Kim Kyllesbach Larsen- T-Mobile- LTE Deployment

18
1 Examine the economics of rolling-out LTE LTE World Summit 2010, Tuesday May 18th, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Dr. Kim (Kyllesbech Larsen) International Network Economics, Technology, T-Mobile

Transcript of Kim Kyllesbach Larsen- T-Mobile- LTE Deployment

Page 1: Kim Kyllesbach Larsen- T-Mobile- LTE Deployment

1

Examine the economics of rolling-out LTELTE World Summit 2010, Tuesday May 18th, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Dr. Kim (Kyllesbech Larsen)International Network Economics,Technology, T-Mobile

Page 2: Kim Kyllesbach Larsen- T-Mobile- LTE Deployment

Story…..

Kim Kyllesbech Larsen, Technology – T-Mobile, 18 May 2010 2

Page 3: Kim Kyllesbach Larsen- T-Mobile- LTE Deployment

Kim Kyllesbech Larsen, Technology – T-Mobile, 18 May 2010 3

Page 4: Kim Kyllesbach Larsen- T-Mobile- LTE Deployment

The 3G traffic jam!

3G capacity crunch.

Re-farming existing spectrum.

New spectrum demand.

Empty 2G roads - in time?

The incumbent mobile operator’s near-future … “it aint pretty”!

Re-farming GSM!

Kim Kyllesbech Larsen, Technology – T-Mobile, 18 May 2010 4

1 MHz in LTE ≈ 5 MHz in 3G.

Too little too late?

Page 5: Kim Kyllesbach Larsen- T-Mobile- LTE Deployment

The Greenfield … “happy” short-term, a tougher future.

Fixed-like demand!

Dramatic Hz / customer drop!

Limited free cash for growth?

Tougher future … growth limitations.

Kim Kyllesbech Larsen, Technology – T-Mobile, 18 May 2010 5

Lots of Hz per customer!

Higher speed than HSPA+?

ROI optimized?

Happy startup … plenty of quality.

Page 6: Kim Kyllesbach Larsen- T-Mobile- LTE Deployment

The mobile broadband traffic jam … Turnaround?… avoiding customer dissatisfaction …

Kim Kyllesbech Larsen, Technology – T-Mobile, 18 May 2010 6

Page 7: Kim Kyllesbach Larsen- T-Mobile- LTE Deployment

Telco Europe is all about efficiency … … avoiding shareholder unhappiness …

Growth markets

EBITDA GROWTH

OPEX GROWTH

REVENUE GROWTH

Kim Kyllesbech Larsen, Technology – T-Mobile, 18 May 2010 7

2010 – 2014 ILLUSTRATION

Western EuropeOPEX GROWTH

REVENUE PRESSURE

Page 8: Kim Kyllesbach Larsen- T-Mobile- LTE Deployment

The Netherlands 2014 …broadband everywhere, for everyone.

Every house-hold has at least 2 PCs.

PopulationEvery house-hold has (fixed) broadband.

MobileBroadband

PCs2

01

6

Kim Kyllesbech Larsen, Technology – T-Mobile, 18 May 2010 8

Population

16.7mn

House-holds

7mn

Fixedbroadband

6 out of 10 people will have mobile broadband.

Every house-hold has (fixed) broadband.

Page 9: Kim Kyllesbach Larsen- T-Mobile- LTE Deployment

The Dutch 2.6 GHz auction …is c$ 0.15 / MHz / pop cheap?

€2.6mn for 130 MHz FDD.

“cabled” entrants with wireless ambition.

Kim Kyllesbech Larsen, Technology – T-Mobile, 18 May 2010 9

“cabled” entrants with wireless ambition.

Is there (economically) room for 2 more?

Page 10: Kim Kyllesbach Larsen- T-Mobile- LTE Deployment

2.6GHz mobile coverage range is poor … the business model could mitigate this … “forced” focus on wireless DSL?

distance

DL power

3 dB

2.6 GHz 1800 MHz 850 MHz

10 dB

Digital dividend

Kim Kyllesbech Larsen, Technology – T-Mobile, 18 May 2010 10

Propagation Loss + Link Budget +

In-Building Penetration Loss =

- 3 dB 0 dB up-to: - 2 dB

- 5 dB

2.6 GHz needs 2×××× more sites to match 1800 MHz mobile coverage.

Page 11: Kim Kyllesbach Larsen- T-Mobile- LTE Deployment

Greenfield minimum requirements by 2012 … 80 km2.

75 – 125 LTE nodes.

max. 460,000 (3%) pop.

Greenfield operator

Cash required ca. €150 mn.

Kim Kyllesbech Larsen, Technology – T-Mobile, 18 May 2010 11

1 mn (4%) LTE devices.

$3.3 bn mobile data top-line.

Market projections

Note: there are many ways to deploy the Greenfield network and ultimately will depend on the chosen business model.

Illustration

100% coverageNo (0%) coverage

Page 12: Kim Kyllesbach Larsen- T-Mobile- LTE Deployment

Greenfield minimum requirements by 2016 … 800 km2.

750 – 1,250 LTE nodes.

Ca. 2.3 (14%) mn pop.

Greenfield operator

Cash required ca. €400 mn.

Kim Kyllesbech Larsen, Technology – T-Mobile, 18 May 2010 12

5 mn (20%) LTE devices.

$4.5 bn mobile data top-line.

Market projections

Note: there are many ways to deploy the Greenfield network and ultimately will depend on the chosen business model.

Illustration

100% coverageNo (0%) coverage

Page 13: Kim Kyllesbach Larsen- T-Mobile- LTE Deployment

Partnership with an incumbent operator will provide the Greenfield much better economics and market timing.

BTS / NODE-B

BSS

GreenfieldCore

Site(acq. + build)

Radio(electronics)

Backhaul(transport)

Backbone(transport)

Core BSS

Incumbent

Kim Kyllesbech Larsen, Technology – T-Mobile, 18 May 2010 13

NODE-B

eNodeB

BSS

Capex prevention

50%-70% min 35% up-to 50% up-to 50%Partly

possibleLess likely

Opex prevention

min. 35% ca. 35%scale

discountscale

discountPartly

possibleLess likely

IncumbentCore

Page 14: Kim Kyllesbach Larsen- T-Mobile- LTE Deployment

Is the service worth paying for ? …(it is in fixed broadband!)…

×1↑×1/3

×20↑

In relative usage

×70↑+

×100↑+

Kim Kyllesbech Larsen, Technology – T-Mobile, 18 May 2010 14

Mobile broadband850 MHz – 2.1 GHz

BWA2.3 – 2.5+

GHz

FixedwithWiFi

Mobile industry: hardly any QoS pricing mainly based on volumetric FUP.

Wireless & Fixed Broadband business model uses QoS-based pricing.

Page 15: Kim Kyllesbach Larsen- T-Mobile- LTE Deployment

Always best connected with QoS-based pricing.

HIGH QoS REQUIREMENTAND HIGH VOLUME

MEDIUM QoS REQUIREMENT

Bandwidte.g.<14 MbpsEtc…e.g. < 2 Mbps

BEST EFFORT

Illustration

$$

$

$

Kim Kyllesbech Larsen, Technology – T-Mobile, 18 May 2010 15

Mobile, Nomadic & In-door broadband850 MHz – 2.5+ GHz with Cable/DSL

Bandwidth

e.g.<14 MbpsEtc…e.g. < 2 Mbps

Page 16: Kim Kyllesbach Larsen- T-Mobile- LTE Deployment

2.5 GHz Greenfield LTE deployment appears un-economical.

Partnership model (e.g., network sharing) is essential.

Why should we care?

Kim Kyllesbech Larsen, Technology – T-Mobile, 18 May 2010 16

Partnership model (e.g., network sharing) is essential.

Managing broadband demand is a critical success factor.

Page 17: Kim Kyllesbach Larsen- T-Mobile- LTE Deployment

“Cabled” 2.6 GHz Greenfield – does it make sense?

Weakness.Strength.

� Existing fixed broadband customer base.

� Leverage on own backhaul & backbone.

� One single (mobile) technology to optimize.

� Almost all house-holds have fixed broadband.

� Negative 10 year standalone NPV.

� 2.6 GHz is coverage in-efficient .

Kim Kyllesbech Larsen, Technology – T-Mobile, 18 May 2010 17

Threats.Opportunities.

� Mobile competition better spectrum position.

� Growth limitation due fixed-like demand.

� Lack of mobile broadband scale.

� Fixed-like strategy mitigate poor propagation.

� Network sharing on 1800 MHz best-fit grid.

� Partnership reducing total cost pressure.

Page 18: Kim Kyllesbach Larsen- T-Mobile- LTE Deployment

18

Contact:

[email protected]: +31 6 2409 5202http://nl.linkedin.com/in/kimklarsen

Thank you very much!Acknowledgement: Denis Gautheret and many other very talented colleagues in T-Mobile & DTAG. Furthermore, many thanks to Michael Lai, CEO P1 Malaysia, for allowing re-use of their great ad campaign of „cut the wires“.