LaShawn V Fenty Contempt Order CasLaShawn V Fenty Contempt Order
LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA
-
Upload
william-parks -
Category
Documents
-
view
29 -
download
0
description
Transcript of LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA
![Page 1: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA
![Page 2: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT 1971
CONTEMPT
OBJECTIVE
• To examine the basic purpose of contempt law in India.
• Ninty nine percent of the failures come from people who
have the habit of making excuses.
George Washington
![Page 3: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
DEFINITION
Contempt of court is defined as an act or omission
calculated to interfere with the due administration of
justice.
V.C. Mishra’s case; (1995) 2 SCC 584
![Page 4: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
MEANING OF CONTEMPT
1. Wilful disobedience to, or open disrespect of a court or judge.
2. Contempt means lack of respect or reverence for something.
![Page 5: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Contempt of court is disobedience of the court by acting
in opposition to the authority, justice and dignity thereof.
It signifies a wilful disregard or disobedience of the court
order, it also signifies such conduct as tends to bring the
authority of the court and the administration of justice
into dispute.
Baradakanta Mishra V Bhimsen Dixit ; 1973 (1) SCC 446
![Page 6: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
CONTEMPT LAW
PURPOSE
To keep the administration of justice pure and
undefiled.
![Page 7: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
CONCEPT
Contempt jurisdiction is inherent in a court of record from
the very nature of court itself.
![Page 8: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
NEED
To deal sternly with any action which has the
tendency to
• interfere with, or• obstruct
the due course of justice.
![Page 9: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
CONTEMPT JURISDICTION TOUCHES UPON TWO FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS
• The right to personal liberty• The right to freedom of expression
![Page 10: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
CONTEMPT LAW
A CONFLICT between
Freedom of speech in the Constitution
versus
Need to safeguard the status and dignity of courts
and
interests of administration of justice.
![Page 11: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
WHILE INVOKING CONTEMPT LAW CARE IS TO BE TAKEN
THAT
• The dignity of the court is to be maintained at all costs.
• Contempt jurisdiction, which is of a special nature, should be sparingly used.
![Page 12: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
EXCEPTIONS TO CONTEMPT
1. Innocent publications
2. Fair comments/criticism
![Page 13: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
SECTION 3
Innocent publication and distribution of matter if
the person had no reasonable grounds for
believing that the proceeding was pending in a
court.
![Page 14: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
REACH OF SECTION 3
• Publication Sec 3(1) and (2)(a) Pending
(b) Not pending
• Distribution Sec 3 (3)
![Page 15: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
PUBLICATION may be by
• words– spoken, or– written
• signs • visible representation• or otherwise
![Page 16: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
SECTION 4
Fair and accurate report of judicial proceeding
![Page 17: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
SECTION 5
Fair criticism of judicial act on the merits of any
case heard and finally decided.
![Page 18: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
SECTION 7
Publication of information relating to proceedings
in chambers or in camera.
![Page 19: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Fair comments, even if outspoken, but made
without any malice or attempting to impair the
administration of justice and made in good
faith and in proper language do not attract any
punishment for contempt.
Jaswant Singh V Virender Singh
1995 Supp (1) SCC 384
![Page 20: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Judgments are open to criticism that must be
done without casting aspersions on the judge
and the courts, and without adverse
comments amounting to scandalising the
courts.
![Page 21: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
EXAMPLES OF WHAT CONSTITUTES CONTEMPT
1. Not caring of the warrant issued by the criminal
Court.
2. Any wilful disobedience of the order of the court to do or abstain from doing any act or breach of any undertaking given to the court.
3. Attributing improper motive to a judge or scurrilous
abuse of a judge will amount to scandalising the court.
Rajesh Kumar Singh V High Court of Judicature of
MP; AIR 2007 SC 2725.
![Page 22: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
It is to be noted that the criticism of judiciary should be
constructive and not destructive. One may weigh a
Judge critically - academically but never inveigh him
personally.
![Page 23: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
DEFENCES TO CONTEMPT
1. Truth Section 13
2. Privileges
![Page 24: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
WHEN IS CONTEMPT NOT PUNISHABLE?
Section 13
• If it does not substantially interferes with the due course of justice.
• Justification by truth is a valid defence, if it is in public interest and the request for invoking the said defence is bonafide.
![Page 25: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
R.K. ANAND V REGISTRAR
DELHI HIGH COURT ;
(2009) 8 SCC 106
![Page 26: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Justices BN Agrawal, GS Singhvi
and Aftab Alam
![Page 27: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Judgment by Justice Aftab Alam
![Page 28: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Facts of the case
1. The criminal trial in a case of reckless driving by Sanjeev Nanda, a young person of a very wealthy business family which crashed to death six people in Delhi meandered endlessly for eight years.
2. NDTV, a news channel telecast a programme on 30 May 2007 in which the Special Public Prosecutor and R.K. Anand, the Senior Defence Counsel, were seen negotiating sell out of a prosecution witness for a very high price.
![Page 29: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
According to NDTV, the programme was based on a clandestine sting operation.
3. Delhi High Court suo motu initiated a proceeding for criminal contempt and issued notice to R.K. Anand and IU Khan under Section 2(c) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971
4. During the pendency of the matter in the High Court, R.K. Anand filed a petition requesting Justice Manmohan Sarin, the Presiding Judge to recuse himself from the proceeding.
![Page 30: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
He stated in the petition that he had a feeling that he was not likely to get justice at the hands of Manmohan Sarin. He made the prayer that the main matter be transferred to be heard by some other bench of which Justice Sarin was not a member.
5. The High Court held that the evidence and circumstances fully established that both IU Khan and R.K. Anand were guilty of the charges framed against
them.
![Page 31: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
It accordingly convicted them for criminal contempt of court and sentenced them by prohibiting them from appearing in the Delhi High Court and the Courts subordinate to it for a period of four months from the date of the judgment. The court also recommended to the full court to divest them of the honour of being designated as Senior Advocates and also sentenced them to a fine of Rs. 2000/- each.
![Page 32: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Law Laid Down
1. Suo motu cognizance taken by High Court on basis of telecast alone. The court examined the audio and video recordings of sting operation. The findings of High Court were sustained. It had rightly punished them by prohibiting them from appearing for a period of four months and holding that they had forfeited their right to be designated as Senior Advocates and imposing fine.
![Page 33: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
2. A motivated application for recusal needs to be dealt with sternly and viewed as interference in due course of justice leading to penal consequences.
3. Directions given to High Courts not having framed rules under Section 34 of Advocates Act to frame rules within four months. The Rules should indicate need for specific notice to be issued when punishment of debarring an Advocate from practice be imposed.
![Page 34: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
4. Telecast of sting operation exposing collusion between defence counsel and prosecutor did not amount to contempt of court.
![Page 35: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
The programme was intended to prevent an attempt to interfere with or obstruct the due course of a pending matter. It was in larger public interest and served an important public cause.
5. Grave concerns and dismay expressed on decline of ethical and professional standards amongst lawyers. Bar Council of India and the Bar Councils of different States cannot escape their responsibility.
![Page 36: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
6. High Court’s powers of superintendence over subordinate judiciary. Power of control should also be exercised to protect them from external interference that may some times appear overpowering to them and to support them to discharge their duties fearlessly. Criminal justice system should be insulated from external influences aimed to subvert trials.
![Page 37: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
IN RE : VINAY CHANDRA MISHRA
(1995) 2 SCC 584
![Page 38: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Facts of the case
Allegations of contempt committed in the face of a High
Court were made against a Senior Counsel. He was asked
by the Bench regarding the provision under which the
impugned order had been passed. He started shouting at
the bench. He said would get the Judge transferred or
impeached and threatened by saying that he had “turned
up many judges”. He created a scene in the Court. He lost
his temper and, according to the Judge, “except to abuse
him of mother and sister” the contemnor had insulted him
like anything. The contemnor was also President of the
Bar and Chairman of the Bar Council of India. The matter
was referred by the Acting Chief Justice to the Supreme
Court.
![Page 39: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
The Supreme Court took suo motu cognizance and issued
a show cause notice to the contemnor. In his counter and
additional counter, a different version of the incident was
put up by the contemnor. He alleged that in fact it was the
judge who hadcommitted contempt of his own court.
He filed application for initiating proceedings against the
Judge.
![Page 40: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
At a subsequent stage written unconditional apology was
also filed by the contemnor by seeking therein to withdraw
his application, petitions, counters, allegations and
submissions.
The Court sentenced the contemnor VC Mishra to undergo
simple imprisonment for six weeks. Also he was
suspended from practicing as an advocate for a period of
three years.
![Page 41: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Issues Raised
1. Whether Supreme Court can take cognizance of contempt of a High Court and initiate suo motu proceedings against a contemnor?
2. Whether a contemnor has a right to examine the Judge or Judges before whom contempt was committed?
![Page 42: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
3. Whether it is necessary to summon the Judge for examination to verify the allegations against the contemnor when the version of the contemnor is different?
4. Whether a junior member of the Bench is barred in any way by any convention or otherwise, from putting questions to the Bar?
![Page 43: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Law Laid Down
1. Supreme Court can take cognizance of a contempt of a High Court and suo motu initiate contempt proceedings against the contemnor.
2. When a High Court is dealing with a case of criminal contempt and there is justification for adopting summary procedure and punishing the offender on the spot, the contemnor has no right to examine the Judge or Judges before whom contempt is alleged to have been committed.
![Page 44: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
3. Jurisdiction and power of Supreme Court to take cognizance of any contempt of court and to award punishment for it are not circumscribed by any statute.
4. Judiciary in a democratic written Constitution has been assigned a special role and hence the need to protect its dignity and authority. There is a need and justification for vesting the extraordinary power in a court to punish for the contempt of the Court.
![Page 45: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
5. Every member of the Bench is on a par with the other member or members of the Bench. The lawyer or the litigant concerned has to answer the questions put to him by any member of the Bench.
![Page 46: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
ARUNDHATI ROY, In Re
(2002) 3 SCC 343
![Page 47: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Facts of the case
Arundhati Roy, a writer, was interested in the result of a
litigation pending before the Supreme Court. It was alleged
that at a dharna organised in front of Supreme Court she
had raised improper slogans against the Court. When
issued a show cause notice, she denied having raised such
slogans. She further stated that the Supreme Court could
not spare a sitting Judge to hold inquiry into Tehelka
Scandal. However, when it came to an absurd, despicable
and entirely unsubstantiated petition, it displayed a
disturbing willingness to issue notice. She added that the
same indicated a disquieting inclination to silence criticism
and muzzle dissent, to harass and intimidate those who
disagreed with the Supreme Court.
![Page 48: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
The court sentenced her to simple imprisonment for one
day and to pay a fine of Rs. 2000/-. In case of default of
payment of fine, she was to undergo simple
imprisonment for three months.
![Page 49: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Issues Raised
1. Whether it would be permissible to initiate contempt proceedings for scandalising the court where the contents of an affidavit cause no contempt to any Judge personally but the action tried to cast an injury to the public by creating a wrong impression in the mind of the people regarding integrity, ability and fairness of the judiciary?
![Page 50: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
2. Extent to which and circumstances in which fair criticism of Judge, court or its functioning would be permissible under Article 19(1) (a) and (2)?
3. Whether freedom of press is guaranteed separately from and is the same as freedom of expression under Article 19(1)?
![Page 51: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
4. How should the court deal with a case when a contemnor does not show any repentance or remorse but persistently and consistently tried to justify the prima facie contemptuous action and to frustrate the contempt proceedings?
![Page 52: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Law Laid Down
1. Proceedings under Section 14 of the Contempt of Courts Act are distinguishable from Section 15 of the said Act. When action is at the instance of the Court there is no question of any motion of and prejudice from any Judge. Accepting the plea raised by the respondent would amount to depriving all the Judges of the Court to hear the matter and thus frustrate the contempt proceedings which cannot be the mandate of law.
![Page 53: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
2. The judiciary is not immune from criticism but when that criticism is based on obvious distortion or gross misstatement and made in a manner which is designed
to lower the respect of the judiciary and destroy public.
![Page 54: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
3. Under the Constitution, there is no separate guarantee of the freedom of the press and it is the same freedom of expression, which is conferred on all citizens under Article 19(1). Any expression of opinion would therefore, be not immune from the liability for exceeding the limits either under the law of defamation or contempt of court or the other constitutional limitations under Article 19(2).
![Page 55: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
4. When a respondent has not shown any repentance or regret or remorse, no lenient view should be taken in the matter. It is difficult for the court either to shrug off or to hold the accusations made as comments of an outspoken ordinary man and permit the wrong headed to err therein.
![Page 56: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
SAHARA INDIA REAL ESTATE CORP LTD.
V
SEBI
![Page 57: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Five Judges Bench Justice S.H. Kapadia, D.K. Jain S.S.
Nijjar, Ranjana Desai and J.S. Khehar.
![Page 58: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
Judgment by
Justice S.H. Kapadia, CJI
![Page 59: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
Importance
Doctrine of Postponement
![Page 60: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
Facts of the Case
1. In a matter pending before it, the Supreme Court asked the SAHARA and SEBI to attempt to reach a consensus.
2. A day prior to the next date of hearing, one of the news channels flashed the details of the proposal made by SAHARA to SEBI
3. On a request made by SAHARA, the Supreme Court decided to take up the matter with regard to the reporting of subjudice matters.
![Page 61: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
It related to reporting of matters by electronic and
print media.
![Page 62: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
Issues Raised
1. Whether the courts can lay down guidelines for the media?
2. Whether the media should self regulate itself.
3. The balancing of rights under Articles 19(1)(a) vis a vis 21
![Page 63: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
There is a difference between law making and framing of
guidelines. Hence, can the Supreme Court entertain
such a matter.
![Page 64: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
Law Laid Down
![Page 65: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
Open justice permits fair and accurate reports of court
proceedings to be published.
![Page 66: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
1. Free speech, in appropriate cases, has got to co-relate with right to a fair trial.
2. Trial by newspapers comes in the category of acts which interferes with the course of justice or due administration of justice.
3. Prior restraint has not been rejected as constitutionally impermissible.
![Page 67: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
Postponement of publicity is a judicial mechanism to
balance presumption of innocence.
The applicant who seeks order of postponement of
publicity must displace the presumption of open justice.
![Page 68: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
Postponement order not only safeguards fairness of the
later or connected trials, it prevents possible contempt by
the media.
![Page 69: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
Balancing of rights under Article 19(1) or equal public
interest by order of postponement of publication or publicity
would apply in cases in which there is real and substantial
risk of prejudice to the proper administration of justice or to
the fairness of trial and within the parameters of necessity
and proportionality which would satisfy the test of
reasonableness in Articles 14 and 19(2).
![Page 70: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
The postponement orders is a neutralizing device evolved
by the Courts to balance interests of equal weightage, viz.
freedom of expression vis a vis freedom of trial, in the
context of the law of contempt.
![Page 71: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
Order of postponement should be passed only when
reasonable alternative methods or measures such as
change of venue or postponement of trial will not prevent
the risk to the fairness of the trial and when the salutary
effects of such orders outweigh the deleterious effects to
the free expression of those effected by the prior restraint.
![Page 72: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
The postponement order is not a punitive measure, but a
preventive measures.
![Page 73: LAW OF CONTEMPT AND MEDIA](https://reader035.fdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062721/56813623550346895d9d9811/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
The text of Article 141 means law made while interpreting
the statutes or the Constitution. Such judicial law making
is a part of judicial process.