KENZO TANGE: THE ARCHITECT OF POSTWAR JAPANESE … · 2017. 5. 12. · Kenzo Tange’s...
Transcript of KENZO TANGE: THE ARCHITECT OF POSTWAR JAPANESE … · 2017. 5. 12. · Kenzo Tange’s...
1 | P a g e
KENZO TANGE:
THE ARCHITECT OF POSTWAR JAPANESE MODERNISM
CONNOR PETER ROBSON – 16007119
KA4025 – 2016/17
2 | P a g e
CONTENTS
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS 3
INTRODUCTION 4
1 DEVELOPMENT AND EXPERIMENTATION
(1946-1958) 5
2 URBAN PLANNING, METABOLISM AND POST-ECONOMIC MIRACLE
(1958-1996) 8
CONCLUSION 12
APPENDIX 13
REFERENCES 15
BIBLIOGRAPHY 17
3 | P a g e
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS (WITH CREDITS)
CHAPTER 1
Figure 1.1 Hiroshima Peace Memorial Museum. “Hiroshima Peace Memorial Park, an
unforgettable place in my life”. explorejapan.jp. ExploreJapan. n.d. Web. 8
May 2017, 11:10.
Figure 1.2 Robson, Connor. “Hiroshima Peace Memorial Park Cenotaph”. 2016. PNG
file.
CHAPTER 2
Figure 2.1 Robson, Connor. “Conceptual Diagram of Kenzo Tange’s 1960 Tokyo Plan”.
2017. PNG file.
Figure 2.2 The Yoyogi National Gymnasium complex. “Olympic construction transformed
Tokyo”. japantimes.co.jp. The Japan Times. 10 Oct 2014. Web. 8 May 2017,
11:19.
Figure 2.3 Tepper, Natalie. Fuji-Sankei Communications Group Headquarters Building.
n.d. Architectural Excellence: 500 Iconic Buildings. By Paul Cattermole.
Compendium Publishing Limited, London, 2008. Print.
APPENDIX
Figure 3.1 Robson, Connor. “Keio University Shonan Fujisawa Campus Courtyard”.
2016. PNG file.
4 | P a g e
INTRODUCTION
Kenzo Tange (1913-2005), a Japanese-born architect, is credited with being one of the key
practitioners of the Modernist movement within Japan, adapting 1930s euro-modernist theory
to the cultural concerns and issues of a devastated, post-war Japan. The country’s
requirements during this period placed Tange in a key position due to his interest in urban
planning and redevelopment.
Through involvement with the Congrès Internationaux d’Architecture Moderne (CIAM), the
1960 World Design Conference and 1970 World Exposition, Tange played a major role in
both bringing western development to Japan and establishing a post-war Japanese style
within the world architectural community. Both were progressed by the next generation of
Japanese architects, many of whom Tange had taught or influenced, including the pioneers of
the Metabolist movement, impacting the development and attitudes of modern Japanese
architecture.
5 | P a g e
CHAPTER 1:
DEVELOPMENT AND EXPERIMENTATION
(1946 – 1958)
Kenzo Tange began his career under the modernist architect, Kunio Maekawa, building up
his reputation through competitions. During this formative period, he became a part of the
international debate within the CIAM, with particular interest in the 1933 ‘functional city’
debate. His early designs were heavily inspired by Le Corbusier, but most of his work prior to
1949 was never built.
Tange’s international acclaim began when he won the 1946 competition to design a memorial
museum at ground zero in Hiroshima, with the architect later being commissioned to design
the surrounding park also. Both Hiroshima Peace Memorial Museum (Figure 1.1) and its
surrounding park illustrate the key goals of Tange’s architectural work: the introduction of
international developments into Japanese architecture and the continuation of the 1930s’
growth and prosperity.
Figure 1.1
Hiroshima Peace Memorial Museum
6 | P a g e
The modernist components of the design are immediately apparent, with the slight pilotis,
created using reinforced concrete,1 allowing free mass movement under the building. The
significance of the building helped popularize concrete construction within Japan, which
would have been impossible without introducing western advances in engineering due to the
country’s previous reliance on timber.2 However, Japanese tradition was not fully omitted,
seen in the building being elevated and the horizontality of the space’s layout. The best
example of his initial goals, however, was the western engineered form of the cenotaph
(Figure 1.2) which mimics the roofs of ancient Japanese haniwa, previously used to mark
mass tombs during the war-torn Kofun period (c. 250 to c. 600 CE). 3
Figure 2.2
Hiroshima Peace Memorial
Park Cenotaph
7 | P a g e
This stage of Tange’s career is usually referred to as his first phase, a time when his ideas and
aspirations were limited or not entirely realised, instead relying on Japanese tradition and Le
Corbusier’s inspiration. For example, Tange used the recessed windows of the Unité
d’Habitation, along with courtyards and veranda-like balconies, indicative of shrine and
palace architecture. Tange was heavily criticized for his reliance on tradition, with his
attempts to replicate Japanese timber construction with steel and concrete unwarranted.
In response to the criticism and to further his own goals, Tange undertook a large number of
projects, primarily local government buildings, between 1955 and 1958. This second phase
was focused on developing a less traditional language and experimented with new concepts,
including the combination of both Western and Japanese styles into a single residence, which
is in heavy demand today.4 A significant example is the town hall of Imabari, where he
experimented with raw concrete facades, using light to emphasize the striking material
qualities of the projecting walls, developed in previous designs, resembling Italian architect
Pier Luigi Nervi’s work.5
1958 saw his third phase, a more mature style, focusing more on utilizing space than its
context. He continued to develop his Brutalist concrete structuring alongside other concepts,
diverging from euro-modernism and Le Corbusier’s school of thought. He even challenged
the Swiss’ solution for merging residential and commercial areas together within mass
housing units, preferring a more organic arrangement of space; 6 an idea which was further
debated as part of the Metabolists’ founding principles.
8 | P a g e
CHAPTER 2:
URBAN PLANNING, METABOLISM AND POST-ECONOMIC MIRACLE
(1958-1996)
The 1960s was a period of growth and change within Japan, with Tange able to explore his
utopian ideas for urban regeneration alongside architects of similar disposition. After vast
amounts of experimentation and theoretical work, Tange and the group’s work culminated at
the 1970 World Exhibition in Osaka, before parting ways. Tange continued to practice
Modernist and Metabolist architecture until his death in 2005.
With his premier foray into urban planning, Tange produced the Tokyo Plan 1960: a first
attempt to reorganise a metropolis, 10 million inhabitants strong. The design had been
developing throughout his previous works, many of which fit into it, with Tange proposing
Figure 2.1
Conceptual Diagram of Kenzo
Tange’s 1960 Tokyo Plan
9 | P a g e
the conversion from radial plan to a central axis, expanding into the underdeveloped bay,
functioning much like the corridors in residential architecture imported to Japan in the 19th
century.1 The city would be organised using the ‘open building’ approach on a large scale,
allowing the city to develop itself without the need for complete renewal. It is also apparent
that Tange’s references to tradition were becoming more conceptual, with the concept of
‘impermanence’ being rethought and repurposed to a modern era. Tange’s plan also bared
resemblance to Le Corbusier’s Paris Voisin (1925), but elected to connect key
megastructures via elevated pathways, opposed to the individualistic isolation of the Swiss’
proposal.
By the World Design Conference 1960 in Tokyo, Tange had long been part of the
international community, unlike other Japanese architects, placing him uniquely to help
define Japan’s place within it. The conference saw Tange introduce several of Japan’s current
most famous designers, some of whom he’d taught. The most famous of his students were
those who formed the Metabolists, based on Tange’s utopian principals of creating organic
cities able to transform with the times.2 They would debate the fundamental requirements of
Japanese architecture, including the development of a unique national identity and the
appropriation of the western megastructure typology. Selling their manifesto, Metabolism
1960: Proposals for a New Urbanism, at the event, Tange himself had no work published
within it. His later work, however, very much reflected the theories of the group, in the
development of a true international style, devoid of history and site context.3
The architecture of the Olympic Stadiums (Figure 2.2), highly praised for their atypical
structuralism, were primary examples of Tange’s own Metabolist designs. The mechanistic
dynamic layout and engineering of reinforced concrete walls bore influence from Eero
Saarinen’s curvilinear architectural language, adapted for a Metabolist style, whilst also
appearing similar to older temple architecture. The occasion of the 1964 Tokyo Olympics
allowed Tange’s bid to establish a Japanese architectural language, having readjusted western
architectural techniques and technology, such as the suspension of the roofs by cable, for the
world stage, laying the foundations upon which his students would build. Also addressing
concerns of maximum utilization of used land via multipurpose space,4 the stadiums were set
along a North-South axis to conform to Tange’s own 1960 Tokyo Plan, which itself was
partially realised in the 1965 regeneration of Skopje, Macedonia.
10 | P a g e
The Metabolists created primarily theoretical concepts until their climax in the form of the
1970 World Exposition, master planned by Tange, who invited them to design a number of
the pavilions used for the event.. Tange himself designed a highly organic layout,
highlighting Osaka’s topography, using a central axis to efficiently organize communications.
The Theme Space’s 3 level plan, parodying that of Tange’s Tokyo Plan, showed off the
spatial organization, but further exploration was limited, and the World Exposition is
considered to be the end of Metabolists as a group, with members taking different approaches
to developing the theory. The event also seemed to bring to an end the movement’s influence,
as the Metabolist designs were largely passed over by mainstream media, who were more
interested in the promotion of Japan’s advancing technology,5 although Team 10, as well as
British group, Archigram, were notably persuaded by the concepts and theories on show.
After this, Tange took on international projects, never faltering from Metabolism, rejecting
Post-Modernism.6 For instance, his urban planning pursuits saw him propose a lateral axis
through Paris in 1985. However, Tange continued to take commissions within Japan from
various sources. The Fuji-Sankei Communications Group Headquarters Building (Figure
Figure 2.2
The Yoyogi National
Gymnasium complex
11 | P a g e
2.3), completed in 1996, intrinsically linked three buildings, organising them organically
around the required communications, leaving voids in space to suggest the possibility of
future growth,7 showing he was never strayed far from Metabolist theory.
Figure 2.3
Fuji-Sankei Communications
Group Headquarters Building
12 | P a g e
CONCLUSION
Kenzo Tange’s architectural legacy can be measured by how well he fulfilled his goals and
the influence he had on the development of Japanese architecture. On one hand, his works
and urban planning were unable to emulate the urban and cultural growth of 1930s. On the
other hand, his buildings, many of which have since become iconic landmarks, have
undoubtedly been influential, succeeding in adapting international developments. The next
generation were thoroughly invested in the merits of its application both within Japan and
internationally, effectively modernising Japanese architecture through Tange’s metabolic
cycle of constant development and innovation. He has found solutions to various post-war
issues, many of which Japanese architects still debate, including the usage of multifunctional,
open space and reducing the amount wasted.7 His role in moving away from traditional
architecture can also be felt in the modern Japanese disregard for set style, shape or size.8
Finally, Tange’s influence on Japanese architecture can be felt through the architects he
inspired, who have derived their own styles, and continue to enhance and bring Japan to the
forefront of architectural consciousness.
13 | P a g e
APPENDIX
In addition to the content already discussed, it is worth briefly reviewing a few of the
architectural careers Tange has influenced. For this, I have decided to focus on two of the
more famous examples, whose works have been recognised internationally in the form of the
Pritzker Prize: Fumihiko Maki (1993 Laurette) and Tadao Ando (1995 Laurette).
Fumihiko Maki, one of Tange’s University of Tokyo students, embraced a fairly similar
worldview to that of Tange, as can be seen in the similarities between their buildings, such as
the use of raw concrete walls and courtyards. One of the more notable aspects of his career is
his exploration of the unification of western and Japanese architecture: a concept which is in
high demand currently and one that Tange had also tackled.
Figure 3.1
Keio University Shonan
Fujisawa Campus Courtyard
14 | P a g e
Unlike Maki, Tadao Ando did not study directly under Kenzo Tange, although, in interviews,
it is evident that Ando harbours a great deal of respect for Tange. Ando’s works, much like
that of Tange and Maki, often bare large concrete facades, with Ando’s mastery of using
natural light allowing him to manipulate and express the materiality of his structures, in a
similar way as Tange did with the projecting walls of the town hall in Imabari.
We see in both examples similarities between the younger generation and Tange, showing
that Tange’s works were very much forerunners of modern Japanese architecture.
I also strongly believe it is worth noting recent events, in the case of the 2020 Summer
Olympics, set to be held in Tokyo. Tange’s influence can be seen in the organisation of the
planned construction and its parallels with the 1960 Tokyo Plan. Tange’s design for mass
residential areas are comparable with the plans for the Olympic Village, and have even been
located close to the harbour, an area which Tange believed needed regeneration and
reclamation from the defunct factories it bore through the mid-20th century (as can be seen in
Figure 2.1). Alternatively, and perhaps controversially, Tokyo had planned to retrofit
Tange’s existing Olympic Stadiums from 1964, with Zaha Hadid Architects poised to be the
designers. However, as of July 2015, the UK-based architectural practice were removed from
their position amid protest from various Japanese architects, including Fumihiko Maki, over
the concept of changing Tange’s design: a testament to the respect that Tange and his
Olympic Stadiums have gained.
15 | P a g e
REFERENCES
CHAPTER 1
1 Seo, Kyung Wook. “Asian Architecture and Open Building”. An Introduction to
Architectural History and Theory. Northumbria University. Lipman Building,
Newcastle-upon-Tyne. 23 Feb 2017. Lecture.
2 Ishimoto, Yasuhiro and Kenzo Tange. Katsura: Tradition and Creation in Japanese
Architecture Redesigned Edition. Yale University Press Ltd., London, 1972. p. 24.
3 Shirai, Yoko Hsueh. “Haniwa Warrior (Article)”. Khanacademy.org. Khana
Academy. n.d. Web. 24 Apr. 2017, 13:32
4 Kultermann, Udo and Kenzo Tange. Kenzo Tange: 1946-1969: Architecture and
Urban Design. Pall Mall Press, London, 1970. p. 88.
5 Ibid. p. 78
6 Ibid. p. 106.
CHAPTER 2
1 Seo, Kyung Wook. “Asian Architecture and Open Building”. An Introduction to
Architectural History and Theory. Northumbria University. Lipman Building,
Newcastle-upon-Tyne. 23 Feb 2017. Lecture.
2 Denison, Edward. 30 Second Architecture. Ivy Press, London, 2013. p. 114.
3 Goldhagen, Sarah Williams and Réjean Legault. Anxious Modernisms:
Experimentation in Postwar Architecture Culture. Canadian Centre for Architecture,
Montréal, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 2000. p. 280.
16 | P a g e
4 Fazio, Michael, Marian Moffett and Lawrence Wodehouse. A World History of
Architecture Third Edition. Laurence King Publishing, London, 2013. p. 515.
5 Denison, Edward. 30 Second Architecture. Ivy Press, London, 2013. p. 114.
6 “Kenzo Tange”. architectuul.com. Architectuul. n.d. Web. 25 April 2017, 14:13
7 Cattermole, Paul. Architectural Excellence: 500 Iconic Buildings. Compendium
Publishing Ltd., London, 2008. p. 436
CONCLUSION
1 Pollock, Naomi. Jutaku: Japanese Houses. Phaidon Press Ltd., London, 2015. p. 11.
2 Ibid. p. 6.
17 | P a g e
BIBLIOGRAPHY
“Fumihiko Maki: 1993 Laureate”. pritzkerprize.com. The Pritzker Architecture Prize. n.d.
Web. 7 May 2017, 20:32.
“Kenzo Tange”. architectuul.com. Architectuul. n.d. Web. 25 Apr 2017 14:13.
“Kenzo Tange”. praemiumimperiale.org. Praemium Imperiale. n.d. Web. 26 Apr 2017 15:53.
“Kenzo Tange: 1987 Laureate”. pritzkerprize.com. The Pritzker Architecture Prize. n.d. Web.
24 Apr 2017, 17:51.
“Kenzo Tange Facts”. yourdictionary.com. Your Dictionary. n.d. Web. 5 May 2017, 20:26.
“Kenzo Tange Japanese Architect”. britannica.com. Encyclopaedia Britannica. n.d. Web. 26
Apr 2017 15:21.
“Kurashiki City Hall”. greatbuildings.com. The Architecture Week. n.d. Web. 5 May 2017,
20:03
“Paris Voisin, Paris, France, 1925”. Fondationlecorbusier.fr. Fondation Le Corbusier. n.d.
Web. 25 Apr 2017 17:53.
“St Mary’s Cathedral”. Tokyo.catholic.jp. Archdiocese of Tokyo. n.d. Web. 25 Apr 2017
12:43
“Tadao Ando: 1995 Laureate”. pritzkerprize.com. The Pritzker Architecture Prize. n.d. Web.
7 May 2017, 21:01.
“The Osaka World Exhibition 1970”. site.expo2000.de. The History of World Exhibitions.
n.d. 24 Apr 2017, 14:51
Campbell-Dollaghan, Kelsey. “Tokyo’s Clever Plan to Reuse 1964 Olympic Stadiums for the
2020 Games”. gizmodo.com. Gizmodo. 9 Sept 2013. Web. 6 May 2017, 22:29.
18 | P a g e
Cattermole, Paul. Architectural Excellence: 500 Iconic Buildings. Compendium Publishing
Ltd., London, 2008.
Chong, Doryun. Tokyo: 1955-1970: A New Avant-Garde. The Museum of Modern Art, New
York, 2012
Cooper, Graham. Project Japan: Architecture and Art Media Edo to Now. The Images
Publishing Group Pty Ltd, Victoria, 2009.
Crouch, Christopher. Modernism in art, design and architecture. Macmillan Press Ltd.,
London, 1999.
Denison, Edward. 30 Second Architecture. Ivy Press, London, 2013.
Fazio, Michael, Marian Moffett and Lawrence Wodehouse. A World History of Architecture
Third Edition. Laurence King Publishing, London, 2013.
Goldhagen, Sarah Williams and Réjean Legault. Anxious Modernisms: Experimentation in
Postwar Architecture Culture. Canadian Centre for Architecture, Montréal, Massachusetts
Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 2000.
Howarth, Dan. “Japan scraps Zaha Hadid’s Tokyo 2020 Olympic Stadium”. dezeen.com.
Dezeen. 17 July 2015. Web. 7 May 2017, 21:27.
Ishimoto, Yasuhiro and Kenzo Tange. Katsura: Tradition and Creation in Japanese
Architecture Redesigned Edition. Yale University Press Ltd., London, 1972.
Kehl, James. “Metabolism and the Unit”. jkehl.com. n.p. n.d. Web. 25 Apr 2017, 11:53.
Kultermann, Udo and Kenzo Tange. Kenzo Tange: 1946-1969: Architecture and Urban
Design. Pall Mall Press, London, 1970.
19 | P a g e
Meech, Julia. Frank Lloyd Wright and the Art of Japan: The Architect’s Other Passion. Harry
N Abrams Incorporated, New York, 2001.
Nakamori, Yasafumi. Katsura Picturing Modernism in Japanese Architecture Photographs by
Ishimoto Yasuhiro. Museum Of Fine Arts, Houston, 2010.
Pollock, Naomi. Jutaku: Japanese Houses. Phaidon Press Ltd., London, 2015.
Roberts, Nate. “Communist Architecture of Skopje, Macedonia – A Brutal, Modern, Cosmic,
Era”. yomadic.com. Yomadic, 6 May 2013. Web. 26 Apr 2017 14:44.
Seo, Kyung Wook. “Asian Architecture and Open Building”. An Introduction to
Architectural History and Theory. Northumbria University. Lipman Building, Newcastle-
upon-Tyne. 23 Feb 2017. Lecture.
Schalke, Meike. “The Architecture of Metabolist. Inventing a Culture of Resilience”.
mdpi.com. Multidisciplinary Publishing Institute, 13 June 2014. Web. 25 Apr 2017, 12:04.
Schittich, Christain. In Detail: Japan: Architecture, Constructions, Ambiances. Birkhäuser,
Basel, 2002.
Shirai, Yoko Hsueh. “Haniwa Warrior (Article)”. khanacademy.org. Khana Academy. n.d.
Web. 24 Apr. 2017, 13:32
Slessor, Catherine. “The Unrealised Vision for Japan’s Future”. architectural-review.com.
The Architectural Review, 31 October 2011. Web. 25 Apr 2017, 12:07.
Watkin, David. A History of Western Architecture 4th Edition. Laurence King Publishing,
London, 2005.