Judicial Fraud - 40 Cases Later ...

8/8/2019 Judicial Fraud - 40 Cases Later ...

1/24


2/24


3/24


4/24

Tax Year 2010

Next Lower Parcel Number Next Higher Parcel Number Tax Estimator Tax Bills Print

Owner Of Record

LEE COUNTY PO BOX 398FORT MYERS FL 33902

Site Address

GOVT LOTCAPTIVA FL 33924

Legal Description

CAYO COSTA PB 3 PG 25 ALL UNNUMBERED AND ACCRETED LANDS

Classification / DOR Code

COUNTIES - OTHER / 86

[ Viewer ] Tax Map [ Print ]

[ Pictometry Aerial Viewer ]

Property Values (2010 Tax Roll)

Just 1,074,100

Assessed 1,074,100

Portability Applied 0

Assessed SOH 1,074,100

Taxable 0

Building 0

Building Features Incl. in bldg value

Land 1,074,100

Land Features Incl. in land value

SOH Difference 0

Exemptions

Homestead 0

Additional Homestead 0

Widow 0

Widower 0

Disability 0

Wholly 1,074,100

Senior 0

Agriculture 0

Attributes

Land Units of Measure AC

Total Number of Land Units 107.41

Frontage 0

Depth 0

Total Number of Buildings 0

Total Bedrooms 0

Total Bathrooms 0

Total Buildings Sq Ft 0

1st Year Building on Tax Roll 0

Historic District No

TRIM (proposed tax) Notices are available for the following tax years[ 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 ]

Next Lower Parcel Number Next Hig her Parcel Number New Query Search Results Home

Lee County Property Appraiser

Property Data for Parcel 12-44-20-01-00000.00A0

Taxing Authorities

Sales / Transactions

Solid Waste (Garbage) Roll Data

Elevation Information

Appraisal Details

12/25/2010 Lee County Property Appraiser - Onlin

leepa.org/Display/DisplayParcel.aspx? 1/1


5/24

Tax Year 2010


Owner Of Record

LEE COUNTY PO BOX 398FORT MYERS FL 33902

Site Address

CAYO COSTA CAPTIVA FL 33924

Legal Description

ALL UN-NUMBERED + UN-DESIGNATED LOTS IN CAYOCOSTA + LT K BLK 32


COUNTIES - OTHER / 86




Just 91,700

Assessed 91,700


Assessed SOH 91,700

Taxable 0

Building 0


Land 91,700


SOH Difference 0

Exemptions

Homestead 0


Widow 0

Widower 0

Disability 0

Wholly 91,700

Senior 0

Agriculture 0

Attributes

Land Units of Measure AC


Frontage 0

Depth 0


Total Bedrooms 0

Total Bathrooms 0


1st Year Building on Tax Roll 0

Historic District No


Next Lower Parcel Number Next Hig her Parcel Number New Query Search Results Home


Property Data for Parcel 07-44-21-01-00001.0000

Taxing Authorities


Parcel Numbering History



Appraisal Details




6/24

DO NOT PAY - THIS IS NOT A BILL

NOTICE OF PROPOSED PROPERTY TAXES

TAX INFORMATIONBUSSE JORG +PO BOX 7651NAPLES, FL 34101

274010 THParcel ID:12-44-20-01-00015.015A CAYO COSTA PB 3 PG 25LOT 15A

ACCESS UNDETERMINED

The taxing authorities which levy property taxes againstyour property will soon hold PUBLIC HEARINGS to adoptbudgets and tax rates for the next year.

The purpose of t hese PUBLIC HEARINGS is to re ceiveopinions from the general public and to answer questions onthe proposed tax change and budget PRIOR TO TAKINGFINAL ACTION. Each tax ing authority may AMEND OR

ALTER its proposals at the hearing.

TAXING AUTHORITY COLUMN 1* COLUMN 2* COLUMN 3*

050COUNTY / NO FIRE DISTRICT

LAST YEARS ACTUAL TAX

RATE 2009(MILLAGE)

YOUR PROPERTY TAXES LAST YEAR

2009

YOUR TAX RATE THIS

YEAR IF NOBUDGET

CHANGE IS ADOPTED(MILLAGE)

YOUR TAXES THIS YEAR IF NO

BUDGET CHANGEIS ADOPTED

THIS YEARSPROPOSEDTAX RATE

2010(MILLAGE)

YOUR TAXES IFPROPOSED

BUDGET CHANGEIS ADOPTED 2010

County:

LEE COUNTY CAPITAL IMP 0.5000 $16.00 0.5887 $14.72 0.5000 $12.50

LEE COUNTY GENERAL REVENUE 3.6506 $116.82 4.2835 $107.09 4.2835 $107.09

LEE COUNTY LIBRARY FUND 0.2844 $9.10 0.3383 $8.46 0.3383 $8.46

School:

PUBLIC SCHOOL - BY LOCAL BOARD 2.2480 $71.94 2.6311 $65.78 2.2480 $56.20

PUBLIC SCHOOL - BY STATE LAW 5.2600 $168.32 6.1563 $153.91 5.7670 $144.18

Municipality or MSTU:

LEE COUNTY UNINCORPORATED - MSTU 0.8398 $26.87 0.9906 $24.77 0.8398 $21.00

LEE COUNTY ALL HAZARDS - MSTU 0.0693 $2.22 0.0820 $2.05 0.0693 $1.73

Water Management District:

SFL WATER MGMT-EVERGLADE CONST 0.0894 $2.86 0.1013 $2.53 0.0894 $2.24

SFL WATER MGMT-DISTRICT LEVY 0.2549 $8.16 0.2892 $7.23 0.2549 $6.37

SFL WATER MGMT-OKEECHOBEE LEVY 0.2797 $8.95 0.3170 $7.93 0.2797 $6.99

Independent Special Districts:

LEE COUNTY HYACINTH CONTROL 0.0277 $0.89 0.0322 $0.81 0.0310 $0.78

LEE COUNTY MOSQUITO CONTROL 0.2132 $6.82 0.2485 $6.21 0.2388 $5.97

WEST COAST INLAND NAVIGATION DISTRICT 0.0394 $1.26 0.0464 $1.16 0.0394 $0.99

TOTAL TAX RATES: 13.7564 16.1051 14.9791

TOTAL PROPERTY TAXES: $440.21 $402.65 $374.50

COLUMN 1* COLUMN 2* COLUMN 3*

NOTICE OF PROPOSED PROPERTY TAXES EXPLANATION (Section 200.069, Florida Statutes)

*COLUMN 1 "YOUR PROPERTY TAXES LAST YEAR" - Thiscolumn shows the tax es that a pplied last year to yourproperty. These amounts were based on budgets adoptedlast year and your property s previous taxable value.

*COLUMN 2 "YOUR TAXES IF NO BUDGET CHANGE IS ADOPTED" - This column shows what your taxes will be thisyear IF EACH TAXING AUTHORITY DOES NOT CHANGE ITSPROPERTY TAX LEVY. These amounts are based on lastyears budgets and y our current assessment.

*COLUMN 3 "YOUR TAXES IF PROPOSED BUDGETCHANGE IS ADOPTED" - This column shows what your taxeswill be this year under the BUDGET ACTUALLY PROPOSED byeach local taxing authority. The proposal is NOT final andmay be amended at the public hearings shown on thisnotice. The difference between C olumns 2 and 3 is the t axchange proposed by each local taxing authority and is NOTthe result of higher assessments.

NOTE: Amounts shown on this form do NOT reflect early payment discounts you may have received or may be eligible to receive. (Discounts are a maximum of 4 percent of the amountsshown on this form.)

NON-AD VALOREM ASSESSMENTS: Your final tax bill may contain Non-Ad Valorem assessments which may not be reflected on this notice such a s assessments for roads, fire, garbage,lighting, drainage, water, sewer, or ot her governmental services and facilities which may be levied by your county, city, or any special district

A Public Hearing on the Proposed Taxes and Budget Will Be Held:

COUNTY/MSTU: 09/08/10 5:05pm Lee County Commission Chambers 2120 Main St. Fort Myers, FL 33901 Phone 239-533-2221

SCHOOL: 09/14/10 5:05pm Lee County Public Education Ctr. 2855 Colonial Blvd. Fort Myers, FL 33966 Phone 239-337-8215WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT: 09/08/10 5:15pm SFWMD Auditorium Bldg. B-1 3301 Gun Club Rd. West Palm Beach, FL 33406 Phone 561-686-8800LEE COUNTY HYACINTH AND MOSQUITO CONTROL: 09/09/10 5:15pm District Offices 15191 Homestead Rd. Lehigh Acres, FL 33971 Phone 239-694-2174WEST COAST INLAND NAVIGATION DISTRICT: 09/10/10 5:01pm Venice City Hall 401 W. Venice Ave. Venice, FL 34285 Phone 941-485-9402

12/18/2010 2010 TRIM Notice

leepa.org/TrimDetail/WebTrim.aspx?F 1/5


7/24

PROPERTY VALUATION

Last Year 2009 This Year 2010If you fee l the assessment of y our property does notreflect fair market value, or if you are entitled to anexemption or classification that is not ref lected on thisform, please contact:Lee County Property A ppraisers Office 2480 ThompsonStreet, 4th Floor, Fort Myers or P.O. Box 1546, Ft.Myers, FL 33902 Phone: (239) 533-6100

MARKET VALUE $32,000.00 $25,000.00Market value (also called Just value) is the most probable sales price for your property in a competitive, open market. It isbased on a willing buyer and a willing seller.

VALUE CALCULATIONS

TAXING AUTHORITY ASSESSED VALUE* EXEMPTIONS TAXABLE VALUE**

LAST YEAR THIS YEAR LAST YEAR THIS YEAR LAST YEAR THIS YEAR County:

LEE COUNTY CAPITAL IMP $32,000.00 $25,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $32,000.00 $25,000.00

LEE COUNTY GENERAL REVENUE $32,000.00 $25,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $32,000.00 $25,000.00

LEE COUNTY LIBRARY FUND $32,000.00 $25,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $32,000.00 $25,000.00

School:

PUBLIC SCHOOL - BY LOCAL BOARD $32,000.00 $25,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $32,000.00 $25,000.00

PUBLIC SCHOOL - BY STATE LAW $32,000.00 $25,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $32,000.00 $25,000.00

Municipality or MSTU:

LEE COUNTY UNINCORPORATED - MSTU $32,000.00 $25,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $32,000.00 $25,000.00

LEE COUNTY ALL HAZARDS - MSTU $32,000.00 $25,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $32,000.00 $25,000.00

Water Management District:

SFL WATER MGMT-EVERGLADE CONST $32,000.00 $25,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $32,000.00 $25,000.00

SFL WATER MGMT-DISTRICT LEVY $32,000.00 $25,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $32,000.00 $25,000.00

SFL WATER MGMT-OKEECHOBEE LEVY $32,000.00 $25,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $32,000.00 $25,000.00

Independent Special Districts:

LEE COUNTY HYACINTH CONTROL $32,000.00 $25,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $32,000.00 $25,000.00

LEE COUNTY MOSQUITO CONTROL $32,000.00 $25,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $32,000.00 $25,000.00

WEST COAST INLAND NAVIGATION DISTRICT $32,000.00 $25,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $32,000.00 $25,000.00

*Assessed Value is the market value of your property minus any assessment reductions. The assess ed value may be different f or levies made by different tax ing authorities.

**Taxable Value is the value used to calculate the t ax due on your property. Taxable value is the assessed value minus the va lue of your ex emptions.

ASSESSMENT REDUCTIONS APPLIES TO VALUE

Properties can receive an assessment reduction for a number of reasons.There are limits on how much the assessment of your property can increaseeach year. For example, the Sav e Our Homes program and the limitation fornon-homestead property are t wo types of reductions. Cert ain types of property, such as agricultural land and land used for conservation, arevalued on their current use rather than market v alue. Some reductionslower the assessed value only f or levies of certain tax ing authorities. If your assessed value is lower than y our market v alue because limits onincreases apply to y our property or because your property is va lued basedon its current use, the amount of the difference and the reason for thedifference are listed in the Assessment Reduction section above.

EXEMPTIONS APPLIES TO VALUE

Any exemption that applies to your property is listed in this section alongwith its corresponding exemption value. Specific dollar or percentagereductions in assessed value may be applicable to a property based uponcertain qualifications of the property owner. In some cases, an exemptionsvalue may vary depending on the taxing authority. The tax impact of anexemption may also vary f or the same taxing authority, depending on thelevy (e. g., operating millage vs. debt service millage.)

You may f ile a petition for an adjustment with the Value Adjustment Board. It is not mandatory to contact the Property Appraiser prior to doing so.

Petition forms are av ailable from the Lee County Property Appraisers Off ice and also at www.leepa.org.

Online filing is now available at www.leeclerk.org.

All petitions must be filed with the C lerk of Courts Of fice ON OR BEFORE

SEPTEMBER 14th, 2010

12/18/2010 2010 TRIM Notice



8/24

Dear Lee County,Property Owner:

As you can see t he Notice of Proposed Property Taxes

has a new f ormat. Due tochanges in the FloridaStatutes, t he opportunity

presented itself for this office to review and revise thisform to meet the new requirements and sav e money. Thenew format that we designed is expected to sav e at least$25,000.

Your property v alues are important to me, especially inthese difficult economic times. It is our duty to provideyou, t he taxpay er, with sound, reliable, and equitableassessments.

Your Notice provides your Proposed Taxes for 2010 andthe Property Valuation of your property as of January 1,2010.

If you agree that the fair market of your property, basedon 2009 sales, is at least as much as shown in the Notice,you do not have to do anything. However, if you have anyquestions about this value, assessment reductions orexemptions, we e ncourage you to contact this off ice.

The Property A ppraiser does not determine the amount of tax y ou pay. Tax ing Authorities determine the tax ratebased on money needed to fund their budgets. Should youhave any questions regarding the amount of tax es you arepaying, please contact the respective authorities listed onthe front page of your Notice.

It is my goal as your elected Property A ppraiser to providefair assessments for all property. Feel free to contact us.Our door is always open.

Respectfully,

Kenneth M. Wilkinson, C FA Lee County Property Appraiser

Lee County Property Appraisers Office

Physical Address: 2480 Thompson St.,4th Floor

Fort Myers, FL 33901Mailing Address: P.O. Box 1546

Fort Myers, FL 33902Office Hours: Monday - Friday

8:30am to 5:00pmDirections: Downtown Fort Myers at the corner of Dr.Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. & Fowler Street (4th Floor

Constitutional Complex)

Real Property Hotline

(239) 533-6100 F ax (239) 533-6160

Tangible Personal Property Hotline

(239) 533-6140 F ax (239) 533-6289

Outside of 239 Area Code (866) 673-2868Lee County Clerk of Court (239) 533-2328 (V.A. B.)Lee County Tax Collector (239) 533-6000 (Tax Bill)

UNDERSTA NDING YOUR NOTICE OF PROPOSED PROPERTY TAXES

In 2009, the Florida Legislature substantially revised the requirements for t he Notice of Proposed Property Taxes. Onemajor change you will notice is that the Tax Information portion is separated f rom the Property Valuation portion. For

additional information please v isit our website at www.leepa.org.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Homestead Exempt ion and Save Our Homes 10% Non-Homestead Limitat ion

Homestead Exemption is a constitutional benefit thatexempts up to $50,000 from the assessed va lue of yourproperty. A fter the base year of the qualified

Homestead Exemption application, the as sessed v aluecannot increase more than 3% per year because of the Save Our Homes (SOH) benefit. This constitutionalbenefit that Mr. Wilkinson authored in 1992 was enactedto prevent homestead property owners from being taxedout of their homes in the face of a rapidly increasingmarket. For property with Homestead Ex emption, SOHlimits or caps the increases to your assessed value (notyour taxes ). That capped value is the SOH assessedvalue. From the SOH assessed v alue, exemptions aresubtracted to arrive at the taxable value.

Enacted as a part of Amendment 1 in 2008, a 10%assessment increase limitation applies to eligible non-homestead property that did not change ownership

or control in the previous year. This limitation has thesame premise as the Save Our Homes assessmentreduction. Once a base y ear is established (2008 isthe base year or the year the property waspurchased thereafter) the assessed value of theproperty cannot increase more than 10%. Any newconstruction or improvements to the property t hatwere not previously assessed, will be added to the

limitation amount and will be included the followingyear. There is no application necessary to receivethe 10% Non-Homestead Limitation.

What is Recapture?

If your market value decreased and y our assessed va lue increased without any new construction, y ou may be feelingthe eff ects of Recapture. Recapture means that any property t hat has an assessed v alue less than market value,shall be increased. For Homestead properties: The Recapture Rule requires Property Appraisers to raise theassessed va lue by the maximum of 3% or the annual Consumer Price Index (C.P. I.) change, whichever is less, a slong as the ass essed value is lower than market value in any given year. For Non-Homestead properties: FloridaStatute 193.1555(3) states Property subject to the 10% cap shall be reassessed annually with the increase in

assessment not to exceed 10%. This increase should occur whether or not the just v alue increases, as long asassessed value does not exceed just value (regardless of the C.P.I.).

Calculating Ad Valorem Taxes

Taxing AuthorityBudget

Total Taxable Value of all property in jurisdiction

= Tax Rate(%)

Tax Rate(%) x

Your Taxable Value foreach Taxing Authority =

Taxes Paid to Each Authority ($)

Sum of all Taxes Paidto Each Authority ($) =

Your Ad ValoremTaxes

Additional Homestead Exemption Seniors Exemption

If you currently re ceive a homestead exemption and your

property v alue exceeds $50, 000, y ou will automatically receivethe additional homestead exemption. No application or otheraction is necessary to receive t his benefit. Effective January 1,2008, the additional exemption of up to $25,000 will apply to alllevies except those by school districts and other assessmentsfor special benefits. This additional exemption of $25,000applies to assessed values between $50,000 and $75, 000. If your property v alue is less than $75,000, the exemptionamount will be less than $25,000.

All Lee County residents who are 65 or older

(as of January 1st ) who qualify f or andreceive the homestead ex emption and whose2009 annual gross adjusted household incomedoes not exceed $25, 873, are e ligible toreceive the exemption. A lthough you mustmake an initial application (January 1st -March 1st), an annual re-application is notrequired as long as your income does notexceed the annually adjusted limitation.

TAX BILLS ARE MAILEDNOVEMBER 1

Tangible Personal Property

Effective f or the 2008 tax y ear, all TangiblePersonal Property A ccounts, such asbusinesses and rentals will receive a $25,000exemption. A DR-405, Tangible PersonalProperty Tax Return, must be filed with thisoffice in the initial year of application to beeligible.

12/18/2010 2010 TRIM Notice



9/24

Portability Agricultural Classification

Portability means that y ou can transf er some or all of y our previous home's "Save O ur Homes"benefit to y our new home in an amount up to $500,000. The "Save Our Homes" benefit is thedifference between the asse ssed value and market value of a homestead property.

An Agricultural Classification is the designation of land by the Property Appraiser pursuant to F.S. 193. 461. The assessment is based on anagricultural use v alue. HOW DO I QUALIFY? To qualify for AgriculturalClassification, a return must be f iled with the Property Appraiser betweenJanuary 1st and March 1st of t he tax y ear. Only lands which are used for bonafide agricultural purposes shall be classified agricultural. Bona fide agriculturalpurposes means good faith commercial agricultural use of the land. TheProperty Appraiser, prior to classifying such lands, may require the taxpay er orthe tax payers representative to furnish such information as may reasonablybe required to esta blish such lands are actually used for a bona fide agriculturalpurpose. For more information please contact our Agricultural Department at(239) 533-6172.

What if I do not agree with my Values?

If you believe that y our assessment does not represent the f air market value of the property ,you may file a petition with the Clerk of Court f or a hearing before the Value Adjustment Board(V.A.B.). This Board is created by Sta te Law and is comprised of five members. The Boardappoints Special Magistrates who are qualified appraisers or attorney s, independent of theProperty Appraisers Off ice, to conduct valuation hearings. The Special Magistrates areappointed only to determine whether t he appraised value of the property is fair market valueas of J anuary 1st. Petitions to the Board and further details concerning this process can beobtained by visiting the Property Appraisers Off ice or our website at www.leepa.org. Pet itionsmust be received (not merely postmarked) by the C lerk of Court before the date that appearson the T. R.I.M. Notice. The petition must be accompanied with a $15.00 per parcel f iling fee.Submission with the petition of all requested information ensures proper review of yourrequest. MAKING A CA SE: You can prevail at V.A. B. by present ing evidence and testimonythat your propertys assesse d value is not market value. The fact t hat your assessed v alueincreased or decreased from last yea r is not a basis to alter this years assessment.

Problems common to the neighborhood are already considered in the sales of properties sold. Also, you cannot base your case on personal hardship, such asliving on a f ixed income or an inability t o pay t axes. You may, however, beeligible for the Tax Deferral Plan or Installment Payments off ered through theTax Collectors Office. Information regarding these plans is available at the TaxCollectors website (www.leetc.com). THE V.A.B. HEARING: Value AdjustmentBoard hearings begin in the f all. While an attorney is not required, one mayrepresent you. Both the Property Appraiser and Taxpayer present evidenceand testimony t o a Special Magistrate. A fter the Special Magistrate hearing,the V.A. B. will notify y ou in writing of their decision. If you accept the decision,do nothing further. If you disagree with the V.A. B. decision, you may file aCircuit Court civil action pursuant to Florida Statute 194.171. Additionalinformation can be obtained from our office, or you may contact the LeeCounty C lerk of Courts Off ice at (239) 533-2328 regarding the filing process.

Lee County Taxing AuthoritiesP.O. Box 1270Fort Myers, FL 33902-1270

2010 NOTICE OF PROPOSED REAL PROPERTY TAXES

BUSSE JORG +PO BOX 7651NAPLES, FL 34101

DO NOT PAY THIS IS

NOT A BILL

12/18/2010 2010 TRIM Notice



10/24

* All case information on this website was last updated 12/26/2010 6:00:00 PM

BUSSE, JORG ETAL PLA INTIFF VS STATE OF FLORIDA ETAL DEFENDANT

Case Number: 06-CA-003185Uniform Case Number: 362006CA0031850001CHCase Type: CA Declaratory JudgmentSub Case Type:Judge: Gerald, Lynn, Jr.Filed Date: 7/31/2006Disposition: OtherDisposition Date: 12/5/2008

Plaintiffs

Busse, Jorg Attorney: Jorg Busse

Roesch Family Attorney: Roesch Family

Ruzicka, Gerald E Attorney: Gerald E Ruzicka

Carroll Family Attorney: Carroll Family

Lay, Janet Attorney: Janet Lay

Defendants

State of Florida Attorney: Linda Kathryn Funchess

State of Florida Attorney: Reagan Kathleen Russell

Bush, John Ellis Attorney:

Armstrong, Eva Attorney:

Civil / Small Claims Detail Information

12/26/2010 Civil - Small Claims Detail

apps.leeclerk.org/Civil_Detail.asp?CsN 1/21


11/24

Search Law School Search Cornell

LII / Legal Information Institute home search find a lawyer donate

main page sea rch | civi l p rocedure ove rview

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

VIII. P ROVISIONAL AND FINAL REMEDIES > Rule 65. Prev | Next

(a) Preliminary Injunction.

(1) Notice.

The court may issue a preliminary injunction only on notice to the adverseparty.

(2) Consolidating the Hearing with the Trial on the Merits.

Before or after beginning the hearing on a motion for a preliminary injunction,

the court may advance the trial on the merits and consolidate it with thehearing. Even when consolidation is not ordered, evidence that is receivedon the motion and that would be admissible at trial becomes part of the trialrecord and need not be repeated at trial. But the court must preserve anyparty's right to a jury trial.

(b) Temporary Restraining Order.

(1) Issuing Without Notice.

The court may issue a temporary restraining order without written or oralnotice to the adverse party or its attorney only if:

(A) specific facts in an affidavit or a verified complaint clearly show thatimmediate and irreparable injury, loss, or damage will result to the movant

before the adverse party can be heard in opposition; and

(B) the movant's attorney certifies in writing any efforts made to givenotice and the reasons why it should not be required.

(2) Contents; Ex piration.

Every temporary restraining order issued without notice must state the dateand hour it was issued; describe the injury and state why it is irreparable;state why the order was issued without notice; and be promptly filed in theclerk's office and entered in the record. The order expires at the time afterentry not to exceed 14 days that t he court sets, unless before thattime the court, for good cause, extends it for a like period or the adverseparty consents to a longer extension. The reasons for an extension must beentered in the record.

(3) Expediting the Preliminary-Injunction Hearing.

If the order is issued without notice, the motion for a preliminary injunctionmust be set for hearing at the earliest possible time, taking precedence overall other matters except hearings on older matters of the same character. Atthe hearing, the party who obtained the order must proceed with themotion; if the party does not, the court must dissolve the order.

(4) Motion to Dissolve.

On 2 days' notice to the party who obtained the order without notice oron shorter notice set by the court the adverse party may appear andmove to dissolve or modify the order. The court must then hear and decidethe motion as promptly as justice requires.

Donations cover only20% of our costs.

Notes

Law About ... CivilProcedure

Attorneys: reachinterested clients bysponsoring an LII page

Rule 65. Injunctions and Restraining Orders

Eurail GlobalPassesBuy directly fromEurail website.Special Student

Discounts!www.eurail.com/Glob

11/30/2010 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure - Rule

www.law.cornell.edu//Rule65.htm 1/2


12/24

(c) Security.

The court may issue a preliminary injunct ion or a t emporary restraining orderonly if the movant gives security in an amount that the court considers properto pay the costs and damages sustained by any party found to have beenwrongfully enjoined or restrained. The United States, its officers, and itsagencies are not required to give security.

(d) Contents and Scope of Every Injunction and RestrainingOrder.

(1) Contents.

Every order granting an injunction and every restraining order must:

(A) state the reasons why it issued;

(B) state its terms specifically; and

(C) describe in reasonable detail and not by referring to the complaint orother document the act or acts restrained or required.

(2) Persons Bound.

The order binds only the following who receive actual notice of it bypersonal service or otherwise:

(A) the parties;

(B) the parties' officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys; and

(C) other persons who are in active concert or participation with anyonedescribed in Rule 65(d)(2)(A) or (B).

(e) Other Laws Not Modified.

(1) any federal statut e relating t o t emporary restraining orders or preliminaryinjunctions in actions affecting employer and employee;

(2) 28 U.S.C. 2361 , which relates to preliminary injunctions in actions of interpleader or in the nature of interpleader; or

(3) 28 U.S.C. 2284 , which relates to actions that must be heard anddecided by a three-judge district court.

(f) Copyright Impoundment.

This rule applies t o c opyright- impoundment proceedings.

Prev | Next

about us help terms of use friend us follow us contact us

11/30/2010 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure - Rule

www.law.cornell.edu//Rule65.htm 2/2


13/24

MA

U.S. District CourtDistrict of New Hampshire (Concord)

CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:10-cv-00321-JL

USA, Ex Rel et al v. USA et alAssigned to: Judge Joseph N. LaplanteReferred to: Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCaffertyCase in other court: USDC-FL, Middle (Ft. Myers), 2:07-00228-

JES-SPCCause: 18:1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Date Filed: 07/29/2010Jury Demand: Plaintiff

Nature of Suit: 890 Other Statutory ActionsJurisdiction: U.S. Government Defendant

Plaintiff

USA, Ex Rel

Plaintiff

Jorg Busse represented by Jorg Busse 10 Benning St, #135West Lebanon, NH 03784-3402PRO SE

Plaintiff

Jennifer Franklin Prescott represented by Jennifer Franklin Prescott 10 Benning St, #135West Lebanon, NH 03784-3402561 400-3295PRO SE

V.

Defendant

USA

DefendantUS Courts

Defendant

US Custom & Immigration Service

Defendant

Tony West

Defendant

11/29/2010 CM/ECF - U.S. District Court:nhd

ecf.nhd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl 1/5


14/24


15/24


16/24


17/24


18/24


19/24


20/24

Tax Year 2010


Owner Of Record

BUSSE JORG +PRESCOTT JENNIFER FPO BOX 7651NAPLES FL 34101

Site Address

ACCESS UNDETERMINEDCAPTIVA FL 33924

Legal Description

CAYO COSTA PB 3 PG 25LOT 15A


VACANT RESIDENTIAL / 00




Just 25,000

Assessed 25,000


Assessed SOH 25,000

Taxable 25,000

Building 0


Land 25,000


SOH Difference 0

Exemptions

Homestead 0


Widow 0

Widower 0

Disability 0

Wholly 0

Senior 0

Agriculture 0

Attributes

Land Units of Measure LT


Frontage 50

Depth 135


Total Bedrooms 0

Total Bathrooms 0


1st Year Building on Tax Roll 0Historic District No


Next Lower Parcel Number Next Higher Parcel Number New Query Search Results Home


Property Data for Parcel 12-44-20-01-00015.015A

Taxing Authorities


Parcel Numbering History



Appraisal Details




21/24


22/24


23/24

Presseschau zu WikiLeaks

"Massenvernichtungswaffe gegen das Vertrauen"

Die Kom m entatoren der deutschen T ageszeitungen sehen durch die Verffentlichu ngT ausender diplomatischer Dokum ente v or allem die US-Auenpolitik beschdigt. Aber auch

WikiLeaks wird kritisiert: Die Motiv e fr die Enth llungen seien wenig transparent. Zudem werde Vertrauen v ernichtet.

Dazu heit es in der"Sddeutschen Zeitung" : "Nach der V erffentlichung der gesto hlenen Depeschen, Analysen, Handlungsanweisungen und Kommentare drngt sich nun die Frage auf, wie lange die USA noch Frchte ihres diplomatischen Dienstes genieen knnen. Die v on der Internet-Organisation Wikileaks verbreitete Beute eines Datendiebes zerstrt nmlich das Bindegewebe, das die unter Staaten betriebeneKommunikation ausmacht: die Vertraulichkeit. Ohne Vertraulichkeit keine Information, kein Geben undNehmen, kein Zugang. Ohne Information aber auch keine Kenntnis, keine Urteilskraft, keine richtigen

Entscheidungen. Wikileaks hat sich als Massenvernichtungswaffe fr das letzte Quntchen V ertrauenerwiesen."

"An den neuen Enthllungen ist wenig sensationell", findet die"Mitteldeutsch e Zeitung" : "Zumal die Aufgabe jedes diplomatischen Dienstes vo r allem darin besteht, die Heimatregierung mit zutreffenden undungeschminkten Einsichten ber die jeweiligen Gastlnder zu v ersorgen. Dennoch sind alle Beteiligten blogestellt. Und das wird allen Beteuerungen zum Trotz Einfluss haben auf die knftigen Beziehungen. DieUSA haben ihr Gesicht verloren, weil sie das erste Gebot diplomatischer Arbeit gebrochen haben: DiskretioDieses Vertrauen wieder herzustellen, wird schwer sein. A nders als die Berichte von Wikileaks berKriegsverbrechen oder Folter ntzen diese Enthllungen deshalb niemandem."

"Lunte ans Pulverfass legen"

"Eine riesige Blamage fr die amerikanische Diplomatie sind nicht die Inhalte", betont die"Neue Westflische" , "sondern die Tatsache, dass sie an die ffentlichkeit gelangt sind. Mit wie viel kindlichemGlauben an Vorschriftenhrigkeit, Wohlverhalten und Verschlsselungstechnik muss man ausgestattet sein, wenn man im Jahr 201 0 glaubt, ber das Internet verbre itete Daten geheim halten zu knnen? Muss man dasState Department fr so ausgesprochen tumb halten? Man muss wohl, und das ist der eigentliche Skandal."

Die "Landeszeitung" aus Lneburg sieht es hnlich: "Die tiefen Einblicke in die Welt hinter der US-diplomatischen Fassade sind fr westliche Gemter eher harmlos. Peinlich ist der Umgang mit Daten in den

11/30/2010 Presseschau: Kritik an den USA und W

tagesschau.de//wikileakspressescha 1/3


24/24

USA selbst. Wenn hunderttausende Mitarbeiter in US-Behrden Zugriff auf die Daten in internen Netzenhaben, muss man sich darber wundern, dass es nicht schon vo rher Lecks gegeben hat. Der vermeintlicheSpa ber Wikileaks-Enthllungen endet aber dort, wo Aussagen verffentlicht werden von US-Diplomaten wonach einige arabische Herrscher nichts gegen eine Militrintervention der USA zur Zerstrung desiranischen Atompro grammes htten. Denn so wird fahrlssig Lunte ans Pulverfass Nahost gelegt."

"Vertrauen wird zerstrt"

Die Zeitung"Die Welt" kritisiert: "Was Wikileaks nun zerstrt hat, ist die Freiheit des ve rtraulichendiplomatischen Gesprchs. Denn was fr Privatpersonen gilt, gilt auch fr den V erkehr zwischen Staaten:Offenheit im beiderseitigen Umgang ist nur mglich, wenn man darauf vertrauen kann, dass das Gesagte nichmorgen in der ganzen Welt nachlesbar ist. Und noch etwas so llte zu denken geben: Bisher gingen Wikileaks-Enthllungen fast ausschlielich zu Lasten von demokratischen Staaten, die ohnehin ein v ergleichsweisehohes Ma an Transparenz aufweisen. Die inneren Vorgnge der echten sc hwarzen Lcher dieser Erde -Diktaturen wie I ran und Nordkorea - hat Wikileaks aber b isher nicht ans Licht der ffentlichkeit gezerr t. DieFreiheitsfeinde sind es aber, die die 250 .000 US-Depeschen am akribischsten studieren und den grtenNutzen daraus ziehen werden."

Auch der "Weser-Kurier" kann den Enthllungen nichts abgewinnen: "Die Motiv e v on Julian Assange undseinen Mitstreitern sind lngst nicht v on der Transparenz, fr die sie angeblich kmpfen. Zumindest fllt aufdass sie ihre beeindruckenden Fhigkeiten nahezu ausschlielich dazu e insetzen, die US-Regierung zuschwchen. Nun muss man mit einer Supermacht kein Mitleid haben, die durc h eigene Unfhigkeit verwundbar geworden ist. Aber die Frage ist erlaubt, wem eine so v orgefhrte und geschwchte US-Regierntzt - und ob uns das nicht am Ende sehr schadet."

"Wenig originell"

"Warum die Aufregung?", fragt die"Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung" mit Blick auf die deutsc he Politik und fhrt weiter aus: "Was Wikileaks aus amerikanischen Archiven ins Internet gepumpt hat, pfeifen, so es ddeutsche Politik angeht, in Berlin die Spatzen vo m Dach. Die Beschreibungen deutscher Politiker in denangeblichen Botschaftsberichten sind, was fr ihre Authentizitt spricht, wenig originell. 'Mutti' risikoscheu Westerwelle kein Auenpolitiker: derartige Befunde hat man schon aus v ielen ranghohen Mndern und mitmancher Ergnzung gehr t. So schreibt nicht nur die amerikanische Diplomatie ber deutschesFhrungspersonal - so denkt und spricht deutsches Fhrungspersonal bereinander."

"Es ist wunderbar, dass wir diese A kten lesen knnen", schwrmt die"Frankfurter Run dschau " . "Sie zeigenuns, wie menschlich-allzumenschlich es auch in der Diplomatie zugeht. Dieser FDP-Mann zum Beispiel, derden Koalitionsverhandlungen sitzt und sein Protokoll gleich der US-Botschaft weitergibt - das hat doch etw

Rhrendes. Nur von ihm mchte ich nicht hren, dass Wikileaks eine Ruberbande ist. Wenn Wikileaks so weitermacht, wird die Internetplattform nicht nur den Regierenden das Regieren erschweren, sondern auchuns das Regiertwerden. Wir Brger werden immer weniger uns darauf hinausreden knnen, wir htten nichtsgewusst. Wir werden genau wissen, und wir werden darum auch v iel strker einbezogen werden in das, wasgetan werden muss. Das Leben wird unbequemer werden. Wir werden uns fter engagieren mssen. Es gilt wieder: Mehr Demokratie wagen!"

Quelle: Deutschlandradio (http://www.dradio.de/presseschau/)

11/30/2010 Presseschau: Kritik an den USA und W

Judicial Fraud - 40 Cases Later ...

Documents

Transcript of Judicial Fraud - 40 Cases Later ...