“Kohlberg’s Ideas were a dominant force guiding moral development research for over forty...
-
Upload
brooke-mcbride -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of “Kohlberg’s Ideas were a dominant force guiding moral development research for over forty...
![Page 1: “Kohlberg’s Ideas were a dominant force guiding moral development research for over forty years” (Evans, Forney, Guido, Patton, & Renn, 2010). 1927-1987.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022072010/56649dd55503460f94acd4a1/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Kohlberg’s Theory of Moral Development
Chelsea Clark SAE 723
September 18, 2012
![Page 2: “Kohlberg’s Ideas were a dominant force guiding moral development research for over forty years” (Evans, Forney, Guido, Patton, & Renn, 2010). 1927-1987.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022072010/56649dd55503460f94acd4a1/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Lawrence Kohlberg
“Kohlberg’s Ideas were a dominant force guiding moral development research for over forty years”
(Evans, Forney, Guido, Patton, & Renn, 2010).
1927-1987
![Page 3: “Kohlberg’s Ideas were a dominant force guiding moral development research for over forty years” (Evans, Forney, Guido, Patton, & Renn, 2010). 1927-1987.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022072010/56649dd55503460f94acd4a1/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
History of Kohlberg’s Theory
Based on Paiget’s Model published in the 1920’s› Kohlberg’s early study of young males led
him to revise Paiget’s original three stages› Kohlberg created three more stages
Presented “dilemmas” and asked open ended questions to secure results of moral development
![Page 4: “Kohlberg’s Ideas were a dominant force guiding moral development research for over forty years” (Evans, Forney, Guido, Patton, & Renn, 2010). 1927-1987.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022072010/56649dd55503460f94acd4a1/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Prerequisites for Moral Development
General cognitive structures Social Perspective taking – being able
to put yourself in another's place
Both areas are necessary for moral development, but in no means are everything needed to foster moral
development
![Page 5: “Kohlberg’s Ideas were a dominant force guiding moral development research for over forty years” (Evans, Forney, Guido, Patton, & Renn, 2010). 1927-1987.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022072010/56649dd55503460f94acd4a1/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Conditions that Facilitate Moral Development
Exposure to high level cognitive thought› Exposure to thinking at any level higher
than what an individual portrays is sufficient to foster growth and development
Disequilibrium › Students faced with situations that cause
internal conflict in their moral reasoning structure
![Page 6: “Kohlberg’s Ideas were a dominant force guiding moral development research for over forty years” (Evans, Forney, Guido, Patton, & Renn, 2010). 1927-1987.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022072010/56649dd55503460f94acd4a1/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Preconventional Level Stage 1 – Heteronomous Mortality
› Obeying the rules to avoid punishment› Do not consider the rights or concerns of
others Stage 2 – Individualistic, Instrumental
Mortality› Follow the rules if it is in a persons best
interest – “What’s in it for me” mentality › Ensure satisfaction of a persons own needs
but also understand others have needs as well
![Page 7: “Kohlberg’s Ideas were a dominant force guiding moral development research for over forty years” (Evans, Forney, Guido, Patton, & Renn, 2010). 1927-1987.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022072010/56649dd55503460f94acd4a1/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Conventional Level Stage 3 – Interpersonally Normative
Morality› “Right” is defined by acceptable social roles
The expectations the people around you have Gaining others approval Shared feelings for the first time are more
important than individual feelings Stage 4 – Social System Mortality
› Also known as law and order› Being defined as following the rules set
forward by authority figures› Doing your duty as a citizen
![Page 8: “Kohlberg’s Ideas were a dominant force guiding moral development research for over forty years” (Evans, Forney, Guido, Patton, & Renn, 2010). 1927-1987.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022072010/56649dd55503460f94acd4a1/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Postconventional or Principled Level
Stage 5 – Human Rights and Social Welfare Mortality› Citizens recognize that rules set forward by
authority figures are merely a contract based on the majority
› People tend to disobey rules if they find them not in agreement with there personal beliefs
Stage 6 – Morality of Universalizable, Reversible and Prescriptive General Ethical Principles› Moral obligations made by a person’s conscience › Seeing all sides of an issue and being unbiased › Following universally ethical rules
Example – equality of human rights
![Page 9: “Kohlberg’s Ideas were a dominant force guiding moral development research for over forty years” (Evans, Forney, Guido, Patton, & Renn, 2010). 1927-1987.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022072010/56649dd55503460f94acd4a1/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Further Research
Cultural Difference › Middle/upper class versus rural/working
class› Western versus eastern philosophy
Religious Difference› Strong religious beliefs usually foster an
unwavering loyalty to a higher power which is consistent with conventional stages of moral development
![Page 10: “Kohlberg’s Ideas were a dominant force guiding moral development research for over forty years” (Evans, Forney, Guido, Patton, & Renn, 2010). 1927-1987.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022072010/56649dd55503460f94acd4a1/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Application of Development Theory
Providing students with opportunities to discuss hypothetical moral dilemmas in a classroom setting
Moral Judgment Interviews to gain knowledge of student’s development in academic programs
Programs that foster personal development and reflection
Supportive social network = growth in moral judgment
![Page 11: “Kohlberg’s Ideas were a dominant force guiding moral development research for over forty years” (Evans, Forney, Guido, Patton, & Renn, 2010). 1927-1987.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022072010/56649dd55503460f94acd4a1/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Criticisms of Kohlberg
Postconvential level of mortality – putting ones personal beliefs above law and society › Arguing the validity of Stage 6 – is it
possible? Sex – biased
› Carol Gilligan was the one to point this out
![Page 12: “Kohlberg’s Ideas were a dominant force guiding moral development research for over forty years” (Evans, Forney, Guido, Patton, & Renn, 2010). 1927-1987.](https://reader036.fdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022072010/56649dd55503460f94acd4a1/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
References
Cromag. (2012, March 25). Lawrence Kohlberg's Stages of Moral Development [Web Log Post]. Retrieved from http://activism101.ning.com/profiles/blogs/lawrence-kohlberg-s- stages-of-moral-development Evans, N.J., Forney, D.S., Guido, F.M., Patton, L.D., & Renn, K.A. (2010). Student development in college: Theory, research, and
practice (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Khouanphet, S. (2010, September 24). Kohlberg’s Theory of Moral Development [Web Log Post] Retrieved from
http://collegestudentdeveltheory.blogspot.com/2010/09/kohlbergs-theory-of-moral-development.html Long, R. Lawrence Kohlberg. Retrieved from http://relong.myweb.uga.edu W.C. Crain. (1985). Theories of Development. Prentice-Hall. pp. 118-136.