Key Note - SEPG 2013 - Kanban and the End of Methodology
-
Upload
david-anderson -
Category
Business
-
view
498 -
download
1
description
Transcript of Key Note - SEPG 2013 - Kanban and the End of Methodology
[email protected] @lkuceo
Presenter:David J. Anderson
SEPG North AmericaPittsburgh
October 2013Release 1.0
Lessons we can learn from Bruce Lee’s journey in martial arts
Kanbanand the End of Methodology
[email protected] @lkuceo
The End of Methodology
[email protected] @lkuceo
Is Kanban heralding in a new era?
* http://alistair.cockburn.us/The+end+of+methodology** Cockburn’s suggested name for this new class of methods
It’s the end of methodology!*
Reflective Improvement Frameworks** are the
future!
Alistair Cockburn
Kanban is such a Reflective Improvement Framework
[email protected] @lkuceo
A methodology defines behavior
• A software engineering methodology is a description of techniques– what to do– how to do it– When to do it - sequences or workflows– Who does what - definition of roles and
responsibilities• Ideally, a methodology should tell us why and
give us a context to define its appropriateness
[email protected] @lkuceo
Many styles of software engineering emerged over several decades
• Some just personal preferences in style (e.g. PSP versus XP), but others for specific contexts or risk profiles (e.g. the many risk profiles captured in a 2-dimensional grid in Cockburn's Crystal methods).
• Some styles came in schools or movements - such as the Agile movement
• While others came as large frameworks such as Rational Unified Process designed to be tailored to a context*
*CMMI ML3 includes specific practices for process definition & tailoring
[email protected] @lkuceo
The Kanban Method was born out of frustration with these many styles
In 2002, I was questioning whether the specific methodology really
made that much differenceThe question wasn't whether a methodology worked or
not, or whether appropriateness of context had been assessed correctly or not, the problem was organizations were being seduced into pursuing changes that were too large and too ambitious. These change initiatives were beyond their capability and maturity to manage them
[email protected] @lkuceo
CMMI has a bl nd sp t!
• While CMMI is all about improvement - there is no process area(s) for change management
• IMO a flaw in the model that inhibits success
[email protected] @lkuceo
Change to mature or mature to change?
It's chicken and egg - a causality dilemma!
In order to improve capability and maturity, you have to be able to manage change. In order to manage change, you have to first improve capability and maturity
[email protected] @lkuceo
Managing change has greater leverage than picking the right methodology
Instead the bigger challenge with the greater leverage on outcome was learning to manage
change in the organization
I came to the conclusion (circa 2002) that the important issue in creative knowledge work wasn't the selection of the right methodology
[email protected] @lkuceo
Traditional Change is an A to B process
• A is where you are now. B is a destination.– B is either defined (from a methodology definition)– or designed (by tailoring a framework)
• To get from A to B, a change agency* will guide a transition initiative to install destination B into the organization
*either an internal SEPG or external consultants
CurrentProcess Future
Process
Defined
Designed
transition
[email protected] @lkuceo
Change initiatives fail (even) more often than projects
Change initiatives often fail (aborted) or produce lack luster results
They fail to institutionalize resulting in regression back to old behavior (and lower maturity levels)
[email protected] @lkuceo
How we process change…
Daniel Kahneman
Silicon-basedlife form
Carbon-basedlife form
I logically evaluate change using System 2
I feel change emotionally using System 1
[email protected] @lkuceo
Methodologies challenge people psychology & sociologically
• New roles (defined in a methodology) attack their identity• New responsibilities using new techniques & practices
threaten their self-esteem and put their social status at risk
• Most people resist most change because individually they have more to lose than to gain
• It is safer to be conservative and stick to current practices and avoid shaking up the current social hierarchy
• Only the brave, the reckless or the desperate will pursue grand changes
[email protected] @lkuceo
The Kanban Method…• Rejects the traditional
approach to change • Believes, it is better to avoid
resistance than to push harder against it – Don’t install a new methodology
• Is designed for carbon-based life forms - Evolutionary change that is humane
[email protected] @lkuceo
The Kanban Method…• Catalyzes improvement
through use of kanban systems and visual boards*
• Takes its name from the use of kanban but it is just a name
• Anyone who thinks Kanban is just about kanban (boards & systems) is truly mistaken
*also known as "kanban" in Chinese and in Japanese when written with Chinese characters
[email protected] @lkuceo
The Kanban Method is a new approach to improvement
Kanban is a
method
without methodology
[email protected] @lkuceo
Bruce Lee’s Journey in Martial Arts
[email protected] @lkuceo
Bruce Lee rejected traditional teaching and styles of Chinese martial arts
• There are some parallels in the story of Bruce Lee and the emergence of his approach to Kung Fu
• Lee rejected the idea of following a particular style of Chinese Martial Arts
[email protected] @lkuceo
Python
Monkey
Mantis
Tiger
Kung Fu Panda simplified the art to only four styles
[email protected] @lkuceo
There are in fact very many styles…
[email protected] @lkuceo
“Dry land swimming” provides a false sense of capability
• The only way to learn is to train with a live opponent
• Lee rejected the many styles of martial arts for various reasons, mainly that they gave the practitioners a false sense of capability, putting them at risk in real combat situations
• He was against Kata (learning patterns without an opponent) and described them in derogatory terms such as "dry land swimming.“
[email protected] @lkuceo
Lee wanted to start from first principles and core concepts
Four ranges of combat• Kicking• Punching• Trapping• Grappling
*Apparently still called the Five Ways, there are actually now six **with the later inclusion of SAA**The fact that The Five Ways has six elements is evidence of evolution in action***Incorporated core ideas such as "center line" and single fluid motion from Wing Chun and parrying from Epee Fencing********Not a Chinese Martial Art and hence evidence of "no limitation as limitation"
Five* Ways of Attack***• Single Direct Attack (SDA)• Attack By Combination (ABC)• Progressive Indirect Attack
(PIA)• (Hand) Immobilization Attack
(HIA)• Attack by Drawing (ABD)• Single Angle Attack (SAA)
[email protected] @lkuceo
Lee’s approach still needed a name
• He named his approach Jeet Kune Do - the way of the intercepting fist - after one of the principles taught in his method. He was quick to point out that it was just a name, a way of communicating a set of ideas. He was passionate that practitioners shouldn't get hung up on the name or the inclusion of any one move or action.
[email protected] @lkuceo
Jeet Kune Do encourages development of a uniquely personal style
• a framework from which to pick & develop a personal style
• an evolutionary approach where adoption of maneuvers is learned & reinforced by training with an opponent
• Nothing was sacred
"absorb that which is useful“
discard the remainder
[email protected] @lkuceo
Training with an opponent provides the core feedback loop to drive adaptation
Lee pursued ever more elaborate approaches to protected real combat training to enable the closed loop learning that was core to the evolutionary nature of JKD
[email protected] @lkuceo
Kata are not adaptive
In comparison with JKD, patterned styles of martial arts taught with "kata" were open loop and not adaptive. There is no learning from practicing kata
[email protected] @lkuceo
Water flows around the rock
“be like water”
the rock represents resistance
[email protected] @lkuceo
The Kanban Method
[email protected] @lkuceo
Kanban should be like water*
In change management, resistance is from the people involved and it is always emotional
To flow around the rock, we must learn how to avoid emotional resistance
* http://joecampbell.wordpress.com/2009/05/13/be-like-water/
[email protected] @lkuceo
Start with what you do now
• The Kanban Method evolved with the principle that it “should be like water” - enable change while avoiding sources of resistance
• With Kanban you start with what you do now, and "kanbanize" it, catalyzing the evolutionary process into action. Changes to processes in use will occur
• Evaluating whether a change is truly an improvement is done using fitness criteria that evaluate an external outcome
[email protected] @lkuceo
Fitness criteria are metrics that measure observable external outcomes
• Fitness criteria are metrics that measure things customers or other external stakeholders value– delivery time– Quality– Predictability– conformance to regulatory
requirements• or metrics that value actual
outcomes such as– customer satisfaction– employee satisfaction
[email protected] @lkuceo
Institutionalize feedback systems to enable evolutionary change
OperationsReview
SystemCapability
Review
StandupMeeting
manager to subordinate(s) (both 1-1 and 1-team)
[email protected] @lkuceo
Adaptive capability enables sustainable competitiveness
• Kanban installs an adaptive capability in the organization– the style of working - the methodology - emerges
and evolves, adapting gracefully to changes in business conditions, risks and uncertainties
• Such an adaptive capability makes the organization robust and resilient and enables the possibility of continued sustainable long term competitiveness
[email protected] @lkuceo
Kanban’s Core Enabling Concepts
Kanban is based on some simple concepts for managing work• service-orientation • service delivery involves workflow• and work flows through a series of information
discovery activities
Kanban would be less applicable if a service-orientated view of work were difficult to conceive or the work was without a definable workflow
[email protected] @lkuceo
6 Practices Enable Process Evolution
The Kanban Method
VisualizeLimit Work-in-progressManage FlowMake Policies ExplicitImplement Feedback LoopsImprove Collaboratively, Evolve Experimentally
(using models & the scientific method)
[email protected] @lkuceo
So, are we at the“end of methodology?”
[email protected] @lkuceo
So does the arrival of Kanban represent the end of methodologies?
No!We still need methodologies
There is still a need to know what to do, how to do it, when to do it and
who should perform specific activities.
Alistair Cockburn
[email protected] @lkuceo
Perhaps methodologies should be dead?
• Do we need to define roles and force people to fit their definitions? Is it better to let an individual's identity evolve and emerge in the context of a given organization?
• Transitioning methodologies is not compatible with humans
I don’t want to change.
I do want to grow
[email protected] @lkuceo
Give Permission for personal & organizational styles to emerge
• Give permission for personal and organizational styles of software engineering to emerge naturally rather than promoting methodology and adoption of defined methods
• Promote known good practices coupled with fast feedback mechanisms to encourage learning & adaptation
• Modern approaches to software architecture, design, programming and deployment all encourage fast feedback and short cycle times to encourage learning.
• Trends with communities of technical practice seem to indicate growing disillusionment with methodologies
[email protected] @lkuceo
The future of creative knowledge work should be inspired by Bruce Lee & JKD
• Our opponents are uncertainty & risk. Engage directly. Validate speculation quickly
• Teach beginners to set up safe-to-fail, learning environments at the individual, team and project level
• Validate assumptions early and quickly, deploy fake, prototype or real code to gain knowledge of what works and what doesn't
• Use modern technical practices inside an evolutionary framework
Train with live opponentsNo kata
No "dry land swimming“
[email protected] @lkuceo
To get beyond Agile we must embrace the “end of methodology”
• Perhaps now it is finally time to let go of methodology and embrace a whole new way of teaching and performing software engineering?
• The Agile Software Development movement has taken us some way down this path already. It encouraged the use of feedback loops and emergence of modern technical practices. Now we must complete the job and let go of Agile methodologies altogether!
[email protected] @lkuceo
Implications for CMMI
[email protected] @lkuceo
What does this mean for the CMMI?
• CMMI is methodology agnostic. A CMMI appraisal could be performed on an organization with a uniquely evolved software engineering method, utilizing evolutionary frameworks such as Lean Startup & Kanban
• There are implications for the CMMI model, though…
[email protected] @lkuceo
CMMI Model requires a defined process• Do we still expect a defined process? Do we expect it to
be “tailored” to a context? If so why? Is this just bureaucratic overhead?
• Bruce Lee would have viewed a defined process as a patterned style - dead, without learning or evolutionary capability
• Intelligent design or evolution which do you trust more?• Would it be better to modify the model to look for safe-
to-fail learning environments and evidence of process evolution rather than defined processes?
[email protected] @lkuceo
The “end of methodology” may represent a punctuation point in the
evolution of management
• Evolution progresses through a series of punctuated equilibriums
• The “end of methodology” is an opportunity for an explosion of new management thinking in creative knowledge worker industries
• And an opportunity to give the CMMI new relevance!
[email protected] @lkuceo
Will the "end of methodology" trigger a new wave of innovation in the CMMI?
• Will the model evolve to reflect recent understanding in complexity science and the need for reflective, adaptive organizations that are robust & resilient in the presence of uncertain, changing external conditions?
[email protected] @lkuceo
Thank you!
[email protected] @lkuceo
David Anderson is a thought leader in managing effective software teams. He leads a consulting, training, publishing and event planning business dedicated to developing, promoting and implementing sustainable evolutionary approaches for management of knowledge workers.He has 30 years experience in the high technology industry starting with computer games in the early 1980’s. He has led software teams delivering superior productivity and quality using innovative methods at large companies such as Sprint and Motorola.
David was a co-author of the SEI Technical Note, “Agile & CMMI: Why not embrace both!” He is the pioneer of the Kanban Method an evolutionary approach to change and improved business agility. His latest book is, Lessons in Agile Management – On the Road to Kanban.
David is a founder of the Lean Kanban University, a trade association dedicated to assuring quality of Kanban training through a network for member companies throughout the world.
About
[email protected] @lkuceo
Joe Campbell first blogged about the similarity in philosophy between the Kanban Method and the teachings of Bruce Lee. He coined the phrase “Kanban should be like water”.
“Safe-to-fail Experiment” is a term used by Dave Snowden in his Cynefin framework for comprehending complexity and managing in complex domain problems.
This presentation was inspired by Alistair Cockburn’s blog post “The End of Methodology” and a quote from Peter Senge, “People do not resist change, they resist being changed!”
Acknowledgements
[email protected] @lkuceo