Large Livestock Facilities Ordinancecalcluster2.co.calumet.wi.us/calendar/County Board/4-07 Large...
Transcript of Large Livestock Facilities Ordinancecalcluster2.co.calumet.wi.us/calendar/County Board/4-07 Large...
Large Livestock Facilities Ordinance
Early History
• In 2000, new large dairy operation was built in County on Irish Road
• County zoning ordinance - exempted large dairies from conditional use process
• Some opposition to site• Tri-committee started meeting in late 2000 –
early 2001
Tri-Committee
• Planning and Zoning, Land and Water Conservation, and Ag. and Extension Committees
• Met for education, information gathering, and decision making 2000 - 2005
• Recommended forming County task force in 2003
Task Force on Livestock Operations
• Met from March 2003 - October 2004 “to fully evaluate if and how existing, expanding, and new livestock operations should be regulated”
• 17 member diverse, volunteer group • Met 18 times (over 1000 hours)• List of recommendations to County Board
Task Force Recommendations
• Regulations apply county wide• Process include neighbor’s rights and meetings• Setbacks - lot lines, roads, natural features,
parks, and municipalities• Basic standards to protect surface and ground
water for all farms• Update manure storage ordinance and require
12 months storage in Karst areas
History - 2005
• Staff drafted an ordinance• Tri-committee tabled• Ag & Extension dropped out for regulations• Staff met with towns for input• P&Z and L&W Committees directed staff to:
– Pursue siting ordinance through zoning– If zoning not feasible, pursue County-wide licensing
ordinance
Wisconsin Statutes and Rules 2005 - 2006
• State was moving forward with own regulations at the same time as our County
• Established uniform requirements and application process for large livestock operations state-wide– Many of the recommendations of Calumet County Task
Force could not be used in a local ordinance• Requirements and process apply only if county had
a local ordinance regulating large livestock facilities
History - 2006
• P and Z staff work on siting ordinance through comprehensive planning process
• DATCP interpretations of new state regulations made it unfeasible to develop ordinance for siting
• Staff begin development of:– Licensing ordinance using WCA model – Local performance standards for groundwater
protection
Draft Calumet Large Livestock Facilities Ordinance
• Based on WCA model• Incorporates all requirements from Wisconsin
regulations• Incorporates Local Performance standards for
groundwater protection
Large Livestock Facilities Ordinance
• Requires new and existing large livestock operations to get a license from County to build or expand– New
• > 500 animal units (au) = 357 dairy cows– Existing
• > 500 au and increase by at least 20%
• Must meet or agree to meet certain performance standards to get license
Large Livestock Facilities Ordinance
• Apply for license using DATCP application forms and worksheets
• Forms and worksheet show whether meet performance standard
• Additional worksheet for local standards• If application and worksheets complete and
accurate, County must approve license• Application fee $1,000 as allowed by state
State Performance Standards
• Setbacks for structures– Property line
• 100 feet ( <1,000 au)• 200 feet ( 1,000 or > au)• No further encroachment for existing structures
– Road right of way• 100 feet (<1,000 au)• 150 feet (1,000 or > au)• No further encroachment for existing structures
State Performance Standards• Setbacks for manure storages
– Property line and road row• 350 feet for new• No further encroachment for existing and some new
that meet certain requirement
• Comply with County wetland, shoreland, and floodplain ordinances
• Comply with setbacks in Wisconsin well codes
State Performance Standards• Odor
– Must achieve minimum “odor score”– Score dependent on manure storage and
handling, separation distance from neighbors, and odor management practices
– Exempt • Existing < 1,000 au• > 2,500 feet from nearest neighbor
State Performance Standards
• Nutrient management– Manure applied according to a nutrient management plan
that meets NRCS Technical Standards– Plan developed by qualified nutrient management planner
• Manure storage facilities– New storages built to NRCS Technical Standards– Existing storages certified to be structurally sound, not
leaking, and built to previous Technical Standards– Unused storages properly closed to Technical Standards– Storage capacity adequate for nutrient management plan
State Performance Standards
• Runoff Management– Animal lots
• New and altered - meet Technical Standards for filtering runoff
• Existing lots - maximum lbs. Phosphorus runoff• No discharge to conduits to groundwater
– Feed storage• Divert surface runoff• Collection, storage, and treatment of leachate
State Performance Standards
• Divert runoff away from manure piles, manure and feed storages, and animal lots 300 feet from streams, 1,000 feet from lakes
• No unconfined manure piles 300 feet from streams and 1,000 feet from lakes
• No overflow of manure storages• No unlimited access by livestock to lakes
and streams
Local Performance Standards
• State law allows a county to develop additional and/or stricter local standards for their licensing ordinance
• Local standards must be adopted as scientific and defensible findings of fact that they are necessary to protect public health or safety
• Draft ordinance contains local standards to improve and protect groundwater
Next Steps
• Public hearing on ordinance and local standards– Wednesday, May 2, 7:00pm in Room 025
• Final drafts of ordinance and standards• Consideration by County Board on May 15
– Resolution adopting local standards– Resolution adopting ordinance
Groundwater Quality in Calumet County
Most residents get their drinking water from fractured bedrock
Our wells intercept the fractures to get water.
The fractures transmit water and pollutants efficiently and rapidly
• Soils can filter out pollutants before they reach fractures and groundwater
• Thin soils make poor filters• Light textured soil make poor filters
Brown water events
• Been going on for many years in Calumet County
• Brown, sometimes manure smelling well water
• At least 5 reports each year• Many residents don’t report it
and have learned to live with it
Latest Well Contamination
Brothertown 2006Neighbors wells had to be replaced
Nitrates(1,127 results)
35% Unsafe(over 10ppm)
33% Elevated(2-10 ppm)
32% Natural(less than 2ppm)
State Average – 10% over 10ppm
2002 - 2006 Well Testing Results
Coliform Bacteria(1,383 results)
33% Unsafe (bacteria positive)
67% Safe (bacteria negative)
State average – 15% Unsafe
2002 - 2006 Well Testing Results
E. coli Bacteria(1,383 test results)
5.1 % Unsafe (E.coli positive)
2002 - 2005 Well Testing Results
The Bottom Line
47% of tested wells 2002-2006 were unsafe due to nitrates
and/or bacteria
In some neighborhoods with thin soils, over 80% were unsafe
High Nitrate Results Correlate to Thin Soils, Soils< 50 Feet Deep, and Lighter Textured Soils
E. Coli Positives Correlate to Thin Soils, Soils< 50 Feet Deep, and Lighter Textured Soils
Karst Features in These Areas
Bedrock Openings
Sinkholes
Karst Features
• Occur in sunken or low lying areas that have no surface drainage outlet• Ponded water disappears rapidly• Infiltrates through thin soil unfiltered into the bedrock
Area of Focused Infiltration
Karst Features
Soils With Less Than 5 Feet of Depth to Bedrock
Karst Features
Channels to Karst Features
Our Land Use Activities Impact
Groundwater
• Land use primarily agricultural
• Most fields receive manure
• Manure storages and animal lots East Central Wisconsin Regional Planning
Commission. Data not yet official.
Manure Quantities and Nutrients
• 1 dairy cow/heifer = 120 lbs. manure/day• 1 calf = 60 lbs./day• Calumet County
– 24,000 dairy cows and 24,000 heifer and calves• Waste from 1 cow = waste from 20 - 40
people (EPA)• Nitrogen from 1 septic system serving 4
people = nitrogen in manure from 1 cow
Tools for Improving Our Groundwater
• Information and Education• Conservation Practices• Cost Sharing• Targeting of Sensitive and Problem
Areas• Use of Programs and Partnerships• Regulations
Local Performance Standards for Agriculture to
Improve and Protect Groundwater Quality
What is a Performance Standard?
Conservation practice or management practice to reduce impacts of a land use to our land and water resources
State Has Established Performance Standards
• Apply State-wide• Address primarily surface water quality• Some groundwater protection, but not
adequate in our “swiss cheese landscape”
Why Are Local Standards Needed?
• Health and safety of our families and neighbors and the economic well being of our dairy farms depend on good water quality
• Local standards will serve as a baseline for expected land use practices in our problem areas
• Calumet County Task Force on Livestock Operations recommendation to include protection of surface and groundwater quality, especially in relation to karst features
Proposed Local Performance Standards
for Agriculture• Based on recommendations developed by a regional
panel of experts during past year – Top groundwater scientists and experts in Wisconsin– Well driller– Custom hauler– Farmers– Crop Consultant– Local and state resource professionals
• Standards are based on current scientific knowledge, with added professional judgment
Some Things to Think About
• We need to move forward to improve and protect this vital resource
• Some think that the standards are too strict, others that they are too weak
• The proposed standards are a compromise:– To preserve agriculture within the County– To improve/protect our groundwater resource
Where Local
Standards Would Apply
(State-wide standards apply everywhere)
Use of Local Standards Will Be Promoted With:
1. Education2. Cost sharing incentives3. Regulation
Local Standards
• No delivery of waste materials to:– Groundwater– Wells– Karst features
• Pollution seen entered Karst features will be presumed to be reaching groundwater
Sinkholes and Bedrock Openings
• No cropping in/on them• No dumping of waste• No tile outlets• No diversion of runoff to them• Use one best management practice:
– 100 foot wide permanent vegetative strip– 100 foot wide alfalfa/grass strip 4 out of 6 years – Reduced tillage within 100 feet– Divert runoff – Properly close the sinkhole
Animal Lots
Animal Lots and Milking Centers
• On sites susceptible to groundwater contamination (Near wells and karst features, on thin soils)
– Divert clean water runoff away from them – No discharge of untreated animal waste or milking
center waste• Use conservation practice to capture or filter• Each site is unique, pick from practices that will treat the waste
or decrease potential for groundwater pollution
• For new lots, soil borings to 5 feet
Unconfined Manure Piles
Unconfined Manure Piles
• No piles on sites susceptible to groundwater contamination– Ordinances, phased in for all but larger
operations• Written stacking plan within 3 years• No piles within 10 years or if have storage
• Piles on other sites must meet NRCS Technical Standards
Manure Storage Facilities
103 permitted facilities
109 no permit (probably not built to technical standards)
Manure and Feed Storage Facilities
• Manure storages built before County ordinance (1989) requiring permit– Inspected and certified by engineer or engineering
practitioner that have structural integrity and no leakage• Ordinance - all but larger operations can substitute inspection
every 2 years by qualified person
• Storages lacking structural integrity or leaking, must be fixed or properly closed
• Unused storages must be properly closed
Manure and Feed Storage Facilities
• New manure storages must have a capacity of 9 months storage (larger operations only)
• New manure or feed storage facilities must be setback 400 feet from Karst features
Manure Applications
Land Applications of Manure
• Qualified person map Karst features and thin soils• Qualified person develop written spill response plan• No application of manure on soils < 3 feet to bedrock
– Other nutrients without viruses/bacteria allowed• Manure applications on soils 3 feet to < 5 feet
– Not to exceed 7,000 gal or 17.5 tons per acre or ½ what called for in nutrient management plan per application
– Maximum 2 applications/year, separated by > 2 weeks– Alternatives with LWCD approval
Land Applications of Manure
• No manure applications – Within 100 ft. of Karst features or channels
leading to them– Within 100 feet of a private well and 1,000 ft. of
a municipal or school well• Other nutrients without viruses/bacteria allowed
– To saturated soils
Land Applications of Manure
• No applications to frozen, ice covered, or snow covered ground– Ordinances - phased in for all but larger operations
and operations with at least 5 months storage• Written spreading plan within 3 years• No applications of liquid manure within 5 years• No applications of solid manure within 10 years
Land Applications of Manure
• Immediate incorporation after application– Shallow (<10 inch incorporation) on soils 3 ft –
<5 ft. to bedrock– Some allowances for actively growing crops,
pasture, and no-till with LWCD approval – Allowance for farms with solid manure and no
storage for up to 10 years with approved spreading plan
Nutrient Management Plans
• Karst features and wells must be located on plan maps by a qualified person
• Plans required by ordinance must be updated annually– Copy to LWCD by June 1st each year
NRCS Technical Standards
• Are specifications for construction, operation, and maintenance of conservation practices
• Are updated frequently• Most current version must be used for
conservation practices
Next Steps• Public hearing on livestock facilities ordinance and local
standards– Wednesday, May 2, 7:00pm in Room 025
• Final draft standards• Consideration by County Board on May 15
– Resolution adopting local standards• Adoption of local standards does not mean that they are
enforceable– Would need to include them in separate ordinances to enforce them– Offer of cost sharing may also be needed in some cases
Calumet CountyCalumet CountyLand & Water Conservation DepartmentLand & Water Conservation Department
206 Court St206 Court StChilton, WI 53014Chilton, WI 53014
(920) 849(920) 849--1444 and 9891444 and [email protected]@co.calumet.wi.us
Eugene McLeodCounty Conservationist
Mike HaaseProject Specialist
Marissa HackerSecretary/Technician
Amy CallisGroundwater Specialist