Labador 9 Mw Hug Project

52
Potential Labrador HUG* This concentrated power within water can become the power of future technology Romain Audet [email protected] November 30, 2010 * HUG: Helical Unique Generation

Transcript of Labador 9 Mw Hug Project

Potential Labrador HUG*

This concentrated power within water can become the power of future technology

Romain [email protected]

November 30, 2010* HUG: Helical Unique Generation

Capturing the Vortex Power of Water

We have all experienced vortexes in our lives: the fast draining sink. The earth’s gravitational force aligns the water molecules in one clockwise

direction. This alignment speeds up the flow.

Romain [email protected] 30, 2010

Helical Pathway Patent

The HUG Patent explained: Oval helical turbines harness kinetic energy are inserted in a Helical Pathway System in fast flowing waters.

An 80 page Patent (44 images) has been registered. None of the 44 images appear in this presentation.

Romain [email protected]

November 30, 2010

Secret #1

The Venturi Funnel

The pre-twist-generator, the Venturi funnel creates a spiraling flow, which increases the velocity. Romain Audet

[email protected] 30, 2010

Secret #2 The Energy Body

Viktor Schauberger, a physicist, discovered the phenomenon of the Energy Body.

These egg-shaped bodies align the flow. The current then re-establishes it’s natural,

dynamic flow, which increases its velocity.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5643559434275921302 Video: Theories Viktor Schauberger (Time: 1:48)

Romain [email protected] 30, 2010

The Vanes

Secret #3

Vanes are like airplane wings, which redirect the current toward the blades of the helical turbine. Romain Audet

[email protected] 30, 2010

Helical Pathway Patent

The HUG Patent explained: Oval helical turbines harness kinetic energy: they are inserted in a Helical Pathway System in fast flowing waters.

An 80 page Patent (44 images) has been registered. The 44 images of the Patent do not appear in this

presentation.

Secret #4

Romain [email protected] 30, 2010

The Environmental HUG

The helical turbine does not create turbulence, so small objects are harmlessly swept through.

Helical turbines create a pressure barrier, which keep fish away. Fish migration continues outside of helical modules. There are no chopped fish by turbines where they have been

installed.

Romain [email protected]

November 30, 2010

An expensive Fish Ladder will notnot be necessarywith HUG.

Helical Turbines:Environmental Zero Effects

Romain [email protected]

November 30, 2010

People requiring resettlement: zerozero Areas flooded: zerozeroDam Reservoir unsuitable for fish: zerozeroNatural habitats affected: zerozeroAdverse noise & visual impact: zerozeroTwo million mTwo million m33 of concrete for a dam: of concrete for a dam: saved

The Helical Turbine is the Most Efficient: 35%35%

35%16% 18% 20% 24%

Propeller turbines have an efficiency of 20% compared to the Helical Turbine (35%).

Romain [email protected] 30, 2010

Oval Helical HUGHUG Power

The Sweeping Area of Turbines = 3.26 m2 (1.36 m x 2.4 m) has a power of 575 kW/turbinekW/turbine.

A community, which requires a minimum of 1.73 MW of power in winter, will need a 3-Oval Turbine HUGHUG.

Romain [email protected] 30, 2010

Helical Turbines in Open Water

Helical Turbines have been successfully developed over the last 15 years.

Gorlov Experimental Helical Turbine

Romain [email protected] 30, 2010

The Helical Pathway uses Large Spiraling Pipes.

Romain [email protected] 30, 2010

Commercially Viable New Technology

Investment in helical turbines has

increased from US$13 million in 2004

to US$257 million (Korea) in 2007.

Romain [email protected] 30, 2010

Comparative Low Cost Alternative

• The Helical Turbine System has the lowest Energy Installation Costs.

Romain [email protected]

November 30, 2010

Electricity & Fossil Fuel Energy

Energy costs of diesel electricity (not including capital costs) are very high: $0.63 per kWh vs. $$0.0.1515//kWkWhh for HUGHUG.

Romain [email protected]

November 30, 2010

Small Hydro Power

Canada has tremendous potential for small hydro development with more than 5500 identified sites (11,000 MW), which require no dams or barrages.

Romain [email protected]

November 30, 2010

Positive Pressure Problem Positive Pressure Problem

Romain [email protected]

November 30, 2010

16% 18% 20% 24%

Positive Pressure becomes the problem: the flow upstream senses an obstacle and swirls away. Water never flows in a straight line.

Other Tidal TurbinesMost turbines act as an obstruction resulting in a build-up of pressure upstream.In contrast, the HUGHUG system invites a current, because of the suction from its negative pressure.

Romain [email protected] 30, 2010

Green EnergyGreen Energy: Not Profitable -- Yet No currently operating commercial turbines are

connected to an electric-power transmission or distribution grid for good reason:

High Cost $2.2 MillionHigh Cost $2.2 Million. = .5 x 78 m2 x (2.5 m/s)3 = 609 kW/turbine

x .33 (efficiency): 200 kW/turbine200 kW/turbine

Power density:2.6 kW/m2

Romain [email protected]

November 30, 2010

Negative Pressure Solution Negative Pressure Solution

16% 18% 20% 24%

The secret is to create a Helical Pathway System. The velocity of the flow inside this System

increases 4x 4x ,, thereby introducing a sucking action which scientist call a Negative Pressure .

Romain [email protected] 30, 2010

The Vortex Pathway

Romain [email protected]

November 30, 2010

16% 18% 20% 24%

The Vortex Pathway, HUGHUG, creates a vortex.

The entrance of the HUGHUG has a negative pressure or a sucking action, created from the general spiral centripetal motion.

The Velocity in the flume of the HUGHUG is four times faster than placing the turbine directly in the path of the ocean or tide.

Velocity is King:

Romain [email protected]

November 30, 2010

The most critical factor is the Velocity of the flow. A tripling of the Velocity from 1.5 m/s* multiplies the Kinetic Energy (KE) by 33 or 27X, by the formula:

KE= ½ x  A x V 3 x efficiency (A = area swept; Velocity) = ½ x 3.26 m2 x (8.3 m/s*)3 x .35 = 326 kW/turbine

Red Area denotes High Red Area denotes High Velocity of Flow.Velocity of Flow.

98 kW/m2

* Based on a discharge of 27 m3s per A of 3.26 m2

Near Watchman Island

Romain [email protected]

November 30, 2010

Kingurutik Lake and RiverRomain Audet

[email protected] 30, 2010

Rapids

Rapids

Port Hope SimpsonRomain Audet

[email protected] 30, 2010

Natuashish and the Notakwanon River

13N14

Romain [email protected]

November 30, 2010

Lewis River at Port Hope SimpsonRomain Audet

[email protected] 30, 2010

Muskrat Falls at Churchill River

Romain [email protected]

November 30, 2010

Postville Romain [email protected]

November 30, 2010

Rapids: 15 km from Voisey Bay ProjectRomain Audet

[email protected] 30, 2010

Near Voisy BayRomain Audet

[email protected] 30, 2010

Uyagalatok Rapids 75 km North of Voisy Bay

Romain [email protected]

November 30, 2010

Goose BayRomain Audet

[email protected] 30, 2010

Final Velocity of Waterfall

(Final Velocity)2 = V2 + 2 x a x s, where V is Initial Velocity

Acceleration = a = g (acceleration of gravity)= 9.8 ms2

V= 8.3 m/s at the first top turbine

Final Velocity = 15.66 m/s for 9 m distance (s) of the crest of a waterfall

Formula:

Romain [email protected] 30, 2010

9 Turbines in a Waterfall• Initial Power of First Turbine in a WaterfallKE = ½ x  A x V 3 x efficiency (A = area swept; Velocity) = ½ x 3.26 m2 x (8.3 m/s*)3 x .35 = 326 kW/turbine

• Final Power of the Last Turbine = ½ x 3.26 m2 x (15.66 m/s*)3 x .35 = 1,258 kW/turbine

• Final Power of the 9 Turbine (by averaging) = (326 + 1,258)/2 x 9 turbines = 11.32 MW

Romain [email protected] 30, 2010

1.25MW/Turbine

The HUG Prototype

1,682 MWh can sustain 1,360 average households annually@ 12,000 kilowatt-hours (KWh)/household.

Romain [email protected]

November 30, 2010

The HUG Prototype: 0.24 MWOne Twin Oval Helical Turbine: Length: 5 m; Head: 3 m; Depth 6m

 

   1 Modular Helical Pathway, Helical Turbine & Vanes & Striations (62%) $324,000

Control System & Generators & Converters for DIFG 0.24 MW: (9.5%) 50,000

Transmission and Grid Connection: (11.5%) 60,000

Module Anchors & Slot Construction (1.25m) $1,500/m x (50m) (17%) 90,000

Subtotal

$524,000

Contingency, Insurance, Legal costs, Bank fees, Interest (15%) 78,600

Total Helical Turbine System Cost

$602,600

Engineering Planning and Design (15%) 90,000

Promotion Patent Fee (10%)

60,000Total Costs: 0.24 MW $3,136/KW

$752,600

80% utilization rate: 1,682 MWh * [x $79/MWh (Quebec) $133,000/yr or 17.517.5%%/yr./yr. (ROI) ]Annual Return on Investment (ROI): (Ontario FIT) (x $131/MWh) $220,000 = 29%/yr.29%/yr.

*The designated Fee is initially offered to promoters (under contract). The fees for succeeding systems will be allocated to community development (4%) and patent fee

(1%).

HUG Pilot Project

Romain [email protected]

November 30, 2010

28 Turbines @ $8,750 $245,00028 Submersible Generator @ $5,000

 140,000

1 Module Cylindrical HUG     1,250,000Module Anchors & Civil Works 2,440,000Control System 407,000Electric Power Converter/Generator for 6.7MW DFIG

                 593,000

Transmission and Grid Connection          86,000Electrical Connections        550,000Electrical and Mechanical Overhead        114,000Subtotal $5,825,000Contingency, Insurance, Legal costs, Bank fees, Interest: (15%)

875,000

Total Helical Turbine System Cost $6,700,000Engineering Planning and Design (15%) 1,005,000Patent Promotion Fee* (10%) 670,000 Total Costs: 6.7 MW $1,250/kW (.178/kWh) $8,375,000 •The designated Fee is initially offered to promoters (under contract). The fees for

succeeding systems will be allocated to management fees (5%), community development (4%) and patent fee (1%).

80% utilization: 47,000 MWh [x $79 (Quebec)] $3,700,000: ROI = 44% Annual Return on Investment: (Ontario FIT) (using $131/MWh) $6,150,000 = 73%

The First 6.7 MW Prototype HUG SystemHUG Length: 31 m; Diameter/Depth: 6 m; Twin Oval Helical Turbines: 28 

HUG Pilot Project

Romain [email protected]

November 30, 2010

42 Turbines @ $8,750 $368,00042 Submersible Generator @ $5,000

 210,000

1 Module Cylindrical HUG     1,250,000Module Anchors & Civil Works 1,625,000Control System 610,000Electric Power Converter/Generator for 9 MW DFIG

                 890,000

Transmission and Grid Connection          128,000Electrical Connections        825,000Electrical and Mechanical Overhead        171,000Subtotal $6,077,000Contingency, Insurance, Legal costs, Bank fees, Interest: (15%)

912,000

Total Helical Turbine System Cost $6,989,000Engineering Planning and Design (15%) 1,048,000Patent Promotion Fee* (10%)Cost of Living & Extra Transportation Cost (10%)

699,000699,000

Total Costs: 9.0 MW $1048/kW (.149/kWh) $9,435,000

* The designated Fee is initially offered to promoters (under contract). The fees for succeeding systems will be allocated to management fees (5%), community development (4%) and patent fee (1%).

80% utilization: 63,000 MWh [x $79 (Quebec)] $5,000,000: ROI = 53%

Annual Return on Investment: (Ontario FIT) (using $131/MWh) $8,250,000 = 87%

The First 9 MW Prototype HUG SystemHUG Length: 45 m; Diameter/Depth: 6 m; Twin Oval Helical Turbines: 42 

The HUG Turbine System can help you:

Romain [email protected] 30, 2010

•Develop a leading role in this new technology, which allows you to go international.

•Allow you to expand in entirely new markets, because of the flexibility of HUG.

•Develop a ready USA market for Water Export. •Allow you to find support in green energy and innovation government programs, in order to reduce any risk factors.

The HUG Turbine is Profitable

Romain [email protected]

August 19, 2010

• Allows one to license the technology for an initial high fee in a monopolistic position

• Allows one to keep profits high. (using Ontario FIT Guaranteed sale price of $131/MWh or

Quebec prices of $79/MWh less your cost of $5.46/MWh).

• Allowing one to sell up a Private Public Partnership for a very high initial return and a reasonable annual return for managing the project.

• Earns extra revenue from the sale of carbon credits.

Wind Turbine Power

Since wind turbines are so unpredictable, conventional power plants have to serve as back-ups. These run at less than half power most of the time. This is all terribly uneconomical. Romain Audet

[email protected] 30, 2010

2000 Wind Turbines is four times more costly than one HUG System, because water is 1,000 times denser than air.

Electricity & Fossil Fuel Energy

Romain [email protected] 30, 2010

Energy costs of diesel electricity (not including capital costs) are high: $0.63 per kWh. ($0.05/kWh for electricity)

135 million people in the five countries studied spend $3.4 billion/yr ($25 each) on imported kerosene lighting needlessly. Energy sources:

coal & natural gas

This Project Reduces Global Warming.

Companies that exceed the emission limits must soon buy credits of $1.9 million/year worth of carbon credits, from the 6.7 MW of new clean energy, which will add to our revenue.

Romain [email protected]

November 30, 2010

Clean Energy Demands The goal should be a 50% reduction in global carbon-dioxide emissions by the

middle of the century. This means every year the world needs: 30 new nuclear plants 17,000 windmills 400 biomass power plants Two hydroelectric facilities the size of China's massive Three Gorges Dam 42 coal and gas power plants with yet-to-be-developed carbon-capture technology

Romain [email protected]

November 30, 2010

Capital Investments per Worker* Canada has also developed one of the most

generous research-and-development tax schemes in the industrialized world.

Yet, Canadian firms do not have R&D rates "anywhere near the levels" of other countries.

Canada's abysmal productivity record may be the result of a business sector that lacks daring and the killer instinct of its U.S. counterpart.

* A study from Toronto-Dominion Bank: Capital investments per worker after 2005 remained "well below" U.S. levels.

Romain [email protected]

AUGUST 9, 2010

Subsidizing Inefficient Technology

Fortunately, there is a smarter way to deal with global warming: we make green energy cheaper.

The miracle of the modern age -- the personal computer didn't become household items because governments subsidized purchases or forced up the price of typewriters.

Typewriter Man Romain [email protected] 30, 2010

Funding Basic Research

The R&D that got Neil Armstrong to the moon in 1969 made it possible for Apple to introduce the first Mac in 1976.

Forget about subsidizing inefficient technologies or making fossil fuels too expensive to use.

Instead, let's fund the basic research that will make green energy too cheap and easy to resist.

Romain [email protected]

November 30, 2010

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

NSERC invests more than $2-billion annually in technology R&D incentives for Manufacturing, Energy Resources & Northern Development, etc.

The Scientific Research and Experimental Development (SR&ED) program provide an investment tax credit (ITC) of 35%.

Average Strategic Project: $120,000 Average Discovery Grant: $30,000

Romain [email protected]

November 30, 2010

NSERC Short List

Baird Engineering & Sciences Hatch Associates Ltd Hydro-Québec Oceanworks International Corporation Risk Services: Ontario Power Generation Inc. Siemens Westinghouse Tecsult

Romain [email protected]

November 30, 2010

Win Win for Canada!Win Win for Canada! Economic advantages to Canada: to offset

the global warming “bite”: This has tremendous political, financial, 

and psychological advantages to unite various factions in Canada and promote Canadian pride by uniting Aboriginal, Quebec, Ontario and Western interests.

Romain Audet

[email protected] 30, 2010

A Call to Action !A Call to Action !Canada is an Expert in Large-Scale

Infrastructure-Building ProgramsCanada supports clean electricity

technology, which then can be imported.

It is time to build political and social solution, which is “Made in CanadaMade in Canada”.

Romain [email protected]

November 30, 2010