k11_19790123.pdf
3
Release Date; January 23, 1979 HOLDOVER FLOAT AS PERCENT OF DOLLAR AMOUNT RTCFLVTO OCT 1978 UEL . 7: :U£C 1 3 tifcC -JLA-UEL 20 ..21; rQfcL a Dec ^8 -JAN ; RAN& ELI RANK ELI &AW& ELI MM ELI MB* ELI RANK ELI RANK ELI -JAN ; RAN& BOSTON 1 . 4 1 34 1.92 27 1 . 15 41 1 . 0 6 35 1 .16 35 1 . 2 3 37 1 . 4 3 33 LEWISTUN 0 . 3 4 48 0.03 46 0 . 0 7 48 0 . 0 7 46 0 . 0 7 47 0 . 0 5 46 0 I.IO 46 WINDSOR LOCKS 1 . 1 3 40 0.67 45 5 12 1 3 . 3 9 4 3 . 4 5 18 5 .92 13 3 . 0 1 19 NEW YORK 2 .Ob 26 1.87 28 2 . 3 9 31 4 .23 16 O.OL 46 0. .01 47 3 . 8 9 16 BUFFALO 7 .97 4 6.21 8 4 .80 17 3 , . 06 21 5,.15 13 3 , . 86 19 1 .45 32 JERICHO 3 .71 14 4 .94 10 6 , , 62 10 0.00 47 4 , . 11 16 13. .19 4 5 . 3 4 10 CRANFOKD 8, .32 3 2 .79 21 5..37 14 0.89 37 0 , , 7 5 42 16.54 3 14 .34 2 UT1CA 0< • 6 6 43 1 . 4 1 36 4 , » V 3 15 0. ,00 47 1 . 3 9 32 12. 77 5 5 .68 9 PHILADELPHIA 2 . . 11 25 2 .22 23 4. 48 18 2. 55 22 2 . 1 3 26 9. 71 9 8 . 1 7 8 CLEVELAND X. 14 39 0 . 7 7 44 0.93 42 0.72 41 1. 39 32 1. 10 38 1 .00 39 CINCINNATI 4 . 84 8 6 . 6 2 6 10. 26 5 9. 03 7 1 1 . 0 1 7 11. 55 7 8 . 5 5 6 PITTSBURGH 0. 37 47 0 . 2 7 47 0. 57 46 0. 76 40 0 . 5 5 44 0. 54 43 0 .00 47 COLUMBUS 2 . 8 9 19 4 . 0 4 12 2 . 7 3 27 4. 41 15 2. 48 23 1 . 6 9 31 1 .33 37 RICHMOND 2 . 2 8 22 2 . 0 6 25 1 . 9 3 35 2. 25 25 1 . 8 9 27 1. 94 27 0 .65 43 BALTIMORE 1. 37 36 1 .79 31 2 . 2 1 33 1. 13 34 1. 38 34 4 . 12 16 5 . 3 3 11 CHARLOTTE 0. 71 42 1 .52 34 2. 11 34 0. 56 43 1. 01 38 3 . 3 9 20 3 . 8 1 17 COLUMBIA 2 . 18 23 1 .66 33 1. 24 40 1. 47 31 0 . 7 2 43 0. 75 41 1 .84 25 CHARLESTON 1. 52 33 2 .99 18 0 . 9 1 43 0. 99 36 0. 78 41 0. 88 40 0 . 9 0 41 ATLANTA 3. 73 13 13 . 2 0 3 11. ti2 3 1 0 . 0 9 6 14. 98 1 5. 31 14 10 . 8 1 3 BIRMINGHAM 1 . 5 9 31 1 .75 32 2 . 4 6 30 1. 56 30 1. 44 31 2 . 0 0 26 2 . 1 6 23 JACKSONVILLE 11. 46 1 15 . 3 7 2 3 . 4 0 22 3. 21 20 2. 85 20 1. 42 34 1 .38 36 NASHVILLE 2. 16 24 1 .06 41 3 . 2 3 24 1. 39 32 5 . 9 0 11 1. 75 29 1 .47 31 NEW ORLEANS 2. 01 27 3 .31 16 6. 95 6 6 . 9 0 8 2 . 3 4 25 4. 11 17 9 . 0 0 4 MIAMI 3. 33 17 5 . 3 6 9 4 . 8.1 16 6 . 6 1 9 4. 97 15 4 . 2 9 15 4 .75 13 CHICAGO 3. 95 11 7 .09 5 7. 10 9 4. 58 13 5. 64 1* 12. 02 6 4 .46 15 DETROIT 2. 69 20 1 .94 26 5 . 4 3 13 2 . 3 0 24 14. 89 2 2. 13 25 2 . 3 6 22 DES MOINES 3. 43 16 1 .80 30 2. 55 29 2 . 3 5 23 2 . 62 22 3. 10 21 1 .62 28 INDIANAPOLIS 1. 23 37 3 .46 14 3 . 8 8 20 2. 00 26 1. 03 36 1 . 3 1 35 1 .41 35 MILWAUKEE 3 . 12 18 2 . 4 5 22 3 . 2 9 23 3 . 3 3 18 3 . 38 19 4. 09 18 2 .93 20 ST. LOUIS 5 . 06 7 4 . 6 3 11 10. 71 4 1 8 . 8 0 2 12. 84 6 0 . 0 0 46 1 .02 38 LITTLE RUCK 1. 59 31 3 .02 17 3. 63 21 4. 01 17 4. 01 17 56 22 4 .82 12 LOUISVILLE 1. 15 38 2 .10 24 3. 04 26 1. 89 28 1. 72 30 5. 99 12 1 .73 26 MEMPHIS 10. 72 2 2 1 . 8 2 1 16. 25 1 2 9 . 9 1 1 13. 70 4 16. 74 1 4 .35 14 MINNEAPOLIS 3. 58 15 1 . 5 2 34 7. 75 7 4 . 6 1 12 14 s 73 3 LU. 46 8 1 .67 27 HELENA 2 . 38 21 6 . 2 9 7 2 . 6 7 28 4 . 9 9 11 1. 03 36 1. 75 29 8 . 3 9 7 KANSAS CITY 0. 56 44 1 .04 42 1. 79 36 3. 31 19 0. 84 39 0. 60 42 0 . 7 8 42 DENVER 4. 64 9 3 . 4 5 15 1. 75 37 1. 57 29 2. 63 21 1. 51 33 0 . 9 2 40 OKLAHOMA C I T Y 4. 35 10 1 .28 37 0. 83 44 0. 59 42 1. 85 28 0. 36 45 0 . 0 0 47 OMAHA 1. 63 29 2 .81 20 2. 23 32 1. 93 27 2 . 38 24 2. 28 24 3 . 0 7 18 DALLAS 1. 84 28 1 .86 29 7. 35 8 1 3 . 2 7 5 8 . 0 0 10 7 . 2 1 10 1 .85 24 EL PASO 0 ,49 46 0 .84 43 0. 58 45 0. 27 45 0. 19 46 1. 59 32 0 .38 45 HOUSTON 5 . 5 6 6 1 .19 38 4. 03 19 1. 20 33 1 3 . 0 1 5 0 . 9 5 3? 1 .53 30 SAN ANTONIO 3. 80 12 2 . 9 5 19 5. 65 11 5 . 4 0 10 8. 03 9 6. 92 11 15 . 0 9 1 SAN FRANCISCO 1. 39 35 1 .15 39 1. 26 39 0 . 8 1 39 1. 82 29 1.26 36 1 .60 29 LOS ANGELES 1. 62 30 1 . 1 4 40 3 . 1 1 25 4 . 4 8 14 5. 11 14 1. 62 28 2 . 6 5 21 PORTLAND 1, 02 41 7 . 6 9 4 1. 72 38 0. 89 37 0.81 40 C . 4 1 23 i .43 33 SALT LAKE CITY 7 . 0 1 5 3 . 6 6 13 12. 94 2 13.90 3 8. 66 6 17 = .06 2 , 8 .88 5 SEATTLE 0.53 45 0 . 5 8 46 0. 47 47 0.5* 44 0.48 45 0 . , 4 4 44 0 .53 44 OVERALL SYSTEM 2. 79 3 .33 4.15 4«,40 4« ,00 4. ,22 3 .94 tim- eLI ' 1.01 0.13 2.51 0.00 OmOO 0*00 o.oo 0.00 9.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 o.oo 2.84 O.OO 2.60 0.54 0.87 5.62 1.76 9.59 3.70 6.11 0.00 3.97 2.18 1.89 1.26 4.13 5.4* 1.02 2.10 2.33 6.21 0.49 2.41 1.44 0.43 3.08 - 1.22 3D 37 15 38 3D 38 38 38 2 38 38 38 3* 13 38 14 33 34 5 22 1 10 4 38 9 19 21 26 8 6 29 20 17 3 35 16 25 36 it a i:: s 3 2 3.45 Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
Transcript of k11_19790123.pdf
-
Release Date; January 23, 1979
HOLDOVER FLOAT AS PERCENT OF DOLLAR AMOUNT RTCFLVTO
OCT 1978 UEL . 7 : :UC 1 3 tifcC -JLA-UEL 20 ..21; rQfcL a Dec ^8 - JAN ; RAN& E L I RANK E L I &AW& E L I M M E L I M B * E L I RANK E L I R A N K E L I
- JAN ; RAN&
BOSTON 1 . 4 1 34 1 . 9 2 27 1 . 1 5 4 1 1 . 0 6 35 1 . 1 6 35 1 . 2 3 3 7 1 . 4 3 33 LEWISTUN 0 . 3 4 48 0 . 0 3 46 0 . 0 7 48 0 . 0 7 46 0 . 0 7 4 7 0 . 0 5 4 6 0 I . I O 4 6 WINDSOR LOCKS 1 . 1 3 40 0 . 6 7 45 5 12 13 . 3 9 4 3 . 4 5 1 8 5 . 9 2 1 3 3 . 0 1 19
NEW YORK 2 .Ob 2 6 1 . 8 7 28 2 . 3 9 3 1 4 . 2 3 1 6 O . O L 4 6 0 . . 0 1 47 3 . 8 9 1 6 BUFFALO 7 .97 4 6 . 2 1 8 4 . 8 0 17 3 , . 0 6 2 1 5, .15 1 3 3 , . 8 6 19 1 . 4 5 32 JERICHO 3 . 7 1 14 4 . 9 4 10 6 , , 6 2 10 0 . 0 0 4 7 4 , . 1 1 1 6 1 3 . . 19 4 5 . 3 4 10 C R A N F O K D 8 , .32 3 2 . 7 9 21 5. . 37 14 0 . 8 9 3 7 0 , , 7 5 4 2 1 6 . 5 4 3 14 . 3 4 2 UT1CA 0< 66 4 3 1 . 4 1 3 6 4 , V 3 15 0 . ,00 47 1 . 3 9 32 12. 77 5 5 . 6 8 9
PHILADELPHIA 2 . . 1 1 25 2 . 2 2 2 3 4 . 48 18 2 . 55 22 2 . 1 3 2 6 9 . 71 9 8 . 1 7 8 CLEVELAND X. 14 39 0 . 7 7 44 0 . 9 3 42 0 . 7 2 4 1 1 . 39 3 2 1 . 10 38 1 . 0 0 3 9
CINCINNATI 4 . 84 8 6 . 6 2 6 1 0 . 2 6 5 9 . 03 7 1 1 . 01 7 1 1 . 55 7 8 . 5 5 6 PITTSBURGH 0 . 37 47 0 . 2 7 47 0 . 57 4 6 0 . 76 40 0 . 5 5 4 4 0 . 54 4 3 0 . 0 0 47 COLUMBUS 2 . 89 19 4 . 0 4 1 2 2 . 7 3 2 7 4 . 4 1 15 2 . 48 2 3 1 . 6 9 3 1 1 . 3 3 37
RICHMOND 2 . 2 8 2 2 2 . 0 6 2 5 1 . 9 3 35 2 . 25 2 5 1 . 8 9 2 7 1 . 9 4 2 7 0 . 6 5 4 3 B A L T I M O R E 1 . 37 36 1 . 7 9 3 1 2 . 2 1 33 1 . 13 3 4 1 . 38 3 4 4 . 12 16 5 . 3 3 11 CHARLOTTE 0 . 7 1 42 1 . 5 2 3 4 2 . 11 34 0 . 56 4 3 1 . 0 1 3 8 3 . 3 9 20 3 . 8 1 17 COLUMBIA 2 . 18 23 1 . 6 6 33 1 . 24 40 1 . 47 3 1 0 . 7 2 4 3 0 . 75 4 1 1 . 8 4 25 C H A R L E S T O N 1 . 52 33 2 . 9 9 18 0 . 9 1 4 3 0 . 9 9 36 0 . 78 4 1 0 . 88 4 0 0 . 9 0 4 1
ATLANTA 3 . 73 13 13 . 2 0 3 1 1 . ti2 3 1 0 . 0 9 6 1 4 . 9 8 1 5 . 3 1 14 10 . 8 1 3 BIRMINGHAM 1 . 5 9 3 1 1 . 7 5 32 2 . 4 6 3 0 1 . 56 30 1 . 44 31 2 . 00 2 6 2 . 1 6 23 JACKSONVILLE 1 1 . 46 1 15 . 3 7 2 3 . 4 0 22 3 . 2 1 20 2 . 8 5 2 0 1 . 42 3 4 1 . 3 8 36 NASHVILLE 2 . 16 2 4 1 . 0 6 4 1 3 . 2 3 24 1 . 39 32 5 . 9 0 11 1 . 75 29 1 . 4 7 3 1 NEW ORLEANS 2 . 01 27 3 . 3 1 16 6 . 95 6 6 . 9 0 8 2 . 3 4 2 5 4 . 11 17 9 . 0 0 4 MIAMI 3 . 33 17 5 . 3 6 9 4 . 8.1 16 6 . 6 1 9 4 . 97 15 4 . 29 15 4 . 7 5 13
CHICAGO 3 . 95 1 1 7 . 0 9 5 7 . 10 9 4 . 58 13 5 . 64 1 * 1 2 . 0 2 6 4 . 4 6 15 DETROIT 2 . 69 2 0 1 . 9 4 26 5 . 43 13 2 . 3 0 24 1 4 . 89 2 2 . 13 25 2 . 3 6 22 DES MOINES 3 . 43 16 1 . 8 0 30 2 . 55 29 2 . 35 2 3 2 . 62 22 3 . 10 2 1 1 . 6 2 28 INDIANAPOLIS 1 . 23 37 3 . 4 6 14 3 . 8 8 20 2 . 0 0 26 1 . 03 3 6 1 . 31 35 1 . 4 1 35 MILWAUKEE 3 . 12 18 2 . 4 5 22 3 . 2 9 23 3 . 33 18 3 . 38 19 4 . 09 18 2 . 9 3 20
S T . LOUIS 5 . 06 7 4 . 6 3 11 1 0 . 7 1 4 1 8 . 8 0 2 1 2 . 8 4 6 0 . 0 0 46 1 . 0 2 38 LITTLE RUCK 1 . 59 3 1 3 . 0 2 17 3 . 63 2 1 4 . 0 1 17 4 . 0 1 17 56 22 4 . 8 2 12 LOUISVILLE 1 . 15 38 2 . 1 0 24 3 . 0 4 26 1 . 89 28 1 . 72 3 0 5 . 99 12 1 . 7 3 26 MEMPHIS 1 0 . 72 2 2 1 . 8 2 1 1 6 . 25 1 2 9 . 9 1 1 1 3 . 70 4 1 6 . 74 1 4 . 3 5 14
MINNEAPOLIS 3 . 58 15 1 . 5 2 34 7 . 7 5 7 4 . 6 1 12 14 s 73 3 L U . 46 8 1 . 6 7 2 7 HELENA 2 . 38 2 1 6 . 2 9 7 2 . 67 28 4 . 99 11 1 . 03 36 1 . 75 29 8 . 3 9 7
KANSAS CITY 0 . 56 44 1 . 0 4 42 1 . 79 36 3 . 3 1 19 0 . 8 4 3 9 0 . 60 42 0 . 7 8 42 DENVER 4 . 64 9 3 . 4 5 15 1 . 75 37 1 . 57 29 2 . 63 21 1 . 51 33 0 . 9 2 40 OKLAHOMA CITY 4 . 35 10 1 . 2 8 37 0 . 83 4 4 0 . 59 42 1 . 85 2 8 0 . 36 4 5 0 . 0 0 47 OMAHA 1 . 63 29 2 . 8 1 20 2 . 2 3 32 1 . 93 27 2 . 38 24 2 . 28 24 3 . 0 7 18
DALLAS 1 . 8 4 28 1 . 8 6 29 7 . 35 8 1 3 . 27 5 8 . 00 10 7 . 2 1 10 1 . 8 5 24 EL PASO 0 , 49 46 0 . 8 4 43 0 . 58 45 0 . 27 45 0 . 19 46 1 . 59 32 0 . 3 8 45 HOUSTON 5 . 56 6 1 . 1 9 38 4 . 03 19 1 . 2 0 3 3 1 3 . 01 5 0 . 95 3 ? 1 . 5 3 30 SAN ANTONIO 3 . 80 12 2 . 9 5 19 5 . 65 1 1 5 . 4 0 10 8 . 03 9 6 . 92 11 15 . 0 9 1
SAN FRANCISCO 1 . 39 35 1 . 1 5 39 1 . 26 39 0 . 8 1 39 1 . 82 29 1 . 2 6 36 1 . 6 0 29 LOS ANGELES 1 . 62 30 1 . 1 4 40 3 . 11 25 4 . 4 8 14 5 . 11 14 1 . 62 28 2 . 6 5 2 1 PORTLAND 1 , 02 4 1 7 . 6 9 4 1 . 72 3 8 0 . 89 37 0 . 8 1 40 C . 4 1 23 i . 4 3 3 3 SALT LAKE CITY 7 . 0 1 5 3 . 6 6 13 1 2 . 94 2 1 3 . 9 0 3 8 . 66 6 17 = .06 2 , 8 . 8 8 5 SEATTLE 0 . 5 3 45 0 . 5 8 4 6 0 . 47 47 0 . 5 * 4 4 0 . 4 8 45 0 . , 4 4 4 4 0 . 5 3 4 4
OVERALL SYSTEM 2 . 79 3 . 3 3 4 . 1 5 4 , 4 0 4 , 0 0 4 . ,22 3 . 9 4
t i m -e L I ' 1.01 0 . 1 3 2 .51 0.00 OmOO 0 * 0 0 o.oo 0.00 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 o.oo 2 . 8 4 O.OO 2.60 0 . 5 4 0 . 8 7 5 . 6 2 1 . 7 6 9 . 5 9 3 . 7 0 6.11 0 . 0 0 3 . 9 7 2.18 1 . 8 9 1.26 4 . 1 3 5 . 4 * 1.02 2.10 2 . 3 3 6.21 0 . 4 9 2 . 4 1 1 . 4 4 0 . 4 3 3 . 0 8
- 1.22
3D 3 7 1 5 3 8 3D 3 8 3 8 3 8
2 3 8 3 8 3 8 3 * 1 3 3 8 1 4 3 3 3 4
5 22
1 10
4 3 8
9 1 9 21 26
8 6
2 9 20 17
3 3 5 16 2 5 3 6 it a i:: s
3 2 3 . 4 5
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-
C.HEf,fiS MELOOVtR AS PERCENT UP.
OCT 1976 1976 DEC 7 - 1 E L I RANK E L I RANK E L I &A&& E L I RANK
BOSTON 2 . 2 3 29 2 . 6 4 27 1 . 7 1 39 1 .07 37 LEW1ST0N 0 . 2 5 47 0 . 0 2 47 0 . 0 7 48 0 . 0 7 46 WINDSOR LOCKS 2 . 7 3 23 1 . 4 1 37 7 . 9 b 11 1 5 . 8 5 3
NEW YORK 8 . 7 3 6 1 0 . 8 1 3 15 .02 3 1 2 . 9 0 7 BUFFALO 4 . 6 1 14 2 . 8 0 26 3 .5a 23 2 . 5 7 24 JERICHO 2 . 6 4 24 5 . 4 6 12 6 . 1 5 14 0 . 0 0 47 CRANFORO 9 . 9 7 3 3 . 3 2 22 5 . 3 0 20 0 . 8 b 39 UT1CA 1 . 5 1 38 2 . 5 6 29 5 . 5 1 18 0 . 0 0 47
PHILADELPHIA 1 .35 40 1 . 3 5 40 2 . 0 4 36 1 .43 33 CLEVELAND 0 . 3 8 46 0 . 3 0 46 0 . 3 5 46 0 . 3 6 43
CINCINNATI 7 . 1 0 8 8 . 4 7 6 13 . c>2 6 1 1 . 1 b 10 PITTSBURGH 0 . 6 5 43 0 . 3 4 45 0 . 9 3 43 0 . 9 9 38 COLUMBUS 2 . 4 1 27 5 . 1 1 15 2 . 3 4 34 3 . 7 6 20
RICHMOND 3 . 8 3 17 2 . 9 0 25 3 . 4 6 24 4 . 5 0 17 BALTIMORE 2 . 5 4 25 2 . 2 7 32 2 . 4 1 33 1 . 5 0 31 CHARLOTTE 1 . 0 7 42 2 . 1 4 33 3 . 2 7 26 0 . 5 0 42 COLUMBIA 1 . 2 1 4 1 1 . 3 5 40 0 . 6 9 44 0 . 5 3 4 1 CHARLESTON 2 . 4 6 26 3 . 4 1 21 1 . 4 1 4 1 1 . 4 2 34
ATLANTA 3 . 9 5 16 1 6 . 6 7 2 14 . 66 5 12 .78 8 BIRMINGHAM 1 . 6 6 35 1 . 6 9 34 2 . t i c 28 1 .32 35 JACKSONVILLE 8 . 7 7 5 1 0 . 1 9 4 2 . 6 4 31 1 . 9 8 46 NASHVILLE 2 . 1 5 30 1 . 3 7 38 2 . 7 2 29 1 . 5 2 30 NEW ORLEANS 2 . 0 6 32 2 . 5 7 48 b . 12 10 1 7 . 3 1 2 MIAMI 1 . 9 2 33 3 . 5 0 19 3 . 3 0 25 3 . 7 2 21
CHICAGO 5 . 1 1 11 9 . 6 2 5 15 .45 2 7 . 4 7 13 DETROIT 4 . 7 5 12 3 . 4 3 20 5 . 7 7 16 4 . 0 2 19 DES MOINES 10 .25 1 5 . 6 7 11 6 . 9 9 13 8 . 2 5 11 INDIANAPOLIS 1 . 8 3 34 5 . 3 5 14 4 . 5 7 2 1 1 . 9 3 27 MILWAUKEE 8 . 2 * 7 7 . 8 1 7 12 .09 7 1 3 . 0 1 6
ST . LOUIS 4 . 6 2 13 4 . 0 9 16 6 . 5 1 9 12 .13 9 LITTLE ROCK 2 . 0 9 31 3 . 9 / 18 5 . 4 4 19 7 . 6 0 12 LOUISVILLE 1 .57 36 3 . 1 6 2J> 3 . 9 3 22 ' * 2 . 1 6 25 MEMPHIS 1 0 . 1 1 2 2 0 . 7 0 1 1 9 . 1 1 1 3 3 . 7 8 1
MINNEAPOLIS 3 . 2 3 16 1 . 3 5 40 7 . 4 2 12 5 . 1 2 16 HELENA 2 . 9 4 20 5 . 4 5 13 3.U3 47 3 . 6 2 22
KANSAS CITY 0 . 6 0 44 1 . 3 6 39 2 . 6 8 30 4 . 1 0 18 DENVER 6 . 1 3 9 4 . 0 4 17 2 . 1 5 35 1 . 9 0 28 OKLAHOMA CITY 5 . 8 7 10 1 . 5 9 35 1 .43 42 1 . 2 6 36 OMAHA 3 . 1 9 19 4 . 9 6 44 1 . 8 4 38 2 . 7 3 23
DALLAS 2 . 8 0 42 2 . 4 3 31 1 1 . 0 6 8 1 4 . 6 5 5 EL PASO 0 . 0 4 48 0 . 0 0 48 0 . 2 7 47 0 . 1 2 45 HOUSTON 2 . 3 6 28 0 . 6 0 43 1 .89 37 0 . 5 7 40 SAN ANTONIO 4 . 1 8 15 5 . 7 2 10 5 . 9 4 15 6 . 0 2 15
SAN FRANCISCO 0 . 5 2 45 0 . 1 4 44 0 . 4 0 45 0 . 2 8 44 LOS ANGELES 2 . 9 4 20 2 . 4 7 30 5 . 5 2 17 6 . 9 8 14 PORTLAND 1 .4 8 39 6 . 2 1 6 * . 4 3 32 1 . 5 0 3 1 SALT LAKE CITY 9 . 2 5 4 o . l 8 9 1 4 . 9 2 4 1 5 . 6 4 4 SEATTLE 1 .57 36 1 . 5 5 36 1 .45 40 1 . 5 4 29
OVERALL SYSTEM 3 . 9 6 4 . 5 6 6 . 4 0 6 . 0 1
E L I &AN& 1 . 2 3 39 0 . 0 8 47 5 .32 17
17.42 2 2 . 4 5 26 4 . 2 3 19 0 . 5 9 44 1 . 4 6 33 1 . 1 7 40 0 . 3 7 46
15 .03 4 0 . 9 4 4 1 2 . 0 0 28 3 . 2 3 20 1 .42 35 2 . 5 2 25 0 . 6 4 43 1 . 3 3 38
18 .54 1 1 . 4 9 34 1 .75 2 9 5 . 0 6 18 1 . 6 4 30 3 . 2 1 zl 9 . 2 9 11
12 .20 9 6 . 1 3 14 1 . 3 4 37
12. t t2 1 2 . 8 8 7
5 . 7 6 16 4 . 1 5 2 7
12 .92 6 1 4 . 4 4 5
2 . 9 8 23 0 . 8 9 42 3 . 1 0 22 1 . 6 3 31 2 . 6 6 24
16 .66 3 0 . 0 0 48 5 . 9 0 15 7 .69 12 0 . 4 0 45 7 . 0 2 13 1 . 4 5 34
11 .0b 10 1 . 4 2 35
Ptfc C l - U t t 27 E L I M m E L I 2 . 2 5 27 1 . 5 1 0 . 0 8 47 0 . 0 7 7 . 4 2 14 4 . 1 5
16 .99 4 1 5 . 6 7 2 . 8 1 25 0 . 7 0
11 .39 9 5 . 9 3 16 .49 6 9 8 . 8 7 1 4 . 9 1 8 7 . 1 2 3 . 8 2 21 2 . 8 3 0 . 3 3 45 0 . 2 7
16 .84 5 11 .98 0 . 9 5 38 0 . 0 0 1 . 4 0 35 1 . 3 9 3 . 5 3 22 0 . 9 1 2 . 8 1 25 8 . 3 7 6 . 2 2 16 5 . 1 0 0 . 6 1 39 0 . 7 1 1 . 4 3 33 1 . 4 0 4. 2 0 33 1 .34 28
4 6 . 0 8 9 21 1 . 7 3 45 37 9 . 2 0 4 25 2 . 6 1 18 23 2 . 1 2 23 16 0 . 0 0 3b 6 9 . 5 0 3
15 3 . 7 6 14 35 4 . 7 9 12 31 1 . 3 7 27
5 15 .20 1 26 4.U& 13 12 1 .07 31 19 3 . 3 6 16 22 2 . 2 3 2 1 29 5 . 0 6 11 20 2 . 5 3 19 41 3 . 4 5 15 26 2 . 1 9 22 47 1 . 0 0 S2 27 1 . 3 1 29 36 3 . 2 9 17 36 0 . 2 5 4 * 44 0 . 4 3 35 17 0 . 9 7 33 43 0 . 6 0 34 10 6 . 2 2 b 24 1 . 9 3 2 4 8 11 .48 2
32 l . *8 26 6 . 6 7 7 . 7 7 7 2 . 2 0 4 . 7 9
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
-
DATA FOR THE OFFICfcS LISTED ON THIS PAbfc FOR THE STATEMENT WEEK BEGINNING 7 9 / 0 1 / 0 4 ARE EITHER MISSING Oft INCORRECT, THE STATISTICS AND RANKINGS ON THE ACCOMPANYING REPORTS ARE AFFECTED ACCORDINGLY.
020 NEW YORK
021 BUFFALO
022 JERICHO
023 CRANFORD
024 UTICA
040 CLEVELAND
041 CINCINNATI
042 PITTSBURGH
043 COLUMBUS
051 BALTIMORE
065 MIAMI
NOTE: A CHECK HAS BEEN MADE ONLY UN KEY DATA FIELDS WHICH WOULD AFFECT THE ACCOMPANYING RANKINGS FOR THE LATEST REPORTED MEEK SHOWN. FLOAT ANALYSTS SHOULD REVIEW PREVIOUS EDIT REPORTS FOR WARNING MESSAGES AND ACCURACY OF REPORTED FIGURES.
Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
