Keokuk Community Report · comprehensive assessment • In a secure and nurturing environment that...
Transcript of Keokuk Community Report · comprehensive assessment • In a secure and nurturing environment that...
Keokuk Community ReportSchool Board PresentationAugust 15, 2016
Keokuk Community Schools Mission Statement
The Keokuk Community School District provides an
educational foundation where students are active
participants in becoming adaptable and critical thinkers
along with achieving the skills necessary
(academic/vocational) for lifetime success. (Dec. 2008)
2
2015-2016Beliefs of the Keokuk School DistrictWe believe:
• Child development and education are the highest priorities for the Keokuk Community School District
• In students mastering basic academic skills in the early grades confirmed by comprehensive assessment
• In identifying proficiencies in all levels and content areas based on high standards and confirmed by comprehensive assessment
• In a secure and nurturing environment that builds self-esteem
• In a learning environment appropriate for the changing needs of our studentsand work world
• In clean and safe facilities
3
2015-2016Beliefs of the Keokuk Community School District Cont…
• In schools which value and understand each student’ uniqueness and enable all students to reach their full potential
• In treating all students with respect
• In the development of social responsibility and citizenship
• Schools should create opportunities for exploration and preparation for a diversity of careers
• In providing effective professional staff leadership
• That staff are more effective when supported by family and community
• That involvement by and communication among the community, family, staffand learners is vital to education at all levels
• In utilizing technology to improve student achievement
4
2015-2016Objectives of the Keokuk Community School District
1. Provide a safe learning environment where each student is accepted, valued, respected, encouraged and supported.
2. Provide a wide range of programs that actively engage and assist students in becoming critical thinkers and good citizens.
3. Build a curriculum that focuses on learning and assessment.
4. Provide preparation for a diversity of careers to enrich students’ future which may require college, special training, or technical skills.
5. Increase student, faculty, family and community participation in the educational environment.
6. Ensure all staff have the necessary training, skills, and knowledge to support the educational environment.
7. Provide efficient, clean, safe, well-maintained and well-equipped facilities to createa positive learning environment.
5
2015-2016Long-Term KCSD District Goals
1. We will increase the number of students who show a year’s plus growth on district assessments by improving teaching and learning practices.
1. We will improve the culture and climate in the district through the use of Positive Behavior and Intervention and Supports (PBIS).
1. We will begin to implement the Iowa Core Curriculum, and continue to improve quality instructional strategies through the use of various resources including technology.
6
7
Data Analysis2015 – 2016 Summative Data
2015-2016District Assessments
Administered
• Iowa Assessment • Grades 2-11 in April
• Measurement of Academic Progress (MAP)• Grades K-11 (Fall, Winter and Spring)
• Reading, Math, Science (Not all buildings administer Science)
• Pre-School GOLD Assessment
• Classroom Formative/Summative Assessments
• Individual Growth Development Indicators (IGDI) (PreK)
• Formative Assessment System for Teachers (FAST) Assessment (K-3)
What our data indicates are our areas of strength, needs for
growth, and areas of disproportionality.
8
2015-2016 KCSD IA Assessment4th, 8th, and 11th Grade Reading
Grades 4, 8, and 11 % Proficient as measured by Iowa Assessment (Reading)
2015-2016 KCSD IA Assessment4th, 8th, and 11th Grade Math
2015-2016 KCSD IA Assessment4th, 8th, and 11th Grade Science
2015-2016(All) 2-11 IA Assessment % Proficient/Advanced
Grade Reading Math Science
2nd 70% 56% 53%
3rd 68% 75% 77%
4th 71% 78% 81%
5th 77% 74% 74%
6th 76% 71% 70%
7th 70% 75% 73%
8th 74% 66% 78%
9th 78% 74% 72%
10th 84% 79% 75%
11th 68% 72% 60%
2015-2016(All) 2-11 IA Assessment % Advanced
Grade Reading Math Science
2nd 14% 15% 6%
3rd 11% 22% 18%
4th 23% 23% 20%
5th 25% 21% 16%
6th 21% 15% 12%
7th 19% 15% 13%
8th 14% 10% 13%
9th 18% 7% 9%
10th 22% 9% 12%
11th 8% 16% 18%
2014-2015All (FAY) 2-11 IA Assessment % Proficient
Grade Reading Math Science
2nd 64% 62% 56%
3rd 75% 79% 80%
4th 80% 76% 88%
5th 78% 79% 85%
6th 74% 75% 74%
7th 66% 75% 72%
8th 56% 63% 80%
9th 75% 72% 74%
10th 79% 76% 72%
11th 68% 68% 66%
2014-2015/2015-2016(All) 2-11 IA Assessment % Proficient/Advanced
Grade 2014-2015
Reading
2015-2016
Reading
2014-2015
Math
2015-2016
Math
2014-2015
Science
2015-2016
Science
2nd 64% 70% 62% 55% 56% 54%
3rd 75% 68% 79% 75% 80% 78%
4th 80% 71% 76% 78% 88% 84%
5th 78% 77% 79% 74% 85% 78%
6th 74% 76% 75% 71% 74% 73%
7th 66% 70% 75% 75% 72% 77%
8th 56% 74% 63% 66% 80% 82%
9th 75% 78% 72% 74% 74% 77%
10th 79% 84% 76% 79% 72% 80%
11th 68% 64% 68% 73% 66% 66%
2014-2015/2015-2016(All) 2-11 IA Assessment % Proficient/Advanced
Grade 2014-2015
Reading
2015-2016
Reading
2014-2015
Math
2015-2016
Math
2014-2015
Science
2015-2016
Science
2nd 64% 70% 62% 55% 56% 54%
3rd 75% 68% 79% 75% 80% 78%
4th 80% 71% 76% 78% 88% 84%
5th 78% 77% 79% 74% 85% 78%
6th 74% 76% 75% 71% 74% 73%
7th 66% 70% 75% 75% 72% 77%
8th 56% 74% 63% 66% 80% 82%
9th 75% 78% 72% 74% 74% 77%
10th 79% 84% 76% 79% 72% 80%
11th 68% 64% 68% 73% 66% 66%
2014-2015/2015-2016(All) 2-11 IA Assessment % Proficient/Advanced
Grade 2014-2015
Reading
2015-2016
Reading
2014-2015
Math
2015-2016
Math
2014-2015
Science
2015-2016
Science
2nd 64% 70% 62% 55% 56% 54%
3rd 75% 68% 79% 75% 80% 78%
4th 80% 71% 76% 78% 88% 84%
5th 78% 77% 79% 74% 85% 78%
6th 74% 76% 75% 71% 74% 73%
7th 66% 70% 75% 75% 72% 77%
8th 56% 74% 63% 66% 80% 82%
9th 75% 78% 72% 74% 74% 77%
10th 79% 84% 76% 79% 72% 80%
11th 68% 64% 68% 73% 66% 66%
2014-2015/2015-2016(All) 2-11 IA Assessment % Proficient/Advanced
Grade 2014-2015
Reading
2015-2016
Reading
2014-2015
Math
2015-2016
Math
2014-2015
Science
2015-2016
Science
2nd 64% 70% 62% 55% 56% 54%
3rd 75% 68% 79% 75% 80% 78%
4th 80% 71% 76% 78% 88% 84%
5th 78% 77% 79% 74% 85% 78%
6th 74% 76% 75% 71% 74% 73%
7th 66% 70% 75% 75% 72% 77%
8th 56% 74% 63% 66% 80% 82%
9th 75% 78% 72% 74% 74% 77%
10th 79% 84% 76% 79% 72% 80%
11th 68% 64% 68% 73% 66% 66%
2015-20162nd Grade IA Assessment % Proficient
Subgroup Reading Math Science
All 70% 56% 53%
White 69% 54% 57%
African American 67% 44% 22%
Hispanic 75% 50% 50%
Students with an IEP 18% 18% 27%
Students without an
IEP
74% 58% 56%
Free/Reduced 66% 54% 50%
Non Free/Reduced 81% 58% 67%
2015-20163rd Grade IA Assessment % Proficient
Subgroup Reading Math Science
All 68% 75% 77%
White 67% 75% 79%
African American 71% 72% 71%
Hispanic 67% 100% 100%
Students with an IEP 30% 56% 79%
Students without an
IEP
75% 78% 79%
Free/Reduced 60% 67% 74%
Non Free/Reduced 87% 93% 89%
2015-20164th Grade IA Assessment % Proficient
Subgroup Reading Math Science
All 71% 78% 81%
White 74% 80% 85%
African American 67% 67% 67%
Hispanic 50% 50% 83%
Students with an IEP 16% 28% 52%
Students without an
IEP
85% 90% 92%
Free/Reduced 67% 70% 81%
Non Free/Reduced 79% 90% 92%
2015-20165th Grade IA Assessment % Proficient
Subgroup Reading Math Science
All 77% 74% 74%
White 76% 77% 76%
African American 100% 50% 75%
Hispanic 67% 67% 67%
Students with an IEP 38% 42% 46%
Students without an
IEP
87% 83% 86%
Free/Reduced 71% 67% 76%
Non Free/Reduced 85% 86% 81%
2015-20166th Grade IA Assessment % Proficient
Subgroup Reading Math Science
All 76% 71% 70%
White 76% 72% 74%
African American 78% 44% 55%
Hispanic 67% 67% 67%
Students with an IEP 35% 20% 45%
Students without an
IEP
85% 82% 79%
Free/Reduced 73% 68% 67%
Non Free/Reduced 82% 67% 84%
2015-20167th Grade IA Assessment % Proficient
Subgroup Reading Math Science
All 70% 75% 73%
White 69% 75% 80%
African American 60% 40% 20%
Hispanic 100% 71% 72%
Students with an IEP 46% 31% 38%
Students without an
IEP
73% 80% 83%
Free/Reduced 60% 68% 68%
Non Free/Reduced 84% 84% 90%
2015-20168th Grade IA Assessment % Proficient
Subgroup Reading Math Science
All 74% 66% 78%
White 76% 68% 83%
African American 44% 67% 78%
Hispanic 80% 60% 80%
Students with an IEP 25% 4% 42%
Students without an
IEP
85% 80% 91%
Free/Reduced 67% 64% 78%
Non Free/Reduced 83% 70% 88%
2015-20169th Grade IA Assessment % Proficient
Subgroup Reading Math Science
All 78% 74% 72%
White 80% 75% 78%
African American 25% 100% 75%
Hispanic 84% 83% 84%
Students with an IEP 35% 29% 24%
Students without an
IEP
85% 81% 86%
Free/Reduced 72% 68% 73%
Non Free/Reduced 87% 81% 83%
2015-201610th Grade IA Assessment % Proficient
Subgroup Reading Math Science
All 84% 79% 75%
White 86% 80% 81%
African American 57% 57% 80%
Hispanic 80% 80% 80%
Students with an IEP 55% 35% 45%
Students without an
IEP
90% 86% 86%
Free/Reduced 74% 71% 72%
Non Free/Reduced 97% 87% 89%
2015-201611th Grade IA Assessment % Proficient
Subgroup Reading Math Science
All 68% 72% 60%
White 66% 75% 68%
African American 0% 0% 0%
Hispanic 75% 100% 100%
Students with an IEP 10% 30% 30%
Students without an
IEP
74% 80% 72%
Free/Reduced 48% 60% 49%
Non Free/Reduced 78% 84% 79%
Measurement of Academic Progress (MAP) Spring Reading ResultsGrade Level KCSD Average RIT/Grade Level Grade Level Norm
K 157 158.1
1 176 177.5
2 191 188.7
3 198 198.6
4 207 205.9
5 212 211.8
6 215 215.8
7 216 218.2
8 221 220.1
9 221 221.9
10 226 221.2
11 226 222.3
Measurement of Academic Progress (MAP) Spring Math ResultsGrade Level KCSD Average RIT/Grade Level Spring Grade Level Norm
K 155 159.1
1 178 180.8
2 197 192.1
3 202 203.4
4 211 213.5
5 219 221.4
6 221 225.3
7 226 228.6
8 228 230.9
9 233 233.4
10 239 232.4
11 239 235
Measurement of Academic Progress (MAP) Spring Science ResultsGrade Level KCSD Average RIT/Grade Level Grade Level Norm
K
1
2
3
4
5
6 208 208.6
7 N/A 210.9
8 215 213.5
9 216 N/A
10 218 N/A
11 221 N/A
2015-2016 Hawthorne Elementary Early Literacy Data (FAST Assessment)
Grade % Students At/Above
Benchmark (Fall)
% Students At/Above
Benchmark (Winter)
% Students At/Above
Benchmark (Spring)
All 45% 62% 56%
K 47% 83% 54%
1 34% 51% 54%
2 50% 55% 51%
3 49% 61% 63%
2015-2016 Hawthorne Elementary Early Literacy Data (Fall % Students At/Above Benchmark)
2015-2016 Hawthorne Elementary Early Literacy Data (Winter % Students At/Above Benchmark)
2015-2016 Hawthorne Elementary Early Literacy Data (Spring % Students At/Above Benchmark)
2015-2016 KCSD Bullying/Harassment Referral DataBuilding Hawthorne
Elementary
School
George
Washington
Elementary
School
Keokuk Middle
School
Keokuk High
School
Bullying Majors
and Minors
21 18 3 2
Harassment
Majors and
Minors
50 2 13 1
37
GoalsReview of 2015 - 2016 Goals
Set 2016 – 2017 Goals
2015-2016Keokuk CSD APR Goals
*SIAC Goals measuredby Iowa Assessment
2016-2017Keokuk CSD APR Goals to be Set
*Results from 2015-2016 as measured by Iowa Assessments
Grade Reading Math ScienceBullying and
Harassment
2nd (51%) – FAST
(70%) – IA
(56%) - IA (53%) - IA
3rd (63%) – FAST
(68%) – IA
(75%) - IA (77%) - IA
4th (71%) (*78%)
(GOAL = 85%)
(81%)
8th (*74%)
(GOAL = 80%)
(75%) (73%)
11th (68%) (72%) (*60%)
(GOAL = 80%)
PreK - 12 (1 found incident)
40
Proposal for 2016-2017Building Level SIAC Committees
2015-2016Long-Term KCSD District Goals
1. We will increase the number of students who show a year’s plus growth on district assessments by improving teaching and learning practices.
(Need to set a baseline)
2. We will improve the culture and climate in the district through the use of Positive Behavior and Intervention and Supports (PBIS).
(Need to identify measures)
3. We will begin to implement the Iowa Core Curriculum, and continueto improve quality instructional strategies through the use of variousresources including technology.
(Curriculum needs to be aligned with the Iowa CORE.)
41
2016-2017Keokuk CSD APR Proposed Goals
*Results from 2015-2016 as measured by Iowa Assessments
Grade Reading Math ScienceBullying and
Harassment
2nd (Fast = 51%)
State Avg. = 70%
NG = 56%
3rd (Fast = 63%)
State Avg. = 68%
NG = 68%
4th 3rd = 74.1%
NG = 80%
8th 7th = 74.8%
NG = 80%
11th 10th = 71.5%
NG = 80%
PreK - 12 KCSD will continue
to improvement of
defining
A systemic look at our goals at all levels
District Goals
Building Goals
PLC Team, Individual Student,
& Individual Professional Development Goals and Monitoring
43
2016-2017Proposed SIAC Structure
• SIAC Committees at the building level for each building with a representative to the District SIAC committee.
• Building level monitoring of formative data specific to their level.
• Building level ownership of the results by school level SIAC committee.
• Greater involvement in the process:• Staff• Students• Parents• Community
• Additional Thoughts…
Thank you for your time and input this evening!
45