Jury Management Indices Report First Judicial Circuit · Jury Management Indices Report First...
87
Jury Management Indices Report First Judicial Circuit Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 Fiscal Year y 70 60 50 40 30 20 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 Fiscal Year Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly Data Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011 First Circuit 31.7% 31.1% 32.4% 32.2% First Circuit 40.3 43.8 44.9 41.5 Circuit Median 40.3% 40.2% 41.4% 41.4% Circuit Median 54.8 53.0 52.9 57.4 People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend 50 40 30 20 10 0 Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 05 06 06 07 07 08 08 09 09 10 People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly Data Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI 2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011 First Circuit 30.4 33.7 35.3 32.3 First Circuit 82.2% 77.8% 73.0% 68.3% Circuit Median 44.3 41.0 44.0 45.4 Circuit Median 65.5% 67.2% 64.0% 66.1% 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 Fiscal Year 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 Fiscal Year Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend 50 40 30 20 10 Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend 650 600 550 500 450 Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly Data Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011 First Circuit 25.0 26.2 25.8 22.1 First Circuit 164 138 131 168 Circuit Median 29 0 27 7 28 4 28 6 Circuit Median 132 125 122 122 0 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 Fiscal Year 400 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 Fiscal Year 29.0 27.7 28.4 28.6 132 125 122 122 Legend: Circuit Median Circuit Median Circuit Circuit Median Standard Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed by OSCA staff. Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 1 - 1
Transcript of Jury Management Indices Report First Judicial Circuit · Jury Management Indices Report First...
Jury Management Indices Report First Judicial Circuit
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
y
70
60
50
40
30
20
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011First Circuit 31.7% 31.1% 32.4% 32.2% First Circuit 40.3 43.8 44.9 41.5Circuit Median 40.3% 40.2% 41.4% 41.4% Circuit Median 54.8 53.0 52.9 57.4
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
0
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
05 06 06 07 07 08 08 09 09 10
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011First Circuit 30.4 33.7 35.3 32.3 First Circuit 82.2% 77.8% 73.0% 68.3%Circuit Median 44.3 41.0 44.0 45.4 Circuit Median 65.5% 67.2% 64.0% 66.1%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend650
600
550
500
450
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011First Circuit 25.0 26.2 25.8 22.1 First Circuit 164 138 131 168Circuit Median 29 0 27 7 28 4 28 6 Circuit Median 132 125 122 122
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
400
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
29.0 27.7 28.4 28.6 132 125 122 122
Legend:
Circuit Median Circuit Median
Circuit Circuit Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed by OSCA staff.
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 1 - 1
Jury Management Indices Report Escambia County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
y60
50
40
30
20
10
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Escambia 25.2% 23.1% 25.0% 26.0% Escambia 30.6 37.6 36.5 36.3State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
10
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Escambia 22.0 27.6 26.9 27.0 Escambia 88.0% 75.4% 81.5% 86.0%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend500
400
300
200
100
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Escambia 19.3 20.9 21.9 25.9 Escambia 115 96 89 114State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed by OSCA staff.
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 1 - 2
Jury Management Indices Report Okaloosa County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d80
70
60
50
40
30
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Okaloosa 51.7% 55.1% 53.5% 48.9% Okaloosa 68.4 64.2 65.3 57.5State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend70605040302010
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Okaloosa 54.1 48.5 60.6 47.4 Okaloosa 55.8% 58.8% 36.5% 69.4%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend70
60
50
40
30
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Okaloosa 30.2 28.5 22.1 32.9 Okaloosa 16 13 9 17State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
20
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed by OSCA staff.
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 1 - 3
Jury Management Indices Report Santa Rosa County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d70
60
50
40
30
20
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Santa Rosa 34.7% 33.5% 40.8% 39.4% Santa Rosa 55.9 60.7 69.5 55.1State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
10
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Santa Rosa 42.9 52.3 56.8 49.7 Santa Rosa 98.5% 100.0% 76.2% 22.7%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend140120100
806040
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Santa Rosa 42.3 52.3 43.3 11.3 Santa Rosa 30 21 26 23State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
20
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 1 - 4
Jury Management Indices Report Walton County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d70
60
50
40
30
20
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Walton 24.8% 26.7% 25.8% 30.7% Walton 108.0 41.3 35.3 42.0State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
10
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Walton 99.3 33.4 29.4 28.5 Walton 39.9% 54.7% 47.6% 59.6%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Walton 39.7 18.3 14.0 17.0 Walton 3 8 7 14State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
10
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 1 - 5
Jury Management Indices Report Second Judicial Circuit
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
y
70
60
50
40
30
20
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Second Circuit 42.7% 47.0% 41.9% 41.9% Second Circuit 42.5 39.4 45.3 48.9Circuit Median 40.3% 40.2% 41.4% 41.4% Circuit Median 54.8 53.0 52.9 57.4
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
0
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
05 06 06 07 07 08 08 09 09 10
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Second Circuit 34.5 31.4 37.0 39.5 Second Circuit 80.5% 82.5% 76.9% 74.4%Circuit Median 44.3 41.0 44.0 45.4 Circuit Median 65.5% 67.2% 64.0% 66.1%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend550
500
450
400
350
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011First Circuit 27.8 25.9 28.4 29.4 Second Circuit 117 113 87 96Circuit Median 29 0 27 7 28 4 28 6 Circuit Median 132 125 122 122
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
300
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
29.0 27.7 28.4 28.6 132 125 122 122
Legend:
Circuit Median Circuit Median
Circuit Circuit Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed by OSCA staff.
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 2 - 1
Jury Management Indices Report Franklin County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d70
60
50
40
30
20
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Franklin 27.3% 38.3% 41.6% 44.7% Franklin 32.0 74.0 101.0 83.5State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend70605040302010
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Franklin 27.3 67.0 86.0 66.0 Franklin 79.3% 40.3% 27.9% 39.4%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Franklin 21.7 27.0 24.0 26.0 Franklin 3 1 1 2State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 2 - 2
Jury Management Indices Report Gadsden County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d70
60
50
40
30
20
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Gadsden 37.1% 45.3% 32.4% 36.3% Gadsden 45.7 34.0 44.9 40.8State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
10
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Gadsden 37.4 27.5 36.2 33.0 Gadsden 100.0% 100.0% 99.4% 99.5%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend908070605040
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Gadsden 37.4 27.5 36.0 32.8 Gadsden 12 14 13 17State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
30
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 2 - 3
Jury Management Indices Report Jefferson County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d90807060504030
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Jefferson 40.6% 38.0% 34.5% 43.4% Jefferson 64.3 47.5 76.0 92.0State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend100
80
60
40
20
0
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Jefferson 57.0 47.5 69.0 76.0 Jefferson 12.9% 21.1% 10.1% 10.5%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend605040302010
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Jefferson 7.3 10.0 7.0 8.0 Jefferson 3 2 1 1State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 2 - 4
Jury Management Indices Report Leon County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d60
50
40
30
20
10
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Leon 44.4% 47.6% 44.2% 42.8% Leon 41.4 38.8 44.4 50.5State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
10
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Leon 33.2 30.4 36.0 40.5 Leon 82.8% 84.3% 76.5% 72.7%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend400
320
240
160
80
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Leon 27.5 25.6 27.5 29.4 Leon 92 93 65 70State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 2 - 5
Jury Management Indices Report Liberty County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d70
60
50
40
30
20
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Liberty 31.1% 36.4% 31.4% 33.3% Liberty 64.0 105.0 42.7 37.3State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
10
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Liberty 57.5 91.0 40.3 33.8 Liberty 34.8% 40.7% 37.2% 66.7%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Liberty 20.0 37.0 15.0 22.5 Liberty 2 1 3 4State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 2 - 6
Jury Management Indices Report Wakulla County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d70
60
50
40
30
20
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Wakulla 54.4% 63.0% 59.8% 63.0% Wakulla 39.8 48.5 42.0 27.5State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
10
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend180%
140%
100%
60%
20%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Wakulla 32.8 45.0 32.3 27.5 Wakulla 87.2% 87.8% 107.0% 96.4%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Wakulla 28.6 39.5 34.5 26.5 Wakulla 5 2 4 2State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
10
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 2 - 7
Jury Management Indices Report Third Judicial Circuit
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
y
70
60
50
40
30
20
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Third Circuit 31.3% 39.5% 49.2% 32.0% Third Circuit 54.4 33.1 57.9 44.3Circuit Median 40.3% 40.2% 41.4% 41.4% Circuit Median 54.8 53.0 52.9 57.4
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
0
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
05 06 06 07 07 08 08 09 09 10
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Third Circuit 49.6 29.2 56.5 39.7 Third Circuit 63.4% 94.5% 66.0% 77.4%Circuit Median 44.3 41.0 44.0 45.4 Circuit Median 65.5% 67.2% 64.0% 66.1%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend550
450
350
250
150
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Third Circuit 31.4 27.6 37.3 30.7 Third Circuit 16 22 15 20Circuit Median 29 0 27 7 28 4 28 6 Circuit Median 132 125 122 122
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
50
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
29.0 27.7 28.4 28.6 132 125 122 122
Legend:
Circuit Median Circuit Median
Circuit Circuit Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed by OSCA staff.
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 3 - 1
Jury Management Indices Report Columbia County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d70
60
50
40
30
20
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Columbia 39.2% 39.9% 59.4% 44.0% Columbia 31.2 46.2 37.0 55.4State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
10
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Columbia 31.2 46.2 37.0 55.4 Columbia 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend70
60
50
40
30
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Columbia 31.2 46.2 37.0 55.4 Columbia 6 5 6 5State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
20
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 3 - 2
Jury Management Indices Report Dixie County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d100
80
60
40
20
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Dixie 27.7% 26.1% 26.0% 10.7% Dixie 88.0 85.0 52.0 18.5State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend100
80
60
40
20
0
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Dixie 88.0 49.0 52.0 18.5 Dixie 71.6% 64.3% 50.0% 67.6%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend605040302010
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Dixie 63.0 31.5 26.0 12.5 Dixie 1 2 1State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
10
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 3 - 3
4
Jury Management Indices Report Hamilton County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d160
120
80
40
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Hamilton 34.7% 0.0% 34.0% 30.5% Hamilton 52.0 0.0 102.0 92.0State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend160
120
80
40
0
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Hamilton 52.0 0.0 102.0 61.0 Hamilton 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 100.0%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend605040302010
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Hamilton 52.0 0.0 102.0 61.0 Hamilton 1 0 1 1State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
10
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 3 - 4
Jury Management Indices Report Lafayette County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d100
80
60
40
20
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Lafayette 36.7% 38.6% 0.0% 33.3% Lafayette 22.0 27.0 0.0 0.0State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend100
80
60
40
20
0
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Lafayette 22.0 27.0 0.0 0.0 Lafayette 100.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend605040302010
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Lafayette 22.0 27.0 0.0 0.0 Lafayette 1 1 0 0State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 3 - 5
Jury Management Indices Report Madison County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d200
160
120
80
40
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Madison 38.3% 0.0% 39.2% 38.7% Madison 254.0 0.0 70.5 51.0State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend200
150
100
50
0
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Madison 230.0 0.0 70.5 44.5 Madison 3.5% 0.0% 25.5% 22.5%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend605040302010
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Madison 8.0 0.0 18.0 10.0 Madison 1 0 2 4State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 3 - 6
Jury Management Indices Report Suwannee County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d70
60
50
40
30
20
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Suwannee 19.4% 46.3% 25.3% 20.8% Suwannee 44.8 17.6 61.0 36.3State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
10
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Suwannee 34.2 16.2 50.5 30.5 Suwannee 74.9% 100.0% 100.0% 101.6%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Suwannee 25.6 16.2 50.5 31.0 Suwannee 5 10 2 6State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
10
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 3 - 7
Jury Management Indices Report Taylor County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend80%70%60%50%40%30%20%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d80706050403020
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Taylor 43.0% 36.5% 61.6% 0.0% Taylor 43.0 31.0 76.7 0.0State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend100
80
60
40
20
0
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Taylor 43.0 31.0 76.7 0.0 Taylor 100.0% 100.0% 31.7% 0.0%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend605040302010
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Taylor 43.0 31.0 24.3 0.0 Taylor 1 4 3 0State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 3 - 8
Jury Management Indices Report Fourth Judicial Circuit
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
y
70
60
50
40
30
20
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Fourth Circuit 30.3% 30.3% 32.8% 36.0% Fourth Circuit 46.2 50.9 46.0 57.8Circuit Median 40.3% 40.2% 41.4% 41.4% Circuit Median 54.8 53.0 52.9 57.4
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
0
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
05 06 06 07 07 08 08 09 09 10
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Fourth Circuit 34.7 38.7 36.0 41.4 Fourth Circuit 83.2% 73.6% 76.1% 67.8%Circuit Median 44.3 41.0 44.0 45.4 Circuit Median 65.5% 67.2% 64.0% 66.1%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend670
590
510
430
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Fourth Circuit 28.9 28.5 27.4 28.1 Fourth Circuit 158 137 138 158Circuit Median 29 0 27 7 28 4 28 6 Circuit Median 132 125 122 122
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
350
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
29.0 27.7 28.4 28.6 132 125 122 122
Legend:
Circuit Median Circuit Median
Circuit Circuit Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed by OSCA staff.
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 4 - 1
Jury Management Indices Report Clay County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d100
80
60
40
20
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Clay 35.2% 44.3% 32.1% 43.5% Clay 135.0 71.0 77.8 139.0State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend100
80
60
40
20
0
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Clay 122.8 56.3 66.1 94.3 Clay 21.8% 50.3% 34.1% 46.7%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Clay 26.8 28.3 22.6 44.0 Clay 4 10 9 7State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
10
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 4 - 2
Jury Management Indices Report Duval County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d70
60
50
40
30
20
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Duval 29.4% 28.0% 32.3% 34.4% Duval 43.0 48.5 43.2 53.0State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
10
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Duval 31.3 36.3 32.8 37.9 Duval 93.4% 79.0% 85.7% 72.7%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend600500400300200100
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Duval 29.3 28.7 28.1 27.6 Duval 149 122 120 143State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 4 - 3
Jury Management Indices Report Nassau County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d100
80
60
40
20
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Nassau 38.7% 37.5% 42.0% 43.9% Nassau 68.8 68.8 52.3 71.6State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
10
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Nassau 66.0 60.4 47.7 57.6 Nassau 30.3% 37.1% 46.6% 40.6%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Nassau 20.0 22.4 22.2 23.4 Nassau 5 5 9 8State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
10
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 4 - 4
Jury Management Indices Report Fifth Judicial Circuit
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
y
70
60
50
40
30
20
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Fifth Circuit 40.8% 41.9% 39.2% 42.3% Fifth Circuit 44.6 42.3 50.0 58.3Circuit Median 40.3% 40.2% 41.4% 41.4% Circuit Median 54.8 53.0 52.9 57.4
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
0
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
05 06 06 07 07 08 08 09 09 10
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Fifth Circuit 36.2 33.6 40.6 48.4 Fifth Circuit 63.8% 68.8% 55.3% 48.1%Circuit Median 44.3 41.0 44.0 45.4 Circuit Median 65.5% 67.2% 64.0% 66.1%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend550
500
450
400
350
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Fifth Circuit 23.1 23.1 22.5 23.3 Fifth Circuit 126 119 116 105Circuit Median 29 0 27 7 28 4 28 6 Circuit Median 132 125 122 122
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
300
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
29.0 27.7 28.4 28.6 132 125 122 122
Legend:
Circuit Median Circuit Median
Circuit Circuit Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed by OSCA staff.
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 5 - 1
Jury Management Indices Report Citrus County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d80
70
60
50
40
30
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Citrus 44.6% 43.3% 45.7% 54.3% Citrus 66.3 47.8 40.1 76.6State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
10
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Citrus 57.0 39.1 31.1 61.0 Citrus 38.6% 58.0% 63.7% 41.8%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend100
80
60
40
20
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Citrus 22.0 22.7 19.8 25.5 Citrus 6 12 10 10State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 5 - 2
Jury Management Indices Report Hernando County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d80706050403020
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Hernando 55.9% 52.0% 50.4% 54.9% Hernando 39.5 62.2 61.4 70.1State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend70605040302010
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Hernando 33.7 48.5 48.0 60.0 Hernando 83.2% 72.5% 93.0% 61.4%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend70
60
50
40
30
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Hernando 28.0 35.2 44.6 36.9 Hernando 12 13 8 7State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
20
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 5 - 3
Jury Management Indices Report Lake County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d70
60
50
40
30
20
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Lake 36.9% 40.7% 34.8% 39.0% Lake 46.6 56.9 49.4 50.2State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
10
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Lake 36.0 46.8 37.1 39.7 Lake 77.2% 51.2% 71.4% 59.7%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend150
120
90
60
30
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Lake 27.8 24.0 26.5 23.7 Lake 42 19 30 26State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 5 - 4
Jury Management Indices Report Marion County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d60
50
40
30
20
10
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Marion 36.9% 35.7% 39.6% 38.3% Marion 43.1 33.3 50.0 56.1State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
10
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Marion 35.8 25.7 42.1 47.5 Marion 54.6% 81.6% 44.0% 45.1%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend350
280
210
140
70
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Marion 19.6 20.9 18.5 21.4 Marion 58 70 62 59State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 5 - 5
Jury Management Indices Report Sumter County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d70
60
50
40
30
20
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Sumter 30.4% 27.0% 27.0% 33.4% Sumter 36.4 48.2 55.3 84.0State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
10
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Sumter 28.5 42.6 49.5 72.3 Sumter 61.4% 46.0% 36.0% 23.5%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Sumter 17.5 19.6 17.8 17.0 Sumter 8 5 6 3State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
10
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 5 - 6
Jury Management Indices Report Sixth Judicial Circuit
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
y
70
60
50
40
30
20
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Sixth Circuit 43.3% 42.5% 44.7% 45.3% Sixth Circuit 56.7 55.2 52.5 55.8Circuit Median 40.3% 40.2% 41.4% 41.4% Circuit Median 54.8 53.0 52.9 57.4
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
0
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
05 06 06 07 07 08 08 09 09 10
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Sixth Circuit 48.4 47.5 45.1 46.7 Sixth Circuit 61.5% 57.0% 63.2% 61.3%Circuit Median 44.3 41.0 44.0 45.4 Circuit Median 65.5% 67.2% 64.0% 66.1%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend800
720
640
560
480
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Sixth Circuit 29.8 27.0 28.5 28.6 Sixth Circuit 172 165 155 176Circuit Median 29 0 27 7 28 4 28 6 Circuit Median 132 125 122 122
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
400
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
29.0 27.7 28.4 28.6 132 125 122 122
Legend:
Circuit Median Circuit Median
Circuit Circuit Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed by OSCA staff.
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 6 - 1
Jury Management Indices Report Pasco County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d70
60
50
40
30
20
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Pasco 44.0% 40.8% 44.4% 46.1% Pasco 70.9 61.1 54.9 67.7State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
10
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Pasco 60.7 52.2 44.2 55.7 Pasco 43.7% 46.0% 58.1% 47.8%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend300
240
180
120
60
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Pasco 26.5 24.0 25.7 26.7 Pasco 39 40 42 35State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 6 - 2
Jury Management Indices Report Pinellas County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d70
60
50
40
30
20
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Pinellas 42.8% 43.3% 44.9% 44.9% Pinellas 52.6 53.4 51.6 52.9State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
10
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Pinellas 44.8 46.0 45.5 44.5 Pinellas 68.5% 60.9% 65.0% 65.4%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend600500400300200100
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Pinellas 30.7 28.0 29.6 29.1 Pinellas 133 125 113 141State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 6 - 3
Jury Management Indices Report Seventh Judicial Circuit
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
y
70
60
50
40
30
20
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Seventh Circuit 43.4% 40.6% 42.7% 45.0% Seventh Circuit 58.7 46.8 61.3 57.1Circuit Median 40.3% 40.2% 41.4% 41.4% Circuit Median 54.8 53.0 52.9 57.4
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
0
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
05 06 06 07 07 08 08 09 09 10
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Seventh Circuit 44.2 36.1 47.1 45.0 Seventh Circuit 51.0% 57.6% 46.4% 48.0%Circuit Median 44.3 41.0 44.0 45.4 Circuit Median 65.5% 67.2% 64.0% 66.1%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend550
490
430
370
310
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Seventh Circuit 22.5 20.8 21.9 21.6 Seventh Circuit 62 74 63 73Circuit Median 29 0 27 7 28 4 28 6 Circuit Median 132 125 122 122
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
250
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
29.0 27.7 28.4 28.6 132 125 122 122
Legend:
Circuit Median Circuit Median
Circuit Circuit Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed by OSCA staff.
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 7 - 1
Jury Management Indices Report Flagler County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d80
70
60
50
40
30
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Flagler 28.4% 24.5% 29.9% 35.7% Flagler 63.6 33.0 167.3 28.9State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
10
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Flagler 39.8 25.3 107.0 21.5 Flagler 64.8% 77.7% 29.0% 65.0%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Flagler 25.8 19.6 31.0 14.0 Flagler 5 8 3 17State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
10
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 7 - 2
Jury Management Indices Report Putnam County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d70
60
50
40
30
20
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Putnam 37.3% 30.8% 29.7% 33.4% Putnam 53.9 45.7 55.6 59.6State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
10
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Putnam 47.1 34.1 42.3 55.2 Putnam 38.4% 59.8% 46.5% 36.6%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Putnam 18.1 20.4 19.6 20.2 Putnam 12 13 11 11State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
10
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 7 - 3
Jury Management Indices Report St. Johns County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d70
60
50
40
30
20
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011St. Johns 39.4% 45.1% 45.4% 47.7% St. Johns 48.8 30.9 42.7 38.3State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
10
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011St. Johns 28.9 19.8 35.2 29.0 St. Johns 69.2% 72.2% 47.4% 54.2%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011St. Johns 20.0 14.3 16.7 15.7 St. Johns 10 10 6 7State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
10
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 7 - 4
Jury Management Indices Report Volusia County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d60
50
40
30
20
10
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Volusia 46.3% 43.9% 46.5% 48.3% Volusia 62.4 53.3 58.0 72.4State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
10
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Volusia 48.2 42.5 45.9 55.5 Volusia 50.5% 53.2% 49.1% 47.7%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend350
280
210
140
70
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Volusia 24.3 22.6 22.5 26.5 Volusia 35 43 43 38State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 7 - 5
Jury Management Indices Report Eighth Judicial Circuit
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
y
70
60
50
40
30
20
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Eighth Circuit 36.6% 39.8% 37.0% 39.0% Eighth Circuit 55.2 41.2 53.4 42.8Circuit Median 40.3% 40.2% 41.4% 41.4% Circuit Median 54.8 53.0 52.9 57.4
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
0
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
05 06 06 07 07 08 08 09 09 10
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Eighth Circuit 41.3 32.3 38.6 32.5 Eighth Circuit 78.3% 85.9% 73.3% 88.1%Circuit Median 44.3 41.0 44.0 45.4 Circuit Median 65.5% 67.2% 64.0% 66.1%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend600
500
400
300
200
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Eighth Circuit 32.4 27.8 28.3 28.6 Eighth Circuit 58 44 52 70Circuit Median 29 0 27 7 28 4 28 6 Circuit Median 132 125 122 122
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
100
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
29.0 27.7 28.4 28.6 132 125 122 122
Legend:
Circuit Median Circuit Median
Circuit Circuit Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed by OSCA staff.
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 8 - 1
Jury Management Indices Report Alachua County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d60
50
40
30
20
10
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Alachua 37.3% 40.3% 39.3% 40.7% Alachua 54.1 39.2 48.8 41.3State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
10
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Alachua 38.4 29.3 35.9 30.1 Alachua 86.8% 94.5% 88.6% 93.8%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend200
160
120
80
40
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Alachua 33.4 27.7 31.8 28.2 Alachua 44 36 35 58State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 8 - 2
Jury Management Indices Report Baker County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d100
80
60
40
20
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Baker 50.0% 25.5% 29.8% 20.3% Baker 36.0 17.0 38.7 35.5State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend100
80
60
40
20
0
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Baker 36.0 17.0 30.7 35.5 Baker 100.0% 100.0% 60.9% 78.9%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend605040302010
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Baker 36.0 17.0 18.7 28.0 Baker 1 3 3 2State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 8 - 3
Jury Management Indices Report Bradford County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d150
120
90
60
30
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Bradford 34.4% 47.2% 42.4% 44.5% Bradford 156.5 48.5 67.3 0.0State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend150
120
90
60
30
0
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Bradford 146.0 42.0 57.8 0.0 Bradford 94.2% 90.5% 96.1% 0.0%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend100
80
60
40
20
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend605040302010
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Bradford 137.5 38.0 55.5 0.0 Bradford 2 2 4 0State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 8 - 4
Jury Management Indices Report Gilchrist County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d12010080604020
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Gilchrist 0.0% 36.8% 0.0% 0.0% Gilchrist 0.0 53.0 0.0 0.0State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend110
90
70
50
30
10
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Gilchrist 0.0 46.0 0.0 0.0 Gilchrist 0.0% 39.1% 0.0% 0.0%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend605040302010
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Gilchrist 0.0 18.0 0.0 0.0 Gilchrist 0 2 0 0State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 8 - 5
Jury Management Indices Report Levy County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d70
60
50
40
30
20
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Levy 32.9% 34.7% 27.2% 35.3% Levy 51.4 147.0 68.4 47.6State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
10
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Levy 42.1 140.0 42.9 40.6 Levy 17.2% 44.3% 18.9% 76.8%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Levy 7.3 62.0 8.1 31.2 Levy 8 1 10 10State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
10
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 8 - 6
Jury Management Indices Report Union County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d200
150
100
50
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Union 33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Union 20.3 0.0 0.0 0.0State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend150
120
90
60
30
0
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Union 13.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 Union 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend605040302010
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Union 13.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 Union 3 0 0 0State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 8 - 7
Jury Management Indices Report Ninth Judicial Circuit
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
y
70
60
50
40
30
20
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Ninth Circuit 44.6% 47.0% 48.5% 47.9% Ninth Circuit 39.5 44.4 49.4 42.9Circuit Median 40.3% 40.2% 41.4% 41.4% Circuit Median 54.8 53.0 52.9 57.4
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
0
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
05 06 06 07 07 08 08 09 09 10
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Ninth Circuit 34.1 39.3 42.9 37.3 Ninth Circuit 68.9% 61.5% 57.6% 66.8%Circuit Median 44.3 41.0 44.0 45.4 Circuit Median 65.5% 67.2% 64.0% 66.1%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend1,500
1,200
900
600
300
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Ninth Circuit 23.5 24.1 24.7 24.9 Ninth Circuit 349 268 239 336Circuit Median 29 0 27 7 28 4 28 6 Circuit Median 132 125 122 122
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
29.0 27.7 28.4 28.6 132 125 122 122
Legend:
Circuit Median Circuit Median
Circuit Circuit Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed by OSCA staff.
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 9 - 1
Jury Management Indices Report Orange County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d60
50
40
30
20
10
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Orange 46.0% 50.0% 51.0% 49.1% Orange 38.0 41.9 48.8 41.5State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
10
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Orange 32.2 36.6 42.0 36.0 Orange 74.3% 67.8% 61.1% 71.8%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend1500
1200
900
600
300
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Orange 23.9 24.8 25.7 25.9 Orange 277 212 189 269State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 9 - 2
Jury Management Indices Report Osceola County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d70
60
50
40
30
20
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Osceola 39.1% 34.6% 38.1% 43.0% Osceola 45.2 53.5 51.6 48.4State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
10
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Osceola 41.6 49.4 46.4 42.5 Osceola 52.7% 43.8% 45.5% 49.8%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend300
240
180
120
60
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Osceola 21.9 21.6 21.1 21.1 Osceola 72 56 50 67State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 9 - 3
Jury Management Indices Report Tenth Judicial Circuit
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
y
70
60
50
40
30
20
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Tenth Circuit 41.7% 41.1% 40.8% 40.9% Tenth Circuit 49.8 58.3 75.0 64.4Circuit Median 40.3% 40.2% 41.4% 41.4% Circuit Median 54.8 53.0 52.9 57.4
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
0
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
05 06 06 07 07 08 08 09 09 10
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Tenth Circuit 34.8 42.2 49.4 42.0 Tenth Circuit 89.9% 79.3% 78.0% 83.2%Circuit Median 44.3 41.0 44.0 45.4 Circuit Median 65.5% 67.2% 64.0% 66.1%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend800
700
600
500
400
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Tenth Circuit 31.2 33.4 38.6 35.0 Tenth Circuit 87 81 58 91Circuit Median 29 0 27 7 28 4 28 6 Circuit Median 132 125 122 122
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
300
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
29.0 27.7 28.4 28.6 132 125 122 122
Legend:
Circuit Median Circuit Median
Circuit Circuit Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed by OSCA staff.
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 10 - 1
Jury Management Indices Report Hardee County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d225
185
145
105
65
25
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Hardee 48.6% 69.2% 71.9% 41.8% Hardee 0.0 60.0 0.0 41.5State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend200
160
120
80
40
0
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Hardee 0.0 53.0 0.0 34.5 Hardee 0.0% 13.2% 0.0% 20.3%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend605040302010
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Hardee 0.0 7.0 0.0 7.0 Hardee 0 1 0 2State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 10 - 2
Jury Management Indices Report Highlands County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d60
50
40
30
20
10
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Highlands 19.1% 14.7% 15.2% 14.9% Highlands 41.1 30.9 27.3 22.6State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
10
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Highlands 21.0 20.4 16.4 12.1 Highlands 102.7% 76.2% 115.5% 117.2%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Highlands 21.6 15.6 19.0 14.2 Highlands 7 7 9 12State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
10
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 10 - 3
Jury Management Indices Report Polk County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d70
60
50
40
30
20
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Polk 43.1% 42.3% 42.2% 42.3% Polk 49.4 60.9 83.3 71.5State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
10
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Polk 34.9 44.1 55.0 46.9 Polk 92.1% 80.5% 76.6% 83.1%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend600500400300200100
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Polk 32.1 35.5 42.1 38.9 Polk 80 73 49 77State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 10 - 4
Jury Management Indices Report Eleventh Judicial Circuit
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
y
80
70
60
50
40
30
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Eleventh Circuit 39.1% 38.0% 37.3% 36.1% Eleventh Circuit 70.2 77.8 64.9 64.2Circuit Median 40.3% 40.2% 41.4% 41.4% Circuit Median 54.8 53.0 52.9 57.4
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
10
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
05 06 06 07 07 08 08 09 09 10
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Eleventh Circuit 54.7 62.6 50.0 50.2 Eleventh Circuit 73.0% 65.9% 78.5% 77.8%Circuit Median 44.3 41.0 44.0 45.4 Circuit Median 65.5% 67.2% 64.0% 66.1%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend1,300
1,100
900
700
500
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Eleventh Circuit 39.9 41.2 39.2 39.0 Eleventh Circuit 282 225 240 306Circuit Median 29 0 27 7 28 4 28 6 Circuit Median 132 125 122 122
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
300
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
29.0 27.7 28.4 28.6 132 125 122 122
Legend:
Circuit Median Circuit Median
Circuit Circuit Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed by OSCA staff.
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 11 - 1
Jury Management Indices Report Dade County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d80
70
60
50
40
30
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Dade 39.1% 38.0% 37.3% 36.1% Dade 70.2 77.8 64.9 64.2State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
10
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Dade 54.7 62.6 50.0 50.2 Dade 73.0% 65.9% 78.5% 77.8%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend1,2001,000
800600400200
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Dade 39.9 41.2 39.2 39.0 Dade 282 225 240 306State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 11 - 2
Jury Management Indices Report Twelfth Judicial Circuit
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
y
70
60
50
40
30
20
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Twelfth Circuit 36.0% 33.2% 39.6% 37.6% Twelfth Circuit 64.5 76.3 68.1 67.1Circuit Median 40.3% 40.2% 41.4% 41.4% Circuit Median 54.8 53.0 52.9 57.4
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
0
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
05 06 06 07 07 08 08 09 09 10
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Twelfth Circuit 48.2 58.3 54.2 51.5 Twelfth Circuit 65.1% 56.8% 62.1% 62.2%Circuit Median 44.3 41.0 44.0 45.4 Circuit Median 65.5% 67.2% 64.0% 66.1%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend550
500
450
400
350
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Twelfth Circuit 31.4 33.1 33.6 32.0 Twelfth Circuit 89 68 74 97Circuit Median 29 0 27 7 28 4 28 6 Circuit Median 132 125 122 122
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
300
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
29.0 27.7 28.4 28.6 132 125 122 122
Legend:
Circuit Median Circuit Median
Circuit Circuit Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed by OSCA staff.
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 12 - 1
Jury Management Indices Report Desoto County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d80
70
60
50
40
30
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Desoto 18.5% 12.9% 18.4% 17.8% Desoto 24.8 52.0 113.7 79.0State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend100
80
60
40
20
0
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Desoto 19.8 45.0 84.7 72.0 Desoto 69.6% 100.0% 49.2% 58.8%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend605040302010
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Desoto 13.8 45.0 41.7 42.3 Desoto 8 1 3 3State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 12 - 2
Jury Management Indices Report Manatee County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d80
70
60
50
40
30
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Manatee 41.7% 39.9% 45.5% 45.7% Manatee 85.4 85.2 65.1 49.7State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
10
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Manatee 61.2 56.8 50.5 40.5 Manatee 59.6% 63.5% 65.2% 71.6%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend250
200
150
100
50
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Manatee 36.4 36.1 32.9 29.0 Manatee 34 32 35 55State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 12 - 3
Jury Management Indices Report Sarasota County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d70
60
50
40
30
20
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Sarasota 33.8% 30.0% 37.7% 34.8% Sarasota 56.2 68.9 67.2 90.8State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
10
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Sarasota 43.6 60.1 55.2 65.5 Sarasota 70.4% 50.0% 60.9% 54.3%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend300
240
180
120
60
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Sarasota 30.7 30.1 33.6 35.6 Sarasota 47 35 36 39State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 12 - 4
Jury Management Indices Report Thirteenth Judicial Circuit
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
y
70
60
50
40
30
20
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Thirteenth Circuit 22.5% 22.3% 22.8% 23.1% Thirteenth Circuit 46.9 48.8 42.1 50.0Circuit Median 40.3% 40.2% 41.4% 41.4% Circuit Median 54.8 53.0 52.9 57.4
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
0
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
05 06 06 07 07 08 08 09 09 10
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Thirteenth Circuit 35.3 36.6 29.9 34.8 Thirteenth Circuit 82.4% 78.2% 85.4% 82.9%Circuit Median 44.3 41.0 44.0 45.4 Circuit Median 65.5% 67.2% 64.0% 66.1%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend800
700
600
500
400
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Thirteenth Circuit 29.1 28.6 25.5 28.9 Thirteenth Circuit 138 134 150 147Circuit Median 29 0 27 7 28 4 28 6 Circuit Median 132 125 122 122
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
300
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
29.0 27.7 28.4 28.6 132 125 122 122
Legend:
Circuit Median Circuit Median
Circuit Circuit Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed by OSCA staff.
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 13 - 1
Jury Management Indices Report Hillsborough County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d70
60
50
40
30
20
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Hillsborough 22.5% 22.3% 22.8% 23.1% Hillsborough 46.9 48.8 42.1 50.0State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
10
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Hillsborough 35.3 36.6 29.9 34.8 Hillsborough 82.4% 78.2% 85.4% 82.9%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend1000
800
600
400
200
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Hillsborough 29.1 28.6 25.5 28.9 Hillsborough 138 134 150 147State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 13 - 2
Jury Management Indices Report Fourteenth Judicial Circuit
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
y
70
60
50
40
30
20
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Fourteenth Circuit 39.1% 36.8% 38.2% 37.9% Fourteenth Circuit 53.7 68.8 48.5 55.5Circuit Median 40.3% 40.2% 41.4% 41.4% Circuit Median 54.8 53.0 52.9 57.4
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
0
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
05 06 06 07 07 08 08 09 09 10
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Fourteenth Circuit 44.4 55.8 38.8 45.9 Fourteenth Circuit 23.5% 24.0% 24.8% 20.4%Circuit Median 44.3 41.0 44.0 45.4 Circuit Median 65.5% 67.2% 64.0% 66.1%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend600
500
400
300
200
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Fourteenth Circuit 10.4 13.4 9.6 9.4 Fourteenth Circuit 31 24 32 34Circuit Median 29 0 27 7 28 4 28 6 Circuit Median 132 125 122 122
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
100
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
29.0 27.7 28.4 28.6 132 125 122 122
Legend:
Circuit Median Circuit Median
Circuit Circuit Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed by OSCA staff.
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 14 - 1
Jury Management Indices Report Bay County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d70
60
50
40
30
20
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Bay 38.9% 35.0% 38.3% 35.2% Bay 42.9 63.0 43.2 54.5State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
10
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Bay 34.9 46.1 32.4 43.6 Bay 20.4% 22.3% 22.3% 16.2%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend150
120
90
60
30
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Bay 7.1 10.3 7.2 7.1 Bay 25 17 26 25State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 14 - 2
Jury Management Indices Report Calhoun County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d150
120
90
60
30
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Calhoun 40.5% 0.0% 0.0% 37.3% Calhoun 109.0 0.0 0.0 56.0State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend150
120
90
60
30
0
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Calhoun 81.0 0.0 0.0 56.0 Calhoun 25.9% 0.0% 0.0% 37.5%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend605040302010
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Calhoun 21.0 0.0 0.0 21.0 Calhoun 1 0 0 2State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 14 - 3
Jury Management Indices Report Gulf County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d70
60
50
40
30
20
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Gulf 50.0% 44.8% 55.8% 59.5% Gulf 51.7 25.0 39.5 41.5State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
10
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Gulf 36.7 21.5 36.5 35.0 Gulf 100.0% 100.0% 89.0% 61.4%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Gulf 36.7 21.5 32.5 21.5 Gulf 3 2 2 2State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
10
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 14 - 4
Jury Management Indices Report Holmes County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d70
60
50
40
30
20
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Holmes 26.1% 30.0% 23.8% 46.5% Holmes 0.0 26.0 51.0 27.0State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend150
120
90
60
30
0
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Holmes 0.0 22.5 47.5 27.0 Holmes 0.0% 91.1% 44.2% 77.8%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend605040302010
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Holmes 0.0 20.5 21.0 21.0 Holmes 0 2 2 1State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 14 - 5
Jury Management Indices Report Jackson County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d70
60
50
40
30
20
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Jackson 39.3% 37.7% 42.7% 32.2% Jackson 87.5 0.0 142.0 39.8State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
10
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Jackson 80.5 0.0 128.0 29.0 Jackson 8.7% 0.0% 5.5% 31.0%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Jackson 7.0 0.0 7.0 9.0 Jackson 2 0 1State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
10
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 14 - 6
4
Jury Management Indices Report Washington County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d70
60
50
40
30
20
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Washington 39.3% 42.4% 30.0% 38.4% Washington 0.0 115.0 105.0 0.0State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend100
80
60
40
20
0
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend110%
90%
70%
50%
30%
10%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Washington 0.0 112.3 105.0 0.0 Washington 0.0% 18.7% 5.7% 0.0%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Washington 0.0 21.0 6.0 0.0 Washington 0 3 1 0State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 14 - 7
Jury Management Indices Report Fifteenth Judicial Circuit
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
y
70
60
50
40
30
20
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Fifteenth Circuit 33.3% 33.9% 33.4% 33.2% Fifteenth Circuit 58.1 63.1 58.7 62.1Circuit Median 40.3% 40.2% 41.4% 41.4% Circuit Median 54.8 53.0 52.9 57.4
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
0
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
05 06 06 07 07 08 08 09 09 10
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Fifteenth Circuit 46.5 49.3 46.2 47.7 Fifteenth Circuit 74.3% 73.1% 68.2% 71.8%Circuit Median 44.3 41.0 44.0 45.4 Circuit Median 65.5% 67.2% 64.0% 66.1%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend1,000
900800700600500
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Fifteenth Circuit 34.5 36.0 31.5 34.3 Fifteenth Circuit 242 207 197 237Circuit Median 29 0 27 7 28 4 28 6 Circuit Median 132 125 122 122
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
400
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
29.0 27.7 28.4 28.6 132 125 122 122
Legend:
Circuit Median Circuit Median
Circuit Circuit Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed by OSCA staff.
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 15 - 1
Jury Management Indices Report Palm Beach County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d70
60
50
40
30
20
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Palm Beach 33.3% 33.9% 33.4% 33.2% Palm Beach 58.1 63.1 58.7 62.1State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
10
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Palm Beach 46.5 49.3 46.2 47.7 Palm Beach 74.3% 73.1% 68.2% 71.8%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend1,000
800
600
400
200
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Palm Beach 34.5 36.0 31.5 34.3 Palm Beach 242 207 197 237State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 15 - 2
Jury Management Indices Report Sixteenth Judicial Circuit
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
y
70
60
50
40
30
20
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Sixteenth Circuit 58.3% 60.9% 64.9% 64.2% Sixteenth Circuit 68.4 72.0 42.0 45.6Circuit Median 40.3% 40.2% 41.4% 41.4% Circuit Median 54.8 53.0 52.9 57.4
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
10
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
05 06 06 07 07 08 08 09 09 10
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Sixteenth Circuit 57.5 55.9 33.0 38.4 Sixteenth Circuit 53.0% 44.7% 56.5% 51.3%Circuit Median 44.3 41.0 44.0 45.4 Circuit Median 65.5% 67.2% 64.0% 66.1%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend1,000
800
600
400
200
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Sixteenth Circuit 30.5 25.0 18.6 19.7 Sixteenth Circuit 17 22 32 30Circuit Median 29 0 27 7 28 4 28 6 Circuit Median 132 125 122 122
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
29.0 27.7 28.4 28.6 132 125 122 122
Legend:
Circuit Median Circuit Median
Circuit Circuit Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed by OSCA staff.
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 16 - 1
Jury Management Indices Report Monroe County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d70
60
50
40
30
20
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Monroe 58.3% 60.9% 64.9% 64.2% Monroe 68.4 72.0 42.0 45.6State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
10
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Monroe 57.5 55.9 33.0 38.4 Monroe 53.0% 44.7% 56.5% 51.3%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend200
160
120
80
40
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Monroe 30.5 25.0 18.6 19.7 Monroe 17 22 32 30State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 16 - 2
Jury Management Indices Report Seventeenth Judicial Circuit
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
y
70
60
50
40
30
20
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Seventeenth Circuit 42.1% 38.8% 42.0% 42.6% Seventeenth Circuit 73.5 76.8 88.5 72.1Circuit Median 40.3% 40.2% 41.4% 41.4% Circuit Median 54.8 53.0 52.9 57.4
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
10
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend150%
120%
90%
60%
30%
0%
05 06 06 07 07 08 08 09 09 10
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Seventeenth Circuit 59.9 61.0 68.4 58.0 Seventeenth Circuit 44.2% 46.8% 45.2% 49.0%Circuit Median 44.3 41.0 44.0 45.4 Circuit Median 65.5% 67.2% 64.0% 66.1%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend1,800
1,500
1,200
900
600
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Seventeenth Circuit 26.5 28.5 30.9 28.5 Seventeenth Circuit 231 208 166 250Circuit Median 29 0 27 7 28 4 28 6 Circuit Median 132 125 122 122
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
300
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
29.0 27.7 28.4 28.6 132 125 122 122
Legend:
Circuit Median Circuit Median
Circuit Circuit Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed by OSCA staff.
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 17 - 1
Jury Management Indices Report Broward County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d70
60
50
40
30
20
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Broward 42.1% 38.8% 42.0% 42.6% Broward 73.5 76.8 88.5 72.1State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
10
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Broward 59.9 61.0 68.4 58.0 Broward 44.2% 46.8% 45.2% 49.0%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend2,000
1,600
1,200
800
400
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Broward 26.5 28.5 30.9 28.5 Broward 231 208 166 250State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 17 - 2
Jury Management Indices Report Eighteenth Judicial Circuit
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
y
70
60
50
40
30
20
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Eighteenth Circuit 39.9% 42.3% 42.7% 48.7% Eighteenth Circuit 52.2 48.0 51.9 62.2Circuit Median 40.3% 40.2% 41.4% 41.4% Circuit Median 54.8 53.0 52.9 57.4
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
0
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
05 06 06 07 07 08 08 09 09 10
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Eighteenth Circuit 41.1 39.8 42.8 53.9 Eighteenth Circuit 59.5% 64.8% 59.5% 65.5%Circuit Median 44.3 41.0 44.0 45.4 Circuit Median 65.5% 67.2% 64.0% 66.1%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend800
700
600
500
400
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Eighteenth Circuit 24.4 25.7 25.5 35.3 Eighteenth Circuit 188 180 146 148Circuit Median 29 0 27 7 28 4 28 6 Circuit Median 132 125 122 122
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
300
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
29.0 27.7 28.4 28.6 132 125 122 122
Legend:
Circuit Median Circuit Median
Circuit Circuit Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed by OSCA staff.
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 18 - 1
Jury Management Indices Report Brevard County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d80
70
60
50
40
30
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Brevard 33.7% 35.2% 35.6% 46.5% Brevard 61.9 56.6 59.4 76.7State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
10
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Brevard 49.6 47.7 49.2 69.0 Brevard 48.2% 55.3% 51.7% 63.9%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend500
400
300
200
100
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Brevard 23.9 26.4 25.4 44.1 Brevard 109 106 88 77State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 18 - 2
Jury Management Indices Report Seminole County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d70
60
50
40
30
20
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Seminole 53.2% 57.0% 56.1% 53.5% Seminole 38.8 35.6 40.6 46.5State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
10
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Seminole 29.3 28.3 33.0 37.5 Seminole 85.9% 87.6% 77.1% 68.6%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend350
280
210
140
70
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Seminole 25.2 24.8 25.5 25.7 Seminole 79 74 58 71State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 18 - 3
Jury Management Indices Report Nineteenth Judicial Circuit
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
y
70
60
50
40
30
20
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Nineteenth Circuit 42.0% 43.2% 44.9% 50.0% Nineteenth Circuit 69.2 57.7 64.5 69.2Circuit Median 40.3% 40.2% 41.4% 41.4% Circuit Median 54.8 53.0 52.9 57.4
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
10
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
05 06 06 07 07 08 08 09 09 10
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Nineteenth Circuit 56.1 48.6 54.3 57.6 Nineteenth Circuit 66.0% 68.6% 64.8% 62.6%Circuit Median 44.3 41.0 44.0 45.4 Circuit Median 65.5% 67.2% 64.0% 66.1%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend550
500
450
400
350
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Nineteenth Circuit 37.0 33.3 35.2 36.0 Nineteenth Circuit 85 81 68 81Circuit Median 29 0 27 7 28 4 28 6 Circuit Median 132 125 122 122
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
300
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
29.0 27.7 28.4 28.6 132 125 122 122
Legend:
Circuit Median Circuit Median
Circuit Circuit Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed by OSCA staff.
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 19 - 1
Jury Management Indices Report Indian River County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d60
50
40
30
20
10
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Indian River 59.2% 56.8% 58.1% 63.1% Indian River 79.0 38.5 56.4 45.0State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
10
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Indian River 51.5 30.0 41.4 35.1 Indian River 75.0% 70.9% 58.3% 74.9%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend180150120
906030
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Indian River 38.6 21.3 24.2 26.3 Indian River 24 32 23 21State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 19 - 2
Jury Management Indices Report Martin County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d100
80
60
40
20
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Martin 36.5% 35.9% 40.1% 37.2% Martin 87.3 86.9 57.7 83.8State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend100
80
60
40
20
0
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Martin 64.6 64.7 46.0 63.9 Martin 63.0% 48.5% 72.2% 61.7%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend908070605040
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Martin 40.7 31.4 33.2 39.4 Martin 15 11 14 14State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
30
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 19 - 3
Jury Management Indices Report Okeechobee County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d100
80
60
40
20
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Okeechobee 24.9% 25.5% 28.8% 33.1% Okeechobee 48.3 110.2 58.7 49.5State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend100
80
60
40
20
0
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Okeechobee 39.4 73.8 46.5 41.3 Okeechobee 107.2% 100.0% 104.9% 104.8%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Okeechobee 42.2 73.8 48.8 43.3 Okeechobee 13 5 10 14State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
10
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
10
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 19 - 4
Jury Management Indices Report St. Lucie County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d80
70
60
50
40
30
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011St. Lucie 38.5% 42.8% 42.9% 54.3% St. Lucie 62.2 58.6 80.8 87.3State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
10
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011St. Lucie 62.2 57.3 77.8 76.6 St. Lucie 51.7% 68.8% 54.3% 49.3%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend250
200
150
100
50
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011St. Lucie 32.1 39.5 42.2 37.8 St. Lucie 33 33 21 32State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 19 - 5
Jury Management Indices Report Twentieth Judicial Circuit
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
y
80
70
60
50
40
30
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Twentieth Circuit 57.5% 57.0% 58.6% 58.0% Twentieth Circuit 69.1 65.8 69.8 74.1Circuit Median 40.3% 40.2% 41.4% 41.4% Circuit Median 54.8 53.0 52.9 57.4
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend70605040302010
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
05 06 06 07 07 08 08 09 09 10
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Twentieth Circuit 63.8 61.7 62.4 67.9 Twentieth Circuit 44.1% 45.2% 47.4% 41.2%Circuit Median 44.3 41.0 44.0 45.4 Circuit Median 65.5% 67.2% 64.0% 66.1%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend800
700
600
500
400
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Twentieth Circuit 28.1 27.9 29.6 27.9 Twentieth Circuit 138 131 127 139Circuit Median 29 0 27 7 28 4 28 6 Circuit Median 132 125 122 122
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
300
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
29.0 27.7 28.4 28.6 132 125 122 122
Legend:
Circuit Median Circuit Median
Circuit Circuit Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed by OSCA staff.
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 20 - 1
Jury Management Indices Report Charlotte County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d60
50
40
30
20
10
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Charlotte 60.4% 61.0% 64.6% 65.6% Charlotte 44.2 30.1 41.8 32.8State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
10
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Charlotte 37.6 27.8 36.3 29.8 Charlotte 100.0% 100.0% 95.9% 86.9%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend150
120
90
60
30
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Charlotte 37.6 27.8 34.8 25.9 Charlotte 19 23 19 30State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 20 - 2
Jury Management Indices Report Collier County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d100
80
60
40
20
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Collier 72.7% 72.3% 59.5% 60.5% Collier 87.4 108.9 100.2 116.2State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend100
80
60
40
20
0
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Collier 81.9 103.7 92.0 104.9 Collier 22.4% 23.2% 24.6% 23.3%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend400
320
240
160
80
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Collier 18.3 24.1 22.6 24.5 Collier 32 20 24 26State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 20 - 3
Jury Management Indices Report Glades County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d400
320
240
160
80
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Glades 23.0% 20.6% 23.5% 19.1% Glades 85.0 0.0 105.0 55.0State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend400
320
240
160
80
0
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Glades 77.3 0.0 97.0 50.3 Glades 25.9% 0.0% 24.7% 49.7%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend605040302010
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Glades 20.0 0.0 24.0 25.0 Glades 3 0 2 6State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 20 - 4
Jury Management Indices Report Hendry County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d70
60
50
40
30
20
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Hendry 65.3% 74.8% 81.5% 77.7% Hendry 49.9 50.6 33.2 48.5State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend70605040302010
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Hendry 49.9 50.6 33.2 48.5 Hendry 75.0% 58.8% 68.6% 53.9%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend60
50
40
30
20
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Hendry 37.5 29.8 22.8 26.1 Hendry 13 8 14 8State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
10
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 20 - 5
Jury Management Indices Report Lee County
Summoning Yield - 5 Year Trend Juror Days Per Trial - 5 Year Trend70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Ju o ys e 5 e e d70
60
50
40
30
20
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10
Fiscal Year
Summoning Yield - Quarterly Data Juror Days Per Trial - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly JDPT Summoning Yield 2010 2010 2010 2011 2010 2010 2010 2011Lee 49.2% 46.3% 51.7% 52.5% Lee 70.5 65.9 73.5 80.8State Median 38.5% 38.0% 39.2% 39.4% State Median 51.7 48.8 54.9 50.2
Fiscal Year
People Brought In Per Trial - 5 Year Trend70605040302010
Percent to Voir Dire - 5 Year Trend120%
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
People Brought In Per Trial - Quarterly Data Percent to Voir Dire - Quarterly DataApr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly PBI
2010 2010 2010 2011 Percent to Voir Dire 2010 2010 2010 2011Lee 64.7 61.2 64.3 74.2 Lee 44.3% 46.9% 50.1% 41.2%State Median 42.1 45.0 45.9 41.3 State Median 69.2% 60.9% 54.3% 59.6%
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
Average Panel Size - 5 Year Trend50
40
30
20
10
Number of Trials - 5 Year Trend350
280
210
140
70
Average Panel Size - Quarterly Data Number of Trials (6 + 12 Person) - Quarterly DataQuarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Quarterly Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Average Panel Size 2010 2010 2010 2011 (6 + 12 Person) 2010 2010 2010 2011Lee 28.6 28.7 32.2 30.6 Lee 71 80 68 69State Median 26 5 25 0 24 3 25 9 State Median 12 11 10 14
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
0
05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10Fiscal Year
26.5 25.0 24.3 25.9 12 11 10 14
Legend:
State Median State Median
County State Median Standard
Note: Jury Management data is provided by the clerk of court for each county or the circuit court administrator. This data is self reported through the jury management reports, and the accuracy, validity, and reliability of this data can not be confirmed
Quarter Ending March 31, 2011 (Data as of May 23, 2011) 20 - 6
![The Importance of Jury Trials to a Democratic Society A presentation created by The National Judicial College Delivered by [Your Name Here]](https://static.fdocuments.us/doc/165x107/56649d745503460f94a53df8/the-importance-of-jury-trials-to-a-democratic-society-a-presentation-created.jpg)
