Large scale quantum computing in silicon

with imprecise qubit couplingsArXiv:1506.04913 (2015)Giuseppe Pica

gp46@st-andrews.ac.ukJoint work with:

Stephen Lyon, Ravin Bhatt (Princeton)Brendon Lovett (St Andrews)Thomas Schenkel (Berkeley)

SiQIP 201511/09/2015 - Cambridge

Silicon quantum computing

2010

2015

Single-shot readout of an electron spin in

siliconMorello et al.,

Nature 467, 687

A single-atom electron spin qubit in silicon

Pla et al., Nature 489, 541

2012

High-fidelity readout and control

of a nuclear spin qubit in silicon

Pla et al., Nature 496, 334

2013

Storing quantum information for 30 seconds in a nanoelectronic

device

2014

Muhonen et al., Nat. Nanotech. 9, 986

An addressable quantum dot qubit with fault-tolerant control-fidelity

Veldhorst et al., Nat. Nanotech. 9, 981

Veldhorst et al., arXiv :1411.5760 To appear in Nature

A two-qubit logic gate in silicon

SCALING UP!

Illustration: Bryan Christie Design

Nuclear ~ 39 mins Electron ~ secs

Saeedi et al., Science 342, 830 (2013)Tyryshkin et al., Nat. Mater. 11, 143 (2012)

Koiller et al., PRL 88, 027903 (2002)

Donor spins in silicon:long memories are hard to couple

Valley degeneracy affects exchange spin interactions

Crystal symmetries and deeper donors can partially hPica et al., PRB 89, 235306 (2014)

Electron spins in silicon quantum dots: malleable qubits are more fragile

Couplings can be engineered

Petta et al., Science 309, 2180 (2005)Veldhorst et al., arXiv :1411.5760

(2014)

Electron ~ msdue to Overhauser fields

and charge noise

Chekhovich et al., Nature Materials 12, 494 (2013)

Veldhorst et al., Nature Nanotech. 9, 981 (2014)

J

If donors and dots are permanently mixed,

donor coherence is lost

Coupling «on demand» allows different degrees of freedom to be addressed

when convenient

Making an useful hybrid

𝐵0

𝐵1

oxide

--

oxide

+

Si

oxide

--

oxide

+

Si

d

+

Dot voltage

DOT

DONOR

J

Highly coherent donors

Morley et al., Nature Materials 9, 725 (2010)

Wolfowicz et al., Nature Nanotech. 8, 561 (2013)

• I=9/2 large spin Hilbert space

• Largest hyperfine coupling – fast (GHz) nuclear spin rotations

• High fidelity spin rotations

𝐵0

ABi

DOT

DONOR

Clock transition

Three qubits

Si:Bi clock transitions Bismuth and dot levels can cross at clock transition

𝐵0

A

DOT

Quantum dot

Qubit coupling: controlled SWAP

Dot-allowed avoided crossing

Dot-forbidden crossing

J𝐵0

The importance of being adiabatic

Entanglement based on dynamical phases dt J(t) is very sensitive to noise and precise

coupling

J

CNOT from 3-qubit adiabatic controlled SWAP

is more robust«Same» final

state population if J is pulsed in μs

(Landau-Zener physics)

High fidelity donor-dot CNOT

“NMR”

Global Pulsed ENDOR (CNOT on donor)

𝐵0ΔJ𝑉

10 mT

10 mV

𝐵0∗

0

0

x01

x00

0x1

x0

NMR-controlled swap

Dot “ESR”

0xx1 x0x1

x000

NMR-controlled swap

x00

π

Phase erasing steps

Adiabaticity gives large scale fault-tolerance

SiO2

Si

ALD

+

SiO2

+ + + ++ + ++ +

++

oxide

oxide

+

Si

6 valleys = ±, ±, ± × donor depth

+

Exchange couplings vary violently on sub-nm scale

Adiabaticity gives large scale fault-tolerance

+ + + +

Uniform local magnetic fields

10 MHz local frequency shifts

+ + + +𝐵𝑙𝑜𝑐𝑎𝑙

Realistic local shifts are < 1

MHz

Extreme robustness to

locally inhomogeneous magnetic fields

Donor-dot scaled architecture

• Electrode structure allows easy site selectivity, any other

control is global

• physical qubits per with realistic sub-micron IC pitch

J J

Adiabatic switching of electrodes is uniform across the array

(minimal wiring)

One-page surface code

Data bits are inspected on a rolling basis by

measuring the measurement bits

Data qubits

Measurement qubits

Locally entangled sets of physical qubits host

collective logical qubit states

Best proven single-qubit error threshold (~1%)

Fowler et al.,  Phys. Rev. A 86, 032324 (2012)

Donor-dot surface code

Data qubits Quantum Dots

Measurement qubits

Long coherence donors

J

J

J

J

CNOT fidelity >99.9% across

almost the entire array

> 99.5% donor readout fidelity

Pla et al., Nature 489, 541 (2012)

Watson et al., PRL (2015)

A full surface code cycle (10μs)

1.

The array of interface electron spins is rigidly shifted to neighbouring dots

CCD gates should allow fast transport (~ 100 ps)

2.

CNOTs between the donor-dot pairs to address allow entanglement of the MQ and the DQ

The other pairs work as defects – uncostrained degrees of freedom

3.

After a cycle of four nearest-neighbour movements the initial configuration is achieved

4.

Measurement qubits (donors) are measured to check for errors occurred in the data qubits (dots)

J

J

/ ~

Decoherence

within 1% threshold

Fault tolerance

ArXiv:1506.04913 (2015)

• Presented a novel two-qubit gate between long memory donor states and scalable dot spins

• Adiabatic tuning of the donor-dot exchange interaction allows high fidelity CNOTs across most of the array, in spite of the vast coupling range

• Presented a fully scaled silicon architecture to implement the best error correction to date

• All manipulations are global but for easily controlled local voltage pulses – 10 μs / cycle

+

Si

+

oxide

--

J

Further work

Local readout sites needed for each measurement qubit

per logical qubit!

JAlternatives to electron transport between neighbouring quantum dots

Cycle speed currently limited by ability to sweep the magnetic field

(heating) – better ideas?𝐵0

Acknowledgements

Brendon LovettUniversity of St

AndrewsStephen Lyon Princeton University

Ravindra Bhatt Princeton University

Thomas SchenkelBerkeley National

Laboratory