Law, Justice, and Society: A Sociolegal Introduction Chapter 11 The Law and Social Change.

23
Law, Justice, and Society: A Sociolegal Introduction Chapter 11 The Law and Social Change

Transcript of Law, Justice, and Society: A Sociolegal Introduction Chapter 11 The Law and Social Change.

Law, Justice, and Society:A Sociolegal Introduction

Chapter 11The Law and Social Change

The Law and Social Change

What is Social Change? any relatively enduring alteration

in social relationships, behavior patterns, values, norms, and attitudes occurring over time

The Law and Social Change

Law as a Cause of Social Changelaw is mostly reactivelaw can be an independent source of

change

The Law and Social Change

Law as a Cause of Social Change (cont.)

two views:conservative:

active use of law to generate social change is wrong

law must be a natural extension of social custom

The Law and Social Change

Law as a Cause of Social Change (cont.)

other view: too many customs in the United States for the law to be based on only one

law is instead based on a general, abstract, universalistic principle of justice

The Law and Social Change

Reciprocal Relationship Between Social Change and Law

changes in law give rise to changes in social customs

changes in social customs give rise to changes in law

law is facilitative rather than causative of social change

The Law and Social Change

Alcohol use causes crime

4th Amendment rights need protecting

LegislaturesCourts

Civil Rights Acts 18th Amendment (Prohibition)

Exclusionary rule

Racial segregation is

wrong

Business should be regulated

Sherman Anti-trust Act

Typical Role of Law in Social Change

Social Demands:

Legislative Acts/Judicial Decisions:

The Law and Social Change

Social Movements, the Law, and Social Change most often facilitative rather than causative social movement (Tilly, 1984, p. 306): “a

sustained series of interactions between powerholders and persons successfully claiming to speak on behalf of a constituency lacking formal representation in the course of which those persons make publicly visible demands for changes in the distribution or exercise of power, and back those demand with public demonstrations of support”

The Law and Social Change

Social Movements, the Law, and Social Change Cont’d

politics of social movements depend on democracy

before a judiciary interpreted the Constitution, social movements were unlikely to go anywhere without violence

contagion effect- arousal of previously silent groups once a social movement is observed successfully making its rights claim

The Law and Social Change

Examples of the Role of Law in Social Movements:

worker’s rightsrights of gays and lesbiansabortion rightswomen's rightsminority and racial/ethnic rights

The Law and Social Change

British Law and the American RevolutionBritish laws after the French and Indian

Wars were designed to force colonialists to pay their share of the war expense

both statute and case law supported thisAmericans considered the revolution a

legal declaration of divorce based on the British constitution, specially that King George III had overstepped his authority

The Law and Social Change

Law and Social Engineering in USSRpre-USSR law suppressed social change

and retarded social progressUSSR used the law to force social

change the Soviet flip-flop on the "bourgeois family"

law coupled with police tactics can result in social change

law based on custom is more efficient

The Law and Social Change

The U.S. Supreme Court and Social Change

Rosenberg’s (1991) two views of the USSC’s ability to induce social change

dynamic view constrained view

The Law and Social Change

The Dynamic Viewthe Court can be more effective than

other government institutions in bringing about social change

this is because it is free of election concerns

The Law and Social Change

The Constrained View the Court can rarely produce significant

social change due to three constraints: bounded nature of constitutional rights lacks the necessary independence from

the other branches of government lacks the tools to develop policies and

implement decisions

The Law and Social Change

USSC has created little social change unless all three of these oppositions have not been present

however, dynamism can exist when coupled with the USSC’s main resource: legitimacy

The Law and Social Change

The USSC and Legitimacythe ability to command compliance

with rules despite lacking means to compel

Weber’s three types: 1. Traditional 2. Charismatic 3. Rational-legal

Supreme Court enjoys all of these

The Law and Social Change

Strict Constructionistsjustices who believe that the Court’s

task is to take the Constitution in light of its Framers’ original intent

what effect would such justices have on social change?

The Law and Social Change

Judicial Activismjudicial governance: violation of the

constitutional separation of powers

The Law and Social Change

USSC’s Role in Maintaining the Status Quo

extreme concentration of wealth leads to de facto plutocracy functioning beneath the "official" government

U.S. Constitution is an economic document that favors moneyed business class

The Law and Social Change

USSC’s Role in Maintaining the Status Quo (cont.)

Fourteenth Amendment created to protect the most deprived

members of our society USSC used it to protect rich business

interests against working-class interests later used it according to its "original

intent"

The Law and Social Change

USSC’s Role in Inducing Social ChangeUSSC expanded the federal

government’s poweracted as a "nation builder"created a "national identity"

The Law and Social Change

USSC’s Role in Inducing Social Change (cont.)Marshall Court: molding a national identity Taney Court: state’s rights take precedence Warren and Burger Courts: the "due process

revolution" these decisions have become institutionalized

and accepted especially among younger generation