1. The Last Responders Earthquake Preparedness for UW StudentsEric Chen | Mike Northcutt | Pratham Parikh | Ruben Rios | Shufan Wen

2. 1 Design Question 3. 1Design Question How can technology be used to better prepare UW students for a catastrophic earthquake?Originally too broad Preparation defined as: 1. knowing what to do 2. having supplies 4. 2 User Research: Methods & Findings 5. 2Methods Literature and web review -Existing sites, data, tools?Survey -Primary data, 40 participants Motivations, beliefs, preparedness, preferred solution(s)Interviews -Checking for consistencyContextual inquiry 6. 2Findings Users needed: -Supplies (generally not prepared) Education (generally didnt know what to do) Motivation through factsUsers wanted: -Website (preferred by majority) Simple & quick solutionsDont make a website like this 7. 2 8. 3 Personas 9. 3Personas Process 3 personas -Typical Tommy (Primary) Low motivation & low preparedness-Busy Barbara (Secondary) Medium-high motivation & low preparedness-Prepared Peter (Secondary) High motivation & high preparedness 10. 3Development of Personas We came up with three personas -Typical Tommy (Primary) Busy Barbara (Secondary) Prepared Peter (Secondary) 11. 3Primary Persona We came up with three personas -Typical Tommy (Primary) Busy Barbara (Secondary) Prepared Peter (Secondary) 12. 3Secondary Persona We came up with three personas -Typical Tommy (Primary) Busy Barbara (Secondary) Prepared Peter (Secondary) 13. 3Secondary Persona We came up with three personas -Typical Tommy (Primary) Busy Barbara (Secondary) Prepared Peter (Secondary) 14. 4 Ideation/Sketching 15. Ideation/Sketching 16. Ideation/Sketching 17. 5 Wireframes 18. Wireframes 19. 6 Prototype Iterations 20. 6Paper Prototyping 21. 6Paper Prototyping 22. 6Axure Prototype: Homepage 23. 6Axure Prototype: What to Do 24. 6Axure Prototype: Customized Kits 25. 6Axure Prototype: Recommended Kits 26. 7 Usability Testing 27. 7Usability Testing Conducted usability testing with 3 participants 28. Here is a video of our Usability testing Conducted usability testing with 3 participants 29. 7Axure Prototype: What to Do 30. 7Axure Prototype: Customized Kits 31. 8 Demo 32. 8Final Prototype FeaturesImproved facts carousel Better customization tool Better navigation Deeper resources section Improved GraphicsVersion 2.1.8 http://share.axure.com/CACQWL (no password) 33. 9 Reflections & Future 34. 9Lessons Learned Low-fidelity prototypes can be limited Users explored the site differently from our expectation 35. 9What We Would Do Differently? Better survey (pilot testing, better wording, better questions, etc.) 6-point Likert scale on survey responses Larger study groups 36. 9Future Features? Single page design with parallax scrolling Additional customization of kits Integration with other tools (e.g. personal organizers & shopping lists) More location-specific resources content Additional motivational features (gamification?) 37. 10 Questions 38. 10Thank You Last Reponders are: -Eric, Mike, Pratham, Ruben, & Shu-Fan 39. Appendix 40. Appendix (Credits) Graphics, facts and various content, courtesy of the web Home page facts, in order of appearance: -"Big earthquake coming sooner than we thought -The Cascadia subduction zone can produce very large earthquakes ("megathrust earthquakes"), magnitude 9.0 or greater -The Oregonian. 2009-04-19A major earthquake can damage infrastructure "wikipediaSome geologists are predicting 10% to 14% -The Oregonian. 2009-04-19Just plain common sense!Home page images, in order of appearance: -Viaduct 3d Model Cascadia Subduction Zone fault diagram Earthquake, Alaska, 1964 Earthquake, Oakland, 1989 (also used for this PPT Title Slide graphic) 41. Appendix(Persona Development)Best Guess dimensions: Universe: UW students who are not fully prepared for an earthquakeDefinition criteria: Preparedness and motivationKey dimensions: -Has a plan vs. doesnt have a plan Has supplies/provisions vs. does not Knows what to do and how to prepare vs. does not Believes theyre prepared vs. doesnt believe so Personal experience with earthquakes vs. none Has kids or does not Married vs. singleRuled-out dimensions (insignificant): -Believes an earthquake is likely vs. does not think so 42. Appendix(Gallery) 43. Appendix(Gallery) 44. Appendix(Link to Prototype)http://share.axure.com/CACQWL (no password)