Labor Law Update: GIRN – October 15, 2014 Stefan Jan Marculewicz, Esq. Littler Mendelson, P.C....

25
Labor Law Update: GIRN – October 15, 2014 Stefan Jan Marculewicz, Esq. Littler Mendelson, P.C. Washington, DC Office 202.423.2415 [email protected] 1

Transcript of Labor Law Update: GIRN – October 15, 2014 Stefan Jan Marculewicz, Esq. Littler Mendelson, P.C....

Page 1: Labor Law Update: GIRN – October 15, 2014 Stefan Jan Marculewicz, Esq. Littler Mendelson, P.C. Washington, DC Office 202.423.2415 smarculewicz@littler.com.

Labor Law Update: GIRN – October 15, 2014

Stefan Jan Marculewicz, Esq.Littler Mendelson, P.C.Washington, DC [email protected]

Page 2: Labor Law Update: GIRN – October 15, 2014 Stefan Jan Marculewicz, Esq. Littler Mendelson, P.C. Washington, DC Office 202.423.2415 smarculewicz@littler.com.

Agenda

The Environment The NLRB Actual and anticipated

changes in the law Innovative and Creative

Approaches

2

Page 3: Labor Law Update: GIRN – October 15, 2014 Stefan Jan Marculewicz, Esq. Littler Mendelson, P.C. Washington, DC Office 202.423.2415 smarculewicz@littler.com.

Environment – Unionization In Decline

Union membership down by 1.9 million since 2000

Union share of electorate down 30% since 2000

Currently 6.7% of private sector

Unions continue to wield significant political power

Seeking creative solutions to solve the problem

Page 4: Labor Law Update: GIRN – October 15, 2014 Stefan Jan Marculewicz, Esq. Littler Mendelson, P.C. Washington, DC Office 202.423.2415 smarculewicz@littler.com.

The Board Personnel– Board Appointments

Mark Gaston Pearce (D)(2018)

Nancy J. Schiffer (D)(2014)

Kent Y. Hirozawa (D)(2016)

Philip A. Miscimarra (R)(2017)

Harry I. Johnson, III (R)(2015)

Sharon Block (to arrive shortly)

The NLRB

4

Page 5: Labor Law Update: GIRN – October 15, 2014 Stefan Jan Marculewicz, Esq. Littler Mendelson, P.C. Washington, DC Office 202.423.2415 smarculewicz@littler.com.

The role of the NLRB General Counsel– Direct policy

– Prosecutorial Discretion

Richard F. Griffin, Jr– Background

– Objectives

The Current General Counsel

5

Page 6: Labor Law Update: GIRN – October 15, 2014 Stefan Jan Marculewicz, Esq. Littler Mendelson, P.C. Washington, DC Office 202.423.2415 smarculewicz@littler.com.

The General Counsel’s Agenda

Arbitration Agreements– Continued prosecution of the claimed right to pursue

class/collective claims

Worker access to property– Off duty access

Enhance strikers rights– Intermittent strike doctrine at risk

Protected concerted activities– Outreach, policy review and critique

Joint Employment Social media 6

Page 7: Labor Law Update: GIRN – October 15, 2014 Stefan Jan Marculewicz, Esq. Littler Mendelson, P.C. Washington, DC Office 202.423.2415 smarculewicz@littler.com.

NLRB Changes in the law

7

Page 8: Labor Law Update: GIRN – October 15, 2014 Stefan Jan Marculewicz, Esq. Littler Mendelson, P.C. Washington, DC Office 202.423.2415 smarculewicz@littler.com.

How the NLRB can change the law

Must have a valid quorum– Noel Canning

– Current state of affairs at the NLRB

Case/Controversy– Where the bulk of the work is done

Rulemaking– Recent defeats

• Poster

• Election rules

– Current efforts 8

Page 9: Labor Law Update: GIRN – October 15, 2014 Stefan Jan Marculewicz, Esq. Littler Mendelson, P.C. Washington, DC Office 202.423.2415 smarculewicz@littler.com.

Rulemaking – Expedited elections

9

On February 6, 2014, the NLRB published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in the Federal Register, again proposing essentially the same changes to election rules.– The new rules are likely to be finalized after the election

but before the end of the year

Elections are currently 42 days. Time would reduce to 20-30– Eliminate means to make challenges

– Provide information (email and phone numbers) they currently do not have the right to obtain

Page 10: Labor Law Update: GIRN – October 15, 2014 Stefan Jan Marculewicz, Esq. Littler Mendelson, P.C. Washington, DC Office 202.423.2415 smarculewicz@littler.com.

Micro Units

Specialty Healthcare and subsequent cases– Any grouping of employees

made by employer can be an appropriate bargaining unit

– Result: Allow unions to gerrymander the bargaining unit around the extent of organizing

– Macy’s and Bergdorf-Goodman cases

10

Page 11: Labor Law Update: GIRN – October 15, 2014 Stefan Jan Marculewicz, Esq. Littler Mendelson, P.C. Washington, DC Office 202.423.2415 smarculewicz@littler.com.

Joint Employment

Change the current test of actual control over certain specific criteria

Joint Employer – Browning Ferris

“[U]nder the totality of the circumstances, including the way the separate entities have structured their commercial relationship, the putative joint employer wields sufficient influence over the working conditions of the other entity’s employees such that meaningful bargaining could not occur in its absence. “ - NLRB General Counsel (amicus filing with NLRB)

11

Page 12: Labor Law Update: GIRN – October 15, 2014 Stefan Jan Marculewicz, Esq. Littler Mendelson, P.C. Washington, DC Office 202.423.2415 smarculewicz@littler.com.

Joint Employment (cont.)

Application– Franchising; Temporary, leased or contingent

employment; and

– Commercial relationships structured so one party is in a position to influence the labor relations policies of the other.

McDonald’s announcement Supply Chain Implications– Commercial relationships

12

Page 13: Labor Law Update: GIRN – October 15, 2014 Stefan Jan Marculewicz, Esq. Littler Mendelson, P.C. Washington, DC Office 202.423.2415 smarculewicz@littler.com.

Access to Property

Non-Employee Access– Roundy’s Inc – Case pending. Board to reconsider scope of

non-employee access to employer property

Employee Access– Sodexo – Established very high standard for employer to

bar off-duty employees from entering premises

Email– Purple Communications – Fears of NLRB overreach not

realized. Employer continues for now to retain control over email communications

13

Page 14: Labor Law Update: GIRN – October 15, 2014 Stefan Jan Marculewicz, Esq. Littler Mendelson, P.C. Washington, DC Office 202.423.2415 smarculewicz@littler.com.

Policy Review – The StandardLutheran Heritage

If policy explicitly restricts Section 7 activities, then it is unlawful

If not explicitly restrictive, then ask if:

1. employees would reasonably construe language to prohibit Section 7 activity;

2. rule was promulgated in response to union activity; or

3. rule has been applied to restrict exercise of Section 7 rights.

14

Page 15: Labor Law Update: GIRN – October 15, 2014 Stefan Jan Marculewicz, Esq. Littler Mendelson, P.C. Washington, DC Office 202.423.2415 smarculewicz@littler.com.

Examples of policies found illegal

Courtesy, respect or proper behavior– “No one should be disrespectful or use profanity or any other

language which injures the image or reputation of the Dealership” - Unlawful. Knauz BMW

– Policy that “[a]llows for discipline of employees for their on-line statements that damage the company, defame any individual or damage any person’s reputation.” – Unlawful. Costco

Confidentiality of investigations– Blanket prohibition unlawful. Confidentiality requirement

permissible in certain cases. Banner Health System15

Page 16: Labor Law Update: GIRN – October 15, 2014 Stefan Jan Marculewicz, Esq. Littler Mendelson, P.C. Washington, DC Office 202.423.2415 smarculewicz@littler.com.

More examples

Media relations policies– Rule prohibiting employees from agreeing “not to give any information to

the news media ... without prior authorization from the general manager and to direct such inquiries to his attention” Unlawful – Remington Lodging

At will policies– "I further agree that the at-will employment relations cannot be

amended, modified, or altered in any way” – Unlawful. American Red Cross

Social media policies– Policies that create the reasonable impression that employees cannot

exercise their Section 7 rights while using social media.

– “Likes” are protected 16

Page 17: Labor Law Update: GIRN – October 15, 2014 Stefan Jan Marculewicz, Esq. Littler Mendelson, P.C. Washington, DC Office 202.423.2415 smarculewicz@littler.com.

What to Expect in the Next 2 Years

A more active and aggressive NLRB– Willingness to change established principles of law

– Strengthening employee and Section 7 rights and derivative union rights

– Weakening employer property rights

– Encouraging organizing

– Enhancing remedies

Enlistment of other government agencies– OSHA, DOL, DOJ, State Department (OECD NCP)

17

Page 18: Labor Law Update: GIRN – October 15, 2014 Stefan Jan Marculewicz, Esq. Littler Mendelson, P.C. Washington, DC Office 202.423.2415 smarculewicz@littler.com.

Innovative and creative approaches by organized labor

18

Page 19: Labor Law Update: GIRN – October 15, 2014 Stefan Jan Marculewicz, Esq. Littler Mendelson, P.C. Washington, DC Office 202.423.2415 smarculewicz@littler.com.

Innovative and Creative Approaches

Worker Centers or U.F.O.’s “Issue Only” or social movement campaigns Minority representation Deploy strategies familiar in EU countries– Hire European trade unionists

– Works Councils in the United States

Hijack Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives

19

Page 20: Labor Law Update: GIRN – October 15, 2014 Stefan Jan Marculewicz, Esq. Littler Mendelson, P.C. Washington, DC Office 202.423.2415 smarculewicz@littler.com.

Worker Centers/UFO’s

Very active movement in the U.S. today– Street theater and social media

Offer publicly palatable “workers rights” case more acceptable to the public than a traditional labor union – Create the appearance of a grass roots movement/strikes

– Financed, managed and promoted by established labor unions

Convert the campaign from one over representation to one about a social movement

Examples: Fight for $15, Retail Action Project, Rising up in Retail, OUR Walmart, Warehouse Workers for Justice, etc.

Include international angle and GUF’s20

Page 21: Labor Law Update: GIRN – October 15, 2014 Stefan Jan Marculewicz, Esq. Littler Mendelson, P.C. Washington, DC Office 202.423.2415 smarculewicz@littler.com.

Issue Only/Social Movement

Minimum/Living Wage campaigns– Fight for 15, etc.

– Predictable and sufficient hours

– Easy translation to public forum

– Create policy case for local legislative action

Takes the union and its institutional interests out of the discussion

21

Page 22: Labor Law Update: GIRN – October 15, 2014 Stefan Jan Marculewicz, Esq. Littler Mendelson, P.C. Washington, DC Office 202.423.2415 smarculewicz@littler.com.

Minority Representation

Largely a tactic of the UAW (also UE at facility in North Carolina)– Establish a “local” union at facility union wishes to organize

– Union represents only is members

– Objective is to change working conditions on behalf of members only

Blue Eagle at Work– Staged theory of representation. Members only

representation precedes exclusive representation

Inconsistent with historical interpretation of law– However, Specialty Healthcare has changed that 22

Page 23: Labor Law Update: GIRN – October 15, 2014 Stefan Jan Marculewicz, Esq. Littler Mendelson, P.C. Washington, DC Office 202.423.2415 smarculewicz@littler.com.

Deploy Tactics Familiar in EU Countries

Staffing– Hire European trade unionists to “engage”

company in manner similar to that in European countries

Engage unions from home country– Expectations to be reasonable and consultative

– Divide U.S. leadership from leadership in Europe

Works councils– Try to establish works council in the United States23

Page 24: Labor Law Update: GIRN – October 15, 2014 Stefan Jan Marculewicz, Esq. Littler Mendelson, P.C. Washington, DC Office 202.423.2415 smarculewicz@littler.com.

Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives

Establish leadership position in multi-stakeholder organization and pursue agenda– Put forth IFA-style policy through motions, etc.

– An alternative to an IFA, only one that utilizes an established organization to host the labor principles, and an established dispute-resolution mechanism to enforce them separate from national law

Example of FSC/PEFC– Efforts of U.S. union International Association of

Machinists and BWI global union federation. 24

Page 25: Labor Law Update: GIRN – October 15, 2014 Stefan Jan Marculewicz, Esq. Littler Mendelson, P.C. Washington, DC Office 202.423.2415 smarculewicz@littler.com.

THANK YOU

Stefan Jan Marculewicz, Esq.Littler Mendelson, P.C.Washington, DC [email protected]