Laser-engineered topography: correlation between structure dimensions and cell control
-
Upload
elena-fadeeva -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of Laser-engineered topography: correlation between structure dimensions and cell control
Laser-engineered topography: correlation between structuredimensions and cell control
Sabrina Schlie • Elena Fadeeva • Anastasia Koroleva •
Boris N. Chichkov
Received: 27 February 2012 / Accepted: 27 July 2012 / Published online: 10 August 2012
� Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012
Abstract Topographical cues have a significant impact on
cell responses and by this means, on the fabrication of
innovative implant materials. However, analysis of cell-
topography interactions in dependence of the surface feature
dimensions is still challenging due to limitations in the fab-
rication technology. Here, we introduce surface structuring
via picosecond laser systems, which enable a fast production
of micro-sized topologies. Changes in the processing
parameters further control the feature sizes of so-called
spikes. Using surfaces with big and small spike-to-spike-
distances for comparisons, we focussed on cell adhesion via
extracellular matrix adsorption and focal adhesion com-
plexes, morphology, localisation and proliferation of fibro-
blasts. The observed cell control was dependent on a
turnover point related to the structure dimensions: only big
spike-to-spike-distances reduced cell behaviour. Therefore,
this technology offers a platform to study cell and tissue
interactions with a defined microenvironment.
1 Introduction
The natural environment of cells consists of a defined
architecture of the extracellular matrix and neighbouring
cells providing anchorage points and biochemical signals
for cell functions and survival. When implants have to
substitute tissue defects, the engineered constructs have to
copy the state of art within the tissue—otherwise tissue
regeneration and reconstruction cannot be guaranteed.
To better represent the geometry, chemistry, and signal-
ing environment, different biological, chemical, and
physical approaches have been made for material function-
alization. In the first place, a biocompatible basis material
has to be selected, which mimics the mechanical, structural,
biochemical and chemical properties the best—but which is
also applicable for functional modifications. Depending on
the biomedical application, metals, ceramics, polymers or
composites are used. However, the critical parameter of the
material is its surface, since it is crucial in controlling
interactions between cells and the substrate [1]. This inter-
action occurs in a specific order: the extracellular matrix
associates with the material surface providing ligands for cell
binding with integrin receptors. Afterwards, the formation of
focal adhesion complexes initiates signaling cascades guid-
ing proliferation, differentiation, survival and others [2].
Finding a material-processing technology, which enables the
systematic study and understanding of parameters that
govern cell behaviour, would be a huge benefit in tissue
engineering.
One of the critical surface parameter is its topography.
Many studies describe that cells recognize the topographical
features of their environment such as the fibres of the
extracellular matrix with 10 to 300 nm in diameter [3]. It has
been demonstrated that structures like groove or pits in
micro- and nanometer scale affect cell responses [4–6].
However, analysis of one type of surface feature with vari-
able dimensions is still challenging. Whereas groove-struc-
tures or pores are easier to be established in distinct scales,
the production of more complicated textures is limited by the
fabrication technology. Additional standards of the tech-
nique refer to manufacturing in a time- and cost-effective
manner. Therefore, the recent proceedings in nanotechnol-
ogy make laser-technologies very attractive for a topo-
graphical functionalization of biomaterials. In general, laser
systems offer a flexible and controllable structuring of
material surfaces. The usage of ultrashort laser-pulses
S. Schlie (&) � E. Fadeeva � A. Koroleva � B. N. Chichkov
Laser Zentrum Hannover e.V., Hollerithallee 8,
30419 Hannover, Germany
e-mail: [email protected]
123
J Mater Sci: Mater Med (2012) 23:2813–2819
DOI 10.1007/s10856-012-4737-9
further enables a better resolution and reduces heat-affected
zones. In previous studies we showed, that femtosecond
lasers can be applied for material ablation to texture the
surface of different metals such as titanium, platinum or
silicon [7, 8]. Laser-structuring of polymers is also possible;
however, ablation debris remaining on the surface may cause
cytotoxic effects, so that microreplication of laser-generated
master samples has to be used alternatively [9, 10]. In
addition we found a correlation between surface structuring
and increase in material wettability without influencing the
chemical composition of the material.
Out of all manufactured topographies, so-called spike
structures in micrometer scale were analyzed most. Con-
cerning cell interactions, such spikes even allow a selective
cell control: inhibiting fibroblasts, while stimulating neu-
roblastoma cells [9]. Since fibroblasts participate in scar
tissue formation surrounding the implanted material, their
growth inhibition is one major goal in tissue engineering
[11]. Even though the laser technologies permit the fabri-
cation spikes in silicon (Si) with different size dimensions, a
detailed study of fibroblast inhibition in dependence of the
spike sizes has not been performed so far. However, this
knowledge could be a vantage point for any other desired
biomedical application assuming that a selective cell control
depends on the provided topography. Additionally, the
interaction between the presented microtopography of a
biomaterial and extracellular matrix needed for cell attach-
ment is poorly understood. Therefore, this study shall give
an insight in the potential of laser technologies for defined
surface texturing and in a systematic analysis of tissue/cell
responses to a given microenvironment.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Surface fabrication and characterisation
Spike structures were fabricated by ablation of single-
crystal p–type Silicon (110) samples (Si) in SF6 gas
atmosphere with infrared picosecond laser pulses. In our
experiments we used a picosecond laser system Rapid
(Lumera Laser GmbH, Kaiserslautern, Germany) with
amplifier system miniVan (neoLASE GmbH, Hannover,
Germany). This system delivers 8 ps laser pulses at 1.064
nm and repetition rate up to 640 kHz by output power of
16 W. For structuring, the samples were placed in a vac-
uum chamber evacuated down to a residual pressure of
10 m Torr, and backfilled with 500 Torr SF6. A motorised
translation stage (Kugler GmbH, Salem, Germany) was
used for samples positioning and translation. To fabricate
the spike structure, the silicon surfaces were uniformly
irradiated with 500 laser pulses at laser fluences of
2.6 J/cm2 for small and 12 J/cm2 for big spikes, respectively.
Size dimensions, described by spike-to-spike distances,
were quantified by the use of ImageJ software (http://
rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/). With the help of the line selection tool,
a straight line was placed from one spike tip to another of
scanning electron microscope (SEM) images. Automati-
cally, the line length is given in pixel scale, which can be
converted into lm dimensions. The results were given as
average ± standard derivation of at least 250 different
distances of both topologies. In the following, the struc-
tures are entitled small and big spikes, respectively.
2.2 Fibronectin adsorption
To analyze fibronectin adsorption as a component of the
extracellular matrix in dependence of the spike dimensions,
the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was per-
formed. With respect to the control, a coating-concentration
dependency (5, 10, and 20 lg/cm2) was evaluated. For each
sample, the relative fluorescence intensity, which is pro-
portional to the amount of antibody-binding, was determined
as a function of ligand adsorption. All antibodies were solved
in 0.05 % Tween/phosphate buffer saline (PBS). After
30 min fibronectin coating at room temperature and washing
with PBS, the primary antibody-solution was added at 37 �C
for 1 h. Following three washing steps with PBS 5 min each,
the secondary antibody solution (anti-rabbit IgG-alkaline
phosphatase conjugated) was incubated at 37 �C for 1 h.
Before adding the substrate 4-methylumbelliferyl phosphate
for 20 min at room temperature, the samples were washed
three times with PBS 5 min each. Finally, reaction super-
natants were transferred to a black 96-well plate and fluo-
rescence (365 nm excitation/450 nm emission) was read
using multimode microplate reader Mithras LB 940 (Bert-
hold Technologies, Bad Wildbad, Germany). The back-
ground signal referred to treatment specific progression
without ligand-coating and was subtracted from the corre-
sponding intensities. For statistical reasons, the measure-
ment was repeated six times and given as average.
2.3 Cell culture and proliferation
Before use the laser-structured Si samples were sterilized
under UV light for 30 min. Glass slides served as a control.
Fibroblasts were cultivated on the different samples in a cell
incubator at 37 �C and 5 % CO2 atmosphere (Thermo
Electron Corporation, Bonn, Germany) in Dulbecco’s
Modified Eagles Medium (DMEM/F-12, Lonza, Basel,
Switzerland) supplemented with 10 % fetal calf serum and
antibiotics.
To analyze topographical effects on cell proliferation, the
cell density of fibroblasts was determined when cultivated on
small and big Si spikes in comparison to the control. Using the
cell counter Casy TT (Roche, Mannheim, Germany), the
2814 J Mater Sci: Mater Med (2012) 23:2813–2819
123
adherent cells were trypsinized, collected, centrifuged at
800 g for 5 min, and counted after 48 and 96 h. For a better
comparison between the experiments, the cell density was
normalized in percent on the seeding density of 3 9 105 cells/
ml at time 0 h. The results were given as average ± standard
error of mean (s.e.m.) of four independent experiments.
2.4 Cell imaging
After 24 h cultivation time, visualization of fibroblasts
grown on the different spikes followed two procedures:
scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and fluorescence. All
methods focussed on cell alignment, localisation, mor-
phology, and adhesion in dependence of the presented
topography. If not specified, stains were purchased from
Sigma Aldrich (Taufkirchen, Germany).
Concerning SEM-preparation, the samples were washed
with PBS for 5 min, fixed in 3 % glutaraldehyde (in PBS)
for 15 min, and washed three times. Following a second
fixation in 2 % osmiumtetroxid (in PBS) and five washing
steps in water, the samples were dehydrated through series
of ethanol concentration (from [%] 30, 50, 70, 90, 95 and
three times 100, 10 min each). At last the samples were
dried in a critical-point dryer and coated with a 5 nm gold
layer. With the help of an SEM, images of the topographies
were recorded and the cells were analyzed.
Fluorescence staining of the nuclei and actin filaments
was performed simultaneously with antibody staining of
focal adhesion complexes focussing on vinculin and focal
adhesion kinase (FAK) p-Tyr397. After washing with PBS,
fibroblasts were fixed with 4 % paraformaldehyde solved
in PBS at 4 �C for 20 min. To inhibit unspecific antibody-
binding, the cells incubated in a 2 % bovine serum-PBS
solution at 37 �C for 30 min. Following two washing steps
5 min each, the primary antibodies (solved in 0.3 % Tri-
ton-X100 in PBS) were added at 4 �C over night. Before
incubating in the secondary anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor anti-
body solution in 0.3 % Triton-X100 in PBS (Invitrogen,
Darmstadt, Germany) including Hoechst 33342 for nucleus
staining at 37 �C for 1 h, the cells were washed twice
5 min each. Following another washing step, phalloidin-
Atto 488 was used to stain actin filaments. After 20 min
incubation time, the cells were washed and kept in PBS.
Images were recorded using a fluorescence microscope
(Nikon TE 2000-E, Nikon, Dusseldorf, Germany).
3 Results
3.1 Structure dimensions
The generated spike structures were uniformly arranged on
the entire surface. By adjusting the process parameter laser
fluence from 2.6 to 12 J/cm2, different size dimensions
were achieved. A quantification of both topologies
revealed, that the spike-to-spike distances were arranged
between 2.08 lm ± 0.04 (small spikes, Fig. 1a) and
6.74 lm ± 0.85 (big spikes, Fig. 1b).
3.2 Fibronectin adsorption onto the spikes
The adsorption of fibronectin was quantified as a function
of ligand-coating concentrations via ELISA. As shown in
Fig. 2, fibronectin adsorption was improved onto the small
spikes, but significantly reduced on the big spikes when
compared with the control surface. For instance, the rela-
tive fluorescence intensity of 2.505 on the control was
increased to 3.857 on the small, but reduced to 769 on the
big spikes when coated with 10 lg/cm2.
3.3 Spike dimensions and cell behaviour
The SEM-images in Fig. 3 point out, that fibroblasts formed
a monolayer on the unstructured silicon surface. Concerning
the spike structures, differences occurred between the small
(Fig. 3a) and big (Fig. 3b) surface features. On the small
Fig. 1 SEM-images of laser-generated spike structures in Si with different size dimensions: small (a) and big (b)
J Mater Sci: Mater Med (2012) 23:2813–2819 2815
123
spikes, fibroblasts proliferated to a high range, presented a
normal elongated morphology, and orientate on the struc-
tures. On the big spikes, cell growth was reduced and
fibroblasts were more rounded.
The obtained differences in the growth behaviour pat-
tern were supported by the detailed estimation of prolif-
eration (Fig. 4). After 96 h cultivation time, the cells
reached 546 % on the control surface. This rate was
comparable on the small spikes with a value of 489 %. In
accordance with Fig. 3b, on the big spikes fibroblasts
reduced their proliferation significantly to 394 %.
Different staining procedures were performed to analyze
cell morphology and cell attachment (Fig. 5). Indepen-
dently from the surface, the shape of the nuclei (blue) was
not negatively affected. On the small spikes, actin filaments
(green) were well organized, and the fibroblasts formed
many cellular extensions (Fig. 5a). On the contrary, fibro-
blasts formed less and shorter extensions and were more
rounded in the presence of the big spikes (Fig. 5c). Con-
cerning vinculin (red), it was less detectable on the big
spikes than on the small spikes (Fig. 5a, c). Furthermore,
fibroblasts formed less FAK (red) on the big spikes
(Fig. 5d) than on the small spikes (Fig. 5b).
4 Discussion
Since cells are very sensitive to the chemical and topo-
graphical pattern of their environment, there is a demand to
understand biomaterial-cell interactions for tissue engi-
neering applications. However, to capture the degree of
complexity which is responsible for cell guidance, a bio-
material with just one modifiable property has to be engi-
neered—in turn, the specific role of this certain parameter
can be identified. Due to the geometric architecture of the
tissue and defined scale of the extracellular matrix and
signaling molecules, focussing on the parameter ‘topogra-
phy’ is very promising.
Concerning surfaces structuring the fabrication pro-
cesses are very diverse and include photolithography,
electron beam lithography, laser holography, polymer
demixing, electrochemical porous etching, plasma treat-
ment and others [12, 13]. However, a systematic analysis of
cell responses to defined patterned materials requires a
technique, which is not limited by the resolution, repro-
ducibility, variety of texturing, production time and costs.
The usage of laser-technologies was shown to be a very
reliable method. Via material ablation different topologies
can be generated without changes in its biocompatibility or
causing side-effects like mechanical damages of the sub-
strate or heat-affected zones [7, 8]. Changes in the micro-
fabrication parameters such as laser fluence enable a
control over surface feature dimensions [9]. To overcome
the drawbacks of commonly used femtosecond lasers
related to the production time, picosecond lasers were
Fig. 2 Fibronectin adsorption onto small and big Si-spike structures
in comparison to the control quantified by ELISA as a function of
ligand-coating concentrations. The results are given as average of
relative fluorescence intensity of six independent measurements
Fig. 3 SEM-images of fibroblasts cultivated on a small and b big Si-spikes
2816 J Mater Sci: Mater Med (2012) 23:2813–2819
123
applied for surface structuring in this study. As shown in
Fig. 1, microsized spike structures in silicon were pro-
duced. In comparison the femtosecond laser-generated
silicon spikes in [9], we indeed confirmed a reduction of
production time up to 50 times. These advantages make
picosecond laser very attractive for surface structuring.
Whether the spike structures in silicon manipulate cell/
tissue responses, was analyzed with respect to two different
spike features named ‘small’ (Fig. 1a) and ‘big’ spikes
(Fig. 1b). The parameter of interest spike-to-spike distance
was arranged between 2.08 lm ± 0.04 and 6.74 lm ±
0.85, respectively.
Before cells can attach to implanted materials, it has to
be surrounded by the extracellular matrix, which in turn
provides anchoring points for cell binding [2]. In this study,
the adsorption of fibronectin was investigated. We found
that the adsorption is improved on the small spikes and
reduced on the big spikes (Fig. 2). An explanation of this
observation is difficult, since an increase of absorption on
both surface features should have been more plausible—
correlating with an increase of the entire surface area after
structuring. It can be assumed that the topography affects
the conformation of fibronectin, which was shown to be
very sensitive to the substrate [14, 15]. That might be the
reason why our performed ELISA detected differences.
To follow the question how cells respond to both spike
topographies, we concentrated on adhesion via analyzing
focal adhesion complexes, localisation, morphology via the
Fig. 4 Proliferation profiles of fibroblasts in dependence of small and
big Si-spikes in comparison to the control over 96 h cultivation time.
The results are given as average ± s.e.m. of four independent
measurements, normalized in percent on the seeding cell density of
3 9 105 cells/ml at t = 0 h
Fig. 5 Fluorescence images of
fibroblasts cultivated on (a,
b) small and (c, d) big Si-spikes
showing the nucleus (blue),
actin filaments (green, a, c),
vinculin (red, a, c) and FAK
p-Tyr397 (red, b, d) (Color
figure online)
J Mater Sci: Mater Med (2012) 23:2813–2819 2817
123
cytoskeleton and proliferation. As illustrated in Figs. 3, 4,
5, the behaviour of fibroblasts could selectively be trig-
gered: small spikes did not negatively affect fibroblasts,
whereas their behaviour was significantly reduced on big
spikes. Similarly to our previous work in [9], we could
repeat that spikes in silicon control fibroblasts. In this
context, the used laser technology for structuring—either
femtosecond or picosecond lasers—did not cause a dif-
ference. However, cell control depends on the spike-to-
spike distances. Only a distance of 6.74 lm enabled posi-
tive cell responses, whereas negative responses occurred on
4.8 lm [9] and 2.08 lm. Therefore, we conclude that cell
control correlates with a turnover point of the topography.
Concerning fibroblasts it has to be arranged between 6.74
and 4.8 lm spike-to-spike distances. In addition, this
turnover point has to be cell specific, since neuroblastoma
cells responded well to 4.8 lm dimensions [9].
How cells are able to detect this turnover point, which
results in cell control, is still unsolved. Theoretically, it
depends on different factors: cell adhesion, cell morphol-
ogy, intercellular contacts or influences on cell cycle pro-
gression. Due to the complex signaling cascades that guide
cell behaviour and functions, probably several aspects
correlate with each other [2]. As a consequence of topo-
graphically-induced changes in the amount of fibronectin
adsorption and/or its conformation (Fig. 2), cell binding
has to be controlled. This assumption is in accordance with
similar effects on the formation of focal adhesion com-
plexes (Fig. 5). The stained component FAK p-Tyr397 is
only formed when ligands like fibronectin from the ECM
are bounded to integrin receptors; the phosphorylated
subtype further indicates the interaction with Src tyrosine
kinase, which is crucial for cell behaviour and further
complex stabilization [16, 17]. According to the outside-in
signaling cascades of cell attachment, a reduced associa-
tion of fibronectin caused a reduction of cell binding to the
substrate followed by a downgrade of signaling needed for
cell behaviour. In this connection, the spacing of integrin
receptors correlating with the spike-to-spike distances may
also play an important role, even though this factor is rather
dependent from nanoscaled topologies [18]. However,
since changes in the signaling cascade were not analyzed in
this study, we cannot be sure, whether this explanation and
relationship between the ECM and cell functions is the key
parameter for cell control by the topography. In case the
outside-in signaling cascades are stimulated correctly—
regardless fibronectin and FAK results (Figs. 2, 5), the
turnover point may then depend on the cell shape. On the
small spikes, fibroblasts represent an abnormal morphology
with respect to the formation of cellular extensions and the
organization of the cytoskeleton such as vinculin and actin
(Fig. 5). The thereby induced intramolecular forces may
affect other cell behaviour pattern [19]. Furthermore,
rounded cell shapes have an influence on cell–cell contacts,
which were reduced selectively (Fig. 3), and by this means
on the intercellular communication, which was shown
to be essential for cell cycle progression [20]. However,
an understanding of the parameters responsible of the
observed cell control in dependence of a microenviron-
ment, is now realizable by the presented laser technology
for material structuring in the future.
5 Conclusions
Picosecond laser-systems offer the fast fabrication of
defined surface features with controllable size dimensions.
Such dimensions were shown to represent a turnover point,
which controls the adhesion, morphology and proliferation
of cells. The used structures can potentially be applied
for fibroblast inhibition. Therefore, this technology offers
a wide platform to study material–cell-interactions in
dependence of the surface topography and includes appli-
cations in biomedicine and tissue engineering.
Acknowledgments This work was partly supported by Cluster of
Excellence Rebirth ‘‘From Regenerative Biology to Reconstructive
Therapy’’ and BMBF-project REMEDIS. The authors thank Prof.
Dr. H. Kuster, head of the Institute of Biophysics (Leibniz University
Hannover, Germany) for granting the use of the microplate reader and
fluorescence microscope.
References
1. Lee J, Cuddihy MJ, Kotov NA. Three-dimensional cell culture
matrices: state of art. Tissue Eng Part B. 2008;14(1):61–86.
2. Giancotti FG, Ruoslathi E. Integrin signalling. Science. 1999;
285:1028–32.
3. Stevens MM, George JH. Exploring and engineering the cell
surface interface. Science. 2005;310(18):1135–8.
4. Flemming RG, Murphy CJ, Abrams GA, Goodman SL, Nealey
PF. Effects of synthetic micro- and nano-structured surfaces on
cell behavior. Biomaterials. 1999;20:573–88.
5. Wilkinson CDW, Riehle M, Wood M, Gallagher J, Curtis ASG.
The use of materials patterned on a nano- and micro-metric scale
in cellular engineering. Mater Sci Eng C. 2002;19:263–9.
6. Bettinger CJ, Langer R, Borenstein JT. Engineering substrate
micro- and nanotopography to control cell funtion. Angew Chem
Int Ed Engl. 2009;48(30):5406–14.
7. Fadeeva E, Schlie S, Koch J, Chichkov BN, Vorobyev AY, Guo
C. Femtosecond laser-induced surface structures on platinum and
their effects on surface wettability and fibroblast cell prolifera-
tion. Cont Angle Wettability Adhes. 2009;6:163–71.
8. Schlie S, Fadeeva E, Ovsianikov A, Koch J, Ngezahayo A,
Chichkov BN. Laser-based nanoengineering for biomedical
applications. Photonic Nanostruct Fundam Appl. 2011;9:159–62.
9. Schlie S, Fadeeva E, Koch J, Ngezahayo A, Chichkov BN.
Femtosecond laser fabricated spike structures for selective con-
trol of cellular behavior. J Biomater Appl. 2010;25(3):217–33.
10. Koroleva A, Schlie S, Fadeeva E, Gittard SD, Ovsianikov A,
Koch J, Narayan RJ, Chichkov BN. Microreplication of laser-
fabricated surfaces and three-dimensional structures. J Opt. 2010.
doi:10.1088/2040-8978/12/12/124009.
2818 J Mater Sci: Mater Med (2012) 23:2813–2819
123
11. Anderson JM. Biological responses to biomaterials. Annu Rev
Mater Res. 2001;31:81–110.
12. Berry CC, Dalby MJ, McCloy D, Affrossman S. The fibroblast
response to tubes exhibiting internal nanotopography. Biomate-
rials. 2005;26:4985–92.
13. Choi C-H, Hagvall SH, Wu BM, Dunn JCY, Beygui RE, Kim
C-J. Cell interaction with three-dimensional sharp-tip nanoto-
pography. Biomaterials. 2007;28:1672–9.
14. Faucheux N, Tzoneva R, Nagel M-D, Groth T. The dependence
of fibrillar adhesions in human fibroblasts on substratum chem-
istry. Biomaterials. 2006;27:234–45.
15. Baujard-Lamotte L, Noinville S, Goubard F, Marque P, Pauthe E.
Kinetics of conformational changes of fibronectin adsorbed onto
model surfaces. Colloids Surf B. 2008;63:129–37.
16. Lo SH. Focal adhesions: what’s new inside. Dev Biol. 2006;
294:280–91.
17. Wozniak MA, Modzelewska K, Kwong L, Keely PJ. Focal
adhesion regulation of cell behavior. Biochim Biophys Acta.
2004;1692:103–19.
18. Selhuber-Unkel C, Erdmann T, Lopez-Garcıa M, Kessler H,
Schwarz US, Spatz JP. Cell adhesion strength his controlled by
intermolecular spacing of adhesion receptors. Biophys J. 2010;
98:543–51.
19. Ingber DE, Tensegrity I. Cell structure and hierarchical systems
biology. J Cell Sci. 2003;116:1157–73.
20. Schlie S, Mazur K, Bintig W, Ngezahayo A. Cell cycle dependent
regulation of gap junction coupling and apoptosis in GFSHR-17
granulosa cells. J Biomed Sci Eng. 2010;3:884–91.
J Mater Sci: Mater Med (2012) 23:2813–2819 2819
123