Laboratory Studies and the Small Bodies Assessment Group

30
Laboratory Studies and the Small Bodies Assessment Group 4 th SBAG Meeting, Washington, DC – Jan. 26, 2011 Reggie Hudson Astrochemistry and Planetary Systems Laboratories NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland

Transcript of Laboratory Studies and the Small Bodies Assessment Group

Page 1: Laboratory Studies and the Small Bodies Assessment Group

Laboratory Studies and the Small Bodies Assessment Group

4th SBAG Meeting, Washington, DC – Jan. 26, 2011

Reggie Hudson

Astrochemistry and Planetary Systems Laboratories NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland

Page 2: Laboratory Studies and the Small Bodies Assessment Group

Marla Moore NASA Goddard

Space Flight Center

Julie Castillo-Rogez

JPL-Caltech, Pasadena, CA

Page 3: Laboratory Studies and the Small Bodies Assessment Group

A brief document

Approach for Version 1.0

Evolution

Harold Urey (1893 – 1981)

Page 4: Laboratory Studies and the Small Bodies Assessment Group

Experience – literature

Recent meetings – SBAG, DPS, LAW, etc.

Colleagues’ conversations

Recent white papers

Survey of workers

Sources of Input for Version 1.0

Page 5: Laboratory Studies and the Small Bodies Assessment Group

Introduction

General issues – state of the art

Properties and processes

Spectroscopy and chemistry

New techniques, goals, subjects

Sample-return issues (see others)

Infrastructure – support

Outline for Version 1.0

Page 6: Laboratory Studies and the Small Bodies Assessment Group

Introduction

Outline

Provide data, simulations, numbers for computational models, and answers to fundamental questions

Make predictions “Calibrate” lab work

Help guide ground- and space-based campaigns

Help define science goals, mission goals

Assist with flight-instrument tests

Storage and analyses of returned samples

$$$

Page 7: Laboratory Studies and the Small Bodies Assessment Group

An Example - Comets

Dina Prialnik et al. (2004) in Comets II

Page 8: Laboratory Studies and the Small Bodies Assessment Group

Introduction

General issues – state of the art

Earth-sciences data

Earth-sciences database

Spectroscopy, chemistry, and the ISM

Chemical kinetics

UHV conditions

Outline

Page 9: Laboratory Studies and the Small Bodies Assessment Group

Introduction

General issues – state of the art

Properties and processes

Ices, minerals, mixtures Examples – density, thermal conductance,

electro-magnetic, wetting, sticking, tensile strength

Brines & slurries – viscosities, geochemical kinetics

Phase diagrams – mixtures – P & T

Outline

Page 10: Laboratory Studies and the Small Bodies Assessment Group

~ 1 cm × 10−4 cm 10+5 cm (1 mile)

Extrapolations

Page 11: Laboratory Studies and the Small Bodies Assessment Group

Introduction

General issues – state of the art

Properties and processes

Rates - kinetics

Isotopic changes?

Enclathration rates and efficiencies

Fracture physics

Diffusion of ice through rocks, minerals

Outline

Page 12: Laboratory Studies and the Small Bodies Assessment Group

Convection

Low-Gravity Studies

Differentiation

Reactions

Lab results SYNERGY Theory

Page 13: Laboratory Studies and the Small Bodies Assessment Group

Introduction

General issues – state of the art

Properties and processes

Spectroscopy and chemistry

Outline

Page 14: Laboratory Studies and the Small Bodies Assessment Group

Solids – spectra, optical constants

Some Lab Spectroscopy Needs

Rocks, minerals, mixtures, and clathrates

Non-H2O Ices

CH4, N2, …

Page 15: Laboratory Studies and the Small Bodies Assessment Group

Introduction

General issues – state of the art

Properties and processes

Spectroscopy and chemistry

Outline

Page 16: Laboratory Studies and the Small Bodies Assessment Group

Solids – Reaction chemistry – Ices

Some Lab Chemistry Needs

Rocks, minerals, mixtures, and clathrates

Thermal Radiolytic Photolytic

Simple & complex molecules

Page 17: Laboratory Studies and the Small Bodies Assessment Group

Equipment Intensive

Page 18: Laboratory Studies and the Small Bodies Assessment Group

Space-Weathered Materials

Solar Wind

Mag >> Cosmic Mag << Cosmic

Galactic Cosmic

Rays

Pluto

Comets

UHV

Page 19: Laboratory Studies and the Small Bodies Assessment Group

Asteroid Itokawa

Water Ice on Asteroid Exogenous or Endogenous?

24 Themis

Rivkin & Emery (2010)

Lab measurements of well-characterized analogs can aid in compositional studies.

Page 20: Laboratory Studies and the Small Bodies Assessment Group

Some Lab Spectroscopy Needs - Gases

Gases – absolute intensities, line assignments

Want ability to model spectra at various T’s

IR spectra of ions

Isotopic ratios – ice vs. gas

Ortho-para issues

Page 21: Laboratory Studies and the Small Bodies Assessment Group

Introduction

General issues – state of the art

Properties and processes

Spectroscopy and chemistry

New techniques, goals, subjects

Outline

Page 22: Laboratory Studies and the Small Bodies Assessment Group

Large-scale methods (> 10 cm)

Sampling technology (e.g., fluffies)

New spectral methods – remote

New spectral methods – in situ

New Techniques, Goals, Subjects

Astrobiology – biotic vs. abiotic Avoid false positives

How are “ee” values altered?

Page 23: Laboratory Studies and the Small Bodies Assessment Group

Introduction

General issues – state of the art

Properties and processes

Spectroscopy and chemistry

New techniques, goals, subjects

Sample-return – see others

Outline

Page 24: Laboratory Studies and the Small Bodies Assessment Group

Introduction

General issues – state of the art

Properties and processes

Spectroscopy and chemistry

New techniques, goals, subjects

Sample-return – see others

More issues – infrastructure – support

Outline

Page 25: Laboratory Studies and the Small Bodies Assessment Group

Infrastructure and Support

Large-scale facilities rare

User facilities are rare

Lack of coordination among lab workers

Electronic databases Ex / Radar measurements, dielectic constants

NAS-NRC 2010 report on NASA laboratories

Succession and continuity

Page 26: Laboratory Studies and the Small Bodies Assessment Group

R A+ $$ D

Photochemical Lifetimes & Gas-Phase Kinetics

R

Come Hale-Bopp ca. 1996

Example – Continuity

Page 27: Laboratory Studies and the Small Bodies Assessment Group

Looking Ahead

Additional community input

AAS lab group (WGLA)

Meeting sessions (DPS, etc.) Your questions and comments

Version 2.0 – August 2011 SBAG Meeting

Page 28: Laboratory Studies and the Small Bodies Assessment Group

Introduction

General issues – state of the art

Properties and processes

Spectroscopy and chemistry

New techniques, goals, subjects

Sample-return – see others

More issues – infrastructure – support

Outline

Page 29: Laboratory Studies and the Small Bodies Assessment Group

The End

Page 30: Laboratory Studies and the Small Bodies Assessment Group