June 2011 Chancellors' Panel

29
1 1 Chancellors’ Panel June 17, 2011 Advancing Quality Undergraduate Education

description

Advancing Quality Undergraduate Education at the University of Missouri System

Transcript of June 2011 Chancellors' Panel

Page 1: June 2011 Chancellors' Panel

11

Chancellors’ PanelJune 17, 2011

Advancing Quality Undergraduate Education

Page 2: June 2011 Chancellors' Panel

22

Dr. Brady DeatonUniversity of Missouri-Columbia

Page 3: June 2011 Chancellors' Panel

3

AAU Public Change in Undergraduate Enrollment 2002-2009

Page 4: June 2011 Chancellors' Panel

4

• Increase in ethnic diversity African American up 53% (+715 students)Hispanic up 102% (+399 students)

• Increase in geographic diversityOut-of-state enrollment up 81% (+2,154 students)

• Increase in low-income studentsPell-eligible students up 61% (+1,809 students)

• Increase in high ability studentsACT Scores 33-36 up 192% since 2002 (+136 students)ACT Scores 28-32 up 30% since 2002 (+365 students)

• Six-year graduation rate – highest in MU history 69.3% (state 54.4% / national 53.5%)

Notable MU Undergraduate Enrollment TrendsFall 2002 — Fall 2010

Page 5: June 2011 Chancellors' Panel

5

Unmatched MU Education

• Summer Welcome orientation programPersonalized academic advising for each incoming student

• 100+ Freshman Interest GroupsStudents with similar interests live and study together

• Honors College• 12 major undergraduate research programs• Fellowships Office• Learning Center• Expanded/personalized academic advising

New assessment effort underway• Total Person Program for student-athletes• Service-Learning Office

3,800 undergraduates volunteered 160,00 hours through 250+ courses (2010-11 academic year)

Page 6: June 2011 Chancellors' Panel

6

Stellar MU Students

Kam Phillips

Jenna Marston

Matheus Souza

Jimmy Cole

Emily Spain and Blake Hanson

Page 7: June 2011 Chancellors' Panel

7

Prominent MU Faculty

James Birchler• Curators’ Professor of Biological Sciences

• Newly elected to the National Academy of Sciences

• Teaches “General Genetics” course to undergraduates

Page 8: June 2011 Chancellors' Panel

88

Leo E. MortonUniversity of Missouri-Kansas City

Page 9: June 2011 Chancellors' Panel

9

• Undergraduate enrollment growth is a strategic imperative• Currently 60% Undergraduate and 40% Graduate and Professional – Moving towards

70/30

• Student success (retention/graduation) ─ our first strategic goal enhances enrollment growth

• Targeting academic areas critical to community success• Engineering, Management , Arts & Sciences, Education, Biological Sciences

Success requires end-to-end collaboration

Undergraduate Education at UMKC

Page 10: June 2011 Chancellors' Panel

10

Quality Undergraduate Education

Ultimate student success requires:• Well prepared students • Effective higher education processes/environments• Clear performance outcomes, measures and accountability

How do we currently measure success?

Page 11: June 2011 Chancellors' Panel

11

Measuring Quality Undergraduate Education

Exit Measures

Accountability Measures:• Licensing Exams 2010 – Nursing (UMKC 94%, Natl.87%); Teacher

Education (UMKC 100%, Natl. 96%) • ETS Proficiency Profile – 66% of students above national average

Senior feedback:• Satisfaction with educational experience survey – FY11 – 80%• 75% rate “Quality of Instruction” as Good or Excellent

Other input:• Employer Survey• Alumni Survey

How do we currently enhance quality?

Page 12: June 2011 Chancellors' Panel

12

Support for Quality Undergraduate Experience

• Faculty Reviews• Low Student/Faculty Ratio (13:1)

• Classroom Size (54% - 20 or below)

• Program Reviews• SEARCH – Student Research• FACET – Faculty training• Campus Environment• Peer Mentoring• Supplemental Instruction• Early Warning System

• Internships• Community Service• Career Center• Clinical and Field

Experiences

Many efforts focused on improving outcomes

Page 13: June 2011 Chancellors' Panel

13

• Lumina Foundation – Degree Qualifications Profile

• Increasing community and corporate engagement

Improving Undergraduate Outcomes

• IUE – Urban Teachers• SWECC – Early College• Prep KC• Charter Schools• Principals Institute• Articulation

Agreements – CC’s• KC Stem Alliance• etc.

• Student Success Center• University College• Honors College• Transfer Center• Advising overhaul• Need-based Financial Aid• Access to Success (A2S)• P-20• NSF KC BANCS• Gen Ed overhaul

What are our challenges?

Page 14: June 2011 Chancellors' Panel

14

Challenges to Delivering Quality

Student preparedness• Lack of consistency in student preparation• Improving matriculation from community colleges• Increasing interest in STEM fields and early college credits• Need-based scholarships• Degree Qualification Profiles• Achieving scale with key initiatives (e.g. IUE)• Intervening early enough:

• 3rd grade reading – behind- never catch up• 5th grade reading results used to forecast need for prisons

Page 15: June 2011 Chancellors' Panel

1515

Dr. Tom George University of Missouri-St. Louis

Page 16: June 2011 Chancellors' Panel

16

Focus on students and faculty

UMSL is advancing undergraduate education by focusing on the teaching capacity of faculty, the overall student experience and the preparation of students entering college

Page 17: June 2011 Chancellors' Panel

17

Center for Teaching and Learning

Offers programs that improve undergraduate instruction across all disciplines

• Teaching with Technology series helps faculty understand and integrate technology that enhances instruction.

• Orientation and training sessions specifically for adjunct faculty and teaching assistants.

• Ongoing lectures and seminars on classroom issues.

Page 18: June 2011 Chancellors' Panel

18

Center for Teaching and Learning

Offers programs that help students take advantage of their experience at a metropolitan research university

• Undergraduate Research Symposium creates an opportunity for students to present their research or creative work accomplished in association with faculty mentors.

• Hundreds of service-learning assignments with the intent that the activity benefit and support the recipient and the student’s learning experience.

Page 19: June 2011 Chancellors' Panel

19

The Student Experience

University Studies course and New Student Orientation have been created to better acquaint UMSL students – many of whom are the first in their family to attend college – with the rigors necessary to succeed at a research university

• University Studies is a basic introduction to the university that covers the university's history, organization, culture, resources, research programs and accomplishments.

• NSO is a one-day mandatory program designed to provide students with the information and resources they will need to have a successful college experience.

Page 20: June 2011 Chancellors' Panel

20

The Student Experience

SisterScholars-in-Training and Males of Color Initiative have been started to enhance the performance of minority students in undergraduate courses

• The goal is to improve the retention and graduate rates of minorities on par with the larger student population.

• Both create a supportive environment that focuses on personal responsibility, meeting course deadlines, study habits, test taking and career goals.

Page 21: June 2011 Chancellors' Panel

21

The Student Experience

Career Services helps UMSL students select among more than 1,000 internships annually at the companies and organizations located throughout the St. Louis region

• Nearly 3,500 separate employers have posted an internship in Career Service’s database over the past four years.

• Career Services internships are separate from internships associated with degree programs such as education or nursing.

Page 22: June 2011 Chancellors' Panel

22

The Student Experience

The Math Technology Learning Center was created during the redesign of UMSL’s college algebra course under the guidance of the National Center for Academic Transformation

• Pass rates in college algebra have steadily increased during all phases of the redesign.

• Trigonometry, calculus and statistics students now all use the lab to do their on-line homework or to get assistance from instructors and teaching assistants.

Page 23: June 2011 Chancellors' Panel

23

Preparing future undergraduates

• UMSL operates programs reaching thousands of middle and high school students annually to better ensure that they have the academic capacity to succeed in college

• As a result, UMSL has recruited freshman classes with steadily improved class ranks and ACT scores.

• The Bridge Program and STARS are primary examples of UMSL’s precollegiate outreach.

Page 24: June 2011 Chancellors' Panel

2424

Dr. John F. Carney IIIMissouri University of Science and Technology

Page 25: June 2011 Chancellors' Panel

25

• Missouri S&T produces technological literate graduates:• 90% majoring in engineering/hard sciences • Provide engineers/scientists to Missouri industries

• Missouri S&T promotes interest in engineering and science starting in first grade

• Missouri S&T provides support structure to ensure undergraduate student success

Advancing Missouri

Page 26: June 2011 Chancellors' Panel

26

Missouri S&T Produces Technological Literate Graduates

• 15 engineering bachelor degree programs

• 668 employers recruited our students in FY11

• We keep engineering students in Missouri

Page 27: June 2011 Chancellors' Panel

27

Project Lead the Way

• Since 2005, Missouri S&T has been the state affiliate for Project Lead the Way

• In five years, S&T has trained more than 400 teachers in teaching Project Lead the Way curriculum (149 schools)

• S&T is the only university in the nation to offer Project Lead the Way training in both engineering and biomedical science

Page 28: June 2011 Chancellors' Panel

28

Missouri S&T Provides Support Structure to Ensure Undergraduate Student Success

• Hit the Ground Running

• Learning Enhancement Across Disciplines

• Freshman Student Intrusive Intervention Program

• On-Track Academic Success Program

Result: 86% Retention Rate

Page 29: June 2011 Chancellors' Panel

29

Obstacles/Challenges

• Student/faculty ratio

• Salaries of faculty and staff

• Infrastructure