Lakota School District 2009 - 2010 Report Card

8/8/2019 Lakota School District 2009 - 2010 Report Card

1/7

To meet a test indicatorfor grades3-8 and 10, atleast 75%ofstudents testedmustscoreproficientorhigher

on that test. Other indicator requirements are:11thgradeOhio GraduationTests,85%; AttendanceRate, 93%; Graduation Rate, 90%.

StateIndicators

2009-2010 School Year Report Card

The state requirement is 75 percent








3rd Grade Achievement

1. Reading2. Mathematics

4th Grade Achievement3. Reading4. Mathematics

5th Grade Achievement5. Reading6. Mathematics7. Science



8th Grade Achievement12. Reading13. Mathematics14. Science

Ohio Graduation Tests (10th Grade)

15. Reading16. Mathematics17. Writing18. Science19. Social Studies


20. Reading21. Mathematics22. Writing23. Science24. Social Studies

Attendance Rate25. All Grades

2008-09 Graduation Rate26. District



The six designations are Excellent with Distinction Excellent Effective Continuous Improvement Academic Watch Academic Emergency

Value-AddedAdequate Yearly Progress

PerformanceIndex

Indicators

The District Report Card for the2009-2010 school year shows theprogress districts have madebased on four measures of performance.

The combination of the fourmeasures is the basis forassigning state designations to districts, buildings andcommunity schools.

Your DistrictsDesignation: Number of StateIndicators

Met out of 26Performance

Index

StateIndicators PerformanceIndex

Value-AddedMeasure

Your District2009-2010

Similar Districts2009-2010

State2009-2010

Percentage of Students at and above the Proficient Leve

On the Web: reportcard.ohio.gov

Value-AddedMeasure

StateIndicators

DistrictImprovement(0-120 points)

AYP

*

**

Any result at or above the state standard is indicated by a .

SimilarDistrictsare basedon comparingdemographic, socioeconomicand geographicfactors. Cumulativeresults forstudents whotook thetestsas 10thor 11th graders.***-- = Not Calculated/Not Displayed when there are fewer than 10 in the group.

97.9 %95.7 %97.6 %94.5 %96.3 %

96.2 %

93.1 %

IRN # 046110

Excellent withDistinction 26 104.2

Met

OK

Lakota Local School District5572 Princeton Rd, Liberty Township, OH 45011-9726 - Butler County

Current Superintendent: William M. Taylor (513) 874-5505

91.2 %86.9 %

88.5 %86.7 %

85.4 %83.9 %85.5 %

93.8 %91.7 %

92.3 %89.5 %

92.7 %85.6 %83.2 %

94.7 %91.2 %93.9 %87.3 %92.0 %

90.9 %87.8 %

78.4 %76.9 %

90.8 %88.0 %

81 %76.2 %

86.2 %83.5 %85.7 %

71.8 %67 %

69.9 %

84.1 %77.4 %

94.0 %90.3 %

80.2 %71.1 %

91.4 %86.6 %

80.9 %69.2 %64.8 %

92.2 %85.1 %82.7 %

83 %80.4 %84.1 %73 %

79.6 %

93.8 %92.9 %93.8 %88.6 %92.7 %

91.6 %89.2 %93.2 %85.1 %88.7 %

94.3 %

83 %

97.3 %96.8 %97.8 %95.2 %96.7 %

95.8 %

96.0 %

+ = above


2/7

2

All students in the district for a full academic year are included in the results.

The StateIndicators are

based on stateassessments, as wellas on attendance andgraduation rates.To earn an indicator for Achievement orGraduation Tests, atleast75% of studentsmust reach proficientor above for the givenassessment.For the 11th grade OhioGraduationTestsindicators,a cumulative85%passagerate for eachassessmentis required.

StateIndicators

Your Districts Assessment Results Over Time

Cumulative results for students who took the tests as 10th or 11th graders.*

S t a t e S t a n

d a r d

- 7 5 %

Reading Mathematics

100%

75%

50%

25%

0%

3rd Grade Achievement

07-08 08-09 09-1007-08 08-09 09-10

88.4 88.1 91.2 87.6 89.4 86.9

--------------------------------------

S t a t e S t a n

d a r d

- 7 5 %

Reading Mathematics

100%

75%

50%

25%

0%

4th Grade Achievement

07-08 08-09 09-1007-08 08-09 09-10

92.1 89.9 88.5 84.9 87.9 86.7

--------------------------------------

S t a t e S t a n

d a r

d -

7 5 %

Reading Mathematics

100%

75%

50%

25%

0%

Science


07-08 08-09 09-10 07-08 08-09 09-1007-08 08-09 09-10

86.7 87.3 85.4 79.1 79.7 83.9 85.0 86.8 85.5

------------------------------------------------------

S t a t e S t a n

d a r d -

7 5 %

Reading Mathematics

100%

75%

50%

25%

0%


07-08 08-09 09-1007-08 08-09 09-10

9 2.8 93 .5 9 3. 8 90 .4 90 .9 9 1. 7

--------------------------------

S t a t e S t a n

d a r d -

7 5 %

Reading Mathematics

100%

75%

50%

25%

0%


07-08 08-09 09-1007-08 08-09 09-10

91.6 91.5 92.3 82.9 86.6 89.5

--------------------------------

S t a t e S t a n

d a r

d -

7 5 %

Reading Mathematics

100%

75%

50%

25%

0%

Science


07-08 08-09 09-10 07-08 08-09 09-1007-08 08-09 09-10

93.6 87.9 9 2.7 88.7 86.7 8 5.6 82.2 79.7 83.2

------------------------------------------------------

S t a t e S t a n d a r d -

7 5 %100%

75%

50%

25%

0%


Reading WritingMathematics Science SocialStudies

07-08 08-09 09-1007-08 08-09 09-1007-08 08-09 09-1007-08 08-09 09-1007-08 08-09 09-10

93.6 9 5.4 9 4.7 89.4 9 3.8 91.2 94.1 9 7.2 93.9 86.5 9 1.8 87.3 89.9 94.0 92.0

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

S t a t e S t a n d a r d -

8 5 %100%

75%

50%

25%

0%


Reading WritingMathematics Science SocialStudies

*

07-08 08-09 09-1007-08 08-09 09-1007-08 08-09 09-1007-08 08-09 09-1007-08 08-09 09-10

97.0 97.7 97.9 95.3 9 6.4 95.7 97.7 9 8.0 97.6 94.4 9 3.9 9 4.5 95.5 96.5 96.3

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Lakota Local School District, Butler County


3/7

Overall Composite Scores reflect grade level and overall composite

ratings for the 2009-2010 school year.

Value-Added Measure

Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8

Reading

Mathematics

On the Web: reportcard.ohio.gov

Your districtsValue-Added rating represents the progress yourdistrict has made with its students since last school year.In contrast, achievement scores represent students performance at apoint in time. A score of Above indicates greater than one year of

progress has been achieved; Met indicates one year of progress has beenachieved; Below indicates less than one year of progress has been achieved.

Value-AddedMeasure

-

+AboveExpected Growth

MetExpected Growth

BelowExpected Growth

=

=

=

Legend

Performance Index

Performance Level Across Grades3-8 and 10 for all Tested Subjects

(Includes every student enrolled inthe district for a full academic year)

X =WeightPercentage Points

Performance Index Calculationsfor the 2009-2010 School Year

Untested

Limited

Basic

Proficient

Accelerated

Advanced

X

X

X

X

X

X

=

=

=

=

=

=

The PerformanceIndex reflects theachievementofeverystudentenrolled for the fullacademic

year. The Performance Index is a

weighted average that includes all tested subjects and grades anduntested students.Thegreatestweight is given to advanced scores(1.2); the weights decrease for eachperformance level and a weight of zero is given to untested students.This results in a scale from 0 to 120points. The Performance Index can bcompared across years to showdistrict achievement trends.

PerformanceIndex

2009-2010 2008-2009 2007-2008

Performance Index Over Time

Your Districts Performance Index

0.2

3.0

7.8

27.1

27.5

34.4

0.9

4.7

27.1

30.3

41.3

104.2 103.6 102.9104.2


+- -

+ + + +

0.00.0

0.3

0.6

1.0

1.1

1.2


4/7

4

Grades 3-8 and 10

Readingand

Mathematics

Adequate YearlyProgress

A l lS t u

d e n t s

P e r c e n

t P r o

f i c

i e n

t

P e r c e n

t T e s

t e d

E c o n o m

i c a l l y

D i s a d v

a n t a g e

d

A s i a n / P

a c i f i c

I s l a n d e

r

B l a c k ,

n o n - H i

s p a n i c

A m e r i c

a nI n d i a n

/ A l a s k a

N a t i v e

H i s p a n

i c

M u l t i -

R a c i a l

W h i t e ,

n o n - H i

s p a n i c

S t u d e n

t sw i t h

D i s a b i

l i t i e s

L i m i t e d

E n g l i s h

P r o f i c i

e n t

Reading

Mathematics

Reading

Mathematics

Graduation Rate*

Attendance Rate*

Legend

Not applicable.

NR

N/A

Met

Not Met

Not Required This indicator was not evaluated for this subgroup because the subgroup size was smaller than the minimum number needed to achieve a statisti-cally reliable result. 30 students is the minimum size for the proficiency and non-test indicators, while 40 is the minimum size for the participation rate indicators.

This subgroup met AYP for this indicator with its current year, two-year combined, Safe Harbor, or growth measure results.

This subgroup did not meet AYP for this indicator.

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)

ReadingProficiency:

MathematicsProficiency:

ReadingParticipation:

MathematicsParticipation:

AttendanceRate:

AYP Determinatioby Indicator

GraduationRate:

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is a federally required measure. Every schoolanddistrict must meet AYPgoals that are set for Readingand Mathematics

Proficiency and Participation, Attendance Rate, and GraduationRate. These goals are applied to ten student groups: All Students,Economically Disadvantaged Students, Asian/Pacific IslanderStudents, Black, non-Hispanic Students, American Indian/AlaskaNative Students, Hispanic Students, Multi-Racial Students, White,

non-Hispanic Students, Students with Disabilities (IEP), and Students withLimited English Proficiency (LEP). If any one of these groups does not meetAYP in Reading or Mathematics Proficiency, or in Participation, AttendanceRate, or Graduation Rate, then the school or district does not meet AYP.Not meeting AYP for consecutive years will have both federal and stateconsequences. Federal consequences could include a school or district beingidentified for improvement. State consequences could include a reductionin the states rating designation.

AYP

AYP Determinationby Subgroup

AYPDetermination

for Your District:

This legend explains terms used in the above chart that describe whether each student group met this years AYP goals.For test indicators, AYP can be met in one of four ways:

1) meeting the AYP targets with current year results;2) meeting the AYP targets with two-year combined results;3) meeting the improvement requirements of Safe Harbor;4) meeting the AYP targets with projected results.

For non-test indicators, AYP can be met in one of three ways:

1) meeting the AYP targets with current year results;2) meeting the AYP targets with two-year combined results;3) making improvement over the previous year.

*The non-test indicators used for overall AYP (Attendance Rate and Graduation Rate)are evaluated only for the All Students subgroup.

2008-2009Graduation Rate Information

The disaggregated graduation rates of your district are provided forinformational purposes only andare notused for your AYPdetermination.

HispanicWhite,

non-HispanicLimited English

Proficient Multi-RacialStudents with

Disabilities

Black,non-Hispanic

Asian orPacific Islander

American Indian/ Alaska Native

Econ.Disadvtgd

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met


Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

NR

NR

NR

NR

NR

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

Met

-- 89.7% 81.1% 85.7%

86.5% 70% 85.3% 89.8% >95%


5/7

Under the federalNo Child Left BehindAct, states are

required to reportcertain data aboutschoolsandteachers.Data presentedhereare for reportingpurposes only andare not used in thecomputation of thestate designation fordistricts andschools.

-- = Not Calculated/Not Displayed when there are fewer than 10 in the group.

ReadingWritingMathematicsScienceSocial Studies





Black,non-Hispanic

AmericanIndian/

Alaska Native

Asian orPacific

IslanderHispanic Multi-Racial

White,non-Hispanic

Non-DisabledStudents

Studentswith

DisabilitiesMigrant

Non-Econ.

Disadvtgd

Econ.Disadvtgd

LimitedEnglish

ProficientFemale Male

Your District's Percentage of Students at Each Performance Level

Percentage of Students Scoring Limited

Percentage of Students Scoring Basic

Percentage of Students Scoring Proficient

Percentage of Students Scoring Accelerated

Percentage of Students Scoring Advanced

State and Federally Required District Information

Number of Limited English Proficient StudentsExcluded from Accountability Calculations

All Schools inYour District

High-PovertySchools Locatedin Your District*

Low-PovertySchools Locatedin Your District*

Percentage of teachers with at least a Bachelors Degree

Percentage of teachers with at least a Masters Degree

Percentage of core academic subject elementary and secondaryclasses not taught by highly qualified teachers

Percentage of core academic subject elementary and secondaryclasses taught by properly certified teachers

Percentage of core academic subject elementary and secondary classes taught byteachers with temporary, conditional or long-term substitute certification/licensure

*High-poverty schools arethoserankedin thetop quartilebasedon thepercentageof economicallydisadvantagedstudents.Low-poverty schoolsare those ranked in thebottomquartile based on thepercentageof economicallydisadvantaged students. A districtmay havebuildingsin bothquartiles, in justone quartileor in neitherquartile.

Federally Required School Teacher Information

-- = Not Calculated/Not Displayed when there are fewer than 10 in the group.

Average DailyStudent

Enrollment

Black,non-

Hispanic

AmericanIndian or

Alaska Native

Asian orPacific

IslanderHispanic Multi-Racial

White,non-

Hispanic

Studentswith

DisabilitiesMigrantEconomicallyDisadvantaged

LimitedEnglish

Proficient

Your Districts Students 2009-2010

35

17433 9.4% 0.1% 5.5% 3.3% 4.2% 77.5% 13.9% 5.4% 9.4% --


100.0

68.4

0.0

99.5

0.0

0.0

--

--

12.712.820.027.813.0

7.7--

7.7----

4.10.02.61.32.6

8.37.3

11.34.32.4

3.90.05.55.45.7

2.00.62.41.21.9

1.70.22.11.01.5

15.96.4

19.715.117.6

----------

1.90.32.41.31.8

9.63.6

11.88.19.6

2.30.53.71.92.6

10.29.1

13.15.89.1

3.61.03.72.42.9

15.4--

7.7----

3.53.96.9

11.00.0

12.19.8

18.127.617.1

10.25.6

14.919.9

5.7

4.74.06.59.63.8

4.23.36.7

10.13.7

22.728.426.337.223.1

----------

4.44.46.5

10.14.1

15.011.820.328.013.3

12.821.217.026.318.2

4.93.38.9

13.95.9

6.87.27.9

11.14.7

39.753.233.331.635.7

38.5--

30.8----

29.228.621.223.8

9.1

42.631.731.326.731.7

35.330.632.421.711.4

28.834.824.322.813.4

30.035.625.324.015.5

35.645.027.121.824.1

----------

29.035.024.322.714.1

40.046.233.131.131.3

40.542.430.832.124.2

28.932.726.226.119.3

32.139.824.821.613.4

23.032.117.220.018.8

15.4--

15.4----

32.163.622.225.118.2

24.948.813.624.119.5

26.258.317.025.314.3

32.459.222.728.817.7

32.760.123.028.918.1

13.07.38.4

11.214.8

----------

32.458.622.628.717.6

22.236.716.319.219.3

25.324.218.221.824.2

30.561.722.428.519.6

31.450.421.026.316.2

16.41.3

18.212.624.0

8.20.6

11.48.18.4

23.1--

38.5----

31.13.9

47.238.870.1

12.12.4

25.717.229.3

24.35.6

30.327.762.9

32.11.5

44.137.663.2

31.40.7

42.936.061.2

12.812.818.514.820.4

----------

32.31.7

44.337.362.4

13.31.8

18.613.626.5

11.23.0

21.014.124.2

33.41.9

38.829.552.6

26.11.6

42.638.662.9

0.0 -- 0.0

100.0

68.4

0.0

99.5


6/7

6

Every school in SI has to create animprovement plan. If a school in SIreceives federal funds, it may have tooffer Public School Choice and/orSupplemental Educational Services.Being in SI for three or more yearsrequires more extensive correctiveactions and, eventually, restructuring.

Generally, a school will enter SchoolImprovement (SI) after missing AYP for two consecutive years, and it canexit SI only after meeting AYP for twoconsecutive years.

Name of the School & Years in Improvement

Name of Schools Identified for Improvement and Years in Improvement Status

Schools in School Improvement

The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP),oftenreferred toasThe Nations ReportCard, is theonly nationally representativeandcontinuingassessment that enables thecomparisionof performance in Ohio and other states in varioussubjectareas. Schoolsand studentswithineachstate are selectedrandomlytobea part of theassessment. Not all students inthe state or ina particular school take the assessment.Dataare reported atthe state level only,and there are noindividualstudent orevenschoolsummaryresults. Theassessmentsare conductedinmathematics, reading,science,writing, thearts, civics, economics, geography andU.S. history.

To view Ohios most recentNAEP results,

go to:

and search for key word NAEPhttp://education.ohio.gov

Freedom Elementary School 1 Heritage Elementary School 1

Lakota West High School 2



7/7

1. If a district meets AYP in the current year, it can berated no lower than Continuous Improvement.

2. If a district does not meet AYP for three consecutive years and in the current year it does not meet AYP inmore than one student group, it can be rated no

higher than Continuous Improvement.3. In all other cases, AYP has no effect on the

preliminary designation.Thus, thepreliminary designationbecomes the final designation.

Once the preliminary designation is determined, Value-Added the fourth measure in the accountability system, is evaluated to determine the impact (if any) on the districts finaldesignation.

1. If your districts rating is restricted to ContinuousImprovement due to AYP, then Value-Added will have noimpact on the designation and the preliminary designationbecomes the final designation.

2. If your district experiences above expected growth for atleast two consecutive years, your districts finaldesignation will increase by one designation.

3. If your district experiences below expected growth for atleast three consecutive years, your districts finaldesignation will decrease by one designation.

The preliminary designation results from identifying thehigher value between the percentage of indicators met by your district and your districts performance index. AYP then is evaluated to determine its effect on the preliminarydesignation. There are three ways in which AYP can affect the preliminary designation.

Determining Your District's Rating

Indicators Met Performance Index Score AYP Status Preliminary Designation94%-100% 100 to 120or

or

or

or

or

and

and

and

and

and

andand

Met or Not Met Excellent

75%-93.9%

0%-74.9%

50%-74.9%

31%-49.9 %

0%-30.9%

90 to 99.9

80 to 89.9

0 to 89.9

70 to 79.9

0 to 69.9

Met or Not Met

Not Met

Not Met

Not Met

Met

Effective

Academic Watch

Academic Emergency

ContinuousImprovement

=

=

=

=

=

=

Preliminary Designation Value-Added Measure* Final Designation

Excellent

Effective

Continuous Improvement

Academic Watch

Academic Emergency

Above expected growth for at least 2 consecutive yearsand

and

and

and

and

Excellent with Distinction

Effective

Above expected growth for at least 2 consecutive years

Above expected growth for at least 2 consecutive yearsBelow expected growth for at least 3 consecutive years


Below expected growth for at least 3 consecutive years





Excellent


Academic Emergency

Academic Watch

Academic Emergency


Academic Watch

Effective

*In all other cases, including if your districts designation has been restricted to Continuous Improvement, then Value-Added will hno impact on the designation and the preliminary designation becomes the final designation.

or

or

or

or

or

Determiningyourdistricts reportcard designationis a multi-stepprocess. Thefirst stepis todeterminea preliminary designation,whichisbasedonthe following components:1) thepercentageof indicators met,2) the performanceindexand 3)AYPdetermination


Lakota School District 2009 - 2010 Report Card

Documents

Transcript of Lakota School District 2009 - 2010 Report Card