Knowledge Externalities in geographical clusters: An agent-based simulation study
description
Transcript of Knowledge Externalities in geographical clusters: An agent-based simulation study
11
Knowledge Externalities in Knowledge Externalities in geographical clusters: An geographical clusters: An agent-based simulation agent-based simulation
studystudy
Vito Albino, Vito Albino, Nunzia CarbonaraNunzia Carbonara, Ilaria Giannoccaro , Ilaria Giannoccaro Politecnico di BariPolitecnico di Bari
Bari, ItalyBari, Italy
EIASM Workshop on Complexity and ManagementOxford 19-20 June 2006
22
OutlineOutline Context & Theoretical BackgroundContext & Theoretical Background
Geographical clusters (GCs)Geographical clusters (GCs) Agglomeration external economiesAgglomeration external economies New source of GC competitive advantageNew source of GC competitive advantage
Paper’s objectivePaper’s objective Investigate the effects of knowledge externalities on GCsInvestigate the effects of knowledge externalities on GCs
Knowledge externalities & proximityKnowledge externalities & proximity MethodologyMethodology
Agent-based simulationAgent-based simulation The Agent-based modelThe Agent-based model Simulation Simulation Simulation Results Simulation Results ConclusionConclusion
33
Geographical clustersGeographical clusters
Geographical Clusters (GCs)Geographical Clusters (GCs) Geographically defined production systemsGeographically defined production systems
Large number of SMEsLarge number of SMEs
Labor divisionLabor division
SpecializationSpecialization
Dense network of inter-firm relationshipsDense network of inter-firm relationships
44
Geographical clustersGeographical clusters Literature on GCsLiterature on GCs
Different stream of studiesDifferent stream of studies• social sciences, economic geography, regional economics, political social sciences, economic geography, regional economics, political
economy, industrial organizationeconomy, industrial organization Research methodologiesResearch methodologies
• Case studiesCase studies• SurveysSurveys• Econometric analysisEconometric analysis
Theoretical frameworks used to study the reasons of the Theoretical frameworks used to study the reasons of the GC competitivenessGC competitiveness
• flexible specialization model (Piore and Sabel, 1984), localized flexible specialization model (Piore and Sabel, 1984), localized external economies (Marshall, 1920, Krugman, 1991), industrial external economies (Marshall, 1920, Krugman, 1991), industrial atmosphere (Marshall, 1919), innovative milieux (Maillat et al., atmosphere (Marshall, 1919), innovative milieux (Maillat et al., 1995)1995)
55
Agglomeration external economiesAgglomeration external economies Benefits that small firms can gain when they are
agglomerated in a given area and belong to the same productive sector.
Sources of agglomeration external economies (Marshall,1920):
• knowledge spill-over among competitors• specialized work forces with accumulation of technical
competencies in the area enabling process productivity• existence in the area of specialized input providers• pooling of common factors of production (land, labour,
capital, energy, transportation systems). Economic advantages
• reduction of production costs: due to the high level of labor division and by the specialization of work force
• reduction of transaction costs: due to the spatial and social proximity among firms
66
Source of GC competitive Source of GC competitive advantageadvantage
MAIN PROBLEMSMAIN PROBLEMS In a knowledge-based economy the source of competitive
advantage for firms is not more limited to a cost and differentiation advantages (static efficiency), but is linked to resources/competences that firms possess and their capabilities to create new knowledge (dynamic efficiency).
The long-term growth of organizations and thus of regions and nations depends on their ability to continually develop and produce innovative product and services.
77
Paper’s objectivePaper’s objective
Identify new sources of GC competitive advantagesIdentify new sources of GC competitive advantages
Investigate whether knowledge-based externalities Investigate whether knowledge-based externalities
can drive the geographical clustering of firmscan drive the geographical clustering of firms
88
New source of GC competitive New source of GC competitive advantageadvantage
Positive externalities knowledge-based: knowledge externalities
Sources of knowledge externalities:• learning processes activated within GCs (collective learning,
learning by interactions, learning by imitation)• Knowledge spill-over (intra-industry and inter-industry) –
involuntary knowledge flows• Organized (voluntary) knowledge flows • Easy circulation of information and tacit knowledge• Presence of specialized work forces
Benefits of knowledge externalities:• High innovative capacity of firms• Ability to answer to the market changes• High flexibility• Reduction of time-response to customer demand
99
Knowledge externalities & learning Knowledge externalities & learning processesprocesses
Learning by
imitationLearning by
interaction
Knowledge externalities
1010
Knowledge externalities & Knowledge externalities & proximityproximity
Geographical proximity
Cognitive proximity
Organizational proximity
Learning processes
Knowledge Externalities
1111
ProximityProximity
Geographical proximityGeographical proximity Spatial or physical distance between two firmsSpatial or physical distance between two firms
Cognitive proximityCognitive proximity Similarity of the knowledge stocks of two firmsSimilarity of the knowledge stocks of two firms
Organizational proximity Organizational proximity Extent to which relations are shared in an Extent to which relations are shared in an
inter-organizational and intra-organizational inter-organizational and intra-organizational arrangements.arrangements.
1212
ProximityProximity
Impact on learning processes:Impact on learning processes: To much proximity generate lock-in To much proximity generate lock-in To little proximity is not beneficialTo little proximity is not beneficial
1313
Research Methodology (1/2)Research Methodology (1/2) Agent-based simulation (ABS) Agent-based simulation (ABS)
Simulation methodology used to study complex Simulation methodology used to study complex
adaptive systemsadaptive systems
ABS analyzes the system behavior as the ABS analyzes the system behavior as the
spontaneously result of the local interactions among spontaneously result of the local interactions among
heterogeneous and independent components. heterogeneous and independent components.
ABS studies the system dynamics by adopting a ABS studies the system dynamics by adopting a
bottom-up approach rather than a top-down onebottom-up approach rather than a top-down one
1414
Research Methodology (2/2)Research Methodology (2/2)
Agent-based simulation (ABS) Agent-based simulation (ABS) ABS permits examination of the behavior of ‘ABS permits examination of the behavior of ‘real worldreal world’ systems ’ systems
by developing simplified analogous models of real systems. by developing simplified analogous models of real systems.
ABS can be used to explore the behavior of ‘ABS can be used to explore the behavior of ‘artificialartificial’ systems in ’ systems in
order to predict what might happen in the real world.order to predict what might happen in the real world.
ABS allows to study processes in ways nature prohibits, given ABS allows to study processes in ways nature prohibits, given
that it can be run many times with the values of the model that it can be run many times with the values of the model
parameters modified in each run and changes observed in parameters modified in each run and changes observed in
outputs. outputs.
1515
Agent Based SimulationAgent Based Simulation
Uses Uses Test-bed for new ideasTest-bed for new ideas Development of new theoriesDevelopment of new theories Decision-making aidsDecision-making aids What-ifWhat-if training tools training tools Hypotheses generatorsHypotheses generators
1616
ABS: Application to GCs (1/2)ABS: Application to GCs (1/2)
Boero and Squazzoni (2002) suggest an agent-based Boero and Squazzoni (2002) suggest an agent-based
computational approach to describe the adaptation of GCs to the computational approach to describe the adaptation of GCs to the
evolution of market and technology environmentsevolution of market and technology environments
Brenner (2001) develops a cellular automata model of the spatial Brenner (2001) develops a cellular automata model of the spatial
dynamics of entry, exit, and growth of firms within a regiondynamics of entry, exit, and growth of firms within a region
Zhang (2002) studies the formation of the high-tech industrial Zhang (2002) studies the formation of the high-tech industrial
clusters clusters
1717
ABS: Application to GCs (2/2)ABS: Application to GCs (2/2) Brusco et al. (2002) develop a 3-dimension cellular automation model of Brusco et al. (2002) develop a 3-dimension cellular automation model of
a GC, which represents how GC firms share information about a GC, which represents how GC firms share information about
technology, markets, and products. In the model, different scenarios technology, markets, and products. In the model, different scenarios
characterized by different degrees of information sharing among firms characterized by different degrees of information sharing among firms
are comparedare compared
Fioretti (2001) develops a spatial agent-based computational model to Fioretti (2001) develops a spatial agent-based computational model to
study the formation and the evolution of the Prato industrial district study the formation and the evolution of the Prato industrial district
Albino et al. (2006) propose a multi-agent system model to study Albino et al. (2006) propose a multi-agent system model to study
cooperation and competition in the supply chain of a GC. cooperation and competition in the supply chain of a GC.
1818
The agent-based model (1/2)The agent-based model (1/2) Agents are involved in location choices. Agents are involved in location choices. The location decision only depends on the incentives caused by The location decision only depends on the incentives caused by
agglomeration externality. agglomeration externality. Agglomeration economies are only based on Agglomeration economies are only based on knowledge knowledge
externalities. externalities. The benefits of The benefits of knowledge knowledge externalities consist in the development externalities consist in the development
of knowledge stock due to two learning processes, namely learning of knowledge stock due to two learning processes, namely learning by imitation and learning by interaction. by imitation and learning by interaction.
Learning processes are affected by three different dimensions of Learning processes are affected by three different dimensions of proximity, namely geographical, cognitive, and organizational proximity, namely geographical, cognitive, and organizational proximities. proximities.
The firm competitive success is directly proportional to the The firm competitive success is directly proportional to the knowledge stock developed by the firms. knowledge stock developed by the firms.
SoftwareSoftware NetLogoNetLogo
1919
The agent-based model (2/2)The agent-based model (2/2)
AgentsAgents Agents’ ActionsAgents’ Actions MeasuresMeasures Model’s DynamicsModel’s Dynamics
2020
AgentsAgents
Agents Agents firms firms
Agents’ attributesAgents’ attributes Position on the grid Position on the grid Pi,tPi,t ( (xx,,yy), ), Knowledge stock Knowledge stock Ki,t.Ki,t.
Agents’ goal Agents’ goal maximize the fitness maximize the fitness maximize the competitive maximize the competitive
advantage advantage maximize the knowledge stock maximize the knowledge stock
Agents’ mental model Agents’ mental model knowledge about the other agents knowledge about the other agents
Agents’ dynamic Agents’ dynamic movement into the grid looking for new position movement into the grid looking for new position
with higher fitnesswith higher fitness
2121
ActionsActions
LearningLearning Developing knowledge stockDeveloping knowledge stock Choosing the new positionChoosing the new position Moving in the selected positionMoving in the selected position
2222
Action: Learning (1/6)Action: Learning (1/6)
Learning by imitation Learning by imitation Kij,imitationKij,imitation Learning by interaction Learning by interaction Kij,interactionKij,interaction
The effectiveness of learning processes is The effectiveness of learning processes is influenced by geographical, cognitive, and influenced by geographical, cognitive, and
organizational proximity.organizational proximity.
2323
Action: Learning (2/6)Action: Learning (2/6)
imitation
ddd
K ijimitationij
max
maxgeo._prox.
eraction
ddd
K ijeractionij
int
max
maxint
geo._prox.
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
1,2
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
geographical distance
deve
lope
d kn
owle
dge
2424
Action: Learning (3/6)Action: Learning (3/6)
ijimitationij KKK prox.cognitive_ if ji KK
0prox.cognitive_ imitationijK if ji KK
jieractionij KKK prox.cognitive_int
020406080
100120140160180200
0 20 40 60 80 100
cognitive distance
deve
lope
d kn
owle
dge
learning byimitation/learningby interaction
2525
Action: Learning (4/6)Action: Learning (4/6)
ijonalorganizatieractionimitationij pK 1org._prox.
int/
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
1,2
0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1 1,2
organizational proximity
deve
lope
d kn
owle
dge
learning by imitation/byinteraction
2626
Action: Learning (5/6)Action: Learning (5/6)
ij
imitation
onalorganizatiij
j
iijtotalimitationij p
ddd
KK
KKK
1
max
max,
if ji KK
0,
totalimitationijK if ji KK
ij
eraction
onalorganizatiij
ijijtotaleractionij pd
ddacKKK
1
int
max
max,int
ji KK ,
2727
Action: Learning (6/6)Action: Learning (6/6)
0
0,2
0,4
0,6
0,8
1
1,2
1,4
0 20 40 60 80
distance
deve
lope
d kn
owle
dge
learning by imitation
learning by interaction
2828
Action: Action: Developing Developing knowledge stockknowledge stock
totalimitationijjij
totaleractionijii KKtKK,,int
max)()1t(
ij
totaleractionijK ,int
)(tK i the agent knowledge stock at step t
the incoming knowledge flow due to the interaction with the other agents
maximum value of knowledge that the agent can acquire through learning by imitation
Where:
totalimitationijj
K,
max
2929
Action: Action: Choosing the new Choosing the new positionposition
Agent computes the Agent computes the CAiCAi for every nine adjacent positions for every nine adjacent positions
Agent selects the new position that maximizes the development of Agent selects the new position that maximizes the development of CAiCAi
Pi,t
1 2 3
4
567
8
ij
totalimitationjitotalimitationijjij
totaleractioniji KKKCA,,,int
max)t(
3030
Action: Action: Moving in the selected Moving in the selected positionposition
Pi,t
1 2 3
4
567
8
3131
MeasuresMeasures
Emergence of spatial clustersEmergence of spatial clusters Number of clustersNumber of clusters
Description of spatial clustersDescription of spatial clusters the average knowledge stock of cluster the average knowledge stock of cluster
((KaverageKaverage);); the highest knowledge stock of cluster the highest knowledge stock of cluster
((KhighestKhighest);); the lowest knowledge stock of cluster (the lowest knowledge stock of cluster (KlowestKlowest););
3232
Model’s dynamicsModel’s dynamicsa)a) Compute for the agent Compute for the agent ii the value of the value of CAiCAi for all for all
possible new positions included the current one;possible new positions included the current one;b)b) Choose the position that maximizes Choose the position that maximizes CAiCAi;;c)c) Move agent Move agent ii into the new position; into the new position;d)d) Update the value of Update the value of KiKi;;e)e) Repeat actions (a) through (d) until all agents Repeat actions (a) through (d) until all agents
have gone through that process;have gone through that process;f)f) Repeat steps (a) through (d) for as many Repeat steps (a) through (d) for as many
simulated time steps as specified;simulated time steps as specified;g)g) Compute the measures. Compute the measures.
3333
Simulation (1/3)Simulation (1/3) The base-line model The base-line model
Number of agents N = 30Number of agents N = 30 Mean of the starting knowledge stock Mean of the starting knowledge stock KiKi,0,0 = 100= 100 Standard deviation of the starting knowledge stock Standard deviation of the starting knowledge stock St.dev St.dev Ki,0Ki,0 = 5= 5 Propensity to create new knowledge through learning by interaction equal Propensity to create new knowledge through learning by interaction equal
to the propensity to create new knowledge through learning by imitation to the propensity to create new knowledge through learning by imitation αα //γγ = 1= 1
Influence of the geographical proximity on the learning by imitation Influence of the geographical proximity on the learning by imitation βimitationβimitation = 2.5= 2.5
Influence of the geographical proximity on the learning by interaction Influence of the geographical proximity on the learning by interaction ββinteractioninteraction = 2= 2
Percentage of the inter-organizational agreements Percentage of the inter-organizational agreements OrgOrg.agreements.agreements = 50%= 50%
3434
Simulation (2/3)Simulation (2/3) Sensitivity analysis to evaluate the Sensitivity analysis to evaluate the
influence on the emerging clusters’ influence on the emerging clusters’ characteristics of:characteristics of: Number of agentsNumber of agents Distribution of the starting knowledge stockDistribution of the starting knowledge stock Learning process by imitation and by Learning process by imitation and by
interactioninteraction The geographical proximityThe geographical proximity The organizational proximityThe organizational proximity
3535
Simulation Simulation (3/3)(3/3)Simulation planSimulation plan
30
100
5
1
2,5
2
50%
Parameter EX1
N
Ki,0
St.dev Ki,0
α/ γ
βimitation
βinteraction
Org. agreements
EX2 EX3 EX4 EX5 EX6 EX7 EX8 EX9 EX10 EX11
20
100
5
1
2,5
2
50%
40
100
5
1
2,5
2
50%
30
100
2,5
1
2,5
2
50%
30
100
10
1
2,5
2
50%
30
100
5
0
2,5
2
50%
30
100
5
0,5
2,5
2
50%
30
100
5
2
2,5
2
50%
30
100
5
1
5
4
50%
30
100
5
1
2,5
2
0%
30
100
5
1
2,5
2
100%
Simulation time = 100 stepsNumber of replications = 20
3636
Simulation resultsSimulation results
1Outcome EX1Number of
cluster
Kaverage
-Mean
-Std
EX2 EX3 EX4 EX5 EX6 EX7 EX8 EX9 EX10 EX11
1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 11
114.8
2.4
108.6
2.1
126.0
5.2
107.2
0.8
128.8
8.0
99.8
0.4
105.6
1.1
162.7
16.7
112.6
1.8
108.0
1.9
120.0
2.5Khighest
-Mean
-Std
Klowest
-Mean
-Std
154.3
16.6
127.4
7.7
214.6
26.4
127.6
8.4
218.8
46.6
110.4
3.5
125.2
7.3
470.7
88.9
147.0
11.8
131.0
14.4
177.2
16.0
105.2
1.0
100.8
1.9
112.0
2.6
102.8
0.4
105.6
3.6
91.6
3.0
96.4
1.8
127.2
5.3
104.4
0.5
100.0
1.2
110.0
1.0
3737
Simulation results: discussionSimulation results: discussion
Knowledge externalities motivate firms to Knowledge externalities motivate firms to geographically clustergeographically cluster a geographical cluster of agents emerges in all the a geographical cluster of agents emerges in all the
experiments regardless in the experiment where the experiments regardless in the experiment where the firm’s propensity to create new knowledge through firm’s propensity to create new knowledge through learning by interaction is equal to zerolearning by interaction is equal to zero
A higher number of agents increases the A higher number of agents increases the average knowledge stock of the cluster average knowledge stock of the cluster
A greater cognitive heterogeneity of the GC A greater cognitive heterogeneity of the GC firms increases the average knowledge stock of firms increases the average knowledge stock of the cluster. the cluster.
3838
ConclusionsConclusions We have explored the concept of We have explored the concept of knowledge knowledge externalities externalities We have investigated whether the geographical We have investigated whether the geographical
clustering of firms can be driven by clustering of firms can be driven by knowledge knowledge externalities.externalities.
We have developed and Agent-based model to address We have developed and Agent-based model to address our research questionour research question
We have conducted We have conducted sensitivity analysis to test the modelsensitivity analysis to test the model Further research and research validation Further research and research validation
3939
Research validation (1/2)Research validation (1/2)
Comparison of ABS vs. other simulation Comparison of ABS vs. other simulation methodologiesmethodologies We have developed a Business Dynamics We have developed a Business Dynamics
model and we have conducted a model and we have conducted a Dynamic Dynamic Simulation Analysis (software: Vensim PLE)Simulation Analysis (software: Vensim PLE)
Results show that knowledge externalities Results show that knowledge externalities motivate firms to geographically clustermotivate firms to geographically cluster
4040
Research validation (2/2)Research validation (2/2) Empirical validationEmpirical validation
Analyzing the localization behaviors of firms (survey)Analyzing the localization behaviors of firms (survey)• Localization choice driven by static efficiencyLocalization choice driven by static efficiency• Localization choice driven by knowledge externalitiesLocalization choice driven by knowledge externalities
Measuring the level of attractiveness of different kinds Measuring the level of attractiveness of different kinds of geographical area (survey)of geographical area (survey)
• Geographical area with low level of knowledge externalities Geographical area with low level of knowledge externalities vs. Geographical area with high level of knowledge vs. Geographical area with high level of knowledge externalitiesexternalities
Comparing the performance of firms operating in Comparing the performance of firms operating in environments characterized by different levels of environments characterized by different levels of proximity (case study)proximity (case study)