K-Project Final Evaluation Core Document
Transcript of K-Project Final Evaluation Core Document
K-Project
Final Evaluation Core Document
Part A: Project Content Total max. 50 pages
Full Title K-Project: GreenStorageGrid
Short Title K-Project: GSG
eCall ID: 2947528
FFG Project Number: 836636
Funding & Reporting Period: from: 01.06.2013 to: 31.05.2017
Date: 29.09.2017
Final Evaluation Report
K-Project >Short Title<
- II -
Table of Contents Please update the table of contents after completing all parts of the form.
1 Executive Summary ........................................................................................ 1
2 Intention and Goal Achievement ................................................................... 2
2.1 Initial Vision, Mission and Goals of the K-Project ..................................................... 2
2.2 Development and Goal Achievement ....................................................................... 2
2.3 Contribution of the K-Project to the Programme Goals of COMET ........................... 2
2.4 Future Perspectives ................................................................................................. 3
3 Fulfilment of Requirements & Implementation of Recommendations ....... 3
3.1 Requirements & Recommendations of the ex-ante Evaluation ................................ 3
3.2 Requirements & Recommendations of the Mid-Term Review .................................. 8
4 Research Programme ................................................................................... 11
4.1 Overall Research Programme ............................................................................... 11
4.2 Areas ..................................................................................................................... 11
4.3 Work Plan and Time Schedule of the Research Programme ................................. 13
5 Research Results & Outputs ....................................................................... 14
5.1 Publications ........................................................................................................... 14
5.2 Patents & Licences ................................................................................................ 14
5.3 Research Results & Technical Achievements ........................................................ 15
5.4 Success Stories ..................................................................................................... 49
5.5 List of Deliverables of the K-Project ....................................................................... 50
6 Cooperation between Science & Industry .................................................. 52
6.1 Partner Structure ................................................................................................... 52
6.2 Industrial Involvement & Interaction (Company Partners) ...................................... 52
6.3 Scientific Involvement & Interaction (Scientific Partners)........................................ 52
7 Organisation & Management ....................................................................... 52
Final Evaluation Report
K-Project >Short Title<
- III -
7.1 Organigram & Management Structure ................................................................... 52
8 Achievement of Target Values ..................................................................... 54
8.1 Research Programme ............................................................................................ 54
8.2 Research Results .................................................................................................. 54
8.3 Added Value .......................................................................................................... 54
8.4 Human Resources ................................................................................................. 54
9 Annex ............................................................................................................. 54
Final Evaluation Report
K-Project >Short Title<
- 1 -
1 Executive Summary Overview of research topics, key figures (budget, partners and staff in FTE)
Research topics:
Hydraulic energy storage
Grids and overall optimization
Thermal and chemical storage
Key figures:
Budget: ≈2.500.000 €
Partners:
TU Wien, Institute for Energy Systems and Thermodynamics1
TU Wien, Institute for Energy Systems and electrical Drives2
TU Wien, Institute of Chemical Engineering3
ANDRITZ HYDRO GmbH
ENRAG GmbH
EVN AG
Zementwerk Hatschek GmbH
ZT Hirtenlehner
Österreichs E-Wirtschaft
Siemens VAI Metals Technologies GmbH
STRABAG Energy Technologies GmbH
VERBUND Hydro Power AG
Voith Hydro GmbH & CO. KG
Valmet GesmbH
TIWAG - Tiroler Wasserkraft AG
Vorarlberger Illwerke AG
Employees: ≈50, equivalent to ≈8 FTE
Further information: www.greenstoragegrid.at
1 Institut für Energietechnik und Thermodynamik
2 Institut für Energiesysteme und Elektrische Antriebe -
3 Institut für Verfahrenstechnik, Umwelttechnik und Techn. Biowissenschaften
Final Evaluation Report
K-Project >Short Title<
- 2 -
2 Intention and Goal Achievement
2.1 Initial Vision, Mission and Goals of the K-Project
Please outline briefly the initial vision, mission and goals of the K-Project (max. ½ page)
The holistic project approach of GSG - GreenStorageGrid faces the new challenges related
to the rising shares of renewable energy in the European energy systems. In detail the
project deals with grid and storage technologies.
The storage and distribution of energy is one of the dominant topics of international energy
research. The main objective of the project GSG is the combination of regional optimisation
of the energy storage, the power grid and the power plants themselves. It is absolutely
necessary to optimise the interaction between consumption and increasingly renewable
energy. Especially the thermal, chemical and hydraulic storages with a direct connection to
the grid-requirements are looked at more closely. The relevant technologies are analysed
and applied with several optimization strategies as well as progressive simulation methods.
The numerical simulation will be validated with field measurements in power plants.
2.2 Development and Goal Achievement
Including major changes compared to the K-Project application/ project plan and reasons for
adaptations
No remarkable changes did occur, regarding the overall project GSG or its specific Areas.
One company partner had to leave the project from internal reasons (change in the area of
business) and was substituted by another company regarding both monetary and scientific
issues. Apart from this change of partners, two additional companies could be included into
the consortium as associated members.
2.3 Contribution of the K-Project to the Programme Goals of COMET
COMET Goals: Strengthening the new culture of cooperation between science and industry
to achieve joint high-quality research; Aligning strategic interests between industry and
science, thus enabling joint research expertise, initiating new scientific and technological
developments and preparing implementation; Bundling of players by using thematic
synergies; Strengthening Austria as a research location
As already mentioned in the project application, an all-embracing access to storage
technology and its connection to the grid was one of the core elements of GSG-project. This
provided favourable conditions for the TU Wien’s intensive collaboration in the national
“storage Initiative” of the Climate and Energy Fund of the Austrian Federal Government
(“Speicherinitiative” - http://speicherinitiative.at ).
Final Evaluation Report
K-Project >Short Title<
- 3 -
Additionally, the project made an important contribution to both inter-faculty cooperation as
well as cooperation between industry and science. It was one of the main tasks of the project
management to maintain the common “spirit” of GSG. In practical operation it became
evident that both the Scientific Advisory Board and the Strategy Advisory Board were able to
strengthen the necessary, steady interchange. Acting as an independent, international
steering committee, these boards also provided positive contribution for deepening the
cooperative character of the project.
2.4 Future Perspectives
What are the plans to continue the research programme/ network/ partnerships? Are there
any plans to sustain the project outcomes after the funding period?
Several efforts have been made to pursue the target of further cooperation projects.
Numerous funding applications have been made since the end of project GSG, which are
available in the funding agency.
It is also being examined deeply and steadily if cooperation with other universities and
industrial partners in the thematic framework of water protection, water technology as well as
hydro power under the framework of a COMET-Centre would be possible. In this context, the
energy market situation, especially the sector of hydraulic energy, represents a major
challenge unfortunately at present.
3 Fulfilment of Requirements & Implementation of Recommendations
3.1 Requirements & Recommendations of the ex-ante Evaluation
Please copy and paste the requirements & recommendations of the jury and explain in how
far these requirements/ recommendations were fulfilled/ implemented.
Requirements:
(1) “The Consortium must present a detailed work plan providing the context for the
proposed work, showing how this project is distinct from other current initiatives,
both within the Consortium and elsewhere.”
Final Evaluation Report
K-Project >Short Title<
- 4 -
Related Funded Research Projects:
Project
Title
Description in
key words
Funding
by
Cooperation
Partners involved in
the Project
Duration
from - to
distinction from GSG
SEES Sublake Elektrical
Energy Storage
FFG ENRAG GmbH,
STRABAG Energy
Technologies,
Vienna University
of Technology
2012-
2013
SEES focuses on the development and improvement of an isobaric
compressed air storage system. SEES pursues the strategy of
realizing this concept at the bottom of deep lakes. So the alignment
of SEES is fundamentally different from GSG. SEES has only a
cross-connection to the GSG-sub-project 3.1 SeLaTES: Storage of
the heat of air-compression could be an application for SeLaTES
(especially sand based active fluidisation thermal energy storage).
SYMBIOSE Cross-System optimum
hybrid energy storage
FFG ENRAG GmbH,
Vienna University
of Technology,
VKW
2012-
2014
The development of new potentials for distributed energy storages by
decentralized coupling of existing parallel infrastructures (electrical
power system, gas and thermal networks) is the basic idea of the
SYMBIOSE project. In GSG, we are aiming to achieve such coupling
on all system levels and the implications for an optimal grid structure.
ECOCEM Integration of a
gasification concept in
the cement production
process
FFG Vienna University
of Technology,
Hatschek
Zementwerke
2008-
2009
The ECOCEM project focussed on process simulation of different
cases of heat recovery from a cement plant. Seven cases have been
compared, one of this cases concerned the implementation of a
fluidized bed gasifier in combination to the cement kiln. ECOCEM-
project has no overlapping with the present comet proposal
Solid Heat
0
District heat by
thermochemical energy
storage in solids
FFG Vienna University
of Technology,
Wien Energie
Fernwärme Wien
2012-
2013
Project Solid Heat is a 1-year exploration project with the target to
evaluate possibilities for thermochemical energy storage especially
at low temperature applications. The project concerns an overview
about materials, reactor design and modelling as well as economic
aspects. The exploration project has been done to generate a
profound basis for further research activities (development of
materials and reactor design) in the field of TCS. So Solid Heat 0 is a
basis for subproject SolidHeat of GSG without any overlaps.
GECO Green Energy
Conversion and
Storage
FFG Agrana Bioethanol,
EVN,
Technologies,
Vienna University
of Technology
2011 –
2012
GECO focuses on hydrogen (in contrast to GSG); conversion of
surplus electric power into to hydrogen (electrolysis) which is then
processed with CO2 to methane or ethanol.
Super-4-
Micro-Grid
100% renewable
energy supply in Austria
KLIEN VUT - ESEA
Zentralanstalt für
Meteorologie und
Geodynamik
VUT - Institut für
Ingenieurhydrologie
und
Wasserwirtschaft
TIWAG
VERBUND Hydro
Power AG
Illwerke-VKW AG
2009-
2011
In the Super 4 Micro-Grid project, requirements for grid and storage
capacities under the assumption of 100% renewable supply with
electrical energy were assessed. In GSG, among other project
contents, we also consider thermal storage capacities and take a
look into the coupling of hydraulic and electric components in the
system also under transient conditions.
Ecovar Development of a
variable speed
generating unit
consisting of turbine,
permanent magnet
generator, converter
FFG Vienna University
of Technology
2010 –
2013
Contribution of grid stabilization is a common intention of GSG and
ECOVAR. On the other hand, the focus of EcoVar is different: The
project deals with the problem of covering a wide range of height of
fall, the development of a innovative control method for inverters etc..
DAMSE Europäische
Methodologie zur
Sicherheitsbewertung
von Dämmen
Verbund Hydro
Power
2006 –
2010
other topic
Final Evaluation Report
K-Project >Short Title<
- 5 -
Recycling von
Tunnelausbruchmaterial
Verbund Hydro
Power
2010 -
open
other issue
Relevant research assignments of other groups
Hydraulic Systems:
Planned R&D-initiatives regarding hydraulic systems are shown in the “Hydro Equipment
Technology Roadmap” published by the Hydro Equipment Association [Brussels, 2013,
report may be downloaded from: www.thehea.org]. A comparison between the priorities
outlined in this document (see figure below) and the planned R&D-issues in GSG clearly
show that the GSG’s consortium's access to the issues is on the one hand in accordance
with EU’s energy policy objective and on the other hand is GSG ahead of other initiatives: In
the “Technology Roadmap” the starting time of similar research projects is scheduled by
2015 and the projects will last up to 2020 or 2030 respectively while GSG will already start
on 1st of June 2013.
Grids:
As example, two ongoing European research projects are shortly described below. EcoGrid
EU (FP7): The key idea of EcoGrid EU is to introduce market-based mechanisms close to
the operation of the power system that will release balancing capacity, particularly from
flexible consumption. In total 2000 households on the Danish island Bornholm will by means
of more flexible consumption show how Europe can manage over 50 % wind power and
other fluctuating and less predictable renewable sources.
UMBRELLA (FP7): The UMBRELLA research and demonstration project is designed for
coping with growing share of electricity generation from intermittent renewable energy
sources as well as increasing market-based cross border flows and related physical flows.
The toolbox to be developed will enable TSOs to ensure secure grid operation also in future
Final Evaluation Report
K-Project >Short Title<
- 6 -
electricity networks with high penetration of intermittent renewables. It enables TSOs to act in
a coordinated European target system where regional strategies converge to ensure the best
possible use of the European electricity infrastructure.
The GSG project differentiates itself from the current ongoing research as it, in the area of
grids, especially tackles transient phenomena and the resulting requirements and
implications for coupled hybrid energy networks.
Thermal systems:
IEA SHC Task 42: Thermochemical Storage: This is a joint task with the IEA Energy
Conservation through Energy Storage (ECES). Within this task especially the possibilities for
TCS in connection to solar systems are investigated.
DLR: Solid heat storage, Latent heat storage, Chemical heat storage, Hydrogen storage:
The research of the DLR focuses on a wide range of storage technologies. Some alignment
of the DLR research has the same aim as parts of the GSG-sub-project 3.1. The consortium
of GSG has made efforts to enter into cooperation, but DLR has contracts with companies
which do not permit further cooperation.
Institut für Energie- und Systemverfahrenstechnik, TU-Braunschweig; KBB Underground
Technologies GmbH, SIEMENS AG, E.ON: Isobaric Adiabatic Compressed Air Energy: The
project deals with the storage of compressed air in cavern under isobaric conditions. The
compressed air displaces the brine at the bottom of the caver through pipes to a brine shuttle
bond arranged outside of the cavern (country side brine lake). For storage of heat they use a
spiral formed multilayer solid material heat storage (sand) as well as a system consisting of 3
different storage materials (water, thermal oil and molten salt). The alignment of the project is
fundamentally different from GSG and has only a cross-connection to the GSG-sub-project
3.1; e.g. the latent heat of the molten salt will not be used in the project. The sand in the
spiral formed storage equipment is not fluidized.
(2) “The work plan should demonstrate that the institute heading the Consortium has
access to the resources necessary to undertake all projects with which it is involved.”
The institute leading the consortium has years of experience in handling of research projects
in various, different sizes.
The institutions responsible for the individual areas, including the IET, are equipped with
appropriate technical capacities such as laboratory equipment, scientific literature, powerful
computers, licenses, etc.. Additionally the Vienna University of Technology, as the Austria’s
largest scientific-technical research and educational institution, has a legal department, a
central event management, facilities and an accounting department. A target/actual
comparison was shown in the interim reports annually.
Final Evaluation Report
K-Project >Short Title<
- 7 -
Requirements:
(1) “The Consortium should undertake a cost-benefit analysis of the expected results
to assess their suitability for commercialization.”
Due to the nature of the research project, at least for its parts of fundamental research, it is
not easy to give an estimation for cost-benefit relation at the moment. The fundamental
benefit of the research project can be derived from the expected results. A better adaptation
of the whole energy system on volatile, renewable energy supply is in the center of
considerations. A detailed quantification would currently contain a very large proportion of
guesswork, since individual, yet unforeseeable developments can have very far-reaching
effects in the complex energy system.
Regarding the fact that GSG will on one hand deal with hydraulic storage and appropriate
operation of hydraulic machines, one could, for the hydraulic area, give a possible scenario.
It is probable that situations in which the marginal cost of electrical energy production are
close to zero and also times when energy prices rise sharply will increase in the future. The
integral over the amount of the difference between a probable future price without GSGs
measures and the average electricity price represents the monetary potential of the project.
Similar considerations can be made for thermal systems. The problem of time-mismatch, the
problem of spatial- and exergy- difference between supply and demand of energy can be
seen in analogy here.
The considerations shown above should just give an impression of the planned basic line of
the planned cost-benefit-analysis of GSG, which will be developed parallel to the technical
parts of the project.
(2) “The proportion of strategic projects should be re-evaluated in line with the FFG’s
guidelines.”
As mentioned in the consortium’s original COMET-applications for GSG, especially sub-
project “2.2 StrukDRESS” was considered to “foster the synergies of the new technologies
developed in the other projects, in order to create a sustainable structure and strategies for
operation of a truly universal energy system, including increased storage facilities on all
levels.“ So this sub-project was conceived to be the core strategic part of the whole
GreenStorageGrid project. For this reason the table shown below contains a value of 100%
for strategic share for the case of StrukDRESS.
The remaining projects do also have a strong interconnection among each other. All of them
have a strategic share in line with the FFG’s guidelines as estimated below. The reason for
the specific values is given in the last column.
As a target value, the consortium has defined strategic projects’ cost-share of total costs of
one-third. As can be seen in “TablesOfApplication/3.ListOfProjects” the calculation shows an
weighted average of 32,56%.
Final Evaluation Report
K-Project >Short Title<
- 8 -
It is important to underline that none of the six projects are conceived as a single-firm project.
They exclusively have multi-firm and mainly interfaculty schemes. This can also be regarded
as the consortium’s attempt to establish an integrated project in line with the FFG’s
guidelines.
Project
single
firm
project
Strategic
share
[%]
reason for strategic share (in keywords)
1.1 - PSP-Grid-H
NO 30 transient behaviour of pumped storage in context
with increasing, volatile renewable energies;
relevant contribution to long-term-goals;
involvement of ANDRITZ and VOITH and use of
common simulation tool
1.2 - PSP-
LowLoad
NO 30 measurement of (very) low-load conditions is a
particular feature also on an international scale
2.1 - PSP-Grid-N
NO 40 special focus on coupling of electrical and
mechanical/hydraulic transients in pump turbines
contains scientific innovation
2.2 - StrukDRESS NO 100 as mentioned above
3.1 - SeLaTES
NO 30 storage is an important topic for a well-integrated
solution for the energy system’s challenges;
relatively far away from commercial application; 5
company partners
3.2 - SolidHeat NO 30 5 company partners
3.2 Requirements & Recommendations of the Mid-Term Review
Please copy and paste the requirements & recommendations of the mid-term review and
explain in how far these requirements/ recommendations were fulfilled/ implemented.
Requirements
(1) “The added value concerning the achieved benefits for the company partners was
not completed in the present written review report (chapter 9) and must be reported in
details in the final report.”
Assuming that the expansion of renewable, volatile energy will proceed, new control systems
will have to be found to ensure the stability of the European grid. The established power
Final Evaluation Report
K-Project >Short Title<
- 9 -
plant operators together with their suppliers will have to consider greater flexibility of their
existing production facilities. Hence, the energy balance in electric grids could be achieved in
the next years until new storage technologies can be applied in a reasonable economic way.
Regarding Area H, the additional value for the companies involved in GSG is based on
sophisticated measurements, accompanied by numerical simulations. Especially in the
operational region of very low load the occurring flow pattern and characteristic lead to a
higher damage of the hydraulic machine. Combining measurements with numerical
simulations gave a better understanding of the machine behaviour under these flexible
operation and subsequent a basis for new maintenance strategies. In terms of condition
monitoring the residual lifetime of hydraulic parts plays a vital role and the research project
focused to this point. The findings will contribute to the improvement of machine lifetime
analysis and diagnostics thus helping operators to better understand the fatigue of their
machines and a better utilization of the hydropower plants. In the future, cooperation
between operators and suppliers will focus more and more on flexible hydropower stations to
meet the grid demand and further instalment of renewable energy sources. On the one hand
the research results will help to build more comprehensive hydraulic machines and on the
other hand it will assist operators by running their machines in a better way. As operators,
suppliers and academia joined hands within this project and shared their knowledge, the
approved results are of common interest and have an added value for each partner.
The fact that TIWAG and Illwerke, two well-known operators of pumped storage plants,
joined the consortium is a clear indication that the project has a positive added value for
companies from the industry.
With regard to electric grid, various possibilities of energy supply, connection requirements,
decentralized electricity generation will be enhanced by the various findings of GSG.
The industrial partners in the thermal sector got a benefit in the field of latent and sensible
heat storage, as described in the success-stories and as shown in the report of the mid-term
review.
Together with company partners, scientific publications in journals and conferences have
been prepared and published. The most significant added value of GreenStorageGrid
resulted from the cooperation of companies working in totally different markets and
producing different products, associated with inter-faculty cooperation with and between
scientific partners.
Recommendations
(1) “Area 1 and 2: The variable speed pump-storage and generation with “full
conversion” allows fast dynamics at the electric power level, both for active and
reactive power. Additionally the use of some kinetic energy from the rotating
machinery could be investigated.“
Final Evaluation Report
K-Project >Short Title<
- 10 -
Currently, the subject of providing necessary inertia to the system is discussed within
ENTSO-E. Currently no market or products are defined for inertia in ENTSO-E Regional
Group Central Europe. However, the important role of synthetic and real inertia was identified
during execution of the project, and some joint publications within the project partners on this
matter have been placed.
Corresponding publications:
R. Schürhuber, A. Lechner, W. Gawlik: "Bereitstellung synthetischer Schwungmasse durch
Wasserkraftwerke"; E&I Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik, 133 (2016), 8; S. 388 - 394.
W. Gawlik, A. Lechner, R. Schürhuber: "Inertia Certificates - Bedeutung und Wert von
Momentanreserve für den Verbundnetzbetrieb"; Vortrag: IEWT Internationale
Energiewirtschaftstagung TU Wien, Wien; 15.02.2017 - 17.02.2017; in: "Klimaziele 2050:
Chance für einen Paradigmenwechsel?", (2017), S. 1 - 8.
(2) “Additional activities in the direction of using the future hydro power facilities for
the stabilisation of the grid (also for short term phenomena) could enhance the global
output and visibility of the K-Project GSG.“
Findings on the potential of large scale hydro storage has been used for investigating the
interaction of long term and short term storage potentials, combining knowledge found in
GSG and previous projects.
Corresponding publications:
Ch. Groiss, W. Schaffer, W. Gawlik: "Interaction between short-term and seasonal storages
in a renewable power system"; Poster: Congrès International des Réseaux Electriques de
Distribution (CIRED), Glasgow, Scotland; 12.06.2017 - 15.06.2017; in: "CIRED 2017",
(2017), Paper-Nr. 0169, 1 S.
(3) “In the 1st and 2nd Area a potential for successful commercial utilization exists,
but efforts must be undertaken to develop new functionalities to be offered for the
users. Especially in the domain of thermal and thermochemical storage, the possible
fields of use as future energy systems, in houses, in mobility and in solar thermal
generation should be integrated in the project results and documents.“
Some findings, especially in context with latent storage, should and hopefully will be used for
the development of decentralised, thermal storage systems on household level – depending
on the willingness of funding agencies to provide projects to the scientific partners in the
future. On the other hand, downscaling of the SandTES-System would be unrealistic
because of complex construction principle. Its application only makes sense in an industrial
scale from the consortium’s point of view.
Final Evaluation Report
K-Project >Short Title<
- 11 -
(4) “Consideration of external initiatives should belong to the actual local project. The
aspect of the positioning of the actual programme in comparison to other current
initiatives especially elsewhere should be treated with more emphasis.”
This was ensured by steady exchange between industry and scientific partners in numerous
meetings, conferences etc.
(5) “Efforts within the consortium should be increased in order to reach the target
values of publications in reviewed journals and of patents.“
In fact, practical experience in the GSG-project showed that papers in reviewed journals do
not necessarily have higher scientific quality than papers in conference proceedings –
especially in the context of industry-oriented research, which was in the focus of GSG.
(6) “Other research fields, which could not be covered by the present K-Project GSG,
could become interesting topics for follow-up projects, such as battery storages,
flywheel storages, fuel cells, power-to-gas.”
Several project partners of GSG already work in these research areas in different projects.
Exchange between industry and science as well as exchange between scientific institutions
regarding the topic of battery storage is ongoing (see comment in chapter 2.3). These
research topics are also addressed in several project applications as mentioned in chapter
2.4.
4 Research Programme
4.1 Overall Research Programme
Main Challenges, development, achievement of milestones & goals, main adaptations/
changes compared to the application/ project plan.
Please refer to the work plan in Part A: 4.3 if applicable.
As already mentioned in chapter 2.2, no significant changes have occurred on the level of
the overall project.
4.2 Areas
Main challenges, development, achievement of milestones & goals, main adaptations/
changes compared to the application/ project plan.
Please refer to the work plan in Part A: 4.3 if applicable.
Project 1.1 PSP-Grid-H: The Projects 1.1 and 2.1 are closely related. The models are
successfully developed and have been connected to one overall system. All defined
mile stones were reached in time.
Final Evaluation Report
K-Project >Short Title<
- 12 -
Project 1.2 PSP-LowLoad: In this project the research focus are in the development
of a method to determine the stochastically appearing flow conondition and to predict
the mechanical impact on affected components. Additional to the numerical
investigation site measurements on a power plant of an industrial partner have been
done in purpose for the validation of the numerical simulation results. All the define
mile stones were reached in time.
Project 2.1 PSP-Grid-N: It was decided to add a model of synchronous machine with
full converter as a third option for including hydro power in the grid. All the defined
mile stones are reached in time.
Project 2.2 StrukDRESS: According to the initial planning, this project could be
finished in time.
Project 3.1 SeLaTES: Because of construction delays in the provision of laboratory
infrastructure (laboratory building) the installation, commissioning and measurement
campaigns on the latent and sensible heat storage (sandTES plant), as explained in
the Mid-Term Review. In total, the goals set at the application of the project were
reached as explained in chapter 0
Project 3.2 SolidHeat: Project start of partner VT was 3 month delayed due to
unavailability of free staff. Nevertheless, the milestones were reached in time due to a
synergy with the FFG-project SolidHeatBasic (FFG-project number: 315679) in the
search for thermochemical energy storage materials. Further details are explained in
chapter 0 and in the Mid-Term report.
Final Evaluation Report
K-Project >Short Title<
- 13 -
4.3 Work Plan and Time Schedule of the Research Programme
Work plan of planned (approved) & actual status of the research projects including milestones.
Please highlight the most significant milestones (M1, M2, etc.) and the period of finalisation (F) of the research projects.
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4
Area 1 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Project 1.1 PSP-Grid-H (as approved) S M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 E, M6
Project 1.1 PSP-Grid-H (actual status) M2 M1 M3
Project 1.2 PSP-LowLoad (as approved) S M1 M2 M3 E, M4
Project 1.2 PSP-LowLoad (actual status) M1 M2
Area 2
Project 2.1 PSP-Grid-N (as approved) S M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 E, M6
Project 2.1 PSP-Grid-N (actual status) S M1 M2 M3
Project 2.2 StrukDRESS (as approved) S M1 M2 M3 E, M4
Project 2.2 StrukDRESS (actual status)
Area 3
Project 3.1 SeLaTES (as approved) S M1 M2 M3 M4 E, M5
Project 3.1 SeLaTES (actual status) M1 M2
Project 3.2 SolidHeat (as approved) S M3 M1 M4 E,
M2/M5
Project 3.2 SolidHeat (actual status) M3 M1 M4
Project 1.1 PSP-Grid-H (as approved) S M1 M2 M3 M4 M5 E, M6
Final Evaluation Report
K-Project >Short Title<
- 14 -
5 Research Results & Outputs
5.1 Publications
See Part B1: Tables “3. Publications” and “6. PhD & Master Theses”
Highlight 5-10 Key Publications
Rules and strategy concerning publications
In the first year, the consortium had a focus on making progress in content-related and
organisational issues. The aim was to get reliable results before publishing as it is common
in science. Therefore, the number of publication steadily increased hand in hand with the
timely progress of the project.
A compilation of key publications can be found on the GSG-Website:
www.greenstoragegrid.at > Inhalte > Publikationen
5.2 Patents & Licences
See Part B1: Table “2. Patents”
Rules and Strategy concerning Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)
Patents/ Licences (resulting from the K-Project) held by the consortium leader, by Company
Partners and by Scientific Partners
See Excel Sheet: 150918_CB_2240_review_k-project_PartB.xls, Table “2. Patents”
Rules and Strategies concerning Intellectual Property Rights have become contractual with
the help of the legal departments of both the university and the companies in the consortial
agreement. Patents /Licences are shown in the monitoring part.
Final Evaluation Report
K-Project >Short Title<
- 15 -
5.3 Research Results & Technical Achievements
Outcomes of the research projects
Project 1.1: PSP-Grid-H
In this sub-project different types of pumped-storage plants have been investigated and
compared against one another. The different pumped-storage plant schemes are:
Fixed speed PSP with pump-turbine (FSPT): This is the most common scheme, used
e.g. in Limberg 2 plant, Austria. A single hydraulic machine is used both for turbining
and pumping. The unit is connected to the power system via a synchronous motor-
generator.
Fixed speed ternary set PSP (FSTS): A scheme comprising two separate hydraulic
machines for pumping and turbining. The grid connection is the same as with the
FSPT scheme.
Variable speed doubly-fed motor-generator (VSDFG). A single hydraulic machine
operates either as a pump or turbine, speed variation is enabled by means of the
electric system, which consists of a doubly-fed asynchronous machine with a
converter in its rotor circuit. An example for this scheme is the PSP Goldisthal in
Germany.
Variable speed full size converter (VSFSC): The hydraulic machine is used as pump
as well as turbine and the synchronous motor-generator converting the mechanical to
electric energy is coupled to the grid via a full power frequency converter. In case of
one hydraulic machine this option offers the greatest possible flexibility in operation. It
is used in the PSP Grimsel 2 in Switzerland. Note that contrary to the configuration
investigated in this study at Grimsel 2 plant two separate hydraulic machines are in
operation.
Fixed speed ternary set PSP with continuous operating range (FSTS0): Same
scheme like the FSTS with the difference that both hydraulic units are able to operate
simultaneously in a so called hydraulic short circuit operation. This scheme allows for
regulating the power output from 100 % pump to 100 % turbine power e.g. in the PSP
Kops 2, Austria.
The three main points investigated are losses, the economic behaviour and the transient
performance. Each point is modelled separately in order to investigate one specific part of
the plant, but all three models can be connected to one overall model in order to investigate
the entire plant. The discussed structure is presented in figure 1 and all appearing blocks are
explained in the following sections.
Final Evaluation Report
K-Project >Short Title<
- 16 -
Figure 1: FSPT scheme structure in turbine mode
Automaton: This block enables the automatically investigation of several cases. The three
inner blocks can be executed one after another, parameters can be changed automatically or
a list of cases to be examined can be processed automatically.
Transient Block: The investigation of the transient behaviour is realized in the simulation
software SIMSEN. In this software all transient behaviour effecting components can be
modelled. These systems include the hydraulic, the electrical, the mechanical and the
controlling part of the plant. The development of the electrical part has been carried out in
close collaboration with the PSP-Grid-N sub-project. The models are designed in such a way
that they just need a power reference signal and predefined values of speed and guide vane
opening regarding on specific power output and gross head value, respectively, in order to
allow for feed-forward controlling. The power reference signal and the related guide vane and
speed values, respectively, are determined in the BEL and Power Reference Signal Block
and are described further on in this report. The investigation of the compensation of a fault in
the power system is one studied example case. Figure 2 shows the most significant
parameters of the plants (net head (Hnet), speed (n), guide vane opening (y), efficiency (η),
mechanical power (PMe) and power output (PEL,TF)) while compensating faults in the power
system. Pictured are faults on the generation side (Outage) and on the consumption side
(Surplus) for the FSPT, VSDFG and VSFSC schemes. These faults are compensated by
changing the operating points of the pumped-storage plants taking into account their physical
limits.
Final Evaluation Report
K-Project >Short Title<
- 17 -
Outage Surplus
Figure 2: Main parameters while switching from one operating point to another
The related frequency trends are presented in figure 3 for the FSPT, VSDFG and
VSFSC schemes in the Outage and Surplus case.
Figure 3: Frequency deviations caused by faults on the generation and consumption
side
Final Evaluation Report
K-Project >Short Title<
- 18 -
BEL Block: In this block the highest possible efficiency values are determined depending on
power output, and gross head values. Additional, the operating ranges are predefined. For
all schemes a minimum hydraulic efficiency of 80% is predefined with the exception of the
FSTS0 scheme, which is allowed to operate continuously between maximum absolute pump
and maximum turbine power. The determination of the operating parameters within this block
predefines the guide vane opening (and speed) for the feed-forward control. The highest
possible efficiency according to one specific head (Hgross) and power output value,
respectively, is presented in figure 5.
Figure 5: Efficiency depending on power output and gross head
Power Reference Signal Block: In this block, the offered power on the day-ahead market
as well as the offered power on the balancing energy market is determined by an
optimization task. The optimization task takes into account the current gross head and the
efficiency depending on gross head and power output. Subsequently, the actual gross head
trend and the actual income can be determined by the actual retrieved balancing energy.
Figure 6 shows the head trend and the quarter-hourly discretised power output for the
investigated schemes.
Final Evaluation Report
K-Project >Short Title<
- 19 -
Figure 6: Gross head value and operating points for the five investigated schemes
Work packages:
In this section the conduction of the work packages is explained.
1. Definition of requirements: The principal stated four-block model structure has
been developed, investigated types of plants have been chosen and the required
characteristics have been organized.
2. Setup of model components and required model expansions: Fixed speed and
variable speed schemes have been modelled in SIMSEN and GAMS as well as
binary and ternary set pumped-storage plants.
3. Integration into overall system model and validation: The principal stated four
blocks have been connected to one entire model and the models of the PSP-Grid-H
and PSP-Grid-N sub-project have been merged. Furthermore, for one binary and one
ternary set model validations have been executed by comparing the accuracy of the
models with the accuracy of real plants.
4. Simulation of defined cases: Detailed studies/comparisons of the different plants
have been executed on the economical side as well as on the technical side.
Final Evaluation Report
K-Project >Short Title<
- 20 -
5. Optimization of controller parameters: For the controlling of the guide vane
opening a sophisticated feed-forward control has been applied while the generator
controlling is realized by a multi-variable controller.
Conclusion:
Concluding may be said, that within this project detailed models of common pumped-storage
plants have been developed. The economic model can be used to investigate if planned
plants are profitable or not. Furthermore, operators may verify their bidding strategy on day-
ahead and balancing energy markets. The transient models have shown the technical limits
of the flexibility of common pumped-storage plants and their impact on the power system
frequency. These models can in further be used by operators for parameter studies and
optimization of their control strategy. By combining all four blocks, a virtual power plant is
generated, which enables a parallel simulation to a real plant or the simulation of a planned
plant in order to check its feasibility.
References:
[1] L. Ruppert, K. Käfer, C. Bauer: "Steady Efficiency Optimization of several hydraulic
generating unit systems"; Vortrag: 18th International Seminar on Hydropower Plants,
Laxenburg; 26.11.2014 - 28.11.2014; in: "18. International Seminar on Hydropower
Plants - Innovations and Development Needs for Sustainable Growth of Hydropower",
(2014), ISBN: 978-3-9501937-9-4; S. 477 - 486.
[2] L. Ruppert, K. Käfer, C. Bauer: "Optimizing Steady Operating Points of Several
Generating unit Systems for Transient Applications"; Wasserwirtschaft, 105 (2015), 1;
S. 63 - 67.
[3] L. Ruppert, Ch. Maier, C. Bauer: "Service of Different Pumped-Storage Schemes for an
Electrical Grid with increased Renewable Energy Generation"; Vortrag: 19th
International Seminar on Hydropower Plants, Laxenburg; 09.11.2016 - 11.11.2016; in:
"19th International Seminar on Hydropower Plants - Flexible Operation of Hydropower
Plants in the Energy System", (2016), ISBN: 978-3-9504338-0-7; S. 707 - 717.
[4] L. Ruppert, R. Schürhuber, C. Bauer: "Technisch-wirtschaftliche Untersuchung
verschiedener Großspeicherlösungen";
Poster: 10. Internationale Energiewirtschaftstagung an der TU Wien, Wien; 15.02.2017
- 17.02.2017; in: "IEWT 2017", (2017), S. 444 - 445.
[5] L. Ruppert, R. Schürhuber, B. List, A. Lechner, C. Bauer: " An analysis of different
pumped storage schemes from a technological and economic perspective"; Energy;
under review
Final Evaluation Report
K-Project >Short Title<
- 21 -
Project 1.2: PSP-LowLoad
Overview
In the context of the COMET K-Project GreenStorageGrid the modern challenges of the
pumped storage technology due to an increasing energy demand and high-stressed power
grids are determined in the sub-project PSP-LowLoad. To provide or use energy from power
grids as quick as possible Francis and pump turbines are operated more frequent and over
longer periods of time in lower part load. This leads to more turbulent operating conditions
and to higher requirements of the strength of stressed components (e.g. runner, guide or
stay vanes) due to unfavourable flow conditions.
The research focuses on the development of an approach to determine the mechanical
impact of different operating conditions on the fatigue of prototype Francis runners.
Therefore, numerical CFD and FEM simulations are performed on a medium and a high
head Francis turbine. The achieved results are compared with measured data from the
corresponding hydraulic machines to verify the accuracy of the applied models and methods.
The whole approach is displayed in Figure 1.
Numerical Investigations
To predict the lifetime of the medium and the high head Francis runner, numerical
investigations using CFD and FEM simulations are performed. The focus of the project is
related to the usage of open-source tools. Commercial software like ANSYS is used in
addition to validate the accuracy and applicability.
Figure 1: Approach for the lifetime analysis of Francis turbines.
Final Evaluation Report
K-Project >Short Title<
- 22 -
The flow and the unsteady pressure field in the hydraulic machine are computed with
OpenFOAM. Therefore, the components of the turbine, like the spiral casing, the distributor,
the runner and the draft tube, are modelled and discretized (see Figure 2). A mesh
convergence study is performed to evaluate the discretization error. The CFD simulations are
done in the appropriate operating points according to the site measurements. The results are
compared with the operating parameters, to validate the simulations.
Figure 2: Model (left) and discretization (right) of the high head Francis turbine.
To evaluate the static displacements and stresses on the turbine, the unsteady pressure
distribution from the CFD simulations is averaged over several runner rotations and then
applied to the structure using Code_Aster. A cyclic sector model is therefore used for the
FEM simulations (see Figure 3 left). To assess the dynamic behaviour of the structure the
natural mode shapes and the appropriate eigenfrequencies of the Francis turbines are
determined by a modal analysis. This is important to evaluate eventually appearing
resonances. The effect of the added water masses around the Francis runner is further
evaluated (see Figure 3 middle). The interaction of the rotating runner blades with the static
guide vanes (rotor-stator-interaction - RSI) produces an oscillating pressure field, which
harmonically excites the structure at the certain RSI frequency. This is more significant for
high head Francis turbines due to the smaller gap between the runner and the stator. Hence,
the impact of the RSI on the structure of the high head runner is obtained using a harmonic
response analysis (HRA). Therefore, the unsteady pressure field obtained by the CFD
simulations is transformed from the time domain to the frequency domain using a Fourier
transformation. The dynamic stress amplitudes are then obtained at the RSI frequency to
assess the mechanical impact.
Final Evaluation Report
K-Project >Short Title<
- 23 -
Figure 3: Cyclic sector model for the static FEM simulations (left); Model for the modal
analysis and HRA including the water volume (middle); Model for the transient FEM
simulations (right).
In part and low-load operation more stochastic flow phenomena are appearing in the
hydraulic machines (e.g. draft tube vortex ropes, interblade vortices) at uncertain or
broadband frequencies. Hence, a harmonic response analysis is not sufficient to determine
their influence on the fatigue of the runner. Therefore, transient FEM simulations are
performed using the full runner model (see Figure 3 right). The pressure distribution from the
CFD computations is applied to the runner surfaces at the according time steps of the FEM
analysis. The resulting stress signals are then used to assess the fatigue by the rainflow
counting algorithm together with the S-N curves of the turbine material.
Prototype Site Measurements
In March 2014 prototype site measurements at a high head Francis turbine have been
performed to evaluate the stresses on the runner during turbine operation. Therefore, eight
strain gauges have been attached to the suction side (SS) and pressure side (PS) of one
turbine blade (see Figure 4 left).
Final Evaluation Report
K-Project >Short Title<
- 24 -
Figure 4: Position of the strain gauges on the runner blade (left) and resulting stresses
during operation (right) of the high head Francis turbine.
The measurements were performed in different operating points from the start-up in steps of
10 MW respectively 20 MW to the maximum output power of 180 MW and back again. The
results of the strain gauge measurements on the suction side are displayed in Figure 4
(right). To validate the measurements and the numerical computations, the water was
drained from the machine during the last operating point (Rotation), to evaluate the strains on
the runner due to the centrifugal forces without any hydraulic pressure force. Additionally, to
validate the CFD simulations, the operating parameters, such as head, output power, guide
vane opening, pressure in the spiral casing and draft tube, have been recorded during the
measurements.
The same procedure has been done by the associated project partner Vorarlberger Illwerke
AG on a medium head Francis turbine with a maximum output power of 20 MW. The results
of the measurements have been provided to the project partners for further numerical
investigations on the according machine.
Achieved Results
The comparison of the numerical investigations with the prototype site measurements
reveals an appropriate agreement of both Francis turbines. In Figure 5 (left) the static mean
stresses σm obtained from the strain gauge measurements (EXP) and the FEM simulations of
the high head runner are displayed. The results are normalized by the yield strength of the
runner material σy. The load spectra of the stress amplitudes σa obtained by the application
of the rainflow counting algorithm to the measured and computed stress signals of the high
head runner are displayed in Figure 5 (right). The results at the strain gauge SS4 shows a
good agreement between the site measurements and the numerical simulations. The load
Final Evaluation Report
K-Project >Short Title<
- 25 -
spectra at the critical notches at the leading egde (LE) and trailing edge (TE) of the runner
obtained from the FEM computations are below the fatigue limit of the runner material.
Figure 5: Comparison of the measured and computed mean stresses σm (left) and
load spectra with the stress amplitude σa (right) of the high head Francis turbine.
For more detailed information about the applied methods and achieved results of the
numerical and experimental investigations in the course of the project PSP-LowLoad it is
referred to the related literature (see [1] - [12]).
Project Implementation
The implementation of the subproject PSP-LowLoad has been successfully fulfilled according
to the planned work packages. The overall output is more than initially expected, especially
due to the effective cooperation with the industrial partners. The project expansion by the two
associated partners Tiroler Wasserkraft AG and Vorarlberger Illwerke AG involved an added
value for the whole project.
Final Evaluation Report
K-Project >Short Title<
- 26 -
References:
[1] E. Doujak and M. Eichhorn: An Approach to Evaluate the Lifetime of a High Head
Francis runner. In: 16th International Symposium on Transport Phenomena and
Dynamics of Rotating Machinery, 2016.
[2] M. Eichhorn, E. Doujak and L. Waldner: Investigation of the fluid-structure interaction of
a high head Francis turbine using OpenFOAM and Code_Aster. In: IOP Conf. Ser.:
Earth Environ. Sci. 49, 72005, 2016.
[3] E. Doujak and M. Eichhorn: Impact of volatile electricity generation to the partial load
behaviour of hydraulic machines. In: Proceedings of the HydroVision International
Conference 2016.
[4] M. Eichhorn and E. Doujak: Impact of Different Operating Conditions on the Dynamic
Excitation of a High Head Francis Turbine. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2016
International Mechanical Engineering Congress & Exposition, IMECE 2016.
[5] A. Maly, M. Eichhorn and C. Bauer: Experimental investigation of transient pressure
effects in the side chambers of a reversible pump turbine model. In: Proceedings of the
19th International Seminar on Hydropower Plants, 2016.
[6] J. Unterluggauer, M. Eichhorn and E. Doujak: Fatigue analysis of Francis turbines with
different specific speeds using site measurements. In: Proceedings of the 19th
International Seminar on Hydropower Plants, 2016.
[7] M. Eichhorn, L. Waldner and C. Bauer, C: Fatigue Analysis of a Medium Head Francis
Runner at Low-Load Operation Using Numerical Investigations. In: Proceedings of the
19th International Seminar on Hydropower Plants, 2016.
[8] M. Wachauer. Numerische Lebensdauerberechnung einer Francis Turbine im
Auslegungspunkt. Diploma Thesis, TU Wien, 2016.
[9] C. Fischer. CFD Berechnung der Muschelkurve einer Francis Turbine. Diploma Thesis,
TU Wien, 2016.
[10] J. Unterluggauer. Lebensdauerberechnung einer Francis Turbine aus Daten einer
Anlagenmessung. Diploma Thesis, TU Wien, 2016.
[11] M. Eichhorn, A. Taruffi and C. Bauer: Expected load spectra of prototype Francis
turbines in low-load operation using numerical simulations and site measurements. In:
Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 813/1, 012052, 2017.
[12] M. Eichhorn. Fatigue Analysis of Prototype Francis Turbines Using Numerical
Simulations and Site Measurements. PhD Thesis, TU Wien, 2017.
Final Evaluation Report
K-Project >Short Title<
- 27 -
Projekt 2.1: PSP-Grid-N:
Motivation and Goals of Project PSP-Grid-N
The net generating capacity of wind and solar plants in the ENTSO-E area has been
continuously rising during the last decade [1]. The massive integration of renewable
generation causes an increase of of electrical power and grid frequency fluctuations [2]. The
frequency fluctuations are compensated by rotating masses of directly coupled rotating
machines such as generators, motors and synchronous condensers, while short-term power
fluctuations are compensated mainly by the utilization of energy storage systems and flexible
conventional power plants. Large-scale electrical energy storage has been accomplished
mainly by pumped-storage power plants (PSP), but during the last years more and more high
capacity battery storage systems come into operation in pilot projects (e.g. [3]). To adapt to a
more flexible operation scheme in terms of quick power supply, new technologies for PSPs
emerged during the last years, such as the hydraulic short circuit scheme and the variable
speed machines The two main technologies for variable-speed pump-turbines are the
variable speed doubly-fed generator (VSDFG) and the variable-speed full-size converter
(VSFSC) scheme. These technologies allow to participate in energy balancing markets in a
wide operating range, generating additional revenues for such pumped-storage projects [4].
However, capacities for pumped storages are limited and projects often are hindered not only
by economical, but also ecological considerations. So there will still be a need for flexible
thermal power plants that can operate efficiently and economically with high power gradients
in a wide operation range.
Hydroelectric power plants utilizing variable speed technology and their dynamic behavior
were studied in e.g. in [5, 6] recently. Investigations of thermal power plants and PSPs in a
single hydroelectric model was considered in [7–12].
To explore the behavior of different pumped storage power plant schemes in combination
with a combined cycle gas turbine plant (CCGT) also taking into account electrical and
hydraulic effects, , a new combined electrical and hydraulic model is introduced in this project
using the simulation tool SIMSEN [13].
Models and Network Configuration
The proposed model can be used for a variety of simulation scenarios e. g.
Load-frequency control, interaction of primary, secondary control and tertiary control
Storage management of water reservoirs
Market based dynamic simulations
Activation and changeover of operation modes of different pumped hydro schemes
(turbine mode, pump mode, synchronous condenser mode)
Figure 6 shows the SIMSEN model of the investigated network configuration consisting of a
grid, residual load, CCGT and PSP (VSDFG or VSFSC) model. The CCGT and the PSP are
connected to the grid by 100 km radial transmission lines. The residual load integrates the
power consumption as well as renewable generation such as photovoltaics and wind energy
Final Evaluation Report
K-Project >Short Title<
- 28 -
generation.
Modelling of the electric system
The electrical grid and the power generation modules aremodelled in SIMSEN and consist of
a pumped storage plant, a combined cycle plant, a lumped residual load and a grid
connection. For the PSP different schemes can be applied (fixed speed, variable speed,
ternary set). It is also possible to investigate this configuration in islanding mode, with
frequency deviation strictly depending on the power imbalance between load and generation.
Another option is to investigate the control capabilities of the generators in a wide area grid
(like the Continental European Power System). In this case, the control mechanisms of all
connected generators and loads in the network have to be taken into account. These
generators as well as the loads are summarized as part of the residual load.
In the following scenario, the frequency response of the ENTSO-E Continental Europe grid is
calculated based on [14]. Its static frequency limits are defined by a 50.2 Hz upper and a
49.8 Hz lower boundary. Dynamically these limits can be exceeded for a short time, but
deviations must not be greater than 800 mHz.
Figure 7 shows the frequency curves in a simulated case of the complete European grid with
control mechanisms for a 150 GW network with , and . The time
constant TA is a measure of total connected inertia of the system and thus an indicator of the
systems dynamical response (the higher Ta, the more inert the system reacts). A sudden
power imbalance of 3000 MW is considered, .In addition, the so-called trumpet curves [14],
which define a range of acceptable boundaries for the system frequency, are depictured.
Note, that the secondary control will relief the primary control after 30 seconds and has to
restore the frequency within 900 seconds (15 minutes). We see the large impact of the
system inertia on the grid frequency: The less inertia present, the higher the frequency
deviations from the nominal values in case of power imbalances.
Figure 6: SIMSEN model of the investigated grid configuration
Final Evaluation Report
K-Project >Short Title<
- 29 -
Modelling of the combined cycle gas turbine (CCGT) and selected results
Modern CCGT plants are characterized by high operational flexibility. In order to investigate
the dynamic behavior of a combined cycle power plant connected, the plant and the electrical
grid connection are modelled based on [15]. The implemented model represents a CCGT
with 266 MW electrical power output and consists of the thermomechanical subsystem based
on IEEE CCGT model [16] and the electrical subsystem connecting the plant to the power
grid. The gas turbine model includes the power frequency control, the gradient control, the
fuel control, the temperature control, the air control and the gas turbine model. The gradient
controller emulates the flexibility of power output of a modern combined cycle power plant.
Depending on the operation point, two power gradients are defined. Between 90 % and 100
% of the rated power output, the CCGT uses a gradient of 2 % per second to enable fast
response for primary control. For operation point changes between 50 % and 90 % of the
rated power, the gradient is limited to 0.2 % per second, with 50 % being the lower limit of
the steady-state operation range of the plant. A droop controller implements a 2 % droop for
primary control. Droop is the percentage change in speed required for 100% governor action
for primary control. The validation of the model based on typical parameters can be found in
Figure 7: Frequency responses to a sudden loss and surplus in generating capacity of
3000 MW (network size 150 GW) with trumpet curves for different TA
Figure 8: Frequency containment (left figure) and frequency restoration reserve (right
figure) control response of the CCGT to an outage after 10 seconds with TA = 10 s
Final Evaluation Report
K-Project >Short Title<
- 30 -
[15]. Two cases for load-frequency control responses of the CCGT are displayed in Figure 8.
It can be seen that while the primary response reacts to the frequency changes rather
quickly, the secondary response time is limited by the power gradient limits, which are
inherently induced by the plant technology.
Modelling of pumped storage plants (PSP) and selected results
The simulation tool SIMSEN offers a variety of electrical machine models and hydraulic
components. To enable combined electrical and hydraulic investigations of the dynamic
behavior of PSPs some simplifications are necessary. Especially the investigation of variable
speed PSPs needs short simulation time steps in order to model the behavior of the power
electronic devices used in such plants. In order to avoid very long simulation durations with
large memory requirements, the model used in this projects implements variable speed
machines (doubly-fed induction generators and full-size converter scheme) as controlled
power sources. This kind of modelling yields sufficient accuracy for the cases under
consideration, especially since the hydraulically induced transients usually are in the range of
hundreds of milliseconds to seconds and so can be fully considered in the simulations. To
investigate the control capabilities of variable speed pumped storages, different turbine hill
charts as well as limits for machine speed and operation mode changeover times are used
for different PSP schemes.
Figure 10a: Frequency containment control (primary control) response of the VSDFG
with limited rise time of 30 s to an outage after 10 seconds with TA = 10 s in turbine
mode.
Figure 10b: Frequency containment control (primary control) response of the VSDFG
with limited rise time of 30 s to an outage after 10 seconds with TA = 10 s in pump
mode.
Final Evaluation Report
K-Project >Short Title<
- 31 -
Different load-frequency control scenarios for the VSDFG and the VSFSC in pump and
turbine mode were investigated. The frequency containment control response considering
different active power gradients were calculated. A 30 s case study is displayed in Figure 10
(VSDFG, turbine mode), Figure 10 (VSDFG, pump mode), Figure 12 (VSFSC, turbine mode)
and Figure 12 (VSFSC, pump mode).
Compared to plants with a directly connected motor-generator, the fast response to the
power requests can clearly be seen. The figures show the limitation in the gradient of the
power output due to speed limit restrictions for the VSDFG, especially in turbine mode.
These restrictions are a consequence of technical limits of the power converter, which allow
only operation within a limited voltage, which transmits to a speed range in the VSDFG
connection [17]. As a result, the electrical power output of the VSDFG has to be limited to
avoid a violation of the lower speed limit of 0.9 pu. The VSFSC has a wider speed
operational range and therefore the capability to change power output in turbine mode faster
in a wide operation range.
Pooling of PSP, CCGT and Battery Storage
Finally, the combined operation of VSFSC and VSDFG with the CCGT and optionally a
large-scale battery was investigated. The goal was to show synergies between these plants
Figure 12: Frequency containment control response of the VSFSC with limited rise
time of 30 s to an outage after 10 seconds with TA = 10 s in turbine mode.
Figure 12b: Frequency containment control response of the VSFSC with limited rise
time of 30 s to an outage after 10 seconds with TA = 10 s in pump mode.
Final Evaluation Report
K-Project >Short Title<
- 32 -
for load-frequency purposes to achieve a wider operational range for the VSFSC, VSDFG
and the CCGT. For different frequency containment control scenarios with varying network
sizes, the necessary battery storage was calculated as well to accomplish todays and future
load-frequency demands with these power plant types.
Conclusion
The developed model enables investigation of the dynamic behavior of electrical and
hydraulic components of (variable-speed) pumped storages in combination with a combined
cycle gas turbine in a single common simulation framework. Simulations covering time spans
up to several hours usually exceed the simulation horizons when small time steps are
needed for the simulation. However, with the developed model different generator types for
pumped storages can be investigated for the load-frequency control capabilities and their
performance over such long time frames. The project has been performed in close
cooperation with parallel project PSP-Grid H. The approaches and models have been
successfully used also in the parallel project to allow long term investigation of pumped
storage power plants while considering hydraulic constraints and machine dynamics.
References
[1] ENTSO-E, “ELECTRICITY IN EUROPE 2015: Synthetic overview of electric system
consumption, generation and exchanges in the ENTSO-E Area,” 2016.
[2] R. Yan, et al, “The combined effects of high penetration of wind and PV on power
system frequency response,” Applied Energy, vol. 145, pp. 320–330, 2015.
[3] D. Colin, et al, “The VENTEEA 2 MW / 1.3 MWh battery system: an industrial pilot to
demonstrate multi-service operation of storage in distribution grids,” The 23rd
International Conference and Exhibition on Electricity Distribution - CIRED 2015, 2015.
[4] FfE - Forschungstelle für Energiewirtschaft e.V, “Gutachten zur Rentabilität von
Pumpspeicherkraftwerken,” 2014.
[5] Y. Pannatier, et al, “Transient Behavior of Variable Speed Pump-Turbine Units,”
Proceedings of the 24th IAHR Symposium on Hydraulic Machinery and Systems, Foz
do Iguassu, Brazil, October 27 -31, 2008.
[6] Y. Pannatier, B. Kawkabani, C. Nicolet, A. Schwery, and J.J. Simond, Eds, Start-up
and synchronization of a variable speed pump-turbine unit in pumping mode. Electrical
Machines (ICEM), 2010 XIX International Conference on, 2010.
[7] C. Nicolet, et al, “Pumped Storage Units to Stabilize Mixed Islanded Power Network: a
Transient Analysis,” Proceedings of HYDRO 2008, 2008.
[8] C. Nicolet, et al, “Benefits of Variable Speed Pumped Storage Units in Mixed Islanded
Power Network during Transient Operation,” Proceedings of HYDRO 2009, Lyon,
France, October 26-28, 2009.
Final Evaluation Report
K-Project >Short Title<
- 33 -
[9] C. Nicolet, B. Greiveldinger, J. J. Herou, P. Allenbach, J. J. Simond, and F. Avellan,
Eds, On the hydroelectric stability of an islanded power network. 2006 IEEE Power
Engineering Society General Meeting, 2006.
[10] C. Nicolet, et al, “Variable Speed and Ternary Units to Mitigate Wind and Solar
Intermittent Production,” Proceedings of Hydrovision Conference 2014, Nashville, TN,
USA, July 22-25, 2014.
[11] C. Nicolet, et al, “Contribution of Pumped Storage Units to Mixed Islanded Power
Network Stability,” Proceedings of HYDRO 2012 in Bilbao, Spain, October 29-31, 2012.
[12] A. Béguin, C. Nicolet, B. Kawkabani, and F. Avellan, Eds, Virtual power plant with
pumped storage power plant for renewable energy integration, 2014.
[13] C. Nicolet, et al, “A new tool for the simulation of dynamic behaviour of hydroelectric
power plants,” Proceedings of the 10th International Meeting of the work group on the
behaviour of hydraulic machinery under steady oscillatory conditions, IAHR, Norway,
June 26-28, 2001.
[14] ENTSO-E, P1 – Policy 1: Load-Frequency Control and Performance [C]. Available:
https://www.entsoe.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/_library/publications/ce/oh/Policy1_final.p
df (2016, Aug. 22).
[15] I. Grabovickic, “Modelling of a combined cycle power plant using SIMSEN,” Diploma
Theses, TU Wien, 2014.
[16] F. P. De Mello, et al, “Dynamic models for combined cycle plants in power system
studies,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems (Institute of Electrical and Electronics
Engineers);(United States), vol. 9, no. 3, 1994.
[17] R. Schürhuber, et al, “Stationary behaviour of different variable speed pumped storage
concepts,” Vienna, 2015´4.
Final Evaluation Report
K-Project >Short Title<
- 34 -
Projekt 2.2: StrukDRESS
WP1: Coordination with technology projects within GreenStorageGrid
To achieve this work package, between StrukDRESS and the other GSG projects data and
information were individual exchanged. This ensured the consideration of characteristics of
the new developed technology approaches in the other GSG projects. To complete the
exchange and verify the used data after the data collection process (WP2), a workshop was
held.
WP2: Collect capabilities and capacities of green storage technologies
Table 1 lists the most imported collected and researched characteristics of storage
technologies.
Table 1: Overview of the capabilities of storage technologies ([1], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7],
[8], [9]). The green technologies were researched in this project
WP3: Analyze and map with existing technologies
The following figures (Figure 13 to Figure 15) show storage technologies for the different
energy mediums electricity, heat and gas. Each storage technology uses up a certain area.
The height of this area is defined by the minimum and maximum power of the technology,
whilst the width is defined by the minimal response time (left boundary) and the discharge
time at rated power (right boundary). These points span a quadrangular area for the usage of
storage technology energy density power density energy Power loading time dynamic discharge time efficiency
Capacitor (EDLC) 0.1 - 10 Wh/kg 0.1 - 10 kW/kg < 10 kWh 1 kW - 1 MW 5 - 60 s 1 - 10 ms < 10 s 0.9 - 0.95
Coil (SMES) 1 Wh/kg 1 - 10 kW/kg 0.1 - 100 kWh < 10 MW < few min 1 - 10 ms 1 - 20 s 0.92
Fly wheel (FES) 5-90 Wh/kg 10 kWh/l 0.1 - 5 MWh 1 kW - 20 MW 1 - 15 min. ~ 10 ms 8 s - 15 min 0.83 - 0.93
Pump storage (PHES) 0.3 - 1.4 Wh/kg n.s. 10 MWh- 70 GWh 60 MW - 3 GW 10 min - 24 d 60 - 180 s 12 min - 24 d 0.7 - 0.82
Compressed air (CAES) 1.8 - 4.9 kWh/m³ 0.2 - 1 kW/m³ 10 - 2640 MWh 10 - 330 MW 8 h - 38 h 6 - 15 min 2 - 26 h 0.42 - 0.54
Lead-Acid Battery 25 - 40 Wh/kg 100 W/kg < 300 MWh < 50 MW 0,25 - 16 h 3 - 5 ms 0,25 - 16 h 0.74 - 0.89
Li-Ion Battery 110 - 190 Wh/kg 0.3 - 3 kW/kg < 120 MWh < 90 MW 2 - 4 h 3 - 5 ms < 80 min 0.9 - 0.97
Redox Flow Battery 15 - 50 Wh/kg n.s. 0.1 - 6 MWh 0,03 - 4 MW 20 min - 10 h < 5 ms 20 min - 10 h 0.7 - 0.8
Pore storage 9.4 - 11 kWh/m³ n.s. 0.13 - 188 TWh 0.18 - 108 GW 590 h - 9230 h 1 s 0.9 - 1.8 a ~1
Cavern storage 9.4 - 11 kWh/m³ n.s. 0.11 - 10 TWh 0.48 - 18 GW 20 h - 6520 h 1 s 0.8 - 62,5 d ~1
Gas cylinder 9.4 - 11 kWh/m³ n.s. 65 - 420 kWh 2.6 - 7.7 kW n.s. 1 s 25 - 55 h ~1
Pipe storage 9.4 - 11 kWh/m³ n.s. 6.1 TWh 950 MW 6.5 h 1 s 6.5 h ~1
solid matter storage LT < 500°C 0.6 - 0.75 kWh/m² n.s. 37.5 - 937.5 kWh 10 - 250 kW n.s. ~ 5 min 3,75 h n.s.
solid matter storage HT > 500°C n.s. n.s. 0.1 - 200 GWh 0.05 - 100 MW n.s. 10 - 60 min 83 d 0.7 - 0.8
deep geothermic 15 - 50 kWh/m³ n.s. 7.5 - 300 GWh 10 - 400 kW n.s. ~ 10 min 85 a > 0.6
small water storage n.s. 0.14 - 1.4 kW/kg 3,5 - 17,5 MWh 5 - 25 kW n.s. 0,5 - 1 min 29 d 0.75 - 0.85
large water storage < 2GWh 40 - 60 kWh/m³ n.s. 2 - 20 GWh 1 - 10 MW n.s. ~ 5 min 83 d n.s.
large water storage < 200GWh 40 - 60 kWh/m³ n.s. 200 - 1000 GWh 100 - 500 MW n.s. ~ 5 min 83 d > 0.95
PCM, anorg. salt hydrates n.s. n.s. 1,5 - 42 MWh 0.1 - 2.8 MW n.s. ~ 30 min 15 h 0.9 - 1
PCM, org. MT/HT 80 kWh/m³ n.s. 2 - 20 kWh 1 - 10 kW n.s. ~ 10 min 2 h > 0.99
PCM H2O (ice) n.s. 80 - 100 kW/kg 2 - 150 MWh 1 - 75 MW n.s. ~ 30 min 2 h 0.7 - 0.8
adsorption storage n.s. n.s. 2 - 40 MWh 1 - 20 kW n.s. 10 - 15 min 83 d 0.35 - 0.8
thermochem. storage n.s. 20 - 40 kW/kg < 2.5 TWh 0.0001 - 5 MW n.s. 5 - 60 min 57 a 0.35 - 0.8
mobile storage n.s. 10 - 25 kW/kg 1 - 1000 MWh 0.1 - 100 kW n.s. ~ 5 min 1.14 a 0.7 - 0.8
storage supported power plant n.s. n.s. 2 - 2000 GWh 0,05 - 50 MW n.s. ~ 10 min 4.5 a 0.6 - 0.8
sensible water storage n.s. n.s. 0.1 - 4 TWh 10 - 400 MW n.s. ~ 5 min 1.14 a 0.7 - 0.8
electric
gas
therm
al
Final Evaluation Report
K-Project >Short Title<
- 35 -
that storage technology. Some of the technologies have different response times for different
power levels, which results in non-square shapes of the spanned areas. If no general
assumption is possible, the areas are assumed to be square. The used data for the storage
technologies are taken from already installed units, from predictions in studies and from other
GSG projects. Both axes of the plots are scaled logarithmically due to the wide range of time
and power of the technologies.
Figure 13 shows storage technologies for the electrical grid. Non-electrical energy mediums
are also included (e.g. compressed air), as long as they are solely used for storing electrical
energy. Heat storages for example do not fall in this category, because they can also be
used in a heat grid and therefore will be mentioned separately. The figure shows the
existence of many fast electrical storages for short time periods, which can be used for grid
stabilization, like flywheel energy storage (FES), superconducting magnetic energy storage,
storage with electric double layer capacitors (EDLC) or several electrochemical battery
storages. Those technologies are faster than the lower boundary of the time axis of 20ms.
However, 20ms is the period of the fundamental 50 Hz wave of the electrical power grid and
therefore it is not necessary to observe smaller time ranges. For long term storage like day
and seasonal storage compressed air energy storage (CAES) or pump hydro electrical
storages (PHES) can be used. The colours of the technologies specify the kind of storage:
green for mechanical storage, blue for electrical storage and pink for electrochemical
storage.
Figure 13: map of electrical storage technologies. The colour mapping specifies:
green for mechanical storage, blue for electrical storage and pink for electrochemical
storage
Final Evaluation Report
K-Project >Short Title<
- 36 -
The heat storage technologies are taken from results of Area T of this project and existing
installed units. They are mapped in Figure 14. The majority of the heat storages have a
response time between one and ten minutes, whilst the discharge time at rated power
spreads beyond a year. For better comparison with the storage technologies of the other
energy mediums, only one year is pictured in the figure. All technologies with a higher
discharge time have an open border on the right side (no bold border line). The best use for
heat storages is, as expected, for long-term storage or day storage. The colour of the storage
technologies shows the Carnot efficiency of that technology.
Figure 14: map of heat storage technologies. The colour mapping shows the Carnot
efficiency
Several technologies for storing gas are shown in Figure 15. Gas can be stored in natural
underground pore storages with huge capacities. These technologies provide long discharge
times for long-term storage. Generally, Gas storages are scalable and can be produced for
many sizes. In Figure 15 only existing storages are mapped. The response time of gas
storages are generally short because of the gas is immediately usable after opening the
valve. If gas storages should be used to feed in to other energy grids, a coupling technology
has between the energy mediums has to be used that may reduce the response time (e.g.
gas turbine from the gas to the electrical grid).
Final Evaluation Report
K-Project >Short Title<
- 37 -
Figure 15: map of gas storage technologies
WP4: Adapt structures and operation of future grids
Figure 17 shows the mapping of conversion and storage technologies. The storage
technologies as shown in Figure 13 to Figure 15 are mapped in layers based on their energy
medium and coloured as follows: yellow for thermal storage, blue for electrical storage and
black for gas storage. The conversion technologies are mapped in each linked medium and a
coloured accordingly: green for conversion technologies between power and gas, pink for
power and heat and brown for gas and heat.
Figure 17 shows a detailed map of storage and conversion technologies of the electrical grid
along with the electrical network levels. If the same conversion technology is considered in
different energy systems the difference between the power values is caused by the
efficiency, e.g., the electrolysis process has an electric power range of 0.4 MW to 6 MW and
in the gas system the power is 0.24 MW to 3.6 MW. No conversion technologies have right
boundaries, since they usually have a lifespan of several years to several decades.
If gas power plants are stopped, their start process is usually not fast enough to fulfil fast
control mechanism like primary control since the start up time is too long. To be able to take
place in the primary control mechanism at least 1 MW of control power has to be provided
[1]. As shown in Figure 17, with a combination of battery storages and gas power plants fast
power responses would be possible. With a maximum discharge time at rated power up to
several hours and a cold start-up time of the power to gas power plant of 3h - 4h [2] even a
cold start-up would be possible. Apart from the requirement for provision of enough short-
circuit current; gas power plants could be stopped if not needed and started-up, if the power
Final Evaluation Report
K-Project >Short Title<
- 38 -
demand rises. Right now, some of the gas power plants operate in idle state to be fast
enough for the control required, which causes unnecessary greenhouse gas emissions.
The electrolysis and fuel cell is counted as one single system, since for some electrolysis/fuel
cell types the technological approach is related and therefore the limits (power and response
time) are similar. Fuel cells have comparable response times as gas power plants.
Therefore, the combination of battery storages and fuel cells could be alternatives to the
battery/gas power plants combination.
In an energy system dominated by renewable production, seasonal energy shifts due to
production fluctuations are necessary. This results in shifting huge amounts of energy and
therefor in rather few full load cycles. In the electric system, so far, from cost perspectives
only compressed air energy storages (CAES) and pumped hydro storages (PHES) are
suitable to fulfil these requirements. The gas and thermal storage system are capable in
storing big amounts of energy for long times. For future electric grid operation with dominated
renewable energy production, bidirectional couplings between the electric and gas or the
electric and thermal system are necessary. It can be concluded, that storage systems
located directly in the electric system (battery, capacitor, coil) are ideal for fast system
requirements from sub seconds to several hours or up to several days. Those technologies
are perfect for control and stabilization of the grid. For long time shifts, it is better to use other
energy systems, ideally the gas system and convert the gas back to electricity when needed.
The heat system can also be used for long time shifts, but the energy cannot be transformed
back to electrical energy. However, there are heat storage technologies for every time frame,
which means, that renewable overproduction in summer can be used to generate and store
heat for higher heat demand in winter.
Figure 16: map of all storage and conversion technologies. The colour specifies:
yellow: heat storage technologies; blue: electric storage technologies; black: gas
storage technologies; green: conversion of gas and electricity; pink: conversion of
electricity and heat; brown: conversion of gas and heat
Final Evaluation Report
K-Project >Short Title<
- 39 -
Figure 17: map of electrical storage and conversion technologies
References:
[1] S. Erben, “Wirtschaftlicher, energetischer und ökologischer Vergleich von Technologien
zur Speicherung elektrischer Energie.,” 2008.
[2] O. Freund, B. Ernst and J. Seume, “Anforderungen an konventionelle Kraftwerke für die
Transformation des Energiesystems,” Leibnitz Universität Hannover, Hannover, 2012.
[3] G. Fuchs, B. Lunz, M. Leuthold and D. U. Sauer, “Technologischer Überblick zur
Speicherung von Elektrizität,” 2012.
[4] ETG Task Force Energiespeicher, “Energiespeicher in Stromversorgungssystemen mit
hohem Anteil erneuerbarer Energieträger,” 2009.
[5] Mitsubishi Electric, “Mitsubishi Electric beliefert das Umspannwerk von Kyushu Electric
Power in Buzen mit Energiespeichersystem mit hoher Kapazität,” 03 03 2016. [Online].
Available: http://emea.mitsubishielectric.com/de/news-events/releases/2016/0303-
b/index.page. [Accessed 27 04 2017].
[6] D. Oertel, “Energiespeicher - Stand und Perspektiven,” 2008.
[7] STEAG, “STEAG Großbatterie Systeme,” [Online]. Available: http://www.steag-
Final Evaluation Report
K-Project >Short Title<
- 40 -
grossbatterie-system.com/. [Accessed 27 04 2017].
[8] D. U. Sauer, “Optionen zur Speicherung elektrischer Energie in
Energieversorgungssystemen”.
[9] M. Sterner and I. Stadler, “Energiespeicher - Bedarf, Technologie, Integration,” Springer
Verlag, 2014.
[10] Austrian Power Grid, “Ausschreibungsdetails Der Austrian Power Grid AG Für die
Beschaffung der benötigten Primärregelreserve in Österreich,” APG, Vienna, 2015.
Final Evaluation Report
K-Project >Short Title<
- 41 -
Projekt 3.1: SeLaTES
The subproject SeLaTES covered a large range of activities going from fundamental
research to numerical analysis, test rig design, erection and operation as well as techno-
economic analysis. The subproject suffered from construction delays in laboratory
infrastructure (new buildings), which are not within the sphere of influence by the beneficiary.
Nevertheless the project team succeeded to erect and operate during the project all planned
test rigs - the semi industrial laboratory SandTES test rig (see Figure 18), the fluidized
regenerator test rig, the fixed bed test rig (see Figure 19) and the test rig for the phase
change material (LaTES) (see Figure 20). Furthermore the conception of the measurement
and control system for the different pilot plants was also designed and implemented. The
control system includes also the control and regulation of a thermal oil plant which is used as
heat source and -sink for all storage test rigs. All test rigs can be operated in parallel from a
control room.
Figure 18: SandTES test rig with boiler
house which contains the thermal oil
plant and the phase change material
test rigs
Figure 19: 15 kWth fixed
bed-regenerator
Figure 20:
Single tube test
rig for PCM
SandTES
The SandTES sub-subproject deals with the core technology of SeLaTES; a novel sensible
thermal energy storage system (SandTES, see Figure 18) based on a combination of
fluidized bed technology and counter current heat exchanger characteristic. The project work
encompassed both research and engineering work and had one essential objective in the
successful commissioning of the semi industrial laboratory test rig. Different measurement
campaigns were carried out with the test rig under cold conditions. During these
investigations e.g. the back pressure at different heat exchanger height and mass fluxes (see
Figure 22) was analysed. The number of active wind boxes was varied in order to find
operational limits. Further experimental investigations had the objective of testing the
dynamic behaviour of the sandTES storage device. In these investigations e.g. the start-up
and shut-down behaviour, the reversing time of the storage material in the heat exchanger
(see Figure 21), the influence of the fluidization grade on the sand mass flux, the required
Final Evaluation Report
K-Project >Short Title<
- 42 -
degree on uniformity of the fluidization air distribution over the heat exchanger (HEX) length
and of the fluidization air distribution on the system stability has been analysed.
Beside these investigations also basic analysis was done to get a better understanding of the
viscosity of the storage material inside the fluidized bed heat exchanger as well as the
bubbling behaviour in the fluidized bed.
Figure 21: Measurement of the reversing
time of the storage material in the
SandTES heat exchanger
Figure 22 Back pressure through the
SandTES heat exchanger
Parallel to the experimental work a design program for the sandTES technology, which has
been written in the software package Matlab, was been developed. With the help of this in-
house design software it is possible to perform design calculations for SandTES heat
exchangers (sandTES HEX). The software allows in a first step a rough design of the HEX
followed by an accurate analysis which includes the calculation of all governing effects. The
software provides sketches of the sandTES HEX-design and all major components and
generates automated process flow sheets.
In addition to the development work for the design program also 3-dimensional numerical
investigations were performed for the sandTES HEX. These 3-dimensional numerical
simulations were realized with the software Barracuda which allows the simulation of
multiphase particle-gas flows based on the multiphase Particle-in-Cell (MP-PIC) method.
This method allows a description of the particle phase based on a particle probability
function. With these computations detailed issues for the test rig design of the sandTES HEX
e.g. the mixing behaviour of the storage material or the air mass flow density distribution of
the suspension within the sandTES HEX could be clarified.
LaTES
Within the sub-subproject LaTES, experimental and numerical investigations on the melting
and solidification behaviour of phase change materials (PCM) were performed. As PCM
sodium nitrate was used. Three dimensional numerical investigations on a first fin design
Final Evaluation Report
K-Project >Short Title<
- 43 -
(see Figure 23) as well as on basic geometries of finned tube designs for enhancing the heat
transport from the heat transfer fluid (HTF) to the PCM have been conducted (see Figure
24). Based on this fundamental work a second tube geometry was selected for further
investigations. All numerical work was successfully completed within the project period.
For the numerical simulation the enthalpy porosity model implemented in ANSYS Fluent was
used. Within this model the mushy zone constant is an important factor. This factor depends
on the PCM and must be specified by the user. This mushy zone constant is available
however only for a minor number of materials – especially for materials with low phase
change temperature. Therefore experimental investigations were performed to get this factor
for sodium nitrate. These experimental analyses are finished within the project.
Figure 23: Contours of the
temperature in pipe, fin and solid
PCM 330s after simulation start
(expansion considered)
Figure 24: Sketch of some of the investigated
finned tubes and corresponding chronological
sequence of the averaged charged power per
volume
As a consequence of the fire in the laboratory and the additional construction delays at the
new laboratory location, which are not within the sphere of influence by the beneficiary, the
planned experiments with our latent heat storage test rigs (single pipe and multiple pipe TES)
are only partly finished. For the first fin design the experiments are finished (for example see
Figure 26). For the second fin design the storage unit is under construction and the
experimental investigation will be done in june/july 2017.
Final Evaluation Report
K-Project >Short Title<
- 44 -
Stainless
steel
Steel
Aluminium
Cooper
Figure 25: Different analysed materials after
corrosion test and mass change of the single
probe during corrosion test
Figure 26: Temperature evolution
during charging and discharging
by using the first fin design.
Based on the low thermal conductivity of the PCM and the high operation conditions of the
heat transfer fluid (HTF, e.g. water or water vapour in industrial or power cycles), the heat
exchanger tube should be designed as a bimetallic tube. The fins are made of a material with
high thermal conductivity like e.g. aluminium or copper and the material of the tube has to be
steel due to creep strength requirements). It is well known that sodium nitrate in contact with
other materials can lead to corrosion. Corrosion tests with selected materials have been
undertaken (see Figure 25) and successfully completed.
Flexibility of industry and power plant processes
In addition to the development work the suitability of the different storage devices for
enhancing the flexibility of industry and power plant processes (e.g. batch operation) was
analyzed (as example see Figure 27). Different storage integration scenarios were calculated
and compared. The work on increasing of the process flexibility includes also a techno-
economic estimation of the additional costs for the storage integration.
Final Evaluation Report
K-Project >Short Title<
- 45 -
Figure 27: Flow chart of a power cycle with integrated sandTES technology to increase
the plant flexibility.
One result of this work was the receiving of a patent for a novel power plant set-up with an
integrated thermal energy storage device.
The tecno-economic analysis is scheduled to be finished by june/july 2017.
Analysis of other storage technologies
Beside the development of the two core technologies sandTES and LaTES within the GSG-
project other storage technologies were also analysed theoretically and experimentally.
During the project the scientific literature in the area of storage technology was continuously
screened. For the storage technologies fixed bed regenerator and fluidized bed regenerator
experimental and numerical investigations have been done. Laboratory test rigs for both
technologies were erected and extensive experimental work has been undertaken to
understand e.g. the transient charging and discharging behaviour of the regenerators under
different operation conditions (for example see Figure 28 and Figure 29).
Figure 28: Comparison of the temperature
distribution between measurement and
simulation during discharging process
within the fixed bed regenerator
Figure 29: Heat flux between storage
medium and heat exchanger tube in the
fluidized bed regenerator
Final Evaluation Report
K-Project >Short Title<
- 46 -
One and three dimensional simulations for the charging and discharging process have been
done for the fixed bed regenerator. For the one dimensional simulation of the fixed bed
regenerator a numerical model was developed while for the three dimensional model the
software package ANSYS Fluent was used. The one dimensional model was written with the
help of the programming language C and therefore it can be implemented in different other
software packages as subroutine. The numerical and the experimental results are compared
- an example for the results of the three dimensional simulations can be seen in Figure 28.
For the fluidised bed regenerator also a numerical model for quasi-stationary processes
which works by cell method has been written. This model is implemented in the software
package Ebsilon as a separate subroutine and therefore it is available for all process
calculations done with Ebsilon.
Final Evaluation Report
K-Project >Short Title<
- 47 -
Projekt 3.2: SolidHeat
Subproject SolidHeat has been defined as a basic oriented research project. The project
itself initiated the extension of research work to three succeeding projects: SolidHeatBasic,
Tes4Set and SolidHeatKinetics, where cooperation with other disciplines of science
(chemists and external partners) could be initiated. Valuable results returned back to GSG-
SolidHeat e. g. from SolidHeatBasics where a systematic search algorithm for TCS-Materials
helped to select and evaluate materials.
With the goal of finding suitable storage materials in work package 1 it was necessary to find
possible storage systems and then test them for their applicability first of all. To find possible
storage system, a wide systematic computer driven database search was performed in
cooperation with the FFG project “Solid Heat Basic”.
This synergy led to a search algorithm which found possible storage systems based a
thermodynamical database (HSC Chemistry 7). It paired the solid materials within the
database with various technical gases (H2O, CO2, O2, SO2). This method resulted in over
2000 possible reactions which were evaluated based on their energy content (>1MJ/kg),
useable temperature range (100-300°C), toxicicy and price (<10US$/kg).
The reactions were screened using an STA (simultaneous thermal analysis) to check their
reversibility. To test the most promising candidates under operating conditions a test rig
similar to an STA at a 100g scale was build, which is capable to online measure both, weight
and temperature signals (Figure 12). Additionally a test rig to test the substances with up to
10 bar pressure of the reactive gas was designed.
The most promising reactions are
Final Evaluation Report
K-Project >Short Title<
- 48 -
reaction energy
content
usable
temperature range price
2166 kJ/kg
RT-75°C
100-160 °C
250-315 °C
100 US$/t
963,4 kJ/kg 145 – 200°C 100 US$/kg
2300 kJ/kg 110 – 225°C 500 US$/t
2015 kJ/kg 320 – 400°C 100 US$/t
The reaction kinetics of the reaction of Mg(OH)2 is already described in the literature but or
the other three reactions only insufficient information is found. To identify the reaction
kinetics for the reactions the so called NPK method has been chosen and implemented.
Figure 13 shows the result of a simulation with the identified reaction kinetic of the last
dehydration step of FeSO4*H2O for different heating rates.
Additionally to the search for new storage materials, a special reactor designs capable of
handling gas/solid reactions is needed to implement such system on a large scale. Therefor
a cold model of a screw reactor was build to test the transport of cohesive bulk materials at
different tilts of the screw (0°, 30°, 60° ,90°). (Fehler! Verweisquelle konnte nicht
gefunden werden.Fehler! Verweisquelle konnte nicht gefunden werden.)
Furthermore the inflow of the reactive gas and the mixing of the bulk materal was
investigated. To do so, a numerical calculation, utilizing the software environment
“Baraccuda” (CPFD) was performed (Figure 33). This showed the importance of how the
Figure 31b: screw reactor in
45° position
Figure 31a: Simulation of the
dehydration of FeSO4*H2O with different
heating rates
Final Evaluation Report
K-Project >Short Title<
- 49 -
reactive gas is introduced into the reaction zone in the reactor. The calculated nozzle
positions were implemented in small cold model to experimentally validate the simulation
(Figure 16). It showed similar tendencies but some deviations, which must be considered
when building a reactor.
Parallel to the work mentioned above a process integration study for 3 industrial sectors and
an economic analysis have been performed.
The three industrial sectors are a steel plant, a power plant and a cement production site. All
sectors where analysed for the potential applicability of thermochemical energy storage.
Therefore contact points for a thermochemical energy storage system where identified. It has
been found that it is possible to utilize thermochemical energy storage to enhance the
flexibility of the process (power plant), and to use thermal energy more efficiently (e.g. to
connect a cement production site to distant heating grid).
The economic analysis showed the dependencies of various parameters (e.g. energy
density, cycle stability, transport distance) to the expected energy price for energy stored
thermochemically. It can be concluded that the cycle stability of the storage materials have
the highest impact on the energy price and the energy density of the material is less
important than expected.
5.4 Success Stories
List app. 5 Success Stories including Topic and Area (max. ½ page per Success Story)
See Annexes.
Figure 32: experimental investigation of
the mixing
Figure 33: Baraccuda simulation of
the mixing
Final Evaluation Report
K-Project >Short Title<
- 50 -
5.5 List of Deliverables of the K-Project
Deliverable Name Project Number - Name Delivery Date
Pilot plant performance, design of 150MW system, design of an EAF-
system 3.1 SeLaTES 30.4.2013
Model components (compiled files) 1.1 PSP-Grid-H 16.09.2013
Model components (compiled files) 1.1 PSP-Grid-H 31.10.2013
Model components (compiled files) 2.1 PSP-Grid-N 31.10.2013
Classification of storage materials 3.2 SolidHeat 30.12.2013
Model components (compiled files) 2.1 PSP-Grid-N 28.02.2014
Methodology for the lifetime description of hydraulic components
1.2 PSP-LowLoad 28.2.2014
Simulation results, fabrication demo, experimental results 3.1 SeLaTES 30.4.2014
State of chemical equilibrium 3.2 SolidHeat 31.5.2014
Classification of storage materials 3.2 SolidHeat 30.06.2014
Model description and complete model files 1.1 PSP-Grid-H 31.8.2014
Model description and complete model files 2.1 PSP-Grid-N 31.8.2014
Model description and complete model files 1.1 PSP-Grid-H 10.02.2015
Methodology for the lifetime description of hydraulic components 1.2 PSP-LowLoad 28.2.2015
Comparison and validation of the method with existing machines
1.2 PSP-LowLoad 28.2.2015
Report 3.1 SeLaTES 28.2.2015
Rector concepts and design concepts 3.2 SolidHeat 30.4.2015
Rector concepts and design concepts 3.2 SolidHeat 30.05.2015
System design report, cost analysis 3.1 SeLaTES 31.1.2016
Concepts for process integration 3.2 SolidHeat 31.1.2016
Overview of capabilities and cap. of GS-techn. 2.2 StrukDRESS 31.3.2016
First operation experience 3.2 SolidHeat 31.12.2016
Final Evaluation Report
K-Project >Short Title<
- 51 -
Comparison and validation of the method with existing machines 1.2 PSP-LowLoad 31.5.2017
Model description and complete model files 2.1 PSP-Grid-N 31.5.2017
Pilot plant performance, design of 150MW system, design of an EAF-
system
3.1 SeLaTES 31.5.2017
Simulation results, fabrication demo, experimental results 3.1 SeLaTES 31.5.2017
Report 3.1 SeLaTES 31.5.2017
System design report, cost analysis 3.1 SeLaTES 31.5.2017
System design report, cost analysis 3.1 SeLaTES 31.5.2017
State of chemical equilibrium 3.2 SolidHeat 31.5.2017
Concepts for process integration 3.2 SolidHeat 31.5.2017
First operation experience 3.2 SolidHeat 31.5.2017
Final report of results 1.1 PSP-Grid-H 31.05.2017
Final report on results
1.2 PSP-LowLoad 31.05.2017
Final report of results 2.1 PSP-Grid-N 31.05.2017
Final report 2.2 StrukDRESS 31.05.2017
System design report, cost analysis 3.1 SeLaTES 31.05.2017
Final Evaluation Report
K-Project >Short Title<
- 52 -
6 Cooperation between Science & Industry
6.1 Partner Structure
See Part B1:Table “4.1 List of Scientific Partners” and “4.2 List of Company Partners”
Describe the development of the partner structure including changes & adaptations and the
impacts on the K-Project.
Describe changes, adaptations and impacts on the K-Project etc.
See the explanations in the Mid-Term Review. Apart from the changes explained there, two
additional companies (TIWAG - Tiroler Wasserkraft AG and Vorarlberger Illwerke AG) could
be included in the consortium as associated members successfully.
6.2 Industrial Involvement & Interaction (Company Partners)
Cooperation policies, company partner contributions to the K-Project
See consortial agreement, and Mid-Term Review
6.3 Scientific Involvement & Interaction (Scientific Partners)
Cooperation Policies, scientific partner contributions to the K-Project
See consortial agreement, and Mid-Term Review
7 Organisation & Management
7.1 Organigram & Management Structure
Please provide the organigram of the K- project and describe adaptations/ changes in the
course of the K-Project compared to the application/ project plan.
Final Evaluation Report
K-Project >Short Title<
- 53 -
There were no essential changes in the structure of GSG-project. The following staff
changes occurred, compared to the original application:
Project 2.2 was project was started in 11/2015.Up to now, preparatory scientific and
organisational work was implemented by Wolfgang Gawlik instead of Michael Chochole.
Rainer Schlager left the project and was substituted by Christoph Maier. Alexander Winter
was working in Area N since 1st of October 2016.
Final Evaluation Report
K-Project >Short Title<
- 54 -
8 Achievement of Target Values See Part B1: Table “7. Target Values”
Describe the development and the achievement of target values and explain deviations from
the planned figures in the project plan where applicable.
Not applicable
8.1 Research Programme
Share of strategic research projects in the entire research programme
The stated goal of strategic shares of the individual sub-projects could be reached.
8.2 Research Results
Publications in relevant journals/ Patents/ Licensing
See part B
8.3 Added Value
Initiated Products and Processes:
Explain the achieved benefits for the company partners. Describe the achieved and potential
process- and product innovations initiated by the K-Project, the development into marketable
products or new processes. A quantitative as well as qualitative description is expected.
See the explanations in chapter 3.2. as well as the information included in the success
stories.
8.4 Human Resources
Number of Key Researchers (female/ male)/ Dissertations (PhD)/ Diploma & Master Theses
in the scope of the research programme
See part B
9 Annex Annex 1: References (aktuelle, gesamte Literaturliste)
Annex 2: Additional CVs (new key individuals only)
Annex 3: Success Stories