Lampiran Hymos Ribasim Siak Rev_ Footer
28
Lampiran HASIL HYMOS DAN RIBASIM L-1
description
l
Transcript of Lampiran Hymos Ribasim Siak Rev_ Footer
Lampiran
HASIL HYMOS DAN RIBASIM
L-1
Lampiran 1. Lokasi Pos Hidrologi (Nama Pos)
Lampiran 2. Skematisasi DSS-Ribasim
L-2
L-3
Lampiran 3. Hasil DSS Ribasim Base Case 2006: Debit rata-rata (m3/s)
L-4
Lampiran 4 : Neraca Air Hasil DSS-Ribasim
Kondisi Base Case 2006
L-5
Lampiran 4 : Neraca Air Hasil DSS-RibasimKondisi Base Case 2006
Results of RIBASIM program Summary Version 6.3 , copyrights Delft Hydraulics, the Netherlands ============================================================================================= For suggestions email to : [email protected]
Table of contents ----------------- Table 1. Water district node summary Table 2. General district node summary Table 3. Groundwater district node summary Table 4. Fixed, variable and advanced irrigation node summary Table 5. Loss flow nodes summary Table 6. Fishpond nodes summary Table 7. Public water supply nodes summary Table 8. Low flow nodes summary Table 9. Brackish fish pond nodes summary Table 10. Surface water reservoirs and run-of-river nodes power summary Table 11. Average annual energy used for pumping at pumping and groundwater district nodes Table 12. Water utilisation per surface water reservoir and diversion
Run-data -------- Run-title ....................................................... Base case User name ....................................................... Planning Unit Hydrological period ............................................. 1992 - 1 upto 2003 - 12 Initial status .................................................. Varies for each year Timesteps per year .............................................. 12 Number of simulation years ...................................... 12 Number of simulation time steps ................................. 144 Start time step of hydrologic year (= first simulation time step) 1 Number of hydrologic years ...................................... 12
L-6
Criteria for failure time step and failure year : 1. If shortage is bigger than a specified percentage of the demand then the time step is accounted as a failure time step (% of demand) 2. If the number of failure time steps within the hydrologic year is equal or bigger than a specified number then the year is accounted as a failure year (# of timesteps) For each node type these criteria are specified (% of demand, # of timesteps): 1.Water district node 1. Irrigated agriculture : 0.10 1 2. Public water : 0.10 1 3. Industry : 0.10 1 2.General district node : 0.10 1 3.Groundwater district node : 1. Irrigation : 0.10 1 2. Pws : 0.10 1 4.Fixed, variable and advanced irrigation node : 0.10 1 5.Loss flow node : 0.10 1 6.Fish pond node : 0.10 1 7.Public water supply node : 0.10 1 8.Low flow node : 0.10 1 9.Brackish fish pond node : 0.10 110.Firm energy at SW reservoirs : 0.10 1 Remarks : 1. Values are yearly averages 2. For the number of success time steps and rate all time steps are accounted 3. For the number of success years and rate the hydrologic years are accounted. A hydrologic year starts at the first simulation time step. 4. Number of successive failure years refers to 3 or more successive hydrologic failure years 5. In the tables below only the active nodes are shown 6. Cumulative salt balance is only generated if salt computation is carried out. The salt balance shows the amount of salt (kg/ha) which flushed out (negative value) or built-up in the irrigation area (positive value) over the whole simulation period.
Table 1. Water district node summary ------------------------------------
Table 2. General district node summary --------------------------------------
No active general nodes in present schematization
Table 3. Groundwater district node summary -------------------------------------------
No active groundwater district nodes in present schematization
L-7
Table 4. Fixed, variable and advanced irrigation node summary --------------------------------------------------------------
Success Success Number Yearly average time steps years of suc- ----------------------------------- ------------ ------------ cessive Demand Deficit Demand Deficit number rate number rate failure Node index and name (Mcm) (Mcm) (m3/s) (m3/s) (-) (%) (-) (%) years ------------------------------------------------ -------- -------- -------- -------- ------ ----- ------ ----- ------- 11 Mandau 262.98 0.00 8.34 0.00 144 100.0 12 100.0 0 12 Tapung Kanan 116.88 0.00 3.71 0.00 144 100.0 12 100.0 0 13 Tapung Kiri 18.60 0.00 0.59 0.00 144 100.0 12 100.0 0 15 Siak 1165.15 0.00 36.95 0.00 144 100.0 12 100.0 0
Total 1563.61 0.00 49.58 0.00
Table 5. Loss flow nodes summary ---------------------------------
No active loss flow nodes in present schematization
Table 6. Fishpond nodes summary --------------------------------
No active fish pond nodes in present schematization
Table 7. Public water supply nodes summary -------------------------------------------
Yearly average Success timest. Success years Number of ------------------------------- --------------- --------------- successive Demand Deficit Demand Deficit number rate number rate failure Max.shortage Node index and name (Mcm) (Mcm) (m3/s) (m3/s) (-) (%) (-) (%) years (% of demand) ----------------------------------------------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ---------- ------------- 16 Mandau 20.10 0.00 0.64 0.00 144 100.0 12 100.0 0 0.0 17 Tapung Kanan 7.86 0.00 0.25 0.00 144 100.0 12 100.0 0 0.0 18 Tapung Kiri 14.45 0.00 0.46 0.00 144 100.0 12 100.0 0 0.0 19 Pku 13.79 0.00 0.44 0.00 144 100.0 12 100.0 0 0.0 20 Siak 42.48 0.00 1.35 0.00 144 100.0 12 100.0 0 0.0
Total 98.68 0.00 3.13 0.00
L-8
Table 8. Low flow nodes summary --------------------------------
No active low flow nodes in present schematization
Table 9. Brackish fish pond nodes summary ------------------------------------------
No active brackish fish pond nodes in present schematization
Table 10. SW reservoirs and run-of-river nodes power summary ------------------------------------------------------------
No active SW reservoir with power station and run-of-river nodes in present schematization
Table 11. Average annual energy used for pumping at pumping and groundwater district nodes ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No pumping and groundwater district nodes in present schematization
Table 12. Water utilisation per SW reservoir and diversion ----------------------------------------------------------
Utilisation over whole simulation period per SW reservoir is defined by the ratio between: 1. Sum of Minimum(downstream flow, Maximum(turbine flow, target flow)) over all downstream links 2. Sum of (inflow+rainfall-evaporation) + Initial storage - End storage
Utilisation over whole simulation period per diversion is defined by the ratio between: 1. Sum of Minimum(actual diverted flow, target diverted flow) over all downstream links 2. Sum of upstream flow
No active SW reservoir and diversion nodes in present schematization
End of file
L-9
Log-file of RIBASIM program Ribalans Version 6.3 , copyrights Delft Hydraulics, the Netherlands =============================================================================================== For suggestions email to : [email protected]
Start reading fixed simulation node and link data
Run-data -------- Run-title ................. Base case User name ................. Planning Unit Hydrological period ....... 1992 - 1 upto 2003 - 12 Initial status ............ Varies for each year Timesteps per year ........ 12 Days per timestep ......... 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31
Table of contents ----------------- Table 1. Average annual water balance : source of water to network Table 2. Average annual water balance : consumptive demand supplied from network Table 3. Average annual water balance : non-consumptive demand (cms), volume passing through the turbines Table 4. Average overall water balance for ground water districts (Mcm) Table 5. Average overall water balance for water district surface water / local runoff (Mcm) Table 6. Average overall water balance for groundwater reservoirs (Mcm)
Table 1. Annual water balance : average source of water (cms) and total source of water (Mcm) to network ========================================================================================================
Comment on the meaning of source of water for :
Fixed inflow : inflow at upstream system boundary Variable inflow : inflow at upstream system boundary SW reservoir storage change (-) : if initial storage > final storage then initial storage minus final storage SW reservoir (partition) rainfall : rainfall on water surface area SW rsv.partition storage change (-): if initial storage > final storage then initial storage minus final storage Fixed irrigation : return flow Public water supply : return flow Variable irrigation : return flow incl. rainfall on the irrigated area Fish ponds : return flow Advanced irrigation : return flow Water district : drainage from local runoff to sw network District discharge : drainage as specified in time series for general district nodes,
L-10
drainage of ground water district nodes Link storage (-) : if initial storage > final storage then initial storage minus final storage Link storage rainfall : rainfall on water surface area Groundwater reservoir change (-) : if initial storage > final storage then initial storage minus final storage
Average Average Total Total Perc. Index Source nodename Description [Mcm] [cms] [Mcm] [cms] [%] ----- ---------------------------------------- -------------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----- 16 Mandau Pws return flow 15.08 0.48 180.92 5.74 0.1 17 Tapung Kanan Pws return flow 5.89 0.19 70.72 2.24 0.0 18 Tapung Kiri Pws return flow 10.84 0.34 130.08 4.12 0.1 20 Siak Pws return flow 31.86 1.01 382.29 12.12 0.2 19 Pku Pws return flow 10.34 0.33 124.12 3.94 0.1
12 Tapung Kanan Fixed irrigation 46.75 1.48 561.02 17.79 0.3 13 Tapung Kiri Fixed irrigation 7.44 0.24 89.28 2.83 0.0 11 Mandau Fixed irrigation 105.19 3.34 1262.30 40.03 0.6 15 Siak Fixed irrigation 466.06 14.78 5592.71 177.34 2.7
1 Tapung Kanan Wad drainage to ntw 2803.80 88.91 33645.60 1066.90 16.2 2 Tapung Kiri Wad drainage to ntw 2824.69 89.57 33896.27 1074.84 16.3 4 Mandau Wad drainage to ntw 3365.29 106.71 40383.48 1280.55 19.4 3 Siak Wad drainage to ntw 4361.16 138.29 52333.93 1659.50 25.1 10 Siak Hilir Wad drainage to ntw 3298.81 104.60 39585.70 1255.25 19.0
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----- Total ............................................................ 17353.20 550.27 208238.44 6603.20 100.0
Table 2. Annual water balance : average consumptive demand (cms) and total consumptive demand (Mcm) supplied from network =========================================================================================================================
Comment on the meaning of consumption of water for :
Variable inflow : local consumption at boundary inflow Fixed irrigation consumption : extraction (from sw and gw) Variable irrigation consumption : extraction (from sw and gw) Advanced irrigation consumption : extraction (from sw and gw) Public water supply consumption : extraction (from sw and gw) SW reservoir (partition) evaporation : evaporation from water surface area SW reservoir (partition) seepage : seepage outof reservoir SW Reservoir storage change (+) : if final storage > initial storage then final storage minus initial storage
L-11
SW reservoir partition storage change (+): if final storage > initial storage then final storage minus initial storage Terminal : outflow at downstream system boundary Loss : outflow via loss nodes (not the flow to GW reservoir) Fish ponds consumption : extraction (from sw and gw) Brack fish pond : extraction (from sw and gw) District extraction : extraction as specified in time series for general district nodes, extraction of ground water district nodes Link storage (+) : if final storage > initial storage then final storage minus initial storage Link storage evaporation : evaporation from water surface area Groundwater reservoir storage change (+) : if final storage > initial storage then final storage minus initial storage
Average Average Total Total Perc. Index Consumpt.nodename Description [Mcm] [cms] [Mcm] [cms] [%] ----- ---------------------------------------- -------------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----- 12 Tapung Kanan Fix.irr.extraction 116.88 3.71 1402.56 44.47 0.7 13 Tapung Kiri Fix.irr.extraction 18.60 0.59 223.20 7.08 0.1 11 Mandau Fix.irr.extraction 262.98 8.34 3155.76 100.07 1.5 15 Siak Fix.irr.extraction 1165.15 36.95 13981.77 443.36 6.7
16 Mandau PWS extraction 20.10 0.64 241.23 7.65 0.1 17 Tapung Kanan PWS extraction 7.86 0.25 94.29 2.99 0.0 18 Tapung Kiri PWS extraction 14.45 0.46 173.44 5.50 0.1 20 Siak PWS extraction 42.48 1.35 509.72 16.16 0.2 19 Pku PWS extraction 13.79 0.44 165.49 5.25 0.1
7 Muara Boundary outflow 15690.91 497.56 188290.92 5970.67 90.4
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----- Total ............................................................ 17353.20 550.27 208238.38 6603.20 100.0
Table 3. Average annual water balance : non-consumptive demand (cms), volume passing through the turbines =========================================================================================================
No hydro-power stations (SW reservoirs and run-of-rivers) in the present configuration
Table 4. average overall water balance for ground water districts (Mcm) =======================================================================
No ground water district in the present configuration
L-12
Table 5. average overall water district balance :water district surface water / local runoff (Mcm) ==================================================================================================
Flow description In- or return flow Out- or consumed flow --------------------------------------------- ------------------ --------------------- 1. Internal runoff ............................. 16653.76 2. Irr.agr. : supply and drainage on WD SW ..... 0.00 0.00 3. PWS : supply and return flow on WD SW .. 0.00 0.00 4. Industry : supply and return flow on WD SW .. 0.00 0.00 5. Drainage to network ......................... 16653.76 ------------------ --------------------- Total ....................................... 16653.76 16653.76
Table 6. average overall water balance for groundwater reservoir (Mcm) ======================================================================
No groundwater reservoirs in the present configuration
End of file
L-13
Lampiran 5 : Neraca Air Hasil DSS-RibasimKondisi Base Case 2030
L-14
Lampiran 5 : Neraca Air Hasil DSS-RibasimKondisi Base Case 2030
Results of RIBASIM program Summary Version 6.3 , copyrights Delft Hydraulics, the Netherlands ============================================================================================= For suggestions email to : [email protected]
Table of contents ----------------- Table 1. Water district node summary Table 2. General district node summary Table 3. Groundwater district node summary Table 4. Fixed, variable and advanced irrigation node summary Table 5. Loss flow nodes summary Table 6. Fishpond nodes summary Table 7. Public water supply nodes summary Table 8. Low flow nodes summary Table 9. Brackish fish pond nodes summary Table 10. Surface water reservoirs and run-of-river nodes power summary Table 11. Average annual energy used for pumping at pumping and groundwater district nodes Table 12. Water utilisation per surface water reservoir and diversion
Run-data -------- Run-title ....................................................... Base case User name ....................................................... Planning Unit Hydrological period ............................................. 1992 - 1 upto 2003 - 12 Initial status .................................................. Varies for each year Timesteps per year .............................................. 12 Number of simulation years ...................................... 12 Number of simulation time steps ................................. 144 Start time step of hydrologic year (= first simulation time step) 1 Number of hydrologic years ...................................... 12 Criteria for failure time step and failure year : 1. If shortage is bigger than a specified percentage of the demand then the time step is accounted as a failure time step (% of demand) 2. If the number of failure time steps within the hydrologic year is equal or bigger than a specified number then the year is accounted as a failure year (# of timesteps)
L-15
For each node type these criteria are specified (% of demand, # of timesteps): 1.Water district node 1. Irrigated agriculture : 0.10 1 2. Public water : 0.10 1 3. Industry : 0.10 1 2.General district node : 0.10 1 3.Groundwater district node : 1. Irrigation : 0.10 1 2. Pws : 0.10 1 4.Fixed, variable and advanced irrigation node : 0.10 1 5.Loss flow node : 0.10 1 6.Fish pond node : 0.10 1 7.Public water supply node : 0.10 1 8.Low flow node : 0.10 1 9.Brackish fish pond node : 0.10 110.Firm energy at SW reservoirs : 0.10 1 Remarks : 1. Values are yearly averages 2. For the number of success time steps and rate all time steps are accounted 3. For the number of success years and rate the hydrologic years are accounted. A hydrologic year starts at the first simulation time step. 4. Number of successive failure years refers to 3 or more successive hydrologic failure years 5. In the tables below only the active nodes are shown 6. Cumulative salt balance is only generated if salt computation is carried out. The salt balance shows the amount of salt (kg/ha) which flushed out (negative value) or built-up in the irrigation area (positive value) over the whole simulation period.
Table 1. Water district node summary ------------------------------------
Table 2. General district node summary --------------------------------------
No active general nodes in present schematization
Table 3. Groundwater district node summary -------------------------------------------
No active groundwater district nodes in present schematization
L-16
Table 4. Fixed, variable and advanced irrigation node summary --------------------------------------------------------------
Success Success Number Yearly average time steps years of suc- ----------------------------------- ------------ ------------ cessive Demand Deficit Demand Deficit number rate number rate failure Node index and name (Mcm) (Mcm) (m3/s) (m3/s) (-) (%) (-) (%) years ------------------------------------------------ -------- -------- -------- -------- ------ ----- ------ ----- ------- 11 Mandau 1358.73 30.40 43.09 0.96 133 92.4 8 66.7 1 12 Tapung Kanan 529.61 1.17 16.79 0.04 142 98.6 11 91.7 0 13 Tapung Kiri 1398.91 106.82 44.36 3.39 116 80.6 4 33.3 2 15 Siak 6779.04 149.80 214.96 4.75 131 91.0 6 50.0 1
Total 10066.29 288.19 319.20 9.14
Table 5. Loss flow nodes summary ---------------------------------
No active loss flow nodes in present schematization
Table 6. Fishpond nodes summary --------------------------------
No active fish pond nodes in present schematization
Table 7. Public water supply nodes summary -------------------------------------------
Yearly average Success timest. Success years Number of ------------------------------- --------------- --------------- successive Demand Deficit Demand Deficit number rate number rate failure Max.shortage Node index and name (Mcm) (Mcm) (m3/s) (m3/s) (-) (%) (-) (%) years (% of demand) ----------------------------------------------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ---------- ------------- 16 Mandau 218.66 0.10 6.93 0.00 143 99.3 11 91.7 0 6.7 17 Tapung Kanan 81.70 0.00 2.59 0.00 144 100.0 12 100.0 0 0.0 18 Tapung Kiri 139.67 0.10 4.43 0.00 143 99.3 11 91.7 0 10.7 19 Pku 69.08 0.00 2.19 0.00 144 100.0 12 100.0 0 0.0 20 Siak 204.37 0.00 6.48 0.00 144 100.0 12 100.0 0 0.0
Total 713.49 0.20 22.62 0.01
L-17
Table 8. Low flow nodes summary --------------------------------
No active low flow nodes in present schematization
Table 9. Brackish fish pond nodes summary ------------------------------------------
No active brackish fish pond nodes in present schematization
Table 10. SW reservoirs and run-of-river nodes power summary ------------------------------------------------------------
No active SW reservoir with power station and run-of-river nodes in present schematization
Table 11. Average annual energy used for pumping at pumping and groundwater district nodes ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No pumping and groundwater district nodes in present schematization
Table 12. Water utilisation per SW reservoir and diversion ----------------------------------------------------------
Utilisation over whole simulation period per SW reservoir is defined by the ratio between: 1. Sum of Minimum(downstream flow, Maximum(turbine flow, target flow)) over all downstream links 2. Sum of (inflow+rainfall-evaporation) + Initial storage - End storage
Utilisation over whole simulation period per diversion is defined by the ratio between: 1. Sum of Minimum(actual diverted flow, target diverted flow) over all downstream links 2. Sum of upstream flow
No active SW reservoir and diversion nodes in present schematization
End of file
L-18
Log-file of RIBASIM program Ribalans Version 6.3 , copyrights Delft Hydraulics, the Netherlands =============================================================================================== For suggestions email to : [email protected]
Start reading fixed simulation node and link data
Run-data -------- Run-title ................. Base case User name ................. Planning Unit Hydrological period ....... 1992 - 1 upto 2003 - 12 Initial status ............ Varies for each year Timesteps per year ........ 12 Days per timestep ......... 31 28 31 30 31 30 31 31 30 31 30 31
Table of contents ----------------- Table 1. Average annual water balance : source of water to network Table 2. Average annual water balance : consumptive demand supplied from network Table 3. Average annual water balance : non-consumptive demand (cms), volume passing through the turbines Table 4. Average overall water balance for ground water districts (Mcm) Table 5. Average overall water balance for water district surface water / local runoff (Mcm) Table 6. Average overall water balance for groundwater reservoirs (Mcm)
Table 1. Annual water balance : average source of water (cms) and total source of water (Mcm) to network ========================================================================================================
Comment on the meaning of source of water for :
Fixed inflow : inflow at upstream system boundary Variable inflow : inflow at upstream system boundary SW reservoir storage change (-) : if initial storage > final storage then initial storage minus final storage SW reservoir (partition) rainfall : rainfall on water surface area SW rsv.partition storage change (-): if initial storage > final storage then initial storage minus final storage Fixed irrigation : return flow Public water supply : return flow Variable irrigation : return flow incl. rainfall on the irrigated area Fish ponds : return flow Advanced irrigation : return flow Water district : drainage from local runoff to sw network District discharge : drainage as specified in time series for general district nodes,
L-19
drainage of ground water district nodes Link storage (-) : if initial storage > final storage then initial storage minus final storage Link storage rainfall : rainfall on water surface area Groundwater reservoir change (-) : if initial storage > final storage then initial storage minus final storage
Average Average Total Total Perc. Index Source nodename Description [Mcm] [cms] [Mcm] [cms] [%] ----- ---------------------------------------- -------------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----- 16 Mandau Pws return flow 163.92 5.20 1967.06 62.37 0.8 17 Tapung Kanan Pws return flow 61.28 1.94 735.32 23.32 0.3 18 Tapung Kiri Pws return flow 104.68 3.32 1256.15 39.83 0.5 20 Siak Pws return flow 153.28 4.86 1839.30 58.32 0.7 19 Pku Pws return flow 51.81 1.64 621.72 19.71 0.2
12 Tapung Kanan Fixed irrigation 211.38 6.70 2536.53 80.43 1.0 13 Tapung Kiri Fixed irrigation 516.83 16.39 6202.02 196.66 2.4 11 Mandau Fixed irrigation 531.33 16.85 6375.96 202.18 2.5 15 Siak Fixed irrigation 2651.70 84.08 31820.38 1009.02 12.6
1 Tapung Kanan Wad drainage to ntw 2803.80 88.91 33645.60 1066.90 13.3 2 Tapung Kiri Wad drainage to ntw 2824.69 89.57 33896.27 1074.84 13.4 4 Mandau Wad drainage to ntw 3365.29 106.71 40383.48 1280.55 15.9 3 Siak Wad drainage to ntw 4361.16 138.29 52333.93 1659.50 20.7 10 Siak Hilir Wad drainage to ntw 3298.81 104.60 39585.70 1255.25 15.6
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----- Total ............................................................ 21099.96 669.08 253199.45 8028.90 100.0
Table 2. Annual water balance : average consumptive demand (cms) and total consumptive demand (Mcm) supplied from network =========================================================================================================================
Comment on the meaning of consumption of water for :
Variable inflow : local consumption at boundary inflow Fixed irrigation consumption : extraction (from sw and gw) Variable irrigation consumption : extraction (from sw and gw) Advanced irrigation consumption : extraction (from sw and gw) Public water supply consumption : extraction (from sw and gw) SW reservoir (partition) evaporation : evaporation from water surface area SW reservoir (partition) seepage : seepage outof reservoir SW Reservoir storage change (+) : if final storage > initial storage then final storage minus initial storage
L-20
SW reservoir partition storage change (+): if final storage > initial storage then final storage minus initial storage Terminal : outflow at downstream system boundary Loss : outflow via loss nodes (not the flow to GW reservoir) Fish ponds consumption : extraction (from sw and gw) Brack fish pond : extraction (from sw and gw) District extraction : extraction as specified in time series for general district nodes, extraction of ground water district nodes Link storage (+) : if final storage > initial storage then final storage minus initial storage Link storage evaporation : evaporation from water surface area Groundwater reservoir storage change (+) : if final storage > initial storage then final storage minus initial storage
Average Average Total Total Perc. Index Consumpt.nodename Description [Mcm] [cms] [Mcm] [cms] [%] ----- ---------------------------------------- -------------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----- 12 Tapung Kanan Fix.irr.extraction 528.44 16.76 6341.34 201.08 2.5 13 Tapung Kiri Fix.irr.extraction 1292.09 40.97 15505.06 491.66 6.1 11 Mandau Fix.irr.extraction 1328.33 42.12 15939.91 505.45 6.3 15 Siak Fix.irr.extraction 6629.24 210.21 79550.88 2522.54 31.4
16 Mandau PWS extraction 218.56 6.93 2622.74 83.17 1.0 17 Tapung Kanan PWS extraction 81.70 2.59 980.43 31.09 0.4 18 Tapung Kiri PWS extraction 139.57 4.43 1674.86 53.11 0.7 20 Siak PWS extraction 204.37 6.48 2452.40 77.77 1.0 19 Pku PWS extraction 69.08 2.19 828.96 26.29 0.3
7 Muara Boundary outflow 10608.57 336.40 127302.80 4036.75 50.3
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----- Total ............................................................ 21099.95 669.07 253199.38 8028.90 100.0
Table 3. Average annual water balance : non-consumptive demand (cms), volume passing through the turbines =========================================================================================================
No hydro-power stations (SW reservoirs and run-of-rivers) in the present configuration
Table 4. average overall water balance for ground water districts (Mcm) =======================================================================
No ground water district in the present configuration
L-21
Table 5. average overall water district balance :water district surface water / local runoff (Mcm) ==================================================================================================
Flow description In- or return flow Out- or consumed flow --------------------------------------------- ------------------ --------------------- 1. Internal runoff ............................. 16653.76 2. Irr.agr. : supply and drainage on WD SW ..... 0.00 0.00 3. PWS : supply and return flow on WD SW .. 0.00 0.00 4. Industry : supply and return flow on WD SW .. 0.00 0.00 5. Drainage to network ......................... 16653.76 ------------------ --------------------- Total ....................................... 16653.76 16653.76
Table 6. average overall water balance for groundwater reservoir (Mcm) ======================================================================
No groundwater reservoirs in the present configuration
End of file
L-22
