Katharine Ku
Transcript of Katharine Ku
42 Years Experience of
Technology Licensing
Katharine Ku
Stanford University
November 15, 2012
Philosophy
• Do what’s “best for the technology”• Foster good industrial relations• Be a business-driven office, not
legally driven• Plant as many seeds as possible
History
• Started in 1970• Approx. 8,300 cumulative disclosures• Approx. 3,000 active cases• Executed over 3600 licenses• Approx. 1200 active licenses
Notable Stanford Inventions1970 – OTL Established
1971 - FM Sound Synthesis ($22.9M)
1974 – Recombinant DNA ($255M)
1981 – Phycobiliproteins ($46.4M), Fiber Optic Amplifier ($48.4M), MINOS ($4.1M)
1984 – Functional Antibodies ($318.9M)
1990-1992 – DSL ($29.6M)
1996 – Improved Hypertext Searching (GoogleTM)($337M)
2013 – the next big thing ???
1987 – Selective Amplification of Polynucleotides ($20.3M)
1994 – In vivo bioluminescent imaging ($7.2M)
1993 – Microarrays ($2M), MIMO for Wireless Broadcast ($0.12M)
2004 – Refocus Photography ($0.15M)
The upside...
• OTL has generated ~$1.47B in cumulative gross royalties
• $920M were three big inventions• Over $1.2 billion stayed at
Stanford/inventors• OTL has given $46.2M to the
Research Incentive Fund
Sobering Statistics
• 3/9300 is a BIG WINNER (these three inventions generated 67% of the cumulative income)
• 20 cases generated $5M or more• 68 cases generated $1M or more in
cumulative royalties• $17.6M in unlicensed inventory• The University cannot count on royalties
for university operating expenses
1970’s
• First year $55,000• 50-70 disclosures a year• Inventions of note:
• Music chip• FACS• Hybridomas
• Staff of 3
1980’s• Dramatic increase in revenue
– DNA cloning invention– Software– HIV, the “web”
• Broke even after 15 years• Biotech emerging • equity discussions: conflicts of
interest• 622 licenses/staff of 18/$14M
1990’s
• Change in patent policy• New view of equity• Google, DSL technologies disclosed• Wireless inventions appearing• DNA patent expired• Income ~$25M-$61M-$40M• Staff of 24, $3M patent expenses
2000’s
• Google IPO• Lots of start-ups at the beginning;
the crash• Functional antibody royalties start• Interest in online education begins• Income growing ~$65M, 33 staff• $4M in patent expenses
Present
• Innovation is key– StartX, Biodesign, SPARK,
Entrepreneurial classes
• Acceleration to industry • Rise of China• Income: $76.7M, staff of 40, $8M
patent expenses
Future
• More pressure to patent/more expenses
• Pressure to do deals faster/streamline
• More interest by entrepreneurs to start companies
• Income cliff
Stanford “Best Practices”
• Stay centered– Education and research come first
• Do what’s best for the technology– Don’t chase the $$$
• The dollars will come if you do a good job
• Plant as many seeds as possible– Some will bear fruit