Law Commission Report No. 197- Public Prosecutor¢s Appointments, 2006
-
Upload
latest-laws-team -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
0
Transcript of Law Commission Report No. 197- Public Prosecutor¢s Appointments, 2006
-
8/18/2019 Law Commission Report No. 197- Public Prosecutor¢s Appointments, 2006
1/39
Law Commission of India
197th Report
on
Public Prosecutor’s Appointments
July !""#
LatestLaws.com
-
8/18/2019 Law Commission Report No. 197- Public Prosecutor¢s Appointments, 2006
2/39
LatestLaws.com
Justice LA$ C%&&I''I%( %) I(*IA
&+ JA,A((A*-A RA% '-A'.RI /-A$A( Chairman (0$ *0L-I11" ""1 .0L2 !3345576 )A2 8""1 !3"734#5 !334447" 0mail2 ch+lc:sb+nic+in
Residence2 1 JA(PA.- (0$ *0L-I ; 11" "11 .0L2 !3"195#6
)+(o+#83
'ub2 197th Report of the Law Commission on >Public Prosecutor’sAppointments+
I ha?e @reat pleasure in forwardin@ the 197 th Report of the Law Commission on>Public Prosecutor’s Appointments’+
.he &inistry of -ome Affairs in their file bearin@ (o+1!%ffice I* (o+4"6
-
8/18/2019 Law Commission Report No. 197- Public Prosecutor¢s Appointments, 2006
3/39
LatestLaws.com
has @one into the uestion of the procedure for appointment of Public Prosecutors and has@i?en its recommendations+ A draft /ill for substitutin@ eEistin@ subsections 85 to 8# of sec+ !5 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 is also anneEed to this Report+
Initially the Commission has @one into the role of the Public Prosecutors as stated in the =ud@ments of the 'upreme Court and the earlier Reports of the Law Commission+ .heCommission has stated that the Public Prosecutor has to be independent of the eEecuti?eand all eEternal influences also independent of the police and the in?esti@ation process+-e cannot ad?ice the police in matters relatin@ to in?esti@ation+ -e has duties to the'tate to the Court and to the accused+ -e has to dischar@e his duties ob=ecti?ely+ -e isin the position of a minister of =ustice assistin@ the Court+
As re@ard the procedure for appointment of Public Prosecutors Addl+ Public Prosecutorsin the 'essions Court the reuirement in sec+ !585 of the *istrict &a@istrate consultin@the 'essions Jud@e is salutary and it is unfortunate that some 'tates ha?e dispensed withthis procedure of consultation with the 'essions Jud@e+
.he pro?isions of sec+ !58# of the Code as enacted by Parliament states that once aRe@ular Cadre of Prosecutin@ %fficers is constituted in a 'tate all appointments to the post of Public Prosecutorshall’ by the word >may’ asthey felt that some of the posts of Public Prosecutor
-
8/18/2019 Law Commission Report No. 197- Public Prosecutor¢s Appointments, 2006
4/39
LatestLaws.com
with the 'essions Jud@e and selection of members of the /ar with such eEperience and@ood character such a procedure will offend Art+ 15+
Liewise in re@ard to sec+ !58# 6"F of posts of Addl+ Public Prosecutor must be filled by Asst+ Public Prosecutors from a panel prepared by a 'tate Le?el Committee
consistin@ of 8a a retired -i@h Court Jud@e
-
8/18/2019 Law Commission Report No. 197- Public Prosecutor¢s Appointments, 2006
5/39
LatestLaws.com
I ( * 0
'+(o+ Contents Pa@e (os+
Chapter I1+ .he Reference by the -ome &inistry
and the ?iews of the P&% 3 to #
!+ Chapter IIIndependent role of Public Prosecutor in the criminal =ustice process 7 to 13
3+ Chapter III,o?ernment of India and 'tates2 Le@islationand procedure for appointment of Public
Prosecutors and Art+ 15 15 to !"
5+ Chapter IRecommendations of Law Commission onthe three su@@estions of P&% !1 to 33
6+ A((0HR0*raft Amendment to subsections 85 to 8#
of sec+ !5 of Code of Criminal Procedure1973 in supersession of all amendmentsincludin@ amendments by the CriminalProcedure 8Amendment Act !""6 35 to 3#
6
LatestLaws.com
-
8/18/2019 Law Commission Report No. 197- Public Prosecutor¢s Appointments, 2006
6/39
LatestLaws.com
Chapter I
.he Reference by the -ome &inistry and the ?iews of the P&%
As desired by the Prime &inister’s %ffice 8hereinafter referred to as
P&% the &inistry of -ome Affairs has sou@ht the ?iews of the Law
Commission of India in re@ard to the su@@estions made by the P&%
concernin@ the appointment of the Public Prosecutors under section !5 of
the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973+ .he P&% referred initially to a
su@@estion which had been made to it to the followin@ effect2
BThere is a need to fix responsibility on Directorate of
Prosecution. The criminal trial should always be conducted by
Police/ CBI prosecutors only but not by State Public Prosecutors.
There is a problem of accountability in contractual public
prosecutors appointed on political recommendations in a State.
The section in CrPC which empowers the State Goernment to
appoint public prosecutors should be !ot amended with immediate
effect. "ll police prosecutors/public prosecutors/senior public
prosecutors should either be allowed to conduct the trial or if
public prosecutors are to be selected in states they should be
selected throu!h PSCs after conductin! thorou!h screenin! and
examination.#
.he P&% then considered the abo?e su@@estion+ It referred to section
!583 of the CrPC under which the 'tate ,o?t+ shall appoint a Public
#
LatestLaws.com
-
8/18/2019 Law Commission Report No. 197- Public Prosecutor¢s Appointments, 2006
7/39
LatestLaws.com
Prosecutor for e?ery district and may also appoint one or more Addl+ Public
Prosecutors and to section !585 under which the *istrict &a@istrate shall
in consultation with the 'essions Jud@e prepare a panel of persons who
are in his opinion fit to be appointed as Public Prosecutor or Addl+ Public
Prosecutor 8hereinafter referred to as PP
-
8/18/2019 Law Commission Report No. 197- Public Prosecutor¢s Appointments, 2006
8/39
LatestLaws.com
In the abo?e conteEt the P&% su@@ested that followin@ measures
may be considered2
B8i &ain@ of appointment of Public Prosecutors< Additional Public
Prosecutors only from amon@st persons constitutin@ re@ular Cadre
of Prosecutin@ %fficers ; in terms of s+ !58# of the Code of
Criminal Procedure 19"4 8sic 1973 as ori@inally le@islated by
Parliament may need to be le@islati?ely restored to o?erride
?arious 'tate Amendments+ )urther a time limit may need to be
prescribed by law to reuire creation of such cadres in a definite
timeframe while simultaneously incorporatin@ a >sunset clause’ in
s+ !585 of the Cr+P+C+
8i? Reuirement of consultation with 'essions Jud@e u
-
8/18/2019 Law Commission Report No. 197- Public Prosecutor¢s Appointments, 2006
9/39
LatestLaws.com
*istrict consistent with Art+ 15 of the Constitution of India and which will
not permit arbitrary eEercise of power while appointin@ PPs
-
8/18/2019 Law Commission Report No. 197- Public Prosecutor¢s Appointments, 2006
10/39
LatestLaws.com
Chapter II
Independent role of Public Prosecutor in the criminal =ustice process
.he su@@estions by the P&% ha?e to be considered in the li@ht of
se?eral le@al principles applicable to the criminal =ustice system and in the
conteEt of the role that the Public Prosecutor is eEpected to play and the
need for independence efficiency and accountability in his functionin@+
/efore we @o into the role of the Public Prosecutor first we must
reco@niKe the independent role of the police durin@ in?esti@ation and
brin@in@ to boo those who ?iolate the law as declared by the 'upreme
Court of India+
Police to act on their own without outside influence2
In Hnion of India ?+ 'ushil umar &odi2 1997 85 'CC 77" the
'upreme Court uoted with appro?al the followin@ words of Lord *ennin@
in R ?+ &etropolitan Police Commissioner2 19#4 81 All 0R 7#3 as to the
independent role of police2
BI ha?e no hesitation howe?er in holdin@ that lie e?ery constable
in the land he should be and is independent of the eEecuti?e+ -e is
not sub=ect to the order of the 'ecretary of 'tateM++ I hold it to be the
duty of the Commissioner of Police as it is of e?ery Chief constable
to enforce the law of the land+ -e must tae steps so to post his men
that crimes may be detectedN and that honest citiKens may @o about
1"
LatestLaws.com
-
8/18/2019 Law Commission Report No. 197- Public Prosecutor¢s Appointments, 2006
11/39
LatestLaws.com
these affairs in peace+ -e must decide whether or not suspected
persons are to be prosecutedN and if need be brin@ the prosecution or
see that it is brou@htN but in all these thin@s be not the ser?ant of
anyone sa?e the law itself+ (o &inister of the Crown can tell him
that he must or must not eep obser?ation on this place or thatN or
that he must or must not prosecute this man or that one+ (or can any
police authority tell him so+ .he responsibility for law enforcement
lies on him+ -e is answerable to the law and to the law alone+D
.he 'upreme Court after uotin@ the abo?e obser?ations obser?ed2
BAccordin@ to the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 the formation
of the opinion as to whether or not there is a case to place the accused
for trial is that of the police officer main@ the in?esti@ation and the
final steps in the in?esti@ation is taen only by the police and by no
other authority see Abhinandan Jha ?+ *inesh &ishra2 8AIR 19#4 'C
117+ .his must be borne in mind as also that the scope and purpose
of a proceedin@ lie the present is to ensure a proper and faithful
performance of its duty by the police officer by resort to the
prero@ati?e writ of mandamusD
.hus the police are eEpected to enforce the law without any
influence from the 0Eecuti?e+
Public Prosecutor in the criminal =ustice system2
11
LatestLaws.com
-
8/18/2019 Law Commission Report No. 197- Public Prosecutor¢s Appointments, 2006
12/39
LatestLaws.com
It is worthwhile to @o into the role of a Public Prosecutor in the
criminal =ustice system+
B.he Prosecutor has a duty to the 'tate to the accused and to the
Court+ .he Prosecutor is at all times a minister of =ustice thou@h
seldom so described+ It is not the duty of the prosecutin@ counsel to
secure a con?iction nor should any prosecutor e?en feel pride or
satisfaction in the mere fact of success+ 'till less should he boast of
the percenta@e of con?ictions secured o?er a period+ .he duty of the
prosecutor as I see it is to present to the tribunal a precisely
formulated case for the Crown a@ainst the accused and to call
e?idence in support of it+ If a defence is raised incompatible with his
case he will crosseEamine dispassionately and with perfect fairness
the e?idence so called and then address the tribunal in reply if he has
the ri@ht to su@@est that his case is pro?ed+ It is not rebuff to his
presti@e if he fails to con?ince the tribunal of the prisoner’s @uilt+
-is attitude should be so ob=ecti?e that he is so far as humanly
possible indifferent to the result+ It may be ar@ued that it is for the
tribunal alone whether ma@istrate or =ury to decide @uilt or
innocenceD 8Christmas -umphreys 81966 Criminal Law Re?iew 739
875"751+
.he Law Commission of India in its 165th Report on >Code of
Criminal Procedure 1973’ 8in chapter III para 16 uoted /abu ?+ 'tate of
erala 2 1945 Cr LJ 599 8er -+C+ to the followin@ effect2
1!
LatestLaws.com
-
8/18/2019 Law Commission Report No. 197- Public Prosecutor¢s Appointments, 2006
13/39
LatestLaws.com
BPublic Prosecutors are really &inisters of Justice whose =ob is none
other than assistin@ the 'tate in the administration of =ustice+ .hey
are not representati?es of any party+ .heir =ob is to assist the Court
by placin@ before the Court all rele?ant aspects of the case+ .hey are
not there to see the innocent sent to the @allowsN they are also not
there to see the culprits escape con?ictionD
>Public Prosecutor’ is defined in some countries as a Bpublic authority
who on behalf of society and in the public interest ensures the application
of the law where the breach of the law carries a criminal sanction and who
taes into account both the ri@hts of the indi?idual and the necessary
effecti?eness of the criminal =ustice systemD+
Prosecutors ha?e duties to the 'tate to the public to the Court and to
the accused and therefore they ha?e to be fair and ob=ecti?e while
dischar@in@ their duties+
Public Prosecutor has to act independently from the Police2
.he >independence’ of the prosecutor’s function stands at the heart of
the rule of law+ Prosecutors are eEpected to beha?e impartially+ 8Report
of the Criminal Justice Re?iew in (orthern Ireland !""" Prosecutors are
@ateeepers to the criminal =ustice process as stated by A?ory J in R ?+
/ans 191# 8! / #!1+ .he learned Jud@e stated that the prosecutor
13
LatestLaws.com
-
8/18/2019 Law Commission Report No. 197- Public Prosecutor¢s Appointments, 2006
14/39
LatestLaws.com
Bthrou@hout a case ou@ht not to stru@@le for the ?erdict a@ainst the
prisoner butM ou@ht to bear themsel?es rather in the character of
minister of =ustice assistin@ the administration of =usticeD
It is now too wellsettled that Prosecutors are independent of the
police and the Courts+ $hile the police the Courts and the prosecutors
ha?e responsibilities to each other each also has le@al duties that separate
them from others+ .he prosecutor does not direct police in?esti@ations nor
does he ad?ise the police+ Public Prosecutors are part of the =udicial
process and are considered to be officers of the Court+
Public Prosecutor must act on his own independent of 0Eecuti?e influence2
.he ,o?ernment should ensure that public prosecutors are
independent of the eEecuti?e and are able to perform their professional
duties and responsibilities without interference or un=ustified eEposure to
ci?il penal or other liability+ -owe?er the public prosecutor should
account periodically and publicly for his official acti?ities as a whole+
Public prosecutors must be in a position to prosecute without influence or
obstruction by the eEecuti?e or public officials for offences committed by
such persons particularly corruption misuse of power ?iolations of human
ri@hts etc+
0?en in re@ard to withdrawal of prosecutions under sec+ 3!1 of the
Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 the 'upreme Court has pointed out in
/al?ant 'in@h ?+ 'tate of /ihar2 AIR 1977 'C !!#6 that it is the statutory
responsibility of the public prosecutor alone to apply his mind and decide
15
LatestLaws.com
-
8/18/2019 Law Commission Report No. 197- Public Prosecutor¢s Appointments, 2006
15/39
LatestLaws.com
about withdrawal of prosecution and this power is nonne@otiable and
cannot be bartered away in fa?our of those who may be abo?e him on the
administrati?e side+ In 'ubhash Chander ?+ 'tate 8AIR 194" 'C 5!3 the
'upreme Court stated that it is the public prosecutor alone and not any other
eEecuti?e authority that decides withdrawal of prosecution+ Consent will be
@i?en by the Public Prosecutor only if public =ustice in the lar@er sense is
promoted rather than sub?erted by such withdrawal+ In doin@ so he acts as
a limb of the =udicial process and not as an eEtension of the eEecuti?e+ -e
has to decide about withdrawal by himself e?en where displeasure may
affect his continuance in office+ (one can compel him to withdraw a case+
.he public prosecutor is an officer of the Court and is responsible to the
Court+ .hese principles were reaffirmed by the Constitution /ench in the
second case @oin@ by the citation 'heonandan Paswan ?+ 'tate of /ihar2
AIR 1947 'C 477+
Public Prosecutor not to in?ol?e himself in in?esti@ation of the case2
.he Public Prosecutor should not be in?ol?ed in the in?esti@ation
process+ As held by the 'upreme Court in R+ 'arala ?+ .+'+ elu2 AIR !"""
'C 1731 Bin?esti@ation and prosecution are two different facets in the
administration of criminal =ustice+ .he Role of the public prosecutor is
inside the Court whereas the role of in?esti@ation is outside the Court+
(ormally the role of the public prosecutor commences after in?esti@ation
a@ency presents the case in the Court on the culmination of in?esti@ation+
In?ol?in@ the public prosecutor in in?esti@ation is un=udicious as well as
pernicious in lawM++ .he In?esti@ation %fficer cannot be directed to
consult the public prosecutor and submit a char@esheet in tune with the
16
LatestLaws.com
-
8/18/2019 Law Commission Report No. 197- Public Prosecutor¢s Appointments, 2006
16/39
LatestLaws.com
opinion of the public prosecutorM+ Public prosecutor is appointed for
conductin@ any prosecution appeal or proceedin@s in the Court+ -e is an
officer of the Court+ .he public prosecutor is to deal with a different field
in the administration of =ustice and cannot be in?ol?ed in in?esti@ationD+
'ummary2
.herefore the Public Prosecutor has to be independent of the
eEecuti?e and all eEternal influences also independent of the police and the
in?esti@ation process+ -e cannot ad?ice the police in the matters relatin@ to
in?esti@ation+ -e is independent of 0Eecuti?e interference+ -e is
independent from the Court but has duties to the Court+ -e is in char@e of
the trial appeal and other processes in Court+ -e is in fact a limb of the
=udicial process officer of Court and a minister of =ustice assistin@ the
Court+ -e has duties not only to the 'tate and to the public to brin@
criminals to =ustice accordin@ to the rule of law but also duties to the
accused so that innocent persons are not con?icted+
.herefore any scheme of appointment of PPs
-
8/18/2019 Law Commission Report No. 197- Public Prosecutor¢s Appointments, 2006
17/39
LatestLaws.com
Chapter III
,o?ernment of India and 'tates2 Le@islation and procedure for
appointment of Public Prosecutors and Art+ 15
$e now come to the uestion of le@islati?e power and its dimensions
and Art+ 15 of the Constitution of India+ %ur proposals are intended to
pro?ide a scheme of appointment of PPs
-
8/18/2019 Law Commission Report No. 197- Public Prosecutor¢s Appointments, 2006
18/39
LatestLaws.com
.herefore under Art+ !5#8! it is open to the Parliament to le@islate
on the sub=ect of appointment of Public Prosecutors but it is also open to the
'tate Le@islatures to amend Parliamentary le@islation by followin@ the
procedure in Art+ !658! of the Constitution by reser?in@ the 'tate
Amendment /ill for the assent of the President of India+
Law re@ardin@ appointment of Public Prosecutor will ?iolate Art+ 15 if it permits arbitrary appointment without proper checs2
.he pro?ision in sec+ !585 that the *istrict &a@istrate must consult
the 'essions Jud@e in the matter of preparation of a panel of lawyers for
appointment as Pubic Prosecutors or Addl+ Public Prosecutors is an
essential chec on arbitrary appointments+ .he 'essions Jud@e who has
nowled@e of the caliber eEperience and character of lawyers practisin@ in
the 'essions Courts is well suited to su@@est the best names of lawyers so
that the interests of prosecution the interests of the accused are fully taencare of+ .his bein@ the lo@ic behind the pro?ision for consultation any
amendment by the 'tates deletin@ the chec on arbitrary appointments of
Public Prosecutors will be ?iolati?e of Art+ 15 of the Constitution+
.he fundamental point which has to be remembered ; is that any
law made by the Centre or 'tate Le@islature in re@ard to appointment of
Public Prosecutors must conform to the principles @o?ernin@ administration
of criminal =ustice in which the public prosecutor has an independent and
special role as stated in Chapter II + In as much as the Public Prosecutor is
a >limb of the =udicial process’ and >an officer of Court’ as stated by the
14
LatestLaws.com
-
8/18/2019 Law Commission Report No. 197- Public Prosecutor¢s Appointments, 2006
19/39
LatestLaws.com
'upreme Court 8see Chapter II any method of appointment which
sacrifices the uality of the prosecution or which enables 'tate
,o?ernments to mae appointments at their choice without proper
screenin@ proper assessment of the ualifications eEperience or inte@rity of
the indi?iduals be they the Public Prosecutors selected from the /ar or
appointed from amon@ the Prosecutin@ %fficers will not stand the test of
nonarbitrariness under Art+ 15 of the Constitution of India+ .he scheme
must pro?ide for appointin@ Public Prosecutors who shall bear all the
ualities mentioned in Chapter II+
As pointed by the 'upreme Court Public Prosecutor’s functions are
inside the Criminal Courts+ PPs
-
8/18/2019 Law Commission Report No. 197- Public Prosecutor¢s Appointments, 2006
20/39
LatestLaws.com
ad?ertin@ to the then eEistin@ procedures of appointin@ Police Prosecutors
as Public Prosecutors as follows2
B1!+ Public Prosecutors and their functions2 It is ob?ious that by the
?ery fact of their bein@ members of the police force and the nature of
the duties they ha?e to dischar@e in brin@in@ a case in Court it is not
possible for them to eEhibit that de@ree of detachment which is
necessary in a prosecutor+ It is to be remembered that a belief
pre?ails amon@st the police officers that their promotion in the
*epartment depends upon the number of con?ictions they are able to
obtain as prosecutin@ officers+ )inally the only control or
super?ision of the wor of these prosecutin@ officers is that eEercised
by the *epartmental officialsD
.he remedial measures su@@ested were as follows 8para 162
B'u@@ested remedial measure2 $e therefore su@@est that as a first
step towards impro?ement the prosecutin@ a@ency should be
completely separated from the Police *epartment+ In e?ery district
a separate Prosecution *epartment may be constituted and placed in
char@e of an official who may be called a >*irector of Public
Prosecutors’+ .he entire prosecution machinery in the *istrict
should be under his control+ In order to ensure that he is not
re@arded as a part of the Police *epartment he should be an
independent official directly responsible to the 'tate ,o?ernment+
.he departments of the machinery of criminal =ustice namely the
!"
LatestLaws.com
-
8/18/2019 Law Commission Report No. 197- Public Prosecutor¢s Appointments, 2006
21/39
LatestLaws.com
In?esti@ation *epartment and the Prosecutin@ *epartment should
thus be completely separated from each otherD
.here ha?e also been recommendations by the (ational Police
Commission in its 5th Report and also in the 165th Report of the Law
Commission 8199# that there should be a prosecution system under the
control of an independent *irector of Prosecution+
'upreme Court in '+/+ 'hahane’s case 819962 Public Prosecutors must beindependent of the Police2
In '+/+ 'hahane ?+ 'tate of &aharashtra 1996 'uppl+ 83 'CC 37 the
Police Prosecutors functionin@ under the control of the I, of Police were
appointed as Asst+ Public Prosecutors by a notification issued under sec+ !6
of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973+ .he 'upreme Court held that
such Asst+ Public Prosecutors could not be allowed to function under the
control of the head of the Police *epartment+ .he 'tate ,o?ernment wasdirected to constitute a separate cadre of Asst+ Public Prosecutors by
creatin@ a separate Prosecution *epartment+ A Police Prosecutor it was
held was not eli@ible for bein@ appointed as Asst+ Public Prosecutor
because the Public Prosecutor must be independent of the Police+
$ithout a cadre of prosecutin@ officers in eEistence appointment of Asst+
Public Prosecutors as PPs
-
8/18/2019 Law Commission Report No. 197- Public Prosecutor¢s Appointments, 2006
22/39
LatestLaws.com
Addl+ Public Prosecutor Asst+ Public Prosecutor or other Prosecutin@
%fficers and unless such a cadre is a?ailable prosecutin@ officers who are
not part of such a cadre cannot be appointed as PPs
-
8/18/2019 Law Commission Report No. 197- Public Prosecutor¢s Appointments, 2006
23/39
LatestLaws.com
the 'essions Court so that they can be efficient in their functionin@
ob=ecti?e and independent of the Police and the 0Eecuti?e+ Any scheme of
appointments without proper checs will be ?iolati?e of Art+ 15 of the
Constitution of India+
If the central le@islation eEpressly reuires consultation with 'essions
Jud@e and that he should assess merit eEperience and @ood character as a
necessary condition for appointment as Public Prosecutors under sec+ !585
then any 'tate Amendment which deletes the pro?ision relatin@ to
consultation with the 'essions Jud@e and to the abo?e ualities reuired of
the appointee then such deletion by the 'tate Le@islature amounts @i?in@ a
licence for arbitrary appointments and will ?iolate Art+ 15+ In such cases
assent of the President to the 'tate Amendment can be =ustifiably refused+
!3
LatestLaws.com
-
8/18/2019 Law Commission Report No. 197- Public Prosecutor¢s Appointments, 2006
24/39
LatestLaws.com
Chapter I
Recommendations of Law Commission on the three su@@estions of P&%
81 Making of appointment of Public Prosecutors/ Additional Public
Prosecutors only from amongst persons constituting regular
Cadre of Prosecuting fficers ! in terms of s. 2"#$% of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, &'() #sic &'*+%, as originally legislated by
Parliament may need to be legislati-ely restored to o-erride
-arious tate Amendments. urther, a time limit may need to be
prescribed by la0 to re1uire creation of such cadres in a definite
timeframe, 0hile simultaneously incorporating a sunset clause3
in s. 2"#"% of the Cr.P.C.
.his su@@estion (o+1 can be split into two parts+
8a Ouestion is whether the 'tate Le@islatures can be precluded from
amendin@ sec+ !58# so as to disable the 'tates from main@ amendments
permittin@ appointments as Public Prosecutors and Addl+ Public Prosecutors
from outside the cadre of Asst+ Public Prosecutors
It is ob?ious that ha?in@ re@ard to the fact that the sub=ect of >criminal
procedure’ is in 0ntry (o+! of the Concurrent List 8List III of the II'chedule to the Constitution of India 'tate Amendments to the Central
enactment cannot be pre?ented+ In ?iew of Art+ !658! the 'tate
Amendments will pre?ail o?er Parliamentary le@islation if the President
@i?es assent to the 'tate Amendments+ 0?en if any new amendments to sec+
!5
LatestLaws.com
-
8/18/2019 Law Commission Report No. 197- Public Prosecutor¢s Appointments, 2006
25/39
LatestLaws.com
!58# are made by Parliament in mandatory lan@ua@e it will not preclude
the 'tate Le@islatures from amendin@ sec+ !58# and main@ it discretionary
to appoint from outside the Re@ular Cadre of prosecutin@ officers and
seein@ assent of the President of India for such further amendment+
/ut this problem can be sol?ed in a different way and pro?idin@ a
scheme in the Central Act which will be in conformity with Art+ 15 of the
Constitution of India and in that e?ent de?iations by the 'tates from that
scheme will be in ?iolation of Art+ 15+ $e are su@@estin@ such a scheme
consistent with Art+ 15 in our discussion under su@@estion 83+
8b $hether the pro?isions of sec+ !58# which permit only Asst+ PublicProsecutors in the Re@ular Cadre of Prosecutin@ %fficers to be appointed asPPs
-
8/18/2019 Law Commission Report No. 197- Public Prosecutor¢s Appointments, 2006
26/39
LatestLaws.com
Public Prosecutors
-
8/18/2019 Law Commission Report No. 197- Public Prosecutor¢s Appointments, 2006
27/39
LatestLaws.com
Prosecutor+ In fact it is absolutely necessary to appoint them to some of
these posts and mae use of their ?ast eEperience in handlin@ cases triable
by a 'essions Court+ A pro?ision which combines appointment of Asst+
Public Prosecutors who ha?e been appearin@ for the prosecution for a lar@e
number of years in the &a@istrates Courts and of practitioners with
sufficient eEperience who ha?e been appearin@ for the defence in 'essions
Courts should mae a ?ery fine combination and ser?e public interest+
'ome of these lawyers in the 'essions Courts mi@ht ha?e indeed been
Public Prosecutors earlier in those 'essions Courts+ .he 'essions Court
must ha?e the benefit of eEperience of persons from both sources+ .he
Public Prosecutors appointed from amon@ Asst+ Public Prosecutors can
benefit by interactin@ with the Public Prosecutors appointed from the /ar in
consultation with the 'essions Jud@e and ?ice?ersa+ .he prosecution
process will @et @reater stren@th and efficiency on account of the ?aried but
different eEperience of the persons from the two sources+ %f the efficacy
of this scheme and the @ood results that may flow from this scheme the
Commission has no doubts whatsoe?er+
.he Law Commission does not therefore fa?our an eEclusi?e or
sin@le source namely the source of Asst+ Public Prosecutors who ha?e as
on date of appointment to the hi@her post not handled any 'essions cases
where hi@her staes are in?ol?ed+ It is not in the interests of the criminal
=udicial system that all the Public Prosecutors and Addl+ Public Prosecutors
must be manned only from the source of Asst+ Public Prosecutors+ .hose
appointed from the cadre of Ast+ Public Prosecutors will tae considerable
time to @ain eEperience in dealin@ with cases which come for trial before the
'essions Court+ It will not therefore be in the interests of the prosecution
!7
LatestLaws.com
-
8/18/2019 Law Commission Report No. 197- Public Prosecutor¢s Appointments, 2006
28/39
LatestLaws.com
or in public interest to eEclude lawyers who ha?e been handlin@ 'essions
cases o?er a lon@ period+
In fact the 'tate Le@islatures in the opinion of the Law Commission
are fully =ustified in @oin@ for a combination of recruitment from both
sources recruitees from the /ar for 3 years each time and from amon@
Asst+ Public Prosecutors+ .he ?iew eEpressed in the first su@@estion that all
posts of Public Prosecutors and Addl+ Public Prosecutors must be filled only
by officers from the source of Asst+ Public Prosecutors where?er a cadre is
a?ailable has ob?iously not taen the abo?e aspects into consideration
which from a practical point of ?iew is in the o?erall interests of the
prosecution and in public interest+
%ne other important recommendation of ours is that the post of Public
Prosecutor in the district must be filled only by the person selected under
sec+ !585 from the panel of lawyers prepared by the *istrict &a@istrate in
consultation with the 'essions Jud@e+ It will be in the interests of the
criminal =ustice process if the principal post in the district in this behalf
namely the post of Public Prosecutor is manned by an Ad?ocate selected on
the recommendation of the 'essions Jud@e+
$ith a ?iew to combine both sources we are of the ?iew that the
posts of Addl+ Public Prosecutor must be a?ailable to the /ar and the Asst+
Public Prosecutors in the ratio of 6"F 2 6"F+
/ut there is a ca?eat in re@ard to the procedure for appointment
which we shall discuss under 83+
!4
LatestLaws.com
-
8/18/2019 Law Commission Report No. 197- Public Prosecutor¢s Appointments, 2006
29/39
LatestLaws.com
8! 4hether re1uirement of consultation 0ith essions 5udge under
sec. 2"#"% may need to be restored to o-erride tate Amendments6
.here is no doubt that consultation process with the 'essions Jud@e
must be restored so far as sec+ !585 is concerned+
$e note that certain 'tates ha?e dispensed with consultation with the
'essions Jud@e by amendin@ sec+ !585+ $e a@ree with the P&% that this
has to be pre?ented or put an end to+
/ut as stated earlier while reiteration by a fresh Parliamentary law
can be made such reiteration cannot sol?e the problem in ?iew of the
powers of 'tate Le@islatures unless we introduce some pro?isions which are
consistent with Art+ 15 so that in case they are deleted by the 'tates such
deletions can be attaced as bein@ in ?iolation of Art+ 15+
In order to preclude arbitrary 'tate Amendments we therefore
propose to brin@ in a hi@her constitutional principle to compel a fair
transparent procedure of appointment to be followed+ %nce such a
procedure is introduced into sec+ !5 by Parliament then whene?er the 'tates
do away with such a procedure that will clearly attract Art+ 15+ 'tates
cannot mae a pro?ision which is arbitrary and which permits them to
appoint Public Prosecutors or Addl+ Public Prosecutors at their sweet will or
whomsoe?er they lie or on political considerations+
!9
LatestLaws.com
-
8/18/2019 Law Commission Report No. 197- Public Prosecutor¢s Appointments, 2006
30/39
LatestLaws.com
$e shall eEplain this new scheme in detail when we come to
su@@estion (o+83+
83 7nstitutional mechanisms and safeguards like eligibility,
assessment of past performance, ade1uate tenure etc. should be
considered for pre-enting arbitrariness in appointments8
In the conteEt of this su@@estion we shall refer to the new scheme
which we propose+
As stated earlier the Public Prosecutors ha?e their functions inside
the Court+ .hey cannot be in?ol?ed in the in?esti@ation process+ If their
functions are in the Court and if in fact they are limbs in the =udicial
administration and are officers of Court the method of appointment must be
such as to achie?e the ob=ects of efficient assistance to the Court brin@in@
the culprits to boo and protectin@ the innocent+ If there is a transparent
scheme co?erin@ the selection process of both the members of the /ar under
sec+ !585 and the Asst+ Public Prosecutors under sec+ !58# then such a
scheme cannot be done away with by 'tate le@islations which will then
become ?ulnerable to attac under Art+ 15+
.he appointment of Asst+ Public Prosecutors to the hi@her post as
well as the appointment directly from the /ar for 3 years must always
satisfy basic reuirements of nowled@e eEperience and inte@rity+ As
stated earlier the 'essions Jud@e has the ad?anta@e of nowin@ who is @ood
at the /ar in all these respects practisin@ in the 'essions Courts+
3"
LatestLaws.com
-
8/18/2019 Law Commission Report No. 197- Public Prosecutor¢s Appointments, 2006
31/39
LatestLaws.com
In the abo?e bac@round the constitutional principles mentioned by
the Commission in Chapters II and III are of @reat rele?ance and will curtail
'tate Amendments which may permit arbitrary appointments+ .he Public
Prosecutor bein@ part of the =udicial process bein@ a limb in the =udicial
administration bein@ an officer of the Court we must ha?e a procedure
which includes the safe@uards lie the consultation process for purposes of
sec+ !585 and the appointment procedure for purposes of sec+ !58# to
eEclude arbitrary appointments or appointment of persons not competent or
not bearin@ @ood character+
'ection !5852
$e may reiterate that so far as sec+ !585 is concerned the Public
Prosecutor’s selection and appointment at the le?el of the *istricts and the
-i@h Court cannot be left to the sweet will of the ,o?ernment+ 'uch a
procedure has the dan@er of persons without adeuate eEperience of
conductin@ 'essions cases or who lac in adeuate nowled@e of criminal
law bein@ appointed+ .here is e?en the lielihood of some of such
appointees not maintainin@ the hi@hest standards of conduct eEpected of a
Public Prosecutor+ .hus while consultation under sec+ !585 with the
'essions Jud@e cannot be dispensed with we propose some eEtra pro?isions
in sec+ !585 reuirin@ that the 'ession Jud@e must @i?e importance to
eEperience in 'essions cases merit and inte@rity+ If such a pro?ision is
dispensed with by 'tate Le@islatures ob?iously such amendments will
?iolate Art+ 15+ .his is so far as the posts of Public Prosecutor and 6"F of
posts of Addl+ Public Prosecutor in the *istrict are concerned+
31
LatestLaws.com
-
8/18/2019 Law Commission Report No. 197- Public Prosecutor¢s Appointments, 2006
32/39
LatestLaws.com
'ection !58#2
0?en in re@ard to those who are to be appointed under sec+ !58# from
the posts of Asst+ Public Prosecutors who are in the Re@ular Cadre they
should not be appointed =ust on the basis of seniority or suitability unless
screened by a 'tate Le?el Committee+ In as much the cadre is 'tatewide it
is desirable that a panel is prepared by a 'tate Le?el Committee from amon@
the Asst+ Public Prosecutors of the 'tate for purposes of such appointment+
.he 'tate le?el Committee must in our opinion consist of
8a a sittin@ or retired Jud@e of the -i@h Court nominated by the
Chief Justice of the -i@h Court of the 'tate
8b the Law 'ecretary of the 'tate 8or officer of eui?alent post by
whate?er name called
8c an officer of the 'tate ,o?t+ not below the ran of 'ecretary to
'tate ,o?ernment
8d the *irector of Prosecution if any+
.he Committee must eEpressly be reuired to assess the merit
inte@rity past record of performance etc+ before empanellin@ the Asst+
Public Prosecutors for appointment to the 6"F posts of Addl+ Public
Prosecutors in the *istrict+
%ne other important su@@estion of ours as stated earlier is that the
Public Prosecutor in the 'essions Court must always be from the /ar and
there should be 6"F 2 6"F ratio as between appointments made from
3!
LatestLaws.com
-
8/18/2019 Law Commission Report No. 197- Public Prosecutor¢s Appointments, 2006
33/39
LatestLaws.com
amon@ the members of the /ar practisin@ in the 'essions Court as submitted
by the *istrict &a@istrate under sec+ !585 and those from the panel
prepared by the Committee for mannin@ the 6"F posts of Addl+ Public
Prosecutor in the *istrict for purposes of sec+ !58#+ .he 6"F from the
panel of Asst+ Public Prosecutors prepared by the Committee will be eli@ible
only for the posts of Addl+ Public Prosecutor and not for the post of Public
Prosecutor+
.he Law Commission is therefore of the followin@ opinion ; in
respect of the three su@@estions2
8i that ha?in@ re@ard to the le@islati?e competence of the 'tate
Le@islatures and Art+ !658! of the Constitution of India it is not
possible to pre?ent the 'tate Le@islatures from amendin@ ss+ !585
and !58# of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 and seein@
assent of the President for such amendmentN
8ii that the procedure of fillin@ posts of Public Prosecutors and Addl+
Public Prosecutors in the 'essions Court 8on contract basis for 3
years each time under sec+ !585 from amon@ members of the /ar
who ha?e had eEperience in conductin@ 'essions cases is more in
the interests of the prosecution system and in public interest+ .he
law must eEpressly pro?ide that the 'essions Jud@e must @i?e
wei@ht to eEperience in conductin@ 'essions cases and to @ood
character while selectin@ members of the /ar+
8iii that eEcludin@ members of the /ar who are eEperienced in
conductin@ 'essions cases and eEclusi?ely appointin@ Asst+ Public
Prosecutors ; who ha?e been conductin@ prosecution in
33
LatestLaws.com
-
8/18/2019 Law Commission Report No. 197- Public Prosecutor¢s Appointments, 2006
34/39
LatestLaws.com
&a@istrates’ Courts in relation to less serious offences to these
hi@her posts as now pro?ided by sec+ !58# is not a beneficial
scheme at allN
8i? that a combination of appointments from 8a amon@ Asst+ Public
Prosecutors belon@in@ to the cadre of prosecutin@ officers with a
lon@ period of ser?ice and 8b of direct recruitment on contract
basis from the /ar from amon@ those who ha?e conducted
'essions cases is necessary and will be a fair and efficient
prosecution system+ .he ratio between the two sources to the
posts of Addl+ Public Prosecutor must be 6"F to 6"FN
8? that the post of Public Prosecutor in the *istrict must always be
manned by a member of the /ar who has been empanelled by the
*istrict &a@istrate in consultation with the 'essions Jud@eN
8?i that it must be ensured that those Asst+ Public Prosecutors
empanelled for appointment to the posts of Addl+ Public
Prosecutors are properly screened by way of an inter?iew by a
'tate le?el Committee consistin@ of a retired -i@h Court Jud@e or
a sittin@ -i@h Court Jud@e nominated by the Chief Justice of the
-i@h Court of the 'tate and 'ecretary to 'tate ,o?ernment the
Law 'ecretary and the *irector of ProsecutionN
8?ii that any amendment by the 'tates which dispenses with the
safe@uards of inter?iew for appointments from the cadre or which
dispenses with consultation with the 'essions Jud@e in the matter
of selectin@ efficient persons from the /ar on contract basis will
amount to arbitrary eEercise of power and will be ?iolati?e of Art+
15 of the Constitution of India+ .he fact that 'tate Le@islatures
can amend sec+ !585 does not mean that they can introduce a
35
LatestLaws.com
-
8/18/2019 Law Commission Report No. 197- Public Prosecutor¢s Appointments, 2006
35/39
LatestLaws.com
procedure for main@ appointments arbitrarily from the /ar
without a proper selection process consistin@ of adeuate checs
a@ainst arbitrariness+ .he Public Prosecutor bein@ a person with
hu@e responsibilities in the criminal =ustice system and he bein@
part of the =udicial process only if the methods of recruitment
su@@ested abo?e are followed it can ensure an effecti?e system
otherwise it will be ?iolati?e of Art+ 15N
8?iii that so far as appointees from the cadre are concerned as stated
abo?e any recruitment throu@h the 'tate Public 'er?ice
Commission will lead to abnormal delays and the posts lyin@
?acant for lon@ periods+ -ence it is ad?isable to ha?e a 'tate
Le?el Committee as su@@ested abo?e+
8iE that so far as fiEin@ a time limit for constitutin@ a Cadre of
Prosecutin@ %fficers is concerned namely 8a the Asst+ Public
Prosecutors in the 'tate and 8b the 6"F posts of Addl+ Public
Prosecutors in each *istrict we propose to fiE a period of siE
months for the 'tates to constitute such a re@ular Cadre+ .he siE
months period will be counted from the date of commencement of
the proposed Criminal Procedure 8Amendment Act+
/efore partin@ we are also of the ?iew that appointment of Pubic
Prosecutors and Addl+ Public Prosecutors in the -i@h Court under sec+ !581
by dispensin@ with consultation with the -i@h Court is clearly ?iolati?e of
Art+ 15 as it not only permits arbitrary appointments but eEcludes the
consultation with the -i@h Court in the matter of appointment of these
officers which is crucial+
36
LatestLaws.com
-
8/18/2019 Law Commission Report No. 197- Public Prosecutor¢s Appointments, 2006
36/39
LatestLaws.com
Just as the pro?ision for consultation of the Chief Justice of a -i@h
Court in the matter of appointment of Jud@es of the -i@h Court is
mandatory on the same analo@y sec+ !581 is of hi@hest importance thou@h
it is not a constitutional pro?ision+ Absence of consultation process with
the -i@h Court will in our opinion clearly ?iolate Art+ 15 of the
Constitution+
$e are also enclosin@ a *raft /ill for substitution of sec+ !585 to 8#
by Parliament+
$e recommend accordin@ly+
8Justice &+ Ja@annadha RaoChairman
8R+L+ &eenaiceChairman
8*r+ *+P+ 'harma&ember'ecretary
*ated2 31st July !""#
3#
LatestLaws.com
-
8/18/2019 Law Commission Report No. 197- Public Prosecutor¢s Appointments, 2006
37/39
LatestLaws.com
A((0HR0
*raft Amendment to subsections 85 to 8# of sec+ !5 of Code of Criminal
Procedure 1973 in supersession of all amendments includin@ amendments
by the Criminal Procedure 8Amendment Act !""62
'ubsections 85 to 8# of sec+ !5 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
1973 shall be substituted by the followin@2
B85 .he *istrict &a@istrate shall in consultation with the 'essions Jud@e
prepare a panel of names of persons who are in his opinion fit to be
appointed as Pubic Prosecutor or Addl+ Public Prosecutor
pro?ided that the 'essions Jud@e shall recommend only such
names from amon@ the ad?ocates practisin@ in the 'essions Court or
Addl+ 'essions Courts who ha?e personally conducted substantial
number of 'essions cases and who bear @ood character+
86 (o person shall be appointed by the 'tate ,o?ernment as Public
Prosecutor and sub=ect to the pro?isions of subsection 8# as Addl+
Public Prosecutor for the *istrict unless his name appears in the
panel of names prepared by the *istrict &a@istrate under subsection
85+
8# )ifty percent of the posts of Addl+ Public Prosecutor in a *istrict shall
be filled out of the panel prepared under subsection 8#/ from the
cadre referred to in subsection 8#A and the remainin@ fifty percent
37
LatestLaws.com
-
8/18/2019 Law Commission Report No. 197- Public Prosecutor¢s Appointments, 2006
38/39
LatestLaws.com
posts of Addl+ Public Prosecutor in a *istrict shall be filled out of the
panel prepared under subsection 85+
pro?ided that where in the opinion of 'election Committee
referred to in subsection 8#/ no suitable person is a?ailable in the
cadre for the appointment to the post of Addl+ Public Prosecutor the
'tate ,o?ernment may appoint any person on the post of Addl+ Public
Prosecutor from the panel of names prepared by the *istrict
&a@istrate in subsection 85+
8#A .he 'tate ,o?ernments shall within siE months from the date of
commencement of the Code of Criminal Procedure 8Amendment
Act !""# constitute a cadre of Re@ular Prosecutin@ %fficers
consistin@ of fifty percent of posts of Addl+ Public Prosecutor in each
*istrict and the total number of posts of Asst+ Public Prosecutors in
the 'tate+
8#/81 )or the purpose of selection of Asst+ Public Prosecutors to be
appointed to fifty percent of the posts of Addl+ Public Prosecutor
referred to in subsection 8# the 'tate ,o?ernment shall constitute a
'tate Le?el Committee consistin@ of
8a a sittin@ Jud@e or a retired Jud@e of the -i@h Court of the 'tate
nominated by the Chief Justice of the -i@h Court of that 'tate
8ban officer of the ran of 'ecretary to the 'tate ,o?ernment
8c the 'ecretary Law *epartment of the 'tate or the officer holdin@
eui?alent post by whate?er name called and
8dthe *irector of Prosecution if any+
34
LatestLaws.com
-
8/18/2019 Law Commission Report No. 197- Public Prosecutor¢s Appointments, 2006
39/39
LatestLaws.com
8! .he Committee shall from time to time prepare a panel of Asst+
Public Prosecutors from the Re@ular Cadre of Prosecutin@ %fficers
fit to be appointed as Addl+ Public Prosecutor and for the purpose of
=ud@in@ their fitness assess their merit eEperience their pre?ious
record of performance and ensure that they are persons bearin@ @ood
character+D
LatestLaws.com