July 20, 2005S.Abdullin SUSY Triggers1 Salavat Abdullin For CMS Collaboration SUSY 2005, July 18-23,...
-
date post
21-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
224 -
download
1
Transcript of July 20, 2005S.Abdullin SUSY Triggers1 Salavat Abdullin For CMS Collaboration SUSY 2005, July 18-23,...
July 20, 2005 S.Abdullin SUSY Triggers 1
Salavat Abdullin
For CMS Collaboration
SUSY 2005, July 18-23, 2005Durham, UK
July 20, 2005 S.Abdullin SUSY Triggers 2
Outline
LHC rate challenge
mSUGRA test points
L1 trigger
L2 inclusive jet + ETmiss
L2 trigger cuts optimization
More (cross-) triggers
QCD multi-jet rate
Summary
July 20, 2005 S.Abdullin SUSY Triggers 3
Triggering on SUSY : Rate Challenge
Task : reduce 40 MHz bx rate ( ~1 GHz pp) O(100 Hz)
To preserve maximal SUSY signal efficiency in jets + ET channel
Recon. MET (hi lumi)Recon. MET (low lumi)Gen. MET (hi lumi)Gen MET (low lumi)
Recon. MET (hi lumi)Recon. MET (low lumi)Gen. MET (hi lumi)Gen MET (low lumi)
Expected Missing ET Rate Expected Missing ET Rate
Calo resolutionCalo resolution
Requiring a rate to tape of a ~few Hz implies an inclusive single-jet threshold of 350-500 GeV and an inclusive missing ET threshold of 100-170 GeV
Low lumi Low lumi
High lumi High lumi
Inclusive Jet Rate (cone algorithm, R=0.5)Inclusive Jet Rate (cone algorithm, R=0.5)
Full GEANT-basedCMS simulation +OO reconstruction
CMS DAQ TDRCERN/LHCC 2002-26
July 20, 2005 S.Abdullin SUSY Triggers 4
SUSY Points
DAQ TDR points
http://cmsdoc.cern.ch/cms/PRS/susybsm/msugra_testpts/msugra_testpts.html
mSUGRA low-mass test points (“4-6”) have beenchosen fo DAQ TDR: -close to the Tevatron reach-different final state topologies(backup slides contain more details)
mSUGRA high-mass points(“7-9”) from DAQ TDR arenot considered hereas having fairly high trigger efficiency
DAQ TDR points
“LM” and “HM” points (low andhigh mass) for Phys. TDR
July 20, 2005 S.Abdullin SUSY Triggers 5
L1 SUSY Triggers
L1 Jet&MET triggers alone are > 80 % efficient,
All L1 triggers ~ 89-96% CMS Note 2003/028
SUSY signal efficiency (%) and background rate (kHz)
Differ from DAQ TDR numbers
as not 95% cuts 96.2%
96.3%
88.9%
July 20, 2005 S.Abdullin SUSY Triggers 6
Inclusive SUSY Jet+MET
1
2
-1
QCD L2 rate (Hz)
mSUGRA 5 L2 Efficiency
Running a bit ahead –chosen L2 cuts yield ~ 45-65 % efficiencyat a few Hz of QCD rate
Jet1 threshold (150 GeV) -calibratedMET threshold (92 GeV) -raw
July 20, 2005 S.Abdullin SUSY Triggers 7
Chosen L2 Triggers (I)
L2 triggers : a combination of J1+MET and J4J1+MET works for “standard” SUSY, while J4 - for most challenging (fot trigger) R-parity violation scenario 3j, points 4R, 5R, 6R
J4 MET, J1 fixed @ 150 GeV
July 20, 2005 S.Abdullin SUSY Triggers 8
Chosen L2 Triggers (II)
Cuts were optimized simultaneously for all 6 probing SUSY points using Genetic Algorithm for given rate allocation of ~ 12 Hz (more details can be found on the backup slides)
SUSY signal efficiency (%) and background rate (Hz)
mostly QCD
113 GeV at 95% effIn DAQ TDR
180 & 123 GeV at 95% eff in DAQ TDR
July 20, 2005 S.Abdullin SUSY Triggers 9
More Triggers For SUSY
Lepton + MET - SM bkgd. : normalize predictions for W and tt
- might add smth. to SUSY signal, especially if decay leptonically
-
MET+lepton+jet might be too complicated, so - lepton + MET (above) - jet + MET (exists) - lepton + jet (1/2 exists, for electrons)
2 leptons + MET might help to keep low thresholds and low rates
The efficiencies of these triggers (above) for SUSY have to be studied for CMS Physics TDR
July 20, 2005 S.Abdullin SUSY Triggers 10
L1-L2 Streams For SUSY
Among various possible combinations of L1 and L2 triggersthere are typically just a few “leading” streams which providethe essential part of the signal efficiency
For instance, among 18 L1-L2 streamsconsidered, only 6 are essential both for R-parity conservationand violation scenarios.
July 20, 2005 S.Abdullin SUSY Triggers 11
QCD Multijet Rate Issue
QCD multi-jet is a main rate component, about 90% of the total rate even at L2, so since years there was a question about possible significant underestimate of the QCD rate
All previous rate calculations have been made with PYTHIA (shower model)
Now a preliminary comparison of the inclusive jet ET
distributions is made at the level of the MC jets betweenALPGEN 2.01 and PYTHIA 6.2 (“old” shower model)
Details of calculation can be found on the backup slides
July 20, 2005 S.Abdullin SUSY Triggers 12
Inclusive Jet ET Distributions
For low-Et and “medium”-Et 3d and 4th jets the difference does not look significant
Harder jet ET cuts to be investigated !
July 20, 2005 S.Abdullin SUSY Triggers 13
Summary
No problem with L1 trigger even for low-mass SUSY
L2 has to be optimized due to the limitedbandwidth allocated to jets and MET
More cross-triggers might possiblyincrease L2 SUSY signal efficiency(to be studied)
Preliminary comparison of 3d and 4th jets inclusive distributions show a goodAgreement between ALPGEN and PYTHIA
July 20, 2005 S.Abdullin SUSY Triggers 24
QCD Simulation with PYTHIA
PT > 20 and 120 GeV
Official CMS Production data cards
^
To put ALPGEN and PYTHIA data on the common ground
a cut of 120 GeV is applied on the 1st jet ET in both samples
July 20, 2005 S.Abdullin SUSY Triggers 25
ALPGEN samples
ALPGEN v201 Q2= PT
2(parton) PDFs CTEQ5L
Matching scheme CKKW (M Mangano impementation in Alpgen, see http://mlm.home.cern.ch/mlm/alpgen)
Jet parameters for matching: E
T(jet) > 15 GeV
R(jet) = 0.525, R(parton-jet) < 0.7875
July 20, 2005 S.Abdullin SUSY Triggers 26
ALPGEN samples
2-to-2 : Npartons
=2; PT(parton)>20 (100) GeV; |eta|<5
R(parton-parton) >0.7
2-to-3 : Npartons
=3; PT(parton)>20 (100) GeV; |eta|<5
R(parton-parton) >0.7
2-to-4 : Npartons
=4; PT(parton)>20 (100) GeV; |eta|<5
R(parton-parton) >0.7
(parton= outgoing parton)
July 20, 2005 S.Abdullin SUSY Triggers 27
samples cross sections
sample (matched-alp) (unw-alp) matching (pythia) 2-2 0.4 mb 0.8 mb 0.5 - 2-3 0.02 mb 0.06 mb 0.3 - 2-4 0.0024 mb 0.016 mb 0.15 - total 0.45 mb 0.876 mb - 0.83 mb
sample (matched-alp) (unw-alp) matching (pythia) 2-2 6 × 10-4 mb 0.0013 mb 0.45 - 2-3 1.5 × 10-5 mb 4 × 10-5 mb 0.38 - 2-4 1 × 10-6 mb 3.6 × 10-6 mb 0.27 - total 6.16 ×10-4 mb 1. 344 × 10-3 mb - 6.3×10-4 mb
20 GeV
100 GeV