KYOVA Street flooding mitigation plan · Presentation Title February 9, 2018 Page 6 ... Freight...
Transcript of KYOVA Street flooding mitigation plan · Presentation Title February 9, 2018 Page 6 ... Freight...
Street Flooding Mitigation Plan
KYOVA Interstate Planning Commission
Presented to AMPO National Conference – October 18, 2017
Saleem Salameh, Ph.D., P.E., M.ASCE
Chet Parsons, AICP CTP
Background
Flood Event: December 25, 2015
Agenda:
Background
Approach
Stormwater Model
Green Infrastructure
Travel Patterns
(TransCAD) / Closure
Recommendations
Cost Estimates
Prioritization
Implementation
Lessons Learned
• TMA designation in July 18, 2012
• TMA Population – 202,637 (urbanized)
• MSA Population ~ 365,000 (also includes
one other county in WV)
• KYOVA Planning Boundary grew
• Now includes Boyd and Greenup
counties in Kentucky and Putnam County
in West Virginiao RIC, the MPO in Charleston is taking lead in planning
responsibilities for Putnam County
Huntington, WV-KY-OH Urbanized area Transportation Management Area
Evaluate and address mobility issues due to flooding and related events
Identify stormwater improvements to positively impact the traffic network
Identify mitigation measures that can be taken to decrease the likelihood of future catastrophic events
Study the flow of all traffic (motorized and non-motorized) through the identified problem areas
What is the Project Purpose?
February 9, 2018Presentation Title Page 6
National Goals
Safety Infrastructure Condition Congestion Reduction System ReliabilityFreight Movement &
Economic Vitality
Environmental SustainabilityReduced Project Delivery
Delays
February 9, 2018 Page 7
What are the effective dates for the rules establishing performance measures under 23
U.S.C. 150(c), 49 U.S.C. 5326, and 49 U.S.C. 5329 and the associated two-year phase-in
dates for the planning requirements in 23 CFR Part 450?
Final RulePublication
DateEffective Date
Two-Year Phase-In Date
Statewide, Nonmetropolitan, and Metropolitan Transportation Planning
May 27, 2016
June 27, 2016
May 27, 2018*
Highway Safety Performance Measures (PM #1)
March 15,2016
April 14, 2016
May 27, 2018**
Pavement and Bridge Condition Performance Measures (PM #2)
January 18,2017
May 20, 2017
May 20, 2019
System Performance, Freight, and CMAQ Performance Measures (PM #3) ***
January 18, 2017
May 20, 2017
May 20, 2019
Transit Asset Management July 26,
2016October 1, 2016 October 1, 2018
Public Transportation Safety Program August 11,
2016September 12,
2016September 12,
2018
*23 CFR 450.340 references the planning rule’s publication date instead of the effective date**The two year phase-in date for the highway safety performance measures is May 27, 2018 because that date is later than the date two years after the effective date of the final rule (i.e. April 14, 2018), per the Federal Register notice for the planning rule [html]*** Greenhouse gas performance measure indefinitely delayed by FHWA’s Federal Register notice on May 19, 2017 [html]
Transportation Planning Measures (TPM)
PM #1
PM #2
PM #3
When are MPOs required to include a description of anticipated performance target achievement in
their TIPs/MTP’s?
New, updated, or amended TIP adopted
on or after:
Highway Safety
Targets(PM #1)
Pavement and Bridge Condition
Targets (PM #2)
System Performance,
Freight, and CMAQTargets*(PM#3)
Transit Asset Management
Targets
Public Transportation Safety
ProgramTargets
May 27, 2018
September 12, 2018
October 1, 2018
May 20, 2019
* Greenhouse gas performance measure indefinitely delayed by FHWA’s Federal Register notice on May 19, 2017 [html]
Context
Project Approach
• Multi-modal transportation issues: CSX rail network, pedestrian traffic, transit
• Pedestrian and bike facilities connecting the main routes
• Improved connections and flexibility
Circulation
• Sustainable transportation network
• Green infrastructure strategy that complements the failing storm system
• Future economic stability and growth
Stormwater & Green Infrastructure
• Tools to bring vision to reality
• Options for future funding of projects
Implementation of Plans
• Open, accessible process for stakeholder involvement
• Coordination with community groups and leadership
• Use the community’s unique insights
Public Participation
Bike/Pedestrian
Vehicular
Incident Response
EMS
Data Collection
Stormwater Model Development
August 22, 2014
Stormwater Model Development
PROJECT APPROACH:
H&H MODEL DEVELOPMENT
Green Infrastructure
June 4, 2010
Green Infrastructure
Stormwater & Green Infrastructure: Green alleys
Stormwater & Green Infrastructure: Bioretention Boulevards/ Cascade Rain
Gardens
Stormwater & Green Infrastructure: Bioretention Islands
Stormwater & Green Infrastructure: Bioretention Bumpouts
Stormwater & Green Infrastructure: Permeable Pavement
Stormwater & Green Infrastructure: Bio-Tree Trench
Travel Patterns and Closure
Impacts
January 27, 1937
Travel Patterns and Closure Impacts
Transportation & circulation
Simulate closures
Closure Impacts
Performance Results
1st
8th
10th
16th
20th
3rd
5th
Performance Results
1st
8th
10th
16th
20th
3rd
5th
Benefit-Cost
Scenario and analysis
Scenario 10 chosen as test case
Avoid closure at Hal Greer, 20th Street Underpass, 3rd Avenue, 5th Avenue
Implementation of Optimized Alternative #1
Benefits assumed based on VHT/VMT from 2040 Scenario 10 vs 2040 No-Build
Assumed implementation in 2025 and 2026
Benefits include:
Safety due to avoided VMT
Safety due to improved bike-ped connectivity
Travel time / cost savings
Reduced emissions
Reliability
Residiual Value
Emergency Response
Property Premium
Costs include:
Capital Costs
Continuous O&M
Recommendations
June 3, 2008
Recommendations
This test case focused on CSO #12 to mitigate flooding in the Hal Greer Boulevard
underpass. The proposed alternatives were evaluated for the following goals:
Eliminate underpass flooding up to a 5-year design storm.
Eliminate the localized flooding issues within the basin.
Reduce the number of CSO events per City of Huntington, WV Long Term
Control Plan (LTCP).
Improve water quality.
Green Infrastructure
Optimized Alternative
#1
Preferred Alternatives Comparison
Surface Overflow
Undersized Sewer
Pump Station
Ohio River
Existing Conditions
Separation #1A
Separation #1
Separation #3
Optimized #1
Preferred Alternatives Comparison
Complete Streets
The plan identified 9 projects in Huntington where CSO improvements, roadway
improvements, and rightsizing, coupled with installation of green infrastructure,
can achieve these goals:
Reduce impervious surfaces throughout the city and increase groundwater recharge and
retention of stormwater
Reduce vehicle speeds and make drivers more aware of their surroundings
Create community identity and provide a sense of place for each corridor
Improve safety for all travel modes
Provide opportunities for users, regardless of economic status, and reduce dependence
on single driver trips
Encourage redevelopment and community investment
Complete Streets: 5th Avenue Part 1
Business Area (29th Street to 20th Street)Current configuration: Four travel lanes (one way - east)
Planned configuration: Three 11-foot travel lanes with a dedicated two-way cycle track, and bioretention
swales adjacent to sidewalks. Pavement updated with porous asphalt or pervious pavers under the cycle
track.
University Area (20th Street to 16th Street)Current configuration: Four travel lanes (one way - east)
Planned configuration: Two 11-foot travel lanes and an 8-foot two-way cycle track on the north side. Include
a 10-foot center pedestrian refuge with bioretention bulbs. Install parallel parking on both sides. On the north
side, install 6-foot sidewalk and a 6-foot green buffer. On the south side, install 6-foot sidewalk and 6-foot
green buffer. Pavement updated with porous asphalt under the cycle track. At either end of this section of
corridor, there would be an opportunity to establish gateway wayfinding to the Marshall University academic
campus
Residential Area (16th Street to 13th Street)Current configuration: Four travel lanes (one way - east)
Planned configuration: Two 11-foot travel lanes and an 8-foot two-way cycle track on the north side. Include
a 10-foot center pedestrian refuge with bioretention bulbs. Install parallel parking on both sides. On the north
side, install 6-foot sidewalk and a 6-foot green buffer. On the south side, install 6-foot sidewalk and 6-foot
green buffer. Pavement updated with porous asphalt under the cycle track
Complete Streets: 5th
Avenue Part 1
Stadium Area (25th
Street to 16th Street)
University Area (20th
Street to 16th Street)
Complete Streets: 5th Avenue Part 1
Residential Area (16th
Street to 13th Street)
Complete Streets: 16th Street
Underpass Area (8th Avenue to 7th Avenue)
Current configuration: 2+2 travel lanes (bi-directional) with 4-foot sidewalk on west side and 2-foot sidewalk
on east side
Planned configuration: Two 11-foot travel lanes, a center turn lane with bioretention islands, and an
elevated bicycle / multiuse path on the east side. Pavement updated with porous asphalt or pervious pavers
under the multi-use path
University Area (7th Avenue to 5th Avenue)
Current configuration: 2+2 travel lanes (bi-directional) with 12-foot sidewalk and street parking on both
sides from 7th Avenue north to the alley and then 2+2 travel lanes (bi-directional) with center striped turn
lanes and 12-foot sidewalk on both sides from the alley north to 5th Avenue.
Planned configuration: Two 11-foot travel lanes with a 6-foot center pedestrian refuge, street parking on one
side, a dedicated two-way cycle track, and bioretention swales adjacent to sidewalks. Pavement updated with
porous asphalt or pervious pavers under parking areas and cycle track. The northbound Hal Greer Boulevard
and 5th Avenue intersection presents an opportunity to establish gateway wayfinding to the Marshall
University academic campus and the stadium
Complete Streets: 16th
Street
University Area (7th
Avenue to 5th Avenue)
Underpass Area (8th
Avenue to 7th Avenue)
Prioritization
January 27, 1937
Costs & Prioritization
Hard/Veg/Perm
Project Prioritization
Project Phasing
Implementation
January 27, 1937
Implementation
Funding Toolkit
Lessons Learned
August 22, 2014
Lessons Learned
Maintenance Regularly maintain infrastructure – water, transportation, etc
Patience No quick fix for resilience issues. Takes many overlapping plans
Real Numbers Budgets should reflect real need, no matter how tall the task
A Real Team Effort Solutions are multi-modal and cross-disciplinary
Community Ultimately a quality of life decision
What do we know?
Street Flooding Mitigation Plan
KYOVA Interstate Planning Commission
Presented to AMPO National Conference – October 18, 2017