KEKB Upgrade - HEPHY · KEKB Upgrade. 3 ~1 km in diameter Mt. Tsukuba KEKB Belle 8 GeV electrons on...

29
The SuperKEKB Project Christoph Schwanda, Vienna representing the Super KEKB collaboration SuperB Workshop LAL, Orsay, February 15-18, 2009

Transcript of KEKB Upgrade - HEPHY · KEKB Upgrade. 3 ~1 km in diameter Mt. Tsukuba KEKB Belle 8 GeV electrons on...

The SuperKEKB ProjectChristoph Schwanda, Vienna

representing the Super KEKB collaboration

SuperB WorkshopLAL, Orsay,February 15-18, 2009

KEKB Upgrade

3

~1 km in diameter

Mt. Tsukuba

KEKB

Belle

8 GeV electrons on3.5 GeV positrons

• Ecm = 10.58 GeV ( Y(4S) resonance )

• Lpeak = 1.712 x 1034 cm-2s-1 (Nov-15, 2006)

4

Luminosity history

Belle will have ~1/ab (~1 billion BB events)by the end of data taking in March 2010

5

From KEKB to SuperKEKB

Stored currents:1.7 / 1.4 A (e+ / e- KEKB)

9.4 / 4.1 A (SuperKEKB)

Beam-beam parameter:0.059 (KEKB)

>0.24 (SuperKEKB)

Vertical at IP:6.5 / 5.9 mm (LER/HER KEKB)

3.0 / 3.0 mm (SuperKEKB)

Increase luminosity from 1.7x1034 cm-2s-1 (KEKB)

to 8x1035 cm-2s-1 (SuperKEKB)

6

7

15

179

40

31

178

Cost(oku-yen M$)

x2-4Higher beam-beam parameterCrab cavities

x3High currentMore RF and

cooling systems

If not x0.75Reduce emittance of

injected e+ beame+ damping ring

x2Smaller *New IR

x1.5Enable high current

reduce electron cloudNew beam pipes

LuminosityEffect

preliminary

8

9

10

11

12

Belle upgrade

14

The Belle detector

μ / KL detection

14/15 lyr. RPC+Fe

CsI(Tl) 16X

0

Si vtx. det. 3(4) lyr. DSSD

SC solenoid 1.5T

8 GeV e

3.5 GeV e+

Aerogel Cherenkov cnt. n=1.015~1.030

Central Drift Chamber

small cell +He/C2H5

TOF counter

15

Beam background

The upgraded detector must be ableto handle (at least) 20x times more beamground

16

From Belle to sBelle

• (At least) maintain the current Belleperformance in harsh backgroundenvironment

• Baseline design

– SuperKEKB Letter of Intent (LoI)KEK Report 2004-4

– sBelle Design Study ReportKEK Report 2008-7

17

Particle ID:ring imaging Cherenkov devices(TOP in the barrel, ARICH in the forward)

Baseline design

Silicon:2 lyrs pixel,4 lyrs DSSD

Drift chamber:smaller cell size

Em. calorimeter:wave form samplingpure CsI (endcaps)

Muons, neutrals:scintillator strips (endcaps)

18

DEPFET pixel layers

• Build by collaboration around MPIMunich (http://www.depfet.org/)

• 2 pixel layers close to beam pipe(r > 1.3cm)

• Pixel size 50 μm x 75 μm

• Fully depleted sensitive volume

• Row-wise readout

• Sensor thinning (50 μm)S/N 20-40 @ 50 μm

• Radiation hard

DEpleted P-channel FET

19

Silicon strip layers

• Front-end chip: APV25(originally developed for CMS)

• 6 consecutive time samples forhit time reconstruction

• Chip-on-sensor for outer layers(origami module with thinnedAPV25)

• DSSD manufacturer? zylon rib

APV25 cooling pipe

4-layer kapton hybrid

integrated fanout(or: second metal)

DSSD

single-layer flex wrapped to p-side

20

TOP counter for barrel PID

• Cherenkov photons reflected inside quartz radiator

• Cherenkov image reconstructed from one coordinateand precise timing

• Successful test of realistic prototype in June 2009

IP

Forward Backward

Focus mirror(sphere, r=5000)

32.8o~123.5o

47.8o

R=1180z=1830 z=1070 z=-780

5mm

40cm

2cm

MCP-PMT

Quartz + support jig

Focusing mirror

2cm

40cm

mirror(R=5m)

21

ARICH for forward PID

• Proximity focussing RICH

• /K separation from 1.5 to

4 GeV/c

• Inside axial magnetic field

• Test at KEK Fuji beamline(2 GeV e-)

– Cherenkov ring observed

– 6 p.e./track

– 13.2 mrad resolution

Aerogel radiator

Position sensitive devicewith B=1.5Tesla

Cherenkov

photon

200mm

n~1.05

Schedule

23

A.Suzuki(KEK DG)Jan-4, 2008

24

JFY2009 JFY2010 JFY2011

Worst ScenarioWorst Scenario

Super Super

Best ScenarioBest Scenario

Best ScenarioBest ScenarioGovernment Government

Review Review

Council Council

Full BudgetFull Budget

Proposal Proposal ConstructionConstruction

Good Scenario Good Scenario

R&D BudgetR&D Budget

Proposal Proposal Super-KEKBSuper-KEKB

R&D R&D

Better Scenario Better Scenario

SupplementSupplement

Budget Budget

SupplementSupplement

Budget Budget

Feb-9, 2009

25

Summary and conclusions

• We believe that we can build a Super Bfactory by upgrading the existing KEKBaccelerator and Belle detector

• We are now completing the R&D phase andaim at submitting the TDR soon

• There is great interest in our project in thecommunity, and new groups have joined ourefforts

• The SuperKEKB collaboration is emerging --we had our first collaboration meeting Dec.10-12, 2008 at KEK

• KEK DG has submitted a funding request toMEXT, and we are optimistic about theoutcome

Backup

27

Machine parameters of SuperKEKB

28

Luminosity prospect

29