural commodities (including fruits and vegetables) intended for further processing

National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition

Page 23: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

National Organic Program

• Harrison Pittman et al., “A Legal Guide to the National Organic Program”, The National Agriculture Law Center (January 2011) available at http://nationalaglawcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/assets/articles/pittman_organicprogram.pdf (last visited September 29, 2013).

– NALC has a great online law library on a myriad of legal topics affecting the food and agriculture industry (“Reading Room” tab online)

Page 24: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

National Organic Program

• Congress enacted the Organic Foods Production Act (“OFPA”) in 1990– to create “national standards governing the marketing of

certain agricultural products as organically produced products,”– assure consumers that “organically produced products meet a

consistent standard,” and – facilitate “interstate commerce in fresh and processed food

that is organically produced.”

• OFPA directed the U.S. Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) to establish national standards for organic production and handling

Pittman at 1

Page 25: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

National Organic Program

• On December 21, 2000, USDA published the final rule that created the organic standards– Directed that it be administered by the

USDA Agriculture Marketing Service (“AMS”)

• As of October 21, 2002, for a producer or handler to sell, label or represent that an agricultural product is “organic” then he/she/it must comply with NOP standards– Limited exceptions

Pittman at 1

Page 26: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

NOP Applicability

• Exceptions to NOP certification requirements– 1. Production or handling operation

that has a gross income from sales totaling $5K or less• Primary direct-to-consumer and indirect

markets• Still must comply with applicable organic

production and handling requirements – Doesn’t have to submit an organic system plan

• Must also comply with labeling requirements for exempted operations

• Cannot be used as ingredients in processed products identified as “organic”?

7 CFR 205.100(a)

Page 27: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

NOP Applicability

• Exceptions to NOP certification requirements– 2. Handling operation that only handles

agricultural products containing less than 70% organic ingredients by total weight• Must comply with the standards for avoiding

the commingling and contact of organic products with prohibited substances

• Labeling standards for excluded operations and multi-ingredient packaged products with less than 70% organic

• Record-keeping requirements for exempted operations

7 CFR 205.101(a)(3)

Page 28: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

NOP Applicability

• Exceptions to NOP certification requirements– 3. Handling operation that identifies

ingredients as “organic” only on the information panel only• Must comply with the standards for

avoiding the commingling and contact of organic products with prohibited substances

• Labeling standards for excluded operations and multi-ingredient packaged products with less than 70% organic

• Record-keeping requirements for exempted operations

7 CFR 205.101(a)(4)(i)-(iii)

Page 29: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

NOP Applicability• 2 main exclusions from NOP certification

– 1. handling operations that sell only “organic” products that are packaged or otherwise enclosed in a container before the operation receives or acquires the product and it remains in the same package

– 2. retail food establishments that process on the premises “raw and ready-to-eat” food from products that were previously labeled as organic.

7 CFR 205.101(b)

Page 30: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Recordkeeping Requirements

Certified Operations

Exempted Operations

Excluded Operations

Page 31: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Recordkeeping Requirements• Certified Operations

– Must maintain records that relate to the “production or handling of agricultural products sold or labeled as organically produced” for five years beyond the date the records are created.

– The records must include a detailed history of the substances applied to the operation’s fields or agricultural products, the names and addresses of the persons who applied the substances, the dates and rates the substances were applied, and the method used to apply the substances.

– They must also be sufficient to demonstrate that the operation has complied with all applicable NOP requirements.

– The records must be available during normal business hours to representatives of the Secretary, the State official governing a State’s organic program, if applicable, and the certifying agent for inspection and copying.7 USC 6511(d) and 7 CFR 205.103

Page 32: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Recordkeeping Requirements• Exempted Operations– Must maintain records sufficient to demonstrate

that ingredients identified as “organic” were organically produced and handled and to verify the quantities produced from those ingredients.

– The records must be kept for at least three years after they are created.• USDA Representatives and the state official governing a

state organic program must be allowed access to the records for inspection and copying during normal business hours.

7 CFR 205.101(c)

Page 33: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Recordkeeping Requirements

• Excluded Operations– Confusing and unsettled– the comments state, in pertinent part, that

“[e]ach exempt, excluded, and certified operation should maintain the records which demonstrate compliance with the Act and the regulations applicable to it and . . . establish . . . that the exempt, excluded, or certified operation is and has been in compliance with the Act and the regulations.”

Page 34: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Allowed and Prohibited Substances, Methods and Ingredients

• For a certified operation to sell, label, or represent a product as “organic,” it must produce or handle the product without the use of synthetic substances and ingredients, unless the substances or ingredients are specifically listed as allowed on the national list of approved substances (“National List”).

– A “synthetic” is “[a] substance that is formulated or manufactured by a chemical process or by a process that chemically changes a substance extracted from naturally occurring plant, animal, or mineral sources, except that such term shall not apply to substances created by naturally occurring biological processes.”

7 CFR 205.105 and 7 USC 6502(21)

Page 35: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Allowed and Prohibited Substances, Methods and Ingredients

• Certified operations must also produce and handle products without the use of prohibited nonsynthetic or nonagricultural substances unless on the National List

• There are certain vaccines, for example, that can be used for limited purposes that are on the National List

7 CFR 205.105 and 205.2

Page 36: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Allowed and Prohibited Substances, Methods and Ingredients

• Cannot use an “excluded method”– Methods used to genetically modified organisms– Influence their growth and development by means

that are not possible under natural conditions• Cell fusion, micro/macro-encapsulation and DNA

technology (e.g., gene deletion, gene doubling, introducing foreign genes)

– Excluded methods do not include the use of traditional breeding, conjugation, fermentation, hybridization, in vitro fertilization, or tissue culture

Page 37: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

NOP Organic Production and Handling Standards

• Organic System Plan– A producer or handler of a production or handling operation seeking

certification must submit an “organic system plan” to its certifying agent or, if applicable, to the governing official of its state’s organic program.

– An “organic system plan” is a plan of management of an organic production or handling operation that has been agreed to by the producer or handler and the certifying agent and that includes written plans concerning all aspects of agricultural production or handling” as set forth in OFPA and the final rule’s organic production and handling requirements.• Including recordkeeping procedures• Describe management practices

7 USC 6513

Page 38: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Land Requirements• Any field or farm parcel from which harvested crops are

intended to be sold, labeled, or represented as ‘organic,’ must not have had any prohibited substances applied to it for the three years preceding the harvest of the crop

• The field or farm parcel must also “[h]ave distinct, defined boundaries and buffer zones such as runoff diversions to prevent the unintended application of a prohibited substance to the crop or contact with a prohibited substance applied to adjoining land that is not under organic management.”

7 CFR 205.202(b)-(c)

Page 39: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Soil Fertility and Crop Nutrient Management Practice Standards

• Under the soil fertility and crop nutrient standards, a producer must “select and implement tillage and cultivation practices that maintain or improve the physical, chemical, and biological condition of soil and minimize soil erosion.”

• A producer must also manage crop nutrients and soil fertility by rotating crops, using cover crops, and by applying plant and animal materials to the land.

7 CFR 205.203(c)

Page 40: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Seeds and Planting Stock Practice Standard

• A producer must use organically grown seeds, annual seedlings, and planting stock in their operations– There are some limited

exceptions…

7 CFR 205.204(a)

Page 41: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Crop Rotation

• A certified organic producer must implement a “crop rotation” practice into its operation– Example: Corn and

Beans

7 CFR 205.2

Page 42: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Livestock Production• Livestock products intended

to be sold, labeled or represented as “organic” must be produced from livestock raised in organic management conditions from the last third of gestation or hatching– 3 exceptions

• Poultry – from second day of life• Milk- dairy animals with 1 year

of organic handling• Breeder livestock- at the time of

birth

7 CFR 205.236

Page 43: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Livestock Feed

• Must be given a feed ration that is composed of organic agricultural products– Includes grains, hay,

silage, pasture and fodder

– Note that organic does not necessarily mean grass fed

7 CFR 205.2

Page 44: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Livestock Health and Well-Being• Required to establish and

maintain preventative livestock health care practices– Must administer vaccines and other

veterinary biologics when needed

• Must allow “for exercise, freedom of movement, and reduction of stress” appropriate for the livestock species– Must accommodate the animal’s

natural behavior

Pittman at 21-22

Page 45: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Temporary Variances• Under certain circumstances, producers and handlers can obtain temporary variances

from the – soil fertility and crop nutrient management standard; – seed and planting stock standard; – crop rotation standard; – crop, pest, weed, and disease management standard; – origin of livestock standard; – livestock feed standard; – livestock health care practice standard; – livestock living conditions standard; – organic handling requirements; – facility pest management standard; and the – commingling and contact with prohibited substance prevention standard.

• The Secretary may issue a temporary variance due to natural disasters, “[d]amage caused by drought, wind, flood, excessive moisture, hail, tornado, earthquake, fire, or other business interruption[,]” and for certain research purposes.

7 CFR 205.290(a)(1)-(3)

Page 46: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

NOP: Labels, Labeling, and Market Information

• 4 Labeling Categories– 100% Organic– “Organic”– “made with organic

_______”– Products with less than

70% organically produced ingredients

• Percentage is determined by weight in solid form

Pittman at 27

Page 47: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Labeling Categories: 100% Organic

• For a raw or processed product to be sold, labeled, or represented as “100 percent organic,” it must contain 100 percent organically produced ingredients.

• Products in this labeling category may display “on the principal display panel, information panel, and any other panel of the package and on any labeling or market information” pertaining to the product – the term “100 percent organic” to modify the name of the

product, and – the term “organic” to identify the organic ingredients contained

in products containing two or more ingredients.Pittman at 28

Page 48: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

(C) Cari Rincker, 2013 48

Labeling Categories: OrganicFor a raw or processed product to be sold, labeled, or represented as “organic”– the second labeling category– it “must contain at least 95 percent organically produced raw or processed agricultural products.”

– The remaining ingredients in the product must be organically produced, unless they are either commercially unavailable in organic form or are “nonagricultural substances or nonorganically produced agricultural products produced” in accordance with the National List requirements.

Pittman at 28-29

Page 49: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Labeling Categories: made with organic ___________

• Multi-ingredient products that are comprised of at least seventy percent but less than 95% organic ingredients fall within the third labeling category, “made with organic (specified ingredients or food group(s)).”

– Example: Candy bar “made with organic peanuts”

Pittman at 30

Page 50: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Labeling Categories: 70% Organic ingredients

The organic ingredients contained in products falling within the fourth labeling category, “products with less than 70 percent organically produced ingredients,” must have been produced and handled in accordance with the organic production and handling requirements.

– The packages of products in this labeling category are prohibited from displaying the USDA seal.

Page 51: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II
Page 52: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

NOP Certification• 6 Basic Requirements

– Comply with all the OFPA and NOP production and handling stands

– Create, implement and annually update and organic system plan

– Allow a certifying agent to conduct on-site inspections

– Maintain records– Make payments to the certifying

agent– The person must notify the

certifying agent when there is an application of a prohibited substance or change in the operation

Page 53: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

NOP Compliance• If certified operation

knowingly sells or label a product that is organic when it did not comply with the standards:– Suspension or revocation

of certification– Civil penalties up to $10K

per violation– Administrative hearings

Pittman at 50

Page 54: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Direct Marketing of Meat Products

Martha Goodsell and Dr. Tatiana Stanton, “A Resource Guide to: Guide to Direct Marketing,” Cornell University Cooperative Extension (January 2011).

Page 55: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Federal Meat Inspection Act

Are the animals amenable?• Amenable• Amenable Livestock- Cattle, sheep, goats• Amenable poultry- chickens, turkey, ducks, geese,

guineas, ratites (ostrich, emus, and rhea), squabs

• Nonamenable – not subject to the Federal Meat Inspection Act• Game animals and birds• Even if a farmer raises a domesticated species, it is

still considered non-amenable

Cornell at 11

Page 56: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Federal Meat Inspection Act

• Requires imported meat products to have inspection requirements equivalent to the U.S. requirements– Must remain in the

original packing the country of origin and foreign establishment number of the label

Cornell at 15

Page 57: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Custom Exempt Slaughterhouses• May offer slaughtering

services without federal inspection and oversight– Should not be confused with

state slaughterhouses that are inspected by state officials

• For the owner themselves or their household– Must be stamped “Not for

Sale”• Custom-exempt plants are

inspected periodically

My family would harvest our 4-H projects and steers– example of custom slaughter

Cornell at 19

Page 58: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Nonamenable Slaughtering and Processing Facilities

• There are specialized state facilities that conduct butchering and processing for nonamenable animals– In New York, must obtain an

Article 5-A license– Higher standards than

conventional custom-exempt plants• Example: hot water at 180°

F vs. 170° F

Cornell at 21

Page 59: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Selling Meat Direct to the Consumer

• In New York, all red meat from amenable species must be slaughtered at a USDA inspected facility – Some states allow for

state- inspected slaughter facilities if sold intrastate

Page 60: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

On Farm Poultry Slaughter

CARI B. RINCKER AND PAT B. DILLON, “FIELD MANUAL: LEGAL GUIDE FOR NEW YORK FARMERS AND FOOD ENTREPRENEURS” (2013). (Chapter 23) (pp 339-346)

Bliven, Lynn et al., “On-Farm Poultry Slaughter Guidelines,” Cornell University Cooperative Extension (July 2012).

Page 61: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

On Farm Poultry Slaughter • General rule: poultry must be slaughtered in a USDA

inspected facility– Poultry Produce Inspection Act (“PPIA”)

• 1000 Bird Limit Exemption: New York poultry producer who processes and sells less than 1000 chickens or 250 turkeys – 1 turkey = 4 chickens

=

Combinationsare okay

Ex: 50 turkeys& 800 chickens

Page 62: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

1000 Bird Exemption• Additional Requirements

– Must be chickens and turkeys that he/she raised on the farm;

– Poultry farmer does not engage in the buying or selling poultry products other than those produced from poultry raised on his/her farm;

– Slaughter and processing are conducted under sanitary standards, practices and procedures that are sound, clean, not adulterated or misbranded, and fit for human food;

– Poultry producer keeps the required records; and,

– Poultry does not move into interstate commerce.

Rincker at 339-340

Page 63: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

1000 Bird Exemption

• Slaughter and processing must be done on site – Poultry farmer may

own their own equipment or rent a Mobile Poultry Processing Unit (“MPPU”)

Rincker at 340

Page 64: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

1000 Bird Exemption

• It is per farm, not per farmer– Example: farm partnership

formed between Grandpa (400 chickens), daughter (200 chickens) and two sons (400 chickens), and 1 grandson (100 turkeys) – the farm enterprise is not eligible for the 1000 Bird exemption

• It is recommend by the NYS Department of Agriculture & Markets that the poultry be sold direct to the consumer

Page 65: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

1000 Bird Exemption• Food label must include:

– Product name and description; – Inspection Legend and Establishment

Number (for farms processing under this exemption, it should say “Exempted – P.L. 90-492);

– Net weight statement (includes “packed on” date, “sell by” date, “net wt lb.”, “price per lb”, and net weight);

– Name and address of the farm; and,– Safe handling statement (if processed under

on-farm exemption, then label must say “Exempt P.L. 90-492”).

• If there is a nutritional claim, then a Nutritional Facts Panel must be included

Page 66: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Safe Handling Instructions

Page 67: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Producer/Grower 1000 Bird Limit Exemption

• Processing Guidelines– Water used in processing, cleaning and sanitation, in chilling

tanks and ice manufacture should be potable and must be tested annual to determine potability;

– Any approved sanitizing agents for use on food contact surfaces must be used in prescribed concentrations and methods;

– Any agents (including lubricants) used on equipment maintenance must be food grade;

– The on-farm processing facility must be managed in a manner that protects the environment (e.g., surface and groundwater, and soils).

Page 68: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Good Manufacturing Practices (“GMP’s”)

• Provide Training for Processing Personnel• Establish Health & Hygiene Policies • Maintain a Clean Processing Environment• Control Pests• Control Access to the Processing Facility• Provide Potable Water• Securely Store Processing Equipment, Utensils, Supplies

& Materials• Manage Processing Wastes

Page 69: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

(Sanitation) Standard Operating Procedures (“SOP’s” “SSOP’s”)

• Site Management & Pest Control• Personnel Health & Hygiene• Pre-Operational Inspection & Sanitation

Schedule• Daily Operational Sanitation Maintenance• Chill Tank, Giblet Chill Containers &

Refrigeration Temperature Monitoring• Post-Operational Sanitation Schedule

Page 70: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (“HACCP”) Plan

Even though a HACCP Plan is not required for birds slaughtered and processed under the Producer/Grower 1000 Bird Limit Exemption it is highly recommended

• 7 Steps of HACCP– Access food safety hazards associated with all areas of your product– Determine Critical Control Points (“CCP’s”)– Establish the Critical Limits for each CCP– Establish Monitoring Procedures for CCP’s– Establish Corrective Actions to be taken when CCP’s are not in control– Establish Record-Keeping Procedures– Establish Verification Procedures to determine that the system is working

Page 71: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Article 5-A Licenses in New York

• If a farmer harvests more than 1000 birds yet stays in intrastate commerce in New York, this farmer does not have to harvest the poultry in a USDA inspected facility if the farm obtains an Article 5-A license– This is Article 5-A under the New York

Agriculture & Markets Law

Rincker at 342

Page 72: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Article 5-A Licenses in New York

• Exclusions– Bona fide farmer who butchers his

own domestic animals or fowl on his farm exclusively for use by the farmer and his/her household

– A custom slaughterer• This is where animals are delivered by

the owner for slaughter for use in the household of the buyer (i.e., cannot sell the meat or carcass)

– 1000 Bird Exemption– Any person who donates the poultry

to a charitable or not-for-profit organization

Rincker at 343

Page 73: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Article 5-A Licenses• 2 year license - $200

application• NYSDAM must be satisfied with

the equipment and sanitation• NYSDAM may inspect the

premises• A drawing must be submitted

included the specifications of the facility

• Inspection results must be posted on the premises

Page 74: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Land Use & Zoning

Page 75: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Agriculture Districts

Article XIV, Section 4 of the NYS Constitution provides for the policy of New York to encourage the development and improvement of its agriculture lands for the production of food and other agricultural products

Page 76: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Agriculture Districts• Article 25-AA of NY Agric. & Mkts Law

– “Local governments, when exercising their powers to enact and administer comprehensive plans and local laws, ordinances, rules or regulations, shall exercise these powers in such manner as may realize the policy and goals set forth in this article, and shall not unreasonably restrict or regulate farm operations within agricultural districts in contravention of the purposes of this article unless it can be shown that the public health or safety is threatened.” Section 305-a.

Page 77: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Agriculture Districts

• Among other advantages, farms located in agricultural districts are typically exempt from many local and state regulations including State Environmental Quality Review (“SEQR”) and some building codes for building construction.

– Farms located in agriculture districts should be free of overly restrictive land use regulations.

(C) Cari Rincker, 2013 77

Page 78: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

(C) Cari Rincker, 2013 78

Right-to-Farm Law

• Nearly every state around the U.S. has a Right to Farm law

• Right-to-Farm laws bar nuisance suits against farmers and ranchers using sound production practices in agricultural districts

Page 79: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Right to Farm• Under section 308[1], NYSDAM issues opinions

upon request on “sound agricultural practices”• NYSDAM may consider:– operation of farm equipment– proper use of agricultural chemicals and other crop

protection methods– direct sale to consumers of on-farm products– agricultural tourism

• NYSDAM may consult with USDA and/or Cornell

Page 80: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Right to Farm• Upon issuance of an opinion, NYSDAM must

publish a notice in a newspaper in the surrounding area. See NY Agric. & Mkts § 308[2].

• If the farmer is conducting a sound agricultural practice on any land in an agricultural district and subject to an agricultural assessment, then said practice is not considered a private nuisance. See NY Agric. & Mkts § 308[3].

Page 81: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

NYSDAM Determination of Unreasonably Restrictive Laws

• Whether the requirements will:– adversely affect the farm operator’s ability to manage the farm

operation effectively and efficiently; – restrict production options which could affect the economic

viability of the farm; and– cause a lengthy delay in the construction of a farm building or

implementation of a practice; the cost of compliance for the farm operation affected

• Affect the availability of less onerous means to achieve the locality’s objective.

• Relevant standards established under State law and regulations.

Page 82: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Right to Farm at the Local Level• NYSDAM encourages localities to

provide for a Right to Farm exemption in its local land use law– “[n]othing contained herein shall be

deemed to limit the right to farm as set forth in Article 25-AA of the NYS Agriculture & Markets Law....”

• Local laws oftentimes provide that no “sound agricultural practice” as defined in Article 25-AA shall be deemed prohibited under the ordinance or subject to its permit requirements.

Page 83: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Right to Farm Disputes

• Can be resolved for free through the New York State Agriculture Mediation Program (“NYSDAM”) between the farmer and the neighbor

Page 84: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Backyard Chickens

• Cities that allow for the use of backyard chickens may place specifications on the following: – number of hens, – setbacks for coops/pens, – number of roosters (if allowed at all), – neighbor consent, – pest control, and – feed storage.

Page 85: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Beekeeping

• Local zoning ordinances that allow for urban apiaries may post regulations for the lot size and setbacks

• Beekeepers may still be subject to tort liability– People v. McOmber

Page 86: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Examples of New York Ordinances with Urban Livestock

• Albany- no livestock allowed

Chapter 115, Article VIII, § 115-31: No person shall keep, harbor, or shelter any farm animal or fowl within the City of Albany. For purposes of this article, farm animal or fowl shall include cows, cattle, horses, ponies, donkeys, mules, pigs, goats, sheep, chickens, ducks, geese, or other animals or fowl usually known as "farm animals or fowl," but not solely limited to the aforementioned and not including common household pets.

Guide to Urban Farming at #29

Page 87: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Examples of New York Ordinances with Urban Livestock

• Buffalo

Chapter 341, Article II, § 341-11.1: It shall be lawful for any person to keep, permit or allow any domesticated chicken hens ** *under the following terms and conditions: A. No more than five chicken hens shall be allowed for each single-family

dwelling or multifamily dwelling. B. No chicken hens shall be allowed in multifamily complexes, including

duplexes, without the expressed written consent of the owner of the building and all tenants residing in the building other than the applicant.

C. No chicken hens shall be allowed without the express written consent of all residents residing on property adjacent to that of the applicant.

Guide to Urban Farming at #29

Cont.

Page 88: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Examples of New York Ordinances with Urban Livestock

• BuffaloD. No roosters shall be allowed. E. Chicken hens are to be restricted to the rear or backyard of any lot

in a residential zoning district or the rear or backyard of a residential use in all other zoning districts.

F. Chicken hens shall be kept as pets and for personal use only; no person shall sell eggs or meat or engage in chicken breeding or fertilizer production for commercial purposes.

G. Persons wishing to keep chicken hens within the City of Buffalo must obtain a license from the Office of the City Clerk after payment of an annual fee of $25, and after inspection and approval of the coop and cage that chicken hens are to be kept in by an Animal Control Officer, pursuant to § 341-11.4 hereof.Guide to Urban Farming at #29

Cont.

Page 89: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Examples of New York Ordinances with Urban Livestock

• Buffalo

Chapter 511, Article XXII, § 511-115: It shall be unlawful for any person to stable, keep as a pet, or permit to remain any cloven-footed or hoofed animal, such as, but not limited to, cows, goats, horses, pigs, or sheep, on any lot or premises within a residential district or business district as classified under Chapter 511 of the Code of the City of Buffalo, and in no case shall such animal be kept on the same lot or premises with a dwelling.

Guide to Urban Farming at #29

Page 90: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Examples of New York Ordinances with Urban Livestock

• Geneva

Chapter 77, Article I, § 77-2: No person shall keep or harbor any bees in the city. Any beehive used or occupied by bees is hereby declared to be a nuisance; and it shall be unlawful to keep or maintain any such hive in the city.

Guide to Urban Farming at #29

Page 91: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Examples of New York Ordinances with Urban Livestock

• Geneva

Chapter 77, Article I, § 77-3: No person shall keep or harbor any chickens, ducks, geese or other domesticated fowl in the city except in the AR, Agricultural Residential Use Districts and F Industrial Use Districts and not closer than 200 feet to any house, except the owner's, apartment building, church, school, hospital or any other building customarily used or occupied by human beings, such as but not limited to stores, hotels, restaurants, offices and factories.

Guide to Urban Farming at #29

Page 92: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Examples of New York Ordinances with Urban Livestock

• GenevaChapter 77, Article I, § 77-4: No person shall keep or harbor any cattle, horses and sheep in the city except as follows:

– Cattle, horses and sheep may be kept in the city in the AR, Agricultural District if maintained not closer than 100 feet to any house except the owner's, apartment building, church, school, hospital or any other building customarily used or occupied by human beings, such as but not limited to stores, hotels, restaurants, offices and factories.

– Every person maintaining animals as permitted in Subsection A of this section shall keep clean and sanitary every shed, barn or structure housing said animals.

– Every such shed, barn or structure shall be thoroughly cleaned at least once every 24 hours and refuse from the same shall, when collected, be kept in airtight containers until disposed of in accordance with any other provisions of this Code.

Guide to Urban Farming at #29

Page 93: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Examples of New York Ordinances with Urban Livestock

• Geneva

Chapter 77, Article I, § 77-5: No person shall keep or harbor any goats, pigs or swine in the city; and it shall be unlawful to keep or maintain any goat pen, pig sty or other building for the housing of goats, pigs or swine.

Guide to Urban Farming at #29

Page 94: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Examples of New York Ordinances with Urban Livestock

• New Rochelle

Chapter 89, Article VI, § 89-16: The Council of the City of New Rochelle hereby finds that the keeping, permitting, harboring and/or raising of farm animals, including but not limited to those of the equine, swine, bovine, ruminant and avian species on parcels of land with inadequate size and setbacks within the jurisdiction of the City of New Rochelle causes offensive odors which interfere with the quality of life of the public, property values and the public health, safety and welfare of the community.

Guide to Urban Farming at #29

Page 95: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Examples of New York Ordinances with Urban Livestock

• North Tonawanda

Chapter 57, § 57-2: From and after the enactment of this ordinance, it shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to harbor or maintain any animals or livestock within the limits of the City of North Tonawanda, New York. This section shall not be construed to apply to slaughterhouses and abattoirs that are covered in the provisions of other city ordinances.

Guide to Urban Farming at #29

Page 96: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Examples of New York Ordinances with Urban Livestock

• Rochester

Chapter 30, Article I, § 30-12: No person, firm, association or corporation shall bring into, keep, hold, offer for sale, sell or kill or allow to be kept, held, offered for sale, sold or killed in the City of Rochester any live animals, except animals for show or exposition purposes only, and except white mice, white rats, cats, dogs, horses, mules and donkeys.

Guide to Urban Farming at #29

Page 97: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Examples of New York Ordinances with Urban Livestock

• Rochester

No person, firm, association or corporation shall bring into, keep, hold, offer for sale, sell or kill or allow to be kept, held, offered for sale, sold or killed in the City of Rochester any chickens, geese, ducks, doves or pigeons, turkeys or other animals or owls, except persons holding a poulterer's license, without having a license therefor issued by the Chief of Police and under and pursuant to the provisions of this chapter; provided, however, that no license shall be required for any animals or fowls in transit through the said City; and provided, however, that nothing herein contained shall apply to slaughterhouses, cattle yards or any place where any cattle or swine are killed or dressed; and provided, however, that nothing herein contained shall apply to any cattle, sheep or swine brought into the City and directly transported to a slaughterhouse or cattle yard.

Guide to Urban Farming at #29

Page 98: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Examples of New York Ordinances with Urban Livestock

• Syracuse

Chapter 16, Article XVIII, § 12-62: No person shall keep within the city of Syracuse any animal which is deemed to include a reptile, bird and/or an animal of a species which is wild, ferocious, fierce, dangerous, poisonous or naturally inclined to do harm*…

• In Chapter 16, Article XVIII, § 12-63, wild, ferocious, fierce, dangerous, and poisonous animals, birds and reptiles are defined to include cows, guinea hens, goats, sheep, and swine, excluding Chinese Potbelly pigs.

Guide to Urban Farming at #29

Page 99: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Examples of New York Ordinances with Urban Livestock

• White Plains

Title V, Chapter 5-2, Article I, § 5-2-1: A. No live chickens, geese, ducks or other fowl shall be kept in the city unless they are securely enclosed in such a manner as to prevent them from straying from the premises of the person owning them.

Title V, Chapter 5-2, Article I, § 5-2-2: A. It shall be unlawful for any person to allow any livestock which is under his ownership, care, custody or control to run at large.

Guide to Urban Farming at #29

Page 100: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Examples of New York Ordinances with Urban Livestock

• Yonkers

Chapter 65, § 65-23: No person shall keep, cause or allow to be kept on, in or about any premises or property any poultry, fowl or other birds, except as hereinafter provided: – It shall be lawful to keep for purposes of sale live

poultry in a live poultry market.

Guide to Urban Farming at #29

Page 101: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Volunteer Farm Labor

Page 102: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Volunteer Labor on Farms/ CSA’s

• Types– “Work Share” or “Half

Work Share”– Travel-Based

Volunteers– Informal Worker Shares– Casual Volunteers

Page 103: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

“Compensated” Farm Volunteers

• Minimum Wage?– Fair Labor Standards Act

(“FLSA”) – definitions of

“employee” and “volunteer”

Page 104: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

“Compensated” Farm Volunteers• Analysis:– Is the volunteer working in

expectation of compensation?

– Is the volunteer displacing employees?

– Does the volunteer give the food business a competitive advantage?

– Is the farm offering educational benefits?

Page 105: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Is the Farm Exempt from Federal Minimum Wage?

• If a farm utilizes fewer than 500 man-days of labor in any calendar quarter of the previous year then they are exempt from federal minimum wage requirements

– 29 U.S.C. § 213(a)(6), 29 C.F.R. Part 780 Subpart D. – If volunteers are considered employees, then they

contribute to the man-day calculation.

Page 106: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Insurance• Workers Compensation

• Farm liability and commercial insurance policies typically exclude coverage for “employees”

• Commercial insurance will likely cover unpaid volunteers but not “compensated” farm volunteers

Page 107: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Questions on Being an Agriculture Lawyer

• Fridays with Cari Skype Calls– First Friday of the

month at 2pm ET– RSVP to

[email protected]– No charge

Page 108: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

I Just Wrote a Book

Cari B. Rincker & Patrick B. Dillon, “Field Manual: Legal Guide for New York Farmers & Food Entrepreneurs” (2013)

Available at http://www.amazon.com/Field-Manual-Legal-Farmers-Entrepreneurs/dp/1484965191

Page 109: Lawline:  Counseling the Local Food Movement Part II

Please Stay in Touch• Send Me Snail Mail: 535 Fifth Avenue, 4th Floor, New

York, NY 10017• Call Me: (212) 427-2049 (office)• Email Me: [email protected]• Visit My Website: www.rinckerlaw.com • Read My Food & Ag Law Blog: www.rinckerlaw.com/blog• Tweet Me: @CariRincker @RinckerLaw• Facebook Me: www.facebook.com/rinckerlaw • Link to Me: http://www.linkedin.com/in/caririncker • Skype Me: Cari.Rincker