LAMINOPLASTY FINAL
-
Upload
sanjoy-biswas -
Category
Documents
-
view
20 -
download
0
Transcript of LAMINOPLASTY FINAL
![Page 1: LAMINOPLASTY FINAL](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051521/5877db0f1a28abaa6c8b6363/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
CLINICAL OUTCOMES AFTER OPEN-DOOR LAMINOPLASTY IN COMPRESSIVE CERVICAL MYELOPATHY - 20 CASES
DR.SANJOY BISWAS MS(ORTHO)SPINE FELLOW (GERMANY), SPINE FELLOW (SOUTH KOREA) DR.ABRAR AHMEDHEAD OF THE DEPARTMENT
DEPARETMENT OF SPINE SURGERYAPOLLO GLENEAGLES HOSPITAL, KOLKATA
CONCORD-2016, KOLKATA
![Page 2: LAMINOPLASTY FINAL](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051521/5877db0f1a28abaa6c8b6363/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
INTRODUCTIONCircumferential narrowing of the spinal canal causes static compression over the spinal cord.
Movement of the cervical spine places the spinal cord at risk of injury secondary to dynamic forces, such as buckling of the ligamentum flavum in extension and impingement from a disc-osteophyte in flexion
Diameters less than 12 mm were found to be associated with an increased risk of developing myelopathy
Abnormalities in the corticospinal and spinocerebellar tracts lead to early lower extremity findings of ataxia, spasticity, and paresis.
As the disease progresses, upper extremity symptoms develop, with loss of strength and fine motor abilities.
Gait and sphincter disturbances may develop as the disease progresses
Operative treatment for myelopathy is indicated for patients with progressive disease.
![Page 3: LAMINOPLASTY FINAL](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051521/5877db0f1a28abaa6c8b6363/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
SYSTEMATIC APPROACH
Components
Correct DiagnosisBest Treatment
complaints
ListenTouchThink
Obtain Imaging Studies
Interpretation and Synthesis
1
2
3
4
5
![Page 4: LAMINOPLASTY FINAL](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051521/5877db0f1a28abaa6c8b6363/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
RETROSPECTIVE STUDY
Materials and methods
Patients who had kyphotic deformity, radiological instability, or previous spinal surgery were excluded .
Patients’ neurological functions and improvement were evaluated with Nurick score.
Preoperative and postoperative kyphosis was evaluated using the sagittal tangent method.
Preoperative and postoperative complications were recorded.
![Page 5: LAMINOPLASTY FINAL](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051521/5877db0f1a28abaa6c8b6363/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Study period
20 patients with cervical myelopathy were treated with open-door laminoplasty between 2012-2015
![Page 6: LAMINOPLASTY FINAL](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051521/5877db0f1a28abaa6c8b6363/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Study area
![Page 7: LAMINOPLASTY FINAL](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051521/5877db0f1a28abaa6c8b6363/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Sample size: 20
![Page 8: LAMINOPLASTY FINAL](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051521/5877db0f1a28abaa6c8b6363/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
The goal of laminoplasty is to reposition the laminae to expand the spinal canal, allowing the spinal cord to migrate posteriorly.
![Page 9: LAMINOPLASTY FINAL](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051521/5877db0f1a28abaa6c8b6363/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
SURGICAL PROCEDURE
OPEN-DOOR LAMINOPLASTY
BEAUTY LIES IN SIMPLICITYHirabayashi K, Miyakawa J, Satomi K: Maruyama T, Wakano K. Operative Results and postoperative progression of ossification among patients with ossification of cervical posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine 6: 354-364, 1981
Provide surgical expansion of the spinal canal.
1) A direct local decompression effect 2) A total decompression effect by dorsal shift of the spinal cord away from the ventral compressing elements.
![Page 10: LAMINOPLASTY FINAL](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051521/5877db0f1a28abaa6c8b6363/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
SURGICAL PROCEDURE OPEN-DOOR LAMINOPLASTY
NUMBER OF PTSTITANIUM MINIPLATES AND SCREWS 17
PEEK RELIEVE [GLOBUS] 03
![Page 11: LAMINOPLASTY FINAL](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051521/5877db0f1a28abaa6c8b6363/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
NEUROLOGICAL ASSESMENT
NURICKS SCALE WAS USED PREOPERATIVELY AND AT LAST
FOLLOW UP
![Page 12: LAMINOPLASTY FINAL](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051521/5877db0f1a28abaa6c8b6363/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
NURICKS GRADE
0- Radiculopathy 1- Myelopathy+, No gait disturbance 2- Mild gait dist/ carry on with daily
activity 3- Mod gait dist- works without
assistance 4- Severe gait dist-works with
assistance 5- BedriddenNurick S: The pathogenesis of the spinal cord disorder associated with cervicalspondylosis. Brain 1972;95:87-100
![Page 13: LAMINOPLASTY FINAL](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051521/5877db0f1a28abaa6c8b6363/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
RESULTS
We reviewed results from our hospitalfor patients with cervical myelopathywho underwent laminoplasty.
Postoperative follow-ups were performed at two months after the procedure and six months thereafter.
![Page 14: LAMINOPLASTY FINAL](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051521/5877db0f1a28abaa6c8b6363/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Serial no Age (Yr) OT time[min]
Blood loss[ml]
Nurick Grade Pre-op
Nurick Grade Post-op
Complications
Follow-Up(mnt.)
Sagittal, Alignment pre op
Sagittal Alignment post op
1 57 180 230 3 2 36 6 112 54 160 150 2 1 32 7 123 49 150 180 2 1 30 9 124 64 140 200 2 1 30 7 125 56 220 450 5 3 Dural tear 28 4 106 59 150 230 3 2 28 6 117 63 170 250 4 2 27 5 108 58 160 200 3 1 25 6 119 66 200 350 5 4 Transient C5
palsy23
4 9
10 77 180 300 4 3 21 6 1011 65 150 250 3 2 20 6 1012 64 150 200 4 2 18 5 1113 53 100 140 2 1 18 9 1314 58 120 190 2 1 18 7 1215 58 210 350 3 1 Sup.infection 14
6 11
16 36 120 150 2 1 14 8 1217 60 130 180 2 1 14 4 918 61 110 150 4 2 12 9 1319 72 150 200 2 1 12 7 1220 61 150 150 3 1 6 6 11
Patient demographic data, and clinical and sagittal alignment outcomes
![Page 15: LAMINOPLASTY FINAL](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051521/5877db0f1a28abaa6c8b6363/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
M:F 18:2 (9:1) Mean age: 59.55 yrs (36-77 yrs)
![Page 16: LAMINOPLASTY FINAL](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051521/5877db0f1a28abaa6c8b6363/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
MRI FINDINGS OPLL (Continuous/ Mixed)
06 MSCS (Multisegmental cervical spondylosis)
07 Lig flavum hypertrophy
04 Cord changes
03( 11 pts had more than one pathology
![Page 17: LAMINOPLASTY FINAL](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051521/5877db0f1a28abaa6c8b6363/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Duration of symptoms (months)
Number of patients
0-4 24-12 612-36 636-72 272-96 4
![Page 18: LAMINOPLASTY FINAL](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051521/5877db0f1a28abaa6c8b6363/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
NURICKSGRADE
PREOPERATIVE(No. of pts)
POSTOPERATIVE(No. of pts)
GRADE 1 0 11GRADE 2 8 5GRADE 3 6 3GRADE 4 4 1GRADE 5 2 0
NURICKS GRADE
![Page 19: LAMINOPLASTY FINAL](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051521/5877db0f1a28abaa6c8b6363/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
The mean preoperative Nurick grade was 3 (range, 2 to 5) post op1.6(range1 to 4)
![Page 20: LAMINOPLASTY FINAL](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051521/5877db0f1a28abaa6c8b6363/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
The mean operating time was 155 minutes .
Mean blood loss was 225 cc.
Pre- and last postoperative kyphotic evaluation was measured using the sagittal tangent method [6.6 TO 11.2 DEGREE]
Wang MY, Shah S, Green BA. Clinical outcomes following cervical laminoplasty for 204 patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Surg Neurol 62:487-493, 2004
Visual analog scale (VAS) and were compared -improved [ 8 TO 2 ]
![Page 21: LAMINOPLASTY FINAL](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051521/5877db0f1a28abaa6c8b6363/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
CASE-1
Male/36 yr
![Page 22: LAMINOPLASTY FINAL](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051521/5877db0f1a28abaa6c8b6363/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
![Page 23: LAMINOPLASTY FINAL](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051521/5877db0f1a28abaa6c8b6363/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
![Page 24: LAMINOPLASTY FINAL](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051521/5877db0f1a28abaa6c8b6363/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
CASE-2
Male/72 yr
![Page 25: LAMINOPLASTY FINAL](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051521/5877db0f1a28abaa6c8b6363/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
![Page 26: LAMINOPLASTY FINAL](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051521/5877db0f1a28abaa6c8b6363/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
![Page 27: LAMINOPLASTY FINAL](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051521/5877db0f1a28abaa6c8b6363/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
![Page 28: LAMINOPLASTY FINAL](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051521/5877db0f1a28abaa6c8b6363/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
CASE-3
Male/60 yr
![Page 29: LAMINOPLASTY FINAL](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051521/5877db0f1a28abaa6c8b6363/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
![Page 30: LAMINOPLASTY FINAL](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051521/5877db0f1a28abaa6c8b6363/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
AGHL 20[18/2] 18 59.55 OT,BL,HS,NURIC,VAS,PC
155MIN,225 ML,5 DAYS ,1.65 , VAS-1, COMPLICATIONS -3,
![Page 31: LAMINOPLASTY FINAL](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051521/5877db0f1a28abaa6c8b6363/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Excellent: All preoperative symptoms relieved; abnormal findings improved.
Good: Minimal persistence of preoperative symptoms; abnormal findings unchanged or improved
Fair: Definite relief of some preoperative symptoms; other symptoms unchanged or slightly improved
Poor: Symptoms and signs unchanged or exacerbated
Odom’s criteria
Outcome assessment was done using Odom’s criteria and using these criteria, 20 patients had a good to fair outcome.
Odom GL, Finney W, Woodhall B. Cervical disc lesions. JAMA 1958;166:223-8.
![Page 32: LAMINOPLASTY FINAL](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051521/5877db0f1a28abaa6c8b6363/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
COMPLICATIONS
• CSF leak - Repaired • Superficial wound infection• Transient C5 palsy(Resolved)
Fortunately, the majorities resolve within 3–24Post-operative months without conservative treatment alone.
Radcliff KE, Limthongkul W, Kepler CK, Sidhu GD, Anderson DG, Rihn JA,et al. Cervical laminectomy width and spinal cord drift are risk factors forpostoperative C5 palsy. J Spinal Disord Tech 2014;27:86‑92.
![Page 33: LAMINOPLASTY FINAL](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051521/5877db0f1a28abaa6c8b6363/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
In Gu et al. series, C5 root palsies occurred in 3.1% of double‑door laminoplasty, 4.5% of open‑door laminoplasty, and 11.3% of laminectomy.
Gu et al. also identified multiple risk factors for developing C5 palsiesfollowing posterior surgery; male gender, ossification of the posterior longitudinalligament (OPLL), narrower foramina, laminectomy, and marked spinal corddrift. Miller et al. also identified an average $1918 increased cost for physical/occupational therapy for patients with C5 palsies
![Page 34: LAMINOPLASTY FINAL](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051521/5877db0f1a28abaa6c8b6363/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
![Page 35: LAMINOPLASTY FINAL](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051521/5877db0f1a28abaa6c8b6363/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Factors predisposing to C5 palsies included;
More narrowed width of the intervertebral foramen (WIF),
Anterior protrusion of the superior articular process (APSAP), A high‑signal intensity zone C3‑C5 (HIZ: C3‑C5), and OPLL; ofinterest, both groups demonstrated comparable posteriorshift of the spinal cord (PSSC)
C5 root palsy following expansile open‑door laminoplasty
Wu FL, Sun Y, Pan SF, Zhang L, Liu ZJ. Risk factors associated with upper extremity palsy after expansive open‑door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy. Spine J 2014;14:909‑15.
![Page 36: LAMINOPLASTY FINAL](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051521/5877db0f1a28abaa6c8b6363/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
The literature lacks randomized control study comparing laminectomy and laminoplasty, laminectomy with fusion and laminoplasty, or anterior corpectomy with fusion and laminoplasty.
Laminoplasty as practiced today, with early postoperative mobilization, may be able to show better stability than laminectomy and better preserved ROM than anterior fusion.
![Page 37: LAMINOPLASTY FINAL](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051521/5877db0f1a28abaa6c8b6363/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
CONCLUSIONS Laminoplasty is a valuable procedure in multi-
segmental compression
For best results- should be performed before cord changes develop
![Page 38: LAMINOPLASTY FINAL](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022051521/5877db0f1a28abaa6c8b6363/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
THANK YOU………