- 493 -

LAW REVIEW ARTICLES

Pre-1970

Wilsie H. Adams, Jr., The Freedom of Information Act and Pretrial Discovery, 43 Mil. L. Rev. 1(1969).

Charles P. Bennett, Comment, The Freedom of Information Act: Is it a Clear Public RecordsLaw?, 34 Brooklyn L. Rev. 72 (1967).

Arthur J. Caron, Jr., Federal Procurement and the Freedom of Information Act, 28 Fed. B.J. 271(1968).

John E. Cavanaugh, The Freedom of Information Act and Government Contractors - Problems inProtection of Confidential Information, 2 Pub. Cont. L.J. 225 (1969).

Kenneth C. Davis, The Information Act: A Preliminary Analysis, 34 U. Chi. L. Rev. 761 (1967).

James A. Dobkin, The Release of Government-Owned Technical Data Under the Freedom ofInformation Law: Between Scylla and Charybdis, 14 Vill. L. Rev. 74 (1968).

Berrien C. Eaton, Jr. & Michael J. Lynch, Tax Practice as Affected by the Freedom of InformationAct and the Information Retrieval System, 17 Tul. Tax Inst. 405 (1967).

Note, The Federal Freedom of Information Act as an Aid to Discovery, 54 Iowa L. Rev. 141(1968).

Robert C. Fellmeth, The Freedom of Information Act and the Federal Trade Commission: AStudy in Malfeasance, 4 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 345 (1969).

B.L. Florsheim, Note, Aircraft Accident Investigation Records - Freedom of Information Act, 33 J.Air L. & Com. 490 (1967).

Comment, Freedom of Information Act: Access to Law, 36 Fordham L. Rev. 765 (1968).

Note, Freedom of Information: The Statute and the Regulations, 56 Geo. L.J. 18 (1967).

John K. Hoerster, Comment, 1966 Freedom of Information Act - Early Judicial Interpretations, 44Wash. L. Rev. 641 (1969).

Leo A. Huard, The 1966 Public Information Act: An Appraisal Without Enthusiasm, 2 Pub.Cont. L.J. 213 (1969).

Note, The Information Act: Judicial Enforcement of the Records Provision, 54 Va. L. Rev. 466(1968).

Robert S. Krauss & Francis M. Gregory, Jr., Note, Comments on Proposed Amendments to Sec-tion 3 of the Administrative Procedure Act: The Freedom of Information Bill, 40 Notre DameLaw. 417 (1965).

Joseph M. Mamana, FDA's Obligations Under the 1966 Public Information Act, 22 Food DrugCosm. L.J. 563 (1967).

- 494 -

Colloquy, Panel Discussions on Freedom of Information Act at Midyear Meeting, 20 ABA Sect. onTax. Bull., Apr. 1967, at 43.

Jack Paul, Access to Rules and Records of Federal Agencies: The Freedom of Information Act, 42L.A. Bar Bull. 459 (1967).

Symposium, Public Information Act and Interpretive and Advisory Rulings, 20 Admin. L. Rev. 1(1967).

Theodore M. Rowen, Recent Case, An Agency May Properly Refuse to Disclose Documents in itsPossession when not Properly Identified or Exempt Within the Act, Bristol Myers v. FTC, 38 U.Cin. L. Rev. 570 (1969).

Kenneth D. Salomon & Lawrence H. Wechsler, Note, The Freedom of Information Act: A Crit-ical Review, 38 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 150 (1969).

Frank S. Schmidt, Freedom of Information Act and the Internal Revenue Service, 20 So. Cal. TaxInst. 79 (1968).

Franklin M. Schultz, A Primer on the Public Information Act, 2 Pub. Cont. L.J. 208 (1969).

John J. Sexton, New Law Changes Rules on What Information IRS Must Disclose; ConfusionLikely, 26 J. Tax'n 120 (1967).

Recent Decision, Show Cause Order - Aircraft Accident Report, 34 J. Air L. & Com. 312 (1968).

Theodore Sky, Agency Implementation of the Freedom of Information Act, 20 Admin. L. Rev.445 (1968).

Jonathan Sobeloff, The New Freedom of Information Act: What it Means to Tax Practitioners, 27J. Tax'n 130 (1967). Charles E. Steward, Jr. & C. Daniel Ward, FTC Discovery: Depositions, the Freedom of Informa-tion Act and Confidential Informants, 37 ABA Antitrust L.J. 248 (1968).

Lester R. Uretz, Freedom of Information Act and the IRS, 20 Ark. L. Rev. 283 (1967).

Workshop on Practice and Procedure, 35 I.C.C. Prac. J. 969 (1968).

Frank M. Wozencraft, Freedom of Information Act - The First 36 Days, 20 Admin. L. Rev. 249(1968).

1970

Jeffrey B. Albert, Case Comment, Court May Permit Withholding of Information not Exemptedfrom Disclosure Under Freedom of Information Act: Consumers Union of United States, Inc. v.Veterans Administration, 5 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 121 (1970).

Project, Federal Administrative Law Developments - 1969, 1970 Duke L.J. 67.

Recent Case, File Classified "Top Secret" is Within National Security Exemption from the Act andIs not Obtainable Unless the Classification Is Arbitrary and Unreasonable, Epstein v. Resor, 83Harv. L. Rev. 928 (1970).

Morris D. Forkosch, Freedom of Information in the United States, 20 De Paul L. Rev. 1 (1970).

- 495 -

James M. Johnstone, The Freedom of Information Act and the FDA, 25 Food Drug Cosm. L.J. 296(1970).

Joan M. Katz, Games Bureaucrats Play: Hide and Seek Under the Freedom of Information Act, 48Tex. L. Rev. 1261 (1970).

Judith A. Mitnick, Note, Judicial Discretion and the Freedom of Information Act: DisclosureDenied: Consumers Union v. Veterans Administration, 45 Ind. L.J. 421 (1970).

Ralph Nader, Freedom from Information: The Act and the Agencies, 5 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 1(1970).

Symposium, Rights in Conflict - Reconciling Privacy with the Public's Right to Know, 63 L. Libr. J.551 (1970).

Anne L. Shiff, Note, The Use of Equitable Discretion to Modify the Act, 44 Tul. L. Rev. 800(1970).

1971

Secor D. Brown, The Freedom of Information Act and the CAB, 23 Admin. L. Rev. 137 (1971).

Douglas Colton, Note, The Doctrine of Executive Privilege Limits Statutory Access to InformationHeld Within the Executive Office of the President, Soucie v. DuBridge, 49 Tex. L. Rev. 780(1971).

Recent Development, Courts Must Order Agencies to Disclose Information Unless it Falls WithinSpecific Exemptions, Getman v. NLRB, 1971 U. Ill. L.F. 329.

Julius Epstein, Epstein v. Resor or the Emasculation of the Freedom of Information Act, 7 LincolnL. Rev. 82 (1971).

Project, Federal Administrative Law Developments - 1970, 1971 Duke L.J. 149.

Donald A. Giannella, Agency Procedures Implementing the Freedom of Information Act: A Pro-posal for Uniform Regulations, 23 Admin. L. Rev. 217 (1971).

Richard F. Johnson & Kay Marmorek, Access to Government Information and the ClassificationProcess - Is There a Right to Know?, 17 N.Y. L.F. 814 (1971).

Robert L. Saloschin, The Work of the Freedom of Information Committee of the Department ofJustice, 23 Admin. L. Rev. 147 (1971).

John T. Sherwood, Jr., Freedom of Information Act: A Compendium for the Military Lawyer, 52Mil. L. Rev. 103 (1971).

Richard B. Smith, The Freedom of Information Act and the Agencies: SEC No Action Letters, 23Admin. L. Rev. 133 (1971).

Harry H. Voight, Public Access to Intra-Agency Documents: The International Paper Case, 4Nat. Resources Law. 554 (1971).

John H. Warren III, Comment, Judicial Review, State Secrets, and the Freedom of InformationAct, 23 S.C. L. Rev. 332 (1971).

- 496 -

Frank M. Wozencraft, The Freedom of Information Act and the Agencies, 23 Admin. L. Rev. 129(1971).

1972

Roscoe Bryant, Comment, History and Background of Public Law 90-23, the Freedom of Informa-tion Act, 3 N.C. Cent. L.J. 193 (1972).

Alice M. Craft, The National Environmental Policy Act, the Freedom of Information Act and theAtomic Energy Commission: The Need for Environmental Information, 47 Ind. L.J. 755 (1972).

Recent Case, Department of Agriculture Must Disclose Detentions of Meat and Poultry Productsand Warning Letters Sent to Processors, Wellford v. Hardin, 85 Harv. L. Rev. 861 (1972).

Project, Developments Under the Freedom of Information Act - 1971, 1972 Duke L.J. 136.

John P. Flannery, Commercial Information Brokers, 4 Colum. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 203 (1972).

John A. Hoglund & Jonathan Kahan, Invasion of Privacy and the Freedom of Information Act:Getman v. NLRB, 40 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 527 (1972).

Frank Horton, The Public's Right to Know, 3 N.C. Cent. L.J. 123 (1972).

J. Stewart Hunter, Freedom of Information Act: An Appraisal, 1 Bureaucrat 131 (1972).

Note, Internal Memoranda that Contain Statements of Policy or Interpretations Adopted by anAgency May Be Subject to Disclosure, Sterling Drug, Inc. v. FTC, 50 Tex. L. Rev. 1006 (1972).

Note, Investigatory Files Remain Exempt from Public Disclosure even After Agency ProceedingsHave Terminated, SEC v. Frankel, 51 Tex. L. Rev. 119 (1972).

Charles H. Koch, Jr., The Freedom of Information Act: Suggestions for Making InformationAvailable to the Public, 32 Md. L. Rev. 189 (1972).

Luis Kutner, Freedom of Information: Due Process of the Right to Know, 18 Cath. Law. 50(1972).

Case Note, Letters of Warning and Detention Are Identifiable Records not Within InvestigatoryFiles Exemption, and Their Disclosure Is not a Violation of Due Process, 40 Fordham L. Rev. 921(1972).

Judith C. Martin & Jack R. Springgate, Protection of a Businessman's Proprietary Information, 32La. L. Rev. 497 (1972).

William R. Pendergast, The Responsibility of the FDA to Protect Trade Secrets and ConfidentialData, 27 Food Drug Cosm. L.J. 366 (1972).

The People's Right to Know, 8 Trial, Mar.-Apr. 1972, at 12.

Thomas R. Reid, III, Public Access to Internal Revenue Service Rulings, 41 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 23(1972).

Proctor D. Robison, Note, The Plain Meaning of the Freedom of Information Act: NLRB v.Getman, 47 Ind. L.J. 530 (1972).

- 497 -

George A. Taylor, Case Note, Investigatory Files Exemption - The Government May WithholdInvestigatory Materials Compiled for a Law Enforcement Proceeding Which Has Been Termina-ted, Frankel v. SEC, 4 St. Mary's L.J. 219 (1972).

Recent Case, Unclassified Documents Physically Connected with Classified Documents May notbe Withheld Under the National Security and Foreign Affairs Secrets Exemption, 25 Vand. L.Rev. 397 (1972).

Robert H. Wolfe, Recent Decision, Section 552(b)(7) of the Freedom of Information Act of 1970Precludes the Disclosure of Documents Compiled as Investigation Files and Used for Law Enforce-ment Purposes by a Federal Agency even when Enforcement Proceedings Have Been Terminated,Frankel v. SEC, 41 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 93 (1972).

Note, Writ of Mandamus Granted Requiring Pesticide Applicators' Reports Open to Public In-spection, 20 U. Kan. L. Rev. 525 (1972).

1973

Note, Access to Broadcasters' Financial Statements Filed with the FCC: The Freedom of Informa-tion Act Alternative, 42 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 145 (1973).

Frank Amoroso, The Freedom of Information Act: Shredding the Paper Curtain, 47 St. John's L.Rev. 694 (1973).

Martin R. Baach, Recent Case, Classification of Files Pursuant to Executive Order Is not Subjectto Judicial Review Under the Freedom of Information Act, EPA v. Mink, 42 U. Cin. L. Rev. 529(1973).

Carol Barker, Freedom of Information Act and its Declassification Procedures, 1 Gov't Publica-tions Rev. 147 (1973).

L. Douglas Brown, "On direction of my superiors, I respectfully decline...": The Fruitless Attemptto Subpoena Federal Records in Litigation not Involving the United States, 49 L.A. Bar Bull. 74(1973).

Project, Developments Under the Freedom of Information Act - 1972, 1973 Duke L.J. 178.

Recent Development, Enjoining Administrative Proceedings Pending a District Court Resolutionof a Demand for Information, Bannercraft Clothing Company, Inc. v. Renegotiation Board, 1973U. Ill. L.F. 180.

Note, The Freedom of Information Act and the Exemption for Intra-Agency Memoranda, 86Harv. L. Rev. 1047 (1973).

Michael J. Hannigan & Francis J. Nealon, Note, The Freedom of Information Act - The Parame-ters of the Exemptions, 62 Geo. L.J. 177 (1973).

Louise R. Malakoff, Comment, The First Amendment and the Public Right to Information, 35 U.Pitt. L. Rev. 93 (1973).

Steven E. Mayer, Note, The Freedom of Information Act: A Branch Across the Moat?, 22 DrakeL. Rev. 570 (1973).

W.G. Mitchell, Note, Needed - Freedom of Information, 52 N.C. L. Rev. 417 (1973).

- 498 -

James R. O'Neill, Comment, The Freedom of Information Act and its Internal Memoranda Ex-emption: Time for a Practical Approach, 27 Sw. L.J. 806 (1973).

Stuart I. Oran, Comment, Public Disclosure of Internal Revenue Service Private Letter Rulings, 40U. Chi. L. Rev. 832 (1973).

Marshall Patner et al., Public Access to Information, 68 Nw. U. L. Rev. 176 (1973).

Ronald L. Plesser, Freedom of Information Act: As Applied to Unclassified Documents, 1 Gov'tPublications Rev. 135 (1973).

Ronald L. Plesser, The Freedom of Information Act: What it Is & How to Use It, 31 NLADA 369(1973).

Recent Development, Private Letter Rulings Issued by the Internal Revenue Service Held Disclo-sable as Interpretations of the Law Adopted by the Agency, Tax Analysts & Advocates v. InternalRevenue Service, 7 Ind. L. Rev. 416 (1973).

Comment, Public Access to Government-Held Computerized Information, 68 Nw. U. L. Rev. 433(1973).

Recent Cases Reveal Which IRS Documents Taxpayers May Obtain Under the FIA, 39 J. Tax'n180 (1973).

Richard E. Rice, Recent Decision, In a Suit Under the Freedom of Information Act, Brought byGovernment Contractors Involved in Proceedings Before the Renegotiation Board, a DistrictCourt Has Jurisdiction to Issue an Injunction Pendente Lite to Stay the Board's Proceedings,Bannercraft Clothing Company, Inc. v. Renegotiation Board, 41 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1072 (1973).

Roger M. Rodwin, The Freedom of Information Act: Public Probing into (and) Private Produc-tion, 28 Food Drug Cosm. L.J. 533 (1973).

Donald C. Scriven, Note, Investigatory Files Exemption Remains Operative After Investigationand Law Enforcement Proceedings Concluded, 47 Tul. L. Rev. 1136 (1973).

Note, Stay of Agency Proceedings Pending Decision on Disclosure of Agency Documents, Banner-craft Clothing Co. v. Renegotiation Board, 51 Tex. L. Rev. 757 (1973).

Herbert L. Zuckerman, How Far Can Tax Men Go in Obtaining IRS Materials Under the FIA?, 39J. Tax'n 194 (1973).

1974

David W. Andich, Comment, The Freedom of Information Act, A Challenge to the Executive andthe Judiciary, 7 J. Mar. J. Prac. & Proc. 293 (1974).

Mac Asbill, Jr., Freedom of Information Act and the IRS, 26 So. Cal. Tax Inst. 1037 (1974).

Gene C. Bertsch, Note, Vaughn v. Rosen: Procedures and Proof Under the Freedom of Informa-tion Act, 35 U. Pitt. L. Rev. 850 (1974).

Mary A. Brauer, Note, Disclosure of IRS Private Letter Rulings, 1974 Wis. L. Rev. 227.

Turner Catledge et al., Survey, Government and the Freedom of Information, 20 Loy. L. Rev. 1(1974).

- 499 -

Recent Case, Commercial or Financial Information "Confidential" if Disclosure Would ImpairGovernment Access to Information or Harm Competitive Position of Informant, National Parksand Conservation Ass'n v. Morton, 88 Harv. L. Rev. 470 (1974).

Phyllis I. Crist, Note, The Freedom of Information Act and Equitable Discretion, 51 Denv. L.J.263 (1974).

Comment, Developments Under the Freedom of Information Act - 1973, 1974 Duke L.J. 251.

Recent Decision, Disclosure of Service Academy's Honor and Ethics Code Case Summaries withIdentifying Information Deleted Is Permissible Under Act, Rose v. Department of Air Force, 34Md. L. Rev. 429 (1974).

Comment, The "Investigatory Files" Exemption to the Freedom of Information Act, 1974 Wash.U. L.Q. 463.

Joseph Jacob, Some Reflections on Governmental Secrecy, 1974 Pub. L. 25.

James W. Johnson, Freedom of Information Act: Its Application in the Air Force, 16 A.F. L. Rev.54 (1974).

Joseph J. Kalo, Deterring Misuse of Confidential Government Information: A Proposed Citizens'Action, 72 Mich. L. Rev. 1577 (1974).

James S. Keller, Note, The Investigatory Files Exemption to the FOIA: The D.C. Circuit Aban-dons Bristol-Myers, 42 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 869 (1974).

Victor H. Kramer & David B. Weinberg, The Freedom of Information Act, 63 Geo. L.J. 49(1974).

B. Lazenby, Note, The Right to Information and the FOIA: Shredding the Paper Curtain of Se-crecy, 11 Hous. L. Rev. 717 (1974).

Ronald M. Levin, Comment, In Camera Inspection Under the Freedom of Information Act, 41 U.Chi. L. Rev. 557 (1974).

Ronald M. Mankoff, The Freedom of Information Act as a Taxpayer's Tool, 23 Tul. Tax Inst. 273(1974).

Sidney L. Matthew, Note, Government in the Sunshine: Judicial Application and Suggestions forReform, 2 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 537 (1974).

Patsy T. Mink, The Mink Case: Restoring the Freedom of Information Act, 2 Pepperdine L. Rev.8 (1974).

Paul R. Murphy, Amendments to the Freedom of Information Act, 1974/1975 Ann. Surv. Am. L.607.

Thomas A. Piraino, Jr., Note, Public Disclosure of Confidential Business Information Under theFreedom of Information Act: Toward a More Objective Standard, 60 Cornell L. Rev. 109 (1974).

Note, The Rights of the Public and the Press to Gather Information, 87 Harv. L. Rev. 1505(1974).

Bernard Samoff & Jeffrey C. Falkin, The Freedom of Information Act and the NLRB, 15 B.C. Ind.& Com. L. Rev. 1267 (1974).

- 500 -

Michael W. Sillyman, Comment, Response of the IRS to the Freedom of Information Act: AnUphill Battle for Disclosure, 1974 Ariz. St. L.J. 431.

Steven D. Symms & Paula M. Hawks, The Threads of Privacy: The Judicial Evolution of a "Rightto Privacy" and Current Legislative Trends, 11 Idaho L. Rev. 11 (1974).

Recent Case, Trial Court's Procedures Must Effectively Place Burden of Justification on AgencyDenying Request for Information, Vaughn v. Rosen, 87 Harv. L. Rev. 854 (1974).

Robert G. Vaughn, The Freedom of Information Act and Vaughn v. Rosen: Some Personal Com-ments, 23 Am. U. L. Rev. 865 (1974).

Comment, Vaughn v. Rosen: Toward True Freedom of Information, 122 U. Pa. L. Rev. 731(1974).

Richard H. Walker, Case Note, Vaughn v. Rosen: New Meaning for the Freedom of InformationAct, 47 Temp. L.Q. 390 (1974).

Gregory L. Waples, Note, The Freedom of Information Act: A Seven-Year Assessment, 74Colum. L. Rev. 895 (1974).

Peter P. Weidenbruch, Jr., Disclosure of Government Tax Information and Action, 27 Nat'l Tax J.395 (1974).

Robert E. Wisniewski, Note, Privacy, Public Interest and Judicial Equitable Discretion Within theFreedom of Information Act, Rose v. Department of the Air Force, 6 U. Tol. L. Rev. 215 (1974).

1975

Comment, Amendment of the Seventh Exemption Under the Freedom of Information Act, 16Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 697 (1975).

Waldo F. Bales, Comment, Public Business Is not Always Public, 7 Urb. Law. 332 (1975).

Ansley B. Barton, Comment, United States v. Nixon and the Freedom of Information Act: NewImpetus for Disclosure, 24 Emory L.J. 405 (1975).

Margaret A. Berger, How the Privilege for Governmental Information Met its Watergate, 25 CaseW. Res. L. Rev. 747 (1975).

Robert P. Bigelow, The Privacy Act of 1974, 21 Prac. Law., Sept. 1975, at 15.

Samuel H. Black, The Freedom of Information Act and the Internal Revenue Service, 33 NYUInst. Fed. Tax'n 683 (1975).

Samuel H. Black, The Tax Policymaking Process: Public Access and Judicial Review, 24 Tul. TaxInst. 227 (1975).

Gerard A. Bos, Note, Freedom of Information Act - Procedural Requirements Amended, 49 Tul.L. Rev. 678 (1975).

Elias Clark, Holding Government Accountable: The Amended Freedom of Information Act, 84Yale L.J. 741 (1975).

Thomas H. Clarke, Jr., Note, Restraint of Agency Proceedings Under the Freedom of InformationAct, 32 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 191 (1975).

- 501 -

James P. Donohue, Jr., Case Note, Renegotiation Procedures Will not Be Temporarily StayedWhile a Controversy over the Status of Documents Under the Information Act Is Settled, Re-negotiation Board v. Bannercraft Clothing Co., 3 Fordham Urb. L.J. 359 (1975).

Jeffrey S. Edelstein et al., Symposium, Openness in Government - A New Era, 34 Fed. B.J. 279(1975).

Larry P. Ellsworth, Amended Exemption 7 of the Freedom of Information Act, 25 Am. U. L. Rev.37 (1975).

Case Comment, FBI Retention of Criminal Identification Records: Tarlton v. Saxbe, 29 RutgersL. Rev. 151 (1975).

Donald B. Garvey, Prehearing Discovery in NLRB Proceedings, 26 Lab. L.J. 710 (1975).

Jo Anne Gazarek, Note, Would Macy's Tell Gimbel's: Government-Controlled Business Informa-tion and the Freedom of Information Act, Forwards and Backwards, 6 Loy. U. L.J. 594 (1975).

Stuart D. Goldberg & Robert W. Wien, Note, Facilitating Discovery in Civil Securities Actions:The 1975 Amendments to the Freedom of Information Act of 1966, 21 N.Y. L.F. 277 (1975).

Project, Government Information and the Rights of Citizens, 73 Mich. L. Rev. 971 (1975).

Morton Halperin, Judicial Review of National Security Classifications by the Executive BranchAfter the 1974 Amendments to the Freedom of Information Act, 25 Am. U. L. Rev. 27 (1975).

William R. Hayes, Case Note, SWAP Reports Are Specifically Exempt from Disclosure by StatuteBecause FAA Administrator Issued a Withholding Order Pursuant to Discretionary Authority,Administrator v. Robertson, 41 J. Air. L. & Com. 367 (1975).

Mary Hulett, Privacy and the Freedom of Information Act, 27 Admin. L. Rev. 275 (1975).

John S. Irving & Elinor H. Stillman, Interrelationship between the Freedom of Information Actand the National Labor Relations Act, 1975 Inst. on Lab. Law 181.

M. David Lacher, Note, The Freedom of Information Act Amendments of 1974: An Analysis, 26Syracuse L. Rev. 951 (1975).

Barry Larman, Case Note, Personal Information Exempted from Disclosure, Wine Hobby USA,Inc. v. IRS, 16 B.C. Ind. & Com. L. Rev. 240 (1975).

Jeffrey L. Levine, Statutory Comment, Judicial Review of Classified Documents: Amendments tothe Freedom of Information Act, 12 Harv. J. Legis. 415 (1975).

Marion K. Littman, Note, Research Designs Contained in Grant Applications, Washington Re-search Project, Inc. v. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, 17 B.C. Ind. & Com. L.Rev. 91 (1975).

Benny L. Kass, The New Freedom of Information Act, 61 A.B.A. J. 366 (1975).

Gary A. Manso, Disclosure Under the Freedom of Information Act - Rose v. Department of theAir Force, 49 St. John's L. Rev. 225 (1975).

Frederick P. McBrier, Note, The EPA's Proposed Rule for Freedom of Information Act Disclo-sures: A Model for Orderly Agency Determinations, 1975 Utah L. Rev. 943.

Robert H. McGinnis, Case Comment, The Expansion of Exemption Six, Wine Hobby USA, Inc. v.United States, 27 U. Fla. L. Rev. 848 (1975).

- 502 -

Jane L. McGrew, How to Let in the Sunshine Without Getting Burned: Protecting Your RightsBefore Advisory Committees, 30 Food Drug Cosm. L.J. 536 (1975).

Mary Ann McKinnon, Note, Tax Analysts and Advocates v. the Internal Revenue Service: Open-ing the Information Floodgates, 1975 Det. C.L. Rev. 145.

John F. Murphy, Knowledge is Power: Foreign Policy and Information Interchange Among Con-gress, the Executive Branch, and the Public, 49 Tul. L. Rev. 505 (1975).

Ralph Nader, New Opportunities for Open Government: The 1974 Amendments to the Freedomof Information Act and the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 25 Am. U. L. Rev. 1 (1975).

Comment, National Security and the Public's Right to Know: A New Role for the Courts Underthe Freedom of Information Act, 123 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1438 (1975).

Daniel F. O'Keefe, Jr., The FDA's Freedom of Information Act Regulations, 30 Food Drug Cosm.L.J. 312 (1975).

James T. O'Reilly, Government Disclosures of Private Secrets Under the Freedom of InformationAct, 30 Bus. Law. 1125 (1975).

Henry H. Perritt, Jr. & James A. Wilkinson, Open Advisory Committees and the Political Process:The Federal Advisory Committee Act After Two Years, 63 Geo. L.J. 725 (1975).

Ronald L. Plesser, The When and How of the Freedom of Information Act, 21 Prac. Law., Apr.1975, at 61.

Recent Decision, Private Letter Rulings Issued by the Internal Revenue Service to Taxpayers Arenot Exempt from Disclosure Under the Freedom of Information Act Although Internal RevenueService Technical Advice Memoranda Are so Exempt, Tax Analysts & Advocates v. IRS, 9 Ga. L.Rev. 499 (1975).

Alan Reitman, Freedom of Information and Privacy: The Civil Libertarian's Dilemma, 38 Am.Arch. 501 (1975).

Alfred P. Rubin, A Wholesome Discretion, 20 N.Y. L.F. 569 (1975).

Jeffrey A. Sar, Comment, The Federal Advisory Committee Act: A Key to Washington's BackDoor, 20 S.D. L. Rev. 380 (1975).

Irving Scher, Openness in Government: Protecting the Informant's Confidential InformationAgainst Discretionary Release, 34 Fed. B.J. 348 (1975).

Bruce S. Scolton, Note, Developments Under the Freedom of Information Act - 1974, 1975 DukeL.J. 416.

Barbara A. Silverman, Case Noted, Freedom of Information Act Requires Disclosure of IRS LetterRulings, 29 U. Miami L. Rev. 610 (1975).

Peter R. Spanos, Scope of Disclosure of Internal Revenue Communications and Information FilesUnder the Freedom of Information Act, 8 U. Mich. J.L. Ref. 329 (1975).

Allan J. Stein, FOIA and FACA: Freedom of Information in the "Fifth Branch?", 27 Admin. L.Rev. 31 (1975).

Note, Supreme Court Construes Freedom of Information Act Exemption of "matters that arespecifically exempted from disclosure by statute" to Permit Nondisclosure Under all Prior Non-disclosure Statutes, Administrator, FAA v. Robertson, 49 Temp. L.Q. 238 (1975).

- 503 -

Barbara W. Tuerkheimer, Veto by Neglect: The Federal Advisory Committee Act, 25 Am. U. L.Rev. 53 (1975).

Gilda M. Tuoni, NEPA and the Freedom of Information Act: A Prospect for Disclosure, 4 Envtl.Aff. 179 (1975).

Robert G. Vaughn, The Sanctions Provision of the Freedom of Information Act Amendments, 25Am. U. L. Rev. 7 (1975).

James H. Wallace, Jr., Proper Disclosure and Indecent Exposure: Protection of Trade Secrets andConfidential Commercial Information Supplied to the Government, 34 Fed. B.J. 295 (1975).

Meade Whitaker, Ruling Letters and Technical Advice: The Disclosure Crossroads, 53 Taxes 712(1975).

Meade Whitaker, Taxpayer Privacy v. Freedom of Information: Proposals to Amend Sec. 6103, 6Tax Adviser 198 (1975).

L. Hart Wright, Inadequacies of Freedom of Information Act as Applied to IRS Letter Rulings, 28Okla. L. Rev. 701 (1975).

1976

Greg Adams, Recent Development, Agency Secrecy Continues, NLRB v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.,Renegotiation Board v. Grumman Aircraft Engineering Corp., 52 Wash. L. Rev. 121 (1976).

Mark S. Adler, Comment, National Security Information Under the Amended Freedom of Infor-mation Act: Historical Perspectives and Analysis, 4 Hofstra L. Rev. 759 (1976).

Marc Arnold & Andrew Kisseloff, Note, An Introduction to the Federal Privacy Act of 1974 andits Effect on the Freedom of Information Act, 11 New Eng. L. Rev. 463 (1976).

Clifford K. Atkinson, Recent Development, Pre-FOIA Statutes Giving Federal Agencies Discre-tion in Withholding Agency Information Held Valid Under Exemption 3, Administrator, FederalAviation Administration v. Robertson, 16 Nat. Resources J. 1027 (1976).

Gene R. Beaty, Disclosure of the Air Force Human Factors Investigation, 42 J. Air. L. & Com. 385(1976).

Richard O. Berner, Note, The Effect of the 1976 Amendments to Exemption Three of the Free-dom of Information Act, 76 Colum. L. Rev. 1029 (1976).

Robert C. Betters, Case Comment, IRS Required to Make Available Documents Interpreting CodeSections, Subject to its Right to Propose Deletions for in Camera Review, Freuhauf Corporation v.IRS, 10 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 610 (1976).

James Beverage, Note, The Privacy Act of 1974: An Overview, 1976 Duke L.J. 301.

William J. Bowe, The Privacy Act of 1974: How it Affects Taxpayers, Practitioners and the IRS,45 J. Tax'n 74 (1976).

Jonathan Brant, A General Introduction to Privacy, 61 Mass. L.Q. 10 (1976).

Denise A. Bretting, Case Note, Under the Freedom of Information Act the CAB Must ReleaseForeign Air Transportation Certificate Decisions, Which Require Presidential Approval, as Soon

- 504 -

as They Are Submitted to the President, Aviation Consumer Action Project v. Civil AeronauticsBoard, 42 J. Air. L. & Com. 891 (1976).

David D. Drachsher, The Freedom of Information Act and the "Right" of Non-Disclosure, 28Admin. L. Rev. 1 (1976).

Hayward L. Draper, Statute, Privacy and Policy Intelligence Data Banks: A Proposal to Create aState Organized Intelligence System and to Regulate the Use of Criminal Intelligence Information,14 Harv. J. Legis. 1 (1976).

David M. Eisenberg, Note, Developments Under the Freedom of Information Act - 1975, 1976Duke L.J. 366.

Recent Decision, An Employer Charged With an Unfair Labor Practice Is not Entitled Under theFOIA to NLRB Files Compiled Pursuant to Investigation of the Charge when the EnforcementProceeding Is Pending, Title Guarantee Co. v. NLRB, 45 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 114 (1976).

Note, Executive Privilege and the Freedom of Information Act: The Constitutional Foundation ofthe Amended National Security Exemption, 1976 Wash. U. L.Q. 609.

Louis A. Fuselier & Armin J. Moeller, Jr., NLRB Investigatory Records: Disclosure Under theFreedom of Information Act, 10 U. Richmond L. Rev. 541 (1976).

James C. Goodale, Senate Bill No. 1 and the Freedom of Information Act: Do They Conflict?, 28Admin. L. Rev. 347 (1976).

James M. Gorski, Comment, Access to Information? Exemptions from Disclosure Under the Free-dom of Information Act and the Privacy Act of 1974, 13 Willamette L.J. 135 (1976).

Note, Governmental Investigations of the Exercise of First Amendment Rights: Citizens' Rightsand Remedies, 60 Minn. L. Rev. 1257 (1976).

Theodore C. Hake, Case Note, Abuse of Discretion - Agency Disclosure Under FOIA - AnyDisclosure of FOIA-Exempt Information Without Weighing Benefit to the Agency, Harm to thePublic and the Possibility of Compromise Is an Abuse of Discretion, Pennzoil Co. v. FPC, 8 St.Mary's L.J. 543 (1976).

Morton H. Halperin & David N. Hoffman, Secrecy and the Right to Know, 40 Law & Contemp.Prob. 132 (1976).

Jerome J. Hanus & Harold C. Relyea, A Policy Assessment of the Privacy Act of 1974, 25 Am. U.L. Rev. 555 (1976).

Donal F. Hartman, Jr., Comment, Departmental Executive Privilege: A Bar to Disclosure whenDealing with the IRS, 11 Gonz. L. Rev. 931 (1976).

Robert G. Holt, Comment, Open America v. Watergate Special Prosecution Force: Relief fromthe Strict Time Limits of the Freedom of Information Act, 1976 Utah L. Rev. 603.

Case Note, Information Concerning Grounds for Some Renegotiation Board Decisions Made Un-available, Renegotiation Board v. Grumman Aircraft Engineering Corp., 1976 B.Y.U. L. Rev. 269.

Peter H. Irons, Government Litigation Files as a Source of Legal History, 69 L. Libr. J. 503 (1976).

William J. Jordan et al., Note, The Freedom of Information Act - A Potential Alternative to Con-ventional Criminal Discovery, 14 Am. Crim. L. Rev. 73 (1976).

- 505 -

Alan M. Katz, Comment, Government Information Leaks and the First Amendment, 64 Calif. L.Rev. 108 (1976).

Kenneth A. Kovach, A Retrospective Look at the Privacy and Freedom of Information Acts, 27Lab. L.J. 548 (1976).

Gary I. Kruger, Comment, A Review of the Fourth Exemption of the Freedom of Information Act,9 Akron L. Rev. 673 (1976).

Richard L. Kuersteiner & Etta G. Herbach, Freedom of Information Act: An Examination of theCommercial or Financial Exemption, 16 Santa Clara L. Rev. 193 (1976).

Carolyn B. Kuhl, Note, Protection from Government Disclosure - The Reverse FOIA Suit, 1976Duke L.J. 330.

David B. Marblestone, The Coverage of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 35 Fed. B.J. 119(1976).

Jerry W. Markham, Sunshine on the Administrative Process: Wherein Lies the Shade?, 28Admin. L. Rev. 463 (1976).

Timothy J. McGonegle, Note, Backdooring the NLRB: Use and Abuse of the Amended FOIA forAdministrative Discovery, 8 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 145 (1976).

Arthur S. Miller & Henry B. Cox, On the Need for a National Commission on Documentary Ac-cess, 44 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 213 (1976).

Survey, NLRB Obligations Under the Freedom of Information Act: NLRB v. Sears, 17 B.C. Ind.& Com. L. Rev. 1114 (1976).

Note, National Security and the Amended Freedom of Information Act, 85 Yale L.J. 401 (1976).

Note, The Privacy Act of 1974: An Overview and Critique, 1976 Wash. U. L.Q. 667.

Recent Decision, The Processing of an Unexpected Deluge of FOIA Requests on a First-In, First-Out Basis, Except Where the Information Seeker Demonstrates Exceptional Need or Urgency, IsCompliance with the Freedom of Information Act, Open America v. Watergate Special Prosecu-tion Force, 11 Ga. L. Rev. 241 (1976).

Comment, Reverse-Freedom of Information Act Suits: Confidential Information in Search of Pro-tection, 70 Nw. U. L. Rev. 995 (1976).

Note, The Right to Disclosure of NLRB Documents Under the Freedom of Information Act, 5Fordham Urb. L.J. 119 (1976).

Sydney I. Roberts, Private Letter Rulings: Right to Privacy v. Right to Know, 4 Tax Notes 3(1976).

Howard Roffman, Comment, Freedom of Information: Judicial Review of Executive SecurityClassifications, 28 U. Fla. L. Rev. 551 (1976).

H. David Rosenbloom, More IRS Information May Become Public Due to Amended Freedom ofInformation Act, 45 J. Tax'n 258 (1976).

Frank A. Rosenfeld, Comment, The Freedom of Information Act's Privacy Exemption and thePrivacy Act of 1974, 11 Harv. C.R.-C.L. Rev. 596 (1976).

S. James Rosenfeld, The FOIA and the S.E.C.: The First Six Months, 4 Sec. Reg. L.J. 3 (1976).

- 506 -

Mark I. Steinberg, The 1974 Amendments to the Freedom of Information Act: The Safety ValveProvision § 552(a)(6)(C) Excusing Agency Compliance with Statutory Time Limits - A ProposedInterpretation, 52 Notre Dame Law. 235 (1976).

Susan T. Stephenson, Comment, Government in the Sunshine Act: Opening Federal AgencyMeetings, 26 Am. U. L. Rev. 154 (1976).

Earl G. Thompson, The Disclosure of Private Rulings, 59 Marq. L. Rev. 529 (1976).

Mark S. Wallace, Note, Discovery of Government Documents and the Official Information Priv-ilege, 76 Colum. L. Rev. 142 (1976).

Leon Wildes, The Nonpriority Program of the Immigration and Naturalization Service Goes Pub-lic: The Litigative Use of the Freedom of Information Act, 14 San Diego L. Rev. 42 (1976).

Anthony L. Young, Recent Developments Under FOIA and FACA Directly Affecting the Pharm-aceutical Industry, 31 Food Drug Cosm. L.J. 507 (1976).

1977

Maurice Baskin, Note, The Federal "Government in the Sunshine Act": A Public Access Com-promise, 29 U. Fla. L. Rev. 881 (1977).

Robert G. Belair, Agency Implementation of the Privacy Act and the Freedom of Information Act:Impact on the Government's Collection, Maintenance and Dissemination of Personally IdentifiableInformation, 10 J. Mar. J. Prac. & Proc. 465 (1977).

Robert R. Belair, Less Government Secrecy & More Personal Privacy? Experience with the Free-dom of Information and Privacy Acts, 4 Civ. Lib. Rev. 10 (1977).

Daniel G. Clement, The Rights of Submitters to Prevent Agency Disclosure of Confidential Busi-ness Information: The Reverse Freedom of Information Act Lawsuit, 55 Tex. L. Rev. 587 (1977).

Walter B. Connolly & John C. Fox, Employer Rights and Access to Documents Under the Free-dom of Information Act, 46 Fordham L. Rev. 203 (1977).

Michael P. Cox, A Walk Through Section 552 of the Administrative Procedure Act: The Free-dom of Information Act; The Privacy Act; and the Government in the Sunshine Act, 46 U. Cin.L. Rev. 969 (1977).

Note, Developments Under the Freedom of Information Act - 1976, 1977 Duke L.J. 532.

Del Dillingham, The Impact of the FOIA on NLRB Discovery Procedures, 10 U. Mich. J.L. Ref.476 (1977).

Timothy E. Furby, Comment, The Freedom of Information Act: A Survey of Litigation Under theExemptions, 48 Miss. L.J. 784 (1977).

Roger P. Gilson, Jr., Note, Administrative Disclosure of Private Business Records Under the Free-dom of Information Act: An Analysis of Alternative Methods of Review, 28 Syracuse L. Rev. 923(1977).

Note, The Government in the Sunshine Act - An Overview, 1977 Duke L.J. 565.

Robert J. Hausen, Recent Case, Exemption 7(A) Rejected as a Discovery Tool in NLRB Enforce-ment Proceeding, Title Guarantee Co. v. NLRB, 51 St. John's L. Rev. 251 (1977).

- 507 -

Eric L. Hirschhorn, Sunshine for Federal Agencies, 63 A.B.A. J. 55 (1977).

Jay Ikowitz, Note, The Title Guarantee Theory and Related Decisions: Are the Courts InterferingWith Exemption 7 of the FOIA?, 23 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 275 (1977).

David M. Ivester, The Constitutional Right to Know, 4 Hastings Const. L.Q. 109 (1977).

Richard H. Jones & William E. Findler, The Freedom of Information Act in Military AircrashCases, 43 J. Air L. & Comm. 535 (1977).

Stephen J. Kaczynski, Note, "Reversing" the Freedom of Information Act: Congressional Intentionor Judicial Invention?, 51 St. John's L. Rev. 734 (1977).

W. Alan Kailer, Note, The Release of Private Information Under Open Records Laws, 55 Tex. L.Rev. 911 (1977).

Stephen T. Landuyt, Comment, Disclosure and Individual Rights: Influencing the LegislativeProcess Under the Political Reform Act of 1974, 8 Pac. L.J. 939 (1977).

David B. Marblestone, The Relationship Between the Government in the Sunshine Act and theFederal Advisory Committee Act, 36 Fed. B.J. 65 (1977).

Robert Martin, Disclosure v. Privacy, Competing Goals Within the Context of the Freedom ofInformation Act, 13 Forum 142 (1977).

Louise H. McMurray, Note, The Freedom of Information Act: 1974 Amended Time ProvisionsInterpreted, 32 U. Miami L. Rev. 212 (1977).

Comment, Mead Data Central, Inc. v. United States Department of the Air Force: Extending theFOIA's Fifth Exemption, 19 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 343 (1977).

James Michael, Government Secrecy, 127 New L.J. 480 (1977).

Comment, Open America v. Watergate Special Prosecution Force: Judicial Revisions of FOIATime Limits, 71 Nw. U. L. Rev. 805 (1977).

Michele L. Oxman, Note, FOIA and Privacy Act Interface: Toward a Resolution of StatutoryConflict, 8 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 570 (1977).

Stuart M. Pape, Meetings and Correspondence, Including FOI Considerations, 32 Food DrugCosm. L.J. 226 (1977).

Thomas L. Patten & Kenneth W. Weinstein, Disclosure of Business Secrets Under the Freedom ofInformation Act: Suggested Limitations, 29 Admin. Law Rev. 193 (1977).

Robert W. Sloat, Statutory Comment, Government in the Sunshine Act: A Danger of Overexpo-sure, 14 Harv. J. Legis. 620 (1977).

Guy J. Sternal, Comment, Informational Privacy and Public Records, 8 Pac. L.J. 25 (1977).

Peter C. Ward, Address, Public's Access to Government - Freedom of Information, Privacy andSunshine Acts, 70 L. Libr. J. 509 (1977).

William J. Wiegmann, The Scope of the FOIA Exemptions and Reverse-FOIA Suits, 1977 Ann.Surv. Am. L. 1.

Carl Wilkerson, Reconciling the Conflicting Goals of the Right to Know and the Right to PrivacyUnder the Freedom of Information Act, 25 Chitty's L.J. 217 (1977).

- 508 -

Rex J. Zedalis, Comment, Resurrection of Reynolds: 1974 Amendment to National Defense andForeign Policy Exemption, 4 Pepperdine L. Rev. 81 (1977).

1978

Jean T. Adams, Note, Developments Under the Freedom of Information Act - 1977, 1978 DukeL.J. 189.

Gregory A. Akers, Note, Freedom of Information and the Individual's Right to Privacy: Depart-ment of the Air Force v. Rose, 14 Cal. W. L. Rev. 183 (1978).

Stanley E. Alderson, Recent Decision, The Export Administration Act of 1969 Does not ForecloseRelease Pursuant to Freedom of Information Act of Exporter Boycott Request Reports, 18 Va. J.Int'l L. 838 (1978).

Nancy D. Campbell, Reverse Freedom of Information Act Litigation: The Need for CongressionalAction, 67 Geo. L.J. 103 (1978).

Lucy J. Chandler, Case Note, Attorney Fees Under the Freedom of Information Act - CommercialInterest and in Propria Persona Appearances, 24 Wayne L. Rev. 1045 (1978).

Robert W. Coykendall, Note, In Camera Inspection of National Security Files Under the Freedomof Information Act, 26 Kan. L. Rev. 617 (1978).

Note, Disclosure of Union Authorization Cards Under the Freedom of Information Act - Interpre-ting the Personal Privacy Exemptions, 62 Minn. L. Rev. 949 (1978).

Peter F. Flaherty, The Freedom of Information Act and the Privacy Act of 1974: A Study in Con-flicts, 5 J. Legis. 26 (1978).

Gerald R. Ford, Rights in Collision, How Congress Created Serious Conflicts Between the Right ofPrivacy and the Right to Know, 7 Hum. Rts., Sept. 1978, at 10.

William F. Fox, Jr. & Peter N. Weiss, The FOIA National Security Exemption and the New Exec-utive Order, 37 Fed. B.J., Fall 1978, at 1.

Stephen D. Hall, Comment, What is a Record? Two Approaches to the Freedom of InformationAct's Threshold Requirement, 1978 B.Y.U. L. Rev. 408.

Shirley Z. Johnson, Treatment of Confidential Documents by the Federal Trade Commission, 46ABA Antitrust L.J. 1017 (1978).

Dave R. Kelleher, Note, Applying the Freedom of Information Act in the Area of Federal GrantLaw: Exploring an Unknown Entity, 27 Clev. St. L. Rev. 294 (1978).

Richard B. Kielbowicz, The Freedom of Information Act and Government's Corporate InformationFiles, 55 Journalism Q. 481 (1978).

Ronald A. Leahy, Four Keys to Information Disclosure, 29 Lab. L.J. 420 (1978).

Terrence G. Linderman, Freedom of Information - Animal Drug Regulations, 33 Food Drug Cosm.L.J. 274 (1978).

Susan H. Malone, Note, The Corporate Dilemma in "Reverse" FOIA Suits: Chrysler Corp. v.Schlesinger, 40 U. Pitt. L. Rev. 93 (1978).

- 509 -

Stephen Mayer, Privacy and the Social Security Number: Section 1211 of the Tax Reform Act of1976, 6 Rutgers J. Computers & L. 221 (1978).

David M. O'Brien, Privacy and the Right of Access: Purpose and Paradoxes of Information Con-trol, 30 Admin. L. Rev. 45 (1978).

Ruth D. Raisfeld, Note, NLRB Discovery After Robbins: More Peril for Private Litigants, 47Fordham L. Rev. 393 (1978).

James L. Russell, The Effect of the Privacy Act on Correction of Military Records, 79 Mil. L. Rev.135 (1978).

Sharyn L. Smith, Pro: In Support of the Public's Constitutional Right to Know. Daniel S. Dear-ing, Con: Public Access: A Quiet Shout from the Other Mob, 52 Fla. B.J. 617 (1978).

Martin J. Sobol, An Example of Judicial Legislation: The Third Circuit's Expansion of Exemption6 of the Freedom of Information Act to Include Union Authorization Cards, 23 Vill. L. Rev. 751(1978).

Douglas H. Walter, The Battle for Information: Strategies of Taxpayers and the IRS to Compel(or Resist) Disclosure, 56 Taxes 740 (1978).

Alan F. Westin, Privacy and Personnel Records: A Look at Employees Attitudes, 4 Civ. Lib. Rev.28 (1978).

1979

Note, "Agency Records" Under the Freedom of Information Act: An Analysis of Forsham v.Califano, 13 Ga. L. Rev. 1040 (1979).

Kevin R. Barry, Note, Chrysler Corp. v. Brown: Seeking a Formula for Responsible DisclosureUnder the FOIA, 29 Cath. U. L. Rev. 159 (1979).

James W. Brown, Disclosure of Business Secrets Under FOIA: A Business Perspective, 34 FoodDrug Cosm. L.J. 148 (1979).

Jeffrey S. Edelstein et al., Symposium, Openness in Government - A Continuing Era, 38 Fed. B.J.95 (1979).

Gregory B. English, Protecting the Stakeholder: Defense of the Government Agency's InterestsDuring Reverse FOIA Lawsuits, 31 Admin. L. Rev. 151 (1979).

Joseph Z. Fleming, Freedom of Information Act: An Important Discovery Aid in Labor Law Cases,53 Fla. B.J. 603 (1979).

Julia Y. George, Note, Chrysler Corp. v. Brown: Greater Protection for Corporate Secrecy, 13 Loy.L.A. L. Rev. 133 (1979).

Robert M. Halperin, Comment, FDA Disclosure of Safety and Effectiveness Data: A Legal andPolicy Analysis, 1979 Duke L.J. 286.

Steven F. Hehl, Note, Reverse FOIA Suits After Chrysler: A New Direction, 48 Fordham L. Rev.185 (1979).

Judith A. Johnson, Comment, Out of Reverse: Freedom of Information Act Litigation After Chry-sler Corp. v. Brown, 8 B.C. Envtl. Aff. L. Rev. 299 (1979).

- 510 -

Charles H. Koch, Jr. & Barry Rubin, A Proposal for a Comprehensive Restructuring of the PublicInformation System, 1979 Duke L.J. 1.

Lloyd F. LeRoy, Note, Foreign Nationals and Agencies of Foreign Governments as Persons Underthe Freedom of Information Act: A Question of Constitutionality, 12 Vand. J. of Trans. L. 335(1979).

William A. Moorman, Executive Privilege and the Freedom of Information Act: Sufficient Protec-tion for Aircraft Mishap Reports?, 21 A.F. L. Rev. 581 (1979).

Recent Decision, A Prior Decision on the Merits Permanently Enjoining Disclosure of Informationin a Reverse-FOIA Suit Does not Bar Relitigation in a Different Jurisdiction of the Propriety ofReleasing the Same Information, Consumers Union, Inc. v. Consumer Product Safety Commission,13 Ga. L. Rev. 1069 (1979).

Harold C. Relyea et al., Symposium, The Freedom of Information Act a Decade Later, 39 Pub. Ad.Rev. 310 (1979).

Theodore Roman, Jr., The Privacy Act and the Freedom of Information Act: Where Does GAOFit?, 14 GAO Rev. 22 (1979).

Robert N. Sayler & Mark Nozette, The Federal Library of Business, 5 Litigation, Spring 1979, at14.

Constance Y. Singleton & Howard O. Hunter, Statutory and Judicial Responses to the Problem ofAccess to Government Information, 1979 Det. C.L. Rev. 51.

John L. Snyder, Developments on Freedom of Information Act Reveal Trend Toward Greater Dis-closure, 50 J. Tax'n 48 (1979).

James M. Vache & Michael J. Makibe, Privacy in Government Records: Philosophical Perspec-tives and Proposals for Legislation, 14 Gonz. L. Rev. 515 (1979).

Richard W. Vitaris, Comment, Raw Research Data of Federal Grantee Held not To Be "AgencyRecords" Under the Freedom of Information Act, Forsham v. Califano, 10 Rut.-Cam. L.J. 711(1979).

Herbert M. Wachtell et al., Colloquy, Freedom of Information, Sunshine, and Privacy Laws: Im-pact on Business, 34 Bus. Law. 975 (1979).

Patricia P. Weaver, Note, Developments Under the Freedom of Information Act - 1978, 1979Duke L.J. 327.

R. Bradley Wilson & Jeffrey R. Zuckerman, Administrative Law - Developments Under the Free-dom of Information Act, 1979 Ann. Surv. Am. L. 361.

Anne H. Wion, Note, The Definition of "Agency Records" Under the Freedom of InformationAct, 31 Stan. L. Rev. 1093 (1979).

1980

James N. Benedict & Thomas N. O'Connor, The Need for Legislation in the Wake of ChryslerCorporation v. Brown, 4 Corp. L. Rev. 43 (1980).

Eileen J. Berkman, Note, The Reverse-FOIA Lawsuit: Routes to Nondisclosure After Chrysler, 46Brooklyn L. Rev. 269 (1980).

- 511 -

Lawrence W. Bigus, Comment, Administrative Investigation - Preventing Agency Disclosure ofConfidential Business Information, 28 U. Kan. L. Rev. 467 (1980).

Mark A. Borenstein, Yours for the Asking, 3 L.A. Law., Sept. 1980, at 42.

Ginny Conlan, Recent Case, The Freedom of Information Act Does not Afford a Private Cause ofAction to Enjoin Agency Disclosure of Exempt Information, but an Agency Has no Discretion toRelease Trade Secret Information Unless Specifically Authorized by Law, Chrysler Corp. v. Brown,49 U. Cin. L. Rev. 270 (1980).

Comment, The Consumer Product Safety Act as a Freedom of Information "Withholding" Statute,128 U. Pa. L. Rev. 1166 (1980).

Court Finds GCMS not Exempt Under FOIA, 52 J. Tax'n 117 (1980).

Diane H. Delekta, Note, Federal Open Market Committee of the Federal Reserve System v. Mer-rill: Delayed Disclosure to Protect Government Interests Under the Freedom of Information Act,1980 Det. C.L. Rev. 669.

Frank H. Easterbrook, Privacy and the Optimal Extent of Disclosure Under the Freedom of Infor-mation Act, 9 J. Legal Studies 775 (1980).

Mark Elengold, Freedom of Information Policy at the FDA, 35 Food Drug Cosm. L.J. 627 (1980).

James G. Fennessy, Rights in Conflict: The Second Circuit Struggles with the Freedom of Infor-mation Act, American Airlines, Inc. v. National Mediation Board, 46 Brooklyn L. Rev. 1017(1980).

Mark R. Filipp, Case Note, The Federal Administrative Procedure Act May Serve as a Basis forRelief in Reverse FOIA Actions, but FOIA Exemptions Are not Mandatory Bars to the Disclosureof Information, Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 57 U. Det. J. Urb. L. 445 (1980).

John W. Finger, Narrowing the "Routine Use" Exemption to the Privacy Act of 1974, 14 U. Mich.J.L. Ref. 126 (1980).

Rjean K. Formanek, The Proper Remedy for Nondisclosure of Information Submitted to Govern-mental Agencies Is Judicial Review of the Agency Decision to Disclose and not an IndependentAction Under the Freedom of Information Act, 13 Creighton L. Rev. 1108 (1980).

Freedom of Information Act: Threshold Definitional Barriers to Disclosure (Supreme Court, 1979Term), 94 Harv. L. Rev. 232 (1980).

Wilson W. Herndon, Discovery from the Government and the Freedom of Information Act, 31Federation Ins. Coun. Q. 31 (1980).

Note, The Impact of Restrictive Disclosure Provisions on Freedom of Information Act Requests:An Analysis of Section 6(b)(1) of the Consumer Product Safety Act, 64 Minn. L. Rev. 1021(1980).

Barbara J. Joseph, Note, Privacy Exemption - How Similar Is a "Similar File?", Pacific Molasses Co.v. NLRB Regional Office No. 15, 2 W. New Eng. L. Rev. 815 (1980).

Stephen Klein & Ann E. DeVine, The Freedom of Information Act: Reverse Litigation, 9 Colo.Law. 1119 (1980).

Roman J. Koropey, Recent Development, Exemption Five Includes a Qualified Privilege for Con-fidential Commercial Information, Federal Open Market Committee v. Merrill, 25 Vill. L. Rev.507 (1980).

- 512 -

Anthony T. Kronman, The Privacy Exemption to the Freedom of Information Act, 9 J. LegalStudies 727 (1980).

Michael J. Kump, A Model for Determining the Publication Requirements of Section 552(a)(1) ofthe Administrative Procedure Act, 13 U. Mich. J.L. Ref. 515 (1980).

Brian E. Lebowitz, Note, The Freedom of Nonfree Information: An Economic Proposal for Gov-ernment Disclosure of Privately Submitted Commercial Information, 32 Stan. L. Rev. 339 (1980).

David I. Levine, Using the Freedom of Information Act as a Discovery Device, 36 Bus. Law. 45(1980).

Paul L. Luedtke, Open Government and Military Justice, 87 Mil. L. Rev. 7 (1980).

Thomas J. Madden, The Application of the Freedom of Information Act to Contractor Records -Implication of Forsham v. Califano, 15 Pub. Cont. Newsl., July 1980, at 3.

Stephen S. Madsen, Note, Protecting Confidential Business Information from Federal Agency Dis-closure After Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 80 Colum. L. Rev. 109 (1980).

Kevin R. McCarthy & John W. Kornmeier, Maintaining the Confidentiality of Confidential Bus-iness Information Submitted to the Federal Government, 36 Bus. Law. 57 (1980).

Thomas O. McGarity & Sidney A. Shapiro, The Trade Secret Status of Health and Safety TestingInformation: Reforming Agency Disclosure Policies, 93 Harv. L. Rev. 837 (1980).

Daniel R. Modes, Comment, The Status of Law Enforcement Manuals Under the Freedom ofInformation Act, 75 Nw. U. L. Rev. 734 (1980).

Joseph G. Nassif, Voluntary Document Disclosure and the Freedom of Information Act, 36 J. Mo.B. 243 (1980).

Anthony C. Naughtin, Governmental Collection of Data and the Freedom of Information Act, 13Creighton L. Rev. 1150 (1980).

Michael M. Noonan, Recent Case, Kissinger v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press:The Supreme Court Denies FOIA Access to "Lost" Documents, 26 Loy. L. Rev. 706 (1980).

John A. Norris et al., Recent Decision, Medical Records, Communications and Information -Confidentiality - FOIA, Forsham v. Harris, 6 Am. J.L. & Med. 377 (1980).

Patrick Phillips, Are Trade Secrets Dead? The Effect of the Toxic Substances Control Act and theFreedom of Information Act on Trade Secrets, 62 J. Pat. Off. Soc'y 652 (1980).

Victor H. Polk, Jr., Comment, Publication Under the Freedom of Information Act of Statements ofGeneral Policy and Interpretations of General Applicability, 47 U. Chi. L. Rev. 351 (1980).

A Procedural Framework for the Disclosure of Business Records Under the Freedom of Informa-tion Act, 90 Yale L.J. 400 (1980).

Dennis J. Riley & Matthew S. Simchak, The Lingering Issues of Reverse FOIA Litigation: TheNeed for Definitive Legislative History to Accompany Recodification of 18 United States CodeSection 1905 in the Proposed Criminal Code Reform Act, 11 Pub. Cont. L.J. 426 (1980).

Laurence J. Shulman, Note, The Freedom of Information Act and Medicare Cost Reports, 6 Am.J.L. & Med. 543 (1980).

- 513 -

Jim Smith, The Freedom of Information Act of 1966: A Legislative History Analysis, 74 L. Libr. J.231 (1980).

John L. Snyder, Effects of the Recent FOIA Decision that IRS Must Publish its Internal Memoran-da, 52 J. Tax'n 332 (1980).

Russell B. Stevenson, Information and Rivalrous Competition, 48 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 671 (1980).

Angela M. Tomaselli, FOIA Exemption Seven: A Postamendment Interpretation, 14 Suffolk U. L.Rev. 202 (1980).

Michael H. Ubelaker, Note, Access to Grantee Records Under the Freedom of Information Act:An Analysis of Forsham v. Harris, 34 Sw. L.J. 993 (1980).

William H. Webster, An FBI Viewpoint Regarding the Freedom of Information Act, 7 J. Legis. 7(1980).

Pamela J. Wilson, Case Comment, Governmental Commercial and Precontractual InformationUnder Exemption 5 of the FOIA: Merrill v. FOMC, 60 B.U. L. Rev. 765 (1980).

Bill Winter, Mull FOIA Changes; Kissinger Papers Eyed, 66 A.B.A. J. 700 (1980).

Rowland L. Young, Freedom of Information ... Confidential Reports, 66 A.B.A. J. 1425 (1980).

Maynard L. Youngs, How to Handle a FOI Problem, 35 Food Drug Cosm. L.J. 668 (1980).

1981

Judith L. Adler, The Impact of FOIA on Scientific Research Grantees, 17 Colum. J.L. & Soc.Probs. 1 (1981).

Theodore T. Belazis, The Government's Commercial Information Privilege: Technical Informa-tion and FOIA's Exemption 5, 33 Admin. L. Rev. 415 (1981).

James N. Benedict & Thomas N. O'Connor, The Need for Legislation in the Wake of ChryslerCorporation v. Brown, 4 Corp. L. Rev. 43 (1981).

Lyn B. Boland, Comment, Pro se Litigant's Eligibility for Attorney Fees Under FOIA: Crooker v.United States Department of Justice, 55 St. John's L. Rev. 520 (1981).

John E. Bonine, Public Interest Fee Waivers Under the Freedom of Information Act, 1981 DukeL.J. 213.

Burt A. Braverman, Chrysler Corporation v. Brown: Protecting Business Secrets in the '80s, 4Corp. L. Rev. 23 (1981).

Burt A. Braverman & Wesley R. Heppler, A Practical Review of State Open Record Laws, 49 Geo.Wash. L. Rev. 720 (1981).

Michael H. Cardozo, The Federal Advisory Committee Act in Operation, 33 Admin. L. Rev. 1(1981).

Sylvia E. Castano, Note, Disclosure of Federal Officials' Documents Under the Freedom of Infor-mation Act: A Limited Application, 18 Hous. L. Rev. 641 (1981).

- 514 -

Sarah S. Clarkson, Case Comment, List of Names and Addresses of Unsuccessful Grant ApplicantsDo not Warrant Exemption Six Protection: Kurzon v. Department of Health and Human Serv-ices, 15 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 1009 (1981).

Mark Q. Connelly, Secrets and Smokescreens: A Legal and Ecomonic Analysis of GovernmentDisclosures of Business Data, 2 Wis. L. Rev. 207 (1981).

Phillip J. Cooper, Acquisition, Use and Dissemination of Information: A Consideration and Cri-tique of the Public Law Perspective, 33 Admin. L. Rev. 81 (1981).

Robert B. Cooper, Case Comment, Applying the Freedom of Information Act to Tax Return Infor-mation: Zale Corp. v. IRS, 69 Geo. L.J. 1283 (1981).

D.C. Circuit Holds that IRS Must Disclose Documents Under FOIA, 54 J. Tax'n 378 (1981).

First and Fifth Circuits Rule on FOIA Disclosures, 54 J. Tax'n 214 (1981).

Kathleen A. Frederick, Recent Development, Pro se Litigants Are not Eligible for an Award ofAttorney Fees, Cunningham v. FBI, 27 Vill. L. Rev. 1244 (1981-1982).

The Freedom of Information Act and General Counsel's Memoranda, Actions on Decision andTechnical Memoranda, 12 Tax Notes 43 (1981).

Note, FOIA Exemption 7 and Broader Disclosure of Unlawful FBI Investigations, 65 Minn. L. Rev.1139 (1981).

Michele B. Galen, Administrative Law, 1981 Ann. Surv. Am. L. 747.

Kevin W. Griffin, The Revitalization of Section 1905 of the Trade Secrets Act in Reverse Freedomof Information Act Suits, 16 New Eng. L. Rev. 831 (1981).

Mark Hannah, Case Note, No Improper Withholding if Records Are Removed from Agency Priorto Freedom of Information Act Request, Kissinger v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of Press,21 Santa Clara L. Rev. 1161 (1981).

Douglas A. Hastings, Professional Standards Review Organizations and Confidentiality: TheQuestion of Public Access to Medical Peer Review Data Through the Freedom of Information Act,6 J. Health Pol. & L. 136 (1981).

Kathryn Hormby, Public Interest Privilege: From Crown Privilege to FOIA, 23 Ariz. L. Rev. 1131(1981).

Michael J. Keefe, Recent Decision, FOIA Exemption Seven (C) Prevents Disclosure of Illegal Elec-tronic Surveillance Conducted Prior to the Enactment of Title III, 15 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 354(1981).

Edward M. Kennedy, Is the Pendulum Swinging Away from Freedom of Information?, 16 Harv.C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 311 (1981).

J. Stephen King, The Freedom of Information Act: Making a Request and Litigating its Refusal,44 Tex. B.J. 540 (1981).

Meri W. Maffet, Note, Open Secrets: Protecting the Identity of the CIA's Intelligence Gatherersin a First Amendment Society, 32 Hastings L.J. 1723 (1981).

James E. Merritt, The Use of the Freedom of Information Act in Federal Tax Matters, 39 NYUInst. Fed. Tax'n 38 (1981).

- 515 -

Robert W. Metzler, Zale Corporation v. Internal Revenue Service: Turmoil in the DisclosureScheme for Tax Return Information, 30 Cath. U. L. Rev. 675 (1981).

J. Denny Moffett, Federal Tax Representation and the Freedom of Information Act, 52 Okla. B.J.1797 (1981).

James J. Murphy, Amending the Freedom of Information Act, 37 J. Mo. B. 343 (1981).

Obtaining Fee Waivers or Reductions for Information Requested Under the Freedom of Informa-tion Act, 15 Clearinghouse Rev. 265 (1981).

Oliver B. Pollak, The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and Exemptions from Disclosure, 14Creighton L. Rev. 976 (1981).

Steven P. Schubiner, Case Note, Agency Under no Duty to Retrieve Wrongfully Removed Rec-ords, Kissinger v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, 27 Wayne L. Rev. 1315 (1981).

Martin J. Silverman, Comment, Agency Records - Forsham v. Harris, 27 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 635(1981).

Landon P. Snell III, Comment, Exemption 7(C) of the Freedom of Information Act (1974): ItsLegislative History and a Case Analysis, 22 A.F. L. Rev. 390 (1981).

Stuart M. Statler, Let the Sunshine In?, 67 A.B.A. J. 573 (1981).

Byron Swift, Interpretive Rules and the Legal Opinions of Government Attorneys, 33 Admin. L.Rev. 425 (1981).

Wm. Douglas Taylor, The Chrysler v. Brown Standard: Public Disclosure of Health Services' CostReports, 83 W. Va. L. Rev. 638 (1981).

Janice Toran, Information Disclosure in Civil Actions: The Freedom of Information Act and theFederal Discovery Rules, 49 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 843 (1981).

Cathy S. Travis, Case Note, Canal Authority of Florida v. Froehlke, The Freedom of InformationAct Exemptions Provide no Bar to Discovery, 11 Envtl. L.J. 435 (1981).

Patrick J. Ward, Comment, The Vaughn Index - Enforcing Agency Compliance Under the Free-dom of Information Act: Coastal States Gas Corp. v. DOE, 16 New Eng. L. Rev. 979 (1981).

Bruce L. Watson, Disclosure of Computerized Health Care Information: Provider Privacy RightsUnder Supply Side Competition, 7 Am. J.L. & Med. 265 (1981).

What Information Can Federal Agencies Bottle Up? Anything that Would Harm LegitimateFunctions, 38 Bench & B. Minn., Sept. 1981, at 54.

John W. Williams, Discovery and the Privacy Act: Exemption (b)(11) to the Conditions of Dis-closure: What Qualifies as an "Order of the Court?", 15 U. Rich. L. Rev. 439 (1981).

Anne H. Wright, Note, The Definition of "Agency" Under the Freedom of Information Act as Ap-plied to Federal Consultants and Grantees, 69 Geo. L.J. 1223 (1981).

Charles R. Wunsch, Trade Secret Confidentiality and Toxic Substances Regulations: A Non-Tariff Trade Barrier in the Chemical Trade, 14 Cornell Int'l L.J. 173 (1981).

Richard W. Young, Note, Constitutional Limitations on Government Disclosure of Private TradeSecret Information, 56 Ind. L.J. 347 (1981).

- 516 -

1982

Allan Ashman, Freedom of Information ... Let the Sunshine In, 68 A.B.A. J. 207 (1982).

Marnie J. Carro, Note, Crooker v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms: A Result-OrientedApproach to FOIA Exemption 2, 32 Cath. U. L. Rev. 317 (1982).

Laura A. Chip, Note, Exemption 2 of FOIA Protects Law Enforcement Manuals from Disclosure:Crooker v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms, 12 Seton Hall L. Rev. 896 (1982).

Patrick E. Cole, The Freedom of Information Act and the Central Intelligence Agency's PaperChase: A Need for Congressional Action to Maintain Essential Secrecy for Intelligence FilesWhile Preserving the Public's Right to Know, 58 Notre Dame L. Rev. 350 (1982).

Compromise on FOI Legislation Reported, 6 News Media & L., June-July 1982, at 21.

Myron L. Dale, Freedom of Information Act: Lawyers Discover a New Discovery Tool, 18 Trial,Aug. 1982, at 36.

Alfonse M. D'Amato & Antonia M. Greenman, The Freedom of Information Act and the CIA:How S. 1235 Will Enhance Our Nation's Security, 9 J. Legis. 179 (1982).

Mark E. Dennett, Comment, Protecting the FBI's Informants, 19 Harv. J. on Legis. 393 (1982).

FOIA Does not Cover Rev. Ruls. of Background Notes, 57 J. Tax. 71 (1982).

Freedom of Information Act Shields Justice Dep't Attorneys' Memos from Disclosure, 56 J. Tax'n125 (1982).

Roy S. Gordet, Comment, The Disclosure and Reproduction of Copyrighted Agency RecordsUnder the Freedom of Information Act, 22 Santa Clara L. Rev. 513 (1982).

David Harris, FOIA: No Government, Liberal or Conservative, Would Like this Law, 6 Update,Spring 1982, at 28.

William Higgs, Reverse-FOIA Litigation, 39 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 445 (1982).

Ronald I. Keller, Note, The Applicability and Scope of the Attorney-Client Privilege in the Exec-utive Branch of the Federal Government, 62 B.U. L. Rev. 1003 (1982).

Don Lively, Catch 7(A): The Plaintiff's Burden Under the Freedom of Information Act, 28 Vill. L.Rev. 75 (1982-1983).

F.L. McChesney, Comment, Nuclear Weapons and "Secret" Impact Statements: High Court Ap-plies FOIA Exemptions to EIS Disclosure Rules, 12 Envtl. L. Rep. 1007 (1982).

James T. O'Reilly, Regaining a Confidence: Protection of Business Confidential Data ThroughReform of the Freedom of Information Act, 34 Admin. L. Rev. 263 (1982).

Renee G. Rabinowitz, Note, The Applicability of the Freedom of Information Act's Disclosure Re-quirements to Intellectual Property, 57 Notre Dame Law. 561 (Feb. 1982).

Aaron I. Reichel, Reagan Administration's Position on FOIA Is Misinterpreted, 110 N.J. L.J., Nov.4, 1982, at 1.

Lawrence A. Silver, Reverse Freedom of Information Act Litigation in a Non-Commercial Setting:The Case of Professor Doe, 31 Clev. St. L. Rev. 455 (1982).

- 517 -

John B. Smith, Comment, Public Access to Information Privately Submitted to GovernmentAgencies: Balancing the Needs of Regulated Businesses and the Public, 57 Wash. L. Rev. 331(1982).

David L. Sobel, The Freedom of Information Act: A Case Against Amendment, 8 J. Contemp. L.47 (1982).

Russell B. Stevenson, Information and Rivalrous Competition, 23 Corp. Prac. Comment. 545(1982).

Russell B. Stevenson, Jr., Protecting Business Secrets Under the Freedom of Information Act:Managing Exemption 4, 34 Admin. L. Rev. 207 (1982).

Thomas M. Susman et al., Seminar, Your Business, Your Trade Secrets, and Your Government: ASeminar on Protecting and Obtaining Commercial Information from the Government, 34 Admin.L. Rev. 107 (1982).

Richard A. Vance, Comment, Discovery of Government Attorney Work Product Under theFOIA: Grolier, Inc. v. FTC, 71 Ky. L.J. 919 (1982-1983).

William L. Van Lenten, The Freedom of Information Act: What it Is and How it Affects the BankBoard, 15 Fed. Home Loan Bank Board J. 10 (1982).

Dexter R. Woods, Jr., Comment, Governmental Disclosure of Confidential Business InformationUnder the Freedom of Information Act: Litigation and Proposed Legislation After Chrysler Corp.v. Brown, 9 Ohio N.U. L. Rev. 465 (1982).

Rowland L. Young, Freedom of Information ... Census Records, 68 A.B.A. J. 478 (1982).

Rowland L. Young, Freedom of Information ... Right of Privacy, 68 A.B.A. J. 850 (1982).

1983

Burt A. Braverman & Frances J. Chetwynd, Court Narrows Exemption 4 Trade Secret Definition,Legal Times, June 6, 1983, at 21.

Timothy W. Collier, Case Note, Freedom of Information Act - Investigatory Records Exemption -Summarized or Reproduced Information Retains Exemption, 29 Wayne L. Rev. 1269 (1983).

Ian C. Crawford, Case Note, FBI v. Abramson and the FOIA: Exemption Seven Shields PoliticalRecords, 17 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 748 (1983).

Richard C. Ehlke & Harold C. Relyea, The Reagan Administration Order on Security Classifica-tion: A Critical Assessment, 30 Fed. B. News & J. 91 (1983).

Eugene Ferguson, Jr., Comment, The Freedom of Information Act: A Time for Change?, 1983Det. C.L. Rev. 171.

Orrin G. Hatch, Balancing Freedom of Information with Confidentiality for Law Enforcement, 9 J.Contemp. L. 1 (1983).

Orrin G. Hatch, Refinements Are Needed to Stop Abuses, 69 A.B.A. J. 556 (1983).

Nanette Hillman, Recent Decision, Freedom of Information Act: Absent its Adoption as an Ex-pression of Agency Law, an IRS Document Entitled Draft Technical Memorandum is a Delibera-

- 518 -

tive, Predecisional Document Exempt from the Public Disclosure Required by the FOIA: King v.IRS, 71 Ill. B.J. 674 (1983).

Cordell A. Johnston, Case Comment, Greentree v. United States Customs Service: A Misinterpre-tation of the Relationship Between FOIA Exemption 3 and the Privacy Act, 63 B.U. L. Rev. 507(1983).

John F. Joyce, The Privacy Act: A Sword and a Shield but Sometimes Neither, 99 Mil. L. Rev.113 (1983).

Steven J. Lepper, Note, Developments Under the Freedom of Information Act - 1982, 1983 DukeL.J. 390.

Roshon L. Magnus, Comment, Judicial Erosion of the Standard of Public Disclosure of Investiga-tory Records Under the FOIA After FBI v. Abramson, 26 How. L.J. 1614 (1983).

Alan B. Morrison, Don't Fix What Isn't Broken, 69 A.B.A. J. 557 (1983).

Colloquy, National Security, Law Enforcement and Business Secrets Under the Freedom of Infor-mation Act, 38 Bus. Law. 707 (1983).

Gerald F. O'Connell Jr., Recent Case, An Agency's Unpublished Time of Request Cutoff Date forSearching its Files for Records Requested Under the Freedom of Information Act Is Invalid as Un-reasonable Unless Exceptional Circumstances Are Shown; All Records in an Agency's PossessionWhether Created by the Agency Itself or by Another Agency Are "Agency Records": McGehee v.Central Intelligence Agency, 52 U. Cin. L. Rev. 921 (1983).

James T. O'Reilly, Who's on First? The Role of the Office of Management and Budget in FederalInformation Policy, 10 J. Legis. 95 (1983).

Glen O. Robinson, Seminar, Access to Government Information: The American Experience, 14Fed. L. Rev. 35 (1983).

Andrew R. Schein, Note, Attorney Fees for pro se Plaintiffs Under the Freedom of Informationand Privacy Acts, 63 B.U. L. Rev. 443 (1983).

Cathy Seibel, Note, Fee Awards for pro se Attorney and Nonattorney Plaintiffs Under the Free-dom of Information Act, 52 Fordham L. Rev. 374 (1983).

Ira C. Selkowitz, Commentary, Well Kept Secret: Informal Adjudication in the Copyright Office -A Freedom of Information Act Violation?, 35 Admin. L. Rev. 133 (1983).

Jeffrey M. Sellers, Note, Public Enforcement of the Freedom of Information Act, 2 Yale L. & Pol'yRev. 78 (1983).

Michael A. Stroud, Note, Law Enforcement Exemption May Prevent Disclosure of Records notCompiled for Law Enforcement Purposes, 57 Tul. L. Rev. 1564 (1983).

Vicki Waitsman, Note, Privacy Act Exemption (j)(2) Does not Specifically Preclude Disclosure ofInformation Within Meaning of Exemption 3 of the Freedom of Information Act: Greentree v.United States Customs Service, 56 Temp. L.Q. 127 (1983).

Rowland L. Young, FOIA Exemption Protects FTC Attorney's Work Product, 69 A.B.A. J. 1134(1983).

- 519 -

1984

Burt A. Braverman & Frances J. Chetwynd, Submitters Beware: The Perils of FOIA-Implemen-ting Regulations, 12 AIPLA Q.J. 33 (1984).

Gregory G. Brooker, Note, FOIA Exemption 3 and the CIA: An Approach to End the Confusionand Controversy, 68 Minn. L. Rev. 1231 (1984).

William L. Casey, Jr. et al., The Economic Impact of the Freedom of Information Act, 12 AIPLAQ.J. 76 (1984).

Mary M. Cheh, Judicial Supervision of Executive Secrecy: Rethinking Freedom of Expression forGovernment Employees and the Public Right of Access to Government Information, 69 Cornell L.Rev. 690 (1984).

James A. Dobkin & James X. Dempsey, Protection of Corporate Secrets in Government ContractProposals and Bids, 15 Pub. Cont. L.J. 46 (1984).

Kevin C. Dwyer & Peter G. Rush, Note, Developments Under the Freedom of Information Act -1983, 1984 Duke L.J. 377.

Scott A. Faust, Note, National Security Information Disclosure Under The FOIA: The Need ForEffective Judicial Enforcement, 25 B.C. L. Rev. 611 (1984).

Federal-State FOI Acts, 8 News Media & L., Jan.-Feb. 1984, at 14.

Steven W. Feldman, The Government's Commercial Data Privilege Under Exemption 5 of theFreedom of Information Act, 105 Mil. L. Rev. 125 (1984).

David H. Flaherty, The Need for an American Privacy Protection Commission, 1 Gov't Informa-tion Q. 235 (1984).

Jon L. Fleischaker & Kimberly K. Greene, Incursions on Access: "Privacy" Versus the FirstAmendment, 15 U. Tol. L. Rev. 641 (1984).

John M. Graham, Note, Fair Administration of the Freedom of Information Act After the Com-puter Revolution, 5 Computer L.J. 51 (1984).

Michael Hirschfeld, Right of Access to Internal Revenue Service Files, 15 U. Tol. L. Rev. 659(1984).

David Jacoby, The Uses of FOIA and FOIL, 16 Trial Law. Q. 12 (1984).

Paul Lansing, The Conflict of Patient Privacy and the Freedom of Information Act, 9 J. HealthPol. Pol'y & L. 315 (1984).

Frederick Z. Lodge, Note, Damages Under the Privacy Act of 1974: Compensation and Deter-rence, 52 Fordham L. Rev. 611 (1984).

Susan Marble, Note, Is the Privacy Act an Exemption 3 Statute and Whose Statute Is it Anyway?,52 Fordham L. Rev. 1334 (1984).

James T. O'Reilly, Trade Secrets: Asleep At The Switch?, 12 AIPLA Q.J. 13 (1984).

Thomas M. Susman, Privacy Act Versus FOIA: A Battle on Many Fronts, 9 Admin. L. News,Spring 1984, at 2.

- 520 -

Edward A. Tomlinson, Use of the Freedom of Information Act for Discovery Purposes, 43 Md. L.Rev. 119 (1984).

Robert G. Vaughn, Administrative Alternatives and the Federal Freedom of Information Act, 45Ohio St. L.J. 185 (1984).

Prospere S. Virden, Jr. & Nancy A. Sutherland, Releasability Under the Freedom of InformationAct of Documents Submitted by Government Contractors, 12 AIPLA Q.J. 50 (1984).

Patricia M. Wald, The Freedom of Information Act: A Short Case Study in the Perils and Pay-backs of Legislating Democratic Values, 33 Emory L.J. 649 (1984).

1985

Patricia L. Agliano, Long v. Internal Revenue Service: A Miscalculation of the Freedom of Infor-mation Act's Applicability to Section 6103(b) of the Internal Revenue Code, 5 Va. Tax Rev. 441(1985).

Judith A. Bigelow, Comment, Meeting the Agency Burden Under the Confidential Source Exemp-tion to the Freedom of Information Act, 60 Wash. L. Rev. 873 (1985).

Janet A. Bradley, Pro se Complainants and the Freedom of Information Act: Neglected, not Re-jected, 37 Admin. L. Rev. 15 (1985).

Contra Aid Files Unsealed: Judge Rules Administration Acknowledged Covert Aid Publicly, Dis-closure Couldn't Harm National Security, 9 News Media & L., Summer 1985, at 35.

Karen Czapanskiy, Comment, Time Limits Under The Freedom of Information Act: AnotherProblematic New Property Reform, 44 Md. L. Rev. 38 (1985).

Gregory J. Degulis, Note, Information Disclosure and Competent Authority: A Proposal, 17 CaseW. Res. J. Int'l L. 485 (1985).

Richard Ehlke, The Privacy Act After a Decade, 18 J. Mar. L. Rev. 829 (1985).

Freedom of Information Act: CIA Can Keep Secret Almost Anything; FOIA Proposals Reintro-duced in Congress; Privacy Exemption Can Be Overcome; Legislative Records on Line, but Cost IsHigh, 9 News Media & L., Spring 1985, at 30.

Emily E. Garrard, Death Certificates Are not Exempt from Disclosure Requirements of the Free-dom of Information Act, 37 S.C. L. Rev. 1 (1985).

Bonnie L. Gay, Litigators' Guide to Using Government Sources and the Freedom of InformationAct, 15 Brief, Fall 1985, at 52.

Patti Goldman, Combatting the Opposition: English and United States Restrictions on the PublicRight of Access to Governmental Information, 8 Hastings Int'l & Comp. L. Rev. 249 (1985).

Laura Hawkins, Case Note, The Privacy Act as Partial Repeal of the Freedom of Information Act,10 T. Marshall L.J. 429 (1985).

Beverly Horn, Efforts Continue to Restrict FOIA, 10 Litigation News, Winter 1985, at 7.

Michael H. Hughes, Note, CIA v. Sims: Supreme Court Deference to Agency Interpretation ofFOIA Exemption 3, 35 Cath. U. L. Rev. 279 (1985).

- 521 -

Susan L. Keilitz, Note, Attorney Fees, Freedom of Information and pro se Litigants: Per se Prohi-bitions Frustrate Policies, 26 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 349 (1985).

Linda A. Krupicka & Mary E. LaFrance, Note, Developments Under the Freedom of InformationAct - 1984, 1985 Duke L.J. 742.

Angus Mackenzie, Who Wants to Know? Businesses Are Pushing for FOIA Reform so They'llKnow Who is Getting Their Records from the Government, 5 Cal. Law., Apr. 1985, at 38.

Kimera Maxwell & Roger Reinsch, Freedom of Information Act Privacy Exemption: Who Does itReally Protect?, 7 Com. & L., Apr. 1985, at 45.

Lisa A. Mednick, Note, Awarding Fees to the Self-Represented Attorney Under the Freedom ofInformation Act, 53 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 291 (1985).

John Moon, The Freedom of Information Act: A Fundamental Contradiction, 34 Am. U. L. Rev.1157 (1985).

NRC Meeting Secrecy Examined: Congress, Court Criticize Agency for Failure to Comply withSunshine Act, FOI Act, 9 News Media & L., Summer 1985, at 32.

Marie V. O'Connell, Note, A Control Test for Determining "Agency Record" Status Under theFreedom of Information Act, 85 Colum. L. Rev. 611 (1985).

Pentagon Creates "Classification" System: Critics Say New Technical Data Procedure Will Need-lessly Delay FOI Act Requests, 9 News Media & L., Summer 1985, at 38.

Vivian M. Raby, Comment, The Freedom of Information Act and the IRS Confidentiality Statute:A Proper Analysis, 54 U. Cin. L. Rev. 605 (1985).

Marc Shore, Comment, United States v. Weber Aircraft Corporation, Exemption Five of the Free-dom of Information Act in Military Aircrash Cases, 17 U. West L.A. L. Rev. 155 (1985).

Jacques A. Soiret, The Freedom of Information Act: A Viable Alternative to the Federal Rules?,29 Trial Law. Guide 484 (1985).

Larry W. Thomas, The Courts and the Implementation of the Government in the Sunshine Act,37 Admin. L. Rev. 259 (1985).

George B. Trubow, Information Law Overview, 18 J. Mar. L. Rev. 815 (1985).

1986

Lisa A. Albinger, Personal Information in Government Agency Records: Toward an InformationalRight to Privacy, 1986 Ann. Surv. Am. L. 625.

Christopher Dunn, Judging Secrets, 31 Vill. L. Rev. 471 (1986).

Brent Filbert, Case Note, Freedom of Information Act: CIA v. Sims - CIA Is Given Broad Powersto Withhold the Identities of Intelligence Sources, 54 U.M.K.C. L. Rev. 332 (1986).

James A. Goldston et al., Comment, A Nation Less Secure: Diminished Public Access to Informa-tion, 21 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 409 (1986).

Lawrence J. Goode & Douglas R. Williams, Note, Developments Under the Freedom of Informa-tion Act - 1985, 1986 Duke L.J. 384.

- 522 -

Susan S. Hayes, Comment, The Freedom of Information Act in Air Crash Discovery: Friend orFoe?, 52 J. Air L. & Com. 479 (1986).

Mark Jordan, Comment, Freedom of Information Act: CIA's Right to Nondisclosure Broadenedby Liberal Definition of Intelligence Source, CIA v. Sims, 25 Washburn L.J. 586 (1986).

Kevin J. Mulry, Comment, Access to Trial Exhibits in Civil Suits: In re Reporters Committee forFreedom of the Press, 60 St. John's L. Rev. 358 (1986).

James T. O'Reilly, Advisors and Secrets: The Role of Agency Confidentiality in the Federal Advi-sory Committee Act, 13 N. Ky. L. Rev. 27 (1986).

Steven M. Post, The Freedom of Information Act and the Commercial Activities Program, ArmyLaw., May 1986, at 9.

Thomas P. Ruane, Federal Information Disclosure Laws: Their Potential Utilization by the Lou-isiana Legislature to Procure Information from the Federal Government, 12 S.U. L. Rev. 111(1986).

Thomas M. Susman, Risky Business: Protecting Government Contract Information Under theFreedom of Information Act, 16 Pub. Cont. L.J. 15 (1986).

Ellen Waldman, Privacy Versus Open Government: Section 7(C) Exemption of the Freedom ofInformation Act, 1986 Ann. Surv. Am. L. 609.

1987

Susan L. Beesley & Theresa A. Glover, Note, Developments Under the Freedom of InformationAct - 1986, 1987 Duke L.J. 521.

Mark E. DeFrank, Taxpayer's Request for Disclosure of Return Information is Governed by theFreedom of Information Act Rather than the Internal Revenue Code: Grasso v. Internal RevenueService (1986), 32 Vill. L. Rev. 721 (1987).

Elena M. Gervino, Note, The Internal Revenue Code: Interpreting the "Haskell Amendment" to26 U.S.C. § 6103 - Defining "Return Information," 9 W. New Eng. L. Rev. 269 (1987).

Jeffrey R. Godley, Note, Defining the CIA's "Intelligence Sources" as an Exemption to the Freedomof Information Act - CIA v. Sims, 9 W. New Eng. L. Rev. 333 (1987).

Stephen K. Huber, Mandatory Disclosure of Information About Banks, 6 Ann. Rev. of Banking L.53 (1987).

Mark W. Iannotta, Comment, Protecting Individual Privacy in the Shadow of a National DataBase: The Need for Data Protection Legislation, 17 Cap. U. L. Rev. 117 (1987).

Richard A. Kaba, Note, Threshold Requirements for the FBI Under Exemption 7 of the Freedomof Information Act, 86 Mich. L. Rev. 620 (1987).

Lisa A. Reilly, The Freedom of Information Act and the Withholding of Documents Under Sec-tion 6103 of the Internal Revenue Code, 55 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 937 (1987).

Lisa A. Reilly, The Government in the Sunshine Act and the Privacy Act, 55 Geo. Wash. L. Rev.955 (1987).

- 523 -

Karen A. Winchester & James W. Zirkle, Freedom of Information and the CIA Information Act,21 U. Rich. L. Rev. 231 (1987).

Frances E. Zollers, The Implementation of the Consumer Product Safety Act Section 6(b) and theConflict with Freedom of Information Act Policies, 39 Admin. L. Rev. 61 (1987).

1988

David A. Barrett, Note, Facilitating Government Decision Making: Distinguishing BetweenMeetings and Nonmeetings Under the Federal Sunshine Act, 66 Tex. L. Rev. 1195 (1988).

Maria H. Benecki, Note, Developments Under the Freedom of Information Act - 1987, 1988Duke L.J. 566.

Laurie A. Doherty, The Government's Authority to Withhold Previously Disclosed InformationUnder FOIA, 56 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 880 (1988).

Laurie A. Doherty, Privacy Act, 56 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1028 (1988).

Amy M. Foran, Note, Accuracy Determination and De Novo Review as Required in a Request toAmend Individual Records Under the Federal Privacy Act, Doe v. United States, 61 Temp. L.Q.909 (1988).

Mark H. Grunewald, Freedom of Information Act Dispute Resolution, 40 Admin. L. Rev. 1(1988).

Craig J. Langstraat, IRS Confidentiality vs. Freedom of Information Act: The Clash Continues, 28Santa Clara L. Rev. 29 (1988).

Alvin J. Lorman et al., Tilting the Balance in Favor of Disclosure: The Scope of the Medical Rec-ords Exemption to the Federal Freedom of Information Act, 43 Food Drug Cosm. L.J. 17 (1988).

Andrew F. Reish, Protection of Government-Generated Evaluative Estimates Under Exemption 5of the Freedom of Information Act, 29 A.F. L. Rev. 201 (1988).

Carol Shockley, The Federal Presentence Investigation Report: Postsentence Disclosure Underthe Freedom of Information Act, 40 Admin. L. Rev. 79 (1988).

Bruce M. Stevens, Comment, Military Aviation Mishaps: The Right to Know Under the Freedomof Information Act v. the Need for Safety Privilege, 16 W. St. U. L. Rev. 287 (1988).

Donsia R. Strong, Comment, The Computer Matching and Privacy Protection Act of 1988: Ne-cessary Relief from the Erosion of the Privacy Act of 1974, 2 Software L.J. 391 (1988).

Thomas M. Susman, The Privacy Act and the Freedom of Information Act: Conflict and Resolu-tion, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 703 (1988).

1989

Jerry J. Berman, The Right to Know: Public Access to Electronic Public Information, 3 SoftwareL.J. 491 (1989).

Mark F. Bernstein, Note, The Federal Open Market Committee and the Sharing of GovernmentalPower with Private Citizens, 75 Va. L. Rev. 111 (1989).

- 524 -

David C. Boyle, Note, Proposal to Amend the United States Privacy Act to Extend its Protectionto Foreign Nationals and Non-Resident Aliens, 22 Cornell Int'l L.J. 285 (1989).

R. Townsend Davis, Jr., Note, The American Bar Association and Judicial Nominees: AdviceWithout Consent?, 89 Colum. L. Rev. 550 (1989).

Jonathan B. Forman, Sunshine in the Formulation of Federal Tax Policy, A Case Study: The 1988Eagle Lodge Tax Seminar for Government, 16 N. Ky. L. Rev. 299 (1989).

Margaret Gilhooley, The Availability of Decisions and Precedents in Agency Adjudications: TheImpact of the Freedom of Information Act Publication Requirements, 3 Admin. L.J. 53 (1989).

Jeffrey S. Golden, Comment, Information on the Federal Government's Electronic Databases: IsThere a First Amendment Right of Access?, 3 Software L.J. 65 (1989).

Richard L. Huff, A Preliminary Analysis of the Implementation of the Freedom of InformationReform Act of 1986, Army Law., Jan. 1989, at 7.

Kristi A. Miles, The Freedom of Information Act, Shielding Agency Deliberations from FOIADisclosure, 57 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1326 (1989).

Paul M. Nick, Comment, De Novo Review in Reverse Freedom of Information Act Suits, 50 OhioSt. L.J. 1307 (1989).

Henry H. Perrit, Jr., Electronic Acquisition and Release of Federal Agency Information: Analysisof Recommendations Adopted by the Administrative Conference of the United States, 41 Admin.L. Rev. 253 (1989).

Warren J. Roth, Note, Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. EPA: EPA's Need to Protect its Confiden-tial Sources Versus its Duty to Disclose Under the Freedom of Information Act, 7 Pace Envtl. L.Rev. 271 (1989).

Deanne M. Sobczak, A Survey of Recent Developments Under the Freedom of Information Act, 3Admin. L.J. 183 (1989).

George B. Trubow, Watching the Watchers: The Coordination of Federal Privacy Policy, 3 Soft-ware L.J. 391 (1989).

Gerard J. Waldron & Jeff A. Israel, Note, Developments Under the Freedom of Information Act -1988, 1989 Duke L.J. 686.

Edward C. Walterscheid, Access to Federally Funded Research Data Under the Freedom of Infor-mation Act, 15 Rutgers Computer & Tech. L.J. 1 (1989).

Richard J. Wood, You Should See Your IRS File: Access to IRS Information - What are a Tax-payer's Rights?, 21 St. Mary's L.J. 325 (1989).

Jan Worthington, Recent Case, Is There Freedom of I.R.S. Information? Church of Scientology ofCalifornia v. Internal Revenue Service, 42 Tax Law. 381 (1989).

1990

Glenn Dickinson, Comment, The Supreme Court's Narrow Reading of the Public Interest Servedby the Freedom of Information Act, 59 U. Cin. L. Rev. 191 (1990).

- 525 -

Jamie A. Grodsky, The Freedom of Information Act in the Electronic Age: The Statute is notUser Friendly, 31 Jurimetrics J. 17 (1990).

Note, Keeping Secrets: Congress, the Courts, and National Security Information, 103 Harv. L.Rev. 906 (1990).

Robert B. Kelso, A Practitioner's Guide to "Confidential Commercial and Financial Information"and the Freedom of Information Act, Army Law., July 1990, at 10.

R.A. Parker, Freedom of Expression and National Security: The Pivotal Role of the Freedom ofInformation Act, 28 Free Speech Y.B. 132 (1990).

Henry H. Perritt, Jr., Federal Electronic Information Policy, 63 Temp. L. Rev. 201 (1990).

Gerald G. Portney & Walter S. Goldberg, A Practitioner's Guide to the Freedom of InformationAct, 14 Rev. Tax'n Individuals 363 (1990).

Paul A. Rubin, Note, Applying the Freedom of Information Act's Privacy Exemption to Requestsfor Names and Addresses, 58 Fordham L. Rev. 1033 (1990).

George S. Tolley III, The Freedom of Information Act: Competing Interests in the SupremeCourt, 1990 Ann. Surv. Am. L. 497.

George B. Trubow, Protecting Informational Privacy in the Information Society, 10 N. Ill. U. L.Rev. 521 (1990).

Lori L. Vallone, Case Note, A Further Step Toward a New Exemption Seven of the Freedom ofInformation Act: John Doe Agency v. John Doe Corp., 24 Creighton L. Rev. 267 (1990).

Christopher W. Wasson, The Routine Use Exception to the Privacy Act: A Clarification of Com-patibility, Britt v. Naval Investigative Service, 35 Vill. L. Rev. 822 (1990).

S. Elizabeth Wilborn, Note, Developments Under the Freedom of Information Act - 1989, 1990Duke L.J. 1113.

Victor Williams, The ABA Judgemaker Committee is Exposed, Albeit Shaded from FACA Sun-shine, Public Citizen v. United States Department of Justice/Washington Legal Foundation v.United States Department of Justice, 12 Geo. Mason U. L. Rev. 249 (1990).

1991

Sean E. Andrussier, Note, The Freedom of Information Act in 1990: More Freedom for the Gov-ernment; Less Information for the Public, 1991 Duke L.J. 753.

Paul J. Campbell, Case Note, The Impact of Computer Data Banks on the Law Enforcement Ex-emption of the Freedom of Information Act: John Doe Agency v. John Doe Corporation, 4 Soft-ware L.J. 633 (1991).

Jennifer A. Clemens, Comment, Freedom of Information Act Exemption Seven is Broadened inJohn Doe Agency v. John Doe Corp., 16 J. Corp. L. 963 (1991).

Todd R. Coles, Comment, Does the Privacy Act of 1974 Protect Your Right to Privacy? AnExamination of the Routine Use Exemption, 40 Am. U. L. Rev. 957 (1991).

- 526 -

Trina Jones, Note, Collective Bargaining in the Federal Public Sector: Disclosing Employee Namesand Addresses Under Exemption Six of the Freedom of Information Act, 89 Mich. L. Rev. 980(1991).

David J. Murray, Note, New York Times Co. v. NASA: Troubled Skies Ahead for the Freedom ofInformation Act, 19 W. St. U. L. Rev. 325 (1991).

Shuttle Tapes, Like Personnel Files, Exempt from Disclosure, 15 News Media & L., Winter 1991,at 21.

Laurence H. Silberman, The American Bar Association and Judicial Nominations, 59 Geo. Wash.L. Rev. 1092 (1991).

Leo T. Sorokin, The Computerization of Government Information: Does it Circumvent PublicAccess Under the Freedom of Information Act and the Depository Library Program?, 24 Colum.J.L. & Soc. Probs. 267 (1991).

Robert G. Vaughn, Consumer Access to Product Safety Information and the Future of the Free-dom of Information Act, 5 Admin. L.J. 673 (1991).

Francis E. Zollers & David Barry, A Regulation in Search of a Rationale: An Empirical Study ofConsumer Product Safety Act Section 6(b) and its Effect on Information Disclosure Under theFreedom of Information Act, 43 Admin. L. Rev. 455 (1991).

1992

Andrew Blum, Is Vice President's Council Subject to FOIA?, 15 Nat'l L.J., Oct. 19, 1992, at 8.

Robert P. Deyling, Judicial Deference and De Novo Review in Litigation over National SecurityInformation Under the Freedom of Information Act, 37 Vill. L. Rev. 67 (1992).

Gregory R. Firehook, Privacy Act: The Increased Invulnerability of Incorrect Records Maintainedby Law Enforcement Agencies: Doe v. FBI, 60 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1509 (1992).

Heather Harrison, Note, Protecting Personal Information from Unauthorized Government Disclo-sures, 22 Mem. St. U. L. Rev. 775 (1992).

Michael J. Hirrel, Sunshine Act Leaves Agency in the Dark, 15 Legal Times, June 1, 1992, at 28.

Shannon E. Martin, Analysis of the Computer Security Act of 1987 and its Consequences for theFreedom of Information Act, 14 Comms. & L. 73 (1992).

Amy McDonald, Comment, Haitian Refugees and the Freedom of Information Act - United StatesDep't of State v. Ray, 112 S. Ct. 541 (1991), 26 Suffolk U. L. Rev. 201 (1992).

Stuart H. Newberger, Secrets of October 1962. Opening Cuban Missile Crisis Files Under FOIA,78 A.B.A. J. 72 (1992).

Michelle Nuszkiewicz, Note, Twenty Years of the Federal Advisory Committee Act: It's Time forSome Changes, 65 S. Cal. L. Rev. 957 (1992).

Dayna E. Peck, Note, Exemption 6 Does Not Bar Disclosure of Identifying Information of HaitianDeportees, Ray v. United States Department of Justice, 15 Suffolk Transnat'l L.J. 878 (1992).

Susan D. Rice, Access Law Pries Open Historical Work, 105 L.A. Daily J., June 11, 1992, at 7.

- 527 -

Mark A. Segal, Tax Data Disclosure Under the Freedom of Information Act: Evolution, Issuesand Analysis, 9 Akron Tax J. 79 (1992).

Seymour Topping, Freedom of Information Act Needs to be Brought Up to Date with ComputerEra, 105 L.A. Daily J., June 17, 1992, at 6.

Janice Toran, Secrecy Orders and Government Litigants: "A Northwest Passage Around theFreedom of Information Act?", 27 Ga. L. Rev. 121 (1992).

Elizabeth A. Vitell, Note, Toeing the Line in the Ninth Circuit: Proper Agency Justification ofFOIA Exemptions Clarified in Wiener v. FBI, 42 DePaul L. Rev. 795 (1992).

1993

Danae J. Aitchison, Note, Reining in the Glomar Response: Reducing CIA Abuse of the Freedomof Information Act, 27 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 219 (1993).

Mathew D. Bunker et al., Access to Government-Held Information in the Computer Age: Apply-ing Legal Doctrine to Emerging Technology, 20 Fla. St. U. L. Rev. 543 (1993).

Court Orders Access to Land Data Banks, 17 News Media & L., Winter 1993, at 3.

Court Says CIA Almost Exempt from FOIA, 17 News Media & L., Winter 1993, at 8.

Mark Fall, Privacy Protections of Computerized Information, 2 S. Cal. Interdisciplinary L.J. 165(1993).

Kevin M. Forde, Discovery from Government Agencies in the Preparation of Civil Litigation, 37Trial Law. Guide 76 (1993).

Robert M. Gellman, Fragmented, Incomplete, and Discontinuous: The Failure of Federal PrivacyRegulatory Proposals and Institutions, 6 Software L.J. 199 (1993).

Judge Halts Destruction of Bush's Records, 17 News Media & L., Winter 1993, at 3.

Rocco J. Maffei, The Impact of FOIA after Critical Mass, 22 Pub. Cont. L.J. 757 (1993).

Shannon E. Martin, Parallel Issues and Comparable Solutions for the Depository Library Programand the Freedom of Information Act, 15 Comms. & Law 21 (1993).

Deckle McLean, Privacy Gaining Heft as an FOIA Exemption, 15 Comms. & L. 25 (1993).

Richard L. Rainey, Freedom of Information Act: Stare Decisis and Statutory Interpretation, anArgument for a Complete Overruling of the National Parks Test, 61 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1430(1993).

Matthew J. Salzman, Note, Exemption 7(D) of the FOIA - The Evidentiary Showing the Govern-ment Must Make to Establish That a Source is Confidential: Department of Justice v. Landano,84 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 1041 (1993).

Karl J. Sanders, Comment, FOIA v. Federal Sector Labor Law: Which "Public Interest" Prevails?,62 U. Cin. L. Rev. 787 (1993).

Eric J. Sinrod, Blocking Access to Government Information Under the New Personal Privacy Rule,24 Seton Hall L. Rev. 214 (1993).

- 528 -

Lee J. Tilson, Freedom of Information Acts: Invaluable Resources, 29 Trial, May 1993, at 43.

Margaret W. Tindall, Note, Breast Implant Information as Trade Secrets: Another Look atFOIA's Fourth Exemption, 7 Admin. L. Rev. 213 (1993).

Suzanne E. Tomkies, Balancing Copyright Protection with Disclosure Under the Freedom ofInformation Act, 15 Comms. & Law 71 (1993).

Jeffrey D. Zimmerman, Note, United States Department of State v. Ray: The Distorted Appli-cation of the Freedom of Information Act's Privacy Exemption to Repatriated Haitian Migrants, 9Am. U. J. Int'l L. & Pol'y 385 (1993).

1994

Jenifer A. Belt, United States v. Landano: Advocate or Adversary of the Freedom of InformationAct, 25 U. Tol. L. Rev. (1994).

Tamara M. Burke, Note, Agencies are not Entitled to a Presumption of Confidentiality in MostExemption 7(D) Claims Made Pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act: United States De-partment of Justice v. Landano, 24 Seton Hall L. Rev. 1610 (1994).

Jay S. Bybee, Advising the President: Separation of Powers and the Federal Advisory CommitteeAct, 104 Yale L.J. 51 (1994).

Fred H. Cate et al., The Right to Privacy and the Public's Right to Know: The "Central Purpose"of the Freedom of Information Act, 46 Admin. L. Rev. 41 (1994).

Larry M. Elison & Deborah E. Elison, Comments on Government Censorship and Secrecy, 55Mont. L. Rev. 175 (1994).

John Y. Gotanda, Glomar Denials Under FOIA: A Problematic Privilege and a Proposed Alterna-tive Procedure of Review, 56 U. Pitt. L. Rev. 165 (1994).

Michael M. Lowe, The Freedom of Information Act in 1993-1994, 43 Duke L.J. 1282 (1994).

Andrew O. Martyniuk, An End to an FBI General Presumption of Confidentiality Under Freedomof Information Act Exemption 7(D), 63 U. Cin. L. Rev. 523 (1994).

Matthew J. Matule, Congress, the Courts, and Regulatory Oversight after Meyer v. Bush: Shouldthe Executive Office of the President Be Shielded from Congressional Sunshine?, 18 Vt. L. Rev.823 (1994).

James T. O'Reilly, Applying Federal Open Government Laws to Congress: An Explorative Anal-ysis and Proposal. (Special Congress Issue), 31 Harv. J. on Legis. 415 (1994).

Scott Raber, Note, Reinventing a Less Vigorous Freedom of Information Act: The Aftermath ofCritical Mass Energy Project v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1994 Ann. Surv. Am. L. 79.

Lila L. Seal, Note, The Future of the Freedom of Information Act's Deliberative Process Exemp-tion and Disclosure of Computerized Federal Records: Petroleum Information Corp. v. Depart-ment of Interior, 71 Denv. U. L. Rev. 719 (1994).

Catherine F. Sheehan, Opening the Government's Electronic Mail: Public Access to NationalSecurity Council Records, 35 B.C. L. Rev. 1145 (1994).

- 529 -

Pat Shockley, The Availability of "Trade Secret" Protection for University Research, 20 J.C. &U.L. 309 (1994).

Eric J. Sinrod, Freedom of Information Act Response Deadlines: Bridging the Gap Between Legis-lative Intent and Economic Reality, 43 Am. U. L. Rev. 325 (1994).

Eric J. Sinrod, Proposals for Expediting Access to Government Communications and Information,12 Comm. Law. 6 (1994).

G. Branch Taylor, The Critical Mass Decision: A Dangerous Blow to Exemption 4 Litigation, 2CommLaw Conspectus 133 (1994).

1995

Laurie Aurelia, The Federal Advisory Committee Act and Its Failure to Work Effectively in theEnvironmental Context, 23 B.C. Envtl. Aff. L. Rev. 87 (1995).

Pamela Dawn Baker, Case Law Development, FOIA Exemptions Not Waived When Public BodyFails to Respond to Written Requests, 47 S.C. L. Rev. 1 (1995).

Lillian R. BeVier, Information About Individuals in the Hands of the Government: Some Reflec-tions on Mechanisms for Privacy Protection, 4 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 455 (1995).

Nicole B. Casarez, Furthering the Accountability Principle in Privatized Federal Corrections: TheNeed for Access to Private Prison Records, 28 U. Mich. J.L. Ref. 249 (1995).

Major Keys, The FLRA Expands Application of Privacy Act Protection, Army Law., Sept. 1995, at38.

Michael A. Lawrence, Finding Shade from the Government in Sunshine Act: A Proposal to Per-mit Private Informal Background Discussions at the United States International Trade Commis-sion, 45 Cath. U. L. Rev. 1 (1995).

Charlene J. Lu, Seeking Privacy in Wireless Communications: Balancing the Right of IndividualPrivacy With the Need for Effective Law Enforcement, 17 Hastings Comm. & Ent. L.J. 529(1995).

W. Hebert McHarg, Note, The Federal Advisory Committee Act: Keeping InterjurisdictionalEcosystem Management Groups Open and Legal, 15 J. Energy Nat. Resources & Envtl. L. 437(1995).

James T. O'Reilly & Gracia M. Berg, Stealth Caused by Sunshine: How Sunshine Act Interpreta-tion Results in Less Information for the Public about the Decision-Making Process of the Interna-tional Trade Commission, 36 Harv. Int'l L.J. 425 (1995).

Henry H. Perritt, Sources of Rights to Access Public Information, 4 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 179(1995).

Laura B. Pincus & Clayton Trotter, The Disparity between Public and Private Sector EmployeePrivacy Protections: A Call for Legitimate Privacy Rights for Private Sector Workers, 33 Am. Bus.L.J. 51 (1995).

Amy E. Rees, Recent Developments Regarding the Freedom of Information Act: A Prologue to aFarce or Tragedy, Or Perhaps Both, 44 Duke L.J. 1183 (1995).

- 530 -

Lloyd L. Rich, Right to Privacy in the Workplace in the Information Age, 24 Colo. Law. 539(1995).

Roy A. Schotland, Re-examining the Freedom of Information Act's Exemption 8: Does it Give anUnduly 'Full Service' Exemption for Bank Examination Reports and Related Material?, 9 Admin.L.J. Am. U. 43 (1995).

Eric J. Sinrod, Improving Access to Government Information in an Era of Budgetary Constraints,27 Urb. Law. 105 (1995).

1996

Christopher P. Beall, The Exaltation of Privacy Doctrines Over Public Information Law, 45 DukeL.J. 1249 (1996).

Chuck Broscious, Gaining Information on the Legacy of Nuclear Weapons Production, 31 Gonz.L. Rev. 137 (1996).

Steven P. Croley, Practical Guidance on the Applicability of the Federal Advisory Committee Act,10 Admin. L.J. Am. U. 111 (1996).

Charles N. Davis et. al., Sunshine Laws and Judicial Discretion: A Proposal for Reform of StateSunshine Law Enforcement Provisions, 28 Urb. Law. 41 (1996).

David Faure, The Federal Advisory Committee Act: Balanced Representation and Open Meetingsin Conflict with Dispute Resolution, 11 Ohio St. J. on Disp. Resol. 489 (1996).

Thomas Freeman, Attorney Fee Awards Under the Freedom of Information Act, 64 Geo. Wash. L.Rev. 836 (1996).

Mark H. Grunewald, Freedom of Information and Confidentiality under the Administrative Dis-pute Resolution Act, 9 Admin. L.J. Am. U. 985 (1996).

Jane Kirtley, Freedom of Information Act-- How is it Working?, Comm. Law., Fall 1996, at 7.

Sheila Lynch, The Federal Advisory Committee Act: An Obstacle to Ecosystem Management byFederal Agencies, 71 Wash. L. Rev. 431 (1996).

Douglas D. Morris, Comment, Alabama-Tomigbee Rivers Coalition v. Department of Interior:Giving Sabers to a "Toothless Tiger," The Federal Advisory Committee Act, 26 Envtl. L. 393(1996).

Jeffrey Norgle, Comment, Revising the Freedom of Information Act for the Information Age: TheElectronic Freedom of Information Act, 14 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 817 (1996).

Dover A. Norris-York, Comment, The Federal Advisory Committee Act: Barrier or Boon to Effec-tive Natural Resource Management, 26 Envtl. L. 419 (1996).

Robert A. Nowadzky, A Comparative Analysis of Public Records Statutes, 28 Urb. Law. 65 (1996).

Laura Schenck, Freedom of Information Statutes: The Unfulfilled Legacy, 48 Fed. Comm. L.J. 371(1996).

Kenneth R. Shear, What You Don't Know Can Hurt You: E-Mail Privacy Claims Under the Fed-eral Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 36 Law Off. Econ. Mgmt. 493 (1996).

- 531 -

Paul M. Winters, Revitalizing the Sanctions Provision of the Freedom of Information Act Amend-ments of 1974, 84 Geo. L.J. 617 (1996).

Andrea L. Wolff, The Federal Advisory Committee Act and the Executive Privilege: Resolvingthe Separation of Powers Issue, 5 Seton Hall Const. L.J. 1023 (1996).

1997

R. Kevin Bailey, Note, "Did I Miss Anything?": Excising the National Security Council from FOIACoverage, 46 Duke L.J. 1475 (1997).

Kathy Bradley, Note, Do You Feel the Sunshine? Government in the Sunshine Act: Its Objec-tives, Goals, and Effect on the FCC and You, 49 Fed. Comm. L.J. 473 (1997).

Ivy L. Bridgett, An Expansion of the Privacy Exception and a Limitation on the ConfidentialityException Under the Freedom of Information Act, 65 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 809 (1997).

Jennifer E. Chung, Federal Advisory Committee Act, 65 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 786 (1997).

Stephen P. Croley & William F. Funk, The Federal Advisory Committee Act and Good Govern-ment, 14 Yale J. on Reg. 451 (1997).

David MacDonald, The Electronic Freedom of Information Act Amendments: A Minor Upgradeto Public Access Law, 23 Rutgers Computer & Tech. L.J. 357 (1997).

Joseph V. Kaplan & John P. Mahoney, Reckless Disregard: Intentional and Willful Violations ofthe Privacy Act's Investigatory Requirements, Fed. Law., May 1997, at 38.

Randolph May, Recent Development: Reforming the Sunshine Act, 49 Admin. L. Rev. 421(1997).

Kirsten L. Peters, Freedom of Information Act/Privacy Act, 65 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 792 (1997).

Alexi M. Poretz, Disclosure Under the Privacy Act: A Matter of Interpretation, 65 Geo. Wash. L.Rev. 801 (1997).

Kimberly Woolley, No Smoke Without FOIA: Rejecting an Exemption 5 Defense, 65 Geo. Wash.L. Rev. 817 (1997).

1998

Kathleen C. Dale, Note, Field Service Advice Memoranda May Be Obtained Under the Freedomof Information Act: Tax Analysts v. Internal Revenue Service, 51 Tax Law. 395 (1998).

Mark H. Grunewald, E-FOIA and the "Mother of All Complaints": Information Delivery andDelay Reduction, 50 Admin. L. Rev. 345 (1998).

Stephen M. Johnson, The Internet Changes Everything: Revolutionizing Public Participation andAccess to Government Information Through the Internet, 50 Admin. L. Rev. 277 (1998).

Senator Patrick Leahy, The Electronic FOIA Amendments of 1996: Reformatting the FOIA forOn-line Access, 50 Admin. L. Rev. 339 (1998).

- 532 -

Sasha A. Mason, The Freedom of Information Act: The National Security Council Is Not anAgency Under the Freedom of Information Act, 66 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. (1998).

Captain Metrey, Personnel Claims Files Releasable Under the Privacy Act, Army Law., Jan. 1998,at 135.

James T. O'Reilly, Expanding the Purpose of Federal Records Access: New Private Entitlement orNew Threat to Privacy, 50 Admin. L. Rev. 371 (1998).

Henry H. Perritt, Jr. Electronic Freedom of Information, 50 Admin. L. Rev. 391 (1998).

Arvin P. Shroff & Sharon M. Sheehan, FDA's Efforts to Improve Access to Agency Records, 53Food & Drug L.J. 321 (1998)

Michael E. Tankersley, How the Electronic Freedom of Information Act Amendments of 1996Update Public Access for the Information Age, 50 Admin. L. Rev. 421 (1998).

1999

Hilary S. Cairnie, C. Ernest Edgar, IV, An Imperfect Shield: How Private Parties Can Attack andDefeat the Executive Privilege for Deliberative Process in Government Procurement Litigation, 28Pub. Cont. 127 (1999).

Steven C. Carlson, Ernest D. Miller, Public Data and Personal Privacy, 16 Santa Clara Computer& High Tech. L.J. 83 (1999).

Craig D. Feiser, Privatization and the Freedom of Information Act: An Analysis of Public Accessto Private Entities Under Federal Law, 52 Fed. Comm. L.J. 21 (1999).

Bryan S. Gowdy, Should the Federal Government have an Attorney-Client Privilege?, 51 Fla. L.Rev. 695 (1999).

Martin E. Halstuk, Bits, Bytes, and The Right to Know: How the Electronic Freedom of Informa-tion Act Holds the Key to Public Access to a Wealth of Government Databases, 15 Santa ClaraComputer & High Tech. L.J. (1999). Peter M. Midgley, Jr., The Freedom of Information Act: Another Pond for Prior Art Fishing Expe-ditions, 27 AIPLA Q.J. 77 (1999).

James T. O'Reilly, The Freedom of Information Act Change Challenged in House and SenateHearings, 25-Fall Admin.& Reg. L. News 17 (1999).

2000

Ronald Backes, Freedom, Information, Security, 10 Seton Hall Const. L.J. (2000).

Steven W. Becker, Maintaining Secret Government Dossiers on the First Amendment Activitiesof American Citizens: The Law Enforcement Activity Exception to the Privacy, 50 Depaul L. Rev.675 (2000).

Martha A Churchill, The Freedom of Information Act-- Carry a Big Stick, 79 Mich. B.J. 836(2000).

- 533 -

Timothy L. Prochko, Freedom of Information Act-- Gun Ownership is Information of a PersonalNature and Disclosure of the Information Constitutes a Clearly Unwarranted Invasion of Individ-ual Privacy. Mager v. Department of State Police, 77 U. Det. Mercy L. Rev. 979 (2000).

Robert L. Saloschin, The Department of Justice and the Explosion of the Freedom of InformationAct Litigation, 52 Admin. L. Rev. 1401 (2000).

Victoria S. Salzmann, Are Public Records Really Public?: The Collision Between the Right to Pri-vacy and the Release of Public Court Records Over the Internet, 52 Baylor L. Rev. 355 (2000).

Keith T. Tashima, The Disclosure of Politically Sensitive Species' Location Information Under theFreedom of Information Act: On Whether Audubon Society's "Puzzling Situation" Should beAddressed by Legislation, 66 Brook. L. Rev. 609 (2000).

2001

Brooke Barnett, Use of Public Records Databases in Newspaper and Television Newsrooms, 53Fed. Comm. L.J. 557 (2001).

Stephanie Byers, The Internet: Privacy Lost, Identities Stolen, 40 Brandeis L.J. 141 (2001).

Stephen Gidiere, Lawrence P. Mellinger, Stemming the Release of Commercially Valuable Infor-mation Under FOIA, 16 Nat'l Resources & Env't 288 (2001).

Carol Might, DNA and The Freedom of Information Act: Information or Invasion?, 26 Okla. CityU.L. Rev. 773 (2001).

Marion J. Radson, Elizabeth A. Waratuke, The Attorney-Client and Work Product Privileges inGovernment Entities, 30 Stetson L. Rev. 779 (2001). Mark G. Young, Note, What Big Eyes and Ears you Have!: A new Regime for Covert Governmen-tal Surveillance, 70 Fordham L. Rev. 1017 (2001).

2002

David A. Anderson, Freedom of the Press, 80 Tex. L. Rev. 429 (2002).

David Arkush, Preserving “Catalyst” Attorneys’ Fees Under the Freedom of Information Act inthe Wake of Buckhannon Board and Care Home v. West Virginia Department of Health andHuman Resources, 37 Harv. C.R.-C.L. L. Rev. 131 (2002).

Greg Bass & Harry Hammitt, Freedom of Information Act Access to Documents of Private Con-tractors Doing the Public's Business, 35 Clearinghouse Rev. 607 (2002).

Stephen Gidiere, Jason Forrester, Balancing Homeland Security and Freedom of Information, 16Nat. Resources & Env’t 139 (2002).

Gregory H. McClure, The Treatment of Contract Prices Under the Trade Secrets Act and Free-dom of Information Act Exemption 4: Are Contract Prices Really Trade Secrets?, 31 Pub. Cont.L.J. 185 (2002).

Arthur H. Siegal, Document Destruction Violates the FOIA: Government Agencies RoutinelyDelete E-mail Records that should be Accessible under the Freedom of Information Act, 81 Mich.B.J. 15 (2002).