Kpi Development Slide

15
1 1 2 2 3 3 PLAN TO CAPTURE ALL THE PLAN TO CAPTURE ALL THE QUALITY DEFECTS FROM QUALITY DEFECTS FROM CUSTOMER FEEDBACK CUSTOMER FEEDBACK CHECKING CRITERIA CHECKING CRITERIA QUESTIONNAIRE QUESTIONNAIRE FOLLOW UP THE ANY FOLLOW UP THE ANY IMPROVEMENT IMPROVEMENT UPDATE AND REVIEW LAYERED UPDATE AND REVIEW LAYERED PROCESS AUDIT PROCESS AUDIT LAYER PROCESS AUDIT LAYER PROCESS AUDIT IMPLEMENT IMPLEMENT QUESTIONNAIRE AS QUESTIONNAIRE AS CHECKING CRITERIA CHECKING CRITERIA + + ANALYZE THE CFR BY ANALYZE THE CFR BY PARETO CHARTS & PARETO CHARTS & IDENTIFY THE ROOT IDENTIFY THE ROOT CAUSES CAUSES 4 Sample of Layered Process Audit Form Sample of Layered Process Audit Form

Transcript of Kpi Development Slide

Page 1: Kpi  Development Slide

11 22

33

• PLAN TO CAPTURE ALL PLAN TO CAPTURE ALL THE QUALITY DEFECTS THE QUALITY DEFECTS FROM CUSTOMER FROM CUSTOMER FEEDBACKFEEDBACK

• CHECKING CRITERIA CHECKING CRITERIA QUESTIONNAIREQUESTIONNAIRE

• FOLLOW UP THE ANY FOLLOW UP THE ANY IMPROVEMENTIMPROVEMENT

• UPDATE AND REVIEW UPDATE AND REVIEW LAYERED PROCESS AUDITLAYERED PROCESS AUDIT

LAYER PROCESS AUDITLAYER PROCESS AUDIT

• IMPLEMENT IMPLEMENT QUESTIONNAIRE AS QUESTIONNAIRE AS CHECKING CRITERIACHECKING CRITERIA

++

• ANALYZE THE CFR BY ANALYZE THE CFR BY PARETO CHARTS & PARETO CHARTS & IDENTIFY THE ROOT IDENTIFY THE ROOT CAUSESCAUSES

44

Sample of Layered Process Audit FormSample of Layered Process Audit Form

Page 2: Kpi  Development Slide

Error Group vs Frequency for FREEZER ( 2008 )

2 2 2

1

29%

57%

86%

100%

0

1

2

3

05 - Refrigeration Circuit 50 - Mechanics 65 - Surfaces Device 40 - Electrics

Error Group

Freq

uenc

y

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Cum

ulat

ive

Per

cent

age

( % )

Frequency

Cumulative Percentage ( % )

Page 3: Kpi  Development Slide

Error Group vs Frequency for Wine Chiller ( 2008 )

3

2

1 1

3

4

29%

50%

71% 86%93%

100%

0

1

2

3

4

5

10 - RefrigerationCircuit

40 - Electrics 45 - Electronics 60 - Noise 50 - Mechanics 65 - Surfaces Device

Error Group

Freq

uenc

y

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Cum

ulat

ive

Per

cent

age

( % )Frequancy

Cumulative Percentage ( % )

Page 4: Kpi  Development Slide

Error Group vs Frequency for DISPLAY CHILLER ( 2008 )

25

5 4

1

71%

86%

97%100%

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

50 - Mechanics 40 - Electrics 60 - Noise 65 - Surfaces Device

Error Group

Freq

uenc

y

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Cum

ulat

ive

Perc

enta

ge (

% )

Frequency

Cumulative Percentage ( % )

Page 5: Kpi  Development Slide

Customer Complaints by YEAR 2008

13

38

7 75 5 4

100%95%

89%82%

73%65%

48%

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

50 - Mechanics 40 - Electrics 45 - Electronics 60 - Noise 05 -Refrigeration

Circuit

10 -Refrigeration

Circuit

65 - SurfacesDevice

Error Group

Freq

uanc

y

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Cum

ulat

ive

perc

enta

ge (

% )

Frequancy

Cumulative Percentage ( % )

Page 6: Kpi  Development Slide

Error Group vs Frequency for FREEZER ( 2009 )

3

1

75%

100%

0

1

2

3

4

05 - Refrigeration Circuit (Leakage) 50 - Mechanics

Error Group

Freq

uenc

y

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Cum

ulat

ive

P

erce

ntag

e ( %

)

Frequency

Cumulative Percentage

Page 7: Kpi  Development Slide
Page 8: Kpi  Development Slide

Error Group vs Frequency for DISPLAY CHILLER ( 2009 )

67%

0

1

2

3

40 - Electrics

Error Group

Freq

uenc

y

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Cum

ulat

ive

Per

cent

age

( % )

Frequency

Cumulative Percentage ( % )

Page 9: Kpi  Development Slide

Customer Complaints by YEAR 2009

36%

55%

73%

91%

100%

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

Error Group

Freq

uenc

y

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Cum

ulat

ive

perc

enta

ge (

% )

Frequency

Cumulative Percentage ( % )

Page 10: Kpi  Development Slide

PRODUCT QUALITY DEFECTS FREEZER 2008

2

40%

0

1

2

3

292-Material leaky

ERROR TYPE

FREQ

UEN

CY

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

CU

MU

LATI

VE P

ERC

ENTA

GE

(%)

FREQUENCY

CUMULATIVE PERCENTAGE ( % )

Page 11: Kpi  Development Slide

PRODUCT QUALITY DEFECTS WINE CHILLER 2008

2 2

100%

50%

0

1

2

3

2-Leaky 1-Soldering seam leaky

ERROR TYPE

FRE

QU

EN

CY

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

CU

MU

LATI

VE

PE

RC

EN

TAG

E

( %)

FREQUENCY

CUMULATIVE PERCENTAGE ( % )

Page 12: Kpi  Development Slide

PRODUCT QUALITY DEFECTS DISPLAY CHILLER 2008

18

4

1 1 1

88%92%

96% 100%

72%

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

61-Jammed 39-Regulation fault (toow arm/too cold)

33-Wrong display 66-Running noise 999-Type of error notclassif iable

ERROR TYPE

FRE

QU

EN

CY

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

CU

MU

LATI

VE

PE

RC

EN

TAG

E (%

)

FREQUENCY

CUMULATIVE PERCENTAGE ( % )

Page 13: Kpi  Development Slide

PRODUCT QUALITY DEFECTS FREEZER 2009

1 1

100%

50%

0

1

2

999-Type of error not classifiable 292-Material leaky

ERROR TYPE

FRE

QU

EN

CY

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

120%

CU

MU

LATI

VE

PE

RC

EN

TAG

E (

% )

FREQUENCY

CUMULATIVE PERCENTAGE ( % )

Page 14: Kpi  Development Slide

PRODUCT QUALITY DEFECTS WINE CHILLER 2009

2

100%

0

1

2

3

999-Type of error not classifiable

ERROR TYPE

FR

EQ

UE

NC

Y

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

CU

MU

LA

TIV

E P

ER

CE

NT

AG

E (

% )

FREQUENCY

CUMULATIVE PERCENTAGE ( % )

Page 15: Kpi  Development Slide

PRODUCT QUALITY DEFECTS DISPLAY CHILLER 2009

1 1

100%

50%

0

1

2

31-Outside tolerance (feelers, etc.) 34-Short circuit

ERROR TYPE

FR

EQ

UE

NC

Y

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

CU

MU

LA

TIV

E P

ER

CE

NT

AG

E (

% )

FREQUENCY

CUMULATIVE PERCENTAGE ( % )