K101-QC-PL.001_Quality Plan_Rev 0.pdf

8/18/2019 K101-QC-PL.001_Quality Plan_Rev 0.pdf

1/85


2/85

QUALITY PLAN

Code: K101-QC-PL.001

Version: 0

DETAIL EXCAVATION AND U/G UTILITY WORKS Page : 2 de 21

INDEXMISION

VISION

INTRODUCTION

1.0. OBJECTIVE AND APLICATION

1.1. Objective

1.2. Application

2.0. NORMATIVE REFERENCE AND OTHERS

3.0. DEFINITIONS AND TERMS

3.1. Definitions

3.2. Terms

4.0. QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (QMS) FOR THE PROJECT

4.1. General Requirements

4.2. Document control

4.3. Inspection and Testing plans

4.4. Record Control

5.0. FUNCTIONSAND RESPONSABILITIES

5.1. Project Management Commitment

5.2. Customers Approach – Coordination with Fluor Canada Ltd.

5.3. Quality Policy

5.4. Quality Management System Plan

5.5. Responsibility, Authority and Communication

5.6. Direction Review

6.0. RESOURCES MANAGEMENT

6.1. Material Resources6.2. Human Resources

6.3. Infrastructure

6.4. Working Environment

7.0. PRODUCT REALIZATION

7.1. Product Realization Planning

7.2. Processes related to the Client


3/85

QUALITY PLAN


Version: 0


7.3. Design y Development

7.4. Purchases

7.5. Production y Service Provision

7.6. Monitoring and Measurement Equipment Control

8.0. ANALYSIS MEASUREMENT AND IMPROVEMENT

8.1. Monitoring and Measurement

8.2. Product Non Conformance Control

8.3. Data Analysis

8.4. Improvement

9.0. ANNEXES

K101-QC-PL-PR-001 Non Conformance Process

K101-QC-PL-PR-002 Internal Quality Audits

K101-QC-PL-PR-003 Inspection and Testing Plan

K101-QC-PL-PR-004 Acquaintance of Quality Plan Instructive

K101-QC-PL-PR-005 Quality Control Forms

K101-QC-PL-PR-006 Measurement equipment control and testing procedure

K101-QC-PL-PR-007 Personnel Training Program

K101-QC-PL-PR-008 Subcontractor Qualification

K101-QC-PL-PR-009 Reception of Material

K101-QC-PL-PR-010 Storage of Material and Equipment


4/85

QUALITY PLAN


Version: 0


MISION

Provide specialized industrial services, with excellence in safety, quality and productivity being part

of the sustainable development of our society.

VISION

Be the leading firm in industrial construction and assembling in Peru.

INTRODUCTION

MOTA-ENGIL PERU S.A. as part of a policy to satisfy the Customer has developed this Quality

Management Plan through strict compliance with the specifications and requirements of the project,

based on the guidelines of ISO 9001-2008.

The Quality Plan to be used in the Project will be checked by the Project Manager and approved by

Fluor Canada Ltd. before the application. Writing, control, emission, and filing of the present Quality

Plan will be responsibility of the project manager who will be in charge of announcing it at the

project directory (Document Control) and will distribute thereafter following a chart created and

adapted for the purpose of the work. The person responsible for the project will provide all the

resources for the application. Quality Chief of the work is in charge of updating, revision, control

and implementation of QP at work, as well as the Inspection and testing management plans,

instructions, forms and other quality documents required.

1. OBJECTIVE AND APLICATION

1.1. OBJECTIVEThe Quality Plan (QP) to be used in the Project will be checked by the project manager (PM)

and approved by Fluor Canada Ltd. before the application. Writing, control, emission, and

filing of the present Quality Plan will be responsibility of the project manager (PM) who will

be in charge of announcing it at the project directory (Document Control) and will distribute

thereafter following a chart created and adapted for the purpose of the work. The person

responsible for the project will provide all the resources for the application. Quality Chief of

the work is in charge of updating, revision, control and implementation of QP at work, as well

as the Inspection and testing management plans, instructions, forms and other quality

documents required.

1.2. APLICATION

The present Quality Plan has as objective to define a way to implement and perform the

Quality Management System (QMS), in the work, and is applied for:

Project: DETAIL EXCAVATION AND U/G UTILITY WORKS Contract: A6CV-00-K101

Client / Supervision: Fluor Canada Ltd.

Engineering: Fluor Canada- GMI

Contractor: Mota-Engil Peru


5/85

QUALITY PLAN


Version: 0


1.2.1 Scopes:

• CIVIL WORKS Pipeline earthwork

Localized Excavation for pipeline anchoring.

Reinforced concrete Pipeline

Building ties and pipeline anchoring.

• STRUCTURAL STEEL

- Multi-plate tunnels Installation.

• MECHANIC WORK AND PIPELINES

- Carbon Steel pipeline assembly, diameter equal to 4”, 6”, 8”, 10”, 12”, 24” y 36”.

- HDPE pipeline assembly, diameter equal to 2”, 3”, 4”, 6”, 8”, 10”, 12”, 14”, 16”, 18”,

20”,24”, 30”, 42”, 48” y 63”.

- PVC pipe installation with diameter equal to 4”, 6”, 8”, 10 y 12”.

- Assembly of 3 waste water tanks

2. NORMATIVE REFERENCE AND OTHERS

Quality Management System – Requirements ISO 9001:2008

- Fluor Quality Manual

- MEP Quality Management System (internal procedures).

- Drawings, Specifications and Documents in accordance with the Annexes given by the

client

ASTM : American Society for Testing and Materials

ACI : American Concrete Institute

ANSI : American National Standards Institute.

ASME : American Society of Mechanical Engineers

AWS : American Welding Society

MSS : Manufactures Standardization Society of Valve and Fittings

Industry

PFI : Pipe Fabrication Institute

ISO 9001: 2000 - Quality management systems – Requirements ISO10005: 1995- Guidelines for quality plans

3. DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS 3.1. DEFINITIONS

Definitions in accordance with ISO 9000. The following definition is also used:

ITP (Inspection and testing plan): Document which establishes the necessary information to

carry out the Control of each activity which conform it, through a record of the inspections,

trials and tests required for the procedures, specifications and contractual requirements

established by the client.


6/85

QUALITY PLAN


Version: 0


RMA (Register Matrix): Document created to establish the quantity of records to be issued

during the project in accordance with ITP, project lots and forms which must be sent.

3.2 ABBREVIATIONS

The following abbreviations will be used in this Quality Plan:

• SGC : Quality Management Plan (Sistema de Gestión de Calidad)• GP : Project Manager (Gerente de Proyecto)• OCO: Quality of work Office (Oficina de Calidad de Obra)• OTO: Work technical Office (Oficina Técnica de Obra)• JOC: Quality Office Manager (Jefe de Oficina de Calidad)• JOT: Technical Office Manager (Jefe de Oficina Técnica)• JCO: Construction Manager (Jefe de Construcción de Obra)• ADO: Project Construction Manager (Administrador de Obra)• GGE: Company’s General Manager (Gerente General de empresa)

4. QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (QMS) FOR THE PROJECT

4.1. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

This Quality plan has been implemented to ensure the Quality Management System (QMS)

and Fluor Canada Ltd. quality requirements are implemented in every Construction Process(Fig. 1).

CONTROL MANAGEMENT AND QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCESS DIAGRAM

Figure 1

Fig. 1 Subcontracted processes (NDT, Technical tests) will be supervised and audited


7/85

QUALITY PLAN


Version: 0


PROJECT QMS: has the following process:

- QUALITY PROYECT PLAN (Planning): Quality Plan and its annexes(Quality Policy; Project Quality Objectives; contract, legislation, codes, rules and

specifications of application; ITP; Register Matrix; Procedures, Forms)

- Quality control of construction (Make): Inspection and testing activities, quality plan forsubcontractors, calibration control of measurement equipment, and testing, material at

work site control, testing and document control.

- Construction Quality Assurance (Review and Perform): Internal Auditory, Non-conformances, corrective and preventing measures .Client satisfaction.

4.2. DOCUMENTARY CONTROL

OTO, through the work Document Control (DC); controls and distributes all the Project

documentation which contains data and information which could affect the quality of thecontracted works (contract, administrative foundations, specifications, drawings,

manufacturer’s catalogues, proposal study). Drawings and technical specifications of the

Licitation base are part of the Document Control.

Control System of Document; will be as follows:

1. Reception of MEP through DC, documentary correspondence (technical and of quality)

sent by the client/subcontractor/MEP with transmittal, reproducible and prints.

2. Download of documentation, documents Access through transmittal number.

3. DC prints the document and redirects the document to the Construction chief (work) for

checking and indications for proper delivery.

4. Distribution to supervision, planning, technical office, topography and copy for filling;

reproducible and print, as indication of Construction Manager.

5. Include documents in a list for enquiry of every work department (updated version).

MOBILIZATION PROCESS DIAGRAM OF DOCUMENTS

FIG.2


8/85

QUALITY PLAN


Version: 0


Approved and updated documents should be at hand in the place where major operations

are realized for the proper functioning or our contract and where the plan requires it

(technical office. Quality Office, Construction Office, Specialist Managers)

MEP will act at field a copy of every plan of the project, original size; exclusively to have a

control of modifications realized (Red Line). With these drawings MEP will prepare As-built

drawings print and virtual version (last current version in Arequipa) to be submitted to FluorCanada Ltd for checking and approval.

All outdated documents will be DISALLOWED and retired by OTO, to avoid a wrong use.

OCO will perform regular documented and recorded audits and to assure the use of

specifications, drawings, procedures, instructions and other updated quality documents for

revision. OCO controls and distributes to involved sections and according its activity; Quality

Plan documentation (Procedures, Instructions, ITP, Forms, Policies and Quality Objectives)

as set forth in the Procedures General List of SGC and MEP policies MEP has adocumented procedure for this with the purpose to assure emission control, updating and

distribution.

If the Client imposes its own Document Manager. It will be used if not a MEP Document

Manager could be used.

4.3. INSPECTION AND TESTING PLANS

OCO will issue Fluor Canada Ltd. Tentative ITP for approval in order to those tests whichare considered critical to be periodically coordinated with Fluor Canada Ltd. to be present atthese and validate the execution with them.

4.4. RECORD CONTROL

MEP has established, according to the activity, the use of forms for Quality control (records,protocols, checking lists, etc.) in order to have an objective evidence of the production works

performed by the work employees.

Submitted forms of MEP will be used In the present project. In the absence of a proper form

for the control of a certain activity, OCO MEP will provide the one required, prior approval of

Fluor Canada Ltd.

Records are permanently created and realized, by the construction and MEP assembly for

approval and validity of Fluor Canada Ltd. Filling involves making notes in neat formsneither modifications nor smudging.

Any alteration or failure (wrong filling) generates the invalidation of such document. Controls

will be previously scheduled and coordinated with Fluor Canada Ltd, giving notice andasking for its authorization

Record management including your file is in charge of OCO MEP, which supports in the

verification or checking process and verification before MEP.

Testing or trial records carried out by third parties will be submitted by them and their control

and filing are responsibility of OCO MEP.


9/85

QUALITY PLAN


Version: 0


Original records, with full signatures, will be filed in accordance with previously agreed

processes with the client (systems, subsystems or areas). At the end of each process, they

will be given directly to QA Fluor Canada Ltd in the respective Dossier, at the end of everystage of the process.

5. FUNCTIONS AND RESPONSABILITIES

5.1. PROJECT MANAGEMENT COMMITMENT

It is the Project manager’s commitment, representing MEP, the implementation of SCG of

MEP conveying in every project organization the importance of satisfying the established

requirements of Fluor as well as legislative and regulatory ones; and both MEP Quality

Policy and Quality Objectives which from time to time are reviewed through Quality Rates for

measuring compliance, Project Manager in line with his commitment and SGC

implementation development of MEP and the agreed with Fluor Canada Ltd sets up:

- Weekly meetings with his work force to assure the resources availability, checking

compliance with the scope of work program.

- Recorded monthly meetings to carry out advance revisions and compliance of scopes,

ensure providing during the project of MEP Quality Policy (5.3.) and the compliance of

goals identified (5.4.).

5.2. CUSTOMER APPROACH - COORDINATIONS WITH FLUOR CANADA LTD.

MEP will perform the project coordinating with Fluor Canada Ltd permanently throughmeetings in the agreed and conveyed place.

These meetings(will be attended by the Project manager, Chief of work, Work responsible,

HSE manager and Quality Manager) will be carried out at Fluor Canada Ltd. Facilities andthese will lead to understand the project results through Fluor Canada Ltd. and at the sametime as feedback and also improve the development of the project processes and products.

These meetings which be taken into account for MEP Internal Audits let to consolidate and

measure MEP Quality System.

5.3. QUALITY POLICY

In line with the Quality Policy and de Quality objectives established by the general

Management, Project Manager is responsible on site for them to be diffused, understood and

kept, through internal channels.

5.4. QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLANNING

In line with MEP Quality objectives, GP has established for this Project the next Quality

Rates to be monthly measured and checked.

- Quality chats: once a month - Welded joints repairing: 5% maximum- Welded joints performance: XX”/ Hh welder


10/85

QUALITY PLAN


Version: 0


These rates are reported monthly in the Monthly Quality Report prepared by JOC and

presented to GP.

SGC on site is planned through the preparation of the present Quality Plan. Procedures,

instructions forms for registers and verification lists, PIE, construction processes,

implementation Schedule as well as resources and all the management elements specified

herein.

Quality Chief is responsible for management and updating the Quality Plan (QP), issuing the

PC Implementation Program, which allows planning and control the application and

compliance of PC on site.

5.5. RESPONSIBILITY, AUTHORITY AND COMMUNICATION

5.5.1 Responsibility and Authority

Hierarchical and Functional line of command for this project is defined in the nominal project

organizational structure approved by the senior executives.

The office organizational structure is defined in accordance with Fig. 3

ORGANIZATION OF QA / QC PROJECT K101Figure 3

The functions and responsibilities of every MEP worker (direction and supervision staff) aredefined in the profiles included in your manual of organization and functions MEP-MF-RRHH. The codes of profiles of project direction are mentioned:

a. Project Manager(PM)

Responsible for the compliance of plans and defined programs, providing the completion of

work as part of the plans under the contract and required quality.

PROJECT

MANAGER

QA/QC CIVIL

SUPERVISOR

QA/QC CIVIL

SUPERVISOR

QA/QC PIPING

SUPERVISOR

LABORATORY

TECHNICIAN

LABORATORY

TECHNICIAN

QUALITY

CHIEF

QUALITY CONTROL

ASSISTANT


11/85

QUALITY PLAN


Version: 0


- Perform the works taking into account the current budget of project.

- Assure the compliance of plans and defined programs, providing the completion of the

work according to the arrangements fixed.

- Nominate and management of necessary resources (equipment, material and manpower

qualified) to fulfill with the scopes and specified contractual requirements, and the present

PC, in order to obtain the client’s satisfaction.

- Responsible for the implantation of the present PC on site providing the quality of the

works performed, defining the preventive form the corrective and preventive measures

and checking the results obtained.

- Coordinate with the client the requirements previously to avoid non-Conformances and

guiding during the execution of the non-commissioner and commissioner, providing the

resources and demands required.

b. Eng. Chief Construction (CHC)

Responsible for the constructive processes of the work in accordance with the rule of the

rules, procedures and other contractual quality requirements established.

Prepare and present prior to commencing constructive Process of the work, procedures

which require to be used in the Construction and other required events for approval of

Fluor Canada Ltd. Coordinate and carry out the removal of Non-conformances and other remarks presented

during the project.

Coordinate modifications and engineering inquiries through OTO/MEP. Verify the management of documents, drawings and other technical specifications,

updated and approved for construction, remove all outdated data which could cause

confusion and therefore affect the quality of the processes and products of the work.

Have a control of the modifications performed in the drawings (Red Lines) and dependingon the progress of the work, submit them to OTO for footage control. Perform work taking into account the safety of workers as well as facilities, equipment

and machinery.

c. Technical Office Manager (TOM)

Responsible for the management and distribution of applicable construction documents

(Drawings, technical specifications, procedures, other), monitoring the progress of the

project and providing the construction technically.

d. Construction Manager (CM)

Responsible for the personal management and warehouse on site including supervision

at the work site, coordinating with the client entrance proceedings and submittal of

identification cards.

Supports the performance of the contract. MEP warehouse areas on work site , personneland local assistant are beneath his responsibility

Personnel area will be in charge of calculation and payments of benefits, calculation and

social payments, recruitment of personnel and obtain all necessary documents for the

access to the sites of Minera Cerro Verde. Construction Manager will be also in charge of


12/85

QUALITY PLAN


Version: 0


coordinating with the client the use of entrance proceedings and submittal of identification

cards.

Social assistant will assist the personnel to solve any demand or conflict of MEP workers

as assigned to project.

Warehouse responsible will be in charge of management of tool and consumable

warehouses supplied by MEP and monitoring of project work site related to MEP.

e. Quality Office Manager (QOM)

Responsible for PC Implementation and Management, assuring the quality of the project

and presentation of Quality Dossiers to Fluor Canada Ltd.; and reporting the ProjectManager monthly with a copy for the Corporate Quality Chief.

Depends hierarchically of GP and functionally of Quality Management Chief of MEP.

Coordinate the quality aspects related to the project before Fluor Canada Ltd.

Manage the quality control of the work through the elaboration of ITP’s coordinating with

PCM and TOM, and Registers Matrix.

Responsible for PC Implementation and maintenance or registers and quality procedures

on site.

Identify opening and keeping control of Internal Non Conformance reports (NCR) of work,

realizing monitoring and management for the adjournment and closure of NCR.

Elaborate and present Fluor Canada Ltd. dossiers of the project to according to theprogress of the work.

Supports PM and for the implementation of the Quality plan, conveying policy and

objectives of quality of MEP-K101, monitoring through documented internal Audits, andestablishment in all MEP-K101areas and its contractors.

Verify through internal documented Audits, all the outdated documents, drawings andconstructive processes have been removed and using the last version of the project

“approved for construction”

It has the necessary functions autonomy to stop the work, rejecting a work, remove a

work order; refusing the materials which do not fulfill with the specifications of the project.

Quality staff will not get involved in management and construction process control.

Be completely familiarized with the approaches of contract works, drawings and

specifications.

Submit monthly reports with a summary of OCO activities to the PM with copy for the

MEP Corporate Quality Manager; according to “ QC Monthly report ON SITE”

Verify and monitoring updated Control of the Inspection equipment, measurement and

testing and its respective certifications.

5.5.2 Direction Representative in the Quality Area

In the current project the PM is designed as MEP representative. The QMO dependsfunctionally on MEP-K101 Quality Manager who at the same time has been designed byGGE as its representative in order to on its behalf and independently of otherresponsibilities, has the authority to assure, apply and maintain the QMS of MEP in theproject.


13/85

QUALITY PLAN


Version: 0


5.5.3. Communication

MEP-K101 schedules the execution of meetings as a means to unification, analysis andsolution consensus. The meetings are oriented to:

Internal MeetingsProject Manager of MEP-K101 will establish regular recorded meetings of internalcoordination (once a week) related to disciplines of the project (civil, mechanical, electrical,

and others) and the support areas if required; with the purpose of talking about aspects

related to the monitoring the control and quality of product assurance.

Different actions related to the quality among the different subcontractors will additionally be

coordinated

MEP-K101 uses the next internal communication channels: E-mails

Informative presentations

Training booklets

Pamphlets and/or index cards on work site

Meetings with subcontractors:MEP-K101 will establish regular recorded meetings, with the main subcontractors. Aspectsrelated to control and quality assurance on the subcontractor’s side will be spoken (quality

rates, ups and downs in the welders, Non Conformances statistics, usual value in the results

of trials, implementation of corrective actions, etc.)

Revision by Direction: performed as set forth in 5.6

5.6. Revision by Direction

5.6.1 Entrance information and Revision Results

At the completion of the work, the PM evaluates the effectiveness and adequacy of QMS to

satisfy the requirements of ISO 9001 to accomplish the policy and MEP quality objectives.The necessity to make changes and create opportunities is identified for a continuous

improvement.

The evaluations include at least aspects such as:

• Achievement of quality objectives in the work.

• Results of internal auditors performed.

• Relevant Non conformances.• Complaints made by the client (Fluor Canada Ltd).

• Corrective and preventive Actions pursued.

• Development of subcontractors hired.

QMO keeps the register of such evaluation. This takes part of the entrance information to be

checked by GGE. It will be generated before the demobilization of QMO or a month later of

the end of the work.


14/85

QUALITY PLAN


Version: 0


6. RESOURCES MANAGEMENT

6.1. MATERIAL RESOURCES

Project Manager is responsible to supply the material and human resources for the

procurement of the project objectives. He will decide the scope, No of resources, lasting time

for the assignation of them in the work with the purpose to ensure the objectives of the

project are reached. Internal Reference: Recruitment and Staff Selection

6.2. HUMAN RESOURCES

MEP will provide staff highly trained according to their specialties, with staff in supervision,direction and performance with wide experience.

6.2.1 Training and recruitment

Carried out according to the functions of MEP staff will perform in the project.

Training in technical subjects and QMS needed to improve our quality of service

Training panels on technical subjects and QMS needed to improve our quality service

delivery of training booklets.

Document evaluations and qualifications of the supervision staff, direction and

performance of the work (affect quality) and the quality office which monitors and supplies

QMS

We assure all the staff understands clearly the influence that the deficient

accomplishment of a work has over other workers, clients and the success of the

organization as a group. Internal Reference: Training Record

6.3. INFRASTRUCTURE

MEP keeps for the staff, proper facilities on work site (offices, workshops, warehouses andservices), computing equipment (equipment and nets) and the software needed to develop

properly the contract, with antivirus and support of the relevant documentation of MEP.

MEP is responsible for the of its work zones, performing operations in order to reduce risksprovoked by thefts, damages, vandalism, sabotages and other conditions to a minimum.

In communication, MEP takes into account the use of telephones, mobiles, radio equipmentand system for the staff as needed.

Accommodations and feeding for the staff during their stay in the project will be supplied by

MEP.

6.4. WORKING ENVIRONMENT

MEP provides personal protection equipment required in the work and will implementInducting talks which will include minimum guidelines needed to be performed in safe

conditions in the working environment.

MEP records the attendance to such talks and delivery of personal protection equipment.


15/85

QUALITY PLAN


Version: 0


MEP including the staff, suppliers and subcontractors will use only the access roadsdesigned by Fluor Canada Ltd. for being used. Every safety helmet and vehicles will haveMEP’s logo printed.

7. PRODUCT REALIZATIÓN

7.1. PRODUCT REALIZATION PLANNING

Considering:

Delivery of the Quality documentation (Quality Plan, Procedures, Instructions and Forms)

to the principal office of the work.

Authorization to work (separated codified) for the new generation of recorded procedures

and instructions when their absence affects negatively the quality.

Coordination with the client for approval of quality plan of rev.A (negotiation) to rev0(performance), after the identification of activities which require monitoring and control as

part of a continuous program of quality control of each one of the processes.

OCO of MEP will submit to Fluor Canada Ltd. for approval the ITP of the constructionprocesses in order to those inspections and tests considered critical are permanently

coordinated with Fluor Canada Ltd., are present in them and validate their performance. Elaborate RMA for future registers advance control.

Monitoring activities and processes control and accomplishment of procedures,

instructions and specifications of the contract.

Approval of works recorded through the protocols and corresponding registers.

The identification of activities which require monitoring and control to continue the

performance of the process, in the inspection plans and testings of this plan.

Verification of non conformances in engineering such us interferences, lack of information

and construction and assembly difficulties.

Identification of especial and critical constructive aspects of activities like welding and

concreting; their monitoring and variable control.

7.2. PROCESSES RELATED TO THE CLIENT

7.2.1 Communication con el Client

The communication with Fluor Canada Ltd. will be through meetings, letters, mails and POLsystems (Fluor Canada Ltd.). Project Manager of MEP or the person he nominates, checks,approves and conveys the modifications asked directly by the client, to the functions and

involved units in the work.

Registers of the agreements and authorizations of the client are kept to make changes or

modifications to the contract or technical specifications of the project.

7.3. DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT

Created by Fluor Canada Ltd.


16/85

QUALITY PLAN


Version: 0


7.4. PURCHASES: MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT INCORPORATED TO THE WORK.

On MEP’s side: everything detailed in the document furnished by the client "Scope of Work -Section 2 – MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT FURNISHED BY COMPANY AND

CONTRACTOR will be respected.

On the client’s side (FLUOR): 36”Ø Carbon steel pipelines

36”,12”, 8” HDPE pipelines

Valves of all types and dimensions

Transformers

Environment and all the material for the implementation and connection in the Electric

room.

Pump assembly

Every type of material involved directly to the project MEP shall verify the quality

certificates and shall be subject of approval by FLUOR Canada Ltd.

7.5. PRODUCTION Y SERVICE PROVISION

7.5.1 Production Control and Service Provision

Objectionable Work Reprocessing and re-inspections and job tests will be performed by

MEP without any additional cost, except where the work was performed according to thecontract.

Inspection or lack of inspection by Fluor Canada Ltd. shall not be considered as renouncingof any of their rights to the insurance of the contract or any right to reject Non conformances.

For Control Production, registers are made (protocols and checklists), inspections and

testings as objective evidence of the proper performance of activities.

Final release and delivering of work: As the construction proceeds, MEP will take notes inRed (Red Line), of every change in the development of the work, which will be submitted

immediately.

Additionally MEP shall file the replacement documents which approve the designmodifications and then present OTO, the final deliverables “As-Built” in Fluor Canada Ltd standard form and also adjoining the Red Line ones (notes in red) as form of support.

Releasing process and delivery will be realized by systems or as defined by the client. The

documentary acceptance will realize through the delivery of the project dossier to QA from

FLUOR Canada Ltd who checks and approves.

Work Quality of MEP plans to organize the dossier as established with Fluor Canada Ltd.including:

Inspection and Testing plans of every discipline ( ITP’s).

Original Registers of the Inspections performed (civil, mechanical, electrical and

Instrumentation), properly signed by the supervisor of Fluor Canada Ltd. Original Registers of testing performed in situ or laboratory.

Calibration of instruments certificates.


17/85

QUALITY PLAN


Version: 0


Certificates of welders qualification and Welding Processes

Dossiers will be submitted to FLUOR the original and scanned, with the form No “Letter ofAcceptance” to be singed as a form of approval.

An additional scanned copy will take part of the Files of MEP Quality Control.

7.5.2 .Validation of Processes and provision of services

MEP does not validate the process developed by the present project due to is engineeringdeveloped by the client. MEP will support with personnel and tools for the tests ofcommissioning support.

7.5.3 Identification and Traceability of the Product

The identification of the product incorporated to the construction and performance

processes, as the mechanic e, electric and instrumentation equipment, other as anchor

bolts, piping and welding fixtures are established in a process of material traceability.

Traceability at the same time is applied to the activities of welded joints (pipes and boiler)

and laying of structural concrete and also elements for the process of construction through

the marks clearly pointed on the surface of the elements to control.

Reference: Identification and Traceability of the Installation Parts

7.5.4 Client Property

Verification mechanisms for identification, reception and load of supplies from Fluor Canada

Ltd. added to the construction or assembling processes, are considered in a writing process.This verification may be realized in the presence of Fluor Canada Ltd, its representative, orwho has transported the product if applicable. This activity does not exempt Fluor CanadaLtd. to deliver the acceptable supply.

Any abnormal situation detected during the reception control shall be immediately reported

to the Construction Manager and Quality Office MEP.

Where corresponds, the reception of products or services given by Fluor Canada Ltd maybe indicated in the Inspection and Testing Plans.

In the event of detecting information, none conform (lost, damaged or unsuitable for its use)

product or service (engineering, supplies, facilities or works), shall be recorded and reportedimmediately by MEP to Fluor Canada Ltd. In the agreed place for damaged material, theywill be pointed with an inscription which shows its disuse.

Such materials shall be retired according and through approved form and documentation

and also a previously coordinated schedule with FLUOR’S. The handling and storage ofsupply furnished by FLUOR is performed according to the mechanisms of 7.4.5 herein.


18/85

QUALITY PLAN


Version: 0


7.5.5. Product Conservation

Once FLUOR furnishes the equipments, materials and related; those are beneathresponsibility of MEP so that the responsible of warehouses (when is in storage) work

manager (when assembling) and will have to take measurements to avoid damage in

general and therefore foreseen Non-conformances until the final reception on the side of

FLUOR in any case MEP responsible people.

MEP considers a Procedure for reception, storage, handling and preservation of its suppliesand the client’s in the warehouses or patios which the work requires.

If the work requirements allow this, specific instructions are created for special conditions of

handling, preservation and storage of equipment and particular supplies. Non conform

supplies are identified as defines in 8.2 while remaining in the storage areas mentioned

above.

Reference:

K101-QC-PL-PR-009 Material Receiving Procedure

K101-QC-PL-PR-010 Material & Equipment Storage Procedure

7.6. CONTROL OF “MONITORING AND MEASUREMENT EQUIPMENT”

The equipment for inspection, measurement and testing to be used in the work should have

current calibration certificates in order to assure the values to measure are exact and the

technical specification of the project are accomplished. The next date for calibration and

comparison should be planned and is established the period of validity of one year after

which the equipments shall be sent for revision and calibration to renew another period of

validity.

The inspection and testing is also extended to products received. It must not be used a

product/batch or allow them leave until they have not overcome the respective inspection

stages and pertinent tests (this will be reflected in the respective records). Products which do

not overcome the inspection and testing stages are “Non conform” and an appropriate

process for these kind of products will be applied (Non-conform product process).

Reference: K101-QC-PL-PR-001

8. ANALYSIS MEASUREMENT AND IMPROVEMENT

8.1. MONITORING AND MEASUREMENT

To know the appropriate development of the processes and degree of the client’s

satisfaction, information is from time to time compiled and analyzed from the next sources:

8.1.1. Client’s Satisfaction

The client’s satisfaction is the final objective in every service given by MEP. It will evaluateand analyze formally, according to the established in reference to the client complaints, is

duty of any receptor redirect the original to the Construction Manager and Project Manager

(PM). He is the one who, prior verification, notifies the involved areas about its existence


19/85

QUALITY PLAN


Version: 0


describing it and pointing out its immediate processing, conveying the GP and the Quality

Management Area of MEP.

Afterwards, the GP of MEP with the Construction Manager evaluates the complaint to decideits definitive processing and reply the client in writing.

The Construction Manager of MEP, in the light of the complaints will be able to take

corrective actions where applicable, requiring the participation of other area responsible

involved in this.

The manager of the Quality of Work Office of MEP (OCO) will file a copy of every complaintas well as the corrective actions taken and the result of such corrective actions, for the

revision of the Quality System by the Direction, notifying the GP such result and this at the

same time to the Construction Manager who will answer in writing to the client pointing out

the application and result of the Corrective Action.

To improve the service given to the client, OCO compiles:

• Complaints of the client (letters, meeting notes, NCR, work control book)

• Refusal of payoff statement

• Acts of Measurement of the client’s satisfaction.

Reference: Evaluation of the Client’s Satisfaction

8.1.2. Satisfaction of Product

The registers of every inspection and testing performed (protocols, checklists, certificates,

reports, etc.) are kept. They can be considered as internal resources or external organisms

evaluated to perform any of the testing indicated in the technical specifications of the project.

All the register of the Quality plan issued by land and signed by the people responsible

indicated in those, it is considered as conform (approved).

Internal Reference: K101-QC-PL-PR-003 Inspection and Testing.

8.1.3. Internal Audits

With the objective to assure the Quality on site accomplishes the requirements of ISO

9001:2008 and the Quality Plan on work site, MEP realizes internal audits about quality on

work site performed according to Internal Audits Annual Plan approved by MEP Quality

Committee where the Work Audits are included according to K101-QC-PL-PR-002;

considering extraordinary those which are not included in such plan.

These ones are performed by qualified Internal Auditor sand independent of the activities

and audited areas and documented in a Report of Audits. The next points will be evaluated:

Verify the accomplishment of every aspect of the Quality Plan.

MEP’s ITP and the subcontractors ones are monitored and have the corresponding

quality registers

Verify the degree of implementation and effectiveness of the Quality Plan.

Non Conformances (NC) are complemented.


20/85

QUALITY PLAN


Version: 0


Verify the implementation of corrective actions and record the effectiveness.

Verify if the activities and quality results of the work accomplish the provisions planned.

The Chief Auditor is responsible for:

Summon the audits, notifying about the agenda in advance.

Issue the Auditory Report, as well as its distribution.

Perform the monitoring for the solution of the detected Non Conformances in the closure

dates foreseen.

Internal Reference: K101-QC-PL-PR-002 Internal Quality Audits.

8.2. Non Conformance Product Control (NC)

Procedure K101-QC-PL-PR-001, to identify and management of deviations according to

what was specified in the contract or in the procedures and instructions applied in the area to

perform the project, including MEP deliverables and those of the client will be applied unlessotherwise the contract determines the opposite in order to these are documented, examined

and solved through Non Conformance Reports (NCR).

The process to manage an internal NC is:

Originated for any employee of Mota-Engil Peru who describes what was detected The opening for a NC is performed by the manager of the Quality of Work Office (QWO)

Who will code, record and perform its monitoring. He will sent the NC to the involved area

and convey the people involved. (Project Manager, Construction Manager).

Analyze the Non Conformance cause by the Direction, and involved personnel and

determination of the action to correct the non-conformance.

Correction performed by the responsible of the involved area as soon as possible.

Verify the right corrective action and closure of the NC by QOM. NCR must be conveyed to Fluor Canada Ltd. regarding the External Non Conformance

handling, these are originated for the supervision of work Fluor Canada Ltd.: It is MEP responsibility to close the Non Conformances according to the procedures

previously established in accordance with Fluor Canada Ltd. Perform the removal of NCR, asking for its closure through a letter addressed to Fluor

Canada Ltd engineering for approval.

If required, the procedure could be carried out by the seller, manufacturer or specialist.

Internal Reference: K101-QC-PL-PR-001 Non Conformance Process

8.3. DATA ANALYSIS

The main sources of information established to monitor and analyze the quality system are:

registers which release and compile from the information in item 8.1 of this plan.

These data let to evaluate where the continuous improvements can be created in such

system. Paying special attention to the information concerning to the client’s satisfaction,

defined processes, suppliers, and conformity of product requirements.


21/85

QUALITY PLAN


Version: 0


8.4. IMPROVEMENT

8.4.1. Continuous Improvement

The implementation of continuous Improvement through the analysis of controlled results by

means of indicators, taken from:

NCR issued internally and supervised by Fluor Canada Ltd. Monthly reports of the work: non quality costs produced

Internal Audits Reports

Corrective Actions Monitoring

8.4.2. PREVENTIVE AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS

To prevent possible deviations of the Quality System implemented or when any NRC is

produced in a Corrective Actions Reports will be emitted according to the next NCR →

HANDLING/REPAIR → ANALYSIS CAUSES → CA (Corrective Action) CA (Corrective

Action) oriented to establish measures which let avoiding potential causes of NCR.

The aim of this activity is to detect, analyze and eliminate potential causes of NCR.

CA is planned, registered, performed with allocation of responsibilities according to their

nature of the NC performed.

Corrective and preventive Actions are:

- Record and identification of Non Conformances associated

- Studying of causes

- Decision to implement them and assignate resources and terms

- Perform and control concrete actions

- Verify the effectiveness of the action implemented

Client’s complaints related to Non Conformances of Mota-Engil Peru responsibilities to

create corrective actions.

Internal Reference: K101-QC-PL-PR-001 Non Conformance Process

9. ANNEXES

- ANEXO 1: K101-QC-PL-PR-001 Non Conformance Process

- ANEXO 2: K101-QC-PL-PR-002 Internal Quality Audits

- ANEXO 3: K101-QC-PL-PR-003 Inspection and Testing Plan

- ANEXO 4: K101-QC-PL-PR-004 Acquaintance of Quality Plan Instructive

- ANEXO 5: K101-QC-PL-PR-005 Quality Control Forms

- ANEXO 6: K101-QC-PL-PR-006 Measurement equipment control and testing procedure

- ANEXO 7: K101-QC-PL-PR-007 Personnel Training Program

- ANEXO 8: K101-QC-PL-PR-008 Subcontractor Qualification

- ANEXO 9: K101-QC-PL-PR-009 Reception of Material

- ANEXO 10: K101-QC-PL-PR-010 Storage of Material and Equipment


22/85

PROCEDUREK101-QC-PL-PR-001

NON-CONFORMANCE PROCESS

Version : 0

Page : 1 - 11

Annex 1

ASSURANCE MANAGEMENT AND QUALITY CONTROL

PROCEDURE: NON-CONFORMANCE PROCESS

CODE: K101-QC-PL-PR-001


23/85



Version : 0

Page : 2 - 11

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. OBJECT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 3

2. SCOPE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 3

3. RESPONSABILITIES ------------------------------------------------------------------- 3

4. DEFINITIONS ------------------------------------------------------------------- 3

4.1. NON CONFORMANCE --------------------------------------------- 3

4.2. NON CONFORMANCE CLASIFICATION ----------------------- 3

5. PROCEDURE ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4

5.1. GENERAL ------------------------------------------------------------------- 4

5.2. IDENTIFICATION AND REPORTS ---------------------------------- 4

5.3. CLASIFICATION -------------------------------------------------------- 4

5.4. DISPOSAL ------------------------------------------------------------------- 5

5.5. VERIFICATION AND CLOSURE ---------------------------------- 5

5.6. REGISTER ------------------------------------------------------------------- 5

6. ANNEXES ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 6


24/85


25/85



Version : 0

Page : 4 - 11

• Minor Non Conformance Any defect, at Construction Manager’s opinion, may be corrected on field without

engineering assistance. A Less Non Conformance does not affect the installation

adjustment or function. Client’s approval shall be obtained if required by contract.

• Mayor Non Conformances

Any defect which affects considerably the installation form or function and/or requires

assessment and Engineering disposal.

5. PROCEDURE

5.1 GENERALNon Conformance Reports are prepared to document technical failures and other Quality

Non Conformance not identified are solved through Quality Assurance Audits, technical

revisions and other control processes defined in other part of Quality Management

System. The requirements of this work instruction before the following activities:

• Non Conformance definition

• Identification and presentation of reports

• Clasification

• Purpose

• Verification and closure.

• Documentation

• Registers Annex F01301 Non Conformance Report shows Non Conformance Reports Form, from

identification to closure.

5.2 IDENTIFICATION AND REPORTS

Non Conformance may be identified by any member of the field personnel who are

responsible to notify QAQC Field Manager.

In reference to the identification of a non conformance. QAQC Field Manager shall start,

classify, produce and record a Non Conformance Report F01301 Non Conformance

Report in accordance with this work instruction.

Non Conformances may be identify by any person involved in the construction processand must be reported to QAQC Field Manager the very same day. QAQC Field Manager

shall be responsible for the verification through QC supervisors of Non Conformance by

qualifying it as minor or mayor and reporting in the form F01301_No Conformance Report

accurately where documentation will be processed; it will verify the application of the final

disposal and ensures the closure of Non Conformance report. Verification of the Non

Conformance will be recorded in the Non Conformance Report (NCR) and will be given to

the Field Engineering Manager for its verification in the workday; in general the

verification of NCR will be carried out with the departments involved in the listed remarks.

5.3 CLASIFICATION

Defect Clasification determines whether corrective measures may apply before revision of

engineering or not. Defects classified as minor may be solved without prior approval of

Engineering, possible defects classified as mayor shall be approved by Engineering

before the implementation of corrective actions.


26/85



Version : 0

Page : 5 - 11

5.4 DISPOSALNon Conformances will be evaluated by QAQC Field Manager, Project Manager, and

Superintendent responsible for discipline and others as necessary. Non Conformance

extension will be evaluated and disposal / corrective actions will be proposed and

recorded in NCR.

Proposed corrective action must be approved by Fluor QA or field engineering before

proceed. Fluor QA must be informed after completion for NCR closure verification

If the non conformance is classified as minor, proceed as follows:

• Engineering Manager shall correct the defect he deems prudent and necessary, then

record the “corrective action” taken in the Non Conformance Report.

• Non Conformance Report completed will be communicated, as set forth in Annex.

If the non conformance is classified as mayor, proceed as follows:• QAQC Manager shall check out the Non Conformance with the Discipline Leader or

person nominated.

• The report is transmitted to the Discipline Leader for revision, disposal/approval of

corrective measures.

• Corrective measures shall be approved by the person who recorded the non conform

element with the documentation approved in written as required.

Disposal which results in a product finished which fulfills with the drawings, specifications,

codes and regulations approved will be presented to the client for revision and approval

before its implementation. If the non conform element is not clearly pointed in the project

specifications, Mota-Engil shall propose the corrective measures with approval of

Engineering and the Client. Corrective measures proposed shall include the NonConformance cause as well as measures to prevent the occurrence.

5.5 VERIFICATION AND CLOSURE

The disposal of the Non Conformance will be verified by QAQC Field Manager. Project

Manager shall verify that the measures to prevent the occurrence have been taken. Non

Conformance Reports will not be closed until all the corrective actions and preventive

measures have been completed, long-term corrective measures have been established

and applied and all the applicable drawings and documents have been updated and

distributed properly. Final closure will be done with the signature of the Project Manager,

QAQC Field Manager and the client (if required by contract). In that way the Corrective

Action Report Form F01401 Corrective Action Report will be used.

5.6 DOCUMENTATION

QAQC Manager on field shall maintain each NCR in a file with supporting documentation

which may include:

• First notice which led the NCR

• Engineering results, technical evaluation and answer.

• Other information related necessary to document the disposal.

QAQC Manager on field shall maintain a NCR record which indicates the state of all Non

Conformance Reports (log de NCR).

5.7 REGISTER

Complete NCR (closed) and related documentation will be kept as quality registers and

will be delivered at the end of the project according to the procedures approved of the

Project.


27/85



Version : 0

Page : 6 - 11

6. ANNEXES

- Annex F01301 Non Conformance Report

- Annex F01302 Non Conformance Report Log

- Annex F01401 Corrective Action Report

- Annex F01402A Corrective Action Status Log

- Annex F01501 Preventive Action Log


28/85



Version : 0

Page : 7 - 11

Annex F01301 Non Conformance Report

•

NONCONFORMANCE REPORT ID A01301A

Tag Description: Tag No.:

P. O. No.: Inspection Classification Turnover System:

Subcontractor: Subcontractor Client Sub – System:

Fluor Other Location:

Initiated by: Date: Hold Tag

Yes No

NCR No.

Area/Loc ation Unit /Equip No. Discipl ine/Respons ib il ity:

DWG. No./Rev.

Spec./Rev.

Aud it No. (If App li cable)

DESCRIPTION OF NONCONFORMANCE

ROOT CAUSE

CAUSE CODE(S)

DISPOSITION Use as is Rework Repair Other

DISPOSITION BY Design Eng. Approval Req.

Construction Engineer DateYes No

DISPOSITION

COMPLETED BYContractor Date

Design Engineer Date

ACTION VERIFIED AND NON-CONFORMANCE CLOSED

VERIFICATION METHOD

DOC REVIEW INSPECTION OTHER

FLUOR INSPECTOR DATE

FLUOR-VERIFIED DISPOSITION AND RECOMMENDED CLOSURE OF NCR

FLUOR SITE QUALITY MANAGER

DATE


29/85



Version : 0

Page : 8 - 11

Annex F01302 Non Conformance Report Log

NONCONFORMANCE REPORT LOG ID A01302

Page _______of _______

NCR No. DisciplineHold

TagDate Opened Date Closed Description of Nonconformance


30/85



Version : 0

Page : 9 - 11

Annex F01401 Corrective Action Report

CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT ID A01401A

1 - Identification

Supplier Name: Contract/P.O. No.: Date:

CAR Number: Originator:

Personnel contracted: Discipline:

2 - Nonconformity

Reference:

Requirement:

Description:

Contributing Cause(s): [List code number(s) see Att. 1 of 000 509 0140]

3 – Correction of Nonconformity (By Responsible Person)

Plan to address the Nonconformity (e.g. correct/repair/waiver) Estimated Completion Date:

4 – Corrective Action Section (By Responsible Person)

In the judgement of the Responsible Person, is an analysis of the root cause(s) of this nonconformityrequired (including determining a plan to prevent recurrence) in light of the magnitude of the problem andthe risk involved? (If Yes, continue: if no, mark N/A below). Yes / No

Root Cause(s): List code number(s) see 000.509.0140.att. 1, and explain underlying reason whynonconformity occurred

Plan to Prevent Recurrence: Estimated Completion Date:

Responsible Person: Date:

5 – Closeout Verification

Correction of Nonconformity:

Verifier: Date:

Corrective Action Implemented and Effective: (only completed when a root cause was determined see4 above)

Evaluator: Date:


31/85



Version : 0

Page : 10 - 11

Annex F01402A Corrective Action Status Log

CORRECTIVE ACTION STATUS LOG ID A01402A

CAR No.Date

InitiatedDescription of CAR Contractor/Supplier Contract/P.O. No. Responsible Person

ResponseReceived Date

DateClosed


32/85


33/85

PROCEDURECode:K101-QC-PL-PR-002

QUALITY CONTROL AUDITSVersion : 0

Page : 1 - 7

Annex 2


PROCEDURE: QUALITY CONTROL AUDITS



34/85



Page : 2 - 7

TABLE OF CONTENT

PAGE

1. OBJECT 3

2. SCOPE 3

3.

DEFINITIONS 3

4. REFERENCES 3

5. RESPONSIBILITIES 3

5.1 PROJECT MANAGER ON FIELD 3

5.2 QA / QC MANAGER 3

6. REQUIREMENTS 3

6.1 AUDIT PLAN 3

6.2

NOTICE 3

6.3 AUDIT DEVELOPMENT 4

6.4 AUDIT RESULTS 4

6.5 CORRECTIVE ACTION / CLOSURE AND SIGNATURE 4

6.6 AUDIT REPORT 4

6.7 REGISTERS 5

6.8 AUDIT PERSONNEL 5

7. ANNEXES 5


35/85



Page : 3 - 7

1. OBJECTThis Procedure provides requirements and methods to plan, perform, report and close the

Quality Control Audits related to the Project.

The purpose of these audits is to evaluate the implementation of the Project Quality

System.

2. SCOPEQuality Control Audits are under direction of QA / QC Manager, frequency and schedule

of Quality Control Audits shall be established since the beginning of the project.

When determine the Quality Control Audits Schedule, planning and advance or work in

the project shall be taken into account.Quality Control Audits are performed by using the Quality System criteria established in

the Assurance and Quality Control Plan. These criteria also include the corresponding

specifications, instructive, drawings and procedures on field.

3. DEFINITIONS Analysis and systems managements to identify and then to correct different vulnerabilities

which may present in an exhaustive revision of the working processes.

4. REFERENCESISO 9001-2008.

5. RESPONSIBILITIES

5.1. PROJECT MANAGER

Responsible for determining which systems and departments shall be audited. The

manager is responsible to assure the corrective measures are specified according the

audits results and nominate necessary resources for this.

5.2. QA / QC MANAGER

QA / QC Manager is responsible to perform the systems and departments audits

identified by the Project Manager on field.

QA / QC Manager shall identify, nominate the personnel for the audit and providetechnical training and counseling to the quality auditors as required.

6. REQUIREMENTS

6.1. AUDIT PLAN

Audit Plan shall be created by the QA / QC Manager and presented to the Construction

Manager in charge of approving it. This plan shall be checked during the year as needed.

Audits will be carried out by using checklists. These lists will identify the quality

requirements to be audited, references related to the documents and verification method.

The list will also provide a space to take some notes about the audit results.


36/85



Page : 4 - 7

6.2. NOTICE

Project Team, including the Construction Manager will be notified about the audits in

advance. This notice will include Schedule of the audit activities and the name of the

auditor or audit team leader. The client will receive a copy of the project audit schedule

for revision.

6.3. AUDIT DEVELOPMENT

The audit will be preceded for a meeting in the work site to check the plan, establish

communication channels and present the checklist to be used in the audit. This list will

identify basic requirements; however it will not restrict the investigation of the audit when

results merit further investigation to determine the accomplishment of the Quality System

requirements.

When using such checklists, the auditor will verify the implementation of quality system in

the work. The foregoing information includes conversations with the personnel of work

procedures revision, registers, documentation, work trials and revision of finished and in

process works

An exit meeting will be carried out in the work for:

• Present Audit results and discuss which was observed.

• Define potential corrective action/s.

• Discuss attribution of responsibilities to apply corrective action/s.

• Establish a closure date of deficiencies and disagreements.

6.4. AUDIT RESULTS

Audit results will be edited by using the Quality Audit Results Form F01702 Rc Audit

Summary. This form describes Quality requirements, result, corrective actions

requirements and closure date scheduled.

Project Manager in Site will determine corrective actions considering:

• Possible necessity of further investigations to identify completely the scope and

severity of results in order to the cause may be determined and corrected.

• Possible necessity to modify or check the quality system procedures to describe the

real practices which fulfill with the basic requirements of the quality system.

6.5. CORRECTIVE ACTION / CLOSURE AND SIGNATURE

If it is not possible an agreement during the exit meeting in the Work, the auditor or

auditor team leader with the Construction Manager will put forward a solution. The agreed

results will be written in the Quality Audit Results.

The Area or Audited Disciplines are responsible to determine the necessary actions to

correct failures pointed out in the Quality Audit Results within the closure dates

established.

QA / QC Manager is responsible to determine the corrective actions required in the

corporative manuals to deal with failures described in the Quality Audit Results and

establish closure dates for them.

Supervisors of the Audited Discipline shall verify the implementation of every correctiveaction.


37/85



Page : 5 - 7

6.6. AUDIT REPORT

The auditor or audit team leader shall prepare a written report which will include:

• Description of the Audit, including the scope thereof and an evaluation about the

global effectiveness of the quality control system to be audited.

• Summary of the audit results and conclusions pointing out whether the work is

performing or not a quality work with enough safety.

Quality Audit Results (with corrective actions and Closure dates scheduled) will be

attached to the Audit Report.

Audit Reports will be handed out to the Project Manager, Construction Manager and QA /

QC Manager.

Upon receiving communication about the closure of Quality Audit from the auditors, QA /

QC Manager will notify the Project Manager and Construction Manager that corrective

actions have been implemented and the pointed failures have been closed in the Audit

Results.

6.7. Registres

A copy of the Audit Report, Quality Audit Results and Audit Closure Notice will be kept as

well as the Quality Registers of the work. A copy will be submitted to the client.

6.8. Audit Personnel

Experience and Training of every auditor should be proportional according to the Audit

assigned.

QA / QC personnel assigned to the audited Work or related to it may carry out the audits.

7. ANNEXES

- Annex F01701 Audit Finding

- Annex F01702 Audit Summary


38/85



Page : 6 - 7

Annex F01701 Audit Finding

AUDIT FINDING ID A01701

1) Project/Contract Number: Finding Number:

Project Name: Audit Date:

Auditor(s):

Auditee Personnel Contacted:

2) A. Reference:

B. Requirement:

Continued on back

3) Deficiency:

Continued on back4)

Proposed Disposition:

Expected Completion Date:

5) Corrective Action Evaluation, and Response:

Disposition (Action taken to correct deficiency) Completion Date:

6) Auditee Signature: Date:

7) Auditor Concurrence with disposition: Date:

Continued on back8)

Auditor Follow-up and Close-out Verification:

Auditor Signature: Date Deficiency closed:


39/85



Page : 7 - 7

Annex F01702 Audit Summary

AUDIT SUMMARY ID A01702

Project: Construction Audit Number:

Client: Audit Dates:

Project Number: Report Date:

Audit Location:

Audit Scope:

Summary of Audit Results:

Entry Meeting Date: Exit Meeting Date:

The entry & exit meeting were conducted with:

A summary of the audit results is as follows:

Quality Manual Principles assessed. Quality Manual Principles found to be satisfactory.

Deficiencies reported. Observations for improvement.

Previous Findings and Action Follow-up:

Finding Number Status – (Open or Closed) Date Closed

Lead Auditor Signature: Date:


40/85


41/85


42/85

PROCEDURECódigo: K101-QC-PL-PR-003

INSPECTION AND TESTING PLAN

Versión : 0

Página : 3 - 7

1. OBJECTThe purpose of This Work instruction is to identify the requirements for preparation and

use of the Inspection and Testing Plan (ITP).

2. SCOPEThis work instruction is applied to the Quality activities realized to the projects carried out

by MEP which include preparation, control and implementation of the Inspection and

Testing Plan (ITP).

3. RESPONSABILITIESProject Manager is the responsible for the management of this Work Instruction.

Prior to begin the construction activities, QAQC Field Manager and Project Manager are

responsible for the preparation and implementation of the Inspection and Testing Plan

(ITP). Project Manager shares responsibility of the application and performance of the

quality control program.

He is responsible for the compilation, updating and distribution of the Inspection and

Testing Plan as well as to ensure the coherence of the requirements presented in this

work instruction.

QAQC Field Manager shall check and evaluate the ITP and Field Quality Plan of the work

in progress continually, at least once a year.

QAQC Field Manager will be in charge of the implementation of every aspect of the

application of quality requirements during the construction, tests and pre-commissioning

phases of the project until Mechanical Compliance.

Functions of QAQC Equipment may include being witness of the inspections made by

other, the performance of inspections or additional tests, performance and coordination of

Quality Control Activities, technical assistance provision, evaluation of the reports

accuracy and integrity, and the maintenance of the Quality Control files.

For the responsibility of the elements defined in ITP in the column of Contractors, a direct

person responsible of the complete activity will be nominated. This person may be an

Area Superintendent, Contractor’s Supervisor or Subcontract Coordinator.Regardless of the specific responsibility assignments, general intent and requirements of

the work instruction herein must be understood and respected by the whole site

personnel. Copies of the ITP will be distributed to people who have responsibility

assigned by the QAQC Manager.

Under certain circumstances, the assigned personnel with QAQC responsibilities will

delegate the practice of the Quality Control activities to other competent person. This

delegation of activities shall in no way relieve the assigned personnel the last

responsibility of the activity.


43/85



Versión : 0

Página : 4 - 7

4. DEFINITIONS

4.1. QUALITY ASSURANCE

Organized schedule for the verification and documentation of every inspection needed,

evaluations and tests which have been performed to guarantee the conformity with all the

codes, regulations, project drawings and specification determined in the Inspection and

Testing Plan.

4.2. QUALITY CONTROL

Organized schedule for the inspections, controls and tests performed by qualified and

specialized personnel under guidance of written procedures which require clearly defineddocumentation to guarantee all the construction activities including manufacturing,

assembly and installation will be performed in accordance with the drawings,

specifications, codes and regulations approved.

4.3. Inspection and Testing Construct ion Plan

It is a process properly documented which lets the systematic and routing control of every

activity which affects quality.

This process is carried out through comparison, tests, measures and inspections to

obtain objective evidence in the establishment of quality compliances in construction and

assembly works “Acceptance Criteria”.

4.4. CONFORMANCE REGISTER

Written documents in which materials or methodology used fulfill the requirements of

pertinent codes and specifications depending of work requirements.

5. PROCEDURE

5.1. GENERAL

Inspection and Testing Plan (ITP) (F70002 Inspection and Test Plan 2) sets:

• Acceptance.Criterion

• Inspection and Testing Length• Required Documents.

• Responsible people for inspection.

In the corresponding sections of Construction Specifications will be checked to identify

the acceptance criterion and the right reference (s), it is added to ITP a column named

“Acceptance Criteria”.

Along with the Quality Control Forms. ITP requires presenting the inspection / tests

documentation which have been done and accepted by the appropriate parts.

In accordance to ITP, the tests inspectors will be witnesses and should prepare

documentation (Quality Control Forms) as set forth in the ITP.


44/85



Versión : 0

Página : 5 - 7

QAQC Field personnel will make sure the corresponding documentation in the ITP

(Quality Control Forms) is followed and also the requirements set forth in the ITP are

fulfilled.

Inspection and Testing Plan shall be furnished by the Construction Manager and QAQC

Field Manager when the work starts. Both shall give a general vision to subcontractors by

defining their responsibilities with regard to the implementation of General Quality

Project Plan. During the Mobilization Plan, QAQC Manager shall prepare and check the

Quality Plans to determine the compliance of quality of the contract.

Field Manager shall have a copy of the Inspection and Testing Plan in the work.

Inspection and Testing Plan shall be created by the QAQC team of the project, focusing

primarily in the Constructive Quality Process Control.

The main actions to be performed in the Quality area for the compliance of this Plan are

as follows:

• Establish a Quality Plan of the Project.

• Establish the Inspection and Testing Plan.

• Manage the Project Quality File.

• Reposting Quality Documents to the Client.

• Provide counseling, audits and technical management for laboratories of material and

test equipment for Supervision and Subcontractors.

• Guide the implementation of the Quality Control in the project.

• Develop quality inspections and verifications.• Elaborate QA/QC reports.

• Develop inspections and Quality analysis.

• Control the effective Quality Control Notarization.

All documentation related to the Quality of the Project is responsibility of QAQC field area.

These may be protocols, data sheet, checklist and other special reports or any other

suitable document which must contain the following information.

• Reference to the Quality Control instruction applied.

• Identification of inspected elements

• Reference to other documentation as: drawings, procedures and specifications notpointed in the Quality Control Instruction.

• Method used for inspection.

• Supervisor’s signature (who carried out the inspection).

• Inspection date

• Inspection results, including the Non-conformance.in case of refusal.

All the information related to Quality Control will be ordered, grouped and filed to ease the

work of Pre operational tests and deliver it to the client.

The best form to order the quality documentation is to separate it in Area, System,

subsystem and equipments (an so forth) then every area will have its documentation

related to every discipline(civil, mechanical, electrical, instrumentation, piping, structuralsteel, buildings, etc.) complete.


45/85



Versión : 0

Página : 6 - 7

Every system will have its Notarization of each specialty and every equipment will also

have its own Notarization and Acceptance.

QAQC Field Manager is responsible of this information, its reposting and the client final

acceptance

5.2. FIELD INSPECTION REPORT (FIR)

Field Inspection Report is the primary means to document all the field activities and

inspections in absence of more specific protocols, its use combined with additional

protocols included in this section summarize a complete track record of the field activities.

Its functions are as follows:

• Record the compliance of codes, regulations and specifications through a written,signed and dated report.

• Provide a more precisely method to record the field labor, replacing logbooks and

complementing required Protocols.

• Provide a recording method for those areas which do not have such documentation.

Field Inspection Records are designed in such a way that may be used to record almost

any type of activity or inspection, next a description of some of the primarily uses of this

Form:

• Record the whole troublesome area or non conformance reports, such activity must be

recorded separately in individual forms.

• Record the whole activity which has reached the end of its activities successfully orinspections of an article (group or similar groups) performed in a date in accordance

with the section especially of the Checklist.

• Record in progress or final inspections. The owner’s acceptance of the final inspection

will be indicated by the owner representative’s signature in the corresponding section

of the Form.

• Record the satisfactory completion of a work process or several similar processes.

• Provide basis to create every extra protocol necessary to adapt to the needs of a

project a particular inspection.

Written registers will be those specified in the Quality Control Checklist, where two or

more registers, separated in a bar, any of them will be used depending on the contract

documents, type of activity or the adaptability of other protocols.Every certified report, factory test report, conformance certificate and head office report

must be filed on field.

With the purpose to provide an accurate methodology to keep and recover the

documented information, it will be needed an organized approach for filing the Quality

Control Protocols.

These files will be divided into numbered sections as set forth in the Quality Control

Checklist.

All the documentation will be kept in files which will be under the QAQC Field Manager

control.

Every record and report will reflect the section belonging to the Checklist and will be filed

with its corresponding documentation (including x-rays and laboratory tests) in the sectioncorresponding to the files


46/85



Versión : 0

Página : 7 - 7

5.3. FILES CONSERVATION

At the end of each Project, every testing report of QAQC will be filed in Dossier folders.

6. ANNEXES

- Inspection and Test Plan 2.

Inspection and Test Plan

Inspection and Test Plan Activity Description Project Name Project Location Project Number

Client Contractor Contract Number Document NumberITP 509 FXXXXRevision 0

Issue Date

Item Inspection/Test StageRequirement and

Acceptance CriteriaResponsibility

Scope of InspectionInspection/Test Record

CompletionSign-OffMota

EngilFluor Client

Fluor Client

Inspection Legend:

P = PerformI = InspectionT = TestR = Review and ApproveW = Witness (Notification of authorized inspection personnel required)H = Hold (Mandatory, do not proceed without presence of authorized inspection personnel or signed waiver)

Responsibility Legend:

CS = Fluor Construction SupervisionCEM = Fluor Construction Engineering ManagerQI = Fluor Quality InspectorCWI = Fluor Certified Welding InspectorRI = Fluor Receiving InspectorNDE = Certified NDE Examiner


47/85

PROCEDURE Code:K101-QC-PL-PR-004

ACQUAINTANCE OF QUALITY PLAN

INSTRUCTIVE

Version : 0

Page : 1 de 4

Annex 4


PROCEDURE: ACQUAINTANCE OF QUALITY PLAN INSTRUCTIVE



48/85



INSTRUCTIVE

Version : 0

Page : 2 de 4

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. OBJECT --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3

2. SCOPE ------------------------------------------------------------------ --------- 3

3. RESPONSABILITIES -------------------------------------------------------- 3

4. DEFINITIONS ------------------------------------------------------------------ 3

4.1. QUALITY ASSURANCES ------------------------------------------------------ 3

4.2. QUALITY CONTROL ---------------------------------------------------------------- 3

4.3. ASSURANCE EQUIPMENT ------------------------------------------------------ 3

5. PROCEDURE ------------------------------------------------------------------ 3

5.1. GENERAL --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3

6. ANNEXES --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3


49/85



INSTRUCTIVE

Version : 0

Page : 3 de 4

1. OBJECT

The purpose or this Work instruction is to declare the authority of the Quality Plan K101-

QC-PL.001 in this Project.

2. SCOPE

This Work instruction applies to the construction process activities realized in the field by

the whole personnel of Mota-Engil.

3. RESPONSABILITIES

Project Manager is responsible for the implementation of this Work Instruction during the

whole Project.

QAQC Manager on field is responsible to guarantee this work instructive is known for all

the people involved.

4. DEFINITIONS

4.1. QUALITY ASSURANCE

An organized program for the verification and documentation of all the necessary

inspections, tests, trials performed to guarantee compliance with all the codes, regulations,

project drawings and specifications determined in the Inspection and testing Plan.

4.2. QUALITY CONTROL

An organized schedule of inspections, controls and tests performed by qualified and

specialized personnel under the guidance of written procedures which require

documentation defined clearly to guarantee all the construction activities, including

manufacturing, assembly and installation are carried out in accordance with the approved

drawings, specifications, codes and regulations.

4.3. ASSURANCE EQUIPMENT AND QUALITY CONTROL ON FIELD

Person or people nominated are responsible for the implementation of procedures

comprised in the Quality Management Manual in this work instructive.

5. PROCEDURE

5.1. GENERAL

QA / QC manager on field shall guarantee the quality management plan is known and

applied during the whole project for the constructive control process.

6. ANNEXES

- MEP-GRH-PR003.03 Attendance list for training


50/85



INSTRUCTIVE

Version : 0

Page : 4 de 4

MEP-GRH-PR003.03 Attendance list for training

Tipo : Formato Código: MEP-GRH-PR003.03

Versión: O2

Página: 1 de 1

RUC

Fecha:

Hora Inicio:

Hora Fin:

Total de Horas:

Entrenamiento

K101-QC-PL.001_Quality Plan_Rev 0.pdf

Documents

Transcript of K101-QC-PL.001_Quality Plan_Rev 0.pdf