Language as Technical Freedom

download Language as Technical Freedom

of 4

Transcript of Language as Technical Freedom

  • 8/3/2019 Language as Technical Freedom

    1/4

    Language as Technical Freedom

    Pearl was freakishly stirred to feeling concerning her mothers

    icon. Unauthorized Pearl is the double of a woman with no hero at

    hand but her own handiwork as evidence of a dominance retainedby the outcast over the society that presumes itself a successful

    tyrant.

    Hester and whose Faint Occupations were quilted patched

    embroidered and monetized as social relations and gender as a

    definitive destiny, meant one thing that for Pearl was a source of

    great regard: The letter that gives her mother her pristine status as a

    scapegoat forms the fashion of Pearls greatest designs: she is hersymbol and her symbol is her. There is no equivocation in her

    relishing of her mothers punishment as her own special

    inheritance toward what looks as whats most impossible to attain

    in such circumstances as a child of adultery in a prison society for

    women: give birth to independence from spiritual bondage into

    which the newborn is conceived: female, spirited, freakish,

    precocious, omniscient.

    So many myths permeate the background of literature that it

    becomes a grotesque to wonder at how to speak of itself in a moral

    history as a voice expressing its confounded awakening.

    There are ages in feelingsthose feelings just as words, possess a

    lifeform. There is no metaphor that is strong enough to yield all of

    language as a tenor onto the vehicle of language as speech or as

    any of the divisible components of language which call to mind:semantics, phonology, phonetics, syntax, grammar, and

    morphology. Therefore, language becomes a technique that

    knowledge requires to create foresight where foresight may lead

    whether it is toward celestial ideals or earthen investments,

    language has no ulterior motive but to its own best uses. Therefore

  • 8/3/2019 Language as Technical Freedom

    2/4

    language is amoral. It has no desire for tyranny to whatever end it

    guarantees it privilege. For language is not a body of the mind. It

    cant be beheld in one moment as a generalization except when it

    is suppressed yet its suppression speaks often with more efficacy

    than its freedom does. Suppression has never been statistically or

    technically efficient. It does not achieve its ends but mightily

    chases its tail. Theres no need to go on and on about suppression.

    Not when the deep end of a note suffices recalling Casals.

    Lala a freedom of speech is a habit of mine.

    It was so funny to hear some rather bright dudes say

    something like, "she will use the master's tools," with a

    quirky squeeze of his eyebrows upward in shock, and I think

    to myself, "rather small expectations I'd have to pursue and

    imitate with their ilk about me." They think of me physically

    not in any other way. Thus I am invisible yet I have nothingbut what he sees me as a source of being. In other words, I do

    not exist and try as I might to deduce any other possibility, he

    will be sure to approach it as an attack against his tools. What

    tools they were hardly called for an inkling of concern or

    suspense. Indeed their specter was of dull detritus of power

    for feeling, seeing, experiencing beauty of thought in its

    torment or in its foment...While all along I am said to have

    been better advantaged than he is because his proximity tome suddenly appears to him as a depreciation of him via my

    comparison, a woman so cheap yet so expensive to his ego

    that surprising my FB amigos you will not find it when I say

    that where they believed themselves desirable was when

  • 8/3/2019 Language as Technical Freedom

    3/4

    most satisfied with his blood lust for insipid mandates such

    as to prove him a hero among others while his most heroic

    trait was his indifference to the qualities of thought and

    aspiration which through association has introduced itself

    into matters heretofore privately held in me and in my

    entitlements earned, respect, indubitable and non-negotiable.

    It is poetry and nothing less so it has to be sufficient without

    evidence or not be an art. It is a bias owing to humanity.

    so some kindhearted soul calls me up to ask me if I organized

    somethign involving students and I thought to myself, "firstyou say I can' t organize a syllabus or a course" now I can

    organize a student movement? I doubt your conclusions

    make much sense. But still I take up the chance to declaim

    that I've never organized students. Rather they have always

    organized themselves while I held up the bull horn and

    recited the lines of the Declaration of Independence which

    when we did, the police did nothing because they had to

    grant us our freedom of speech? So if the police recognizecivil disobedience then all of authority is authored through

    the individual asserting himself or herself, in this case, it

    would be me writing on FB a public memoir as a poem in

    self defense without evidence, without evidence...So with

    replete power such as that of a Flag: A Flag on FB that I

    weave with my fingertips, that I wave in silence made into

    words, sustained in pure form, sealed with the power of its

    mandate for freedom.

    time to cleanse and relax tomorrow out to santa ana oh I need

    to learn the public transportation because someone likes the

    new car he said I shouldn't have bought so it's bike or bus or

    train or desk and that's my only option when I think of

  • 8/3/2019 Language as Technical Freedom

    4/4

    getting about like I'm used to talking to people in public for

    no other reason than a village scene with live music...Ug i

    miss exclusive use of my car and changing back to a family

    in a new different way, I can't get used to the flow of changes

    but better get over it and start living it instead of thinking of

    all the definitions of things as I try to live them as I do ..I'm

    not a writer because a writer uses language, I'm a wordsmith

    and that means I don't choose to be indentured yet I am to the

    never-ending toil of making catalogs of words and speech

    and figure...I might not look like a mechanic in her garage if

    you happen to notice, I look like a two legged female, but I'm

    not. I have a library, lab room, lecture hall, and chronicles

    that describe what I am that has less to do with being a

    person than it does with being an isolate yet being more than

    that. I don't really live for any other reason than to transcribe

    things such as the "heart" and "soul" into the evidence that

    poetry produces: I give these things names and study them so

    I can teach others how to find their own school which is their

    own snowflake in the self. If I am the nucleus of myself am I

    not also all of the other parts of an atom as well? There is

    nothing new under the sun but everything that happens the

    first time, being unique or being original is primary to being

    independent.