lABOR RELATIONS ll!iiiii ~UNITED POSTIJL SERVICE

lABOR RELATIONS

~UNITED STIJTES ll!iiiii POSTIJL SERVICE

April 1, 2013

Mr. Cliff Guffey President American Postal Workers

Union (APWU), AFL-CIO 1300 L Street, NW Washington, DC 20005-4128

Dear Cliff:

Certified Mail Tracking Number: 7012 2920 0000 8277 3215

As information, enclosed is a copy of the second and final Post Implementation Review for the Portsmouth, New Hampshire Processing & Distribution Facility (P&DF) Area Mail Processing (AMP).

In accordance with the Non-Disclosure Agreement dated February 11, 2013, the Postal Service is providing both redacted and unredacted copies of the PIR.

If you have any questions, please contact Rickey Dean at extension 7412.

Sincerely,

Patrick M. Devine Manager Contract Administration (APWU)

Enclosure

4 7 5 l: ENFANT PLAZA SW

WASHINGTON DC 20260-4101

WWW.USPS.COM (CA2013-340)

',I,

VVi! 1 ,-\tv~:'

:~: 11.\'t

iiii.!'!!!fl Ut'IJ!TED~T4T£S ~ POSTIJ.L SERVICE

March 22, 2013

RICHARD P. ULUSKI

SUBJECT: Final Post-Implementation Review (PIR)- Portsmouth, New Hampshire Processing and Distribution Facility (P&DF) -Area Mail Processing (AMP)

The AMP proposal for the transfer of destinating operations from Portsmouth NH P&DF into the Manchester NH Processing and Distribution Center (P&DC) and the Southern Maine P&DC was approved on August 5, 2011, with implementation completed by January 1, 2012. The final PIR shows a first year savings of $8,61 0,203, which exceeded the financial expectation of the first year savings of $6,599,188 for the AMP.

I extend my appreciation to the Northern New England District and the Northeast Area for successfully completing the implementation of the Portsmouth NH Destinating AMP. Please ensure that all supporting documentation is maintained at the Area Office for three years from the date of this memorandum.

If you have any questions or concerns, please contact Jack Larrimore, Manager, Area Mail Processing & Facility Consolidation at (202} 268-3160.

f

o~~~~- 0uuams

-- Summarized PIR Header Page --

Type of Distribution to Consolidate:: Destinating Facility Name & Type:, Portsmouth P&DF

Street Address:! 345 Heritage Ave City: I Portsmouth

State:i NH 50 Facility ZIP Code: i 03801

District: • Northern New England Area:! Northeast

Finance Number: I 32-6920 Current 3D ZIP Code(s): i 038, 039

Miles to Gaining Facility:; 41 miles to Manchester, 53 miles to Southern Maine EXFC office: • Mike Walsh

Plant Manager:! N/A Senior Plant Manager:! Michael Labrie

District Manager: I Deborah Essler

Facility Name & Type:! Manchester P&DC Street Address: 1 955 Goffs Falls Rd

City:j Manchester State:' NH

50 Facility ZIP Code:! 03103 District:! Northern New England

Area: I Northeast Finance Number: i 32-4801

Current 3D ZIP Code(s): i 030-034 EXFC office: • Yes

Plant Manager:! N/A Senior Plant Manager:! Michael Labrie

District Manager: I Deborah Essler

Approval Date:! August 5, 2011 Implementation Date:1 January 1, 2012

PIR Type: Final PIR

I Southern Maine P&DC 79 Postal Service Way

I Scarborough

I ME $

I 04074 Northern New England Northeast

i 22-6901 039-043, 045, 048

I Yes James Lentz Michael Labrie

?§

I Deborah Essler

Date Range of Data:; January 1, 2012 ' December 31, 2012 Date this workbook was last saved: I 211/2013

Area Vice President:! Richard P. Uluski Vice President, Network Operations: I David E. Williams

Area AMP Coordinator: i Stu Teger NAI contact: ; Barbara Brewington

PIR Data Entry Page

Approval Signatures

PIR Type: F!n81 PJ8 lmplllmentatlon Dele: 01101/12

Dele....,.. of Dllla: ..l!ln-01-2012 - Dec>31-i912

lilA

2

Losing Facility Name and Type: Street Address:

City:

State:

Current SCF ZIP Code(s):

Type of Distribution Consolidated:

Gaining Facility Name and Type: Street Address:

City:

State:

Current SCF ZIP Code(s):

Savings/Costs

Staffing

Function 1 Workhour Savings

Non-Processing Craft Workhour Savings (less Maint!Trans)

PCES/EAS Workhour Savings

Transportation Savings

Maintenance Savings

Space Savings

Total Annual Savings

Total One-Time Costs

Total First Year Savings

Craft Position Loss

Executive Summary PIR Type: Final PIR Last Saved: February 1, 2013 Date Range of Data: 1/1/10-6/30/10

Portsmouth P&DF 345 Heritage Ave Portsmouth NH

038,039

Destinating

PIR vs Pre AMP PIR vs Approved

$4,674,033 $1,537,692 from Workhour Costs - Combined

$176,064 ($2,353) from Other Curr vs Prop

$922,880 ($227,394) from Other Curr vs Prop

$112,761 $585,280 from Transpottation HCR and Transpottation PVS

$2,765,657 $111,102 from Maintenance

$0 $0 from Space Evaluation and Other Costs

$8,651,396 $2,004,327

($41,193) $6,687 from Space Evaluation and Other Costs

$8,610,203 $2,011,014

116 47 from Staffing-Craft

15 8 from Staffing-PCESIEAS PCES/EAS Position Loss

::FIJ!\ilii~!ll!ll1:'!1:!"'1%'1~116~;@;m00 •••• 1~-~--~D~,~~::I1~.j;,~~-m .. ~------~~-WmF~-~w:~.G~~.ii!G~~-~·.;W:;·~~}'etJ>i!Jilit-·<iA-111 Ji L u•JJJGJJ

Service

First-Class Mail Service Performance (EXFC 0/N)

First-Class Mail Service Performance (EXFC 2 Day)

First-Class Mail Service Performance (EXFC 3 Day)

Customer Experience Measurement Overall Satisfaction - Residential at PFC level

Customer Experience Measurement Overall Satisfaction - Small Business at PFC level

3

Latest Quarter

Portsmouth P&DF Manchester P&DC Southern Maine P&DC

93.64% 95.73% 96.33%

90.59% 92.49% 93.85%

90.26% 89.43% 89.95%

93.0%

88.4%

PIR Executive Summary

Calculation Befe[eoctus Combined Losing and Gaining Facility Data: PreAMP Proposed PIR

Function 1 Workhour Costs $57,271,004 $54,134,663 $52,596,972 Non-Processing Craft Workhour Costs

$2,022,183 $1,843,766 $1,846,119 (less Maintenance & Transportation)

PCES/EAS Workhour Costs $8,300,360 $7,150,085 $7,377,479 Transportation Costs $7,750,110 $8,222,630 $7,637,349

Maintenance Costs $23,334,566 $20,680,011 $20,568,908 Space Savings $0 $0 $0

Total Annual Costs $98,678,223 $92,0311155 $90,026,827

Total One-Time Costs $0 $47,880 $411193

Total First Year Costs $98,678,223 $92,079,035 $90,068,020

Staffina

Craft Position Total On-Rolls 1,035 966 919 PCES/EAS Position Total On-Rolls 89 82 74

Approved AMP

Function 1 Workhour Savings $4,674,033 $1,537,692 $3,136,341 Non-Processing Craft Wor1<hour Savings $176,064 ($2,353) $178,418 (less MainVTrans}

PCES/EAS Workhour Savings $922,880 ($227,394) $1,150,274 Transportation Savings $112,761 $585,280 ($472,520)

Maintenance Savings $2,765,657 $1111102 $2,654,555 Space Savings $0 $0 $0

Total Annual Savings $8,651,396 $2,004,327 $6,647,068

Total One-Time Costs ($41 1 193) $6,687 ($47,880)

Total First Year Savings $8,610,203 $2,011,014 $6,599,188

Staffing Craft Position Loss 116 47 69

PCES/EAS Position Loss 15 8 7

PIR Executive Summary 4

5

Summary Narrative Last Saved: February 1, 2013

Losing Facility Name and Type: Portsmouth P&DF Current SCF ZIP Code(s): 038, 039

Type of Distribution Consolidated: Destinating

Gaining Facility Name and Type: Manchester P&DC and Current SCF ZIP Code(s): 030-034

Southern Maine P&DC 039-043, 045, 048

The Northern New England (NNE) District has successfully completed the destinating Portsmouth P&DF Area Mail Processing (AMP) plan. This plan transferred destinating SCF 038 mail processing operations and mail volume to the Manchester P&DC (NH) and destinating/originating SCF 039 mail processing operations and mail volume into the Southern Maine P&DC in Scarborough, Maine. The Portsmouth P&DF originating AMP (038-039) was finalized on October 1, 2009 into the Manchester P&DC. With this current destinating AMP, SCF 039 originating operations migrated to the Southern Maine P&DC along with destinating operations concurrently.

BACKGROUND

The Portsmouth P&DF is a postal owned facility that has been vacated of all Function 1 mail processing operations. Remaining at this facility are the Portsmouth City/Greenland delivery operations, Business Mail Entry Unit (BMEU), HQ/NEA Administrative field offices, training rooms, and building maintenance services.

The destinating Portsmouth P&DF AMP was conducted in three (3) phases;

Phase 1 redirected both originating and destination operations from eleven (11) 5 digit 039 zones into the Southern Maine P&DC on October 1, 2011. One (1) Delivery Bar Code Sorter (DBCS) machine from the Portsmouth P&DF was relocated along with the mail volume for SCF 039; this DBCS machine has been subsequently moved into the Manchester P&DC. On 8/1/11, a DIOSS machine was moved into the Manchester P&DC for processing STD "A" volumes from Portsmouth P&DF as part of the official AMP movement of mails.

Phase 2 coordinated the movement of two (2) DBCS machines along with a portion of the seventy eight (78) 5 digit SCF 038 zones for DPS and CR processing into the Manchester P&DC on November 12, 2011.

Phase 3 entailed the relocation of two (2) additional DBCS machines into the Manchester P&DC for handling the remainder of the SCF 038 zones into both DPS and CR processing and was finalized on November 19, 2011.

All Function 1 mail processing operations ceased in the Portsmouth P&DF after Dispatch of Value (DOV) on Saturday, November 19, 2011.

FINANCIAL SUMMARY

Financial savings from the consolidation of destinating operations were achieved via mail processing workhour savings and Transportation savings. First year savings are partially offset by one-time costs to relocate mail processing equipment from the Portsmouth P&DF to both the Southern Maine P&DC and the Manchester P&DC.

Total First Year Savings: AMP proposed savings $6,599,188 PIR vs. Pre AMP $8,610,203 Difference to proposed $2,011,014

Significant Function 1 work hour savings can be attributed to tour compression, increased BPI/productivity and overtime control in the gaining facilities.

PIR Summary Narrative

6

STAFFING IMPACTS

The AMP projected a reduction of 69 craft positions. Actual PIR craft reductions were 116 positions, a savings of an additional47 craft employees.

The AMP projected a reduction of 7 EAS positions. Actual PI R EAS reductions were 15 positions, a savings of an additional 8 EAS employees.

CUSTOMER & SERVICE IMPACTS

SCF 039 was upgraded from within the Southern Maine P&DC (AADC 040-043, 045, 048) in overnight First-Class Mail (FCM) service standards and downgraded to 2-day service from the Manchester P&DC (AADC 030-034) and Middlesex-Essex P&DC (AADC 018-019). It should be noted that SCF 039 is located within the state of Maine and was originally processed out of the Portland Maine facility prior to the opening of the Portsmouth P&DF in New Hampshire.

Service improvement across all performance categories as noted below in overnight, 2-day and 3-day measurements for both absorbing facilities:


7

EXFC 0/D

EXFC 0/D

EXFC 0/D

The Customer Experience Measurement (CEM) Overall Residential at PFC level is 92.70% for Q3 FY12. The CEM for Small Business at PFC level in Q3 FY12 is at 87.40%.

RETAIL AND BUSINESS MAIL ENTRY UNIT (BMEU) IMPACTS

The Portsmouth P&DF contained no retail operations and the BMEU operations were not affected. All mail processing operations have been removed from Portsmouth. Carrier and other customer service operations remain.


TRANSPORTATION CHANGES

Total First Year Cost: AMP proposed cost PIR vs. Pre AMP Difference to proposed

($472,520) $112,761 $585,280

The Transportation savings were based on the consolidation and rearrangement of Associate Office (AO) runs and the elimination of facility interchange trips (Portsmouth to Manchester and Manchester to Portsmouth). Other Transportation changes that are updated are due to renegotiation and increased fuel costs.

EQUIPMENT RELOCATION

A total of five (5) Delivery Bar Code Sorters and one (1) DIOSS machine were relocated as a result of this AMP.

Proposed relocation costs Actual relocation costs

($47,880) ($41,193)

A relocation savings of $6,687 were realized from the original AMP proposal due to the use of internal resources.

MAINTENANCE IMPACTS

The Maintenance slight overrun to the original AMP proposal is due to the filling of vacancies that were originally withheld.

Total First Year Savings: AMP proposed savings $2,654,555 PIR vs. Pre AMP $2,765,657 Difference to proposed $ 111,1 02

SUMMARY

The AMP feasibility study to move destinating operations into the Manchester P&DC and Southern Maine P&DC indicated a potential First-Year Savings of $6,599,188. The Post Implementation Review (PIR}, after finalization of the AMP process, indicates a First-Year Savings of $8,610,203. Overall results reflect a greater than expected potential savings than originally planned by a total of $2,011,014, with improvements to make service for overnight, 2-day and 3-day for all related service areas.


8

9

Service Performance and Customer Satisfaction Measurement Last Saved: February 1, 2013

PIRType: Final PIR Implementation Date: 01/01/12

EXFC 0/D I I I

EXFC 0/D

EXFC 0/D

1 Overall Satisfaction (Overall Experience)

Satisfaction with Receiving (Experience with receiving)

Satisfaction with Sending (Experience with sending)

Satisfaction with most frequently visited PO (Experience with most frequently visitec

Satisfaction with most recent contact with USPS {Experience with most recent conta

Ukely to recommend the USPS

PIR Service Performance and Customer Satisfaction Measurement

I otilerworkhour Move Analysis I Losing Facilrty: Portsmouth P&DF Gaining Facility: Manchester P&DC Date Range of Data 01/01/12 to 12131/12

10

PIR Workhour Costs - Combined Facilities

.. &, ' 0 '" • T

~ ~ ~ ~

Totals 1 22,865

11

PIR Workhour Costs- Combined Facilities

•••• -~ ~ Totals 1 s33

I Distribution to Other AMP Worksheet Tabs I

1- ~··:1 -=r -· -.. :1 I ~7·:4 - ~7·:1 $71.·:1 Maintenance - Losing Maintenance - Gaining

12


Supervisor Summary - Losing Supervisory - Gaining

summary l>y Group PreAMP ombined Proposed - Combined PIR -Combined Special Adiustments PIR to Prooosed- Change PIR to Pre-AMP- Ch~e ............ -~ """""""' """" ........... """"" """""""' -.. WKtnChange IPen:entChangEi ~Change PercertChar~ge WKinChonge Percent Change """"""'""' PercentCNinge

"Other Craft" Ops(less Ops going to 'Trans-PVS' 'Maintenance' Tabs 42,246 $1,912,41 36,606 $1,750,83 35,809 $1,662,057 $C -3,077 -791 -$88,7801 -5.07> -6,437 -15.2 .. -$250,358 -13.09%

Transportation Ops(goingto Trans-PVStab 26,552 $1,150,8 2-4,809 $1,082,14 30,368 S1,155,n4 5,559 22.41 $73,576' 6.80'.< 3,816 14.37 $4,894 0.43' Maintenance Ops (going to Maintenance tab 460,150 $20,236,87 •04.262 $17,789,76! 399,908 $18,091,232 -4,354 -1 OS> $301,467 169'.< ..00,241 -13.09'> -$2,145,641 -10.60'

SuDerVisorY 0 159,118 $8,300,36! 136,253 $7,150,08! 133,823 $7,377,.7S ~ -2,430 -1.7"' $227,394' 3.18 -25,295 -15.,.,., -$922,680 -11.120A Supervisor/Craft Joing Op •• 049 $109,76! 3,576 $92,92! 7,5C $184,062 3,971 111.03' $91,1331 9807> 3,499 86.42 $74,294 67.61r%

T~ 692,114 $31,710,24 607,787 $27,865,76! 607,455 $26,470,55· $C -332 -0.05 $604,7891 2.17> ..84,659 -1~ -$3,239,692 -10.22% -33 -0.05 804,78 2.17 --84,65 -1223 -3,239,6 -10.22'1<

consolidated with second gaining site

13


I other Workhour Move Analysis I to 12131/12

14


15


[ --Distribution to Other AMP \1\/orkSheet Tabs I

Ops 617, 679, 764(31)

Ops765, 700 (34)

l---1 I I I I I J Maintenance - Losing

16

Ops 765,766 (34)

Maintenance -Gaining


Supervisor Summary - Losing

PreAMP -"'Other Craft"' Ops(less Cps going to irans-PVS 'Maintenance' Tabs 22,410

Transportation Ops(going to Trans-PVS tab 23,173

Maintenance Ops (going to Maintenance tab 246,979

Supenriso<yO n.a1o Supervisor/Craft Johlg 0 2,830

Tota 368,201

Total Ad. 0 $0

17

:;ombined

-~

$1,011,921

$1,014,761

$10,550,581

$3,768,46e

$68,500 $16,414,29C

Pr sed - Combined .......... 22,410

23,173

248,484

n.a1o 2,830

369,706

Operation Number

"""~

$1,011,921

$1,014,76

$10,619.25

$3,768,46

$88,58 $16,482,961

PIR - Combined

'"""""""' -~ 20,179 $942,71

28,735 $1,064,27

233,443 $10,488,80<

70,122 $3,765,87

5,195 $119,62 357,674 $16,401.~

Supervisory - Gaining Annual Workhours

summary by Group

Special Ad'ustments PIR to Proposed - Change PIR to Pre-AMP- Change - """'" Wl<tnet.nge PercertCt.ng """"Cho""' Pe~Change -~0..,. Peroent CNrnge """'"0..,. -""'""' $() -2,231 -9.95~ -$69,209 -6.84% -2,231 -9.95 ...$69,209 -6.84-A $() 5,5fl2 24.00'! $69,509 6.85 5,5fl2 24.00 $69,509 6.85-A $() -15,041 -6.05 ..$130,454 -1.2:3% -13,536 -5.48'A -$61,775 -059% $() -2,688 -369'> .-$2,591 -0.07 -2.688 -3.68'A -$2,591 -O.OJO.A $() 2,365 83.69'> $51,065 74.48% 2,365 83.59'A $51,065 74.46'* $() -12,033 -3.25 -$81,680 -050% -10,527 -286'A -$13,001 -0.08%

-12,03 -325 -81,68 -050 -10,521 -2 -13,001 -0.08"A


Losing Facility: Portsmouth P&DF

Type of Distribution Consolidated: Destinating

Workhour Costs - Losing Facility last Saved: February 1, 2013

~ !!Jili!l1,.,unction 4

11 41

12 42

,. " ,. .. 10 ..

" .. 17 47 ..

PIR Type•: -i;~i::i:,;:•c;';~:-i~i;i~R>:co:::lo:::,..,=,c::;,-::an::n:.c,_:::,~::od:<ti::O<:<F=o"' PIR.

Date Range of Data: Jan-01-2012 to Oee-31-2012

PIR Workhour Costs- Losing

PIR Workhour Costs· Losing

I Percent I -100.0"A> I IOIV/0! ~~----;;;rcent I -100.0% I IOIV/0! II Percent I -100.0% I IRJowu• II r••=n 1 ··~-~· 1 ... ---· II . -·----- I I (27) NOTES:

=============================================================================-~--~b·;~

20 PIR Workhour Costs - Losing

Gaining Facility: Manchester P&DC

Type of Distribution Consolidated: Oestinating

Workhour Costs - Gaining Facility last Saved. February 1, 2013

PIR Type*: ""~"i~;;;•:r,li:;-;~i;i~R>Cco:;;l;;-;umn=sT.;;s-:::an;;;n;;;ual"'~;:;e:;;-d ;;;fo<;-;F"-;n;td"PtR.

Date Range of Data: ~ to Dec:-31-2012

PIR Workhour Costs - Gaining

PJR Workhour Costs - Gaining

PIR Workhour Costs- Gaining

I ••·• ~ I I L..:=:::=:.__.L___::.__ _ ____,'--

(27) NOTES: -~J1'iJ!:·.''J%f:~

24 PIR Workhour Costs~ Gaining

Workhour Costs - Gaining Facility

Gaining Facility: Southern Maine P&DC

• .. • • .. • . • I PIR Type•: .;,;D,;;;i:,i';;a';;l,~;i~i;i~R,-;coiu=mns=;;;is-;;;an;;;o;;;u~""•"'ed«!o<=F;;:;;;,.., PIR Function 1 Function 4

11 $40.07 41 12 $47.00 --

Type of Distribution Consolidated: Destinating 1l $44..45 Date Range of Data: Jan-01-2012 to Dec-31-2012 14 $35.75 16 $25.73 ,.

PIR Worthour Costs- Gaining

PIR Workhour Costs. Gaining

-.._ .... ,v

(27) NOTES: :;'J@j,:I~H ,'gj;t~l~f',"Hn,:,~

28 PIR Workhour Costs- Gaining

Staffing - Craft PIRType: Final PIR

Data Extraction Date: 1/9/13 --------

Craft Positions

Gaining Facility: Manchester P&DC Finance#: 32-4801

Finance#:

Craft Positions

, . ._ . ._ . ._ . ._ . ._._, . ._ . ._ . ._ . ._ . ._._, I I I

j PIR vs Pre AMP j PIR vs Proposed j

Total Craft Position Loss:! 116 ! 47 ! .............. __ .~ ................ ~ (Above numbers are carried forward to the Executive Summary)

29 PIR Staffing -Craft

Staffing - PCES/EAS

Data Extraction Date: 1/9/2013 PIR Type: Final PIR

Losing Facility: Portsmouth P&DF Finance# ..:::3.::.2-..:::6:..:92:..:0:..._ ____ _

PCES/EAS Positions On-Rolls

EAS Staff currently on rolls detailed to other offices.

30

PIR Staffing- PCES/EAS

Gaining Facility: Manchester P&DC Finance # 32-4801

PCES/EAS Positions

31

PIR Staffing - PCES/EAS

Gaining Facility: Southern Maine P&DC Finance# 22-6901

PCES/EAS Positions

~--.--.-.-----------------------~---------------------~--------------------------~ ' ' (37) ' (38) ' 1 Total PCES/EAS Position~ PIR vs Pre AMP 1 PIR vs Proposed 1

I Lossl 15 I 8 I I I I I

L-------------------------------_._·------------------~--------------------------~ (Above numbers are carried forward to the Executive Summary)

32

PIR Staffing- PCES/EAS


Type of Distribution Consolidated: Destinating Data of HCR Data File:

Route#

33

Transportation - HCR

PIR vs Pre AMP Change Analysis

PIRvs Proposed

PIR Type: Final PIR

PIR

PIR Transportation HCR - Losing

Transportation - HCR

Gaining Facility: Manchester P&DC and Southern Maine P&DC

Date of HCR Data File: 01/01/13 CET for Inbound Dock:

CET for Cancellations:

Route#

34

PIR Type: Destinating

CETforOGP: ------CT for Outbound Dock:

PIR

PIR Transportation HCR - Gaining

Totals 993,315 891,837

35

$2.36 $0.00

Summary HCR Losing & Gaining

Change Analysis Pre PIRvs Pre PIRvs

Losing

Gaining

Total PIR vs Pre AMP Transportation-HeR Savings: ($117,655) (from losing and gaining facilities)

Total PIR vs Proposed Transportation-HeR Savings: ($658,856) (from losing and gaining facilities)

Total Transportation

PIRvs Pre AMP

HCR ($117 655) PVS $4,894

Total PIR vs Pre AMP Transportation (PVS & HCR): ($112,761) (This number carried forward to the Executive Summary)

Total PIR vs Proposed Transportation (PVS & HCR): (This number carried forward to the Executive Summary)

PIRvs Proposed

($658 85Sl $73,576

($585,280)

PIR Transportation HCR -Gaining

Date Range of Data: Jan-01-2012 --to-- Dec-31-2012

Facility: Portsmouth P&DF Finance Number: 32-6920

····- (2) I (3)

Proposed I PIR

Variances Total Annual Costs

Change Analysis

Dollars

(11) Total PIR vs Pre AMP PVS Savings: (This number added to the HCR worksht)

36

PIRvs PIRvs PreAMP Proposed

J$68,68_'1_} $0

$4,894

I I

Transportation - PVS

PIRType: Final PIR

Manchester P&DC Southern Maine P&DC 32-4801 22-6901

I (8)

I •P.:odl (11)

PIR PIR

Variances Total Annual Costs Variances Total Annual Costs

PIRvs PIRvs PIRvs Change Analysis PreAMP Proposed

Change PIRvs Analysis PreAMP Proposed I

Dollars $4067 _______H.067_ Dollars

(11) Total PIR vs Proposed PVS Savings: (This number added to the HCR worksht)

$6!MQ9 $69,509

$73,576

PIR Transportation - PVS

J

MPE Inventory Last Saved: February 1, 2013

Data Extraction Date: 1/26/2013 -==..:..::.... ___ _ PIR Type: Final PIR

Facility: Portsmouth P&DF Manchester P&DC Southern Maine P&DC

PIR Equipment

Proposed PIR Variance in

Relocation Relocation Costs Costs Costs

$0 $0

$0 $0

$0 $0

$0 $0

$0 $0

$39,900 $34,219 ($5,681)

$0 $0

$7,980 $6,974 ($1,006)

$0 $0

$0 $0

$0 $0

$0 so I $0 $0

$0 $0

$0 $0

$0 $0

$0 $0

$0 $0

$0 $0

$0 $0

$0

$0

$0

~~

$47,880 $41193 ($6 687 --:,.. ...:; ;:>..

Notes: Carriedto J

Space Evaluation and Other Costs

37 PIR MPE Inventory

LDC 36

I LDC 37

LDC 38

LDC39

I LDC 93

Maintenance

Date Range of Data: Jan-01-2012 --to- Dec-31-2012

Facility: Portsmouth P&DF Finance Number: ..:3.;;;2...;-6;..;9.;;;2;;;.0 __ _

Work hour Activity

Mail Processing Equipment $

Building Equipment $

Building Services $ (Custodial Cleaning)

Maintenance Operations $ Support

Maintenance

Wotkhour Cost Subtotal

Maintenance Parts, Supplies & $ Facility Utilities

Grand Total $

Ol

9,2091

8,201 I

Ol

Ol

17,409 I

Variances Total Annual Costs

Change Analysis PIRvs Pre PIRvs AMP Proposed

Dollars _($3 135 873} J.$25 097)

0

0

0

0

0

0

$0

0

PIR vs Pre AMP - Maintenance Savings: PIR vs Proposed - Maintenance Savings:

38

PIR Type*: Final PIR

Manchester P&DC Southern Maine P&DC 22-6901

Proposed I PIR

4,157,620 I 4,473,280 $ 4,904,861 4,800,617

642,4261 680,598 $ 1,320,101 1,400,707

$ 1,926,030 I 1,945,372 3,467,872 3,408,779

426,4761 460,747 775,747 721,006

$.Wtlli·- 5681 42,429 150,679 157,696

$-'-I!Pn 7,153,120 I 7,602,426 10,619,259 10,488,806

$ $ $1,242,8661 $1,247,4661 $1,058,415

•• I $

Variances Total Annual Costs Variances Total Annual Costs

Change Analysis PIRvs Pre PIRvs Change Analysis PIRvs Pre PIRvs AMP Proposed AMP Proposed

Dollars $616 441 $233 499 Dollars ($246,226) J..$319 505)

$2.765,657 $111,102

(These numbers carried forward to the Executive Summary) (These numbers carried forward to the Executive Summary)

PIR Transportation- PVS

(1)

Distribution Changes Last Saved: February 1, 2013

Losing Facility : Portsmouth P&DF PIR Type: Final PIR

Type of Distribution Consolidated: Destinating Date Range of Data: Jan-01-2012 --to-- Dec-31-2012

Place a "X" next to the DMM labeling list(s) revised as result of the approved AMP.

DMM L001 DMM L011

Identify the date of the Postal Bulletin that contained DMM labeling list revisions.

(2) Postal Bulletin 1 0-6-11 (PB 22321)

X DMM L002

X DMM L003

X DMM L004

X DMM L005

DMM L006

DMM L007

DMM L008

DMM L009

L_~ DMM L010

-

DMM L201

DMM L601

DMM L602

DMM L603

DMM L604

DMM L605

DMM L606

DMM L607

X DMM L801

Was the Service Standard Directory updated for the approved AMP?

(3) Yes

(4) Drop Shipments for Destination Entry Discounts

FAST Appointment Summary Report NASS

Facility Name Total No-Show Late Arrival 0 en

Month Losing I Gaining Facility Code Schd Count % Count % Count %

Nov '12 Losing Facility 038 Portsmouth N/A

Dec '12 Losing Facility 038 Portsmouth N/A

Nov '12 Gaining Facility 030 Manchester N/A

Dec '12 Gaining_ Facility_ 030 Manchester N/A

Nov '12 Gaining Facility 040 Southern Maine 528 168 31.82% 123 23.30% 0 0.00%

Dec '12 Gaining Facility_ 040 Southern ~~ine _ ·~~ ~ 141 33.25% 81 19.1~ 0 0.00% -~ -

(5) Notes: Portsmouth goes to Manchester. Manchester goes to Nashua L&DC.

Count

360

283

Closed %

68.18%

66.75%

39 PIR Distribution Changes

Unschd Count

10

7


5-Digit ZIP Code: .;:0.:::38:,:0:.,.:1~----Data Extraction Date: 01/24/13

1. Collection Points Number picked up before 1 p.m.

Number picked up between 1-5 p.m.

Number picked up after 5 p.m.

Total Number of Coiled ion Points

2. How many collection boxes are currently designated for "local delivery"?

3. How many "local delivery" boxes were removed as a result of AMP?

4. Delivery Perfonnance Report

% Carriers returning before 5 p.m.

Customer Service Issues Last Saved: February 1, 2013

r=o= J

I o I

5. Retail Unit Inside Losing Facility (Window Service Tlmes) 6. Business (Bulk) Mail Acceptance Hours

7. Can customers obtain a local postmark in accordance with applicable policies in the Postal Operations Manual? Yes

8. Notes:

Gaining Facility: Manchester P&DC Gaining Facility: Southern Maine P&DC

9. What postmark is printed on collection mail?

Line 1 Manchester NH 030 Line 1 So. Maine P&DC 040

Line 2 date & time Line 2 date & time

40

. .,~ ... ,~ PIR Customer Service Issues

Space Evaluation and Other Costs Last Saved: February 1, 2013

Losing Facility: Portsmouth P&DF Date: ----=0=2/'-"0.:..:1/-'-13"----

Space Evaluation

1. Affected Facil~y

2. One-Time Costs -Enter any one-time costs: _ _.;$::.::0:.....- $0 $0 (These numbers carried below to One-Time Costs section.)

3. Savings Information

Space Savings ($): _ _..$_0 __ $0 $0 (These numbers carried forward to the Executive Summary)

4. Did you utilize the acquired space as planned? Explain. All mail processing operations have been removed from the Portsmouth building. Carriers and other customer svc operations remain.

5. Notes:

One-Time Costs

Employee Relocation Costs $0 $0 $0

Mail Processing Equipment Relocation Costs $47,880 $41,193 ($6,687)

41

(from MPE Inventory)

Facility Costs $0 $0 $0 (from above)

Total One-Time Costs $47,880 $41,193 ($&,687) PIR costs carried forward to Executive Summary)

Remote Encoding Center Cost per 1000 Losing Facility: .:..P..:o.:..;rt.:..;snno.:..;.:..;u:;.;th:.:....:...P.:..;&;:.D:....F _______ _

Pre AMP- FY 11 Range of Report:

Gaining Facility: Manchester P&DC & Southern Maine P&DC

PIR- FY 12

PIR Space Evaluation and Other Costs

lABOR RELATIONS ll!iiiii ~UNITED POSTIJL SERVICE

Documents

Transcript of lABOR RELATIONS ll!iiiii ~UNITED POSTIJL SERVICE