Kick-Off Meeting - WP7
-
Upload
slope-project -
Category
Education
-
view
193 -
download
0
Transcript of Kick-Off Meeting - WP7
Project SLOPE1
WP 7 – Piloting the SLOPE demonstrator
Objectives
2
Demonstration of supply chains, implemented models and IT‐systems
Field demonstrations
Trade fairs
Stakeholder involvement
Training on the job
Tasks
3
T.7.1 Definition of evaluation methodology BOKU
T.7.2 Preparation of demonstrators ITENE
T.7.3 Trials and validation cycle BOKU
T.7.4 Training on the job CNR
Timeline
2014 2015 2016J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D
T.7.1 D
T.7.2 D
T.7.3 M D M M
T.7.4
+5D
Duration: 24 months, workload: 83.5 months
Task leader: BOKU, participants: all
4
WP7: Piloting the SLOPE demonstrator
8‐9/jan/2014Kick‐off Meeting
Task 7.1 – Definition of evaluation methodology
Kühmaier M, Stampfer KInstitute of Forest Engineering, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna
Activities and partners
6
Development of principles and guidelines for the evaluation of two mountainous forest supply chains (Whole tree, Cut‐to‐length) BOKU, CNR
Harvesting, chipping, transport, storage, quality management BOKU, CNR, KESLA, GRE, ITENE
Process flow diagrams BOKU
Work studies and performance rating BOKU, CNR, MHG
Multicriteria evaluation BOKU
Timeline and participants
D7.01 Protocol for the definition of evaluation methodology BOKU
Duration: 3 months, workload: 10.5 months
Task leader: BOKU (4.5)
Participants: CNR (1), KESLA (1.5), MHG (2),GREIFENBERG (0.5), ITENE (1)
7
2014 2015 2016J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D
Start: January 2015 End: March 2015
Dependencies between activities
T.7.1
WP2 Forestinformationcollection
T.7.2Preparation of demonstrators
WP3Harvesting
systems
WP4 Quality control
T.7.3 Trials and validation cycle
8
Risks
9
Focusing on a limited number of supply chain processes (bottlenecks)
Choosing a comprehensible, scientific but not to complicated evaluation methodology
Combining different evaluation approaches
Degree of automation Manual vs automatic recording
Guidelines for work studies
Magagnotti & Spinelli (2012)
10
Process flow diagram
K. Stampfer (2013)
Proc
essi
ngof
Mat
eria
l
11
Definition of work cycles
T. Palander (2013)
12
Process data models
Kariniemi and Vartiamäki (2010)
13
Multicriteria evaluation
Ecology
Impacts on SoilBearing pressure in kPa
Global Warming PotentialFuel consumption in kg CO2
equivalent
Stand damageDamage on remaining stand
in %
Economy
Value addedValue added in €
Relocation timeAggregation of harvesting
areas in %
Social
EmploymentDemand in Work Force in h
Working safetyInjury quota in n/1 Mio. m3
14
M. Kühmaier (2010)
Chain saw – hand Chain saw – forwarderChain saw – cable forwarder Chain saw – cable yarderHarvester – forwarderTracked harvester – cable yarder Tracked harvester – cable forwarderChain saw – skidderChain saw ‐ helicopter ‐ processor Chain saw ‐ cable yarder ‐ processor
M. Kühmaier (2010)
Multicriteria evaluation
Project SLOPE16
T 7.2 – Preparation of demonstrators
Trento, January 08th, 2014
Index17
1. Scope
2. Proposed Workplan
3. Time Schedule
4. Contact info
1. Scope18
This task aims to: Develop the experimental design of pilot tests. Define data to be gathered and sample size Ensure quality of field studies
To be developed from M16 to M19
Includes development of “D7.02 Protocol for the experimental design of demonstration activities” Due to month 19
Partners involved: all ITENE (leader), GRAPHITECH, CNR, KESLA, COAST, MHG, BOKU,
FLY, GRE, TRE
1. Scope19
Pilot in three different countries Italy ‐> CNR Austria ‐> BOKU Norway ‐> CNR and BOKU
2. Proposed Workplan20
1. Define variables to be gathered Contact with related partners
2. Design pilot tests Accordingly to project requirements and technology
capacities 1 design for location
3. Assign responsibilities
4. Develop guidelines
3. Time Schedule21
4. Contact info22
Juan de Dios Díaz [email protected]
Emilio Gonzalez [email protected]
Patricia Bellver [email protected]
WP7: Piloting the SLOPE demonstrator
Kick‐off Meeting8‐9/jan/2014
Task 7.3 – Trials and validation cycle
Kühmaier M, Stampfer KInstitute of Forest Engineering, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna
Trials
SLOPE framework will be applied, tested andvalidated in at least two sites representing twooperative scenarios in three countries CNR, BOKU, KESLA,GRE, MHG, ITENE
Whole tree system on a fertile stand
Cut‐to‐length system on a less fertile stand
Austria, Italy and Norway
Support of Skogolandskap
Evaluating the performance before and afterimplementing SLOPE framework
2
Evaluation of data collectionmethods
Data collection viaremote sensing
and multispectralanalysis
UAV dataacquisition and
processing
Terrestrial laserscanning
Requirements Applicability Accuracy Additional effort Efficiency and economic improvements
Investigated processes
Treemarking via
RFID tags
Tree fellingby chainsaw
Extractingby cableyarder
ProcessingTimber
transport
Tree/Log/Biomass grading
Data collection
27
Terrain and stand characteristics Machine technology Time consumption Fuel consumption Product output Energy output Damage caused to trees and soil Log length and diameter measurement accuracy Operator experience, skills and motivation
Validation cycle (I)
28
Forest information system (FIS) Performance of timber supply systems CNR,
BOKU, GRAPHITECH, COAST, MHG, TRE
Comparison of FIS estimations and fieldmeasurements GRAPHITECH, COAST, MHG, TRE
Comparison with currently available ERPsystems MHG, ITENE
Validation cycle (II)
29
Human Machine Interaction KESLA, GRE
Quality control system CNR, BOKU
Accuracy of different data collection methodsunder different conditions COAST, CNR, TRE
RFID tag reading system and survival rate CNR,ITENE
Timeline and participants
Duration: 14 months, workload: 29 months
Task leader: BOKU (4)
Participants: GRAPHITECH (3), CNR (3), KESLA(3.5), COASTWAY (2), MHG (3.5), GREIFENBERG(3.5), TRE (3.5), ITENE (3)
D7.032 Demo reportfor data collection IIBOKU
D7.04 Demo reportfor quality controlBOKU, CNR
D7.05 Demo reportfor timber supplyperformance & ERPMHG
30
2014 2015 2016J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D
D7.031 Demo report for data collection IBOKU
Dependencies between activities
T.7.3T.7.4 Trainingon the job
WP6 SystemIntegration
WP3Harvesting
systems
T.7.1Definition ofevaluation
methodologyWP2
Informationcollection
WP4 Qualityassessment
T.7.2Preparation ofdemonstrators
31
Risks
32
Completion of prototypes in a timely manner
Coordination of field measurements Hosting company, machine transfer, workforce,
weather conditions
Missing industrial partner in Austria
Measuring the data with standardized methods
Degree of automatization
Austrian case studies
0,77
2,05 2,09
5,55
2,05
5,43
1,06
2,80
0,00
1,00
2,00
3,00
4,00
5,00
6,00
Diesel [Liter/km] CO2 [kg/km] Diesel [Liter/m³] CO2 [kg/m³]
Tour saw mill Tour interim storage F. Holzleitner (2013)
Timber supply ‐ Diesel consumption
Examples of field trails
Input for further analysis such as optimizationmodels and vehicle routing algorithms
Attribute Figure
Chipper‐productivity 12.8 odt/hour
Average load 13.8 odt
Distance chipping site ‐ plant 54 km /1.4hours
Fuel consumption of truck 49.7 liters/100km
Fuel consumption of chipper 40.5 liters/hour
Annual utilization of chipper 1,990 hours
Transport productivity
F. Holzleitner (2013)
Implementation in GIS Time consumption/process
Driving time
Functional road class(FRC)/Route
Share of forest roads
Average speed/FRC
GIS‐based cost estimating
F. Holzleitner (2013)Decision support tool ‐ “Least Cost Surfaces” [€/m³]
Task 7.4 – Training on the job
Kick‐off Meeting 8‐9/jan/2014
Acceptance of operators
Crucial for project’s “afterlife” and commercial success of the system