July 6, 1993 Prepared for: Commander Atlantic Division ... · North Carolina - Department of...

Groundwater Technology Government k-vices. Inc. 1244 B Executive Boulevard. Suite 106. Chesapeake. I-;\ 23320

Tel: (804) 43tGi881 Fax (SW 13G-2312

THREE WELL SITE CHECK REPORT BUILDING FC-201, WEST SIDE

MARINE CORPS BASE, CAMP LEJEUNE, NC A&E CONTRACT NO: N62470-91-D-6652

JOB NO. 830011088.18

July 6, 1993

GROUNDWA--ER TECHNOLOGY GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC. Prepared by:

Prepared for: Commander

Atlantic Division Naval Facilities Engineering Command

Norfolk, Virginia 2351 l-6287

Lead Geologi t

GROUNDWATER TECHNOLOGY GOVERNMENT

Offices throughout the U.S., Canada and Overseas

GROUNDWATER m TECHNOLOGY 11 11 I/ 11 GOVERNMENTSERVICES

Groundwater Technology Government Services, Inc. 1244 B Executive Boulevard, Suite 106, Chesapeake, VA 23320

November 30, 1993 Tel: (804) 4367881 Fax: (804) 4362312

Job No. -830011088.18

Groundwater Section Division of Environmental Management North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources P.O. Box 27687 Raleigh, North Carolina 2761 l-7687

To Whom It May Concern:

I have enclosed completed well construction record forms for three groundwater monitoring wells for your records. These wells were installed March 31, 1993, on the west side of Building FC-201 located at Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune, North Carolina.

If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at (804) 436-7881.

Respectfully,

GROUNDWATER TECHNOLOGY GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC,

William L. Hughes Geologist

WLH/mlm

Enclosures

cc: D. Pickett, MCB, Camp Lejeune, NC File

Oitkcs throughout the U.S.. Canada and Overseas

North Carolina - Department of Environment, Health. and Natural Resources .I Division of Environmental Management - Groundwater Section

P.O. Box 29535 - Raleigh, N.C. 27626-0535 Phone (919) 733-3221

WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD

DRILLING CONTRACTOR: Gshbucne B;\\;vq

DRILLER REGISTRATION NUMBER: 0451 STATE WELL CONSTRUCTION LI~FLL TD hlo.

PERMIT NUMBER: “\/A FCZaLJ- 1

1. WELL LOCATION: (Show sketch of the location below) Nearest Town: -X&30~“~\\~ County: Onslfill

\n Ulcp. w. MP.6 PA 0 l.f tettne. Q IYQ 201 (Road, Co’mmunity, or Subdivision and Lot%.) J DEPTH

2. OWNER * - Us &a; &va\ Far,l\t,e E y-,ty n i CifiQ mm From To

ADDRESSCamma&na Genecal, Ah : (?&et or Route No.)

AC!5 t%bs 0 to 2oct. 20SGL-0002

Mand corps t3Asc: 3sc. &lx mYYl ; cam D l.e ieune. t&I , City or Town Slate ’ Zipeode

3. DATE DRILLED 31% ! 93 USE OF WELL Ma&)nfin(j 4. TOTAL DEPTH 04% 5. CUTTINGS COLLECT:D \;ESu NOM

de\\

6. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES 0 NOm 7. STATIC WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: FT. 6.3

8. TOP OF CASING IS 9 (Use *+” if Above Top of Casing) FT. Above Land Surface*

* Casing Terminated at/or below land surface is illegal unless a variance is issued in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C .0118

9. YIELD (gpm): .-.%I- METHOD OF TEST ‘IA

10. WATER ZONES (depth): b.3 4%. to totcA\ Lb-l-k

DRILLING LOG

Formation Description

Xu an brodn. I .

if&-Sra\he sAt4tI .J

\OOSP

11. CHLORINATION: Type tiIA 12. CASING:

Amount L If additional space is needed use back of form

Wall Thickness Depth Diameter Material

From 0 To -%- Ft. 2 in

or WeighVFt. Seh.W WC

From Top Ft.

From Top Ft.

13. GROUT:

Depth Material Method

From 0 -Ft. &.% 2

2 T: 3 fnen+

From ~ (3en+h+~ Ft. i&$-&d 14. SCREEN:

Depth Diameter Slot Size Material

From 5 ToaFt in. min. WC

From -To-..-- Ft.- in. __ in.

From -Top Ft.- in. ~ in.

15. SAND. GRAVEL PACK:

Depth Size Material

From 3 To 2o ~ Ft. do* 2 LxdD

From ~ To Ft.

LOCATION SKETCH

(Show direction and distance from at least two State

Roads, or other map reference points)

2

16. REMARKS:

I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS WELL WAS CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 15A NCAC 2C, WELL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, AND THAT A COPY OF THIS RECORD HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO THE WELL OWNER.

GW-I REV. 5~s; SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTOR OR AGENT / DATE Submit original to Division of Environmental Managemexand copy to well owner.

North Carolina - Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources Division of Environmental Management - Groundwater Section

P.O. 80x 29535 - Raleigh, N.C. 27626-0535 Phone (919) 733-3221


DRILLING CONTRACTOR: F%hbu,cne -ik\\;~\q STATE WE1

DRILLER REGISTRATION NUMBER: 0451 PERMIT NUMBER: %i Fczo\c3-z

3. 4. 5. 6. 7.

8.

WELL LOCATION: (Show sketch of the location below) Nearest Town: -xack3on”~\\e~ County: Oft51 OuI

DEPTH

From To

0 i-o 3G

DRILLING LOG Formation Description

Gcw M hcckm. , GinE-QCaid SJQJb.

City or TO&I State ’ Ziptode

DATE DRILLED- USEOF WELL mo nitb6 TOTAL DEPTH 70 4%.

fig L&2\\

CUl-flNGS COLLECTED YES m NOM DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES 0 NOR STATIC WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing: FT. 5.3

TOP OF CASING IS ,a (Use ‘+’ if Above Top of Casing) FT. Above Land Surface*

* Casing Terminated at/or below land surface is illegal unless a variance is issued in

9.

10.

accordance with 15A NCAC 2C .0118

YIELD (gpm): ql A METHOD OF TEST tiiA

WATER ZONES (depth): 5.3 4% to -I-&\ Jd-L

11. CHLORINATION: Type filA

12. CASING:

Amount * If additional space is needed use back of form

13.

14.

15.

Wall Thickness LOCATION SKETCH

0 Depth Diameter or Weight/Ft. Material

Ft. 2 in (Show direction and distance from at least two State

From To 5 Seh.W Fvc Roads, or other map reference points)

From To---- Ft. t4 From To- Ft. GROUT:

Depth Material Method From 0 To 2 -Ft. &men+ From ;? To 3 (3er+&+~ SCREEN:

Ft. ti$f&&

Depth Diameter Slot Size Material From 5 To 20 Ft 2 in. win. WI

From ~ To ___ Ft..---- ~ in. in. From ---To- Ft.---- in. ~ in. )y\A\d &Z\I\CE: x0.

SAND:GRAVEL PACK: Depth Size Material 1.5 males GJ.& of

16.

From REMARKS:

To Ft. a-d Main


GW-1 REV. 9.91 SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTOR OR AGENT Submit original to Division of Enviro

DATE

..!Jorth Carolina - Department of Environment, Health, and Natural Resources Division of Environmental Management - Groundwater Section

P.O. Box 29535 - Raleigh, N.C. 27626-0535 Phone (919) 733-3221

FOR OFFICE USE ONLY I.*., .:‘:i : s : : ,)y

QUAD. NO. sEd,ALN(j. ‘.> i Y.” ‘,’ :

Lat. Long. RO ‘.I. I


DRILLING CONTRACTOR: Fkhbucne -&i\\;vq STATE WELL CONSTRUCTION kJCLL ID NO.

DRILLER REGISTRATION NUMBER: 0451 PERMIT NUMBER: “r/, FCZO/Ld-3

1. WELL LOCATION: (Show sketch of the location below) Nearest Town: ~achonv~\\e County: nflsim

DEPTH

3. DATE DRILLED 3/3i1q3 USE OF WELL Mo nitar;ft

4. TOTAL DEPTH 20 ct 9

de\\ 5. CU-lTlNGS COLLECTED ;/ES 0 NOB 6. DOES WELL REPLACE EXISTING WELL? YES c] 7. STATIC WATER LEVEL Below Top of Casing:

NOm FT. 6.5

8. TOP OF CASING IS ,a (Use “+” if Above Top of Casing) FT. Above Land Surface*

l Casing Terminated atlor below land surface is illegal unless a variance is issued in accordance with 15A NCAC 2C .0118

9. YIELD (gpm): h\lA METHOD OF TEST ti/A 10. WATER ZONES (depth): Lo.5 Ft. +o tbfal &3-H\

.~ DRILLING LOG Formation Description

Grw and btot.on:

~-UT-araid SAtiDs

lo&.

11. CHLORINATION: Type tijA Amount * If additional space is needed use back of form

12. CASING:

Wall Thickness

0 Depth

5 Diameter or WeighVFt. Material

From To - Ft. 2 in Sch.L\O WC

From To- Ft. From To- Ft.

13. GROUT:

Depth Material Method From 0 To LFt. &men+ From ~TO 3 (3enbflk

14. SCREEN: Ft. ~hfh.d

Depth Diameter Slot Size Material From LTo 2%42 Ft 2 in. O.C\Cin. QC

From To- ~ Ft. in. - in. From To -Ft.- ~ in. in.

15. SAND GRAVEL PACK:

Depth Size Material From 3 To ___ 20 Ft. d0. 2 JafJn

From To Ft.

LOCATION SKETCH (Show direction and distance from at least two State

Roads, or other map reference points) r4

16. REMARKS:


GW-1 REV. s cl SIGNATURE OF CONTRACTOR OR AGiM Submit original to Division of Environmental Managemen

DATE copy to well owner.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGE

l.OlNTRODUCTlON ........................................................... 1 1.1 Definition of Terms .................................................... 1

2.0 BACKGROUND ............................................................. 3 2.1 Site Description ....................................................... 3 2.2 Land and Water Use ................................................... 3 2.3 Regional Geology ..................................................... 3 2.4 Regional Hydrogeology ................................................. 6

3.0 INVESTIGATIVE METHODS ....................... .‘. ........................... 7 3.1 Soil Sampling and Monitoring Well Installation ................................ 7 3.2 Groundwater Sampling ................................................. 8 3.3 Well Elevation Survey .................................................. 8 3.4GroundwaterMonitoring ................................................ 8

4.0 INVESTIGATIVE RESULTS ................................................... 10 4.1SiteGeology ........................................................ 10 4.2Site Hydrogeology ................................................... 10 4.3 Presence of Hydrocarbons ............................................. 10

4.3.1 Adsorbed-Phase Hydrocarbons ................................... 10 4.3.2 Dissolved-Phase Hydrocarbons ................................... 14 4.3.3 Liquid-Phase Hydrocarbons ..................................... 14

4.4 Drill Cutting and Purge Water Disposal ..................................... 14 4.5TechnicaiSummary ................................................... 15

5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17

6.0 REFERENCES............................................................. 18

Figure 1: Figure 2: Figure 3: Figure 4:

Table 1: Summary of Soil Sample Analytical Results, March 31, 1993 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Table 2: Summary of Groundwater Sample Analytical Results, April 1, 1993 . . . . . . . . . . . .

Appendix A: Appendix B:

Appendix C: Appendix D: Appendix E: Append;)c F:

LIST OF FIGURES PAGE

Site Location Map.................................................. 4 Site Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Potentiometric Surface and Dissolved-Phase Hydrocarbon Distribution Map . . . . . . . 11 Adsorbed-Phase Hydrocarbon Distribution Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -. . . . . . . . .

LIST OF TABLES

12

13 14

LIST OF APPENDICES

Geologic Well Logs Soil and Groundwater Sample Analytical Laboratory Reports with Chain-of-Custody Record Well Survey Data Well Gauging Data Waste Management Documentation

Su pp lemenbl Grwndu~w Avxalq ~a 5

1.0 INTRODUCTION

Groundwater Technology Government Services, Inc. (GSI) was contracted by the Atlantic Division

(LANTDIV) Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFACENGCOM) of the Department of the Navy to

conduct a site check to identify and/or verify suspected hydrocarbon-impacted subsurface soils and

groundwater. The site check was performed on the west side of Building FC-201 located at Marine

Corps Base, Camp Lejeune, North Carolina.

This site check is based on the NAVFAC contractual requirements. Our efforts included several

activities:

n Drilling of three soil borings;

n Installation of three monitoring wells (FC201W-1, FC201W-2 and FC201W-3) to facilitate groundwater sampling;

n Collection of soil and groundwater samples for laboratory analyses for petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations;

n Surveying of well locations;

n Determination of groundwater flow gradient; and

n Characterization, removal and treatment/disposal of soil cuttings and purged groundwater generated during field activities.

Subsequent sections of this report will describe site background information; site conditions in terms of

physiography, geology and hydrogeology; and results of the field investigations including the evaluation

for and concentrations of any petroleum hydrocarbons in the subsurface soils and groundwater.

1.1 Definition of Terms

This section defines the four phases which petroleum hydrocarbons may exist in the subsurface. Liquid-

phase hydrocarbons are liquids that may exist in the subsurface as an immobile residual liquid in the

unsaturated zone and capillary fringe or free mobile liquids that migrate near the top of the capillary

fringe. Dissolved-phase hydrocarbons are liquid-phase hydrocarbons which have dissolved in the

groundwater. The tendency for hydrocarbons to transfer to the dissolved phase are a result of the

degree of mixing and contact, and the solubility of the released substance in the groundwater.

1

Dissolved-phase hydrocarbons can be present in infiltrating water in the unsaturated zone, the capillary

fringe and in the groundwater of the saturated zone. Vapor-phase hydrocarbons are liquid-phase

hydrocarbons that have transferred into the vapor phase as the result of volatilization. Vapor-phase

hydrocarbons can be present in the pore spaces of the unsaturated zone or as small bubbles in the

saturated zone. Adsorbed-phase hydrocarbons are liquid- or dissolved-phase hydrocarbons that cover

the surfaces of sediment in the saturated and unsaturated zone.

2

2.0 BACKGROUND

2.1 Site Description

The site is located in the southern region of the Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune, North Carolina

(Figure 1). The site map (Figure 2) illustrates the location of the installed wells near Building FC-201.

According to past documents, one steel 550-gallon capacity underground storage tank (UST) used to

store waste oil was excavated and removed on July 1, 1993. Groundwater Technology GSI could not

identity any information documenting the age or condition of the UST when removed. According to the

Closure Report prepared for the site by Environmental and Regulatory Consultants, Inc. on September

15, 1992, two soil samples were collected for laboratory analysis during excavation activities. The

samples were analyzed for the presence of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH)-as-oil and grease by

Method 9071. Analytical results from the Closure Report Indicate that TPH-as-oil and grease

concentrations were 760 parts per million (ppm) in the soil sample collected at 2 feet below the north

end of the excavation and 390 ppm in the sample collected from the same depth at the south end.

2.2 Land and Water Use

Building FC-201 is located approximately 4,700 feet east of the New River The area immediately

adjacent Building FC-201 is comprised of buildings that house support facilities for the Base. The site is

situated in an area dominated by relatively flat topography. The nearest body of surface water is the

New River. Potable water for the base is supplied by wells located approximately three miles towards

the north that tap the Castle Hayne aquifer.

2.3 Regional Geology

The coastal plain consists of a layered sequence of unconsolidated sand, gravel, silt, and clay deposits

of Miocene to Holocene age. These deposits and formations of Lower Cretaceous age, which overlie

bedrock of Precambrian age, thicken and dip eastward with a thickness of 1,500 feet in the Camp

Lejeune area (Harned et al., 1989). The geologic units in the area are divided into six formations: the

Castle Hayne Formation of the Eocene Serjes; the River Bend Formation of the Oligocene Series; the

Belgrade, Pungo River, and Eastover Formations of the Miocene Series; the Yorktown Formation of the

3

SOURCE: U.S.G.S. TOPOGRAPHIC QUADRANGLE CAMP LEJEUNE, N.C. 7.5 MINUTE SERIES 34077-F3-TF-024

1971

I

SCALE 1:24,000 N

I 0 2,000 4,000

l’r’l’ SCALE FEET

L-a- iJo@l G-R~UNDWATER

IDESIGNED: I

I BH I I~L--JL---JI'I'E~HN~LoGY

1 z-14- B EXECUTIVE BLVD. CrESAPEAKE. VA. 23320

(804) 436-7881

SITE LOCATION DETAILED:

CLIENT: DRAWING DATE: PJC LANTDIV NAVFACENGCOM

3/ 15/93 D: ’ LOCATION:

BUILDING fc-201 (WEST SIDE) FIGURE:

MARINE CORPS BASE, CAMP LEJEUNE, N.C. 1

r

FORUER 550 UIUON “NOERCROUNO TbNK

FC201W-2

I

+ FC201 W- 1

+

r- Y

+ FC201 W-3

BUILDING FC-201

Llsxm

+ MONITORING WELL

0 - SCALE FEET

SOURCE: BOBBm SURMYING. PA (b/5/93)

CHEsAPfAJc v* 23320 (604) 436-76-61

REV. NO,: DRAWING DAK: 1 4/l 3/93 - f’LE: 201W-SlE

SITE MAP

CLKNT! IPU: LANTDIV NAVFACENCCOM

PW , LOCAllbN:

HLIIIDINC TC-WI (Wf’,l :.lOl’) , MAMNL Cflltt”; fIA’,I CAMI’ I I .lI II111 0 1.

1 ..aK.N ,, lJ[fAll II, IWlJl Cl tto r

Eli PJC 830011088 1801 2

-

Pliocene Series; and undifferentiated units of the Quaternary Series. The Castle Hayne Formation is

composed of limestones and marls. The Castle Hayne Formation is overlain by the River Bend

Formation. The Belgrade, Pungo River, and Eastover Formations are composed of interbedded

phosphatic sands silts and clays, diatomaceous clays, phosphatic and nonphosphatic limestones and

silty claystones (Hoffman and Ward, 1989). The Yorktown Formation Is defined as a medium- to coarse

grained, poorly sorted, shelly sand (Blackwelder and Ward, 1980). In the Camp Lejeune area, the

Yorktown Formation is characterized by fine- to medium-grain quartz sand (Harned et al., 1989). The

basal unit consists of contiguous clays. The James City Formation unconformably overlies the Yorktown

Formation. The James City Formation consists primarily of unconsolidated calcareous sandy clays and

argillaceous sands (Hoffman and Ward, 1989). The undifferentiated units, which immediately underlies

the site, are composed of fine, well-sorted sand to silty sand.

2.4 Regional Hydrogeology

In the eastern part of the North Carolina coastal plain, groundwater is obtained from an unconfined

surficial aquffer and the confined Yorktown and Castle l-layne aquifers. The depth to groundwater

typically ranges from 3 to 12 feet below the surface.

The surficial unconfined aquifer extends to depths ranging from 50 to 100 feet. This unit is not used as

a source of water on the base. The Castle Hayne aquifer, the principle source of water for the base

which consists of a series of sand and limestone beds (Harned et al., 1989), is 150 to 350 feet thick and

is between 50 and 300 feet below the surface. Aquifers below the Castle Hayne consist of a thick sand

and clay sequence and contain saltwater in the Camp Lejeune area. The general groundwater flow is in

the direction of lower hydraulic head to-discharge areas like the New River and its tributaries or the

ocean.

6

3.0 INVESTIGATIVE METHODS

3.1 Soil Sampling and Monitoring Well Installation

To investigate for the presence/absence of adsorbed-phase hydrocarbons in the soils beneath the site,

three soil borings (FC201W-1, FC201W-2 and FC2OlW-3) were drilled to a depth of 20 feet on March 31,

1993. All drilling activities were performed by a trailer-mounted drill rig equipped with lo-inch outside

diameter hollow stem augers, and all soil samples were collected with a split-spoon core sampling

device. Before and between drilling each borehole, all augers and drill rods were steam cleaned. All

split-spoon sampling devices were cleaned with an alconox wash followed by a distilled water rinse after

each sampling event. During drilling, a geologist logged drill cuttings for soil classification, and collected

split-spoon samples at each of the following depths: 0.0 to 1.5 feet, 3.5 to 5.0 feet, 8.5 to 10.0 feet, 13.5

to 15.0 feet, and 18.5 to 20.0 feet below grade surface. A portion of each core sample was placed into

the appropriate laboratory container, sealed, labelled and stored on ice. The remainder of each core

sample was placed into a labelled air-tight container which was permitted to warm to ambient

temperature where any hydrocarbons, if present, would volatilize. After the equilibration period, each

sample was scanned with a photo-ionization detector (PID) by inserting the sampling probe into the

head space of the container (the PID is a field monitoring device used to measure volatile organic

constituents in parts per million (ppm)). All PID readings were recorded on the drill logs. Upon

completion of each boring, the PID readings from each split-spoon sample were recorded and the

sample with the highest PID readings above the saturated zone was selected for laboratory analysis.

One additional soil sample was collected as a duplicate and analyzed. The corresponding sample was

stored on ice in the laboratory container and was submitted to Groundwater Technology Environmental

Laboratories, Inc. (GTEL) for analysis. The samples were analyzed for the presence of total petroleum

hydrocarbons (TPH) by gas chromatograph, flame-ionization detector (GC-FID) by U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency (EPA) Method 3550/8015. The soil samples were also analyzed for the presence of

total recoverable oil and grease by infrared spectrometry (IR) by Standard Method 5038.

The soil borings were converted to two-inch diameter monitoring wells to allow for the collection of

groundwater samples and to detect the presence/absence of liquid-phase hydrocarbons in the

groundwater. Locations of soil borings/monitoring wells are depicted on Figure 2. To counter the

effects of drilling and to maximize the hydraulic connection between the well and the surrounding

aquifer, each well was developed using a surge and pump technique. This was accomplished by

agitating the water in the well to remove the fine-grained sediments in the well screen and sand pack.

7

The sediments were then removed using a portable pump. The wells were developed until the water

visually appeared to be free of sediment. Geologic well logs detailing the lithology penetrated by each

soil boring, well construction, and the results of the PID surveys are presented in Appendix A. The

laboratory analytical report including the chain-of-custody documentation for the soil samples collected

is presented in Appendix B.

3.2 Groundwater Sampling

A groundwater sampling program was conducted to provide baseline information as to the extent and

degree of dissolved-phase petroleum hydrocarbons in groundwater beneath the site. One water sample

was collected from each monitoring well and was analyzed for the presence of dissolved-phase

purgeable aromatics by modified EPA Method 602. One additional groundwater sample was collected

as a duplicate and was also analyzed utilizing the same EPA methods.

Before groundwater sample collection, each well was purged of at least three well volumes of water. Ail

groundwater samples were collected and analyzed according to approved EPA protocols. These

protocols include protective equipment, sampling devices and techniques, sample containers, chain-of-

custody documentation, and approved laboratory techniques. Copies of the laboratory analytical report

including the chain-of-custody documentation for the groundwater samples are presented in Appendix B.

3.3 Well Elevation Survey

The top of the casing of each monitoring well was surveyed to within 0.01 feet vertical and 0.1 feet

horizontal tolerances of a temporary benchmark. The benchmark, established on the finished floor of

Building FC-201, was assumed to have an elevation of 100.00 feet. Well-head elevation data are

presented in Appendix C.

3.4 Groundwater Monitoring

The three monitoring wells were gauged on April 1, 1993. Measurements of the liquid levels in the

monitoring well were made with an electronic optical Interface Probe’” that is capable of distinguishing

liquid-phase hydrocarbons from water. Liquid levels were measured to the nearest 0.01 foot from a

permanently marked survey point on the top of each well casing to allow measured values to be directly

compared to a common datum. Measurements made in the field included depth to water, depth to

8

liquid-phase hydrocarbons (ii present), and thickness of liquid-phase hydrocarbons (if present). If the

presence of liquid-phase hydrocarbons was indicated by measurements with the Interface Probe”, a

clear acrylic bailer was used to obtain a groundwater sample from the well for visual confirmation. Ail

measured liquid levels and all pertinent field observations were immediately recorded in a bound field

book to provide a permanent record of the site visit.

9

4.0 INVESTIGATIVE RESULTS

4.1 Site Geology

The stratigraphy directly beneath the site, as determined by well logs (Appendix A) compiled during

drilling of the soil borings, is characterized by loose fine-grained sand and gravel.

4.2 Site Hydrogeology

During the drilling of the soil borings, saturated soils were encountered at 6 to 8 feet below the surface.

Subsequent to well completion, the water table stabilized between approximately 5 and 7 feet below the

surface. The groundwater at the site is under semi-confined to unconfined hydraulic conditions. Well

gauging data recorded on April 1, 1993, were used to prepare a potentiometric map (Figure 3) indicating

a groundwater flow direction towards the south. The hydraulic gradient across the site is approximately

0.003 feet per foot.

4.3 Presence of Hydrocarbons

4.3.1 Adsorbed-Phase Hydrocarbons

On March 31, 1993, three soil borings were drilled at the site and converted to monitoring wells

FC201 W-l, FC201 W-2 and FC201 W-3. Soil samples were collected from each borehole and scanned

with a PID. The results of PID monitoring of split-spoon samples collected during the drilling activities

are presented in Table 1. One soil sample was collected from each boring and was analyzed for

hydrocarbons by GC-FID and IR. Sample DUPE is a duplicate sample of the soil sample collected at 3.5

to 5 feet below grade in monitoring well FC201 W-l. Laboratory analytical results are presented in

Appendix B and are summarized in Table 1. Analytical results indicate that adsorbed-phase

hydrocarbon concentrations by GC-FID in all of the soil samples collected were less than the

laboratory’s reported method detection limits. Total oil and grease (TOG) concentrations by IR were less

than the laboratory’s reported method detection limits in samples collected from monitoring well

FC201W-1 and FC201W-3. The TOG concentration in the duplicate soil sample collected from

monitoring well FC2OlW-1 contained 53 ppm. The soil sample collected at 3.5 to 5 feet below the

surface in monitoring well FC201W-2 contained 220 ppm TOG. A composite soil sample (CS-1) was

collected from the drill cuttings was submitted to GTEL and analyzed for the presence of TPH by EPA

Method 418.1. The analytical results indicate that the TPH concentration was 100 ppm.

10

l.L!aQ

+ MONITORING WELL

(91.68) RELATIVE GROUNDWATER ELEVATION (ft.) I

- POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE CONTOUR

- GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRCTION

FORMER 550 GALLON UNDERCROUNO TbAK

BUILDING FC-201

FCZOIW-3 (91.63)

0

- SCALE FEET

SOURCE: BOBElTT SURVMNC. PA (4/5/93)

I POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE MAP I

CLICNT:

LANTOIV NAVFACENCCOM

LOCATION: BUILDING FC-201 (WEST SIDE)

~‘.I(Ncb: IJt IAILt~. I’tWJrCT NO I ll.tJl~r

Eli PJC a3001 1088.1801 3

r FORMER 550 WUON UNOERCROUNO T#+,K

+ FC201W-1 DEPTH: 8.5-10 ft. TPH-AS-LUBRICATING OIL: (13 ppm (1,200 ppm) TOTAL OIL & GREASE : <40 ppm (53 ppm)

+ FC201 W-3

DEPW x5-5 11. TPH-AS-LUBRICATING OIL: <12 p,,m TOTAL OIL & GREASE: 68 p&m

BUILDING FC-201

l.Ea!.Q

+ MONITORING WELL

TPH-AS-LUBRICATING OIL CONCENTRATION BY EPA METHOD 3550/8015 IN ppm

TOTAL OIL AND GREASE CONCENTRATlON BY STANDARD METHOD 413.1 IN pprn

(53 ppm) DUPLICATE SAMPLE ANALYTICAL RESULTS

0 - SCALE FEET

SOURCE: BOBEITI SURMYING. PA (4/5/93)

CHESAPWXE. “k 2Jxo (604) 436-7881

ACM f’lE: 201 W-STE

ADSORBED-PHASE HYDROCARBON DISTRIBUTION MAP

CLIENT: LANTOIV NAVFACE NCCOM

LOCArlON; BUILDING FC-201 (WEST SIDE) 4

MARINE CORPS QASE, CAMP LfJfWf. El.C ?&2NCO: OCIAILCO: mJCC1 Nfi rILIlLr

EH PJC a3001 1088.1801 4

Table 1 Summary of Soil Sample Analytical Results

By EPA Method 418.1 and Standard Method 5038 March 31. 1993

FC201W-3 o-1.5 -- -- -- -- -- -_ - 0.9

II GT-3 3.5-5 cl2 cl2 <12 cl2 cl2 <12 <3a 1.6

8.5-10 -- -_ _- -- -- -- -- 0.8

II 13.5-15 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1.0

18.5-20 -- -- -- -- -- __ 1.9 _

II DUP DUPE 3.5-5 <13 cl3 <I3 cl3 cl2 1,200 53 WA pw = parts per million (mg/kg) PID

;,A TOG = Total Oil and Grease

= Photo Ionization Detector Reading (based on a similar response using calibration gas) = Sample not submitted to laboratory for analysis = Below laboratory’s reported method detection limit = Data Not Taken

DUPE is duplicate of sample GT-1 at 3.5 to 5 feet

13

4.3.2 Dissolved-Phase Hydrocarbons

Groundwater samples were collected from monitoring wells FC201 W-l, FC201 W-2 and FC2Ol W-3 on

April 1, 1993, and analyzed for the presence of dissolved-phase purgeable aromatics by modified EPA

Method 602. Copies of the analytical reports including the chain-of-custody documentation are

presented in Appendix B and are summarized in Table 2. Analytical results for the groundwater samples

collected indicate that dissolved-phase petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations were less than the

laboratory’s reported method detection limit in all of the groundwater samples collected. Benzene,

toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes concentrations in the groundwater samples collected were less than

the State Water Quality Standards established by the North Carolina Department of Environment, Health

and Natural Resources (NCDEHNR).

Table 2 x Summary of Groundwater Sample Analytical Results

By Modified EPA Method 602 April 1, 1993

< = less than laboratory’s reported method detection limit SWQS = state .water quality standards NOTE: DUP* is a duplicate of sample FC201W-1.

G+ See supp~emen-tal groundu/aicr analyses cm inscried ctmysp~ncfen CC, App~ndj~ E 4.3.3 Liquid-Phase Hvdrocarbons

Monitoring wells FC201W-1, FC201W-2 and FC2OlW-3 were gauged on April 1, 1993 (Appendix D).

Liquid-phase hydrocarbons were not detected in any of the wells during the gauging event.

4.4 Drill Cutting and Purge Water Disposal

During the drilling of each of the monitoring wells, drill cuttings from the boreholes were collected and placed in

four 55-gallon barrels. Upon completion of site activities a composite soil sample (CS-1) of all the cuttings was

collected and analyzed for:

BTEX by EPA Method 8020; Polychlorinated Biphenyls by EPA Method 8080; Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons by modified EPA Method 418.1; Metals using the toxicity characteristic leaching procedure (TCLP) by EPA Methods 8010 and 7470; Extractable Organic Halides by EPA Method 800-4-84-008; and Percentage Moisture by EPA CLP Method.

Soils were disposed of accordingly in compliance with contract, state, federal and local regulations. The drums

were transported with a waste manifest to a remediation facility located in Fayetteville, North Carolina for

treatment and disposal. Prior to transport, a completed material characterization form (Appendix E) and copy of

the composite soil sample analytical results was provided to the remediation contractor for acceptance of the

soils.

Within the treatment facility, the soils are emptied from the drums upon a thick low-permeability soil floor in a

large, enclosed building. An inoculum of known hydrocarbondigesting microbes is added to the material and

the pH is adjusted to approximately 7 to 8. A bulking agent such as chicken manure may be added and the

materials are agitated. Following a period of approximately 30 days of biodegradation, one composite soil

. sample is collected from each 50 tons of treated material to assess the treatment conducted and ensure proper

cleanup levels are achieved. Once cleanup levels are attained, the material is then used for road base, asphalt

mixes, fill material, and other apprapriate uses. Upon completion of remediation, a certificate with complete

analytical data, will be forwarded to the generator to remove this portion of responsibility.

On May 20, 1993, the drums of soil cuttings were removed from the site and transported to the remediation

facility for treatment. Copies of the application for treatment of petroleum-contaminated soil and waste manifest

are presented in Appendix E.

During monitoring well development and groundwater sample collection, purge water was stored in two 55-

gallon drums on site. The purge water was treated using a portable carbon adsorption unit and discharged on

site.

4.5 Technical Summary

Groundwater Technology GSI has completed a three well site check for the east side of Building FC-201 located

at the Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune, North Carolina. The site check was designed to comply with NAVFAC

contractual requirements.

15

Three soil borings/monitoring wells were drilled and installed at the site on March 31, 1883. Soils in the area are

characterized as fine-grained sand and gravel. Analytical results indicate that adsorbed-phase hydrocarbon

concentrations in all of the soil samples collected from the soil borings are less than the laboratory’s reported

method detection limits with the exception of 220 ppm total oil and grease at 3.5 to 5 feet in monitoring well

FC2OlW-2 and 53 ppm total oil and grease at 3.5 to 5 feet in monitoring well FC201 W-l.

Based on liquid-level measurements, the depth to groundwater is at approximately 6 to 8 feet. The hydraulic

gradient across the site on April 1, 1993, was 0.003 feet per foot towards the south. Liquid-phase hydrocarbons

were not measured or observed in the monitoring wells during the April 1, 1993 well gauging event.

Groundwater samples were collected from the monitoring wells and analyzed for aromatic purgeable

hydrocarbons by modified EPA Method 602. Dissolved-phase hydrocarbon concentrations were less than the

laboratory’s reported method detection limit in the groundwater sample collected from monitoring well FC201W-1

and FC2OlW-3. Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes concentrations in the groundwater samples

collected from all of the monitoring wells are less than the State Water Quality Standards established by the

NCDEHNR.

16

5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS

Based on the results of this site check, Groundwater Technology GSI suggests the following additional action at

the site:

n Review the UST removal documentation to determine if the excavated soil was removed from the site and disposed or used as backfill in the excavation. If the excavated soils were used as backfill material, the soils that had originally surrounded the UST would have the greatest potential for containing adsorbed-phase hydrocarbons.

17

zz@ GROUNDWATER :,i/z TECHNOLOGY

6.0 REFERENCES

Blackwelder, B.W., and Ward, LW., 1980, Stratigraphy of the Chesapeake Group of Maryland and Virginia. Geological Society of America, Annual Meeting, March 1976, Guidebook for Fieldtrip 7b, Arlington, Virginia, pp. l-55.

Hoffman, C.W., and Ward, LW.. 1989, Upper Tertiary and Pleistocene Deposits of Northeastern North Carolina, In: Harris, W.B., Hurst, V.J., Nystrom, P.G. and Ward, LW., eds., Upper Cretaceous and Cenozoic Geology of the Southeastern Atlantic Coastal Plain, 28th International Geological Congress, pp. 68-75.

Harned, D.A., Lloyd, Jr., O.B., and Treece, Jr., M.W., 1989, Hydrogeologic Water Level, and Water Quality Data from Monitoring Wells at Camp Lejeune Marine Corps Base, North Carolina. United States Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigation Report 894.096.

APPENDIX A

Geologic Well Logs

YNIFIFn SOI1 Cl ASSIFICATION SYSTEM

CLASSIFICATION CHART

MAJOR DIVISIONS

MORE THAN l/2 OF COARSE FRACTION>

NO;4 SIEVE SIZE

SANI-JS

MORE THAN l/2 OF COARSE FRACTION<

NO.4 SIEVE SIZE

SIl TS G CLAYS

CL<50

SJl TS 6 Cl AYS

CL>50

HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS

TYPICAL NAMES I

GW 10; Well graded gravels or gravel-sand mixtures, litlle Or no fines

26

1

* sp :::I. Poorly graded sands or gravelly sands, little or no fines 6 . . .

SM : Silty sands, sand-silt mixtures

sc y: Clayey sands, sand-clay mixtures /

ML Inorganic siltys and very fine sands, rock flour, silty .or.clayey fine sands or clayey silts with slight plasticity I 11

Inorganic clays of low to medium plasticity, gravelly clays, sandy clays, silty clays, lean clays 14

I I OL I’ll

Organic silts andorganic silty clays of low plasticity 18

Inorganic silts. micaceous or diatomaceous fine sandy or silty soils, elastic silts 12

Inorganic clays of high plasticity, fat clays 15

’ ’ Organic clays of medium to high plasticity, organic silty clays, OH ///a organic silts 35

Pt Peat and other hightly organic soils

20

GRAIN SIZE CHART

CLASSIFICATION

BOULDERS

COBBLES

%zii FINE

SAND

%I%~ FINE

SILT 6 CLAY

RANGE i)F GRAIN SIZES

U.S. Standard I

Grain Size Sieve Size in Millimeters

No.4 to No.200 4.75 to 0.074 No.4 to No.10 4.76 to 2.00 No.10 to No.40 2.00 to 0.420

No.40 to No.200 0.420 to 0.074

Below No.200 ~~ I ~~~~ Below No.0.074

SAMPLE TYPES SS - Split Spoon CC - Continuous Core CG - Cuttings Grab

SYMBOLS

H Initial Water Level T Static Water Level

WELL CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS

Asphalt (68) SCREENS

El3 .J:i\ Concrete (55) : y.

Q P ‘, Neat Cement (54)

n :+?:9:6: Base Course (30)

_::_.

Sluff (64) sl i Slot. PVC High Flow (8~1

Bentonite (21) Wire Wound PVC (16~)

.’ r .‘.’

Filter Pack (7) Wire Wound Steel (15~)

. . n

. . Pea Gravel (2)

B Liner (33)

El -.- Geoclolh (36) -.-. --

34/22/1983 keyprint-lan

q ICIB Li q uu Drilling Log

Monitor i GROUNCN~AER TECHNOLOGY GOVERNMENT SERVICES

project Buildinq FC-201 West Owner LAN TDI V NA VFACENGCOM Location MCB, Camp Lejeune, NC project No. 8300/1088.18 Date drilled 3/3’/93 Surface Elev. Total Hole Oepth 20 ft. Diameter -8 ifi Top of Casing Water Level Initial 8 ft. Static 6.30 ft. Screen: Oia 2 in. Length 15 ft. Type/Size .@O in. Casing: Oia 2 in. Length 5 ft. Type Sch. 40 PVC

Filter Pack Material NO. 2 Sand Rig/Core Type CME 45C/Spit Spoon Drilling Company Fishburne Drilling Method biOiiOW Stt?tTl Auger Permit # Driller Malt Taylor Log BY Rick Paciorka

Checked By Taylor Sword License No. CPG APIG /8334

,

L

4

6

16

18

5.2

T ;

ng Well FC201W-1

See Site Map For Boring Location

COMMENTS:

Monitoring weIs FVOtW-( FC2OlW-2 and FCZOIW-3 were Asta&ed on the west side of BukSng FC-201 at MCB. Camp Le@me. NC

Description

(Color. Texture, Structure) rrace c 10%. Little 10% to 20%. Some 20% to 35%. And 35% to 502

Light grey and light brown color, dry, fine-grained SAND, loose.

Light grey color, dry to moist. fine-gralned SAND, loose.

Encountered water

Yight grey color, saturated, fine-grained SAND, loose.

Light grey color, saturated, fine-grained SAND, very loose, running sands.

Light grey color. saturated, fine- to medium-gralned SAND, very loose, weight of hammer enough to collect so11 sample.

End of boring.

Page: I of I o:..:s, 1993 li:hlog- Ian93

GROUNDWATER TECHNOLOGY GOVERNMENT SERVICES

Drilling Log

Monitoring Well FC201W-2

prolect 6uildin.q Fe-201 West Owner LAN TDI V NA VFACENGCOM Location MCt3, Camp Leieune, NC prolect No. 830011088.18 Date drilled 3/3//93 Surface Elev. Total Hole Depth 20 ft. Diameter 8 in. Top of Casing Water Level Initial 6 ft. Static 5.27 ft.

Screen: Dia 2 in. Length 15 ft. Type/Size .&XJ in. Casing: Ola 2 in. Length ufl. Type Sch. 40 PVC

Filter Pack Material No. 2 Sand Rig/Core Type CME 45C/Spit SPOOn Drilling Company Fishbwne Dril1in.q Method /-tol/Ow Stem Auger Permit # Driller Matt Taylor Log BY Rick Paciorka

Checked By TayIor Sword License No. CPG APIG #8334

L- -a. 2-

0-

6

8

16

18

24

1.6

1.6

.L

See Site Map For Boring Location

COMMENTS:

Monitoring we& FVOIW-L FCZOIW-2 and FCZOIW-3 were inslaCed on the west side of BukSng FC-201 at MC& Camp LeRme. NC

Description

(Color, Texture. Structure) rrace c 10%. Little 10% to 20%. Some 20% to 35%. And 35% to 50%

Light grey and ligh t loose.

brown color, dry. fine-grained SAND. very

Light grey color. moist, fine-grained SAND and GRAVEL, loose.

Encountered water

Light grey color, saturated, fine-grained SAND and GRAVEL, loose.

Light grey color, saturated. fine-grained SAND and GRAVEL.

Light grey color, fine-grained SAND. loose.

Light grey color, saturated, fine- to medmm-gralned SAND. very loose, running sands.

End of boring.

O~f2Sil993 i,lhlog- tan93 Page: I 01 I

GROUNDWATER TECHNOLOGY GOVERNMENT SERVICES

Drilling Log

Monitoring Well FC201W-3

Project Bui1din.q FC-201 West Owner LAN TDI V NA VFACENGCOM

Location MCB. Camp Leieune, NC project No. 8300/1088.18 Oate drilled 3/3//93 Surface Elev. Total Hole Oepth 20 ft. Diameter 8 in. Top of Casing Water Level Initial 8.75 ft. Static 6.5 ft. Screen: Oia 2 in. Length ‘5 ft. Type/Size .@o in. Casing: Oia 2 in. Length 5 ft. - Type Sch. 40 PVC

Filter Pack Material No. 2 Sand Rig/Core Type CME 45C/S,oit SRoon orilling Company Fishburne Drilling Method iiOt/OW Stem Auqer Permit # Driller Matt Taylor Log BY Rick Paclorka

Checked By Taylor Sword License No. CPG APIG 18334

SE a.2

i I 1 1

COMMENTS:

Monrlonng web FC201hy FCZOIW-2 and FC2OlW-3 were tislak¶ on Ihe wesf side of BcJding FC-201 al MCB. CampLe,ixme. NC.

Description

(Color, Texture, Structure) Trace < 10%. Little 10% to 20X, Some 20% to 35%. And 35% to 50%

Light grey and light brown color, dry, fine-gralned SAND, loose.

Light brown and tan color. dry to moist, fine-grained SAND, loose.

Light brown and tan color, very moist. fine-grained SAND. loose.

ight grey color, saturated, fine-grarned SAND. loose.

Encountered water

Light grey color, saturated, fine-gratned SAND. loose.

Ltght grey color, saturated, fine- to coarse-grarned SAND, very loose, fining upwards.

End of boring.

Page: 1 of I

APPENDIX B

Soil and Groundwater Sample Analytical Laboratory Report with Chain-of-Custody Record

GTE ENVIRONMENTAL

- LABORATORIES, INC.

Client Number: 830011088 Project ID: LANTDIV

Login Number: M3-04-0101

Northeast Region Meadowbrook Industrial Park Milford, NH 03055 (603) 672-4835 (603) 673-8105 (FAX)

April 9, 1993

Taylor Sword Government Services, Inc. 1244-B Executive Blvd. Chesapeake, VA 23320

Dear Mr. Sword:

Enclosed please find the analytical results for the samples received by GTEL Environmental Laboratories, Inc. on 04/03/93 under chain-of-custody record 54836.

A formal Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QA/QC) program is maintained by GTEL, which is designed to meet or exceed the EPA requirements. Analytical work for this project met QA/QC criteria unless otherwise stated in the footnotes.

If you have any questions regarding this analysis, or if we can be of further assistance, please call our Customer Service Representative.

Sincerely,

GTEL Environmental Laboratories, Inc.

Laboratory Director

GTEL Milford, NH A3040101.00c:1

Client Number: 63001108El Project ID: LANTDIV


ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Purgeable Aromatics in Water Modified EPA Method 602a

a b

Federal Register, Vol. 49, October 26, 1964. Method modified to include additional compounds; The detection limit multiplier indicates the adjustments made to the data and detection limits for sample dilutions.

GTEL Milford, NH A3040101.00(=:2

GTEL ENVIRONMENTAL

- LABOPAlOF!IES. INC.

0 A

itweatj

0 lutod qsetj

q ~(I!+oJJ~ '3

0 ‘1

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 i i 3

I 0

peal sye6J

0 0109 0

1ZPL 0

OZP

L 0 L’O

OZ 0

Z’6CZ P

es

, p qus 0 3x-t v4akv WV

0

vwtl

0 -Iv1 dbem

iod h!JO

!Jd - steiapi Vd

0 9JaH

0 W

d 0

vokws

0 V

OA

0 stew

dl3

0 w

.w!qqi

p saPw

ad 0

stew

x01 d

0 O

lE8 0 019 V

d

0 (G

Z + ) SS

N 0

lVlIO

LZ8 0

ldd829 V

d

0 61 + ) s9-N

0 lV

l/OP

Z8 0

lddbZ9 V

d:

0 0808 0 809 V

d:

0 O

Z08 Vd3 0 209 V

dl

0 0108 V

d3 q 109 V

di

0 2’209 V

d3 0 1’C

OS

Vd!

q m4d3aaom

~9Sai

0 S

O9 W

S 0

1’8lP ttl/H

d.

0 txt9 w

s 0

z’cw

0 133~ =w

3 w

e I!(

0 (S

laWlS

) WoJd

‘J’WJem

JPb

0 uaaJ3S

0

tasata 0

seg ai3m

suoqJe2oJP4

0 3E

llW W

!M 0

award

sWJem

JPA

H

sezmif

3 D

, . r

C

I 13H

.g m

naotld

39ams

-E

z W

V

110:

tl31VN

sJau!eluo=) #

GTE1 ENVIRONMENTAL

- LABORATORIES. INC.

Cli&t Number: 830011088 Project ID: BLDG FC-201 West


Northeast Region Meadowbrook Industrial Park Milford, NH 03055 (603) 672-4835 (603) 673-8105 (FAX)

April 12, 1993

Taylor Sword Government Services, Inc. 1244-B Executive Blvd Chesapeake, VA 23320

Dear Mr. Sword:


A formal Quality Assurance / Quality Control (QA/QC) program is maintained by GTEL, which is designed to meet or exceed the EPA requirements. Analytical work for this project met QA/QC criteria unless otherwise stated in the footnotes.


Sincerely,


laboratory Director

GTEL Milford, NH J304009O.DOC:1

Client Number: 830011088 Project ID: BLDG FC-201 West


ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Hydrocarbon Screen in Soil by GC FlDa

a Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, SW-846, Third Edition, Revision 0, US EPA November 1986; Methylene chloride extraction b Resources Control Board LU I=?

modified EPA Method 3550; modification as per California State Water Manual protocols. Concentration calculated on a dry weight basis.

GTEL Milford, NH J304009O.DOC:2

GTE1 ENVIRONMENlAl

- LASORATORIfS. INC.

- - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - cl 4 0

TEL ENVIRONMENTAL


Client Number: 830011088 Project ID: BLDG FC-201

West Login Number: M3a4-0091

Northeast Region Meadowbrook industrial Park Milford, NH 03055 (603) 672-4835 (603) 673-8105 (FAX)

April 22, 1993

Taylor Sword Government Services, inc. 1244-B Executive Blvd. Chesapeake, VA 23320

Dear Mr. Sword:

Enclosed’please find the analytical results for the samples received by GTEL Environmental Laboratories, Inc. on 04/03/93 under chain-of-custody record 54816.

A formal Quality Assurance / Quality Control (CIA/W) program is ‘maintained by GTEL, which is designed to meet or exceed the EPA requirements.. Analytical work for this project met QA/QC criteria unless otherwise stated in the footnotes.

If you have any questions regarding this analysis, ‘or if we can be of further assistance, please calI our Customer Service Representative.

Sincerely,


$b oratory Director

GTEL Milford, NH K304009 1 .DOC: I


West Login Number: M3-04-0091

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Aromatic Volatile Organics in Soil Modified EPA Method 8020a

a Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, SW-846, Third Edition, Revision 0, US EPA November 1986; Methanolic extractign by EPA Method 5030 (purge and trap). Method modified to include additional compounds.

b The sample dilution factor indicates the adjustments made to the data.and detection limits as a result of dilutions and percent solids.

GTEL Milford, NH K3040091 .DOC:2

GTE1 ENVlRONMENlAL

- LA8ORAlORlES. INC.



ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Polychlorlnated Blphenyls In Soll EPA Method 8080a

a Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, SW-846, Third Edition, Revision 0, US EPA November 1986;

b Extraction by EPA Method 3550 (low level sonication). Results are reported on a dry weight basis. The detection limit multiplier indicates the adjustments made to the data and detection limits as a result of dilutions and percent solids.

GTEL Milford. NH K3040091 .DOC:3

GTE1 ENVlPONMENlAL

- LAIORATORIES. INC.



ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Metals in TCLP Leachatea

a Federal Register, June 29,1990,40 CFR, Part 261, Appendix II - Method 1311. These data are corrected for analytical bias as required by Method 1311 by applying a correction determined by matrix spike

b recovery. Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, SW-846, Third Edition, Revision 0, US EPA, November 1986; Digestion by Method 3050 (except mercury).

C The quantitation limit multiplier.indicates the adjustments made to the data and detection limits for sample dilutions.


GTE1 ENVIRONMENIAI

- LABOPAlORIES. INC.



ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Extractable Organic Halides in Soila

Sample Date Identification Sampled

Date Analyzed

Percent Detection Concentration, Solids, % Umit, mg/kg mg/kg

GTEL No.

. 040091-01

Client ID

cs-1

_- _-

03/31/93 04/13/93 80.2 , 76 c 76

a EPA 600/4-84-008. Appendix D, Method for Extractable Organic Halides in Soil, US EPA, June, 1983. Concentration is calculated on a dry weight basis.

.


GTE1 ENVIRONMENlAl

- LAIORAlORlES. INC



ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Total Recoverable Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Soil by Infrared Spectrometry

Modified EPA Method 418.la

Sample Identification

Date Date Date Percent Detection Sampled Extracted Analyzed Solids, % Limit, mg/kg

Concentration, ’ mg/kg

GTEL No. Client ID -

040091-01 CS-1 03/31/93 04/07/93 04/08/93 80.2 40 100 .4

a EPA 600/4-79620, March 1983 revision. Extraction modified for soils (Soxhlet). Concentration calculated on a dry weight basis. .


GTE1 ENVIRONMENTAL

- LABORAIORIES. INC.


West Login Number: M3-04-0091 a

ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Percent Moisture EPA CLP Methoda

Sample Date Identification Sampled

GTEL No. Client ID --

040091-01 cs-1 03/31/93

Date Analyzed

04/05/93

Percent Moisture

--

19.8

a EPA CLP Statement of Work, ILM 01 .Ol , Section IV, Part F.


GTE!. ENVIRONMENlAL

w LAOOPAlOPIES. INC.

APPENDIX C

Well Survey Data

MDN I TOR WELL

MNI7OR WLL

ELEV. 96. 95

BENCHMARK I.5 f,N,S”EO FLOOR lNS,DE DOORWAY.

REVlSEO ON JULY 77H, 1993

BOBB I TT SURVEY I NG, P. A. P. 0. BOX 952 \ 443 DAEINEY DRIVE

HENDERSON. NORTH CAROL INA, 27536 (OFFICE) 919 - 438 - 5162

(FAX) 919 - 438 - 7494

SURVEY f OR

CAMP L E JUNE 60 20 0 20 40

/IIIIIIIII I I 1

GRAPHIC SCALE - FEE 1

( BUILDING NO. FC-201 WEST ) ONSI. OW COUN 1 Y, NO/? l/I CAllOL INA

SCALE I’ . 20 t-EE7 APRIL 57H. 1993

I PLAT FlLE NO. 93-0-M-22

APPENDIX D

Well Gauging Data

GOVERNMENTSERVICES Groundwater Technology Government Services, Inc.

1244 B Executive Boulevard. Suite 106. Chesalxalie. VA 23320 Tel: (804) 436-7881 F& @IL%) 43&2312

LIQUID LEVEL MEASUREMENTS CLIENT: NAVFACENGCOM LOCATION: Building FC-201, West Side

MCB, Camp Lejeune, NC DATE: April 1, 1993

MONITORING WELLS

DEPTH TO WATER MEASURED RELATIVE TO LIP OF PVC

DTW = Depth to Water DTP = Depth to Product PT = Product Thickness TOC = Top of Casing

Efev-W = Elevation of Water Corrected Elev-W = Corrected water elevation for the

presence of hydrocarbon floating on water table

= TOC ELEV - DTW + (PT x 0.88)

the


APPENDIX E

Waste Management Documentation

FROM : TERRADWE EtW I ROt4lEt4TAL PHONE NO. : 919 436 WE)0 PQ6

FOR OFFICE USE ONLY

TERRADYNE Slke. 'I'ERRADYNE Job No. mtc

Date Accepted 'Date _Re jecioh Datr Hrceived

Date Start Treatmrlnl: Date ___ End ‘rrcacment DdLc: Return .._.. ---

EXHIBIT A ~PPLXCATION FOR TREATXRNT of PETROLEUX CONTAHINATKD SOIL

Qeneral Directions: In order to determiaa whether TERRADYNE BNVIRONHENTAL SERVICES, INC. Can @rnp?rfy and aafnly handle and treat your PCS, We must obtain information about the chemical. and physical propcLLir3 of thr vssto. ~leooc be complete in your onsverc; if

your response is “none” or “not available, m so indir:ate. Answers must be printed in ink or typewritten and the campleted form s1gnp.d.

1)

2)

3)

.4)

5) 6) 7)

91

10)

11)

Generator/Owner Name/Addres,s Ncivz11 k’aCilitlCs Rlgi~ring ~Iwd/~+S/~ Ej~vi~~!m?i~(lal

nt Buildins QQl , * c;lmo5001 FX ditc Complete Add&s/Description (No P.0. Box.)_~~dinZ-~a[;?l--~rt~(36! v--w-..

. -AaL---.’ -.- Enqinecr/Environmcntal FIrm~~rmmnt Qmir~~, 4 TX . Project Yanager Taylor tGX.ad, C.P.G. _. . . Comp~ny/A&lrfwi 1244B -VIZ Boulevard. Suite 1 Oe,,. chgsa~~akc. VA. 23320 Telephone Number (804) 436-7881 . -- PCS site Dctcription (Gas. station, Eull service or conv~nit?nca SiZQKe, Car

dealership, number of tanks, age of tanks, type of fuel sold, tank or plumbing leak, accident, etc. 1. Attdcfb Erlyihreriug Report, or Assc??rament .

ellon UST wac oxam in lr)O9 *fi n4-d - @no 550 -To install& ta ovaluato soil & grour&Jobr

&pc of Contamination (Qaaoline, Jet Pucl, Dicocl;’ dthcr) ~zlcte A(? Anticipated Volume? ar 55-m Af Atill mrttinnc. (TONS) Soil Type (Sand, Clay, Unified Soil Classiflcationl Si1t.v Cend

8 1 Averaye Contamination 100 gp ppm Heasured by Lah Tnsts ts this sail .=I mHazarrfaus Vaster as dcfincd by Regulations ot the U.S. E.P.A. pursuant, to Section 3001 of the Rcpourcc Conservation ;rnd Recovery Act (See 10 CFR, Part 261 for definition). Yes Soil Properties (TCLP,

Ho m Total PetroldumHydrocarbon, ‘c noibture, etc.) Attach

Shyinrer irlg~ErlvirurImt!riLdl RrporL V~UI L&oratory results. THE PROCEDURES ON’THE REVEWE SIDE SHALL BE FOLLOVED WTll %'ECTPICTTY AND-ARE HADE A PART OF THIS APPLICATION.

I hereby certify that the above-attached description Is complete and accurate to the best Of my knovlcdyc and ‘ability to . determine, that no deliberate or villful omisqi.onc of campnriFian of properties exiaf-s and all lcnnvn nr rnrPs&ed hazards have been disclased. rn the event that any of the dat.a 1s determined to be incomplete, inaccux.jtu or micrcptcsctitotion, the undcroiyncd agtccc; to indemnify TERRADYNE from and ayainct any and all loss, cost or dnmaqor, including attorney fees which It may suffer.

Upon.acccptancc of thic application by ZERRADYNE, it chall boc’omo a material part of the Agreement betvaen the parties hereto and attached thereto as Exhibit A.

Da to d5\93 Name h\e\ D.xht\i~n Title c.hp-,‘st

ized Signatory JrF,-, Name /I I/ IAM 1. /

4 LLoluT<Title&&jJ

Rcqistration (P.E.,P.G. l--m __-__ _,. ._,._, ..____ _ stete

ACCWTED : SERVICES, INC.

/

ADYNE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 8 Ann Street Fayetteville, NC 28301

19/486-4285 / FAX 919/486-0200

NON-HAZARDOUS WASTE MANIFEST

/ TERRADYNE JOB # 930098-01 LOAD #

ENVR CONSULTANT: Groundwater Techno1oqy’G.S. CON TACT : Bi 11 Hushes 1244 B-Executive Blvd. St 106 PHONE : 804-436-7881 ChesaDeake. VA 23320

GENERATOR: Buildbq FC-201 CONTACT : West Side Main Service Road PHONE:

LeJeune. NC

TRANSPORTER: Terradyne Environmental Services CONTACT : Torn Hoen 1 oman 818 Ann Street PHONE: 919-486-4285 Favetteville, NC 28301

DESTINATION: -E ENVIROS CONTACT: _TERRADYNE ENVLRON.VICES Facility 818 Ann Street PHONE : YlY/406-4285

Favetteville, NC 28301 919/486-0200 (FAX)

WASTE DESCRIPTION: NON-HAZARDOUS PETROLEUM CONTAMINATED SOIL I

WASTE ORIGINATION POINT (COMPLETE ADDRESS): Buildinq FC-201, West Side Main Service Road, MCB. CamD LeJeune, NC

TRUCK P GROSS WEIGHT : TARE WEIGHT: ____-,_

NET WEIGHT :

GENERATOR’S CERTIFICATION: I certify the materials described above on this manifest are not subject to federal regulations for reporting proper disposal of HAZARDOUS WASTE.

PRINTED/TYPED NAME, TITLE DATE

.SLs-. c!-tNLAt- t-s \ v-

TRUCK DRIVER’S SIGNATURE (actaovledqcrent of receipt of aatcrlal): ---.- - Date:

NOTED DISCREPANCIES:

INSPECTED 6 ACCEPTED (except as noted above) BY:

SIGNED BY:

TRUCKS MUST HAVE (1) THIS MANIFEST AND (2) WEIGHT TICKET TRUCKERS MUST KNOW TARE WEIGHT

WHIU: Terradyne Off ice CAMI: Gemator

PIH: Transport GOLDEIIBOD: Facility Receipt

[--iiii.J GOVERNMENTSERVICES Groundwater Technology Government Services. Inc.

1244 B Executive Boulevard, Suite 106, Chesapeake, VA 23320 Tel: (804) 4367881 Fax: (804) 43&2312

August 25, 1993

Job No. 830011088.1801

Commander Atlantic Division Naval Facilities Engineering Command Attn: Mr. C. Hilton, Code 1821 Norfolk, Virginia 2351 1-6299

RE: Additional Groundwater Sampling at Building FC-201, West Side Marine Corps Base (MCB), Camp Lejeune, North Carolina Contract No. N62470-91 -D-6652, Delivery Order 018, Modification 02

Dear Mr. Hilton:

Groundwater Technology Government Services, Inc. (GSI) was contracted by the Atlantic Division (LANTDIV) Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFACENGCOM) of the Department of the Navy to collect additional groundwater samples from the monitoring wells located on the west side of Building FC-201, Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune, North Carolina. These water samples were analyzed by EPA Method 610 for polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons. The requested additional analyses were performed as a result of the modification request and to further comply with state regulations.

The scope of work performed was under Delivery Order No. 0018, Modification 02, for the site check for the west side of Building FC-201. The Site Check Report for Building FC-201, West Side, Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, is dated July 6, 1993. Please include these results and findings with the previously submitted report.

On August 6, 1993, one groundwater sample was collected from each monitoring well and was analyzed for the presence of dissolved-phase polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons by modified EPA Method 610. Before groundwater sample collection, each well was purged of at lease three well volumes of water. All groundwater samples were collected with a Teflon”’ surface sampler and analyzed according to EPA protocols. Prior to sampling each well, the sampling equipment was cleaned with laboratory grade detergent and distilled wafer to minimize cross-contamination. Sampling protocols used include protective equipment, approved sampling devices and techniques, sample containers, chain-of-custody documentation, and approved laboratory techniques. Copies of the laboratory analytical report including the chain-of-custody documentation for the groundwater samples are attached.

Analytical results indicate that analyte analyzed by EPA Method 610 were less than the laboratory’s method detection limits (MDLI in all of the groundwater samples collected at the site.

0ffice.s throughout the U.S., Canada and Overseas

Mr. C. Hilton August 25, 1993 LANTDIV Page 2

Groundwater Technology Government Services, Inc. is pleased to be provided the opportunity to perform the scope of work requested. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact myself or William Hughes.

Sincerely,

GROUNDWATER TECHNOLOGY GOVERNMENT SERVICES, INC.

P. Taylor Sword, C.P.G. Project Manager/Remediation Specialist

cc: Debra Pickett - MCAS, New River, NC R. Fenstermacher - GSI, Chadds Ford, PA K. Molino, Contract Specialist - LANTDIV NAVFACENGCOM, Norfolk, VA w/o Enclosures

Enclosures: Site Map Site Plan Gauging Data Laboratory Analytical Report

GTE1 ENVIRONMENTAL

- LABORATORIES, INC.

Client Number: 830011088 Project ID: Bldg FC-201 West


Northeast Region Meadowbrook industrial Park Milford, NH 03055 (603) 672-4835 (603) 673-8105 (FAX)

April 28, 1993

Taylor Sword Government Services, inc. 1244-B Executive Blvd Chesapeake, VA 23320

Dear Mr. Sword:


A formal Quality Assurance / Quality Control (CIA/W) program is maintained by GTEL, which is designed to meet or exceed the EPA requirements. Analytical work for this project met QA/QC criteria unless otherwise stated in the footnotes.


Sincerely,


Director

GTEL Milford, NH J30.40451 .DOC:l

II Sample Date Date Date Percent Identification Sampled Extracted Analyzed Solids, %

11 GTEL No. 1 Client ID

II 040451-01 I GT-1

Client Number: 830011088 Project ID: Bldg FC-201 West


ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Total Recoverable Oil and Grease in Soil by Infrared Spectrometry

Method 503 Ba

-- -- -_ --

03/31/93 04/21/93 04/22/93 77.2

03/31/93 04/21/93 04/22/93 85.6 37 I 220

03/31/93 04/21/93 04/22/93 82.1 38 1 < 38

03/31/93 04/21/93 04/22/93 74.2 41 53

a Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 16th Edition, 1985; extraction by method 503 D (Soxhlet). Concentration calculated on a dry weight basis.

GTEL Milford, NH 33040451 .DOC:2

IGTEL ENVIRONMENTAL


ii4;/.13/03 17:22

B804

438 2312

GR

WN

L.WA

TER

TEC

E -I-.+

MILFTIR

D LA

B

I I

I } I

q OZO

#VcfJO

aWV

d

q OlO

EV

~OtO

9Vd

1 .

h. L 3 :.

1 i -1 i..i rJ .

2

0 ii!

:.

E

1 04-13-93

05:24PM

PO07

#I5 R

-94%

804 436

2312

Client Number: 830011088 Project IO: FG201 West


ANALYl

Polynuclear Aroma EPA I

GTEL Sample Number Client ldentlflcation

II

Analyte

Naphthalene Acenaohthviene

Date Sam&d bate Extracted Date Analyzed

Detection Limit, ug/L

1.8 2.3

lr 1 -Methvlnaohthalens I 1.8 2-Methylnaphthalene 1.8

AcenaDhthene 1.8 Fluorene 0.21

Phenanthrene 0.64 Anthracene 0.66

11 fluoranthene I 0.21 Pyrene

Benzo[a]anthracene Chrysene Benzorblfluoranthene

0.27 0.13c

1.5c 0.018 - ~~ ~

BenzofkIfluoranthene BenzolalDvrene

0.017 0.023

CAL RESULTS

:ic Hydrocarbons in Water &.Xhod 610a

080 194-O 1 FC201 W-l 00/06/93

08/1 l/93 08/1 4/93

080 194-02 080194-03 - FC20t W-2 FC201 w-3 -- 08/06/95 08/06/93 -- 08/l l/93 08/l l/93 -- 08/l 4/93 08 /14/93 --

Concentration, us/L c 1.9 < 1.8 < 1.8 I-

< 2.4 < 2.3 c 2.3

< 1.9 < 1.8 < 1.8

c 1.9 c 1.8 < 1.8 < 1.9 < 1.8 < 1.8 -- c 0.22 c 0.21 < 0.21 -- c 0.67 < 0.64 < 0.64 --

E Federal Register, Vol. 49, Octobar 26, 1!%4. Sample preparation b liquid/liquid extraction. The detection limit multiplier Indicates the adjustments made to the 8 ata and deTecrlon llmils for sample dilutions.

C Detectton limit was elevated due to the interference of laboratory-introduced surrogate.

GTEL Mllford, NH

---

0 V

OA

Cl S

lWR

dl31

0 O

lS8~19

Vd3

Cl kZ+)

S9N

0 lV

.UO

LZ8 0 lddlS

Z9 V

d3 1

1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . -

0 381W

W!M

0

OZO

8 0

1091X31

. /-

1 ., - - - - - - - - z - P

- - P I

r ; i c-

$

Ill

)I ?

H

H

H

3 d s v 3

q cln c

prJs\ GROUNDWATER TECHNOLOGY

1 j/ 11 11 GOVERNMENTSERVICES Groundwater Technology Government Services, G

1244 B Executive Boulevard, Suite 106. Chesapeake, VA 23320 Tel: (804) 436-7881 Fax: (804) 4362312

LIQUID LEVEL MEASUREMENTS CLIENT: NAVFACENGCOM LOCATION: Building 201, West Side

MCB, Camp Lejeune, NC DATE: August 6, 1993

MONITORING WELLS

DEPTH TO WATER MEASURED RELATIVE TO LIP OF PVC

DTW = Depth to Water Elev-W = Elevation of Water DTP = Depth to Product PT = Product Thickness TOC = Top of Casing

Corrected Elev-W = Corrected water elevation for the presence of hydrocarbon floating on the water table

= TOC ELEV - DTW + (PT x 0.88)


July 6, 1993 Prepared for: Commander Atlantic Division ... · North Carolina - Department of...

Documents

Transcript of July 6, 1993 Prepared for: Commander Atlantic Division ... · North Carolina - Department of...