KYIV NATIONAL UNIVERSITY

9
1

Transcript of KYIV NATIONAL UNIVERSITY

Page 1: KYIV NATIONAL UNIVERSITY

1

Page 2: KYIV NATIONAL UNIVERSITY

2

Page 3: KYIV NATIONAL UNIVERSITY

3

Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

Institute of Geology

Department: General and Historical Geology

«APPROVED»

Deputy director on academic work ______________________

«____»____________2020

WORK PROGRAMME OF THE DISCIPLINE GEOLOGICAL RISKS AND HAZARDS

For students

Branch of knowledge: 10 – Natural sciences Training direction (Speciality): 103 – Earth sciences Educational level: Master Educational program: Applied Geology Type of discipline: Obligatory

Teaching mode full-time studies Academic year 2020/2021 Semester 2 Number of credits ECTS 6 Language of teaching, learning and evaluation

English

Form of final control Exam

Lecturer(s): Ivanik Olena Mykhailivna, Doctor of science in geology, Professor, Department of General and Historical Geology To be continued

© ______________, 202___ © ______________, 202___ © ______________, 202___

KYIV – 2020

Page 4: KYIV NATIONAL UNIVERSITY

4

Author(s): Ivanik Olena Mykhailivna, Doctor of science in geology, Professor, Department of General and Historical Geology

«Approved»

«____» ______________ 2020

Head of the Department of General and Historical Geology

_______________________( Ivanik O.M.) Record of the Department meeting

№ _1__, «_4_» __September__ 2020

Approved by Scientific-Methodical Commission of the Institute of Geology

Record of the meeting №__1__, «___14_» ____September____, 2020

Head of Scientific-Methodical Commission ____________ (Demydov V.K.)

« » , 2020

Page 5: KYIV NATIONAL UNIVERSITY

5

1. Aim of the discipline is the acquaintance with characteristics of natural hazard processes

according to various structural, tectonic, landscape and climatic areas, classification features, modern methods and technologies of research these processes and assessing their impact on the infrastructures

2. Discipline requirements: Students must have skills and knowledge in the field of developing of integrated geological and geophysical models using specialized software, and theoretical knowledge related to such subjects as "General Geology", "Structural Geology" "Geomorphology and Quaternary Geology", "GIS in Geology". 3. Annotation of teaching discipline / reference: The discipline discusses the natural hazardous processes of varying genesis and their occurrence within various structural and tectonic areas, classification of natural hazardous processes, modern approaches and methods of their study, analysis of their impact on the infrastructure, including risk assessment

4. Object (teaching purposes) – introduction of students with:

1) classification and main types of natural hazardous processes in various structural and tectonic areas;

2) main methods of the field investigation of the natural hazardous processes; 3) methods of laboratory simulation of the natural hazardous processes; 4) functional ability of special software for modelling of natural hazards; 5) interpretation of modelling results; 6) main approaches to the assessment and mitigation of natural risks and elaboration of

preventive measures; 5. Learning results: Learning results (1. to know; 2. be able to; 3. communication; 4. autonomy and responsibility)

Form/Methods of teaching and

studing

Form / Methods of evaluation

Percentage in the final assessment

of the discipline

Code Learning results

1.1 Manifestation of geological hazardous processes in various structural and tectonic areas

lecture, self-tuition written work

up to 9.0%

1.2 Classifications of natural hazards lecture, self-tuition

written work

up to 9.0%

1.3 Methods of field investigation of the geological hazardous processes

lecture, self-tuition written work

up to 9.0%

1.4 Methods of laboratory simulation of the natural hazardous processes

lecture, self-tuition written work

up to 9.0%

1.5 Modeling methods of the natural hazardous processes

lecture, self-tuition written work

up to 9.0%

1.6 Main approaches to the assessment and mitigation of natural risks and elaboration of preventive measures

practical assignments, self-tuition

written work

up to 9.0%

2.1 Classify the natural hazards according to classification categories and groups

lecture, self-tuition written work

up to 9.0%

2.2 Develop the geological and geophysical models of natural hazardous processes

lecture, self-tuition written work

up to 9.0%

2.3 Develop the mathematical models of natural hazardous processes

practical assignments, self-tuition

written work

up to 9.0%

2.4 Develop the algorithms for modeling the impact of natural hazards on the natural and man-made

practical assignments, self-

written work

up to 10.0%

Page 6: KYIV NATIONAL UNIVERSITY

6

systems tuition

2.5 Assess the impact of natural hazards on the infrastructure objects

lecture, self-tuition written work

up to 9.0%

Structure of the discipline: lectures, practical works and seminars, and self-studying work of students

6.Learning Outcomes and scheduled results of tuition:

Learning Outcomes

Program results of the tuition 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5

PO 1. Analyze natural and man-made systems and structures of the upper part of the Earth’s crust and its sedimentary layer.

* * *

PO 2. Apply your knowledge and skills for the identification and solving of challenging problems and undertaking informed decisions in the questions related to stratigraphy, structural geology, geological interpretation of geophysical data, and geological risks management

* * *

PO 7. Know modern methods of research of the upper part of the Earth's crust and sedimentary layer, their application in production and research activities.

* * * *

PO 9. Develop and implement projects of land management, perform geologic planning, monitor regional development trends, design land management plans and programs.

*

* * *

PO 10. Tackle practical challenges in tectonics, stratigraphy and geohazards monitoring using principles and methods of structural geology, micropaleonthology, geochemistry and geophysics.

*

* * *

PO 12. Plan and guide innovation research projects in tectonics, stratigraphy and geohazards analysis, draw conclusions after the implementation of a project.

* * * *

7.Scheme of grading forms: 7.1. Semester grading: 1) Test on classification and main types of natural hazardous processes - 10 points (cross-border score of 6 points) 2) Test on the main principles and approaches of the natural hazards risk assessment - 10 points (passing grade is 6 points) 3) Grading for work at practical classes - 40 points (passing grade is 24 points) Final examination in the form of the written test: maximum grade is 40 points, passing grade is 24 points. Results of educational activity of students grading are based on 100 grading scale.

Page 7: KYIV NATIONAL UNIVERSITY

7

The final grade is based on the results as the sum for the module grades, practical classes grades and the results of the Exam.

Semester grade Exam Final grade

I Module 1 Module 2

10 10

Practical classes Practical classes

20 20

Total

Minimum 18 18 24 60 Maximum 30 30 40 100 A student is not allowed to pass a Exam if he graded less than 20 points during two semesters. 7.2. Grading: Control is carried out according to the modular rating system and provides for: passing of 7 practical classes (where students must demonstrate the quality of the acquired knowledge and solve the tasks set using the methods outlined by the teacher); and passed 2 written tests. The final grading is carried out in the form of a written exam.

7.3. Scale of Exam

National scale 100 points scale

excellent 90 – 100 good 75 – 89

satisfactorily 60 – 74 Failed 0 – 59

Page 8: KYIV NATIONAL UNIVERSITY

8

8. PLAN OF LECTURES AND PRACTICAL CLASSES

No. Theme Total hours

Lectures Practical classes Self-studying work

1

Introduction. Theme 1. Classifications of natural hazardous processes in various structural, tectonic, landscape and climatic zones.

20/2*

2 25/30*

2 Theme 2. Main causes of hazardous processes and principles of their analysis 2

10/15*

3 Theme 3. Main principles and methods of assessing the impact of natural hazards on infrastructure

25/30*

Test 1 1

Module 2. Main principles and approaches of the natural hazards risk assessment

4 Theme 4. Development of geological, geophysical and mathematical models of natural hazardous processes.

22/2*

2 10/14*

5

Theme 5. Elaboration of the algorithms modeling the impact of natural hazards on the natural systems and man-made structures

2 20/22*

6 Theme 6. Main principles and approaches of the natural hazards risk assessment

2 10/16*

7 Theme 7. Designing preventive and corrective measures for mitigation of natural hazards

2 20/31*

Test 2 1

Exam

Total 42/4* 14 120/158* * - on the Individual Education Plan Total - 180 hours: Lectures – 42/4* hours, Practical classes – 14 hours Consultations – 4 hours Self-work – 120/158* hours *Themes for self-studying work: 1. Seismic hazards. 2. Effects of Tsunami and Linkages to other Natural Hazards. 3. Perception of and Adjustment to the Volcanic Hazards. 4.Human Interaction with flooding. 5. Assessment of Landslide Hazards 6. Subsidence and soils. 7. Coastal Hazards. 8. Climate change and Natural Hazards.

Page 9: KYIV NATIONAL UNIVERSITY

9

References:

General: 1. Edward A. Keller E., Duane E. DeVeccio. Natural hazards. Earth’s processes as hazards, disasters, and

catastrophes . Fifth edition. New Yourk:Routledge, 2019. 2. Natural Hazards, Risks and Resilience. Technical Manual / Ed. Department of Infrastructure, Local

Govermnebt and Planning, Queensland Government, 2016.- 45 p. 3. Bell F. C. Basic environmental and engineering geology / F. C. Bell. – Whittles Publishing, 2007. – 342

p. 4. Fookes P. G. Engeneering geomorphology. Theory and Practice / P. G. Fookes, E. M. Lee, J. S. Groffiths. –

Whittles Publishing, 2007. – 279 p. 5. Gershenfield N. The nature of Mathematical Modeling / N.Gershenfield. – Cambridge, 1999. – 344 p. 6. Mallet J.-L. Numerical Earth Model / J.-L. Mallet. – EAGE, 2008. – 147 p. 7. Natural Hazards. Public Health Considerations / Ed. Ministry of Health, New South Wales Government,

North Sydney, 2014 — 72 p. 8. Pelletier J. Quantitative modelling of Earth processes / J. Pelletier. – Cambridge, 2008. – 295 p. 9. Davis J.C. Statistics and Data Analysis in Geology // Wiley, 3-rd edition (2002) – 656 p.. 10. Ivanik, O., Shevchuk, V., Kravchenko, D., Yanchenko, V., Shpyrko, S., Gadiatska, K. (2019). Geological and

Geomorphological Factors of Natural Hazards in Ukrainian Carpathians. Journal of Ecological Engineering, 20(4), 177-186. https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/102964

11. Ivanik O., Shevchuк V., Kravchenko, D., Hadiatska K. Main causes of gravitation processes within the Middle Dnieper Region . - Visnyk of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv: Geology. – 3(86). – 2019. – P.70 – 74. http://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2713.86.10

12. Shevchuk V., Tustanovska L., Kravchenko D., Hadiatska K. Newest geodynamics reconstruction of the Middle Dnieper Region and its manifestations in the relief. - Visnyk of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv: Geology. - 2020. – 3(90). – P.12-17. DOI: http://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2713.90.02

13. .Ivanik O., Kravchenko D., Shevchuk V., Hadiatska K. Assessment of Natural Hazards in the Ukrainian Carpathians // Extended abstract: First EAGE Workshop on Assessment of Landslide and Debris Flows Hazards in the Carpathians, 2019, DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.201902157

14. Ivanik O., Shevchuk V., Yanchenko V., Kravchenko D., Hadiatska K. Geological Trip Field Guide // First EAGE Workshop on Assessment of Landslide and Debris Flows Hazards in the Carpathians. 2019

15. Ivanik O., Kaliukh I., Trofymchuk O., Farenyuk G. and Shekhunova S. Practical measures fo landslide risk mitigation in the Ukrainian Carpathians // Extended abstract: First EAGE Workshop on Assessment of Landslide and Debris Flows Hazards in the Carpathians, 2019, DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.2019021656

16. Ivanik O., Shevchuk V., Yanchenko V., Kravchenko D., Pikul S. and Mazko A. Geomorphological and geological causes of landslide processes within the Krosnien structural and facial zone (Ukrainian Carpathians) // Extended abstract: 18th International Conference on Geoinformatics - Theoretical and Applied Aspects, 2019 , DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.201902117

17. Ivanik O., Shevchuk V., Lavrenyuk M. and Kravchenko D. The main approaches of landslides classification and modeling of their impact on infrastructure // Conference Proceedings, Monitoring 2019, Nov 2019, Volume 2019, p.1 – 6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201903173

Additional: 18. A GIS-based landslide hazard assessment by multivariate analysis / X. Pan, H. Nakamura, T. Nozaki [et

al.]// Journal of the Japan Landslide Society/ – 2008. – Vol.45, No.3. – P. 187-195. 19. A method for the rapid assessment of the probability of post-wildfire debris flow from recently burned

basins in the intermountain west, U.S.A. / S. Cannon, J. Gartner, M. Rupert [et al.] // Geophysical Research Abstracts. – 2006. – Vol. 8, 02030. – P.125-129.

20. Cees J. Van Westen. The Modelling Of Landslide Hazards Using Gis / Cees J. Van Westen // Surveys in Geophysics. – 2000. – Vol. 21, No 2-3. P. 241-255.

21. GIS-based route planning in landslide-prone areas / K. Saha, M. K. Arora, R. P. Gupta [et al.] // International Journal of Geographical Information Science. – 2005. – Vol. 19, No. 10. – P. 1149–1175.

22. https://preview.grid.unep.ch/index.php?preview=map&lang=eng