KIN503 Lec9 - Factorial ANOVA
description
Transcript of KIN503 Lec9 - Factorial ANOVA
![Page 1: KIN503 Lec9 - Factorial ANOVA](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042616/55cf932b550346f57b9c58e4/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Factorial ANOVA
Lecture 9 Vincent Chap 11
![Page 2: KIN503 Lec9 - Factorial ANOVA](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042616/55cf932b550346f57b9c58e4/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Research Designs classification by the number of factors x levels
Factor x Level
Example
2 X 1 Change in BP before and after medication 2 Factors: 1) Drug-pre ; 2) Drug-post 1 Level: one group of people pre- and post- medication use
3 X 1 Comparison of 6mo weight loss with 3 different diets. 3 Factors: 1) diet A, 2) diet B, 3) diet C 1 Level: 3 groups of people drawn from the same population
2 X 2 Effect of a performance supplement and gender on strength training 2 Factor: 1) Strength-w/ supplement; 2) Strength-w/o supplement 2 Levels: 1) Males, 2) Females
3 X 2 Effect of training intensity on 100m run time in males and females 3 Factors: 1) low-intensity, 2) medium-intensity, 3) high-intensity 2 Levels: 1) Males, 2) Females
![Page 3: KIN503 Lec9 - Factorial ANOVA](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042616/55cf932b550346f57b9c58e4/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Research Designs cont.
AKA Description Example Between-between 2 (or more) between
subject factors Weight lost in one group of individuals after diet A versus another group on diet B.
Within-within 2 (or more) within subject factors
Weight lost in individuals before and after a diet
Between-within 1 (or more) between and 1 (or more) within subject factor
Weight lost in males and females before and after a diet
![Page 4: KIN503 Lec9 - Factorial ANOVA](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042616/55cf932b550346f57b9c58e4/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Interaction • Interaction is the combined effects of the factors on
the dependent variable.
• Two factors interact when the differences between the means on one factor depend upon the level of the other factor.
• Example: – If training programs affect men and women differently
then training programs interact with gender. – If training programs affect men and women the same they
do not interact. *** See example 1 in spreadsheet
![Page 5: KIN503 Lec9 - Factorial ANOVA](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042616/55cf932b550346f57b9c58e4/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Visual Assessment
• Is there an effect of factor A?
• Is there an effect of factor B?
• Is there an interaction effect?
![Page 6: KIN503 Lec9 - Factorial ANOVA](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042616/55cf932b550346f57b9c58e4/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
![Page 7: KIN503 Lec9 - Factorial ANOVA](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042616/55cf932b550346f57b9c58e4/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Examples from Literature
![Page 8: KIN503 Lec9 - Factorial ANOVA](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042616/55cf932b550346f57b9c58e4/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
No Interactions (Parallel Slopes)
The red lines represent the average scores for BOTH A1 & A2 at each level of B.
The red lines are graphing B Main Effects.
![Page 9: KIN503 Lec9 - Factorial ANOVA](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042616/55cf932b550346f57b9c58e4/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
No Interaction
Red line is the Average A1 mean (averaged across all levels of B).
Blue line is the average A2 mean.
Main effect for A compares the red and blue mean values.
![Page 10: KIN503 Lec9 - Factorial ANOVA](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042616/55cf932b550346f57b9c58e4/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Significant Interaction
Groups A1 and A2 are NOT EQUALLY affected by the levels of B.
![Page 11: KIN503 Lec9 - Factorial ANOVA](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042616/55cf932b550346f57b9c58e4/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Significant Interaction
Groups A1 and A2 are NOT EQUALLY affected by the levels of B.
![Page 12: KIN503 Lec9 - Factorial ANOVA](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042616/55cf932b550346f57b9c58e4/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Strong Interaction
Groups A1 and A2 are NOT EQUALLY affected by the levels of B.
A1 goes DOWN
A2 goes UP
Draw in the means for A1 and A2?
Draw in means for B1, B2, B3.
![Page 13: KIN503 Lec9 - Factorial ANOVA](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042616/55cf932b550346f57b9c58e4/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Significant Interaction
Groups A1 and A2 are NOT EQUALLY affected by the levels of B. Draw in the means for A1 and A2. Draw in means for B1, B2, B3.
![Page 14: KIN503 Lec9 - Factorial ANOVA](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042616/55cf932b550346f57b9c58e4/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Factorial ANOVA Assumptions • Between-Between designs have the same assumptions as one-way
ANOVA.
– Dependent Variable is interval or ratio.
– The variables are normally distributed
– The groups have equal variances (for between-subjects factors)
– The groups are randomly assigned.
• Between-Within are similar to Repeated measures ANOVA (in chapter 10), but now sphericity must be applied to the pooled data (across groups) and the individual group, this is referred to as multisample sphericity or circularity.
– Sphericity: requires equal differences between within subjects means. In other words the changes between each time point must be equal.
– We will not cover this in today’s lecture.
![Page 15: KIN503 Lec9 - Factorial ANOVA](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042616/55cf932b550346f57b9c58e4/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Example: A 3x2 Between-between Factorial ANOVA
• Research Question: What are the effects of practice (1, 3, 5 days/wk) and experience (athlete, non-athlete) on throwing accuracy?
• Experimental Design: 18 subjects (n = 9 athletes, and n = 9 non-athletes) were randomly assigned to 1 of three the practice groups (1, 3, 5 days/wk).
• Statistical Approach: A 3 x 2 Factorial ANOVA with two between subjects factors practice (1, 3, 5 days/wk) and experience (athlete, non-athlete) will be used to test the effects of practice and experience on throwing accuracy.
** spreadsheet example 2 for data and statistical analysis
![Page 16: KIN503 Lec9 - Factorial ANOVA](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042616/55cf932b550346f57b9c58e4/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
B1 B2 B3
Thro
win
g Acc
urac
y
Practice Schedule
Effect of experience and practice on throwing accuracy
A1
A2
![Page 17: KIN503 Lec9 - Factorial ANOVA](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042616/55cf932b550346f57b9c58e4/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Main Effects Testing:
FA: Main effect of Experience F(df = 1,12) = 8.52, p = .013
FB: Main effect of Practice F(df = 2,12) = 29.35, p = .000
FAB: Interaction F(df = 2,12) = 3.44, p = .066 is N.S. α = 0.05, however, the book calls this significant for illustration of post hoc testing.
![Page 18: KIN503 Lec9 - Factorial ANOVA](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042616/55cf932b550346f57b9c58e4/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
The Interaction term
1. If the interaction is NOT SIGNIFICANT, analysis stops after the assessment of the main effects
2. If the interaction IS SIGNIFICANT, you can also do
simple effects testing. Using simple ANOVA, you can:
1. Simple Effects (A) 1. F across A at B1 = 0.5, N.S. 2. F across A at B2 = 2.4, N.S 3. F across A at B3 = 13.47, p = 0.022
2. Simple Effects (B)
1. F across B at A1 = 18.81, p = 0.03, HSD* = 3.34, p < 0.05; 4.87, p < 0.01 2. F across B at A2 = 10.86, p = 0.01, HSD* = 2.21, p < 0.05; 3.22, p < 0.01
![Page 19: KIN503 Lec9 - Factorial ANOVA](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042616/55cf932b550346f57b9c58e4/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
EXAMPLE in SPSS See example in Excel worksheet. Input data on Monthly Income
• Note that the categorical variables are represented by numeric values instead of strings. These values can be labeled in Variable View.
• Analysis > General Linear Model > Univariate
Subject Gender Jobcat Monthly 1 1 1 1900 2 2 1 1800 3 1 1 3199 4 2 1 1998 5 1 1 2180 6 2 1 1829 7 1 1 3299 8 2 1 2879 9 1 2 4500
10 2 2 3720 11 1 2 4211
![Page 20: KIN503 Lec9 - Factorial ANOVA](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042616/55cf932b550346f57b9c58e4/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
• In the pop-up menu, move “monthly” to the dependent variable box and “gender” and “jobcat” to the Fixed Factors box.
• Click Plot to include a graph in the output
![Page 21: KIN503 Lec9 - Factorial ANOVA](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042616/55cf932b550346f57b9c58e4/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
• Click Options to enable post-hoc analysis of main effects • Check “Compare main effects” then move the factors and
factor interaction to the box to Display Means.
• Check Descriptive Statistics, Estimates of Effect Size, and Homogeneity test to include in output.
• Click Continue and then OK to generate output.
![Page 22: KIN503 Lec9 - Factorial ANOVA](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042616/55cf932b550346f57b9c58e4/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Plot and Descriptive Stats
![Page 23: KIN503 Lec9 - Factorial ANOVA](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042616/55cf932b550346f57b9c58e4/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Output of Omnibus Test
• Significance values indicate that there is a significant main effect in job category, but not in gender nor in the interaction between job category and gender.
![Page 24: KIN503 Lec9 - Factorial ANOVA](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042616/55cf932b550346f57b9c58e4/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Main Effect: Job Category
There is a significant difference in monthly incomes of all paired comparisons
![Page 25: KIN503 Lec9 - Factorial ANOVA](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042616/55cf932b550346f57b9c58e4/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Main Effect: Gender
This was already deemed insignificant in the omnibus test, but we will look at it just for practice.
![Page 26: KIN503 Lec9 - Factorial ANOVA](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042616/55cf932b550346f57b9c58e4/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
The example does not justify post-hoc analysis of the interaction effect, however in the case that it is needed, a pairwise comparison of the interaction effect can be enabled. HOW TO: • Adjust the syntax to enable pairwise
comparison of the interaction effect • Select Paste to view the syntax editor
In the syntax editor, change the interaction line (Line 9): /EMMEANS=TABLES(gender*jobcat) should be /EMMEANS=TABLES(gender*jobcat) COMPARE(gender) Click the green triangle to update the output.
![Page 27: KIN503 Lec9 - Factorial ANOVA](https://reader034.fdocuments.us/reader034/viewer/2022042616/55cf932b550346f57b9c58e4/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Post-hoc analysis of Interaction Effect