Ken Moritz and Bo Goode NAVAIR PMA-275 18 January 2004 V-22 International NAVY-INDUSTRY...
-
Upload
clementine-haynes -
Category
Documents
-
view
216 -
download
0
Transcript of Ken Moritz and Bo Goode NAVAIR PMA-275 18 January 2004 V-22 International NAVY-INDUSTRY...
Ken Moritz and Bo GoodeNAVAIR PMA-27518 January 2004
V-22International
NAVY-INDUSTRY INTERNATIONAL DIALOG
Slide 2
The V-22and the
War onTerrorism
The V-22and the
War onTerrorism
Slide 3
Forces - Afghanistan [Prevent](without V-22)
KC-135
C-17 (2)
KC-135KC-135
KC-135
KC-135
C-5 (3)
C-5 (3)
KC-135 KC-135
KC-135
KC-135
2/75th
Rangers(100)
DOE Tech(10)
5th SFG(12)
AC-130 (3)
Physical security risk: = high= moderate= low
OPSEC considerations: = moderate profile = high profile
• 3 C-5s, helicopter teardown at Taegu
• 19 aircraft through Kadena
B-1 (3) MH-53M (4)
MH-47E (4)
MC-130H (3)
MC-130E (5)
Complex; Multiple Failure NodesComplex; Multiple Failure Nodes
Slide 4
KC-135
2/75th Rangers
(100)
DOETech (10)
5th SFG(12)
CV-22 (7)
Physical security risk: = high= moderate= low
OPSEC considerations: = moderate profile = high profile
Forces - Afghanistan [Prevent](with V-22)
KC-135
KC-135
C-17 (2) B-1 (3)
AC-130 (3)
KC-135
KC-135
MC-130H (3)
Simpler and More Likely to SucceedSimpler and More Likely to Succeed
Scenario Prevent 1 Support Costs Afghanistan
$388,035 $388,035 $2,307,342 $1,852,165
$6,846,330 $2,171,621 $610,801
+ + = $ 3,083,412
+ = $9,017,951
Total Air Costs $2,800,901$13,167,494
$566,131$337,935
(Not actual number of tankers) (Not actual number of tankers)
V-22 Multi-Mission Applications for the UK
Final ReportSeptember, 1999
THE TILTROTOR TEAM
Tilt-rotor Characteristics RequiredAdditional Missions
The basic V-22 airframe, with the appropriate mission kits or system modifications, is suitable for all of the eight additional missions which were examined, but not modelled.
The basic V-22 airframe, with the appropriate mission kits or system modifications, is suitable for all of the eight additional missions which were examined, but not modelled.
AttributeAirborne
Early Warning
Electronic Warfare
Command and Control
Air-to-Air Refueler
Logistic Support
Strategic Self-
Deployment
Combat Search and
Rescue
Special Operations
V/STOL (sea and land basing) 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2
Fast climb/descent 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 2
Fast cruise 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Fixed wing loiter 2 2 2 1 0 0 2 2
Mid-mission hover 1 1 2 1 2 0 2 2
Long range/endurance 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
In-flight refuel 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 2
Internal volume/payload 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
External lift/payload 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 1
Mission System Requirements
None (standard design airframe) X
Modular mission kit X X X X
Dedicated installation X X X X X
Enhanced DAS 1 1 1 0 0 0 2 2
Importance to Mission (2 = Essential, 1 = Desireable, 0 = Not Relevant)
THE TILTROTOR TEAM
Slide 9
Multi Mission Capability
• ASW– Large area search
– Small area localization
• Airborne mine countermeasures
• AEW
• Search and Rescue – Peacetime and combat
– 805 nm range (MV/HV mission)
• Command & Control
• NATO Reaction Force
• In Flight Refueling (tanker)
– At 600 nm radius, give away 2,500 lbs
– At 200 nm radius, give away 16,500 lbs
• COD/VOD/VERTREP
– 24 personnel
– 15,000 lbs cargo
– 20,000 lbs internal
• Special Operations
– Single aircraft ops
– Choice of USMC and SOCOM
Slide 10Public Web Site: http://pma275.navair.navy.mil
Slide 11
Slide 12
Take-Away
• Breaking the paradigm “It’s not a typical Helicopter, it’s a Tiltrotor”
– Flight characteristics better than a conventional Helo
– Significant increase in response time, survivability & maintainability
– Unit cost slightly higher than conventional Helo but yields returns in
capabilities + support footprint + manpower = lower operational cost
• Reduce Type Model Series and gain
– Multi-mission platform optimizes V-22 saving over life cycle
– Mission support structure optimized (manpower, facilities & other platforms)
– Interoperability with NATO and coalition partners
– Cooperative development program opportunities
– Support structure commonality