KET-BSM meeting Aachen, April 2006 View from the Schauinsland in Freiburg a couple of weeks ago View...

21
KET-BSM meeting Aachen, April 2006 KET-BSM meeting Aachen, April 2006 View from the Schauinsland in Freiburg View from the Schauinsland in Freiburg a couple of weeks ago a couple of weeks ago Sascha Caron University of Freiburg How does nature behave at How does nature behave at 1TeV ? 1TeV ? A search strategy for SUSY et A search strategy for SUSY et al. al. that this is a short and simple talk that this is a short and simple talk ) )

Transcript of KET-BSM meeting Aachen, April 2006 View from the Schauinsland in Freiburg a couple of weeks ago View...

KET-BSM meeting Aachen, April 2006KET-BSM meeting Aachen, April 2006

View from the Schauinsland in Freiburg a couple of weeks agoView from the Schauinsland in Freiburg a couple of weeks ago

Sascha Caron

University of Freiburg

How does nature behave at How does nature behave at 1TeV ?1TeV ?

A search strategy for SUSY et al. A search strategy for SUSY et al.

(Note that this is a short and simple talk(Note that this is a short and simple talk) )

The situation in 2005The situation in 2005

• We still don’t know the origin of EW symmetry breaking We still don’t know the origin of EW symmetry breaking The Higgs boson is not discovered yetThe Higgs boson is not discovered yet

• Even with the SM Higgs: Even with the SM Higgs: ‘‘fine tuning’ is required in the model to remain valid to high energies?,fine tuning’ is required in the model to remain valid to high energies?, Gravity is not included?, Fermion masses? What is Dark Matter?,…Gravity is not included?, Fermion masses? What is Dark Matter?,…

typical solutions by increasing the number oftypical solutions by increasing the number of symmetries, dimensions, forces, …symmetries, dimensions, forces, …

Higgs ? Something else?Higgs ? Something else?

Sascha Caron page 1Sascha Caron page 1

Investigate if there is Investigate if there is other physics beyond the other physics beyond the Standard ModelStandard Model

Investigate if there is Investigate if there is other physics beyond the other physics beyond the Standard ModelStandard Model

Investigate if EW Investigate if EW symmetry breaking symmetry breaking is caused by the Higgs.is caused by the Higgs.

Investigate if EW Investigate if EW symmetry breaking symmetry breaking is caused by the Higgs.is caused by the Higgs.

Part 1Part 1Higgs working groupsHiggs working groupsat ATLAS and CMSat ATLAS and CMS

Part 1Part 1Higgs working groupsHiggs working groupsat ATLAS and CMSat ATLAS and CMS

Part 2Part 2This approach:This approach:

Data mining strategies Data mining strategies How to find something potentially How to find something potentially

interesting and previously interesting and previously unexpected in the data?unexpected in the data?

Part 2Part 2This approach:This approach:

Data mining strategies Data mining strategies How to find something potentially How to find something potentially

interesting and previously interesting and previously unexpected in the data?unexpected in the data?

The situation in 2005The situation in 2005

Sascha Caron page 2Sascha Caron page 2

What do we expect to find at the LHC?What do we expect to find at the LHC?

The situation in 2005The situation in 2005

One physicist's schematic view of particle physics in the 21st centuryOne physicist's schematic view of particle physics in the 21st century (Courtesy of Hitoshi Murayama)(Courtesy of Hitoshi Murayama)Sascha Caron page 17Sascha Caron page 17

MSSM

CMSSM

SUSY VERSIONSOF THE SM

NMSSM(an additional Higgssinglet)

MN2SSM

SUSY with extra DimOr SUSY with extra forcesOr ….

The situation in 2005The situation in 2005

Choose this point,Choose this point,look at the LHC data,look at the LHC data,

exclude or not!exclude or not!

Sascha Caron page 18Sascha Caron page 18

We found no deviation We have excluded this point/area which

is epsilon of the parameter space

We found a deviation

Does this mean that the ‘real’ modelis this parameter point?

Is it efficient to work like this?Is it efficient to work like this?

Examples:Examples:General Search for new Phenomena at H1 (2004) andGeneral Search for new Phenomena at H1 (2004) and

D0 Sleuth analysis (2002 but only top final states)D0 Sleuth analysis (2002 but only top final states)

Finding the unexpected – explaining the originFinding the unexpected – explaining the origin

New Strategy: START FROM THE DATANew Strategy: START FROM THE DATA

1)1) Search for deviations in Search for deviations in allall final states final states(they are all interesting either as signal or to understand background)(they are all interesting either as signal or to understand background)

2)2) Determine ‘deviation(s)’ or ‘inconsistencies’ (e.g. all muon finalDetermine ‘deviation(s)’ or ‘inconsistencies’ (e.g. all muon final states have problems)states have problems)3) Determine their origin (detector effect, etc.)3) Determine their origin (detector effect, etc.)

4)4) Re-determine expectation and Re-determine expectation and Go to step 1) until publication in refereed journal Go to step 1) until publication in refereed journal

Sascha Caron page 19Sascha Caron page 19

(btw. it would be nice(btw. it would be niceto speed up steps 1-4)to speed up steps 1-4)

• Event yields for HERA 1 data (all channels with SM exp. > 0.01 event)

• Good agreement for (almost) all channels

Example: H1 General SearchExample: H1 General Search

Sascha Caron page 19Sascha Caron page 19

Channels which have Channels which have not been syst. studied beforenot been syst. studied before

We investigatedAll Mall and ΣPT

distributions

Sascha Caron page 22Sascha Caron page 22

We developed We developed a simple algorithma simple algorithmto find and quantifyto find and quantify

deviations deviations automaticallyautomatically

General SearchGeneral Search

Sascha Caron page 19Sascha Caron page 19

I spend some time at the New Phenomena web pages at LHCI spend some time at the New Phenomena web pages at LHCexperimentsexperiments

A count of final states planned to be studied leads to A count of final states planned to be studied leads to 100-500100-500

However consider permutations of j,b,e,However consider permutations of j,b,e,µ,µ,ττ,v,,v,γγ, + consider e.g. charge?, + consider e.g. charge?

Up to 8 particle final states lead to about Up to 8 particle final states lead to about 4000040000

Did you have events with 2 photons , a jet and a muon at your LEP exp.?Did you have events with 2 photons , a jet and a muon at your LEP exp.?

General SearchGeneral Search

Sascha Caron page 19Sascha Caron page 19

I spend some time at the New Phenomena web pages at LHCI spend some time at the New Phenomena web pages at LHCexperimentsexperiments

A count of final states planned to be studied leads to A count of final states planned to be studied leads to 100-500100-500

However consider permutations of j,b,e,However consider permutations of j,b,e,µ,µ,ττ,v,,v,γγ, + consider e.g. charge?, + consider e.g. charge?

Up to 8 particle final states lead to about Up to 8 particle final states lead to about 4000040000

Yes I know we do not want to start with 40000 finalYes I know we do not want to start with 40000 finalstates at ATLAS states at ATLAS

What is the strategy?What is the strategy?

Is this possible at LHC? Is this possible at LHC?

Is this the best strategy for Is this the best strategy for

‘ ‘early discovery’?early discovery’?

What do we need for this search?What do we need for this search?

What can we learn from theory?What can we learn from theory?

Is this possible at LHC ? Is this possible at LHC ?

Yes ! H1 has made the Yes ! H1 has made the ‘proof of principle’‘proof of principle’

Is this the best strategy for Is this the best strategy for ‘ ‘early discovery’?early discovery’?

I’m not sure to be honest.I’m not sure to be honest.We (Freiburg) start from a ‘simpler’ We (Freiburg) start from a ‘simpler’

scenario and extend (after we know scenario and extend (after we know some of the physics at 1 TeV)some of the physics at 1 TeV)

Attempt : Start from channels where you Attempt : Start from channels where you expect something new but you don’t expect something new but you don’t know what exactlyknow what exactly

pT_miss channels (Dark Matter…?)pT_miss channels (Dark Matter…?) Idea: less model dependent SUSY Idea: less model dependent SUSY

searchessearches

What do we need for this search?What do we need for this search?

- Theory (with uncertainty) in all channelsTheory (with uncertainty) in all channels (Multi purpose event generators)(Multi purpose event generators)

- Uncertainties and fudge factors from dataUncertainties and fudge factors from data (calibration with candles, use data without (calibration with candles, use data without

pt_miss, use fits to fudge factors, use a global pt_miss, use fits to fudge factors, use a global strategy, make ‘fake data’ for each channel, use strategy, make ‘fake data’ for each channel, use fast ways to go from 1-4)fast ways to go from 1-4)

- Later: A way to learn what we haveLater: A way to learn what we have (LHC olympics, QUAERO, Bard) (LHC olympics, QUAERO, Bard)

People interested to join such an effort in GermanyPeople interested to join such an effort in Germany

An General analysis of LHC dataAn General analysis of LHC data

Theory and ‘Going the way into the other direction’…Theory and ‘Going the way into the other direction’…

(Yes this is known as the ‘inverse problem’ now, but my transperancy is older(Yes this is known as the ‘inverse problem’ now, but my transperancy is older))

What can we learn from theory?What can we learn from theory?

What are ‘model independent’ the What are ‘model independent’ the best variables to measure best variables to measure

(Et, mass, something else?)(Et, mass, something else?)

What do you need to determine What do you need to determine nature@1TeV? nature@1TeV?

Is their an interest to work Is their an interest to work togethertogether

(background, signal determination) (background, signal determination)

A significant danger is finding correlations and signalsA significant danger is finding correlations and signals that do not really exist. that do not really exist.

Many examples in particle physics historyMany examples in particle physics history

We are looking for deviations …We are looking for deviations …How surprised should we be to find some?How surprised should we be to find some?

How likely is a 4-5 sigma deviation at LHCHow likely is a 4-5 sigma deviation at LHCeven if there is nothing in the data?even if there is nothing in the data?

Sascha Caron page 24Sascha Caron page 24 Unsolvable problem if you use 2000 PhD studentsUnsolvable problem if you use 2000 PhD students

Step 1: Repeat the whole analysis with a pseudo data experiment(dice your own MC data) many times.

Quantify the deviationsQuantify the deviations

3%3%

Sascha Caron page 25Sascha Caron page 25

Step 2: Count how manytimes you find deviations bigger than in those in your real data.

3%3% of the of the ““Pseudo H1 experiments”Pseudo H1 experiments”

have found have found a bigger deviation a bigger deviation

Num

ber

of c

hann

els

Num

ber

of c

hann

els

1 101 10-1-1 10 10-2-2 ProbabilityProbabilityto find to find

deviation indeviation inthis channelthis channel

I know that this is not a new idea, but we do not often use itI know that this is not a new idea, but we do not often use it

What are the numbers for ATLAS?What are the numbers for ATLAS?

SummarySummaryI’ve tried to illustrate I’ve tried to illustrate

some ideas for the ‘searches’ at LHC (ATLAS)some ideas for the ‘searches’ at LHC (ATLAS)and what our group is interested to doand what our group is interested to do