Kenneth Rogoff presentation to UN Second Committee · • The integration of India and China ......
Transcript of Kenneth Rogoff presentation to UN Second Committee · • The integration of India and China ......
Kenneth Rogoff, Harvard University
1
Kenneth RogoffHarvard University
Globalization and Interdependence
Speech to the Second Committee of the UN General Assembly
New YorkOctober 9, 2006
Kenneth Rogoff, Harvard University
2
Overview• Introduction to major economic themes on
economic globalization and interdependence that the Second Committee of the UN General Assembly may wish to consider
• In conclusions, some areas where the UN has been particularly effective (including especially its emphasis on broader measures of well being), and other areas (including advocacy of unconditional aid) where more nuance may be helpful.
Kenneth Rogoff, Harvard University
3
Today’s globalization has much in common with previous eras
• Technological change– Laying of first transatlantic cable in 1858– Development of railroads– Improvements in shipping– More broadly, industrial revolution
• Mass migration of people and ideas• Inequality deepens
– Across countries– Within countries
Kenneth Rogoff, Harvard University
4
Figure 4. GDP (per capita, PPP weighted): 1970-2004
100
150
200
250
300
350
1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000
Advanced Economies
Emerging Markets
Emerging (excluding China and India)
Other Developing Economies
Divergent global income trends
Top 10% Getting Rising Share of Income in US and elsewhere
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%19
17
1922
1927
1932
1937
1942
1947
1952
1957
1962
1967
1972
1977
1982
1987
1992
1997
2002
Shar
e (in
%),
excl
udin
g ca
pita
l gai
ns
Source: Rogoff, 2006, from Piketty and Saez data set
Kenneth Rogoff, Harvard University
6
Parallels go back much earlier
• Roman empire (Bernanke)• Discovery of the New World• Rapid integration after
Napoleonic Wars
Kenneth Rogoff, Harvard University
7
How is modern era different?
• PACE of globalization unprecedented (global merchandise trade now over 20% of income vs. 15% in 1990)
• The integration of India and China• Developing countries have been
lending to the rich (Is US borrowing from China the world’s largest foreign aid program?)
-2
-1 .5
-1
-0 .5
0
0 .5
1
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Un ite d S ta te s Eu ro a re a J a pa n Eme rging As ia Oil e xporte rs
Global current account BalancesUS is borrowing 70% of world net savings
Sources: Lane and Milesi-Ferretti (2006); and IMF staff estimates.
Kenneth Rogoff, Harvard University
9
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
1999 2004 2009 2014 2019 2024 2029 2034
Will US fall off the Debt Ladder?
(Net foreign debt to GDP)
Projected U.S. Net Foreign Debt
Brazil 1980
U.S. 2004U.S. 1894
Mexico 1980
Norway 1977
Sweden 1994
Finland 1994
Australia 1996
Ireland 1983
Hypothetical U.S.Debt Trajectory
U.S. 2008
Argentina 2001
Kenneth Rogoff, Harvard University
10
Globalization has proceeded at an accelerated pace the last two
decades, especially post 1995, and especially financial globalization
Kenneth Rogoff, Harvard University
12
Extraordinarily stable period parallel to gold standard era
1860-1913, but better
Kenneth Rogoff, Harvard University
13
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
69 73 77 81 85 89 93 97 01 05
(percent change from a year earlier)
The Great Moderation
World
G7
Kenneth Rogoff, Harvard University
Kenneth Rogoff, Harvard UniversityKenneth Rogoff, Harvard University 1414
Volatility decline is worldwide Volatility decline is worldwide (percentage (percentage std. dev.; medians for each group)std. dev.; medians for each group)
4.597.56Other Developing4.785.45Emerging1.912.54Industrial
Income (σy)
1990s1980s
4.796.34Other Developing4.103.43Emerging1.381.58Industrial
Consumption (σc)
Kose, Prasad, Rogoff and Wei, IMF working paper August 2006
Kenneth Rogoff, Harvard UniversityKenneth Rogoff, Harvard University 15150
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 20060
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
Global Compression: Emerging Market Bond Spreads
Non-Latin
EMBI+(ex. Argentina)
Latin
(basis points)
Kenneth Rogoff, Harvard University
16
The globalization era, especially the last fifteen years, has coincided with spectacular outturns for inflation (well
known) and output stabilization (less well known)
Kenneth Rogoff, Harvard University
177.45.59.912.513.910.9Middle East
6.07.917.1264.2213.188.3Latin America
11.016.280.4675.81.42.9CIS and Mongolia
5.014.436.986.033.721.1Central/E. Europe
3.62.67.310.211.29.0Asia
9.211.019.436.517.416.7Africa
5.26.216.879.137.424.2Developing countries
2.41.92.03.84.08.8Advanced economies
3.83.87.929.216.214.5World
2005-0600-0495-9990-9485-8980-84
Global Fall in Inflation
Kenneth Rogoff, Harvard University
18
Globalization is a topic rich with misleading clichés
• “The World is Flat” (Thomas Friedman) great popular book, but– Is it? Inequality is increasing, not decreasing– Most of output is still very local. Services are
still mostly nontraded and account for 75% of income in rich countries
Kenneth Rogoff, Harvard University
19
Globalization as a polemic• “Globalization” tends to be a
Rorschach test for what ever one thinks about the world.
Kenneth Rogoff, Harvard University
20
No credible evidence to support polemic claims that capital account
openness causes deeper and more frequent crises
• E.g., Rodrik, 1998, Bhagwati, 1998, Stiglitz, 2002.
• Virtually all crises in 1990s, early 2000s could be attributed to fixed exchange rates
(due to the risks emphasized by Obstfeld and Rogoff, 1995)
Kenneth Rogoff, Harvard University
21
Countries cannot hide from economic globalization
• “Energy independence” a dangerous fallacy
• In today’s globalized world, diversity of supply is a better concept– Winston Churchill and decision to use oil
for Royal Navy in WW I (Yergin)
Kenneth Rogoff, Harvard University
22
Value of Unilateral Trade Liberalization
• Farm subsidies and agricultural tariffs in rich countries are a huge problem, costing developing countries billions of dollar each year
• But if one reads the fine print in IMF, WTO, and World Bank studies, one sees that most developing countries lose far more form the barriers they erect to foreign goods.
Kenneth Rogoff, Harvard University
23
What about financial globalization?
• Overwhelming weight of evidence suggests that trade integration is beneficial (Rodrik 2002 is a contrarian view)
• More debate on financial globalization• New view: Indirect POTENTIAL benefits
of financial globalization far outweigh direct benefits (Rogoff et al, 2006)– Macro stability, transparency, governance
Kenneth Rogoff, Harvard University
24
UN’s growing role
• World peace is the most important foundation of economic growth, although the two are self-reinforcing
• Globalization also leads to faster spread of disease, need for coordination, transparency
• Other externalities such as climate change
Kenneth Rogoff, Harvard University
25
War Deaths per Million Persons, 1820-2000
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
1820 -29
1830 -39
1840 -49
1850 -59
1860 -69
1870 -79
1880 -89
1890 -99
1900 -09
1910 -19
1920 -29
1930 -39
1940 -49
1950 -59
1960 -69
1970 -79
1980 -89
1990 -99
YearsNotes: Bars indicate total number of deaths from intra-, inter-, and extra-state war per decade, divided by world population mid-decade. (2004) for war dates and deaths and United Nations Population Division (1999) for population.
Rogoff, 2006, Okun lectures, Yale University
Kenneth Rogoff, Harvard University
26
Data, Statistics and Analysis
• Human Development Report and related regional publications are enormously helpful, also in emphasizing importance of measures of well being other than GDP
• Transparency is central to institutional development (central banks as a canonical example)
Kenneth Rogoff, Harvard University
27
Need to resist tempting but misleading polemics
• Trade: Most countries citizens suffer far more from the trade barriers their own governments have erected than from foreign barriers (Britain and repeal of the corn laws in the 1840s)
• Aid: Massive aid transfers are morally compelling but if they need to be intermediated by institutionally frail governments, they can be counterproductive. – Example of microfinance and why aid may work in the
small but less well in the large.
Kenneth Rogoff, Harvard University
28
Conclusion• Modern globalization is similar to earlier
eras but faster, and with some important differences, particularly relationships between rich and developing countries, explosion of finance
• Better global governance essential– Halcyon era of globalization from 1800-1913
did not end well because old security arrangements did not adjust to new economic realities.