Kaan noo eSSttaatte EEnnvviirroonmmeenntt … noo eSSttaatte EEnnvviirroonmmeenntt SSeeccttoorr 2013...

KKaannoo SSttaattee EEnnvviirroonnmmeenntt SSeeccttoorr

2013 - 2015 Medium Term Sector Strategy

Report Prepared By Sector Planning Team

2

Foreword

The preparation of Medium Term Sector Strategies is part of a larger policy; strategy and

corporate planning process in Kano State, which was done in April-October, 2013. The

government has prepared a longer-term policy document, the Kano State Development

Plan to guide the state’s medium-term development aspirations over 2011-2015. The

Kano State Development Plan communicates the state government’s priorities that will

be implemented by sectors in order to achieve sustainable development. Pursuant to the

preparation of the Kano State Development Plan, sectors were mandated to embark on

an exercise of developing sector strategic plans that will streamline priorities, institutional

mechanisms and arrangements, financing of the identified priorities and the monitoring

and evaluation frameworks that will guide the implementation of the Kano State

Development Plan over the stated period.

The aim is to improve the connection between policy making, planning and medium-term

budgeting, especially so as to facilitate better implementation of the state government’s

policies as contained in the Kano State Development Plan and Vision 20: 2020. Thus,

this Kano State Environment Sector Medium Term Sector Strategy seeks to articulate

the main priorities and strategies that will be undertaken by the sector over the period

2013 - 2015, in order to contribute to the realization of the Kano State Development Plan

goals. The Environment Sector Medium Term Sector Strategy will therefore chart the

course for the sector’s contribution to the state’s economic growth. The implementation

of the Medium Term Sector Strategy will ensure that sustainable use of environmental

goods and services and rational utilization of natural resources guarantees benefits to

present and future generations.

However, the effective implementation of the Medium Term Sector Strategy will require

participation of sectors that extend beyond the environment sector. Sectors such as

Agriculture, Commerce and Industry and Health will be crucial, particularly in

consideration of the role they play in the state environmental management. This is in line

with the national goals clearly elaborated in the national policy on environment that

highlight the cross cutting status of environment in national planning.

Therefore, to facilitate the implementation of the environment sector Medium Term

Sector Strategy will require a sector wide approach which will be pursued through a

forum constituted from broad stakeholder partnerships of public institutions on the one

hand, and private sector, Non-Governmental Organizations and development partners;

on the other hand. The broad stakeholder participation will feature prominently in key

sector support activities including financing for the sector, institutional coordination and

capacity enhancement and monitoring and evaluation.

I am pleased to share with you this document, which has been developed through a

highly participatory process and therefore, is an expression of collective commitment to

3

sustainable development from key state stakeholders. I am positive that the level of

commitment and support witnessed in developing the document, at both personal as

well as institutional levels; will be demonstrated throughout the period of implementation

of the strategic plan.

Alhaji Abdullahi Abbas

Hon. Commissioner

Ministry of Environment

4

Contents Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................... 5 Abbreviations .................................................................................................................. 7 Chapter One: Introduction ............................................................................................... 9

1.1 Aims and Objectives of the Document ............................................................... 9 1.2 Summary of the Process Used .......................................................................... 9 1.3 Summary of Conclusions .................................................................................. 9 1.4 Outline of the Document.................................................................................. 10

Chapter Two: The Sector and Policy in the State .......................................................... 11 2.1 A Brief Introduction to the State ....................................................................... 11 2.2 The Economy: ................................................................................................. 11 2.3 Investment Climate ......................................................................................... 12 2.4 The current situation in the sector ................................................................... 12 2.5 Sector Policy ................................................................................................... 13

Chapter Three: The Development of Sector Strategy ................................................ 15 3.1 Major Strategic Challenges ............................................................................. 15 3.2 Resource Constraints ...................................................................................... 15 3.3 Contributions from the Sector Partners ........................................................... 15 3.4 Programme Connections between Sector MDAs ............................................ 16 3.5 Outline of Key Strategies ................................................................................. 17 3.6 Justification ..................................................................................................... 17 3.7 Results Framework ......................................................................................... 18 3.8 Responsibilities and Operational Plan .................................................................. 26

Chapter Four: Three Year Expenditure Projections ....................................................... 27 4.1 The Process Used to Make Expenditure Projection ......................................... 27 4.2 Outline Expenditure Projections ...................................................................... 28

Chapter Five: Monitoring and Evaluation ....................................................................... 36 5.1 Monitoring and Evaluation ............................................................................... 36 5.2 Key Performance Indicator .............................................................................. 37 5.3 Conducting Annual Sector Review .................................................................. 41 5.4 Organisational Arrangements .......................................................................... 41

5

Acknowledgements The knowledge and information shared in this Environment Sector Medium Term Sector

Strategy document was generated with the assistance of a vast number of individuals

and organizations. Organizations that made significant contribution to the preparation

and production of this sector Medium Term Sector Strategy document include the

Ministries of Planning and Budget, Finance, Environment, Water Resources, and the

State Partnership for Accountability, Responsiveness and Capability programme. We

are pleased to acknowledge and appreciate the numerous assistance and significant

contributions rendered by these organizations. We further acknowledge and thank the

Department for International Development and State Partnership for Accountability,

Responsiveness and Capability team for guidance, financial support and articulation of

the document. Our appreciations go to the Kano State Government for the interest and

sustained support to ensure a relevant and purposeful document is produced.

Equally, our thanks go to the many people that made the production of this Medium

Term Sector Strategy document possible including those not listed below. This was a

team effort led by State Partnership for Accountability, Responsiveness and Capability

and their consultants with valuable contributions from the following vital stakeholders

who are members of the MTSS team steering committee:

1 Alh. Abdullahi Abbas Hon. Commissioner Ministry for Environment

2 Alh. Muhammad Badawi Permanent Secretary, Ministry of Environment

3 Dr. Garba Saleh Ahmad Director Ecology & Forestry Min of Environment

4 Lawan Habib Ibrahim Dir. Admin & Gen Services Min of Environment

5 Hashimu Shehu Minjibir Dir. Planning, Research and Statistics, Min of Environment

6 Ali Dauda Coordinator Kano State Afforestation Programme

7 Musa Shu’aibu DSPC Kano State Afforestation Programme

8 Ibrahim Malami Min of Environment

9 Sunusi Muhd Isa Fagge C.M Officer Kano State Afforestation Programme

10 Engr. Abdullahi Shehu Bichi MD, Refuse Management and Sanitation Board

11 Abubakar R. Danhassan Dir. Sanitation, Refuse Management and Sanitation Board

12 Dr. Ado H. Bello Provost, School of Hygiene, Kano

13 Hassan Danbappa MD, Sustainable Kano Project

14 Suleiman Abubakar Fagge Kano Zoological Garden

15 Ahmad Rufa’i Yaro Kano State House of Assembly

6

16 Bello Imam Min of Environment

17 Engr.Mustapha Muhammad Dir, Pollution Control Min of Environment

18 Ibrahim Lawal Fagge Dep. Dir. Account, Min of Environment

19 Aminu Muhammad Naniya Planning and Monitoring Min of Environment

20 Muktari Bello Kano State Afforestation Programme

21 Bashiru Adamu Planning and Monitoring Min of Environment

Alh. Muhammad Badawi

Permanent Secretary

7

Abbreviations

AESR Annual Environment Sector Review

DFID Department for International Development

DPRS Directorate of Planning Research and Statistics

EnvMIS Environment Management Information System

GDP Gross Domestic Product

IMF International Monetary Fund

IRS Indoor residual Spraying

KNAP Kano State Afforestation Programme

KSDP Kano State Development Pan

LG Local Government

LGAs Local Government Areas

MDAs Ministries Department and Agencies

MoENVT Ministry of Environment

MoPB Ministry of Planning and Budget

MSMEs Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises

MTSS Medium Term Sector Strategy

NGOs Non-Government Organizations

PPP Public Private Partnership

REMASAB Refuse Management and Sanitation Board

SKP Sustainable Kano Programme

SPARC State Partnership for Accountability, Responsiveness and Capability

8

%[

#Y

#Y

#Y

#Y

#Y

#Y

#Y

#Y

#Y

#Y

#Y

#Y#Y

#Y#Y

#Y

#Y

#Y

#Y

#Y

#Y

#Y

#Y

#Y

#Y

#Y

#Y

#Y

#Y

#Y

#Y

#Y

#Y#Y

#Y

#Y

#Y#Y

#Y

#Y #Y

#Y

#Y

#Y

â

RIRIWAI

KANO

KIRU

KABO

ROGO

GAYA

RANO

TOFA

KURA

BICHI

TAKAI

GARKO

WUDIL

F

G

KARAYE

GWARZO

UNGOGO GEZAWA

KOGUNA

AJINGI

ALBASU

KIBIYA

BEBEJI

MADOBI

KUNCHI

BAGWAI

SHANONO

DAKIRAI

SUMAILA

BUNKURE

TSANYAWA

MINJIBIR

DANBATTA

KUMBOTSO

N

D

TUDUN WADA

RAMIN

GADOT

M

GARUN MALAM

DAWAKIN

TOFA

DAWAKIN KUDU

WARAWA

Tiga

Dam

Gari

Dam

R.Chalawa

Jakara

Dam

Tomas

Dam

R. Tamas

W atari

Dam

Kafinchiri

Dam

Ruwan K anya

Dam

Bagauda

Lak e

River/Stream

Forest ReserveRiver,Dam

Dual Carriage Road

Tarred/Laterite RoadRailway Line

Local Government BoundaryState Boundary

â#Y Local Govt Headquater

%[ State Capital

Airport

LEGEND

S

N

EW

20 0 20 40 Kilometers

GWAMMAJAD - DALA

LOCAL GOVERNMENT HEADQUATERS

FAGGE

GWALE

KOFAR KUDU

NASARAWA

UNGUWA UKU

F - FAGGE

G - GWALE

M - MUNICIPAL

N - NASARAWA

T - TARAUNI

ADMINISTRATIVE MAP OF KANO STATE

Consultant - Mr. Tushar Kanti RayGIS Work - Geoenvitech Research & Consultancy Services Pvt. Ltd., Bhubaneswar, India Email- [email protected]

9

Chapter One: Introduction

1.1 Aims and Objectives of the Document

Environment sector Medium Term Sector Strategy (MTSS) is derived from the Kano

State Development Plan (KSDP) 2013-2015 which highlights the state government’s

priorities for socio-economic development, sets appropriate goals and targets and

proposes strategies that will ‘transform Kano State back to its leading role amongst

states of the federation in most spheres of human endeavour’. In response to this

overarching policy thrust of government the environment sector MTSS 2013-2015 seeks

to achieve sustainable development in the state, and in particular to protect the

environment from degradation, loss of productive land and environment pollution.

The overall aims and objectives include:

Better understanding of the links between MTSS, long term plans and annual

budgets as envisaged in the KSDP;

Clear understanding of environmental problems in Kano and develop three year

MTSS;

Cost the prioritised initiatives with indicative envelopes.

1.2 Summary of the Process Used

Environment sector MTSS was prepared between May to November 2013. The process

involves three different stages; (1) Review of environment sector policies and existing

commitments at Abuja (2) development of medium term strategy and result chain at

Kaduna and series of other workshops that deliberated on refining and review the

strategies, performance indicators, costing and phasing in Kano (3) Validation and

documentation workshop. Each stage involves workshops with key stake holders (sector

planning team).

All Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs) within the sector and other relevant

stakeholders were involved. However the preparation of the MTSS was faced with some

challenges such as inadequate data, staff capacity and funding.

1.3 Summary of Conclusions

The MTSS focussed mainly on five key strategic areas that were linked with the KSDP

and the issues discussed/generated during the preparations. These are:

To conserve, protect and enhance the ecosystems and ecological processes;

To halt and reverse desertification, soil degradation and mitigate the impact of

climate change;

To ensure proper environmental sanitation, waste management and pollution

control;

To ensure communities better manage their own environment;

10

To strengthen institutional capacity for effective environmental management.

1.4 Outline of the Document

The MTSS has two main components i.e. the MTSS narrative and the logical framework.

The narrative component has five chapters.

Chapter one provides the introduction, aims and objectives, summary of the

process, summary and conclusions;

Chapter two describe brief introduction of the state, current situation in the sector

and sector policy;

Chapter three discussed the major challenges, resource constraints and

contribution from partner’s justification, results framework and responsibilities

and operational plan;

Chapter four deliberated on development of sector strategy, three-year

expenditure projection;

Chapter five discussed on monitoring and evaluation that means identified

sources of data against the results framework, conducting annual sector review,

and organisational arrangements. The logical framework on the other hand is a

template that describes the strategic goals, objectives, programmes, projects,

activities and three year costs in such a way that activities can be seen to

contribute to the achievement of individual goals.

11

Chapter Two: The Sector and Policy in the State 2.1 A Brief Introduction to the State

Kano lies between latitude 130 north and 110 north in the south and longitude 80 degree

in the west and 100 degree in the east and covers approximately 20,760 sq. km or 2.2 %

of Nigeria’s land mass. The state is the most populous of Nigeria’s 36 states1. Current

population is estimated at approximately 12 million up from 9.4 million with figures

expected to rise up to more than 15 million by 2020. The temperature usually ranges

between a maximum of 33.0 degree centigrade and a minimum of 15.80 degree

centigrade. Although during the dry season; it falls to as low as 10 degree centigrade. It

has two seasonal periods, which consist of four to five months of wet season, and a long

dry season lasting from October to April while the vegetation is semi-arid Sudan

savannah. This makes the state prone to desertification.

2.2 The Economy:

Kano is the commercial and investment hub of Northern Nigeria and third largest non-oil

& gas economy in Nigeria, with a Growth Domestic Product (GDP) of approximately $15-

19 billion. Economy is driven largely by commerce, manufacturing and subsistence

agriculture-the dominant activity, with up to 70% of the population engaged directly or

indirectly. Informal sector is strong and diverse, with numerous Micro Small and Medium

Enterprises (MSMEs) across all economic activities, and contributing approximately 60-

70% of output and employment.

Kano has historically been a major commercial and manufacturing centre in the West

African sub-region-even before the incorporation of Nigeria into the European system of

global commerce. In the pre-colonial period, it served as a major entry port and the

southern hub of the trans-Saharan trade route for centuries. In the 1950’s and 1960’s,

Kano provided the bulk of Northern Nigeria’s export products of groundnuts, cotton,

hides and skins. The famous groundnut pyramids were a national emblem portraying

wealth and self-reliance. Throughout the 1970’s and 1980’s, Kano grew to become

Nigeria’s 2nd largest industrial and commercial centre with over 450 medium-large scale

industries. Almost all branches of manufacturing activities were registered: textiles and

apparels, plastic and rubber, paper and paper products, leather, food and beverages,

chemicals, metals and basic industrial products etc.

Since the mid 1990’s however, the economy has suffered steady decline with loss of

competitiveness within the national economy. Industrial production and sustained private

sector growth have been severely constrained by an unfavourable investment climate,

characterized by high production costs, cumbersome regulatory environment, general

insecurity and occasional communal strife. The manufacturing sector has been badly hit

also by external forces. Nigeria’s pursuit of International Monetary Fund (IMF)-inspired

structural adjustment policies in the late 1980’s and other poorly designed macro-

1 2006 National population census

12

economic reforms in subsequent years, have adversely affected many enterprises as

they faced intense competition from imported goods.

Today, approximately 70% of the state’s medium and large-scale manufacturing

establishments are non-operational, while the rest have shrunk considerably, operating

at less than 40% capacity. Hardest hit are the textiles, leather, chemicals, plastics, food

& beverages and pharmaceutical sub-sectors. Nearly 40% of closed textile firms in

Nigeria are in Kano. Kano once dubbed: Nigeria’s most celebrated textile exporter is

now more appropriately Nigeria’s-and perhaps Africa’s-most celebrated textile importer.

This has resulted in high rates of unemployment, depressed incomes and low rates of

economic growth.

2.3 Investment Climate

Nigeria is one of the least competitive economies in the world [ranks 127 of 139

countries];2 and performs poorly in terms of the key indicators of ‘Ease of Doing

Business’ [ranks 137 of 183 economies]3. Kano not only shares common business

constraints across the country but also is also acutely affected by them.

Pressing business environment constraints which make business difficult and deter

investment decisions include inadequate infrastructure [power, water supply and roads],

high cost of and limited access to finance, multiple taxation, and smuggling and dumping

of sub-standard goods. Power supply is perhaps the most critical constraint and the

deficit in the power sector has led to the high cost of doing business, loss of

competiveness & business failures. The current demand for power in Kano State stands

at approximately 500MW. The average daily dispatch is much lower at between 80-

100MW, leaving a huge power supply gap of over 400MW.

2.4 The current situation in the sector

Kano State ministry of environment has the responsibility of protecting; saving and

improving upon whole environment of the state. These responsibilities are divided

among the different departments and parastatals under the ministry.

In the metropolitan areas with eight local governments where the population is about

50% of the total population of Kano State, the major environmental problems are; -

1. Solid waste management: With an increase in the population in Kano metropolis,

about 4000-5000 metric tonnes of solid waste is being generated daily;

2. Industrial and domestic waste water: With the total number;

3. Erosion and flood: Every year Kano State experiences flooding, as a result of

drainage blockage and indiscriminate waste disposal into waterways which bring

2 World Economic Forum, Global Competitiveness Report 2011

3 World Bank Doing Business Report 2011

13

about loss of lives and properties. As a result of global warming and

desertification, over six hundred hectares of land was affected by erosion;

4. Inadequate sanitation and hygiene facilities;

5. Pollution of water, air, soil/land and noise;

6. Lack of adequate and drainage systems.

Outside the metropolitan that is within the thirty six (36) Local Government Areas (LGAs)

were the population is scattered the major environmental problem are:

1. Deforestation;

2. Desertification;

3. Loss of biodiversity;

4. Flooding/erosion;

5. Inadequate sanitation and hygiene facilities.

From above, the demand to provide various environmental services for the people is

enormous and financial resources to support it are not enough. This warrants the need

for a very good and efficient planning in order to ensure provision of the much needed

services to the teeming population of the state. In the Refuse Management and

Sanitation Board (REMASAB) for example the 2013 total budget disbursement have not

yet met the requirements demanded. The approved amount is within the range of 30-

50% making it possible to move only 55% of the total waste generated daily. Some of

the major challenges faced by the sector include:

Lack of adherence and implementation of environmental policies and legislations;

Lack of community involvement in all environmental policies/implementation;

Insufficient funds/untimely release of same;

Lack of Gender inclusion and social imbalance;

Lack of awareness of the public on environmental policies;

Difficulty in attitudinal and behavioral changes to environmental issues.

2.5 Sector Policy

Kano State policy on environment is aimed at achieving sustainability in the

management and control of air and water pollution, solid waste, conservation of habitat

and biodiversity (flora and fauna), drought and desertification, floods, erosion and

improved water sources, sanitation and protection of grave yards

The policy objectives are to:

Secure a quality environment that is adequate for good health and wellbeing of

the people;

Conserve and use the environment and natural resources for the benefit of

present and future generations;

Restore, maintain and enhance the ecosystems and ecological processes

essential for the functioning of the biosphere to preserve biological diversity and

14

the principle of optimum sustainable yield in the use of natural resources and

ecosystems;

Encourage individual and community participation in environmental improvement

efforts;

Raise awareness and promote understanding of the essential linkages between

the environment, resources and development.

These are expected to produce the following outcomes:

Improve healthy environment for people, animal and plants;

Sustained and effective disposal of all forms of wastes from the general

environment;

Increased total area under sustainable forest management to 25% of state’s land

mass;

Informed citizenry that is knowledgeable concerning the biophysical environment

and its associated problems, aware of how to help and solve these problems,

and motivated to work toward their solution.

15

Chapter Three: The Development of Sector Strategy

3.1 Major Strategic Challenges

Kano state is committed to an environmental policy that seeks to ensure sustainable

development based on proper utilization and management of the entire environment

which requires that environmental concerns are integrated into major socio – economic

decision making processes and infrastructural development. However the environmental

sector is faced with huge challenges that need to be considered in order to achieve the

set of goal.

1. Inadequate institutional, human and financial resources continue to be a major

contributing factor to the slow rate of implementation of the state program;

2. Non completion of the current draft of state policy on environment;

3. Poor organizational structure and function resulting in poor coordination and

duplication of activities;

4. Inadequate capacity for monitoring, research and development;

5. There is still inadequacy in the level of enforcement of environmental laws and

regulation in the state.

3.2 Resource Constraints

Revenue projection for the sector for the next three years show an increase over the last

three years from a little under four billion to over six billion in 2015. However if the trend

in the previous years is considered one may envisage gaps between the approved

expenditure and actual releases, again there are existing commitments to be

considered. This may all have a strong bearing on what is left over for discretionary

planning.

Another constraint is in the sectors’ capacity to implement policies. As mentioned before

there is the dearth of skilled manpower to deliver environmental services. Shortage of

necessary equipment needed to do this or to monitor and evaluate services.

3.3 Contributions from the Sector Partners

The recent statement by His Excellency the Governor of Kano State, that certain aspects

of environmental services like waste management cannot be shouldered by the

government alone underscores the need for the involvement of various stake holders in

safe guarding the environment and delivery of environmental services.

The government has taken measures to improve internally generated revenue through

different kind of reforms; promoting Public Private Partnership (PPP) so as to expand

investment in key sectors including infrastructure and ensure sustainability and sourcing

of development funding from internal and external sources.

16

Likewise the preparation of the Environment Sector MTSS involves a series of workshop

that engaged the contribution of number of stakeholders. At the sessions policy terrain

was reviewed, MTSS goals and objectives were agreed upon, activities and sub-

activities were identified and prioritisation was made. At other session costing of the sub

activities took place. The last session, the preparation of MTSS narratives and the final

budget of the Environmental sector were forwarded for validation.

The different strategy sessions revealed the following to constitute stakeholders in the

environment sector

1. The general public;

2. Government MDAs (Health, Water, Works etc.);

3. Community based organizations;

4. Non-governmental organizations;

5. Development partners;

6. Organized private sector;

7. Traditional/ Religious leaders.

Still more needs to be done to ensure the involvement of public and civil society in the

sector from the planning process through participating in the planning sessions and

monitoring etc.

3.4 Programme Connections between Sector MDAs

Environment sector MDAs consists of the following:

Ministry of Environment;

Kano State Afforestation Programme (KNAP);

Refuse Management & Sanitation Board;

Sustainable Kano Project; and

School of Hygiene.

While the Ministry of Environment under the leadership of the Honourable Commissioner

and the Permanent Secretary oversees the sectoral policy development and oversight,

the other parastatals under the ministry are charged with the implementation of

environment specific intervention, in addition enhancing the capacity of sector with

adequately skilled human resources from the School of Hygiene.

In addition to its stewardship role, the Ministry of Environment through the departments

of Ecology/Forestry, Planning Research and Statistics and Pollution Control implements

environment services. A number of these projects especially forest conservation and

Pollution Control was listed as the core function of other agency (such as Kano State

Afforestation Programme, Refuse Management & Sanitation Board) under the ministries

underscoring the importance of the issues to be addressed.

17

3.5 Outline of Key Strategies

Sector strategy sessions were convened at different times with a range of stake holders

and technical officers in order to revise the sector strategy. Stake holders include

directors and other technical officers in the ministry supported by the Ministry of Planning

and Budget and the State Partnership for Accountability, Responsiveness and Capability

(SPARC). These strategy sessions were sometimes attended by the permanent

secretary and even the commissioner and lawmakers from the state assembly.

The strategy sessions form forums that come up with ways of how to go about achieving

the goals set out on the policy statement. The forums came up with about nine major

strategies which include:

Conservation of habitat and bio-diversity;

Improvement of water sources and sanitation;

Environmental environment;

Management and control of environmental pollution;

Effective and sustainable waste management;

Control of pests and vectors;

Self-sufficiency in forest products and service;

Reducing drought and desertification;

Flood and erosion control.

The strategies describe what the environment sector is expected to do over a medium

term period. It provided for an improvement over the current annual planning in the

consideration of recurrent implications of capital investments, it for example considers if

additional vehicles for refuse collection are bought, the cost of providing additional staff

and maintenance of the vehicles in subsequent years should be provided for. Again

capital projects that may extend over one year may have their costs spread over the

years until full implementation.

3.6 Justification

Previously, budgets from Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs) are prepared

and capital expenditure with allocation under personnel, overhead and capital

expenditure distributed under economic codes in the first two categories while in the

third categories corresponding code describe projects. This approach however defines

expenditure in the form of inputs (especially as these apply to personnel and overhead),

which means they do not correspond to outputs and outcomes.

We cannot therefore say that a particular input of some kind of human effort is directed

towards the achievement of a particular output. This in turn means that it is hard to

ensure (though internal management) that resources are being applied in an effective

way.

18

The strategies adopted this time shifted towards budgeting against outputs rather than

against inputs i.e. a shift towards program based budgeting. The strategies adopted are

made of programs consisting of inputs and activities aimed at achieving program

outputs, which contribute to the achievement of sector outcomes, all, funnelled into the

progression of policy goals. In this way some programs and some sectors have multiple

positive inputs.

3.7 Results Framework

In the current situation, all MDAS have units charged with monitoring and evaluation

activities. It is now proposed that MTSS monitoring committee should be formed with

each MDA’s monitoring and evaluation officer to serve in the committee under the

leadership of the Director of Planning, Research and Statistics (DPRS) in the Ministry of

Environment (MoEnvt) charged with responsibility of producing the quarterly report. For

the annual sector performance report, most data will come from centralized Environment

Management Information System (EnvMIS), which will be responsible for collecting all

the reports and producing the annual progress report.

The Annual Environment Sector Review (AESR) ensures yearly performance

assessment and complements the budgetary cycle so that informed decisions can be

taken prior to budget preparation. The first review took place in June 2010, prior to the

attempt to develop MTSS plan. It is expected that annual reviews will eliminate the need

for development partners to request separate reviews for individual projects and support

programs. The review covered whole sector performance and will, if necessary, cover all

aspects of annual environmental development, including projects and sub-programs.

19

KANO STATE MTSS GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

OUTPUT AND OUTCOME – ENVIRONMENT MTSS GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

Goal/Objective/Programme/

Project

Impact/Outcome/

Output

Statement

Impact /Outcome /Output

indicator

GOAL 1: TO CONSERVE, PROTECT AND ENHANCE THE ECOSYSTEMS AND

ECOLOGICAL PROCESSES

Objective 1.1: To promote the

expansion and conservation of

flora, fauna and forest estates for

sustained yield

Increase in farm

yield and

improvement in

air quality

10% forest vegetation cover

attained

Programme 1.1.1: Forest estates

enrichment planting schemes

Increased land

area of vegetation

cover and forest

products.

100 hectares of encroached

forest estates planted.

1.1.1.1

Project: Forest

reserves and

Communal Forest

Areas Re-survey and

demarcation Areas

1.1.1.2

Project: Industrial

Plantation /Forest

enrichment Planting

Programme 1.1.2: Bio-diversity

conservation initiative

Increased

composition of

plants and animal

species

2000 seedlings of 10

endangered plant species

planted

Five pairs of five extinct

animal species re-introduced.

1.1.2.1

Project: Semi-arid

zone Flora and fauna

Conservation

1.1.2.2

Project: Multiplication

and re-stocking of

species with low status

Programme 1.1.3: Green Kano

Programme

Roads protected

from erosion and

aesthetic values

of the areas

enhanced.

Km of major roads upgraded

and beautified

10Nos. Parks & gardens

upgraded and beautified

1.1.3.1 Project: Establishment

of parks and gardens.

1.1.3.2 Project:

20


Project

Impact/Outcome/

Output

Statement


indicator

Roadside/avenues tree

plantings scheme

Programme 1.1.4: Forest

protection initiatives

Increased supply

of forest products

180 hectare of forest estate

fenced and upgraded

1.1.4.1

Project: Construction

of fire-traces and patrol

in forest estates and

game reserves

1.1.4.2 Project: Silvio Postural

and Pest control

1.1.4.3

Project: Silvicultural

management of 200km

shelterbelts and forest

estates

GOAL 2: TO HALT AND REVERSE DESERTIFICATION, SOIL DEGRADATION AND

MITIGATE THE IMPACT OF CLIMATE CHANGE

Objective 2.1: To support mass

afforestation and social forestry

practices

Improved

environmental

conditions and

increased forest

products.

Production of 2 million tree

seedlings, establishment of

600ha forest estates and

mobilizing 1,000 private

farmers to participate in

various afforestation planting

models.

Programme 2.1.1: Soil and

degraded land reclamation

Reduced land

degradation

200km shelterbelts and 50ha

of water catchment plantation

established


of 60km shelterbelts

2.1.1.2

Project: Establishment

of

Watershed/catchment

plantations

2.1.1.3 Project: Production of

9million tree seedlings

Programme 2.1.2: Private

Forestry Scheme

Increased

participation of

private people

and their income

300ha of private /communal

forests and 3 new apiaries

established

900 farmers trained on

modern bee keeping

techniques.

2.1.2.1 Project: Private

21


Project

Impact/Outcome/

Output

Statement


indicator

Forestry/Orchard

Development

2.1.2.2 Project Sustainable

Honey production

2.1.2.3 Project Tree planting

campaign

Programme 2.1.3: Annual Tree

Planting Programme

Tree planting and

protection culture

enhanced

1,500,000 seedlings raised,

distributed and planted

2.1.3.1 Project: Tree planting

campaign

Objective 2.2: To promote

adaptive research in agro-forestry

and other related issues

Vegetation status

of farmland

improved and

increases in the

supply of fuel

wood and fodder.

Growth performance trial of 10

multi-purpose tree species

conducted.


resource information service

Increased

availability of

relevant data on

forestry issues.

Central forest resources

information Centre

established and equipped


of forestry data bank

Objective 2.3: To strengthen

climate change mitigation

initiatives

Programme 2.3.1: climate change

Programme

Reduced loss of

lives and

properties due to

flooding and heat

generation

5000 households provided

with subsidized energy-saving

stoves

Early warning unit established

2.3.1.1 Project: Alternative

Energy Initiatives

2.3.1.2

Project: Early

warning/Climate

Intelligence project

2.3.1.3 Project: Biofuel project

Objective 2.4: To Strengthen flood

and erosion control initiatives

Programme 2.4.1: Flood and Reduction of 3 km drainages constructed in

22


Project

Impact/Outcome/

Output

Statement


indicator

Erosion Control Programme incidences of

flood and erosion

across the state

each Local government Area

10 erosion prone/affected

sites reclaimed

2.4.1.1

Project: Drainage

Construction and

rehabilitation

2.4.1.2 Project: Flood and

Erosion Control Project

GOAL 3: TO ENSURE PROPER ENVIRONMENTAL SANITATION, WASTE

MANAGEMENT AND POLLUTION CONTROL

Objective 3.1: To reduce the

sheer volume of waste generation

Programme 3.1.1: Waste

Management Programme

Clean and

Healthy

Environment.

4000 tons of refuse disposed

daily.

3.1.1.1

Project: Municipal

Solid waste

management and

Sanitation

3.1.1.2

Project: Industrial

Waste Management

and Control

3.1.1.3 Project: Domestic

Waste Management

3.1.1.4

Project: Secondary

Waste Management

and control

3.1.1.5

Project: Medical and

Hospital Waste

Management

Programme 3.1.2: Waste-to-

Wealth Programme

Reduction in

unemployment

rate.

1000 scavengers trained and

provided with working

materials.

3.1.2.1 Project: Waste to

Wealth Initiatives

Objective 3.2: To improve

environmental sanitation and

pollution control

Programme 3.2.1: Pollution

control programme

Reduced

environmental

Waste water from wet

industries treated and

23


Project

Impact/Outcome/

Output

Statement


indicator

pollution. discharged.

12 night soil disposal sites

created

4 engineered sanitary land fill

created

3. 2. 1. 1

Project: generate

baseline data on water

& air pollution

3. 2. 1. 2 Project Reduction of

carbon foot print

Programme 3.2.2:

Vector/Mosquito Control

Programme

Reduction in the

rate of malaria

and other vector

borne diseases.

89 Wards in the Metropolitan

LGAs fumigated and sprayed

twice a month

3. 2. 2. 1 Project:

Fumigations/Larviciding

3. 2. 2. 2

Project: Indoor

Residual Spraying

(IRS)

3. 2. 2. 3

Project: Drainage

Evacuation and

Maintenance Project

Programme 3.2.3: Water

Sanitation

Adequate clean

water supplied

3. 2. 2. 1 Project

GOAL 4: TO ENSURE COMMUNITIES BETTER MANAGE THEIR OWN

ENVIRONMENT.

Objective 4.1: To support

community in the development and

implementation of environmental

protection and conservation

initiatives

Decrease in

sanitation related

diseases and

environmental

degradation.

5 Communities in 8

Metropolitan Local Govt.

Areas supported, developed

and implemented

environmental protection and

conservation.

Programme 4.1.1: School

sanitation programme

Improved

personal hygiene

and

environmental

sanitation.

Functional sanitation clubs

established in 20% of the total

primary and secondary

schools

4.1.1.1

Project: integration of

environment issues in

school curricula.

24


Project

Impact/Outcome/

Output

Statement


indicator

4.1.1.2

Project: capacity

development for

health/environmental

officers.

4.1.1.3

Project: Public

awareness on

environmental issues.

Programme 4.1.2: Community

Environmental protection and

conservation programme

Increased

community

awareness and

participation in

environmental

issues

Functional environmental

support groups established in

each Local Government (LG).

4.1.2.1

Project: Community

environmental Health

Initiatives

4.1.2.2

Project: Community

engagement for

environmental

management

4.1.2.3 Project: Public

Enlightenment (media)

GOAL 5: TO STRENGTHEN INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY FOR EFFECTIVE

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT

Objective 5.1: To Improve

Coordination and collaboration

between Environment MDAs and

other stakeholders

Efficient and

effective

environmental

service delivery

MDAs and other environment

sector stakeholders roles and

responsibilities clearly

understood by both parties

Programme 5.1.1: Environmental

Stakeholders Initiative

Citizens

perception on

environmental

services

Increased coordination and

collaboration.

5.1.1.1


of sectoral coordination

mechanisms

Number of

meetings held

Four stakeholders fora held

annually

Programme 5.1.2: Public Private

Partnership (PPP)

Amounts of

private

investment in to

environment

sector

Increased private investment

in environment sector

5.1.2.1 Project: Development Number of private Public Private Partnership

25


Project

Impact/Outcome/

Output

Statement


indicator

of PPP environmental

policy framework and

strategy

partners policy in place

5.1.2.2 Project

5.1.2.3 Project

Objective 5.2: To Develop and

Strengthen Human Resources

Programme 5.2 1: Human

Resource Development

Citizens

perception

Efficient and Effective

Environmental Service

Delivery

5.2.1.1 Project: Institutional

Capacity Assessment

Number of

qualified human

resources

Increased number of qualified

human resource base

5.2.1.2 Project: Employment

of relevant manpower

5.2.1.3 Project: Quality

Management

Objective 5.3: To Establish

Functional Management

Information System

Informed

environmental

programmes

planning resulting

to effective

service delivery

Environmental Management

Information system

Established

Programme 5.3.1: Database

Development and Management

Programme

Data utilization Increased access to

environmental data.

5.3.1.1

Project: Provision of

Information and

Communication

Technology (ICT)

infrastructure and

equipment

Access to

environmental

management data

Environmental data bank in

place

5.3.1.2


and management of

databank

Objective 5.4: To Strengthen

Regulatory Framework

Ensure

environmental

protection

Environment sector laws

reviewed

Programme 5.4.1: Review and

strengthen forestry and

Ensure

environmental

Environment sector laws

reviewed

26


Project

Impact/Outcome/

Output

Statement


indicator

environmental health laws protection

5.4.1.1 Project: Enabling laws

5.4.1.2

Project: Review and

strengthen the

existence

environmental laws

Objective 5.5: To Improve Policy

Formulation and Implementation

Programme 5.5.1: Development

Planning

Citizens

perception More focused service delivery

5.5.1.1

Project: Environment

Sector Plan/MTSS

Development

Number of sector

policy reviewed

Sector plan in place

MTSS rollover

5.5.1.2 Project: Monitoring &

Evaluation

3.8 Responsibilities and Operational Plan

As has been discussed in Section 3.4, specific MDAs within the sector have direct

activities related to specific programmes but some of the programmes have collaborative

approaches. Notwithstanding this situation, the goals in the MTSS have MDAs that have

greater responsibility for their attainment. The table below spells out the responsibilities:

Goals MDA Responsible

1: To Conserve, Protect and Enhance The

Ecosystems And Ecological Processes

MoENVT (Ecology and Forestry

Department)

2: To Halt and Reverse Desertification, Soil

Degradation and Mitigate the Impact of Climate

Change

KNAP

3: To Ensure Proper Environmental Sanitation, Waste

Management and Pollution Control

REMASAB

4: To Ensure Communities Better Manage their Own

Environment

Sustainable Kano Programme

(SKP)

5: To Strengthen Institutional Capacity for Effective

Environmental Management

MoENVT

27

Chapter Four: Three Year Expenditure Projections

4.1 The Process Used to Make Expenditure Projection

The environment sector mainly relies on the state resources except sometimes what is

coming from ecological fund, Federal Government, World Bank, NGOs and other

collaborating sectors like health. Efforts were made to know how much is expected from

any support but proved abortive. Hence, the decision to limit the expenditure projection

to the ceiling provided by Ministry of Planning and Budget (MoPB) in the prepared KSDP

produced in 2012. According to the plan the sum of N5.51b, N5.93b and N6.38b were

set for environmental sector for three consecutive years (2013-2015).

Though the ceiling provided by MOPB was a block figure for 2013 as an example. The

total budget for the sector was two billion four hundred and nineteen million, six hundred

and ninety six thousand (2, 419, 696,000). Out of this amount the sum of

(1,179,863,000) representing 48.76% was for recurrent expenditure while the balance of

(1,239,833,080) representing 51.24% was for capital expenditure. The percentage of the

overhead within the recurrent was 50.01 % at N590, 000,000.

A template was designed to aid the costing of the MTSS. Standard unit cost/price was

first obtained from the State Statistical Year book and market surveys as well as

standard already agreed by government like issues to do with duty travelling expenses

etc.

Basic assumption of 5% Inflationary rate was made which was programmed to

automatically be added from the second year to third year of the plan for both capital and

recurrent activities. Previous expenditure of the sector was also considered and more

importantly the sector capacity to implement what is planned.

The programs/projects outlined in the log-frame when costed by far exceeded the

ceiling. However, prioritization process was provided by the template to filter the most

critical and vital projects that require immediate attention, which will be submitted to

State Budget Department.

The template allows an entry of both the unit cost and the number of quantities required

to automatically generate the total cost. The template further provides column where the

ceiling given to the sector is entered so that when it comes to budget whatever entry is

made is automatically deducted from the ceiling until it is exhausted having prioritized

the need.

28

4.2 Outline Expenditure Projections

The log-frame is designed to ensure that any activity to be executed is linked to relevant

projects that have a defined objective intended to achieve the planned goal/program that

is spelt by state policy. This makes it easier for the government to measure the

performance of the sector at the end of the reviewed period.

The capital expenditure seems to have taken the large amount of the expenditure. This

is because the ministry is newly created and thus require more infrastructural facilities.

Most of the heavy projects included are been phased to ensure completion within the

medium-term progression. Each capital project is however, tied with its recurrent

component.

Kano State Environment Sector 2013 MTSS

Capital-Budget vs. MTSS

MDAs Budget Ceiling MTSS cost Variance (%)

Department of

Ecology/Forestry 104,000,000 104,000,000

0%

Department of

Planning

Research and

Statistics

115,733,000 115,733,000 0%

Department of

Pollution Control 70,000,000 70,000,000 0%

KNAP 136,100,000 136,100,000 0%

REMASAB 579,000,000 579,000,000 0%

SKP 150,000,000 150,000,000 0%

School of

Hygiene 85,000,000 85,000,000 0%

Total 1,239,833,000 1,239,833,000 0%

29

Environment Sector Goals Objective and Capital Projects Costed


Project

2013

MTSS Cost

2014

MTSS Cost

2015

MTSS Cost

TOTAL 2013 - 2015 MTSS Cost

for the Sector (Capital Projects) 1,239,833,000 1,266,508,221 1,734,719,321

GOAL 1: TO CONSERVE,

PROTECT AND ENHANCE THE

ECOSYSTEMS AND

ECOLOGICAL PROCESSES

115,100,000 123,618,010 101,655,010

Objective 1.1: To promote the

expansion and conservation of

flora, fauna and forest estates for

sustained yield

115,100,000 123,618,010 101,655,010

Programme 1.1.1: Forest estates

enrichment planting schemes 39,000,000 27,941,510 27,941,510

1.1.1.1

Project: Forest

reserves and

Communal Forest

Areas Re-survey and

demarcation Areas

Nil Nil Nil

1.1.1.2

Project: Industrial

Plantation /Forest

enrichment Planting

39,000,000 27,941,510 27,941,510

Programme 1.1.2: Bio-diversity

conservation initiative Nil 34,576,500 24,713,500

1.1.2.1

Project: Semi-arid

zone Flora and fauna

Conservation

Nil 9,863,000 Nil

1.1.2.2

Project: Multiplication

and re-stocking of

species with low status

Nil 24,713,500 24,713,500

Programme 1.1.3: Green Kano

programme 15,000,000 15,000,000 15,000,000


of parks and gardens. 15,000,000 15,000,000 15,000,000

1.1.3.2

Project:

Roadside/avenues tree

plantings scheme

Nil Nil Nil


protection initiatives 61,100,000 46,100,000 34,000,000

1.1.4.1 Project: Construction

of fire-traces and patrol Nil Nil Nil

30


Project

2013

MTSS Cost

2014

MTSS Cost

2015

MTSS Cost

in forest estates and

game reserves

1.1.4.2 Project: Silvio Postural

and Pest control 39,000,000 34,000,000 34,000,000

1.1.4.3

Project: Silvicultural

management of 200km


estates

22,100,000 12,100,000 Nil -

GOAL 2: TO HALT AND

REVERSE DESERTIFICATION,

SOIL DEGRADATION AND

MITIGATE THE IMPACT OF

CLIMATE CHANGE

351,233,000 374,390,211 614,064,311

Objective 2.1: To support mass

afforestation and social forestry

practices

105,000,000 132,590,686 124,764,786

Programme 2.1.1: Soil and

degraded land reclamation 61,000,000 83,377,970 83,377,970


of 60km shelterbelts 30,000,000 49,295,000 49,295,000

2.1.1.2


of

Watershed/catchment

plantations

Nil Nil Nil

2.1.1.3 Project: Production of

9million tree seedlings 31,000,000 34,082,970 34,082,970

Programme 2.1.2: Private forestry

scheme 39,000,000 44,212,716 36,386,816

2.1.2.1

Project: Private

forestry/orchard

development

24,000,000 16,856,816 11,856,816

2.1.2.2 Project Sustainable

honey production 15,000,000 27,355,900 24,530,000

2.1.2.3 Project Tree planting

campaign Nil Nil Nil

Programme 2.1.3: Annual tree

planting programme 5,000,000 5,000,000 5,000,000

2.1.3.1 Project: Tree planting

campaign 5,000,000 5,000,000 5,000,000

Objective 2.2: To promote adaptive

research in agro-forestry and other Nil Nil Nil

31


Project

2013

MTSS Cost

2014

MTSS Cost

2015

MTSS Cost

related issues

Programme 2.2.1: Forest resource

information service Nil Nil Nil


of forestry data bank Nil Nil Nil

Objective 2.3: To strengthen

climate change mitigation initiatives 20,000,000 5,566,525 5,566,525

Programme 2.3.1: Climate change

programme 20,000,000 5,566,525 5,566,525

2.3.1.1 Project: Alternative

energy initiatives 20,000,000 5,566,525 5,566,525

2.3.1.2

Project: Early

warning/climate

intelligence project

Nil Nil Nil

2.3.1.3 Project: Biofuel project Nil Nil Nil

Objective 2.4: To Strengthen flood

and erosion control initiatives 226,233,000 236,233,000 483,733,000

Programme 2.4.1: Flood and

Erosion Control Programme 226,233,000 236,233,000 483,733,000

2.4.1.1

Project: Drainage

construction and

rehabilitation

110,500,000 120,500,000 260,000,000

2.4.1.2 Project: Flood and

erosion control project 115,733,000 115,733,000 223,733,000

Goal 3: TO ENSURE PROPER

ENVIRONMENTAL SANITATION,

WASTE MANAGEMENT AND

POLLUTION CONTROL

664,000,000 669,000,000 969,000,000

Objective 3.1: To reduce the sheer

volume of waste generation 524,000,000 529,000,000 819,000,000

Programme 3.1.1: Waste

management programme 509,000,000 524,000,000 809,000,000

3.1.1.1

Project: Municipal

Solid waste

management and

Sanitation

479,000,000 479,000,000 479,000,000

3.1.1.2

Project: Industrial

Waste Management

and Control

10,000,000 10,000,000 10,000,000

3.1.1.3 Project: Domestic

Waste Management Nil Nil Nil

32


Project

2013

MTSS Cost

2014

MTSS Cost

2015

MTSS Cost

3.1.1.4

Project: Secondary

Waste Management

and control

20,000,000 35,000,000 320,000,000

3.1.1.5

Project: Medical and

Hospital Waste

Management

Nil Nil Nil

Programme 3.1.2: Waste-to-

Wealth Programme 15,000,000 5,000,000 10,000,000

3.1.2.1 Project: Waste to

Wealth Initiatives 15,000,000 5,000,000 10,000,000

Objective 3.2: To improve

environmental sanitation and

pollution control

140,000,000 140,000,000 150,000,000

Programme 3.2.1: Pollution control

programme Nil Nil Nil

3.2.1.1

Project: generate

baseline data on water

& air pollution

Nil Nil Nil

3.2.1.2 Project: Reduction of

carbon foot print Nil Nil Nil

Programme 3.2.2:

Vector/Mosquito Control

Programme

140,000,000 140,000,000 150,000,000

3.2.2.1 Project:

Fumigations/Larviciding - - -

3.2.2.2

Project: Indoor

Residual Spraying

(IRS)

100,000,000 100,000,000 100,000,000

3.2.2.3

Project: Drainage

Evacuation and

Maintenance Project

40,000,000 40,000,000 50,000,000

GOAL 4: TO ENSURE

COMMUNITIES BETTER

MANAGE THEIR OWN

ENVIRONMENT.

109,500,000 99,500,000 50,000,000

Objective 4.1: To support

community in the development and

implementation of environmental

protection and conservation

initiatives

109,500,000 99,500,000 50,000,000

Programme 4.1.1: School 95,000,000 85,000,000 20,000,000

33


Project

2013

MTSS Cost

2014

MTSS Cost

2015

MTSS Cost

sanitation programme

4.1.1.1

Project: integration of


school curricula.

85,000,000 75,000,000 5,000,000

4.1.1.2

Project: capacity

development for

health/environmental

officers.

Nil Nil Nil

4.1.1.3

Project: Public

awareness on


10,000,000 10,000,000 15,000,000

Programme 4.1.2: Community

Environmental protection and

conservation programme

14,500,000 14,500,000 30,000,000

4.1.2.1

Project: Community


Initiatives

14,500,000 14,500,000 30,000,000

Nil 4.1.2.2

Project: Community

engagement for

environmental

management

Nil Nil Nil

4.1.2.3 Project: Public

Enlightenment (media) Nil Nil Nil

GOAL 5: TO STRENGTHEN

INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY FOR

EFFECTIVE ENVIRONMENTAL

MANAGEMENT

Nil Nil Nil

Objective 5.1: To Improve

Coordination and collaboration

between Environment MDAs and

other stakeholders

Nil Nil Nil

Programme 5.1.1: Environmental

Stakeholders Initiative Nil Nil Nil

5.1.1.1

Project: establishment

of sectoral coordination

mechanisms

Nil Nil Nil

Programme 5.1.2: Public Private

Partnership (PPP) - Nil Nil

5.1.2.1

Project: Development

of PPP environmental

policy framework and

Nil Nil Nil

34


Project

2013

MTSS Cost

2014

MTSS Cost

2015

MTSS Cost

strategy

5.1.2.2 Project Nil Nil Nil

Objective 5.2: To Develop and

Strengthen Human Resources Nil Nil Nil

Programme 5.2 1: Human

Resource Development Nil Nil Nil

5.2.1.1 Project: Institutional

Capacity Assessment Nil Nil Nil

5.2.1.2 Project: Employment

of relevant manpower Nil Nil Nil

5.2.1.3 Project: Quality

Management Nil Nil Nil

Objective 5.3: To Establish

Functional Management

Information System

- Nil Nil

Programme 5.3.1: Database

Development and Management

Programme

Nil Nil Nil

5.3.1.1

Project: Provision of

ICT infrastructure and

equipment

Nil Nil Nil

5.3.1.2


and management of

databank

Nil Nil Nil

Objective 5.4: To Strengthen

Regulatory Framework Nil Nil Nil

Programme 5.4.1: Review and

strengthen forestry and

environmental health laws

Nil Nil Nil

5.4.1.1 Project: Enabling laws Nil Nil Nil

5.4.1.2

Project: Review and

strengthen the

existence

environmental laws

Nil Nil Nil

Objective 5.5: To Improve Policy

Formulation and Implementation Nil Nil Nil

Programme 5.5.1: Development

Planning Nil Nil Nil

5.5.1.1

Project: Environment

Sector Plan/MTSS

Development

Nil Nil Nil

35


Project

2013

MTSS Cost

2014

MTSS Cost

2015

MTSS Cost

5.5.1.2 Project: Monitoring

and Evaluation Nil Nil Nil

Kano State Environment Sector 2013-2015 MTSS

Capital Budget

Accounts Description 2012 (Jan-

Dec) 2013 2014 2015

2301001

Purchase of

Motor

Vehicles

15,000,000 15,000,000 15,000,000

2301002

Other

Transport

Equipment

305,000,000 355,000,000 355,000,000

2302006

Purchase of

Medical

Equipment

125,000,000 120,000,000 110,000,000

2302012

Purchase of

Agric

Equipment

122,000,000 146,370,696 139,619,796

2302013

Purchase of

Educational

Institutions

Furniture

10,000,000 10,000,000 5,000,000

2302014

Other

Equipment

36,000,000 42,429,525 34,566,525

2303001

Compensatio

n on Land

and Buildings

25,000,000 40,000,000 25,000,000

2303002

Construction

of Offices

14,000,000 - -

2303006

Construction

of

Educational

Institution

Buildings

65,000,000 55,000,000 -

2306003

Other

Infrastructure

522,833,000 482,708,000

1,047,608,0

00

Total

NGN-

1,239,833,0

00

1,266,508,22

1

1,732,494,3

21

36

Chapter Five: Monitoring and Evaluation

5.1 Monitoring and Evaluation

In order to know the effectiveness of implementation and whether or not the Goals,

targets and overall objectives of the plan are being achieved, it is essential to monitor

and evaluate the key performance indicators. While monitoring involves the collection of

relevant information to help track the progress made on the indicators, evaluation

involves careful examination of the information to assess the impact of the policies,

programmes and projects especially with regards to outcomes and need for

adjustments. This way, the sector performances will be tracked, analysed and improved,

while policy formulation, resource allocation decisions and project execution will be more

effective. Monitoring and evaluation are thus necessary for the achievement of planned

goals and objectives and therefore, key to the successful implementation of the MTSS.

5.2 Key Performance Indicator

Sector/MDA

S/

N

Goal/purpose/

outcome KPIs

Source(s) of

Data

Category/Level

(Where

applicable

Baseline Baseline

Year

2013

Target

2014

Target

2015

Target Remark

1

To secure a

quality of

environment

that is adequate

for good health

and wellbeing

of the people,

and; to

conserve and

use the

environment

and natural

resources for

the benefit of

present and

future

generations.

Incidences

of

pollution

(solid,

liquid and

Gas)

Ministry of

Environment,

REMASAB

Carbon

Monoxide 25.93 2012 23.95 21.97 19.99

Standard

rate - 20

Nitrogen

Dioxide 0.74 2012 0.51 0.28 0.05

Standard

rate

0.04-

0.05

Sulphur Dioxide 0.14 2012 0.13 0.12 0.11 Standard

rate 0.10

Carbon Dioxide

Solid Waste

Water

(Test Results) 5.95% 2011

2

Proportion

of

industries

meeting

waste

disposal

standard

33% 2011 38% 43% 58%

3

Rate of

desertifica

tion

43.0% 2011 40% 37% 34%

4 Adequate . Yes/No

38

environme

ntal

policies

agreed

(forestry

and

sanitation

laws)

5

Number of

functional

effluent

(in-house

and

central)

treatment

plant

Ministry of

Environment 51.85% 2011 80% 90% 95%

6

To restore,

maintain and

enhance the

ecosystems

and ecological

processes

essential for the

functioning of

the biosphere to

preserve

biological

diversity and

the principle of

Proportion

of clean

and free

flowing

drainages.

Ministry of

Environment

As at 2012,

Kano State has

about 110Km of

urban drainages

cleared

36.66% 2012 50% 60% 70%

300 Km

of

drainage

s exist in

the

urban

area

7

Level of

public

awarenes

s on

environme

ntal

68.33% 2013 75.33%

82% 90%

39

4 (Vitex doniana, Butyrouspermum paradoxum, Anogeissus lieorcapus, Parkia biglobosa, Tamarandus indica, Diospyros mespiliformis, Cordia africana, Faidherbia

albida)

optimum

sustainable

yield in the use

of natural

resources and

ecosystems.

degradatio

n

8

Response

s to

erosion

and

flooding

Persons

interviewed

along Jakara

river

Citizens

satisfaction level 47% 2012 52% 58% 62%

Value of

property,

number of lives

(where

necessary)

30 Local

Govts

affected

by

flooding.

N300m

worth of

propertie

s/crops

were lost

2011

20

Local

Govts

affecte

d by

floodin

g

16

Local

Govts

affecte

d by

flooding

10

Local

Govts

affecte

d by

flooding

9

Availability

of

endangere

d plant

species.

Ministry of

Environment 1 specie 2011

3

species

5

species

7

species

Seven

identified

species4

10

Rate of

encroach

ment in

Forest

reserve

(FR) and

Inventory and

management

unit, Ecology

and Forestry

Department

60% 2010 55% 50% 45%

40

communit

y forest

areas

(CFR)

11

Rate of

deforestati

on

25 trees 2010 22

trees

19

trees

17

trees

Average

standard

of trees

per farm

land - 17

12

Proportion

of people

using

improved

toilet

facility

Across the state 25% 2012 30% 45% 55%

Urban 20% 2012 24% 35% 40%

Rural 5%

2012 6% 10% 15%

5.3 Conducting Annual Sector Review

The first AESR was undertaken in June 2010. In preparation for the review, state

MoEnvt produced the comprehensive Annual Environment Sector Performance Report,

including assessment of progress towards meeting indicators, and implementation of

MTSS in general. The report included lessons learned and recommendations as a basis

for discussions during the AESR. This required support from Department for

International Development (DFID) - SPARC

Sector performance indicators and targets from 2011 to 2013 are outlined in the

following tables. EnvMIS data for 2009-2010 is available and used as a baseline from

which to measure progress

The instruments and procedures that would be used for the purposes of monitoring and

evaluation of the MTSS will include, though not limited to:

Results framework template to support any standard monitoring and evaluation

procedures with respect to public plans and budgets economic surveys including

core welfare indicator surveys for impact assessment;

Specific impact surveys and assessments as needed to support policy, planning

or implementation.

Since monitoring and evaluation is about tracking, enforcement and adjustments, its

process should require that:

Each MDA within the sector will be linked and made consistent with the implementation framework of the KSDP involving the MTSS and annual budgets as appropriate;

Each sector plan and strategy be regularly reviewed and brought up to date with changes that may be necessary within the overall provisions of the MTSS;

The monitoring and evaluation process to be participatory with the involvement of

the organized private sector, non-governmental and community based

organizations and other key stakeholders in decision-making, policy formulation

and implementation.

5.4 Organisational Arrangements

In the current situation, all MDAS should have unit charged with monitoring and

evaluation activities. It is now proposed that MTSS monitoring committee should be

formed with each MDAS’ monitoring and evaluation leader to serve in the committee

under the leadership of the DPRS in the MoENVT charged with responsibility of

producing the quarterly report. For the annual sector performance report, most data will

come from centralized EnvMIS, which will be responsible for collecting all the reports

and producing the annual progress report.

The AESR ensures year performance assessment and complements the budgetary

cycle so that informed decisions can be taken prior to budget preparation. It is expected

that annual reviews will eliminate the need for development partners to request separate

42

reviews for individual projects and support programs. The review covered whole sector

performance and will, if necessary, cover all aspects of annual environmental

development, including projects and sub-programs.

Sector performance indicators and targets from 2011 to 2013 are outlined in the

following tables. EnvMIS data for 2009-2010 is available and used as a baseline from

which to measure progress.

43

Kano State Environment Sector-wide MTSS 2013 to 2014

(Costed projects and Activities)

MTSS Project 2013 Activity 2013 Activity

Costs 2014 Activity

2014 Activity

Costs 2015 Activity

2015 Activity

Costs

Industrial Plantation

/Forest enrichment

Planting

Establish 30ha

Gum Arabic

Plantation

10,000,000

Establish 20ha

Gum Arabic

Plantation

11,320,660

Establish 30ha

Gum Arabic

Plantation

11,320,660

Enrichment

planting of 20

ha deforested

forest and

Sustainable

Management of

Shelterbelts

Estate

29,000,000

Enrichment

planting of 20 ha

deforested forest

and Sustainable

Management of

Shelterbelts

Estate

16,620,850

Enrichment

planting of 20

ha deforested

forest and

Sustainable

Management of

Shelterbelts

Estate

16,620,850

Semi-arid zone Flora

and fauna Conservation - -

Undertake flora

and fauna survey

in the semi-arid

zone of the State

9,863,000 - -

Multiplication and re-

stocking of species with

low status

- -

Procure 50

animals and 2

bags of seed

stocks

5,640,000

Procure 50

animals and 2

bags of seed

stocks

5,640,000

- -

Establish 6ha

plant species trial

plots.

27,500

Establish 6ha

plant species

trial plots.

27,500

- - Construct 10

pens for breeding 18,000,000

Construct 10

pens for 18,000,000

../../../../AppData/Local/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.Outlook/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.Outlook/AppData/Emeka%20Ngene/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.IE5/AppData/Roaming/Microsoft/Word/Kano%20Environment%20MTSS/%5bKano%20Environment%20MTSS%202013%20to%202015%20Harmonized.xlsx%5d1.1.1.2a!f10









../../../../AppData/Local/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.Outlook/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.Outlook/AppData/Emeka%20Ngene/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.IE5/AppData/Roaming/Microsoft/Word/Kano%20Environment%20MTSS/%5bKano%20Environment%20MTSS%202013%20to%202015%20Harmonized.xlsx%5d1.1.1.2b!f10













































../../../../AppData/Local/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.Outlook/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.Outlook/AppData/Emeka%20Ngene/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.IE5/AppData/Roaming/Microsoft/Word/Kano%20Environment%20MTSS/%5bKano%20Environment%20MTSS%202013%20to%202015%20Harmonized.xlsx%5d1.1.2.2c!f10





44


Costs 2014 Activity

2014 Activity

Costs 2015 Activity

2015 Activity

Costs

animals’ seed

stocks.

breeding

animals’ seed

stocks.

- -

Re-introduce 25

animals into the

wild.

1,046,000

Re-introduce

25 animals into

the wild.

1,046,000

Establishment of parks

and gardens.

Construct 10

parks and

gardens within

Kano

metropolis

15,000,000

Construct 10

parks and

gardens within

Kano metropolis

15,000,000

Construct 10

parks and

gardens within

Kano

metropolis

15,000,000

Silvio Postural and Pest

control

Conduct Soil

and Degraded

Land

Redemption

9,000,000

Conduct Soil and

Degraded Land

Redemption

4,000,000

Conduct Soil

and Degraded

Land

Redemption

4,000,000

Drought and

Desertification

Control (GGW)

30,000,000

Drought and

Desertification

Control (GGW)

30,000,000

Drought and

Desertification

Control (GGW)

30,000,000

Silvio-cultural

management of 200km


estates

Conduct

Inventory

Survey on

Forest

Resource

Utilization

12,100,000

Conduct

Inventory Survey

on Forest

Resource

Utilization

12,100,000 - -

Demarcate and

enrichment

planting of 7

10,000,000 - - - -






../../../../AppData/Local/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.Outlook/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.Outlook/AppData/Emeka%20Ngene/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.IE5/AppData/Roaming/Microsoft/Word/Kano%20Environment%20MTSS/%5bKano%20Environment%20MTSS%202013%20to%202015%20Harmonized.xlsx%5d1.1.2.2d!f10


























































45


Costs 2014 Activity

2014 Activity

Costs 2015 Activity

2015 Activity

Costs

forest reserves

Establishment of 60km

shelterbelts

Acquire 20km x

30m land; 18,000,000

Acquire 20km x

30m land; 18,000,000

Acquire 20km

x 30m land; 18,000,000

Survey and

demarcate the

land;

12,000,000

Survey and

demarcate the

land;

14,310,000

Survey and

demarcate the

land;

14,310,000

- - Plant 79,980

seedlings; 1,110,000

Plant 79,980


- -

Provide fencing

of 20km in

blocks.

15,875,000

Provide

fencing of 20km

in blocks.

15,875,000

Production of 9 million

tree seedlings

Upgrade

Nursery and

Produce 1

million assorted

tree seedlings;

11,000,000

Upgrade Nursery

and Produce 1

million assorted

tree seedlings;

14,082,970

Upgrade

Nursery and

Produce 1

million assorted

tree seedlings;

14,082,970

Produce 2

million assorted

tree seedlings;

20,000,000

Produce 2 million

assorted tree

seedlings;

20,000,000

Produce 2

million assorted

tree seedlings;

20,000,000

Private

Forestry/Orchard

Development

Train 300

farmers and 25

extension

officers;

5,000,000

Train 300

farmers and 25

extension

officers;

7,933,000

Train 300

farmers and 25

extension

officers;

7,933,000

Rehabilitate

KNAP Office 14,000,000 - - - -

Sensitize the

farmers through -

Sensitize the

farmers through 3,923,816

Rehabilitate

KNAP Office 3,923,816










































































46


Costs 2014 Activity

2014 Activity

Costs 2015 Activity

2015 Activity

Costs

radio (52

times/year), TV

(13 times/year),

pamphlets and

posters.

radio (52

times/year), TV

(13 times/year),

pamphlets and

posters.

Support 200

farmers from

the 44 LGAs

with Seedlings,

Working

Materials,

Fencing

Material,

Insecticides and

technical inputs

to establish

wood

lots/orchards

5,000,000

Support 200

farmers from the

44 LGAs with

Seedlings,

Working

Materials,

Fencing Material,

Insecticides and

technical inputs

to establish wood

lots/orchards

5,000,000 - -

Sustainable honey

production

Procure 3,000

local hives,

500KTB and

500 Lang troth

hives;

15,000,000

Procure 3,000

local hives,

500KTB and 500

Lang troth hives;

24,530,000

Procure 3,000

local hives,

500KTB and

500 Lang troth

hives;

24,530,000

- -

Procure honey

extraction,

processing

equipment and

390,900 - -
























































47


Costs 2014 Activity

2014 Activity

Costs 2015 Activity

2015 Activity

Costs

packaging

containers;

- -

Set up 2 new

apiaries and

maintain the

existing 3.3

times/year),

pamphlets and

posters.

2,435,000 - -

Tree planting campaign

Raise and plant

500,000

seedlings;

4,263,750

Raise and plant

500,000

seedlings;

4,263,750

Raise and

plant 500,000

seedlings;

4,263,750

Conduct local

Government

tree planting

Competition

736,250

Conduct local

Government tree

planting

Competition

736,250

Conduct local

Government

tree planting

Competition

736,250

Promotion of

Alternative source

Energy

Procure 1350

energy-saving

stoves;

5,000,000

Procure 1500

energy-saving

stoves;

5,481,525

Procure 1500

energy-saving

stoves;

5,481,525

- -

Train 80 women

on the usage of

the stoves

85,000

Train 80

women on the

usage of the

stoves

85,000

Establish 3ha

Biofuel,

Firewood and

Tanning

15,000,000 - - - -
























































48


Costs 2014 Activity

2014 Activity

Costs 2015 Activity

2015 Activity

Costs

Plantation

Drainage Construction

and rehabilitation

Construct 15

km of drainages

through

community

partnerships

100,000,000

Construct 20 km

of drainages

through

community

partnerships

115,000,000

Construct 50

km of

drainages

through

community

partnerships

250,000,000

Provide

thematic Maps

of Kano State

7,000,000

Provide thematic

Maps of Kano

State

3,000,000

Provide

thematic Maps

of Kano State

5,000,000

Implement

Sustainable

Urban Mobility

Project

3,500,000

Implement

Sustainable

Urban Mobility

Project

2,500,000

Implement

Sustainable

Urban Mobility

Project

5,000,000

Flood and Erosion

Control Project

Sand fill erosion

prone and erect

retaining walls

in 2 affected

sites

54,000,000

Sand fill erosion

prone and erect

retaining walls in

2 affected sites

54,000,000

Sand fill

erosion prone

and erect

retaining walls

in 6 affected

sites

162,000,000

Construct

Kurnar Asabe

Flood Control

drainage and

mini bridge

61,733,000

Construct Kurnar

Asabe Flood

Control drainage

and mini bridge

61,733,000

Construct

Kurnar Asabe

Flood Control

drainage and

mini bridge

61,733,000

Municipal Solid waste

management and

Maintain100

Trucks 55,000,000

Maintenance of

100 Trucks 55,000,000

Maintenance

of 100 Trucks 55,000,000










































































49


Costs 2014 Activity

2014 Activity

Costs 2015 Activity

2015 Activity

Costs

Sanitation {Purchase

Batteries and

Tires}

{Purchase

Batteries and

Tires)

{Purchase

Batteries and

Tires)

Procure Heavy

Equipment 250,000,000

Procure Heavy


Procure Heavy


Construct

Diesel Refilling

Station

25,000,000 - - - -

Construct

Dumpsites 25,000,000

Construct

Dumpsites 25,000,000 - 25,000,000

Construct Micro

composting

Plant

100,000,000 Construct Micro

composting Plant 75,000,000

Construct

Micro

composting

Plant

75,000,000

Procure refuse

liter bins and

street working

materials

24,000,000

Procure refuse

liter bins and

street working

materials

24,000,000

Procure refuse

liter bins and

street working

materials

24,000,000

Industrial Waste

Management and

Control

Procure

Laboratory

equipment and

Chemicals for

Food, soil and

air quality

control

10,000,000

Procure

Laboratory

equipment and

Chemicals for

Food, soil and air

quality control

10,000,000

Procure

Laboratory

equipment and

Chemicals for

Food, soil and

air quality

control

10,000,000

Domestic Waste

Management

Conduct daily

evacuation of -

Conduct daily

evacuation of 240 -

Conduct daily

evacuation of -


























../../../../AppData/Local/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.Outlook/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.Outlook/AppData/Emeka%20Ngene/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.IE5/AppData/Roaming/Microsoft/Word/Kano%20Environment%20MTSS/%5bKano%20Environment%20MTSS%202013%20to%202015%20Harmonized.xlsx%5d3.1.1.1e!f10









../../../../AppData/Local/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.Outlook/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.Outlook/AppData/Emeka%20Ngene/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.IE5/AppData/Roaming/Microsoft/Word/Kano%20Environment%20MTSS/%5bKano%20Environment%20MTSS%202013%20to%202015%20Harmonized.xlsx%5d3.1.1.1f!f10






































50


Costs 2014 Activity

2014 Activity

Costs 2015 Activity

2015 Activity

Costs

240 approved

collection

centers.

approved

collection

centers.

240 approved

collection

centers.

Secondary Waste

Management and

control

- -

Conduct

feasibility study

for land

acquisition

15,000,000 - -

- - - -

Design and

construct 3

secondary

treatment

plants.

300,000,000

Procure Gully

Emptier for

sewage and

night soil

disposal

10,000,000

Procure Gully

Emptier for

sewage and night

soil disposal

10,000,000

Procure Gully

Emptier for

sewage and

night soil

disposal

10,000,000

Procure Night

Soil Van and

Disposal sites

10,000,000

Procure Night

Soil Van and

Disposal sites

10,000,000

Procure Night

Soil Van and

Disposal sites

10,000,000

Medical and Hospital

Waste Management

Evacuate and

dispose waste

from 10 major

hospitals in the

metropolis

weekly.

-

Evacuate and

dispose waste

from 10 major

hospitals in the

metropolis

weekly.

-

Evacuate and

dispose waste

from 10 major

hospitals in the

metropolis

weekly.

-

Waste to Wealth Support 15,000,000 Support 5,000,000 Support 10,000,000



































































51


Costs 2014 Activity

2014 Activity

Costs 2015 Activity

2015 Activity

Costs

Initiatives Community

Waste to

Wealth

activities

Community

Waste to Wealth

activities

Community

Waste to

Wealth

activities


Conduct

fumigates and

spray 88

political wards

of the

metropolis

-

Conduct

fumigates and

spray 88 political

wards of the

metropolis

-

Conduct

fumigates and

spray 88

political wards

of the

metropolis

-

Indoor Residual

Spraying (IRS)

Procure

chemical and

Equipment for

Indoor Residual

Spraying in 88

Communities

100,000,000

Procure

chemical and

Equipment for

Indoor Residual

Spraying in 88

Communities

100,000,000

Procure

chemical and

Equipment for

Indoor Residual

Spraying in 88

Communities

100,000,000

Drainage Evacuation

and Maintenance

Project

Rehabilitate

and Evacuation

of Drainages

40,000,000

Rehabilitate and

Evacuation of

Drainages

40,000,000

Rehabilitate

and Evacuation

of Drainages

50,000,000

Integration of


school curriculum

Construction of

the

Convocation

Square

15,000,000 - - - -

Provision of the

Laboratory

Equipment

10,000,000

Provision of the

Laboratory

Equipment

10,000,000 - -

Construction 50,000,000 Construction 50,000,000 - -








































































52


Costs 2014 Activity

2014 Activity

Costs 2015 Activity

2015 Activity

Costs

Hostel

Accommodation

Hostel

Accommodation

Construction of

Laundry for the

School of

Hygiene

-

Construction of

Laundry for the

School of

Hygiene

5,000,000 - -

Accreditation of

Programmes 5,000,000

Accreditation of

Programmes 5,000,000

Accreditation

of Programmes 5,000,000

- 5,000,000

Facilitate

environmental

and hygienic

education into

school curriculum

5,000,000 - -

Public awareness on


Public

Mobilization on

print and

Electronic

Media for

Community

involvement

10,000,000

Public

Mobilization on

print and

Electronic Media

for Community

involvement

10,000,000

Public

Mobilization on

print and

Electronic

Media for

Community

involvement

15,000,000

Community


Initiatives

Support

Community

Water

Boreholes

schemes

14,500,000

Support

Community

Water Boreholes

schemes

14,500,000

Support

Community

Water

Boreholes

schemes

30,000,000

Total () Sector Cost in

2013 1,239,833,000

Sector Cost in

2014 1,266,508,221

Sector Cost in

2015 1,734,719,321





























































53

Kano State Ministry of Environment MTSS 2013 to 2014



Costs 2014 Activity

2014 Activity

Costs 2015 Activity

2015 Activity

Costs

Department of Ecology/Forestry

Semi-arid

zone Flora

and fauna

Conservation

- -

Undertake

flora and fauna

survey in the

semi-arid zone

of the State

9,863,000 - -

Multiplication

and re-

stocking of

species with

low status

- -

Procure 50

animals and 2

bags of seed

stocks

5,640,000

Procure 50

animals and 2

bags of seed

stocks

5,640,000

- -

Establish 6ha

plant species

trial plots.

27,500

Establish 6ha

plant species trial

plots.

27,500

- -

Construct 10

pens for

breeding

animal’s seed

stocks.

18,000,000

Construct 10 pens

for breeding animal

seed stocks.

18,000,000

- -

Re-introduce

25 animals into

the wild.

1,046,000

Re-introduce 25

animals into the

wild.

1,046,000

Establishment

of parks and

Construct 10

parks and 15,000,000

Construct 10

parks and 15,000,000

Construct 10

parks and gardens 15,000,000

../../../../AppData/Local/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.Outlook/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.Outlook/AppData/Emeka%20Ngene/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.IE5/DUZVV57R/Kano%20Environment%20MTSS/%5bKano%20Environment%20MTSS%202013%20to%202015%20Harmonized.xlsx%5d1.1.2.1a!f10
















../../../../AppData/Local/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.Outlook/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.Outlook/AppData/Emeka%20Ngene/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.IE5/DUZVV57R/Kano%20Environment%20MTSS/%5bKano%20Environment%20MTSS%202013%20to%202015%20Harmonized.xlsx%5d1.1.2.2b!f10







../../../../AppData/Local/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.Outlook/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.Outlook/AppData/Emeka%20Ngene/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.IE5/DUZVV57R/Kano%20Environment%20MTSS/%5bKano%20Environment%20MTSS%202013%20to%202015%20Harmonized.xlsx%5d1.1.2.2c!f10









../../../../AppData/Local/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.Outlook/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.Outlook/AppData/Emeka%20Ngene/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.IE5/DUZVV57R/Kano%20Environment%20MTSS/%5bKano%20Environment%20MTSS%202013%20to%202015%20Harmonized.xlsx%5d1.1.2.2d!f10













54


Costs 2014 Activity

2014 Activity

Costs 2015 Activity

2015 Activity

Costs

gardens. gardens within

Kano metropolis

gardens within

Kano

metropolis

within Kano

metropolis

Silvio Postural

and Pest

control

Conduct Soil and

Degraded Land

Redemption

9,000,000

Conduct Soil

and Degraded

Land

Redemption

4,000,000

Conduct Soil and

Degraded Land

Redemption

4,000,000

Drought and

Desertification

Control (GGW)

30,000,000

Drought and

Desertification

Control (GGW)

30,000,000

Drought and

Desertification

Control (GGW)

30,000,000

Demarcate and

enrichment

planting of 7

forest reserves

10,000,000 - - - -

Produce 2 million

assorted tree

seedlings;

20,000,000

Produce 2

million assorted

tree seedlings;

20,000,000

Produce 2 million

assorted tree

seedlings;

20,000,000

Tree planting

campaign

Raise and plant

500,000

seedlings;

4,263,750

Raise and

plant 500,000

seedlings;

4,263,750 Raise and plant

500,000 seedlings; 4,263,750

Conduct local

Government tree

planting

Competition

736,250

Conduct local

Government

tree planting

Competition

736,250

Conduct local

Government tree

planting

Competition

736,250

Establish 3ha

Biofuel, Firewood

and Tanning

15,000,000 - - - -



































































55


Costs 2014 Activity

2014 Activity

Costs 2015 Activity

2015 Activity

Costs

Plantation

Department of Planning Research and Statistics

Flood and

Erosion

Control

Project

Sand fill erosion

prone and erect

retaining walls in

2 affected sites

54,000,000

Sand fill

erosion prone

and erect

retaining walls

in 2 affected

sites

54,000,000

Sand fill erosion

prone and erect

retaining walls in 6

affected sites

162,000,000

Construct Kurnar

Asabe Flood

Control drainage

and mini bridge

61,733,000

Construct

Kurnar Asabe

Flood Control

drainage and

mini bridge

61,733,000

Construct Kurnar

Asabe Flood

Control drainage

and mini bridge

61,733,000

Department of Pollution control

Industrial

Waste

Management

and Control

Procure

Laboratory

equipment and

Chemicals for

Food, soil and air

quality control

10,000,000

Procure

Laboratory

equipment and

Chemicals for

Food, soil and

air quality

control

10,000,000

Procure

Laboratory

equipment and

Chemicals for

Food, soil and air

quality control

10,000,000

Secondary

Waste

Management

and control

- -

Conduct

feasibility study

for land

acquisition

15,000,000 - -

- - - - Design and

construct 3 300,000,000


























































56


Costs 2014 Activity

2014 Activity

Costs 2015 Activity

2015 Activity

Costs

secondary

treatment plants.

Procure Gully

Emptier for

sewage and night

soil disposal

10,000,000

Procure Gully

Emptier for

sewage and

night soil

disposal

10,000,000

Procure Gully

Emptier for sewage

and night soil

disposal

10,000,000

Procure Night Soil

Van and Disposal

sites

10,000,000

Procure Night

Soil Van and

Disposal sites

10,000,000

Procure Night Soil

Van and Disposal

sites

10,000,000

Drainage

Evacuation

and

Maintenance

Project

Rehabilitate and

Evacuation of

Drainages

40,000,000

Rehabilitate

and Evacuation

of Drainages

40,000,000

Rehabilitate and

Evacuation of

Drainages

50,000,000


































57

Kano State REMASAB MTSS 2013 to 2014



Costs 2014 Activity

2014 Activity

Costs 2015 Activity

2015 Activity

Costs

Industrial Plantation /Forest

enrichment Planting

Establish 30ha

Gum Arabic

Plantation

10,000,000

Establish 20ha

Gum Arabic

Plantation

11,320,660

Establish 30ha

Gum Arabic

Plantation

11,320,660

Municipal Solid waste

management and

Sanitation

Maintain100

Trucks

{Purchase

Batteries and

Tires}

55,000,000

Maintain100

Trucks

{Purchase

Batteries and

Tires}

55,000,000

Maintain100

Trucks

{Purchase

Batteries and

Tires}

55,000,000

Procure Heavy


Procure Heavy


Procure Heavy


Construct

Diesel Refilling

Station

25,000,000 - - - -

Construct

Dumpsites 25,000,000

Construct

Dumpsites 25,000,000 - 25,000,000

Construct

Micro

composting

Plant

100,000,000

Construct

Micro

composting

Plant

75,000,000

Construct

Micro

composting

Plant

75,000,000

Procure refuse

liter bins and

street working

materials

24,000,000

Procure refuse

liter bins and

street working

materials

24,000,000

Procure refuse

liter bins and

street working

materials

24,000,000

Domestic Waste Conduct daily - Conduct daily - Conduct daily -

58


Costs 2014 Activity

2014 Activity

Costs 2015 Activity

2015 Activity

Costs

Management evacuation of

240 approved

collection

centers.

evacuation of

240 approved

collection

centers.

evacuation of

240 approved

collection

centers.

Medical and Hospital Waste

Management

Evacuate and

dispose waste

from 10 major

hospitals in the

metropolis

weekly.

-

Evacuate and

dispose waste

from 10 major

hospitals in the

metropolis

weekly.

-

Evacuate and

dispose waste

from 10 major

hospitals in the

metropolis

weekly.

-


Conduct

fumigates and

spray 88

political wards

of the

metropolis

-

Conduct

fumigates and

spray 88

political wards

of the

metropolis

-

Conduct

fumigates and

spray 88

political wards

of the

metropolis

-

Indoor Residual Spraying

(IRS)

Procure

chemical and

Equipment for

Indoor

Residual

Spraying in 88

Communities

100,000,000

Procure

chemical and

Equipment for

Indoor

Residual

Spraying in 88

Communities

100,000,000

Procure

chemical and

Equipment for

Indoor

Residual

Spraying in 88

Communities

100,000,000

59

Sustainable Kano Project MTSS 2013 to 2014



Costs 2014 Activity

2014 Activity

Costs 2015 Activity

2015 Activity

Costs

Drainage

Construction

and

rehabilitation

Construct 15 km

of drainages

through

community

partnerships

100,000,000

Construct 20 km

of drainages

through

community

partnerships

115,000,000

Construct 50 km

of drainages

through community

partnerships

250,000,000

Provide thematic

Maps of Kano

State

7,000,000

Provide thematic

Maps of Kano

State

3,000,000

Provide thematic

Maps of Kano

State

5,000,000

Implement

Sustainable

Urban Mobility

Project

3,500,000

Implement

Sustainable

Urban Mobility

Project

2,500,000

Implement

Sustainable Urban

Mobility Project

5,000,000

Waste to

Wealth

Initiatives

Support

Community

Waste to Wealth

activities

15,000,000

Support

Community Waste

to Wealth

activities

5,000,000

Support

Community Waste

to Wealth activities

10,000,000

Public

awareness on

environmental

issues.

Public

Mobilization on

print and

Electronic Media

for Community

10,000,000

Public

Mobilization on

print and

Electronic Media

for Community

10,000,000

Public Mobilization

on print and

Electronic Media

for Community

involvement

15,000,000





























































60


Costs 2014 Activity

2014 Activity

Costs 2015 Activity

2015 Activity

Costs

involvement involvement

Community

environmental

Health

Initiatives

Support

Community

Water Boreholes

schemes

14,500,000

Support

Community Water

Boreholes

schemes

14,500,000

Support

Community Water

Boreholes

schemes

30,000,000

School of Hygiene MTSS 2013 to 2014



Costs 2014 Activity

2014 Activity

Costs

2015

Activity

2015 Activity

Costs

Integration of

environment

issues in school

curriculum

Construction of

the Convocation

Square

15,000,000 - - - -

Provision of the

Laboratory

Equipment

10,000,000

Provision of the

Laboratory

Equipment

10,000,000 - -

Construction

Hostel

Accommodation

50,000,000

Construction

Hostel

Accommodation

50,000,000 - -

Construction of

Laundry for the

School of Hygiene

-

Construction of

Laundry for the

School of

Hygiene

5,000,000 - -

Accreditation of 5,000,000 Accreditation of 5,000,000 5,000,000















../../../../AppData/Local/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.Outlook/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.Outlook/AppData/HP/Desktop/Kano%20Environment%20MTSS/%5bKano%20Environment%20MTSS%202013%20to%202015%20Harmonized.xlsx%5d4.1.1.1a!f10





../../../../AppData/Local/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.Outlook/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.Outlook/AppData/HP/Desktop/Kano%20Environment%20MTSS/%5bKano%20Environment%20MTSS%202013%20to%202015%20Harmonized.xlsx%5d4.1.1.1b!f10







../../../../AppData/Local/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.Outlook/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.Outlook/AppData/HP/Desktop/Kano%20Environment%20MTSS/%5bKano%20Environment%20MTSS%202013%20to%202015%20Harmonized.xlsx%5d4.1.1.1c!f10







../../../../AppData/Local/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.Outlook/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.Outlook/AppData/HP/Desktop/Kano%20Environment%20MTSS/%5bKano%20Environment%20MTSS%202013%20to%202015%20Harmonized.xlsx%5d4.1.1.1d!f10








../../../../AppData/Local/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.Outlook/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.Outlook/AppData/HP/Desktop/Kano%20Environment%20MTSS/%5bKano%20Environment%20MTSS%202013%20to%202015%20Harmonized.xlsx%5d4.1.1.1e!f10



61


Costs 2014 Activity

2014 Activity

Costs

2015

Activity

2015 Activity

Costs

Programmes Programmes Accreditation

of

Programmes

- 5,000,000

Facilitate

environmental

and hygienic

education into

school

curriculum

5,000,000 - -

KNAP MTSS 2013 to 2014



Costs 2014 Activity

2014 Activity

Costs 2015 Activity 2015 Activity Costs

Industrial

Plantation

/Forest

enrichment

Planting

Establish

30ha Gum

Arabic

Plantation

10,000,000

Establish

20ha Gum

Arabic

Plantation

11,320,660

Establish 30ha

Gum Arabic

Plantation

11,320,660

Enrichment

planting of 20

ha deforested

forest and

Sustainable

Management

29,000,000

Enrichment

planting of 20

ha deforested

forest and

Sustainable

Management

16,620,850

Enrichment

planting of 20 ha

deforested forest

and Sustainable

Management of

Shelterbelts

16,620,850






../../../../AppData/Local/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.Outlook/AppData/Local/Microsoft/Windows/Temporary%20Internet%20Files/Content.Outlook/AppData/HP/Desktop/Kano%20Environment%20MTSS/%5bKano%20Environment%20MTSS%202013%20to%202015%20Harmonized.xlsx%5d4.1.1.1f!f10































62


Costs 2014 Activity

2014 Activity


of Shelterbelts

Estate

of Shelterbelts

Estate

Estate

Silvicultural

management of

200km

shelterbelts and

forest estates

Conduct

Inventory

Survey on

Forest

Resource

Utilization

12,100,000

Conduct

Inventory

Survey on

Forest

Resource

Utilization

12,100,000 - -

Establishment of

60km

shelterbelts

Acquire 20km

x 30m land; 18,000,000

Acquire 20km

x 30m land; 18,000,000

Acquire 20km x

30m land; 18,000,000

Survey and

demarcate the

land;

12,000,000

Survey and

demarcate the

land;

14,310,000

Survey and

demarcate the

land;

14,310,000

- - Plant 79,980


Plant 79,980


- -

Provide

fencing of

20km in

blocks.

15,875,000 Provide fencing

of 20km in blocks. 15,875,000

Production of

9million tree

seedlings

Upgrade

Nursery and

Produce 1

million

assorted tree

seedlings;

11,000,000

Upgrade

Nursery and

Produce 1

million

assorted tree

seedlings;

14,082,970

Upgrade Nursery

and Produce 1

million assorted

tree seedlings;

14,082,970




























































63


Costs 2014 Activity

2014 Activity


Private

Forestry/Orchard

Development

Train 300

farmers and

25 extension

officers;

5,000,000

Train 300

farmers and

25 extension

officers;

7,933,000

Train 300

farmers and 25

extension

officers;

7,933,000

Rehabilitate

KNAP Office 14,000,000 - - -

-

Sensitize the

farmers

through radio

(52

times/year),

TV (13

times/year),

pamphlets

and posters.

-

Sensitize the

farmers

through radio

(52

times/year),

TV (13

times/year),

pamphlets

and posters.

3,923,816 Rehabilitate

KNAP Office

3,923,816





































64

Support 200

farmers from

the 44LGAs

with

Seedlings,

Working

Materials,

Fencing

Material,

Insecticides

and technical

inputs to

establish

wood

lots/orchards

5,000,000

Support 200

farmers from

the 44LGAs

with

Seedlings,

Working

Materials,

Fencing

Material,

Insecticides

and technical

inputs to

establish

wood

lots/orchards

5,000,000 - -

Sustainable

honey

production

Procure 3,000

local hives,

500KTB and

500

Langstroth

hives;

15,000,000

Procure

3,000 local

hives, 500KTB

and 500

Langstroth

hives;

24,530,000

Procure 3,000

local hives,

500KTB and 500

Langstroth hives;

24,530,000

- -

Procure

honey

extraction,

processing

equipment

390,900 - -























































65


Costs 2014 Activity

2014 Activity


and packaging

containers;

- -

Set up 2 new

apiaries and

maintain the

existing 3.3

times/year),

pamphlets

and posters.

2,435,000 - -

Promotion of

Alternative

source Energy

Procure 1350

energy-saving

stoves;

5,000,000

Procure 1500

energy-saving

stoves;

5,481,525

Procure 1500

energy-saving

stoves;

5,481,525

- -

Train 80

women on the

usage of the

stoves

85,000

Train 80 women

on the usage of

the stoves

85,000





























66


Department of Ecology/Forestry

Capital Budget

Accounts Description 2012 (Jan- Dec) 2013 2014 2015

2302006 Purchase of Medical Equipment 5,000,000.00 - -

2302012 Purchase of Agric Equipment 40,000,000.00 49,713,500.00 49,713,500.00

2302013

Purchase of Educational

Institutions Furniture

- - -

2302014 Other Equipment - 9,863,000.00 -

2303000

Land & Buildings (Expense) -

General

- - -

2303001

Compensation on Land and

Buildings

2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00 2,000,000.00

2303002 Construction of Offices - - -

2303003 Construction of Staff Quarter - - -

2303004 Construction of Sporting Facilities - - -

2303005

Construction of Medical/Health

Centres

- - -

2303006

Construction of Educational

Institution Buildings

- - -

2303007

Construction of

Mosques/Islamiyya Schools

- - -

2303008

Construction of other

Infrastructures

- - -

2306000

Construction Of Other

Infrastructure - General

- - -

2306003 Other Infrastructure 57,000,000.00 47,000,000.00 47,000,000.00

Total - 104,000,000.00 108,576,500.00 98,713,500.00

67


Department of Planning Research and Statistics

Capital Budget


2301000

Transport Equipment -

General

- - -

2301001 Purchase of Motor Vehicles - - -

2301002 Other Transport Equipment - - -

2302000

Purchase Of Furniture &

Equipment - General

- - -

2302001 Purchase of Office Furniture - - -



2303004

Construction of Sporting

Facilities

- - -

2303005


Centres

- - -

2303006



- - -

2303007

Construction of


- - -

2303008


Infrastructures

- - -

2306000



- - -

2306003 Other Infrastructure 115,733,000.00 115,733,000.00 223,733,000.00

Total - 115,733,000.00 115,733,000.00 223,733,000.00

68


Department of Pollution Control

Capital Budget


2301000


General

- - -

2301001 Purchase of Motor Vehicles 15,000,000 15,000,000 15,000,000

2301002 Other Transport Equipment - - -

2302000


Equipment - General

- - -


2302003

Purchase of Computer

Equipment

- - -

2302006

Purchase of Medical

Equipment

10,000,000 10,000,000 10,000,000

2303001


Buildings

5,000,000 20,000,000 5,000,000



2306000



- - -

2306003 Other Infrastructure 40,000,000 40,000,000 350,000,000

Total - 70,000,000 85,000,000 380,000,000

69


KNAP

Capital Budget

Accounts Description 2012

(Jan- Dec) 2013 2014 2015

2302012 Purchase of Agric Equipment 82,000,000 96,657,196 89,906,296

2302013



- - -

2302014 Other Equipment 5,000,000 5,566,525 5,566,525

2303000

Land & Buildings (Expense) -

General

- - -

2303001


Buildings

18,000,000 18,000,000 18,000,000

2303002 Construction of Offices 14,000,000 - -


2303004 Construction of Sporting Facilities - - -

2303005


Centres

- - -

2303006



- - -

2303007

Construction of Mosques/Islamiyya

Schools

- - -

2303008


Infrastructures

- - -

2306000



- - 700,000


Total - 136,100,000 153,198,721 131,047,821

70


REMASAB

Capital Budget


2301000


General

- - -

2301001 Purchase of Motor Vehicles - - -

2301002 Other Transport Equipment 305,000,000 355,000,000 355,000,000

2302000


Equipment - General

- - -


2302003


Equipment

- - -

2302006

Purchase of Medical

Equipment

100,000,000 100,000,000 100,000,000

2302014 Other Equipment 24,000,000 24,000,000 24,000,000

2303008


Infrastructures

- - -

2306000



- - -


Total - 579,000,000 579,000,000 579,000,000

71


Sustainable Project

Capital Budget


2302003


Equipment

- - -

2302013



- - -

2302014 Other Equipment 7,000,000 3,000,000 5,000,000

2303000

Land & Buildings (Expense)

- General

- - -

2303001


Buildings

- - -

2303007

Construction of


- - -

2303008


Infrastructures

- - -

2306000



- - -


Total - 150,000,000 150,000,000 315,000,000

72


2302003


Equipment

- - -

2302006

Purchase of Medical

Equipment

10,000,000 10,000,000 -

2302012

Purchase of Agric

Equipment

- - -

2302013



10,000,000 10,000,000 5,000,000


2303004

Construction of Sporting

Facilities

- - -

2303005

Construction of

Medical/Health Centres

- - -

2303006



65,000,000 55,000,000 -

2303007

Construction of


- - -

2303008


Infrastructures

- - -

2306000



- - -

2306003 Other Infrastructure - - -

Total - 85,000,000 75,000,000 5,000,000

Kaan noo eSSttaatte EEnnvviirroonmmeenntt … noo eSSttaatte EEnnvviirroonmmeenntt SSeeccttoorr 2013...

Documents

Transcript of Kaan noo eSSttaatte EEnnvviirroonmmeenntt … noo eSSttaatte EEnnvviirroonmmeenntt SSeeccttoorr 2013...