Language Understanding of Schizophrenic Patients from MEG Signals

28
Language Understanding Analysis in Schizophrenic Patients from MEG Data Keshab K. Parhi, ECE Tingting Xu, ECE Massoud Stephane, Psychiatry, VA Medical Center Arthur Leuthold, Neuroscience, VA Medical Center Feb. 16, 2012

Transcript of Language Understanding of Schizophrenic Patients from MEG Signals

Language Understanding

Analysis in Schizophrenic

Patients from MEG Data

Keshab K. Parhi, ECE

Tingting Xu, ECE

Massoud Stephane, Psychiatry, VA Medical Center

Arthur Leuthold, Neuroscience, VA Medical Center

Feb. 16, 2012

Outline

Background & Objective

Design & Methodology

Results & Analysis

Conclusion & Future Work

Schizophrenia

Chronic, severe, disabling mental disorder

About 1% Americans affected

Causes remain unknown

Symptoms

Positive Symptoms

Hallucination

Delusion

Negative Symptoms

Disruptions to normal emotions and behaviors

Lack of pleasure in everyday life

Cognitive Symptoms

Problems with attention, memory, decision making

Language disorder

Objective

Understand abnormal neural oscillations (frequency, location, time) associated with language disorder in schizophrenia.

Level-specific neural oscillations

Neural dynamics across language levels

Linguistic Task

Discriminate correct & incorrect language stimuli

Condition

Stimulus

Correct Incorrect

Lexical The-cabin-fire-roped-the The-cabin-freet-roped-the

Semantic The-boy-ate-the-bagel The-bagel-ate-the-boy

Discourse

My sister wanted to replace a kitchen cabinet. She called a local

company and gave them the desired dimensions…

The-company-built-the-cabinet The-company-bought-the-kitchen

Classification based feature selection

Level-specific (same condition)

Neural-dynamic (across conditions)

Outline

Background & Objective

Design & Methodology

Results & Analysis

Conclusion & Future Work

Feature Extraction (ERD/ERS)

BPF down-sample

MEG calculate power

1- 48 Hz 8 bands

smooth feature

256 KHz

calculate ERD/S

250ms window 125ms overlap

mean power

𝐸𝑅𝐷𝑆(𝑗) = 𝐴(𝑗) − 𝑅

𝑅∗ 100% 𝑅 =

1

𝐾 𝐴(𝑗)

𝑛0+𝐾

𝑗=𝑛0

Spectral-Temporal-Spatial Feature Set 248 channel * 8 freq. band * 92 time points = 182,528 features

Linguistic Task

Timing diagram (11.5 sec / trial)

3 sec 5 sec 3.5 sec

Baseline Encode Post-stimuli

1 2 3 4 5

Stimulus (Word / Nonword)

Correct: the - cabin - fire - roped – the

Incorrect: the - cabin - freet - roped - the

Framework

Language

Task

Record

MEG

raw

MEG BPF

subband

MEG Calculate

ERD/S

Fscore

Filtering

full

feature set

SVM-RFE

Backward

Selectiong

top

features

Feature Selection

Analysis

Classification

Subjects

12 schizophrenia patients, 10 healthy controls

Native English speaker, right-handed

Patients meet DSM-IV criteria

Experimental protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of the VA Medical Center and of the University of Minnesota

ERD/ERS – Delta 1-4Hz

ERD/ERS – Alpha 8-12Hz

ERD/ERS – Gamma 40-48Hz

Outline

Background & Objective

Design & Methodology

Results & Analysis

Conclusion & Future Work

Level-specific result

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1000

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Number of Features

Pre

dic

tion E

rror

(%)

Lexical

Semantic

Classification error

Classification (LOO cross validation )

Lexical: 10 Controls, 12 Patients , 20 top features

Semantic: 11 Controls, 10 Patients, 53 top features

Top Feature Analysis (lexical)

Delta band, occipital lobe, post-stimuli phase

Top Feature Analysis (lexical)

Alpha band, left-temporal lobe, encoding phase

Top Feature Analysis (lexical)

Beta band, left-frontal lobe, encoding phase

Across-level result

Control: sem (10) v.s. dis (9), 20 top features

- LOO cross validation error 3/19

- top features cover multiple bands and at different brain locations

Patient: sem (10) v.s. dis (7), 5 top features

- LOO cross validation error 1/17

- most top features are selected from 12-16Hz frequency band and located at left temporal lobe.

Top features (patient)

Top features (control)

Conclusion

Evaluate abnormal neural oscillation in schizophrenia during language processing

Spectral-spatial-temporal MEG patterns

Two-step feature selection

High classification accuracy

Significant between group oscillation difference

Further Work

Neural dynamics between language levels

Larger dataset

More reliable feature selection algorithm

Acknowledgement

Ms. Tingting Xu, ECE

Dr. Massoud Stephane Psychiatry & Psychology , University of Minnesota

Brain Science Center, VA Medical Center

Dr. Arthur Leuthold Neuroscience, University of Minnesota

Brain Science Center, VA Medical Center

- MEG data collection

Minnesota Super Computing Institute (computation power)

Questions?